Aiton, Eric, The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions, New York: American Elsevier, 1972.Google Scholar

Anonymous [Newton, Isaac], “An Account of the Book Entitled Commercium Epistolicum Collinii & aliorum, De Analysi promota,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (January–February 1714), 173–224.Google Scholar

Ayers, Michael, “Mechanism, Superaddition, and the Proof of God's Existence in Locke's Essay,” The Philosophical Review 90 (1981), 210–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrow, Isaac, The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning Explained and Demonstrated, London: Austen, 1734.Google Scholar

Barrow, Isaac,The Geometrical Lectures of Isaac Barrow, translated by Child, J. M., Chicago: Open Court Press, 1916.Google Scholar

Bentley, Richard, Eight Boyle Lectures on Atheism, 1692, New York: Garland, 1976.Google Scholar

Bentley, Richard, The Correspondence of Richard Bentley, ed. Wordsworth, Christopher, London: John Murray, 1842.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George, Philosophical Works, ed. Ayers, M. R., London: Dent, 1975.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George, Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. Woodhouse, Roger, London: Penguin, 1988.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George, De Motu and the Analyst, ed. and trans. Jesseph, Douglas, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico, Equivalence and Priority: Newton vs. Leibniz, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico, Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico,“Inherent and Centrifugal Forces in Newton,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 60 (2006), 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, Richard, “Descartes' Concept of Matter,” in McMullin, Ernan (ed.), The Concept of Matter in Modern Philosophy, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Blair, Ann, “Natural Philosophy,” in Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. vol. III: Early Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Blay, Michel, Les “Principia” de Newton, Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995.Google Scholar

Bloch, Léon, La Philosophie de Newton, Paris: Librairies Félix Alcan, 1908.Google Scholar

Boas, Marie, “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy,” Osiris 10 (1952), 412–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhme, Gernot, “Philosophische Grundlagen der Newtonschen Mechanik,” in Hutter, K. (ed.), Die Anfänge der Mechanik. Newtons Principia gedeutet aus ihrer Zeit und ihrer Wirkung auf die Physik, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert, A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature, in The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, London: W. Johnston et al., 1772, vol. IV.Google Scholar

Broackes, Justin, “Substance,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (2005–6), 131–66.Google Scholar

Broughton, Janet, “Hume's Ideas about Necessary Connection,” Hume Studies 13 (1987), 217–44.Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd, “History of Science and Criteria of Choice,” in Stuewer, Roger (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. V, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd,“Explanation and Gravity,” in Teich, Mikulas and Young, Robert (eds.), Changing Perspectives in the History of Science, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973.Google Scholar

Cantor, G. N. and Hodge, M. J. S. (eds.), Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, 1740–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf, Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, New York: Basic Books, 1966.Google Scholar

Carriero, John, “Newton on Space and Time: Comments on J. E. McGuire,” in Bricker, Phillip and Hughes, R. I. G. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Casini, Paolo, “Newton: The Classical Scholia,” History of Science 22 (1984), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charleton, Walter, Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana, London: 1654.Google Scholar

Clarke, Desmond, Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel, A Demonstration of the being and attributes of God, ed. Vailati, Ezio, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Samuel and Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, A collection of papers, which passed between the late learned Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Clarke, in the years of 1715 and 1716, London: Printed for James Knapton, 1717.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard, “Roemer and the First Determination of the Velocity of Light (1676),” Isis 31 (1940), 327–79.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“‘Quantum in se est’: Newton's Concept of Inertia in Relation to Descartes and Lucretius,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 19 (1964), 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“Hypotheses in Newton's Philosophy,” Physis. Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza 8 (1966), 163–84.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“Isaac Newton's Principia, the Scriptures, and the Divine Providence,” in Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard, Introduction to Newton's “Principia,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard, The Newtonian Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“Newton's Copy of Leibniz's Théodicée,” Isis 73 (1982), 410–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“Newton and Descartes,” in Belgioioso, Giuliaet al. (eds.), Descartes. Il metodo e i saggi, Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1990.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“The Review of the First Edition of Newton's Principia in the Acta Eruditorum, With Notes on the Other Reviews,” in Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, Alan (eds.), The Investigation of Difficult Things: Essays on Newton and the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of D. T. Whiteside, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard,“Newton's Concepts of Force and Mass,” in Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard and Koyré, Alexandre, “The Case of the Missing Tanquam: Leibniz, Newton and Clarke,” Isis 52 (1961), 555–66.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard and Koyré, Alexandre,“Newton and the Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence,” Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences 15 (1962), 63–126.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Costabel, Pierre, “Newton's and Leibniz' Dynamics,” in Palter, Robert (ed.), The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, 1666–1966, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Costello, William, The Scholastic Curriculum at Early Seventeenth-Century Cambridge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew, “How the Principia Got its Name; or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously,” History of Science 29 (1991), 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew,“The Identity of Natural Philosophy: A Response to Edward Grant,” Early Science and Medicine 5 (2000), 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danielson, Dennis, “Scientist's Birthright,” Nature 410 (26 April 2001), 1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Gandt, François, Force and Geometry in Newton's “Principia,” trans. Wilson, Curtis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

De Gandt, François,“Newton's Nature: Does Newton's Science Disclose Actual Knowledge of Nature?” St. John's Review 45 (1999), 7–19.Google Scholar

De Pierris, Graciela, “Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy,” Hume Studies, Forthcoming.

Densmore, Dana, “Cause and Hypothesis: Newton's Speculation about the Cause of Universal Gravitation,” St. John's Review 45 (1999), 94–111.Google Scholar

Densmore, Dana, Newton's Principia: The Central Argument, 3rd edn, Santa Fe: Green Lion Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Des Maizeaux, Pierre, Recueil de diverses pieces, sur la philosophie, la religion naturelle, l'histoire, les mathematiques, &c., Amsterdam: Chez H. Du Sauzet, 1720.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, Principia Philosophiae, in Œuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul, vol. VIII-1, Paris: Vrin, 1982.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, Principes, in Œuvres de Descartes, ed. and trans. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul, vol. IX-2, Paris: Vrin, 1989.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, Principles of Philosophy, trans. and ed. , V. R. and Miller, R. P., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.Google Scholar

DiSalle, Robert, “Newton's Philosophical Analysis of Space and Time,” in Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

DiSalle, Robert, Understanding Space–Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter, “Newton's Rejection of the Mechanical Aether,” in Donovan, Arthuret al. (eds.), Scrutinizing Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988.Google Scholar

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter, The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter,“Newton as Final Cause and First Mover,” Isis 85 (1994), 633–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domski, Mary, “The Constructible and the Intelligible in Newton's Philosophy of Geometry,” Philosophy of Science 70 (2003), 1114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downing, Lisa, “Locke's Newtonianism and Lockean Newtonianism,” Perspectives on Science 5 (1997), 285–310.Google Scholar

Downing, Lisa,“The Status of Mechanism in Locke's Essay,” The Philosophical Review 107 (1998), 381–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, Pierre, Sozein ta Phainomena. Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée. Paris: A. Hermann, 1908.Google Scholar

Edleston, J. (ed.), Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton and Professor Cotes, London, 1850.Google Scholar

Evans, Melbourne, “Newton and the cause of gravity,” American Journal of Physics 26 (1958), 619–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, Mordechai, The Newtonian Moment: Isaac Newton and the Making of Modern Culture, New York and Oxford: New York Public Library and Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1961.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul, All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael, “Kant and Newton: Why Gravity is Essential to Matter,” in Bricker, Phillip and Hughes, R. I. G. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael,“Kant on Science and Experience,” in Mercer, Christia and O'Neill, Eileen (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael,“Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science,” in Bird, Graham (ed.), A Companion to Kant, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael,“Newton and Kant on Absolute Space:  From Theology to Transcendental Philosophy,” in Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., and Petitot, J. (eds.), Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Approaches to Modern Physics, Berlin: Springer, forthcoming.

Friedman, Michael,Kant's Construction of Nature, unpublished manuscript.

Funkenstein, Amos, Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan, “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton,” in Gavkroger, Stephen (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan,“Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646–1671),” in Lennon, Thomaset al. (eds.), Problems of Cartesianism, Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan,“Newton, Active Powers, and the Mechanical Philosophy,” in Bernard Cohen, I. and Smith, George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Gagnebin, Bernard, “De la cause de la Pesanteur. Mémoire de Nicolas Fatio de Duillier,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 6 (1949), 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Daniel, Descartes' Metaphysical Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel,“Descartes, Mechanics, and the Mechanical Philosophy,” in French, Peter, Wettstein, Howard, and Silver, Bruce (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XXVI, Boston: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel,“Physics and Foundations,” in Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, vol. III: Early Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Goclenius, Rodolphus, Lexicon Philosophicum, Frankfurt, 1613.Google Scholar

Grant, Edward, “God and Natural Philosophy: The Late Middle Ages and Sir Isaac Newton,” Early Science and Medicine 5 (2000), 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, Edward, A History of Natural Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

s'Gravesande, W. James, Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy, trans. by Desaguliers, J. T., London: W. Innyset al., 1747.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Niccolò, Reading the Principia: The Debate on Newton's Mathematical Methods for Natural Philosophy from 1687 to 1736, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, A. Rupert, “Newton and the Absolutes,” in Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, Alan (eds.), The Investigation of Difficult Things: Essays on Newton and the History of the Exact Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hanson, Norwood Russell, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Hanson, Norwood Russell, Perception and Discovery: An Introduction to Scientific Inquiry, San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Company, 1969.Google Scholar

Hanson, Norwood Russell,“Hypotheses Fingo,” in Butts, Robert and Davis, John (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Harman, P. M, Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy: The Problem of Substance in Classical Physics, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Harper, William, “Reasoning from Phenomena: Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation and the Practice of Science,” in Theerman, Paul and Seeff, Adele (eds.), Action and Reaction: Proceedings of a Symposium to Commemorate the Tercentenary of Newton's Principia, London: Associated University Presses, 1993.Google Scholar

Harper, William and Smith, George, “Newton's New Way of Inquiry,” in Leplin, Jarrett (ed.), The Creation of Ideas in Physics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom, Matter and Method, New York: Macmillan, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, John, The Library of Isaac Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Hatfield, Gary, “Metaphysics and the New Science,” in Lindberg, David and Westman, Robert (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hatfield, Gary,“Was the Scientific Revolution a Revolution in Science?” in Ragep, F. Jamil and Ragep, Sally (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996.Google Scholar

Hatfield, Gary, Descartes and the “Meditations,”London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Heilbron, J. L., Elements of Early Modern Physics, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Henry, John, “‘Pray do not ascribe that notion to me’: God and Newton's Gravity,” in Force, James and Popkin, Richard (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar

Herivel, John, The Background to Newton's Principia: A Study of Newton's Dynamical Researches in the Years 1664–1684, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary, Forces and Fields: The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of Physics, London: Nelson, 1961.Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary,“Comment on Howard Stein's ‘On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond,’” in Stuewer, Roger (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. V, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Hiscock, W. G. (ed.) David Gregory, Isaac Newton, and their Circle: Extracts from David Gregory's Memoranda, 1677–1708, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937.Google Scholar

Holton, Gerald, Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1952.Google Scholar

Hutchison, Keith, “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?” Isis 73 (1982), 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan, “An Extract of a letter lately written by an ingenious person from Paris,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (no. 96), 21 July 1673, 6086–7.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan, Œuvres complètes, ed. Vollgraff, Johan Adriaan, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1888–1950.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan, The Pendulum Clock, or geometrical demonstrations concerning the motion of pendula as applied to clocks, trans. Blackwell, Richard J., Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan,Discours sur la cause de la Pesanteur (1690), in Œuvres complètes, vol. XXI; annotated and trans. Karen Bailey and George Smith as Discourse on the Cause of Gravity (unpublished manuscript).

Jacob, Margaret, “Christianity and the Newtonian Worldview,” in Lindberg, David and Numbers, Ronald (eds.), God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Jammer, Max, Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Jammer, Max, Concepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of Dynamics, New York: Harper, 1962.Google Scholar

Jammer, Max, Concepts of Mass in Contemporary Physics and Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Janiak, Andrew, “Space, Atoms and Mathematical Divisibility in Newton,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (2000), 203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janiak, Andrew,“Newton's Philosophy,” in Zalta, Edward (editor-in-chief), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2006 edition (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/).Google Scholar

Janiak, Andrew,“Newton and the Reality of Force,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007), 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joy, Lynn, “Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature,” in Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, vol. III: Early Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. Königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin: Reimer, 1910–.Google Scholar

Koyré, Alexandre, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Koyré, Alexandre, Newtonian Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Lange, Marc, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics: Locality, Fields, Energy, and Mass, Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, “A letter of M. Leibnitz to M. Hartsoeker,” Memoirs of Literature 3 (1722 – reprint of 1712 edition), 453–60.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm,“A second letter of M. Leibnitz to M. Hartsoeker, dated July 12, 1711,” Memoirs of Literature 5 (1722 – reprint of 1712 edition), 62–5.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Die mathematische Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C., Berlin: A. Asher, 1849–.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Philosophical Essays, trans. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C., Berlin: Weidmann, 1890.Google Scholar

Locke, John, The Works of John Locke, in nine volumes, 9th edn, London, 1794.Google Scholar

Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

LoLordo, Antonia, Pitrre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

McCann, Edwin, “Lockean Mechanism,” in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E., “Newton's ‘Principles of Philosophy’: An Intended Preface for the 1704 Opticks and a Related Draft Fragment,” British Journal for the History of Science 5 (1970), 178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, J. E.,“Atoms and the ‘Analogy of Nature’: Newton's Third Rule of Philosophizing,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 1 (1970), 3–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, J. E.,“Boyle's Conception of Nature,” Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (1972), 523–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGuire, J. E.,“Newton on Place, Time and God: An Unpublished Source,” British Journal for the History of Science 11 (1978), 114–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, J. E.,“Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God's Space and Time,” in Bricker, Phillip and Hughes, R. I. G. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E.,“Natural Motion and its Causes: Newton on the ‘vis insita’ of bodies,” in Gill, Mary Louise and Lennox, James (eds.), Self-motion: From Aristotle to Newton, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E., Tradition and Innovation: Newton's Metaphysics of Nature, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E. and Rattansi, P. M., “Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan,’” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 21 (1966), 108–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, Ernan, Newton on Matter and Activity, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan,“The Significance of Newton's Principia for Empiricism,” in Osler, Margaret and Farber, Paul Lawrence (eds.), Religion, Science and Worldview: Essays in Honor of Richard Westfall, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan,“The Explanation of Distant Action: Historical Notes,” in Cushing, James and McMullin, Ernan (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theory, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan,“The Impact of Newton's Principia on the Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy of Science 68 (2001), 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, Ernan,“The Origins of the Field Concept in Physics,” Physics in Perspective 4 (2002), 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maclaurin, Colin, An Account of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophical Discoveries in Four Books, London, 1748.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Maurice, Philosophy, Science and Sense Perception, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Mandelbrote, Scott, “Isaac Newton and Thomas Burnet: Biblical Criticism and the Crisis of Late Seventeenth-century England,” in Force, James and Popkin, Richard (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar

Maxwell, James Clerk, The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, ed. Niven, W. D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1890.Google Scholar

Metzger, Hélène, Attraction universelle et religion naturelle chez quelques commentateurs anglais de Newton, Paris: Hermann et cie, 1938.Google Scholar

More, Henry, An Antidote Against Atheism, London: J. Flesher, 1655.Google Scholar

More, Henry, Immortality of the Soul, so farre forth as it is demonstrable from the knowledge of nature and the light of reason, London: J. Flesher, 1659.Google Scholar

More, Henry, A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings, London: J. Flesher, 1662.Google Scholar

Nagel, Ernest, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.Google Scholar

Nelson, Alan, “Micro-Chaos and Idealization in Cartesian Physics,” Philosophical Studies 77 (1995), 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Questiones Quædam Philosophicæ, University Library, Cambridge, MSS Add. 3996; copy in Newton Papers of Indiana University, 1664.

Newton, Isaac,De Gravitatione et Aequipondio Fluidorum, University Library, Cambridge, MSS Add. 4003; copy in Newton Papers of Indiana University, date unknown.

Newton, Isaac,“A Letter of Mr. Isaac Newton, Professor of the Mathematicks in the University of Cambridge; containing his New Theory about Light and Colors,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 6 (February 1672), 3075–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, London: Royal Society, 1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Opticks, Or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, 2nd English edn, London: Printers to the Royal Society, 1717.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Motte, Andrew, London: Benjamin Motte, 1729.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, De Mundi Systemate, London: J. Tonsonet al., 1731.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, A Treatise of the System of the World, 2nd edn, trans. unknown, London: F. Fayram, 1731.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac,Principes mathématiques de la philosophie naturelle, trans. Chatelet, Madame la Marquise du, with Exposition Abregége du Systeme du Monde, et explication des principaux phénomenes astronomiques tirée des principes de M. Newton, by Châtelet, and Clairaut, , Paris: Desaint & Saillant, 1749.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Four Letters from Sir Isaac Newton to Doctor Bentley, London: R. and J. Dodsley, 1756.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Isaaci Newtoni Opera quae exstant omnia, ed. Horsley, Samuel, London: J. Nichols, 1779–85.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Opticks, Or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, based on the fourth edition of 1730, New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, ed. Bernard Cohen, I. and Schofield, Robert, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, ed. Turnbull, H. W.et al., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959–77.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World, the Andrew Motte translation [1729] rev. and ed. Cajori, Florian, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Hall, A. R. and Hall, Marie Boas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Whiteside, D. T., with the assistance of Hoskin, M. A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967–81.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, ed. Koyré, Alexandre and Cohen, I. Bernard, with Whitman, Anne, the 3rd edn with variant readings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton's Trinity Notebook, ed. McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, Martin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton, vol. I, ed. Shapiro, Alan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Newton: Philosophical Writings, ed. Janiak, Andrew, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Normore, Calvin, “What is to be Done in the History of Philosophy,” Topoi 25 (2006), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pampusch, Anita, Isaac Newton's Notion of Scientific Explanation, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame, 1972.

Putnam, Hilary, Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohault, Jacques, Physica, London: Jacobi Knapton, 1697 (includes Samuel Clarke's Annotata).Google Scholar

Rohault, Jacques, System of natural philosophy: illustrated with Dr. Samuel Clarke's notes, taken mostly out of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy, trans. Clarke, John, London: James Knapton, 1723.Google Scholar

Rosenberger, Ferdinand, Isaac Newton und seine physikalischen Principien, Leipzig: Barth, 1895.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Donald, “Innovation and Orthodoxy in Early Modern Philosophy,” in Rutherford, Donald (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rynasiewicz, Robert, “By Their Properties, Causes and Effects: Newton's Scholium on Space, Time Place and Motion – I. The Text,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26 (1995), 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rynasiewicz, Robert,“By Their Properties, Causes and Effects: Newton's Scholium on Space, Time, Place and Motion – II. The Context,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26 (1995), 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabra, A. I., Theories of Light from Descartes to Newton, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Sanford, David, “Locke, Leibniz and Wiggins on Being in the Same Place at the Same Time,” The Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schliesser, Eric and Smith, George, “Huygens's 1688 Report to the Directors of the Dutch East Indian Company on the Measurement of Longitude at Sea and the Evidence it Offered Against Universal Gravity,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences (forthcoming).

Sellars, Wilfrid, “Philosophy and the scientific image of man,” in Science, Perception, and Reality, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Alan, Fits, Passions and Paroxysms: Physics, Method, and Chemistry and Newton's Theories of Colored Bodies and Fits of Easy Reflection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sklar, Larry, “Physics, Metaphysics and Method in Newton's Dynamics,” in Gale, Richard (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, George, Lecture Notes on the Newtonian Revolution, Medford, MA: Department of Philosophy, Tufts University, 2000.Google Scholar

Smith, George,“Comment on Ernan McMullin's ‘The Impact of Newton's Principia on the Philosophy of Science,’” Philosophy of Science 68 (2001), 327–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, George,“The Methodology of the Principia,” in Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, George,“From the Phenomenon of the Ellipse to an Inverse-Square Force: Why Not?” in Malament, David (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics, Chicago: Open Court Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Snobelen, Stephen, “‘The True Frame of Nature’: Isaac Newton, Heresy, and the Reformation of Natural Philosophy,” in Brooke, John and Maclean, Ian (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard, “Newtonian Space–Time,” in Palter, Robert (ed.), The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, 1666–1966, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard,“On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond,” in Stuewer, Roger (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. V, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard,“On Locke, ‘the Great Huygenius, and the incomparable Mr. Newton,’” in Bricker, Phillip and Hughes, R. I. G. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard,“‘From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature’: Hypothesis or Deduction?” Philosophy of Science Association 2 (1990), 209–22.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard,“On Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XVIII, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard,“Newton's Metaphysics,” in Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Steinle, Friedrich, Newtons Entwurf “Über die Gravitation.” Ein stück entwicklungsgeschichte seiner mechanik, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick, “Descartes and the Problem of Action at a Distance,” Journal of the History of Ideas 15 (1954), 146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voltaire, , Eléments de la philosophie de Newton, Paris, 1738.Google Scholar

Warren, Daniel, “Kant's Dynamics,” in Watkins, Eric (ed.), Kant and the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Westfall, Richard S., Force in Newton's Physics, New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar

Westfall, Richard, Never at Rest, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Wilson, Margaret, Ideas and Mechanism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolhouse, Roger, “Locke and the Nature of Matter,” in Mercer, Christia and O'Neill, Eileen (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar