Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:10:09.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

C. W. Marshall
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, K. 1955. Die Plautusprologe. Mülheim-Ruhr.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Allen, W. 1959. ‘Stage Money (fabam mimum, Cic. Att. I, 16, 13)’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 40: 1–8.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus' Roman Comedy. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. 1993. Scripts and Scenarios: The Performance of Comedy in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, P. D. 1961. ‘Greek Drama and the Modern Stage’, in Arrowsmith, W. and Shattuck, R. (eds.), The Craft and Context of Translation, 113–28. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1967. ‘The Disassociated Actor’, in Beede, G. L. (ed.), Greek Drama: A Collection of Festival Papers, 40–51. Vermillion, Dakota Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1968. ‘Alexis and the Parasite's Name’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 9: 161–68.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1989. ‘Gorgias’ Exit at Menander, Dyskolos 381–92', Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 76: 3–5.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1995. ‘Amorous Scenes in Plautus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 1–17.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1996a. Menander II. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1996b. Alexis, The Fragments: A Commmentary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G.1997. ‘Love Scenes in Plautus’, in Axer, J. and Görler, W. (eds.), Scaenica Saravi-Varsoviensia, 111–22. Warsaw, DiG.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (ed.). 2001. Studien zu Plautus' Epidicus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Babbitt, F. C. 1927. Plutarch: Moralia, vol. I. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, T. 1998. ‘Les Captifs: Eine Plautus-Nachahmung Jean Rotrous’, in Benz and Lefèvre (1998) 165–93.
Baier, T. 1999a. Studien zu Plautus' Amphitruo. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Baier, T.1999b. ‘“On ne peut faillir en l'imitant”: Rotrous Sosies, eine Nachgestaltung des plautinischen Amphitruo’, in Baier (1999a) 203–37.
Baier, T. 2004. Studien zu Plautus' Poenulus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bain, D. 1977. Actors and Audience: A Study of Asides and Related Conventions in Greek Drama. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bain, D.1979. ‘Plautus vortit barbare’, in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, 17–34. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, E. and Savarese, N.. 1991. A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. 1970. ‘Plauto e il metateatro antico’, Il Verri 31: 113–30.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. 1982. ‘Actors and Act-Divisions: Some Questions of Adaptation in Roman Comedy’, Antichthon 16: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsby, J. 1986. Plautus: Bacchides. Oak Park, IL, Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar
Barsby, J.1995. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus as Improvisatory Drama', in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 55–70.
Barsby, J. 1999. Terence: Eunuchus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsby, J. 2001. Terence, 2 vols. I: The Woman of Andros, The Self-tormentor, The Eunuch. II: Phormio, The Mother-in-Law, The Brothers. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, I. M. 1972. ‘Tranio's Laconian Key’, Greece and Rome 19: 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beacham, R. C. 1991. The Roman Theatre and its Audience. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beare, W. 1964. The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic, 3rd edn. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. 1997. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd edn. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Benz, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.). 1998. Maccus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität der Captivi des Plautus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Berendt, J. E. 1992. The Jazz Book: From Ragtime to Fusion and Beyond. 6th edn, rev. Gunther Huesmann. New York, Lawrence Hill.Google Scholar
Bergk, T. 1872. ‘Ueber einige Zeichen der Plautinischen Handscriften’, Philologus 31: 229–46.Google Scholar
Bernabò-Brea, L. 1981. Menandro e il teatro greco nelle terracotte liparesi. Geneva, SAGEP.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. 1998. Ludi publici: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1961. The History of the Greek and Roman Theater, 2nd edn. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boldrini, S. 1984. Gli anapesti di Plauto. Urbino, Pubblicazioni dell'Università di Urbino.Google Scholar
Bonaria, M. 1965. Romani Mimi. Rome, In Aedibus Athenaei.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. 1992. From Text to Performance in the Elizabethan Theatre. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, J. R. 1992. Kabuki: Five Classic Plays. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Braun, L. 1970. Die Cantica des Plautus. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 1981. A Commentary on Livy, Books XXXIV–XXXVII. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brook, P. 1968. The Empty Space. New York, Atheneum.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1987. ‘Masks, Names, and Characters in New Comedy’, Hermes 115: 181–201.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1990. ‘Plots and Prostitutes in Greek New Comedy’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 6: 241–66.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1992. ‘Menander, Fragments 745 and 746 K-T, Menander's Kolax and Parasites and Flatterers in Greek Comedy’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 92: 91–107.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M.1993. ‘The Skinny Virgins of Terence, Eunuchus 313–17’, in Jocelyn, H. D. and Hunt, H. (eds.), Tria Lustra, 229–34. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1995. ‘Aeschinus at the Door: Terence Adelphoe 632–43 and the Traditions of Greco-Roman Comedy’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 71–89.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M.2002. ‘Actors and Actor-managers at Rome in the Time of Plautus and Terence’, in Easterling and Hall (2002) 225–37.
Buck, C. H. J. 1940. A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. 1975. ‘The Size of the Chorus in Seneca's Agamemnon’, Classical Philology 70: 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, T. F. 1963. P. Terenti Afri Hecyra. Pretoria, The Classical Association of Rhodesia and Nyasaland.Google Scholar
Chalmers, W. R. 1965. ‘Plautus and His Audience’, in Dorley, T. A. and Dudley, D. R. (eds.), Roman Drama, 21–50. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Chiarini, G. 1989. ‘La rappresentazione teatrale’, in Cavallo, P. F. G. and Giardina, A. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. II: 127–214. Rome, Salerno.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. 2000. Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (ed.). 2000. Riffs and Choruses: A New Jazz Anthology. London, Continuum.Google Scholar
Clark, J. R. 2001–02. ‘Early Latin Handwriting and Plautus’ “Pseudolus” ', Classical Journal 97: 183–89.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1977. ‘Public Building in Rome between the Second Punic War and Sulla’, Papers of the British School at Rome 45: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1983. Il foro Romano, vol. I: Periodo arcaico. Rome, Quasar.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1985. Il foro Romano, vol. II: Periodo repubblicano e augusteo. Rome, Quasar.Google Scholar
Cohee, P. 1994. ‘Instauratio sacrorum’, Hermes 122: 451–68.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. R. 1999. Role Doubling as a Dramatic Technique in Greek Tragedy. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Collart, J. 1970. ‘Le soldat qui ne chante pas (quelques remarques sur le rôle du miles chez Plaute)’, in Mélanges M. Durry(Revue des Etudes Latines 47 bis), 199–208. Paris.Google Scholar
Conrad, C. C. 1915. The Technique of Continuous Action in Roman Comedy. Dissertation, Menasha.Google Scholar
Corbett, P. 1986. The Scurra. Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cotticelli, F., Heck, A. G., and Heck, T. F.. 2001. The Commedia dell'Arte in Naples: A Bilingual Edition of the 176 Casamarciano Scenarios, 2 vols. Lanham, MD and London, The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Craig, E. G. 1911. On the Art of the Theatre. London.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 1987. ‘Is the Threat-monologue of the Servus currens an Index of Roman Authorship?’, Phoenix 41: 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. 1989. ‘Plautine Elements in the Running-slave Entrance Monologues?’, Classical Quarterly 39: 148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. 1993. ‘A Case Study in the Use of Theatre Iconography as Evidence for Ancient Acting’, Antike Kunst 36: 41–58.Google Scholar
Csapo, E.2004. ‘The Politics of the New Music’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of ‘Mousike’ in the Classical Athenian City, 207–48. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. and Slater, W. J.. 1995. The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, I. C. 1971. Herodas' Mimiamboi. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damen, M. 1985. The Comedy of Diphilos Sinopeus in Plautus, Terence, and Athenaeus. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Damen, M. 1988. ‘Actors and Act-Divisions in the Greek Original of Plautus’ Menaechmi', Classical World 82: 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. 1989. ‘Actor and Character in Greek Tragedy’, Theatre Journal 41: 316–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. 1992. ‘Translating Scenes: Plautus’ Adaptation of Menander's Dis Exapaton', Phoenix 46: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. 1995. ‘Actor, Character and Role in Chrysalus’ Trojan Aria (Bacchides 925–978)', Text and Presentation 16: 24–31.Google Scholar
Danese, R. 1999. ‘I meccanismi scenici dell'Asinaria’, in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.), Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates, vol. II: Asinaria, 49–95. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Davis, C. B. 2003. ‘Distant Ventriloquism: Vocal Mimesis, Agency and Identity in Ancient Greek Performance’, Theatre Journal 55: 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorio, A. 2000. Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzi, A. 1952. Cronologia ed evoluzione Plautina. Naples.Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1975. ‘Maschere e personaggi in Plauto’, Dioniso 46: 163–93.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. 2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin, de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, H. 1999. ‘Amusing the Masses: Buildings for Entertainment and Leisure in the Roman World’, in Potter, D. S. and Mattingly, D. J. (eds.), Life, Death, and Entertainment in the Roman Empire, 205–55. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dodwell, C. R. 2000. Anglo-Saxon Gestures and the Roman Stage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duchartre, P. L. 1966. The Italian Comedy, trans. Weaver, R. T.. New York, Dover.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1936. ‘The Dramatic Function of the Seruus currens in Roman Comedy’, Classical Studies Presented to Edward Capps, 93–102. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1940. Epidicus. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton, Princeton University Press. (2nd edn, 1994, with a Foreword and Bibliographical Appendix by R. Hunter. Norman, OK (= Duckworth (1952) and Hunter (1994)).Google Scholar
Dumont, J. -C. 1997. ‘Cantica et espace de représentation dans le théâtre latin’, in Guen, B. (ed.), De la scène aux gradins (PALLAS 47), 41–50. Toulouse, Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.). 2002. Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elm, D. 2001. ‘Plautus’ Persa und Della Portas Trappolaria', in Faller (2001) 287–301.Google Scholar
Enk, P. J. 1932. Mercator. Leiden, A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. 1932–61. Plaute, Comédies, 7 vols. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Faller, S. (ed.). 2001. Studien zu Plautus' Persa. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1965. ‘The Curculio of Plautus: An Illustration of Plautine Methods in Adaptation’, Classical Quarterly 15: 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1968. ‘Terence, Diphilus and Menander: A Reexamination of Terence Adelphoe act II’, Philologus 112: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1975. ‘Sex, Status, and Survival in Hellenistic Athens: A Study of Women in New Comedy’, Phoenix 29: 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1982. ‘Quintilian on Performance: Traditional and Personal Elements in Institutio 11.3’, Phoenix 36: 243–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1989. ‘Mime: The Missing Link in Roman Literary History’, Classical World 82–3: 155–68.Google Scholar
Fantham, E.2002. ‘Orator and/et actor’, in Easterling and Hall (2002) 362–76.
Feather, L. G. 1965. The Book of Jazz, From Then till Now. New York, Horizon.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. H. 1992. Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context. Bloomginton, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. 1995. The Relationship of Oral and Literate Performance Processes in the Commedia Dell'Arte: Beyond the Improvisation/Memorisation Divide. Lewiston, Edwin Mellon.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1960. Elementi Plautini in Plauto, trans. Munari, F.. Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 1932. ‘Two Notes on Plautus’, American Journal of Philology 53: 243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, G. F. 2004. ‘Ensemble Scenes in Plautus’, American Journal of Philology 125: 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frassinetti, P. 1967. Atellanae Fabulae. Rome, in Aedibus Athenaei.Google Scholar
Frost, A. and Yarrow, R.. 1990. Improvisation in Drama. New York, St Martin's.Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. 1972. ‘Zur Eigenart der römischen Komödie. Plautus und Terenz gegenüber ihren griechischen Vorbildern’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. I: 2, 1027–1113. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garton, C. 1972. Personal Aspects of the Roman Theatre. Toronto, Hakkert.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. 1979. Theatrical Performances in the Ancient World: Hellenistic and Early Roman Theatre. Amsterdam, J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1977. ‘The Mask of the Pseudokore’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 18: 247–50.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1978. ‘Where did the Audience Go?’, Scripta Classica Israelica 4: 45–49.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1980. ‘The Concept of the bona meretrix: A Study of Terence's Courtesans’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 108: 142–65.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1981. ‘Who's Afraid of Rope-Walkers and Gladiators? (Ter. Hec. 1–57)’, Athenaeum 59: 29–37.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1985–88. ‘How Rich was Terence?’, Scripta Classica Israelica 8–9: 74–78.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1989. ‘The First Realistic Roles in European Theatre: Terence's Prologues’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 62: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilula, D. 1993. ‘The Crier's Routine (Plaut. Asin. 4–5; Poen. 11–5)’, Athenaeum 81: 283–87.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1996. ‘Choragium and Choragos’, Athenaeum 84: 479–92.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 1978. ‘Plautus’ Epidicus and the Case of the Missing Original', Transactions of the American Philological Association 108: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M.1995. ‘Improvisation, Plot, and Plautus’ Curculio', in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 33–41.
Goldberg, S. M. 1998. ‘Plautus in the Palatine’, Journal of Roman Studies 88: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M.2004. ‘Plautus and his Alternatives: Textual Doublets in Cistellaria’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004) 385–98.
Goold, G. P. 1959. ‘First Thoughts on the Dyscolus’, Phoenix 13: 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. 1983. Lazzi: The Comedy Routines of the Commedia dell'Arte. New York, Performing Arts Journal Publications.Google Scholar
Götte, K. 2001. ‘Plautus’ Persa als Inspiration für John Lylys Mother Bombie', in Faller (2001) 273–86.
Gow, A. S. F. 1912. ‘On the Use of Masks in Roman Comedy’, Journal of Roman Studies 2: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, F. 1991. ‘Gestures and Conventions: The Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators’, in Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.), A Cultural History of Gesture from Antiquity to the Present Day, 36–58. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1973. ‘TITVS MACCIVS PLAUTVS’, Classical Quarterly 23: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S.1982. ‘Drama’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. II: Latin Literature, 77–137. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1993. Plautus: Menaechmi. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1999. Terence: The Brothers, 2nd edn. Warminster, Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Green, J. R. 1997. ‘Deportment, Costume and Naturalism in Comedy’, Pallas 47: 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. R.2006. ‘The Persistent Phallos: Regional Variability in the Performance Style of Comedy’, in Davidson, F. M. J. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Greek Drama III: Papers for Kevin Lee, 141–62. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S.. 1903. ‘413. Farce and Mime’, Oxyrhynchus Papyri 3: 41–57.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gurlitt, L. 1921. Erotica Plautina: Eine Auswahl erotischer Szenen aus Plautus. Munich, Georg Müller.Google Scholar
Gzowski, P. 1997. The Morningside Years CD (bound with The Morningside Years). Toronto, McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Halford, A. S. and Halford, G. M.. 1956. The Kabuki Handbook. Tokyo, C. E. Tuttle.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. 1965. The Dyskolos of Menander. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. 1968. Menander and Plautus: A Study in Comparison. London, H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. 1975. ‘Plautus and his Public: Some Thoughts on New Comedy in Latin’, Dioniso 46: 117–32.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. 1959. Roman Theater-Temples. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harsh, P. W. 1937. ‘Angiportum, Platea, and Vicus’, Classical Philology 32: 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.). 2004. Studien zu Plautus' Cistellaria. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Havet, L. 1905. ‘Etudes sur Plaute. Asinaria I: La Seconde et la troiscème scènes et la composition générale’, Revue de Philologie 29: 94–103.Google Scholar
Henke, R. 2002. Performance and Literature in the Commedia dell'Arte. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. 1976. ‘Remarques sur les praecones et le praeconium dans la Rome de la fin de la République’, Latomus 35: 730–46.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D., Kett, J. F. and Trefil, J. S.. 1987. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hoffer, C. 1877. De personarum usu in P. Terenti comoediis. Halle.Google Scholar
Hough, J. N. 1970. ‘Rapid Repartee in Roman Comedy’, Classical Journal 65: 162–67.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. 1962. Cicero. Brutus, Orator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 1991. ‘Acting Style in the Ancient World’, Theatre Notebook 41: 2–16.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1979. ‘The Comic Chorus in the Fourth Century’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 36: 23–38.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1985. The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L.1994. ‘Foreword and Bibliographical Appendix’, in Duckworth, G. E., The Nature of Roman Comedy, 2nd edn, iii and 465–71. Norman, Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Huys, M. 1993. ‘P. Oxy. LIII 3705: A Line from Menander's Periceiromene with Musical Notation’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 99: 30–32.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. 1962. Tacitus: The Histories. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1967. The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1984. ‘Anti-Greek Elements in Plautus’ Menaechmi?', Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4: 1–25.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1987. ‘Studies in the Indirect Tradition of Plautus’ Pseudolus (II)', Filologia e forme letterarie: Studi offerti a Francesco della Corte, vol. II: 57–72. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1993. Review of Zwierlein (1990), Gnomon 65: 122–37.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1996. Review of Zwierlein (1991a), Gnomon 68: 402–20.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D.2000. ‘The Unpretty Boy of Plautus’ Pseudolus (767–789)', in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.), Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre, 431–60. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1992. ‘Reflections of Inner Life: Masks and Masked Acting in Ancient Greek Tragedy and Japanese Noh Drama’, Modern Drama 35: 20–34.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. A. 1980. ‘Poenulus I, 2 and Roman Women’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 110: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, K. 1981. Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, corrected edn. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnstone, K. 1999. Impro for Storytellers. London, Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1989. Chuck Amuck: The Life and Times of an Animated Cartoonist. New York, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Jones, L. W. and Morey, C. R.. 1930–31. The Miniatures of the Manuscripts of Terence Prior to the Thirteenth Century, 2 vols. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jory, E. J. 1967. ‘PAIS KOMOIDOS and the DIA PANTON’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 14: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jory, E. J. 1986. ‘Gladiators in the Theatre’, Classical Quarterly 36: 537–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jory, E. J.1988. ‘Publilius Syrus and the Element of Competition in the Theatre of the Republic’, in Horsfall, N. (ed.), Vir Bonus Discendi Peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch's Eightieth Birthday, 73–81. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Kamel, W. 1951. ‘The Fabula Atellana and its Stock Characters’, Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, Cairo 13: 89–97.Google Scholar
Kauer, R. and Lindsay, W. M.. 1926. P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Reprinted, 1958, with additions by O. Skutsch.)Google Scholar
Kehoe, P. H. 1984. ‘The Adultery Mime Reconsidered’, in Bright, D. F. and Ramage, E. S. (eds.), Classical Texts and their Tradition: Studies in Honor of C. R. Trahnam, 89–106. Chico, CA, Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Keil, H. 1961. Grammatici Latini. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Ketterer, R. C. 1986a. ‘Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy I’, Semiotica 58: 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterer, R. C. 1986b. ‘Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy II’, Semiotica 59: 93–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterer, R. C. 1986c. ‘Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy III’, Semiotica 60: 29–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, T. J. 1992. Casting Shakespeare's Plays: London Actors and their Roles. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. 1970. ‘The Punic Speech of Hanno’, Orientalia 39: 52–74.Google Scholar
Kurrelmeyer, C. M. 1932. The Economy of Actors in Plautus. Graz, Deutsche Vereins-Druckerei.Google Scholar
Lange, D. 1973. ‘The Number of Slave Roles in Plautus’ Aulularia', Classical Philology 68: 62–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, H. H. 1922. Studies in the Songs of Plautine Comedy. Dissertation, Menasha.Google Scholar
Lecoq, J. 2001. The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1982. Maccus vortit barbare: Vom tragischen Amphitryon zum tragikomischen Amphitruo. Wiesbaden, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1995. Plautus und Philemon. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1997. Plautus' Pseudolus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E.1999. ‘Plautus’ Amphitruo zwischen Tragödie und Stegreifspiel', in Baier (1999) 11–50.
Lefèvre, E. 2001. Plautus' Aulularia. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1991. Plautus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität des Plautus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1981. The Lives of the Greek Poets. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2004. Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejay, P. A. A. 1925. Plaute. Paris, Boivin.Google Scholar
Leneaghan, J. O. 1969. A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De Haruspicum Responso. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1895–96. Plauti Comoediae, 2 vols. Berlin, Weidmann.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1897. Die plautinischen Cantica und die hellenistische Lyrik. Berlin, Weidmann.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1912. Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1900. The Captivi of Plautus. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1904. The Ancient Editions of Plautus. Oxford, J. Parker.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1904–05. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae, 2 vols. Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Revised, 1910, with addenda and corrigenda.)Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1922. Early Latin Verse. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
List, G. 1963. ‘The Boundaries of Speech and Song’, Ethnomusicology 7.1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llarena i Xibillè, M. 1994. Personae Plautinae. Barcelona, Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1989. ‘The virgo callida of Plautus, Persa’, Classical Quarterly 39: 390–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1990. ‘Plautus’ Choruses', Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 133: 274–97.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1992. ‘Aspects of Plautus’ Originality in the Asinaria', Classical Quarterly 42: 152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B.1995. ‘Plautus’ “Indoor Scenes” and Improvised Drama', in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 23–31.
Lowe, J. C. B. 1997. ‘Terence's Four-Speaker Scenes’, Phoenix 51: 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, N. J. 2000. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1959. ‘Von Terenz zu Menander’, Philologus 103: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1969. ‘Menander's Slaves: Their Names, Roles and Masks’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 100: 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1970. ‘Menander's Characters: Their Names, Roles and Masks’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 101: 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1971. ‘Menander's Old Men’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1972. ‘Menander's Soldiers: Their Names, Roles and Masks’, American Journal of Philology 93: 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1971. Aristophanes: Wasps. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1994. ‘The Number of Speaking Actors in Old Comedy’, Classical Quarterly 44: 325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maidment, K. J. 1935. ‘The Later Comic Chorus’, Classical Quarterly 29: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1993. ‘Status Transactions in Aristophanes’ Frogs', Text and Presentation 14: 57–61.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1994. ‘The Rules of Three Actors in Practice’, Text and Presentation 15: 53–61.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1996. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus: The Long and the Short of it', Text and Presentation 17: 34–38.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1997a. ‘Comic Technique and the Fourth Actor’, Classical Quarterly 47: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1997b. ‘Shattered Mirrors and Breaking Class: Saturio's Daughter in Plautus’ Persa', Text and Presentation 18: 100–09.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W.1998. ‘In Seneca's Wings’, in Bews, J. P., Storey, I. C. and Boyne, M. R. (eds.), Celebratio: Thirtieth Anniversary Essays at Trent University, 86–95. Peterborough, Ontario, Trent University.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1999a. ‘Quis Hic Loquitur? Plautine Delivery and the “Double Aside”’, Syllecta Classica 10: 105–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1999b. ‘Some Fifth-Century Masking Conventions’, Greece and Rome 46: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2000a. ‘Female Performers on Stage? (PhV 96 [RVP 2/33])’, Text and Presentation 21: 13–25.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W.2000b. ‘Location! Location! Location!: Choral Absence and Dramatic Space in Seneca's Troades’, in G. W. M. Harrison (ed.), Seneca in Performance, 27–51. Swansta.
Marshall, C. W. 2002. ‘Chorus, Metatheatre, and Dyskolos 427–441’, Scholia 11: 3–17.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2003. ‘Casting the Oresteia’, Classical Journal 98: 257–74.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2004. ‘Alcestis and the Ancient Rehearsal Process (P. Oxy. 4546)’, Arion 11.3: 28–45.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1957. ‘The Plautine didascaliae’, Athenaeum 35: 78–88.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1960. ‘The First Period of Plautine Revival’, Latomus 19: 230–52.Google Scholar
Maurach, G. 1988. Der Poenulus des Plautus. Heidelberg, Carl Winter.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1979. ‘Augustan Elegy and Mime’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Association 25: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeish, K. 1976. Roman Comedy. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
McMillin, S. and MacLean, S.. 1998. The Queen's Men and Their Plays. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyerhold, V. E. 1969. Meyerhold on Theatre, trans. Braun, E.. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. 1984. ‘The Political Character of the Classical Roman Republic’, Journal of Roman Studies 74: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, K. L. 2002. ‘Playing House: Stage, Space, and Domesticity in Plautus’ Mostellaria', Helios 29: 3–25.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1991. ‘Palliata togata: Plautus, Curculio 462–86’, American Journal of Philology 112: 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1994. ‘Seats and Social Status in the Plautine Theatre’, Classical Journal 90: 113–23.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1998a. ‘Music and Structure in Roman Comedy’, American Journal of Philology 119: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1998b. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1999. ‘Facing the Music: Character and Musical Accompaniment in Roman Comedy’, Syllecta Classica 10: 130–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J.2001a. ‘Music in Epidicus’, in Auhagen (2001) 313–34.
Moore, T. J.2001b. ‘Music in Persa’, in Faller (2001) 255–72.
Moore, T. J.2004a. ‘Music in a Quiet Play’, in Baier (2004) 139–61.
Moore, T. J.2004b. ‘Meter and Meaning in Cistellaria II’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004) 319–33.
Moore, T. J.forthcoming. Music in Roman Comedy.
Moorehead, . 1953–54. ‘The Distribution of Roles in Plautus’ Menaechmi', Classical Journal 49: 123–27.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. 1986. ‘Plautus and the Theatre of Disguise’, Classical Antiquity 5: 216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumann, M. 1976. ‘Literary Production and Reception’, New Literary History 8.1: 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, H. -G. 1985. Lukians Parasitendialog. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nettl, B. 1974. ‘Thoughts on Improvisation’, Musical Quarterly 60: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, A. 1931. Masks, Mimes, and Miracles: Studies in the Popular Theatre. London, George G. Harrap.Google Scholar
Nicolson, F. W. 1893. ‘The Use of Hercle (Mehercle), Edepol (Pol), Ecastor (Mecastor) by Plautus and Terence’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 4: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, P. 1917. Plautus II: Casina, the Casket Comedy, Curculio, Epidicus, The Two Menaechmuses. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, P. 1924. Plautus III: The Merchant, The Braggart Warrior, The Haunted House, The Persian. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X, vol. II (Books VII and VIII). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2001. ‘4546. Euripides, Alcestis 344–82 with Omissions’, Oxyrhynchus Papyri 67: 19–22.Google Scholar
Olson, K. 2003. ‘Roman Underwear Revisited’, Classical World 96: 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, S. 2002. The Authentic Shakespeare, and Other Problems of the Early Modern Stage. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. E. A. 1997. Rome and Carthage at Peace. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Pansièri, C. 1997. Plaute et Rome, ou, Les ambiguïtés d'un marginal. Brussels, Collection Latomus.Google Scholar
Paratore, E. 1959. ‘Il flautista nel DUSKOLOS e nello Pseudolus’, Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medievale 1: 310–25.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1989. ‘Crucially Funny, or Tranio on the Couch’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 119: 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelli, L. 1983. ‘L'Alcmena plautina, personaggio serio o parodico?’, Civiltà Classica e Cristiana 4: 383–94.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. E. 1985. ‘Alcumena in the Amphitruo of Plautus: A Pregnant Lady Joke’, Classical Journal 80: 121–26.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pietropaolo, D. (ed.). 1989. The Science of Buffonery: Theory and History of the Commedia Dell'Arte. Ottawa, Dovehouse.Google Scholar
Poe, J. P. 1996. ‘The Supposed Conventional Meanings of Dramatic Masks: A Re-examination of Pollux 4.133–54’, Philologus 140: 306–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. and West, M. L.. 2001. Documents of Ancient Greek Music: The Extant Melodies and Fragments. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R. 2004. ‘Aristophanes, Acharnians 1118–21’, Greece and Rome 51: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, D. S. 1999. Literary Texts and the Roman Historian. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Préaux, J. G. 1962. ‘Manducus’, in Renard, M. (ed.), Hommages à A. Grenier (Collection Latomus 58), 1282–91. Berchem-Brussels, Latomus.Google Scholar
Prehn, B. 1916. Quaestiones Plautinae. Breslau, Nischkowsky.Google Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1910. ‘Three Puer-Scenes in Plautus, and the Distribution of Rôles’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 21: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1923. ‘The Doubling of Rôles in Roman Comedy’, Classical Philology 18: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1932. ‘Criteria of Originality in Plautus’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 63: 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1934. Review of Kurrelmeyer (1932), Classical Philology 29: 350–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1937. ‘Silent Roles in Roman Comedy’, Classical Philology 32: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primmer, A. 1984. Handlungsgliederung in Nea und Palliata: Dis Exapaton und Bacchides. Vienna, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1983. ‘The apparitores: A Study in Social Mobility’, Papers of the British School at Rome 51: 125–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Questa, C. 1967. Introduzione alla metrica di Plauto. Bologna, R. Pàtron.Google Scholar
Questa, C. 1970. ‘Alcune strutture sceniche di Plauto e Menandro’, Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique XVI: Ménandre, 181–215. Geneva, Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Questa, C. 1995. Cantica: Titi Macci Plauti. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Questa, C. 2001. Casina. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Radice, B. 1976. Terence: the Comedies. New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
Rambo, E. F. 1915. ‘The Significance of the Wing-Entrances in Roman Comedy’, Classical Philology 10: 411–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, D. S. 1965. Latin Metre: An Introduction. London, Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1993. ‘Freedmen in Roman Comedy’, in Scodel, R. (ed.), Theater and Society in the Classical World, 215–33. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. 1992. Greek Tragic Theatre. New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, H. 1903. Der Mimus: ein Litterar-Entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Versuch. Berlin. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Reinach, T. 1919. ‘Tibia’, in Daremberg, C. and Saglio, E. (eds.), Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines V: 300–32. Paris, Hachette.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. W. 1946. ‘The Adultery Mime’, Classical Quarterly 40: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, K. and Richards, L.. 1990. The Commedia dell'Arte: A Documentary History. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. 1992. A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ringler, W. A. 1968. ‘The Number of Actors in Shakespeare's Early Plays’, in Bentley, G. E. (ed.), The Seventeenth-Century Stage: A Collection of Critical Essays, 110–34. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 1983. ‘The aduocati in the Poenulus and the piscatores in the Rudens’, Maia 35: 83–93.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 2000. ‘The Audiences of New Comedy’, Greece and Rome 47: 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D. 1975. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura, rev. M. F. Smith. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1968. ‘The Origin and Development of Republican Forums’, Phoenix 22: 304–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. A. 2001. Quintilian: The Orator's Education, vol. V (Books 11–12). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. and Cunningham, I. C.. 2002. Theophrastus: Characters; Herodas: Mimes; Sophron and Other Mime Fragments. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sage, E. T. 1935. Livy IX: Books XXXI–XXXIV. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salerno, H. F. (ed.). 1967. Scenarios of the Commedia dell'Arte: Flaminio Scala's ‘Il teatro delle favole rappresentative’. New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. 1982. ‘How Terence's Hecyra Failed’, Classical Quarterly 32: 134–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C. 1909. Costume in Roman Comedy. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. 1913. ‘The Site of Dramatic Performances at Rome in the Times of Plautus and Terence’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 44: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaaf, L. 1977. Der Miles gloriosus des Plautus und sein griechisches Original. Ein Beitrag zur Kontaminationsfrage. Munich, W. Fink.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. and Hosius, C.. 1927, repr. 1966. Geschichte der römischen Literatur, 3 vols. Munich, C. H. Beck'sche.Google Scholar
Schechner, R. 1969. Public Domain: Essays on the Theatre. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. 1931. ‘Meretrix’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 15.1: 1018–27.Google Scholar
Schönbeck, H. -P. 1981. Beiträge zur Interpretation der plautinischen ‘Bacchides’. Düsseldorf, Peter Mannhold.Google Scholar
Schumacher, C. 2000. ‘Would you Splash Out on a Ticket to Molière's Palais Royal?’, Theatre Research International 25: 248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutter, H. E. 1952. Quibus annis comoediae Plautinae primae actae sint quaeritur. Groningen, De Waal.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, W. B. 1925. ‘The Cantica of Plautus’, Classical Review 39: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, W. B. 1949. ‘Plautine Chronology’, American Journal of Philology 70: 376–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, E. 1975. ‘Perché Amphitruo’, Dioniso 46: 247–67.Google Scholar
Segal, E. 1987. Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus, 2nd edn. New York, Oxford University Press. (1st edn, 1968.)Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 2000. Valerius Maximus: Memorable Doings and Sayings. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sheets, G. A. 1983. ‘Plautus and Early Roman Tragedy’, Illinois Classical Studies 8: 195–209.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M. 1967. Studies in the History of Hellenistic Drama. London, Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M.1979. ‘Boy Actors in New Comedy’, in Bowerstock, G. W., Burkert, W. and Putnam, M. J. C. (eds.), Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to B. M. W. Knox, 199–208. Berlin, de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, A. 1983. ‘The Theatre and its Andvences’, in Sinfield, A. (ed.), Society and Literature 1945–1970, 173–97. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Skutsch, F. 1900. ‘Ein Prolog des Diphilos und eine Komödie des Plautus’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 55: 272–85.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W.1996. ‘Literacy and Old Comedy’, in I. Worthington (ed.), Voice into Text, 99–112. Leiden, Brill.
Slater, N. W. 2000. Plautus in Performance: the theatre of the Mind, 2nd edition. Amsterdam, Harwood Academic. (1st edn, Princeton University Press, 1985.)Google Scholar
Slater, N. W.2004. ‘Staging Literacy in Plautus’, in Mackie, C. J. (ed.), Oral Performance and its Context, 163–77. Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Smith, I. 1967. ‘Their Exits and Reentrances’, Shakespeare Quarterly 18: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. L. 1991. Plautus, Three Comedies: Miles Gloriosus, Pseudolus, Rudens. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, F. M. 1970. Blacks in Antiquity: Ethiopians in the Greco-Roman Experience. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spolin, V. 1983. Improvisation for the Theater: A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stambaugh, J. E. 1988. The Ancient Roman City. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stärk, E. 1989. Die Menaechmi des Plautus und kein griechisches Original. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Stern, T. 2004. Making Shakespeare: From Stage to Page. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tanner, R. G. 1969. ‘Problems in Plautus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 15: 95–105.Google Scholar
Tansey, P. 2001. ‘New Light on the Roman Stage: A Revival of Terence's Phormio Rediscovered’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 144: 22–43.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. 1993. Comic Angels and Other Approaches to Greek Drama through Vase-Paintings. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1935. ‘The Sellisternium and the Theatrical Pompa’, Classical Philology 30: 122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1937. ‘The Opportunities for Dramatic Performances in the Time of Plautus and Terence’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 68: 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1966. Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tobias, A. J. 1980. ‘Bacchiac Women and Iambic Slaves in Plautus’, Classical World 73: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trendall, A. D. 1967. Phlyax Vases, 2nd edn. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 1995. ‘Traditionen improvisierten Theaters bei Plautus’, in Zimmermann, B. (ed.), Griechisch-römische Komödie und Tragödie, 70–93. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G.2001. ‘Traditions of Theatrical Improvisation in Plautus: Some Considerations’, in Segal, E. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Menander, Plautus, and Terence, 95–106. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. 1970. Studies in Later Greek Comedy, 2nd edn. New York, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. 1995. Monuments Illustrating New Comedy, 3rd edn, revised and enlarged by J. R. Green and A. Seeberg, 2 vols. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Weinberger, W. 1892. ‘Beiträge zu den Bühenalterthümern aus Donats Terenzcommentar’, Wiener Studien 14: 120–30.Google Scholar
Weissinger, R. T. 1940. A Study of Act Divisions in Classical Drama. Scottdale, Mennonite Publishing House.Google Scholar
Welch, K. 1994. ‘The Roman Arena in Late-Republican Italy: A New Interpretation’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 7: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, K. 2003. ‘A New View of the Origins of the Roman Basilica: The Atrium Region, Graecostasis, and Roman Diplomacy’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessner, P. 1902–08. Aeli Donati Commentvm Terenti, 3 vols. Leipzig, Teubner.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1992. Ancient Greek Music. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiemken, H. 1972. Der griechische Mimus: Dokumente zur Geschichte des antiken Volkstheaters. Bremen, Carl Schünemann.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1989. ‘Marriage and Prostitution in Classical New Comedy’, in Redmond, J. (ed.), Themes in Drama. II: Women in Theatre, 31–48. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1991. The Masks of Menander: Sign and Meaning in Greek and Roman Performance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1997. Greek Theatre Performance: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. (ed.). 1987. Plautus: Pseudolus. Bristol, Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. 1995. ‘Plautus and the Epidicus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 19–29.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. M. 1938. The Clothing of the Ancient Romans. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, G. T. 1988. Shakespeare's Metrical Art. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the comoedia palliata. Rome, American Academy.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1993. Plautus' Curculio. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Wüst, E. 1932. ‘Mimus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 15.2: 1727–64.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. 1995. ‘The Impromptu Element in Plautus in the Light of the Evidence of New Comedy’, in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 71–86.
Zwierlein, O. 1990. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus I: Poenulus und Curculio. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1991a. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus II: Miles gloriosus. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1991b. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus III: Pseudolus. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1992. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus IV: Bacchides. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Abel, K. 1955. Die Plautusprologe. Mülheim-Ruhr.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Allen, W. 1959. ‘Stage Money (fabam mimum, Cic. Att. I, 16, 13)’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 40: 1–8.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus' Roman Comedy. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. 1993. Scripts and Scenarios: The Performance of Comedy in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, P. D. 1961. ‘Greek Drama and the Modern Stage’, in Arrowsmith, W. and Shattuck, R. (eds.), The Craft and Context of Translation, 113–28. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1967. ‘The Disassociated Actor’, in Beede, G. L. (ed.), Greek Drama: A Collection of Festival Papers, 40–51. Vermillion, Dakota Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1968. ‘Alexis and the Parasite's Name’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 9: 161–68.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1989. ‘Gorgias’ Exit at Menander, Dyskolos 381–92', Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 76: 3–5.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1995. ‘Amorous Scenes in Plautus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 1–17.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1996a. Menander II. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1996b. Alexis, The Fragments: A Commmentary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G.1997. ‘Love Scenes in Plautus’, in Axer, J. and Görler, W. (eds.), Scaenica Saravi-Varsoviensia, 111–22. Warsaw, DiG.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (ed.). 2001. Studien zu Plautus' Epidicus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Babbitt, F. C. 1927. Plutarch: Moralia, vol. I. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, T. 1998. ‘Les Captifs: Eine Plautus-Nachahmung Jean Rotrous’, in Benz and Lefèvre (1998) 165–93.
Baier, T. 1999a. Studien zu Plautus' Amphitruo. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Baier, T.1999b. ‘“On ne peut faillir en l'imitant”: Rotrous Sosies, eine Nachgestaltung des plautinischen Amphitruo’, in Baier (1999a) 203–37.
Baier, T. 2004. Studien zu Plautus' Poenulus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bain, D. 1977. Actors and Audience: A Study of Asides and Related Conventions in Greek Drama. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bain, D.1979. ‘Plautus vortit barbare’, in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, 17–34. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, E. and Savarese, N.. 1991. A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. 1970. ‘Plauto e il metateatro antico’, Il Verri 31: 113–30.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. 1982. ‘Actors and Act-Divisions: Some Questions of Adaptation in Roman Comedy’, Antichthon 16: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsby, J. 1986. Plautus: Bacchides. Oak Park, IL, Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar
Barsby, J.1995. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus as Improvisatory Drama', in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 55–70.
Barsby, J. 1999. Terence: Eunuchus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsby, J. 2001. Terence, 2 vols. I: The Woman of Andros, The Self-tormentor, The Eunuch. II: Phormio, The Mother-in-Law, The Brothers. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, I. M. 1972. ‘Tranio's Laconian Key’, Greece and Rome 19: 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beacham, R. C. 1991. The Roman Theatre and its Audience. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beare, W. 1964. The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic, 3rd edn. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. 1997. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd edn. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Benz, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.). 1998. Maccus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität der Captivi des Plautus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Berendt, J. E. 1992. The Jazz Book: From Ragtime to Fusion and Beyond. 6th edn, rev. Gunther Huesmann. New York, Lawrence Hill.Google Scholar
Bergk, T. 1872. ‘Ueber einige Zeichen der Plautinischen Handscriften’, Philologus 31: 229–46.Google Scholar
Bernabò-Brea, L. 1981. Menandro e il teatro greco nelle terracotte liparesi. Geneva, SAGEP.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. 1998. Ludi publici: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1961. The History of the Greek and Roman Theater, 2nd edn. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boldrini, S. 1984. Gli anapesti di Plauto. Urbino, Pubblicazioni dell'Università di Urbino.Google Scholar
Bonaria, M. 1965. Romani Mimi. Rome, In Aedibus Athenaei.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. 1992. From Text to Performance in the Elizabethan Theatre. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, J. R. 1992. Kabuki: Five Classic Plays. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Braun, L. 1970. Die Cantica des Plautus. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 1981. A Commentary on Livy, Books XXXIV–XXXVII. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brook, P. 1968. The Empty Space. New York, Atheneum.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1987. ‘Masks, Names, and Characters in New Comedy’, Hermes 115: 181–201.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1990. ‘Plots and Prostitutes in Greek New Comedy’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 6: 241–66.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1992. ‘Menander, Fragments 745 and 746 K-T, Menander's Kolax and Parasites and Flatterers in Greek Comedy’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 92: 91–107.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M.1993. ‘The Skinny Virgins of Terence, Eunuchus 313–17’, in Jocelyn, H. D. and Hunt, H. (eds.), Tria Lustra, 229–34. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M. 1995. ‘Aeschinus at the Door: Terence Adelphoe 632–43 and the Traditions of Greco-Roman Comedy’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 71–89.Google Scholar
Brown, P. G. M.2002. ‘Actors and Actor-managers at Rome in the Time of Plautus and Terence’, in Easterling and Hall (2002) 225–37.
Buck, C. H. J. 1940. A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. 1975. ‘The Size of the Chorus in Seneca's Agamemnon’, Classical Philology 70: 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, T. F. 1963. P. Terenti Afri Hecyra. Pretoria, The Classical Association of Rhodesia and Nyasaland.Google Scholar
Chalmers, W. R. 1965. ‘Plautus and His Audience’, in Dorley, T. A. and Dudley, D. R. (eds.), Roman Drama, 21–50. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Chiarini, G. 1989. ‘La rappresentazione teatrale’, in Cavallo, P. F. G. and Giardina, A. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. II: 127–214. Rome, Salerno.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. 2000. Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (ed.). 2000. Riffs and Choruses: A New Jazz Anthology. London, Continuum.Google Scholar
Clark, J. R. 2001–02. ‘Early Latin Handwriting and Plautus’ “Pseudolus” ', Classical Journal 97: 183–89.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1977. ‘Public Building in Rome between the Second Punic War and Sulla’, Papers of the British School at Rome 45: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1983. Il foro Romano, vol. I: Periodo arcaico. Rome, Quasar.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1985. Il foro Romano, vol. II: Periodo repubblicano e augusteo. Rome, Quasar.Google Scholar
Cohee, P. 1994. ‘Instauratio sacrorum’, Hermes 122: 451–68.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. R. 1999. Role Doubling as a Dramatic Technique in Greek Tragedy. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Collart, J. 1970. ‘Le soldat qui ne chante pas (quelques remarques sur le rôle du miles chez Plaute)’, in Mélanges M. Durry(Revue des Etudes Latines 47 bis), 199–208. Paris.Google Scholar
Conrad, C. C. 1915. The Technique of Continuous Action in Roman Comedy. Dissertation, Menasha.Google Scholar
Corbett, P. 1986. The Scurra. Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cotticelli, F., Heck, A. G., and Heck, T. F.. 2001. The Commedia dell'Arte in Naples: A Bilingual Edition of the 176 Casamarciano Scenarios, 2 vols. Lanham, MD and London, The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Craig, E. G. 1911. On the Art of the Theatre. London.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 1987. ‘Is the Threat-monologue of the Servus currens an Index of Roman Authorship?’, Phoenix 41: 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. 1989. ‘Plautine Elements in the Running-slave Entrance Monologues?’, Classical Quarterly 39: 148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. 1993. ‘A Case Study in the Use of Theatre Iconography as Evidence for Ancient Acting’, Antike Kunst 36: 41–58.Google Scholar
Csapo, E.2004. ‘The Politics of the New Music’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of ‘Mousike’ in the Classical Athenian City, 207–48. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. and Slater, W. J.. 1995. The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, I. C. 1971. Herodas' Mimiamboi. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damen, M. 1985. The Comedy of Diphilos Sinopeus in Plautus, Terence, and Athenaeus. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Damen, M. 1988. ‘Actors and Act-Divisions in the Greek Original of Plautus’ Menaechmi', Classical World 82: 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. 1989. ‘Actor and Character in Greek Tragedy’, Theatre Journal 41: 316–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. 1992. ‘Translating Scenes: Plautus’ Adaptation of Menander's Dis Exapaton', Phoenix 46: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damen, M. 1995. ‘Actor, Character and Role in Chrysalus’ Trojan Aria (Bacchides 925–978)', Text and Presentation 16: 24–31.Google Scholar
Danese, R. 1999. ‘I meccanismi scenici dell'Asinaria’, in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.), Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates, vol. II: Asinaria, 49–95. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Davis, C. B. 2003. ‘Distant Ventriloquism: Vocal Mimesis, Agency and Identity in Ancient Greek Performance’, Theatre Journal 55: 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorio, A. 2000. Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzi, A. 1952. Cronologia ed evoluzione Plautina. Naples.Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1975. ‘Maschere e personaggi in Plauto’, Dioniso 46: 163–93.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. 2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin, de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, H. 1999. ‘Amusing the Masses: Buildings for Entertainment and Leisure in the Roman World’, in Potter, D. S. and Mattingly, D. J. (eds.), Life, Death, and Entertainment in the Roman Empire, 205–55. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dodwell, C. R. 2000. Anglo-Saxon Gestures and the Roman Stage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duchartre, P. L. 1966. The Italian Comedy, trans. Weaver, R. T.. New York, Dover.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1936. ‘The Dramatic Function of the Seruus currens in Roman Comedy’, Classical Studies Presented to Edward Capps, 93–102. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1940. Epidicus. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton, Princeton University Press. (2nd edn, 1994, with a Foreword and Bibliographical Appendix by R. Hunter. Norman, OK (= Duckworth (1952) and Hunter (1994)).Google Scholar
Dumont, J. -C. 1997. ‘Cantica et espace de représentation dans le théâtre latin’, in Guen, B. (ed.), De la scène aux gradins (PALLAS 47), 41–50. Toulouse, Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.). 2002. Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elm, D. 2001. ‘Plautus’ Persa und Della Portas Trappolaria', in Faller (2001) 287–301.Google Scholar
Enk, P. J. 1932. Mercator. Leiden, A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. 1932–61. Plaute, Comédies, 7 vols. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Faller, S. (ed.). 2001. Studien zu Plautus' Persa. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1965. ‘The Curculio of Plautus: An Illustration of Plautine Methods in Adaptation’, Classical Quarterly 15: 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1968. ‘Terence, Diphilus and Menander: A Reexamination of Terence Adelphoe act II’, Philologus 112: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1975. ‘Sex, Status, and Survival in Hellenistic Athens: A Study of Women in New Comedy’, Phoenix 29: 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1982. ‘Quintilian on Performance: Traditional and Personal Elements in Institutio 11.3’, Phoenix 36: 243–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1989. ‘Mime: The Missing Link in Roman Literary History’, Classical World 82–3: 155–68.Google Scholar
Fantham, E.2002. ‘Orator and/et actor’, in Easterling and Hall (2002) 362–76.
Feather, L. G. 1965. The Book of Jazz, From Then till Now. New York, Horizon.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. H. 1992. Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context. Bloomginton, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. 1995. The Relationship of Oral and Literate Performance Processes in the Commedia Dell'Arte: Beyond the Improvisation/Memorisation Divide. Lewiston, Edwin Mellon.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1960. Elementi Plautini in Plauto, trans. Munari, F.. Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 1932. ‘Two Notes on Plautus’, American Journal of Philology 53: 243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, G. F. 2004. ‘Ensemble Scenes in Plautus’, American Journal of Philology 125: 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frassinetti, P. 1967. Atellanae Fabulae. Rome, in Aedibus Athenaei.Google Scholar
Frost, A. and Yarrow, R.. 1990. Improvisation in Drama. New York, St Martin's.Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. 1972. ‘Zur Eigenart der römischen Komödie. Plautus und Terenz gegenüber ihren griechischen Vorbildern’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. I: 2, 1027–1113. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garton, C. 1972. Personal Aspects of the Roman Theatre. Toronto, Hakkert.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. 1979. Theatrical Performances in the Ancient World: Hellenistic and Early Roman Theatre. Amsterdam, J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1977. ‘The Mask of the Pseudokore’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 18: 247–50.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1978. ‘Where did the Audience Go?’, Scripta Classica Israelica 4: 45–49.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1980. ‘The Concept of the bona meretrix: A Study of Terence's Courtesans’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 108: 142–65.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1981. ‘Who's Afraid of Rope-Walkers and Gladiators? (Ter. Hec. 1–57)’, Athenaeum 59: 29–37.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1985–88. ‘How Rich was Terence?’, Scripta Classica Israelica 8–9: 74–78.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1989. ‘The First Realistic Roles in European Theatre: Terence's Prologues’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 62: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilula, D. 1993. ‘The Crier's Routine (Plaut. Asin. 4–5; Poen. 11–5)’, Athenaeum 81: 283–87.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1996. ‘Choragium and Choragos’, Athenaeum 84: 479–92.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 1978. ‘Plautus’ Epidicus and the Case of the Missing Original', Transactions of the American Philological Association 108: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M.1995. ‘Improvisation, Plot, and Plautus’ Curculio', in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 33–41.
Goldberg, S. M. 1998. ‘Plautus in the Palatine’, Journal of Roman Studies 88: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M.2004. ‘Plautus and his Alternatives: Textual Doublets in Cistellaria’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004) 385–98.
Goold, G. P. 1959. ‘First Thoughts on the Dyscolus’, Phoenix 13: 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. 1983. Lazzi: The Comedy Routines of the Commedia dell'Arte. New York, Performing Arts Journal Publications.Google Scholar
Götte, K. 2001. ‘Plautus’ Persa als Inspiration für John Lylys Mother Bombie', in Faller (2001) 273–86.
Gow, A. S. F. 1912. ‘On the Use of Masks in Roman Comedy’, Journal of Roman Studies 2: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, F. 1991. ‘Gestures and Conventions: The Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators’, in Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.), A Cultural History of Gesture from Antiquity to the Present Day, 36–58. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1973. ‘TITVS MACCIVS PLAUTVS’, Classical Quarterly 23: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S.1982. ‘Drama’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. II: Latin Literature, 77–137. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1993. Plautus: Menaechmi. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1999. Terence: The Brothers, 2nd edn. Warminster, Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Green, J. R. 1997. ‘Deportment, Costume and Naturalism in Comedy’, Pallas 47: 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. R.2006. ‘The Persistent Phallos: Regional Variability in the Performance Style of Comedy’, in Davidson, F. M. J. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Greek Drama III: Papers for Kevin Lee, 141–62. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S.. 1903. ‘413. Farce and Mime’, Oxyrhynchus Papyri 3: 41–57.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gurlitt, L. 1921. Erotica Plautina: Eine Auswahl erotischer Szenen aus Plautus. Munich, Georg Müller.Google Scholar
Gzowski, P. 1997. The Morningside Years CD (bound with The Morningside Years). Toronto, McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Halford, A. S. and Halford, G. M.. 1956. The Kabuki Handbook. Tokyo, C. E. Tuttle.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. 1965. The Dyskolos of Menander. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. 1968. Menander and Plautus: A Study in Comparison. London, H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Handley, E. W. 1975. ‘Plautus and his Public: Some Thoughts on New Comedy in Latin’, Dioniso 46: 117–32.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. 1959. Roman Theater-Temples. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harsh, P. W. 1937. ‘Angiportum, Platea, and Vicus’, Classical Philology 32: 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.). 2004. Studien zu Plautus' Cistellaria. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Havet, L. 1905. ‘Etudes sur Plaute. Asinaria I: La Seconde et la troiscème scènes et la composition générale’, Revue de Philologie 29: 94–103.Google Scholar
Henke, R. 2002. Performance and Literature in the Commedia dell'Arte. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. 1976. ‘Remarques sur les praecones et le praeconium dans la Rome de la fin de la République’, Latomus 35: 730–46.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D., Kett, J. F. and Trefil, J. S.. 1987. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hoffer, C. 1877. De personarum usu in P. Terenti comoediis. Halle.Google Scholar
Hough, J. N. 1970. ‘Rapid Repartee in Roman Comedy’, Classical Journal 65: 162–67.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. 1962. Cicero. Brutus, Orator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 1991. ‘Acting Style in the Ancient World’, Theatre Notebook 41: 2–16.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1979. ‘The Comic Chorus in the Fourth Century’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 36: 23–38.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1985. The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L.1994. ‘Foreword and Bibliographical Appendix’, in Duckworth, G. E., The Nature of Roman Comedy, 2nd edn, iii and 465–71. Norman, Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Huys, M. 1993. ‘P. Oxy. LIII 3705: A Line from Menander's Periceiromene with Musical Notation’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 99: 30–32.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. 1962. Tacitus: The Histories. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1967. The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1984. ‘Anti-Greek Elements in Plautus’ Menaechmi?', Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4: 1–25.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1987. ‘Studies in the Indirect Tradition of Plautus’ Pseudolus (II)', Filologia e forme letterarie: Studi offerti a Francesco della Corte, vol. II: 57–72. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1993. Review of Zwierlein (1990), Gnomon 65: 122–37.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1996. Review of Zwierlein (1991a), Gnomon 68: 402–20.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D.2000. ‘The Unpretty Boy of Plautus’ Pseudolus (767–789)', in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.), Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre, 431–60. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1992. ‘Reflections of Inner Life: Masks and Masked Acting in Ancient Greek Tragedy and Japanese Noh Drama’, Modern Drama 35: 20–34.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. A. 1980. ‘Poenulus I, 2 and Roman Women’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 110: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, K. 1981. Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, corrected edn. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnstone, K. 1999. Impro for Storytellers. London, Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1989. Chuck Amuck: The Life and Times of an Animated Cartoonist. New York, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Jones, L. W. and Morey, C. R.. 1930–31. The Miniatures of the Manuscripts of Terence Prior to the Thirteenth Century, 2 vols. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jory, E. J. 1967. ‘PAIS KOMOIDOS and the DIA PANTON’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 14: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jory, E. J. 1986. ‘Gladiators in the Theatre’, Classical Quarterly 36: 537–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jory, E. J.1988. ‘Publilius Syrus and the Element of Competition in the Theatre of the Republic’, in Horsfall, N. (ed.), Vir Bonus Discendi Peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch's Eightieth Birthday, 73–81. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Kamel, W. 1951. ‘The Fabula Atellana and its Stock Characters’, Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, Cairo 13: 89–97.Google Scholar
Kauer, R. and Lindsay, W. M.. 1926. P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Reprinted, 1958, with additions by O. Skutsch.)Google Scholar
Kehoe, P. H. 1984. ‘The Adultery Mime Reconsidered’, in Bright, D. F. and Ramage, E. S. (eds.), Classical Texts and their Tradition: Studies in Honor of C. R. Trahnam, 89–106. Chico, CA, Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Keil, H. 1961. Grammatici Latini. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Ketterer, R. C. 1986a. ‘Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy I’, Semiotica 58: 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterer, R. C. 1986b. ‘Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy II’, Semiotica 59: 93–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterer, R. C. 1986c. ‘Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy III’, Semiotica 60: 29–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, T. J. 1992. Casting Shakespeare's Plays: London Actors and their Roles. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. 1970. ‘The Punic Speech of Hanno’, Orientalia 39: 52–74.Google Scholar
Kurrelmeyer, C. M. 1932. The Economy of Actors in Plautus. Graz, Deutsche Vereins-Druckerei.Google Scholar
Lange, D. 1973. ‘The Number of Slave Roles in Plautus’ Aulularia', Classical Philology 68: 62–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, H. H. 1922. Studies in the Songs of Plautine Comedy. Dissertation, Menasha.Google Scholar
Lecoq, J. 2001. The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1982. Maccus vortit barbare: Vom tragischen Amphitryon zum tragikomischen Amphitruo. Wiesbaden, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1995. Plautus und Philemon. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1997. Plautus' Pseudolus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E.1999. ‘Plautus’ Amphitruo zwischen Tragödie und Stegreifspiel', in Baier (1999) 11–50.
Lefèvre, E. 2001. Plautus' Aulularia. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1991. Plautus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität des Plautus. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1981. The Lives of the Greek Poets. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2004. Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejay, P. A. A. 1925. Plaute. Paris, Boivin.Google Scholar
Leneaghan, J. O. 1969. A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De Haruspicum Responso. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1895–96. Plauti Comoediae, 2 vols. Berlin, Weidmann.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1897. Die plautinischen Cantica und die hellenistische Lyrik. Berlin, Weidmann.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1912. Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1900. The Captivi of Plautus. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1904. The Ancient Editions of Plautus. Oxford, J. Parker.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1904–05. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae, 2 vols. Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Revised, 1910, with addenda and corrigenda.)Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1922. Early Latin Verse. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
List, G. 1963. ‘The Boundaries of Speech and Song’, Ethnomusicology 7.1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llarena i Xibillè, M. 1994. Personae Plautinae. Barcelona, Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1989. ‘The virgo callida of Plautus, Persa’, Classical Quarterly 39: 390–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1990. ‘Plautus’ Choruses', Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 133: 274–97.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1992. ‘Aspects of Plautus’ Originality in the Asinaria', Classical Quarterly 42: 152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B.1995. ‘Plautus’ “Indoor Scenes” and Improvised Drama', in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 23–31.
Lowe, J. C. B. 1997. ‘Terence's Four-Speaker Scenes’, Phoenix 51: 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, N. J. 2000. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1959. ‘Von Terenz zu Menander’, Philologus 103: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1969. ‘Menander's Slaves: Their Names, Roles and Masks’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 100: 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1970. ‘Menander's Characters: Their Names, Roles and Masks’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 101: 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1971. ‘Menander's Old Men’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCary, W. T. 1972. ‘Menander's Soldiers: Their Names, Roles and Masks’, American Journal of Philology 93: 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1971. Aristophanes: Wasps. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1994. ‘The Number of Speaking Actors in Old Comedy’, Classical Quarterly 44: 325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maidment, K. J. 1935. ‘The Later Comic Chorus’, Classical Quarterly 29: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1993. ‘Status Transactions in Aristophanes’ Frogs', Text and Presentation 14: 57–61.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1994. ‘The Rules of Three Actors in Practice’, Text and Presentation 15: 53–61.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1996. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus: The Long and the Short of it', Text and Presentation 17: 34–38.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1997a. ‘Comic Technique and the Fourth Actor’, Classical Quarterly 47: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1997b. ‘Shattered Mirrors and Breaking Class: Saturio's Daughter in Plautus’ Persa', Text and Presentation 18: 100–09.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W.1998. ‘In Seneca's Wings’, in Bews, J. P., Storey, I. C. and Boyne, M. R. (eds.), Celebratio: Thirtieth Anniversary Essays at Trent University, 86–95. Peterborough, Ontario, Trent University.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1999a. ‘Quis Hic Loquitur? Plautine Delivery and the “Double Aside”’, Syllecta Classica 10: 105–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 1999b. ‘Some Fifth-Century Masking Conventions’, Greece and Rome 46: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2000a. ‘Female Performers on Stage? (PhV 96 [RVP 2/33])’, Text and Presentation 21: 13–25.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W.2000b. ‘Location! Location! Location!: Choral Absence and Dramatic Space in Seneca's Troades’, in G. W. M. Harrison (ed.), Seneca in Performance, 27–51. Swansta.
Marshall, C. W. 2002. ‘Chorus, Metatheatre, and Dyskolos 427–441’, Scholia 11: 3–17.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2003. ‘Casting the Oresteia’, Classical Journal 98: 257–74.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2004. ‘Alcestis and the Ancient Rehearsal Process (P. Oxy. 4546)’, Arion 11.3: 28–45.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1957. ‘The Plautine didascaliae’, Athenaeum 35: 78–88.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1960. ‘The First Period of Plautine Revival’, Latomus 19: 230–52.Google Scholar
Maurach, G. 1988. Der Poenulus des Plautus. Heidelberg, Carl Winter.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1979. ‘Augustan Elegy and Mime’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Association 25: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeish, K. 1976. Roman Comedy. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
McMillin, S. and MacLean, S.. 1998. The Queen's Men and Their Plays. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyerhold, V. E. 1969. Meyerhold on Theatre, trans. Braun, E.. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. 1984. ‘The Political Character of the Classical Roman Republic’, Journal of Roman Studies 74: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, K. L. 2002. ‘Playing House: Stage, Space, and Domesticity in Plautus’ Mostellaria', Helios 29: 3–25.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1991. ‘Palliata togata: Plautus, Curculio 462–86’, American Journal of Philology 112: 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1994. ‘Seats and Social Status in the Plautine Theatre’, Classical Journal 90: 113–23.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1998a. ‘Music and Structure in Roman Comedy’, American Journal of Philology 119: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1998b. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1999. ‘Facing the Music: Character and Musical Accompaniment in Roman Comedy’, Syllecta Classica 10: 130–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. J.2001a. ‘Music in Epidicus’, in Auhagen (2001) 313–34.
Moore, T. J.2001b. ‘Music in Persa’, in Faller (2001) 255–72.
Moore, T. J.2004a. ‘Music in a Quiet Play’, in Baier (2004) 139–61.
Moore, T. J.2004b. ‘Meter and Meaning in Cistellaria II’, in Hartkamp and Hurka (2004) 319–33.
Moore, T. J.forthcoming. Music in Roman Comedy.
Moorehead, . 1953–54. ‘The Distribution of Roles in Plautus’ Menaechmi', Classical Journal 49: 123–27.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. 1986. ‘Plautus and the Theatre of Disguise’, Classical Antiquity 5: 216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumann, M. 1976. ‘Literary Production and Reception’, New Literary History 8.1: 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, H. -G. 1985. Lukians Parasitendialog. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nettl, B. 1974. ‘Thoughts on Improvisation’, Musical Quarterly 60: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, A. 1931. Masks, Mimes, and Miracles: Studies in the Popular Theatre. London, George G. Harrap.Google Scholar
Nicolson, F. W. 1893. ‘The Use of Hercle (Mehercle), Edepol (Pol), Ecastor (Mecastor) by Plautus and Terence’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 4: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, P. 1917. Plautus II: Casina, the Casket Comedy, Curculio, Epidicus, The Two Menaechmuses. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, P. 1924. Plautus III: The Merchant, The Braggart Warrior, The Haunted House, The Persian. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X, vol. II (Books VII and VIII). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2001. ‘4546. Euripides, Alcestis 344–82 with Omissions’, Oxyrhynchus Papyri 67: 19–22.Google Scholar
Olson, K. 2003. ‘Roman Underwear Revisited’, Classical World 96: 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, S. 2002. The Authentic Shakespeare, and Other Problems of the Early Modern Stage. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. E. A. 1997. Rome and Carthage at Peace. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Pansièri, C. 1997. Plaute et Rome, ou, Les ambiguïtés d'un marginal. Brussels, Collection Latomus.Google Scholar
Paratore, E. 1959. ‘Il flautista nel DUSKOLOS e nello Pseudolus’, Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medievale 1: 310–25.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1989. ‘Crucially Funny, or Tranio on the Couch’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 119: 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelli, L. 1983. ‘L'Alcmena plautina, personaggio serio o parodico?’, Civiltà Classica e Cristiana 4: 383–94.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. E. 1985. ‘Alcumena in the Amphitruo of Plautus: A Pregnant Lady Joke’, Classical Journal 80: 121–26.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pietropaolo, D. (ed.). 1989. The Science of Buffonery: Theory and History of the Commedia Dell'Arte. Ottawa, Dovehouse.Google Scholar
Poe, J. P. 1996. ‘The Supposed Conventional Meanings of Dramatic Masks: A Re-examination of Pollux 4.133–54’, Philologus 140: 306–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. and West, M. L.. 2001. Documents of Ancient Greek Music: The Extant Melodies and Fragments. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R. 2004. ‘Aristophanes, Acharnians 1118–21’, Greece and Rome 51: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, D. S. 1999. Literary Texts and the Roman Historian. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Préaux, J. G. 1962. ‘Manducus’, in Renard, M. (ed.), Hommages à A. Grenier (Collection Latomus 58), 1282–91. Berchem-Brussels, Latomus.Google Scholar
Prehn, B. 1916. Quaestiones Plautinae. Breslau, Nischkowsky.Google Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1910. ‘Three Puer-Scenes in Plautus, and the Distribution of Rôles’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 21: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1923. ‘The Doubling of Rôles in Roman Comedy’, Classical Philology 18: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1932. ‘Criteria of Originality in Plautus’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 63: 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1934. Review of Kurrelmeyer (1932), Classical Philology 29: 350–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, H. W. 1937. ‘Silent Roles in Roman Comedy’, Classical Philology 32: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primmer, A. 1984. Handlungsgliederung in Nea und Palliata: Dis Exapaton und Bacchides. Vienna, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1983. ‘The apparitores: A Study in Social Mobility’, Papers of the British School at Rome 51: 125–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Questa, C. 1967. Introduzione alla metrica di Plauto. Bologna, R. Pàtron.Google Scholar
Questa, C. 1970. ‘Alcune strutture sceniche di Plauto e Menandro’, Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique XVI: Ménandre, 181–215. Geneva, Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Questa, C. 1995. Cantica: Titi Macci Plauti. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Questa, C. 2001. Casina. Urbino, Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Radice, B. 1976. Terence: the Comedies. New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
Rambo, E. F. 1915. ‘The Significance of the Wing-Entrances in Roman Comedy’, Classical Philology 10: 411–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, D. S. 1965. Latin Metre: An Introduction. London, Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1993. ‘Freedmen in Roman Comedy’, in Scodel, R. (ed.), Theater and Society in the Classical World, 215–33. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. 1992. Greek Tragic Theatre. New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, H. 1903. Der Mimus: ein Litterar-Entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Versuch. Berlin. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Reinach, T. 1919. ‘Tibia’, in Daremberg, C. and Saglio, E. (eds.), Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines V: 300–32. Paris, Hachette.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. W. 1946. ‘The Adultery Mime’, Classical Quarterly 40: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, K. and Richards, L.. 1990. The Commedia dell'Arte: A Documentary History. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. 1992. A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ringler, W. A. 1968. ‘The Number of Actors in Shakespeare's Early Plays’, in Bentley, G. E. (ed.), The Seventeenth-Century Stage: A Collection of Critical Essays, 110–34. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 1983. ‘The aduocati in the Poenulus and the piscatores in the Rudens’, Maia 35: 83–93.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 2000. ‘The Audiences of New Comedy’, Greece and Rome 47: 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D. 1975. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura, rev. M. F. Smith. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1968. ‘The Origin and Development of Republican Forums’, Phoenix 22: 304–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. A. 2001. Quintilian: The Orator's Education, vol. V (Books 11–12). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. and Cunningham, I. C.. 2002. Theophrastus: Characters; Herodas: Mimes; Sophron and Other Mime Fragments. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sage, E. T. 1935. Livy IX: Books XXXI–XXXIV. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salerno, H. F. (ed.). 1967. Scenarios of the Commedia dell'Arte: Flaminio Scala's ‘Il teatro delle favole rappresentative’. New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. 1982. ‘How Terence's Hecyra Failed’, Classical Quarterly 32: 134–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C. 1909. Costume in Roman Comedy. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. 1913. ‘The Site of Dramatic Performances at Rome in the Times of Plautus and Terence’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 44: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaaf, L. 1977. Der Miles gloriosus des Plautus und sein griechisches Original. Ein Beitrag zur Kontaminationsfrage. Munich, W. Fink.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. and Hosius, C.. 1927, repr. 1966. Geschichte der römischen Literatur, 3 vols. Munich, C. H. Beck'sche.Google Scholar
Schechner, R. 1969. Public Domain: Essays on the Theatre. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. 1931. ‘Meretrix’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 15.1: 1018–27.Google Scholar
Schönbeck, H. -P. 1981. Beiträge zur Interpretation der plautinischen ‘Bacchides’. Düsseldorf, Peter Mannhold.Google Scholar
Schumacher, C. 2000. ‘Would you Splash Out on a Ticket to Molière's Palais Royal?’, Theatre Research International 25: 248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutter, H. E. 1952. Quibus annis comoediae Plautinae primae actae sint quaeritur. Groningen, De Waal.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, W. B. 1925. ‘The Cantica of Plautus’, Classical Review 39: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, W. B. 1949. ‘Plautine Chronology’, American Journal of Philology 70: 376–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, E. 1975. ‘Perché Amphitruo’, Dioniso 46: 247–67.Google Scholar
Segal, E. 1987. Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus, 2nd edn. New York, Oxford University Press. (1st edn, 1968.)Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 2000. Valerius Maximus: Memorable Doings and Sayings. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sheets, G. A. 1983. ‘Plautus and Early Roman Tragedy’, Illinois Classical Studies 8: 195–209.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M. 1967. Studies in the History of Hellenistic Drama. London, Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M.1979. ‘Boy Actors in New Comedy’, in Bowerstock, G. W., Burkert, W. and Putnam, M. J. C. (eds.), Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to B. M. W. Knox, 199–208. Berlin, de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, A. 1983. ‘The Theatre and its Andvences’, in Sinfield, A. (ed.), Society and Literature 1945–1970, 173–97. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Skutsch, F. 1900. ‘Ein Prolog des Diphilos und eine Komödie des Plautus’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 55: 272–85.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W.1996. ‘Literacy and Old Comedy’, in I. Worthington (ed.), Voice into Text, 99–112. Leiden, Brill.
Slater, N. W. 2000. Plautus in Performance: the theatre of the Mind, 2nd edition. Amsterdam, Harwood Academic. (1st edn, Princeton University Press, 1985.)Google Scholar
Slater, N. W.2004. ‘Staging Literacy in Plautus’, in Mackie, C. J. (ed.), Oral Performance and its Context, 163–77. Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Smith, I. 1967. ‘Their Exits and Reentrances’, Shakespeare Quarterly 18: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. L. 1991. Plautus, Three Comedies: Miles Gloriosus, Pseudolus, Rudens. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, F. M. 1970. Blacks in Antiquity: Ethiopians in the Greco-Roman Experience. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spolin, V. 1983. Improvisation for the Theater: A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stambaugh, J. E. 1988. The Ancient Roman City. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stärk, E. 1989. Die Menaechmi des Plautus und kein griechisches Original. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Stern, T. 2004. Making Shakespeare: From Stage to Page. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tanner, R. G. 1969. ‘Problems in Plautus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 15: 95–105.Google Scholar
Tansey, P. 2001. ‘New Light on the Roman Stage: A Revival of Terence's Phormio Rediscovered’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 144: 22–43.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. 1993. Comic Angels and Other Approaches to Greek Drama through Vase-Paintings. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1935. ‘The Sellisternium and the Theatrical Pompa’, Classical Philology 30: 122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1937. ‘The Opportunities for Dramatic Performances in the Time of Plautus and Terence’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 68: 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1966. Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tobias, A. J. 1980. ‘Bacchiac Women and Iambic Slaves in Plautus’, Classical World 73: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trendall, A. D. 1967. Phlyax Vases, 2nd edn. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 1995. ‘Traditionen improvisierten Theaters bei Plautus’, in Zimmermann, B. (ed.), Griechisch-römische Komödie und Tragödie, 70–93. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G.2001. ‘Traditions of Theatrical Improvisation in Plautus: Some Considerations’, in Segal, E. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Menander, Plautus, and Terence, 95–106. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. 1970. Studies in Later Greek Comedy, 2nd edn. New York, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. 1995. Monuments Illustrating New Comedy, 3rd edn, revised and enlarged by J. R. Green and A. Seeberg, 2 vols. London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Weinberger, W. 1892. ‘Beiträge zu den Bühenalterthümern aus Donats Terenzcommentar’, Wiener Studien 14: 120–30.Google Scholar
Weissinger, R. T. 1940. A Study of Act Divisions in Classical Drama. Scottdale, Mennonite Publishing House.Google Scholar
Welch, K. 1994. ‘The Roman Arena in Late-Republican Italy: A New Interpretation’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 7: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, K. 2003. ‘A New View of the Origins of the Roman Basilica: The Atrium Region, Graecostasis, and Roman Diplomacy’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessner, P. 1902–08. Aeli Donati Commentvm Terenti, 3 vols. Leipzig, Teubner.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1992. Ancient Greek Music. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiemken, H. 1972. Der griechische Mimus: Dokumente zur Geschichte des antiken Volkstheaters. Bremen, Carl Schünemann.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1989. ‘Marriage and Prostitution in Classical New Comedy’, in Redmond, J. (ed.), Themes in Drama. II: Women in Theatre, 31–48. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1991. The Masks of Menander: Sign and Meaning in Greek and Roman Performance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1997. Greek Theatre Performance: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. (ed.). 1987. Plautus: Pseudolus. Bristol, Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. 1995. ‘Plautus and the Epidicus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 19–29.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. M. 1938. The Clothing of the Ancient Romans. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, G. T. 1988. Shakespeare's Metrical Art. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the comoedia palliata. Rome, American Academy.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1993. Plautus' Curculio. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Wüst, E. 1932. ‘Mimus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 15.2: 1727–64.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. 1995. ‘The Impromptu Element in Plautus in the Light of the Evidence of New Comedy’, in Benz, Stärk, and Vogt-Spira (1995) 71–86.
Zwierlein, O. 1990. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus I: Poenulus und Curculio. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1991a. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus II: Miles gloriosus. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1991b. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus III: Pseudolus. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1992. Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus IV: Bacchides. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • C. W. Marshall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Book: The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486203.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • C. W. Marshall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Book: The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486203.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • C. W. Marshall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Book: The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486203.010
Available formats
×