Aissen, Judith L. 1983. “Indirect Object Advancement in Tzotzil.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 272–302Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith L. 1999. “Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aissen, Judith L. 2003. “Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alsina, Alex. 1992. “On the Argument Structure of Causatives.”Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517–555Google Scholar

Alsina, Alex, and Joshi, Smita. 1991. “Parameters in Causative Constructions.”CLS 27: 1–15Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1988. “Ergativity in Päri, a Nilotic OVS Language.”Lingua 75: 289–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery. 1985. “The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase.” In Shopen, Timothy ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I, Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154Google Scholar

Arka, I Wayan. 1998. “From Morphosyntax to Pragmatics in Balinese: A Lexical-Functional Approach”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney

Arka, I Wayan, and Christopher D. Manning. 1998. “Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian: A New Perspective.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/3/lfg98.html

Arka, I Wayan, and Jane Simpson. 1998. “Control and Complex Arguments in Balinese.” in Butt, Miriam and Holloway King, Tracy, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications

Austin, Peter. 1981. “Switch-Reference in Australia.”Language 57: 309–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baker, Mark C. 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure.” In Haegeman, Liliane, ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 73–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Sarah J. 1983. “Advancements and Ascensions in Cebuano.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143–218Google Scholar

Besnier, Nikko. 1988. “Semantic and Pragmatic Constraints on Tuvaluan Raising.”Linguistics 26: 747–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. and Ningomba, M. S.. 1997. Manipuri Grammar. München: Lincom EuropaGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, and Yādava, Yogrenda P.. 2000. “A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Indo-Aryan.”Lingua 110: 343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, Scope, and Binding. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittner, Maria, and Hale, Ken. 1996a. “Ergativity: Towards a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 531–604Google Scholar

Bittner, Maria, and Hale, Ken. 1996b. “The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68Google Scholar

Bouchard, Denis. 1984. On the Content of Empty Categories. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Bouma, Gosse, Malouf, Robert, and Sag, Ivan A.. 2001. “Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 1–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan 1982. “Control and Complementation.” In Bresnan, Joan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 282–390Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan 1995. “Linear Order, Syntactic Rank, and Empty Categories: On Weak Crossover.” In Dalrymple, Mary, Kaplan, Ronald M., Maxwell, John T. III, and Zaenen, Annie, eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 241–274Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, and Mchombo, Sam. 1987. “Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chicheŵa.”Language 63: 741–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, and Annie Zaenen 1990. “Deep Unaccusativity in LFG.” In Dziwirek, Katarzyna, Patrick, Farrell, and Mejías-Bikandi, Errapel, eds., Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 45–57Google Scholar

Broadwell, George Aaron. In press. A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel

Butt, Miriam. 1993. “Object Specificity and Agreement in Hindi/Urdu.”CLS 29: 89–103Google Scholar

Chapin, Paul G. 1970. “Samoan Pronominalization.”Language 46: 366–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. “On Binding.”Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan, eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 89–155Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik 1993. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters.” In Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo, eds., Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 506–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Chung, Sandra, and Seiter, William J.. 1980. “The History of Raising and Relativization in Polynesian.”Language 56: 622–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, George N., McCloskey, James, Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1983. “String-Vacuous Rule Application.”Linguistic Inquiry 14: 1–17Google Scholar

Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North HollandGoogle Scholar

Cole, Peter 1983. “Switch-Reference in Two Quechua Languages.” In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Peter. 1987. “Null Objects in Universal Grammar.”Linguistic Inquiry 18: 597–612Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1978. “Ergativity.” In Lehmann, Winfred P., ed., Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press. 329–394Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1979. “Degrees of Ergativity: Some Chukchee Evidence.” In Plank, Frans, ed., Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press. 219–240Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1983. “Switch-Reference in Huichol: A Typological Study.” In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Cooreman, Ann. 1988. “Ergativity in Dyirbal Discourse.”Linguistics 26: 717–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooreman, Ann M., Barbara Fox, and Talmy Givón 1988. “The Discourse Definition of Ergativity: A Study of Chamorro and Tagalog Texts.” In McGinn, Richard, ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies. 387–425Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary. 1993. The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Stanford, Calif: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics, vol. xxxiv). New York: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, and Kaplan, Ronald M.. 2000. “Feature Indeterminacy and Feature Resolution.”Language 76: 759–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, Ron Kaplan, and Tracy Holloway King. 2001. “Weak Crossover and the Absence of Traces.” In Butt, Miriam and Holloway King, Tracy, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, University of Hong Kong. Online: CSLI Publications. 66–82. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01.htmlGoogle Scholar

Davies, William D. 1984. “Antipassive: Choctaw Evidence for a Universal Characterization.” In Perlmutter, David M. and Rosen, Carol G., eds., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 331–376Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. “Decomposing Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A Grammar of Yidi. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. “Corrections and Comments Concerning Heath's ‘Is Dyirbal Ergative?’.”Linguistics 17: 1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection.”Language 67: 547–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. “Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative.”Language 62: 808–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1987. “Grammatical Relations in Acehnese.”Studies in Language 11: 365–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1988. “The So-Called Passive of Acehnese.”Language 64: 104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 1983. “Subjects and Long-Distance Dependencies.”Linguistic Analysis 12: 245–270Google Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 1992. “Suppress α.”Linguistics 30: 999–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 1994. “A New Look at Agreement.” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, June 21–22, 1993

Falk, Yehuda N. 1996. “Case Typology and Case Theory.” Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Falk, Yehuda N. 1999. “Philippine Subjects in a Monostratal Framework.” Sixth annual conference of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, April 16–18, 1999, University of Toronto

Falk, Yehuda N. 2000. “Pivots and the Theory of Grammatical Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 00 Conference, University of California, Berkeley. Online: CSLI Publications. 122–138. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/5/lfg00.html

Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 2002. “Resumptive Pronouns in LFG.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, Athens. Online: CSLI Publications. 154–173. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/7/lfg02.html

Falk, Yehuda N. 2005. “Open Argument Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 05 Conference, University of Bergen. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/10/lfg05.html

Farrell, Patrick, Marlett, Stephen A., and Perlmutter, David M.. 1991. “Notions of Subjecthood and Switch Reference: Evidence from Seri.”Linguistic Inquiry 22: 431–456Google Scholar

Finer, Daniel L. 1985. “The Syntax of Switch-Reference.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 35–55

Foley, William A., and Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. “Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure.”Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–184Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Sag, Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. II. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Lynn 1983. “Switch Reference, Clause Order, and Interclausal Relationships in Maricopa.” In John Haiman and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 83–104Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, Eithne, Hung, Henrietta, and Travis, Lisa. 1992. “SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John, and Munro, Pamela 1983. “Introduction.” In Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ⅸ–ⅹⅴCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Ken. 1983. “Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Ken 1992. “Subject Obviation, Switch Reference, and Control.” In Larson, Richard K., Iatridou, Sabine, Lahiri, Utpal, and Higginbotham, James, eds., Control and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 51–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1999. “Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies Across Grammars.”Language 72: 244–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1979. “Is Dyirbal Ergative?.”Linguistics 17: 401–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. “Movement and Control.”Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. “On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James 1989. “Pro-Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory.” In Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Ken, eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. “The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory.”Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Ken Safir 1989. “The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory.” In Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Ken, eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, David E., and Postal, Paul M.. 1980. Arc Pair Grammar. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M., and Joan Bresnan 1982. “Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation.” In Bresnan, Joan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 173–281Google Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M., and John T. Maxwell, III 1995. “Constituent Coordination in Lexical-Functional Grammar.” In Mary Dalrymple, Ronald M. Kaplan, John T. Maxwell III, and Annie Zaenen, eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. First published in 1988, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING88), Budapest, vol. I. 199–210

Kaplan, Ronald M., and JohnMaxwell, T., III. 1996. Grammar Writer's Workbench (Technical Report). Palo Alto, Calif.: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/lfg/lfgmanual.psGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M., and Annie Zaenen 1989. “Long-Distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty.” In Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch, eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 17–42

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of “Subject.” In Li, Charles, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 303–333Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L., and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.”Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99Google Scholar

Kibrik, A. E. 1987. “Constructions with Clause Actants in Daghestanian Languages.”Lingua 71: 133–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Tracy Holloway. 1995. Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Langdon, Margaret, and Munro, Pamela. 1979. “Subject and (Switch-)Reference in Yuman.”Folia Linguistica 13: 321–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen, Thomas W. 1987. “The Syntactic Status of Ergativity in Quiché.”Lingua 71: 33–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne. 2001. “The Configurational Structure of a Nonconfigurational Language.”Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 61–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, Beth, and Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In Li, Charles N., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Lødrup, Helge 2000. “Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The Case of Norwegian Existentials and Resultatives.” In Butt, Miriam and Holloway King, Tracy, eds., Argument Realization. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 171–188Google Scholar

Lynch, John 1983. “Switch-Reference in Lenakel.” In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, Jim 1997. “Subjecthood and Subject Positions.” in Haegeman, Liliane, ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallinson, Graham, and Blake, Barry J.. 1981. Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Marantz, Alec 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Explanation in Linguistics.” In Zaenen, Annie, ed., Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 1–24Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Clause Structure in Malayalam.” In Bresnan, Joan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 504–589Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1983. “Functional and Anaphoric Control.”Linguistic Inquiry 14: 641–674Google Scholar

Moore, John, and Perlmutter, David M.. 2000. “What Does it Take to be a Dative Subject?”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike, and Hovdhaugen, Even. 1992. Samoan Reference Grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University PressGoogle Scholar

Munro, Pamela, and Gordon, Lynn. 1982. “Syntactic Relations in Western Muskogean: A Typological Perspective.”Language 58: 81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murasugi, Kumiko G. 1992. “Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

Nordlinger, Rachel. 1998. Constructive Case: Evidence from Australian Languages. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” BLS 4

Perlmutter, David M., ed., 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. 1984. “The Inadequacy of Some Monostratal Theories of Passive.” In Perlmutter, David M. and Rosen, Carol G., eds., Studies in Relational Gramma, vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal 1983. “Towards a Universal Characterization of Passivization.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Plank, Frans, ed., 1979. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1997. “The Morpholexical Nature of English to Contraction.”Language 73: 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin (2003) “Deconstructing Thematic Hierarchies.” Ms., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Stanford University

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.”Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Sadler, Louisa. 1999. “Non-Distributive Features in Welsh Coordination.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 99 Conference, The University of Manchester. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/4/lfg99.html

Sag, Ivan A., and Pollard, Carl. 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.”Language 67: 63–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saiki, Mariko. 1985. “On the Coordination of Gapped Constituents in Japanese.”CLS 21: 371–387Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic, or None of the Above.” In Li, Charles, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 493–518Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul 1987. “Tagalog.” In Comrie, Bernard, ed., The World's Major Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 936–958Google Scholar

Seiter, William J. 1983. “Subject–Direct Object Raising in Niuean.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 317–359Google Scholar

Sells, Peter. 1984. “Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Shlonsky, Ur. 1988. “Complementizer-Cliticization in Hebrew and the Empty Category Principle.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, Jane. 1983. “Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

Simpson, Jane. 1991. Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, Jane, and Bresnan, Joan. 1983. “Control and Obviation in Warlpiri.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobin, Nicholas. 1987. “The Variable Status of complementizer-Trace Phenomena.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vainikka, Anne, and Levy, Yonata. 1999. “Empty Subjects in Finnish and Hebrew.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valin, Robert D. Jr., and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wechsler, Stephen, and Arka, I Wayan. 1998. “Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: An Argument Structure Based Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1984. “Grammatical Relations.”Linguistic Inquiry 15: 639–673Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 1997. “Four-Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 181–227

Ziv, Yael 1976. “On the Reanalysis of Grammatical Terms in Hebrew Possessive Constructions.” In Cole, Peter, ed., Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The Transformational-Generative Approach. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Aissen, Judith L. 1983. “Indirect Object Advancement in Tzotzil.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 272–302Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith L. 1999. “Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aissen, Judith L. 2003. “Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alsina, Alex. 1992. “On the Argument Structure of Causatives.”Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517–555Google Scholar

Alsina, Alex, and Joshi, Smita. 1991. “Parameters in Causative Constructions.”CLS 27: 1–15Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1988. “Ergativity in Päri, a Nilotic OVS Language.”Lingua 75: 289–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery. 1985. “The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase.” In Shopen, Timothy ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I, Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154Google Scholar

Arka, I Wayan. 1998. “From Morphosyntax to Pragmatics in Balinese: A Lexical-Functional Approach”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney

Arka, I Wayan, and Christopher D. Manning. 1998. “Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian: A New Perspective.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/3/lfg98.html

Arka, I Wayan, and Jane Simpson. 1998. “Control and Complex Arguments in Balinese.” in Butt, Miriam and Holloway King, Tracy, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications

Austin, Peter. 1981. “Switch-Reference in Australia.”Language 57: 309–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baker, Mark C. 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure.” In Haegeman, Liliane, ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 73–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Sarah J. 1983. “Advancements and Ascensions in Cebuano.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143–218Google Scholar

Besnier, Nikko. 1988. “Semantic and Pragmatic Constraints on Tuvaluan Raising.”Linguistics 26: 747–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. and Ningomba, M. S.. 1997. Manipuri Grammar. München: Lincom EuropaGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, and Yādava, Yogrenda P.. 2000. “A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Indo-Aryan.”Lingua 110: 343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, Scope, and Binding. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittner, Maria, and Hale, Ken. 1996a. “Ergativity: Towards a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 531–604Google Scholar

Bittner, Maria, and Hale, Ken. 1996b. “The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68Google Scholar

Bouchard, Denis. 1984. On the Content of Empty Categories. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Bouma, Gosse, Malouf, Robert, and Sag, Ivan A.. 2001. “Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 1–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan 1982. “Control and Complementation.” In Bresnan, Joan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 282–390Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan 1995. “Linear Order, Syntactic Rank, and Empty Categories: On Weak Crossover.” In Dalrymple, Mary, Kaplan, Ronald M., Maxwell, John T. III, and Zaenen, Annie, eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 241–274Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, and Mchombo, Sam. 1987. “Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chicheŵa.”Language 63: 741–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, and Annie Zaenen 1990. “Deep Unaccusativity in LFG.” In Dziwirek, Katarzyna, Patrick, Farrell, and Mejías-Bikandi, Errapel, eds., Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 45–57Google Scholar

Broadwell, George Aaron. In press. A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel

Butt, Miriam. 1993. “Object Specificity and Agreement in Hindi/Urdu.”CLS 29: 89–103Google Scholar

Chapin, Paul G. 1970. “Samoan Pronominalization.”Language 46: 366–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. “On Binding.”Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan, eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 89–155Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik 1993. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters.” In Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo, eds., Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 506–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Chung, Sandra, and Seiter, William J.. 1980. “The History of Raising and Relativization in Polynesian.”Language 56: 622–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, George N., McCloskey, James, Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1983. “String-Vacuous Rule Application.”Linguistic Inquiry 14: 1–17Google Scholar

Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North HollandGoogle Scholar

Cole, Peter 1983. “Switch-Reference in Two Quechua Languages.” In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Peter. 1987. “Null Objects in Universal Grammar.”Linguistic Inquiry 18: 597–612Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1978. “Ergativity.” In Lehmann, Winfred P., ed., Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press. 329–394Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1979. “Degrees of Ergativity: Some Chukchee Evidence.” In Plank, Frans, ed., Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press. 219–240Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1983. “Switch-Reference in Huichol: A Typological Study.” In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Cooreman, Ann. 1988. “Ergativity in Dyirbal Discourse.”Linguistics 26: 717–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooreman, Ann M., Barbara Fox, and Talmy Givón 1988. “The Discourse Definition of Ergativity: A Study of Chamorro and Tagalog Texts.” In McGinn, Richard, ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies. 387–425Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary. 1993. The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Stanford, Calif: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics, vol. xxxiv). New York: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, and Kaplan, Ronald M.. 2000. “Feature Indeterminacy and Feature Resolution.”Language 76: 759–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, Ron Kaplan, and Tracy Holloway King. 2001. “Weak Crossover and the Absence of Traces.” In Butt, Miriam and Holloway King, Tracy, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, University of Hong Kong. Online: CSLI Publications. 66–82. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01.htmlGoogle Scholar

Davies, William D. 1984. “Antipassive: Choctaw Evidence for a Universal Characterization.” In Perlmutter, David M. and Rosen, Carol G., eds., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 331–376Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. “Decomposing Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A Grammar of Yidi. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. “Corrections and Comments Concerning Heath's ‘Is Dyirbal Ergative?’.”Linguistics 17: 1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection.”Language 67: 547–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. “Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative.”Language 62: 808–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1987. “Grammatical Relations in Acehnese.”Studies in Language 11: 365–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1988. “The So-Called Passive of Acehnese.”Language 64: 104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 1983. “Subjects and Long-Distance Dependencies.”Linguistic Analysis 12: 245–270Google Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 1992. “Suppress α.”Linguistics 30: 999–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 1994. “A New Look at Agreement.” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, June 21–22, 1993

Falk, Yehuda N. 1996. “Case Typology and Case Theory.” Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Falk, Yehuda N. 1999. “Philippine Subjects in a Monostratal Framework.” Sixth annual conference of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, April 16–18, 1999, University of Toronto

Falk, Yehuda N. 2000. “Pivots and the Theory of Grammatical Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 00 Conference, University of California, Berkeley. Online: CSLI Publications. 122–138. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/5/lfg00.html

Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 2002. “Resumptive Pronouns in LFG.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, Athens. Online: CSLI Publications. 154–173. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/7/lfg02.html

Falk, Yehuda N. 2005. “Open Argument Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 05 Conference, University of Bergen. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/10/lfg05.html

Farrell, Patrick, Marlett, Stephen A., and Perlmutter, David M.. 1991. “Notions of Subjecthood and Switch Reference: Evidence from Seri.”Linguistic Inquiry 22: 431–456Google Scholar

Finer, Daniel L. 1985. “The Syntax of Switch-Reference.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 35–55

Foley, William A., and Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. “Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure.”Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–184Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Sag, Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. II. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Lynn 1983. “Switch Reference, Clause Order, and Interclausal Relationships in Maricopa.” In John Haiman and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 83–104Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, Eithne, Hung, Henrietta, and Travis, Lisa. 1992. “SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John, and Munro, Pamela 1983. “Introduction.” In Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ⅸ–ⅹⅴCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Ken. 1983. “Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Ken 1992. “Subject Obviation, Switch Reference, and Control.” In Larson, Richard K., Iatridou, Sabine, Lahiri, Utpal, and Higginbotham, James, eds., Control and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 51–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1999. “Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies Across Grammars.”Language 72: 244–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1979. “Is Dyirbal Ergative?.”Linguistics 17: 401–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. “Movement and Control.”Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. “On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James 1989. “Pro-Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory.” In Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Ken, eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. “The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory.”Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Ken Safir 1989. “The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory.” In Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Ken, eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, David E., and Postal, Paul M.. 1980. Arc Pair Grammar. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M., and Joan Bresnan 1982. “Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation.” In Bresnan, Joan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 173–281Google Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M., and John T. Maxwell, III 1995. “Constituent Coordination in Lexical-Functional Grammar.” In Mary Dalrymple, Ronald M. Kaplan, John T. Maxwell III, and Annie Zaenen, eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. First published in 1988, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING88), Budapest, vol. I. 199–210

Kaplan, Ronald M., and JohnMaxwell, T., III. 1996. Grammar Writer's Workbench (Technical Report). Palo Alto, Calif.: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/lfg/lfgmanual.psGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M., and Annie Zaenen 1989. “Long-Distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty.” In Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch, eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 17–42

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of “Subject.” In Li, Charles, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 303–333Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L., and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.”Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99Google Scholar

Kibrik, A. E. 1987. “Constructions with Clause Actants in Daghestanian Languages.”Lingua 71: 133–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Tracy Holloway. 1995. Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Langdon, Margaret, and Munro, Pamela. 1979. “Subject and (Switch-)Reference in Yuman.”Folia Linguistica 13: 321–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen, Thomas W. 1987. “The Syntactic Status of Ergativity in Quiché.”Lingua 71: 33–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne. 2001. “The Configurational Structure of a Nonconfigurational Language.”Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 61–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, Beth, and Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In Li, Charles N., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Lødrup, Helge 2000. “Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The Case of Norwegian Existentials and Resultatives.” In Butt, Miriam and Holloway King, Tracy, eds., Argument Realization. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 171–188Google Scholar

Lynch, John 1983. “Switch-Reference in Lenakel.” In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, Jim 1997. “Subjecthood and Subject Positions.” in Haegeman, Liliane, ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallinson, Graham, and Blake, Barry J.. 1981. Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Marantz, Alec 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Explanation in Linguistics.” In Zaenen, Annie, ed., Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 1–24Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Clause Structure in Malayalam.” In Bresnan, Joan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 504–589Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1983. “Functional and Anaphoric Control.”Linguistic Inquiry 14: 641–674Google Scholar

Moore, John, and Perlmutter, David M.. 2000. “What Does it Take to be a Dative Subject?”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike, and Hovdhaugen, Even. 1992. Samoan Reference Grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University PressGoogle Scholar

Munro, Pamela, and Gordon, Lynn. 1982. “Syntactic Relations in Western Muskogean: A Typological Perspective.”Language 58: 81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murasugi, Kumiko G. 1992. “Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

Nordlinger, Rachel. 1998. Constructive Case: Evidence from Australian Languages. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” BLS 4

Perlmutter, David M., ed., 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. 1984. “The Inadequacy of Some Monostratal Theories of Passive.” In Perlmutter, David M. and Rosen, Carol G., eds., Studies in Relational Gramma, vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal 1983. “Towards a Universal Characterization of Passivization.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Plank, Frans, ed., 1979. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1997. “The Morpholexical Nature of English to Contraction.”Language 73: 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin (2003) “Deconstructing Thematic Hierarchies.” Ms., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Stanford University

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.”Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Sadler, Louisa. 1999. “Non-Distributive Features in Welsh Coordination.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 99 Conference, The University of Manchester. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/4/lfg99.html

Sag, Ivan A., and Pollard, Carl. 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.”Language 67: 63–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saiki, Mariko. 1985. “On the Coordination of Gapped Constituents in Japanese.”CLS 21: 371–387Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic, or None of the Above.” In Li, Charles, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 493–518Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul 1987. “Tagalog.” In Comrie, Bernard, ed., The World's Major Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 936–958Google Scholar

Seiter, William J. 1983. “Subject–Direct Object Raising in Niuean.” In Perlmutter, David M., ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 317–359Google Scholar

Sells, Peter. 1984. “Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Shlonsky, Ur. 1988. “Complementizer-Cliticization in Hebrew and the Empty Category Principle.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, Jane. 1983. “Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

Simpson, Jane. 1991. Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, Jane, and Bresnan, Joan. 1983. “Control and Obviation in Warlpiri.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobin, Nicholas. 1987. “The Variable Status of complementizer-Trace Phenomena.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vainikka, Anne, and Levy, Yonata. 1999. “Empty Subjects in Finnish and Hebrew.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valin, Robert D. Jr., and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wechsler, Stephen, and Arka, I Wayan. 1998. “Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: An Argument Structure Based Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1984. “Grammatical Relations.”Linguistic Inquiry 15: 639–673Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 1997. “Four-Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 181–227

Ziv, Yael 1976. “On the Reanalysis of Grammatical Terms in Hebrew Possessive Constructions.” In Cole, Peter, ed., Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The Transformational-Generative Approach. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar