Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech
- Part I Phonological structure in signed languages
- Part II Gesture and iconicity in sign and speech
- Part III Syntax in sign: Few or no effects of modality
- Part IV Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement
- Index
- References
1 - Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech
- Part I Phonological structure in signed languages
- Part II Gesture and iconicity in sign and speech
- Part III Syntax in sign: Few or no effects of modality
- Part IV Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
This is a book primarily about signed languages, but it is not a book targeted just at the community of linguists and psycholinguists who specialize in research on signed languages. It is instead a book in which data from signed languages are recruited in pursuit of the goal of answering a fundamental question about the nature of human language: what are the effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure? By modality, I and the other authors represented in this book mean the mode – the means – by which language is produced and perceived. As anyone familiar with recent linguistic research – or even with popular culture – must know, there are at least two language modalities, the auditory–vocal modality of spoken languages and the visual–gestural modality of signed languages. Here I seek to provide a historical perspective on the issue of language and modality, as well to provide background for those who are not especially familiar with the sign literature. I also suggest some sources of modality effects and their potential consequences for the structure of language.
What's the same?
Systematic research on the signed languages of the Deaf has a short history. In 1933, even as eminent a linguist as Leonard Bloomfield (1933:39) could write with assurance that:
Some communities have a gesture language which upon occasion they use instead of speech. Such gesture languages have been observed among the lower-class Neapolitans, among Trappist monks (who have made a vow of silence), among the Indians of our western plains (where tribes of different language met in commerce and war), and among groups of deaf-mutes. […]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, and Wendy Sandler. 2000. Universal and particular aspects of sign language morphology. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press
and . 1972. A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition 1:173–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:173–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Bos, Heleen F. 1990. Person and location marking in SLN: Some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Current trends in European sign language research, ed. Siegmund Prillwitz and Tomas Vollhaber, 231–248. Hamburg: Signum
Brentari, Diane, ed. 2001. Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, , , and . 1999. Categorical perception of face actions: Their role in sign language and in communicative facial displays. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52:67–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheek, Adrianne. 2001. The phonetics and phonology of handshape in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX
Cheek, Adrianne. In press. Synchronic handshape variation in ASL: Evidence of coarticulation. Northeastern Conference on Linguistics (NELS) 31 Proceedings
, , and . 1998. Response from Corina, Neville and Bavelier. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2:468–470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmorey, Karen, ed. In press. Perspectives on classifier constructions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum
Feldman, Heidi. 1975. The development of a lexicon by deaf children of hearing parents or, There's more to language than meets the ear. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, PA
Fischer, Susan. 1975. Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In Word order and word order change, ed. Charles N. Li, 1–25. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press
Fromkin, Victoria A. 1973. Introduction. In Speech errors as linguistic evidence, ed. Victoria A. Fromkin, 11–45. The Hague: Mouton
and . 1977. The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science 197:401–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, Susan and McNeill, David. 1999. The role of gesture and mimetic representation in making language the province of speech. In The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution, ed. Michael C. Corballis and Stephen E. G. Lea, 155–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press
and . 1990. Beyond the input given: The child's role in the acquisition of language. Language 66:323–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groce, Nora E. 1985. Everyone here spoke sign language: Hereditary deafness on Martha's Vineyard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
, , and . 1998. What's right about the neural organization of sign language? A perspective on recent neuroimaging results. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2:465–468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kegl, Judy, Ann Senghas, and Marie Coppola. 1999. Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Language creation and language change, ed. Michel DeGraff, 179–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Klima, Edward S. and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton
Liddell, Scott K. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: pointing away from agreement. In The Signs Of Language revisited, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer
MacNeilage, Peter F. and Barbara L. Davis. 1993. Motor explanations of babbling and early speech patterns. In Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life, ed. B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. F. MacNeilage, and J. Morton, 341–352. Dordrecht: Kluwer
1998. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:499–546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1989. Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing. Memory and Cognition 17:740–754CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, Stephen, Karen Emmorey, and Diane Brentari. 2000. Categorical perception in American Sign Language. Linguistic Society of America, January, Chicago, IL
Meier, Richard P. 1982. Icons, analogues, and morphemes: The acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple, 175–190. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Meier, Richard P. 1993. A psycholinguistic perspective on phonological segmentation in sign and speech. In Phonetics and Phonology. Vol. 3: Current Issues in American Sign Language Phonology, ed. Geoffrey R. Coulter, 169–188. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Meier, Richard P. 2000b. Shared motoric factors in the acquisition of sign and speech. In The Signs of Language Revisited, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 331–354. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Meier, Richard P. 2002. The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Current developments in the study of signed language acquisition, ed. Gary Morgan and Bencie Woll. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Meier, Richard P., Claude Mauk, Gene R. Mirus, and Kimberly E. Conlin. 1998. Motoric constraints on early sign acquisition. In Proceedings of the Child Language Research Forum, Vol. 29, ed. Eve Clark, 63–72. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press
, , , and . 1997. Silent mandibular oscillations in vocal babbling. Phonetica 54:153–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, Richard P. and Raquel Willerman. 1995. Prelinguistic gesture in deaf and hearing children. In Language, gesture, and space, ed. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 391–409. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
. 1998. Syntactic–semantic interaction of Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backward verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics 1:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1975. The sign language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language Studies 9:291–308Google Scholar
Moody, Bill. 1983. La langue des signes, Vol. 1: Histoire et grammaire. Paris: Ellipses
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan, and Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
, , , , , , , , , and . 1998. Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 95: 922–929CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newport, Elissa L. 1982. Task specificity in language learning? Evidence from speech perception and American Sign Language. In Language acquisition: The state of the art, ed. Eric Wanner and Lila Gleitman, 451–486. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. and Ursula Bellugi. 1978. Linguistic expression of category levels in visual–gestural language. In Cognition and categorization, ed. Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Newport, Elissa L. and Richard P. Meier. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1: The data, ed. Dan I. Slobin, 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Newport, Elissa L. and Ted Supalla. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In The Signs of Language Revisited, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 103–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Padden, Carol A. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA
and . 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence from the ontogeny of language. Science 251:1493–1496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and . 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:707–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poizner, Howard, Edward S. Klima, and Ursula Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Polich, Laura G. 2000. The Search for Proto-NSL: Looking for the roots of the Nicaraguan deaf community. In Bilingualism and identity in Deaf communities, ed. Melanie Metzger, 255–305. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
Quadros, Ronice M. de. 1999. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. Unpublished dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Rathmann, Christian. 2000. Does the presence of person agreement marker predict word order in signed languages? Paper presented at 7th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Resarch (TISLR 2000). University of Amsterdam, July
Sapir, Edward 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916/1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library. (English translation of Cours de linguistic générale. Paris: Payot.)
Singleton, Jennie and Elissa L. Newport. In press. When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology
Smith, Wayne. 1990. Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwanese Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 8. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press
Stokoe, William C., Dorothy C. Casterline, and Carl G. Croneberg. 1965. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
Supalla, Samuel J. 1991. Manually Coded English: The modality question in signed language development. In Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 2: Psychology, ed. Patricia Siple and Susan D. Fischer, 85–109. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Supalla, Ted and Elissa L. Newport. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. Patricia Siple, 91–133. New York: Academic Press
Sutton-Spence, Rachel and Bencie Woll. 1998. The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
. 1979. Rhythmical stereotypes in normal hearing infants. Animal Behaviour, 27, 699–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1986. The duration of syllables in American Sign Language. Language and Speech 29:263–280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1982. Single finger extension: Toward a theory of naturalness in sign language phonology. Sign Language Studies 37:289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. 2000. In The Signs of Language Revisited, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 23–47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- 65
- Cited by