Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Theoretical Framework and Research Design
- 2 The Emergence and Development of the PHARE Programme
- 3 Negotiations on the Reform of the Common Commercial Policy
- 4 Negotiations on the Communitarisation of Visa, Asylum and Immigration Policy
- 5 Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Theoretical Framework and Research Design
- 2 The Emergence and Development of the PHARE Programme
- 3 Negotiations on the Reform of the Common Commercial Policy
- 4 Negotiations on the Communitarisation of Visa, Asylum and Immigration Policy
- 5 Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Explaining Decisions in the European Union , pp. 317 - 355Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
1998. Democracy in Europe. How to Legitimize Politics in a Non-State Polity. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Achermann, Alberto 1995. ‘Asylum and Immigration Policies: From Co-operation to Harmonisation’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 127–40.
Act4Europe 2003. IGC: Don't Horsetrade in the Name of National Interest!, a Campaign of the Civil Society Contact Group. Brussels.
Ad Hoc Group on Immigration 1991. Report from the Ministers Responsible for Immigration. Brussels.
(ed.) 1997. An Anatomy of the World Trade Organisation. Boston, MA: Hammond Suddards Solicitors, Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
1997. ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 3: 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. ‘Role Conceptions and the Politics of Identity in Foreign Policy’, Arena Working Papers, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_8.htm (last accessed on 3 July 2006)Google Scholar
1995. Fin de Siecle Social Theory. Relativism, Reduction and the Problem of Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Amato, Giuliano 2003. Statement at the 17th Plenary Session, European Parliament, ‘Background Information: Convention 03/04: Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’, Brussels, 3 April.
AMCHAM 2000. ‘Towards a Wider and More Open Europe: Business calls on EU Leaders to Agree to Significant Reform at Nice’, Brussels, 23.11., http://www.eucommittee.be/Press/2000/nov232000.htm (last accessed on 3 July 2006).
Amnesty International, Cimade, ECRE, Finnish Jurists for Human Rights, ILPA, Jura Hominis, JUSTICE, NJCM, OMCT-Europe, Open Society Institute, Statewatch 2003. ‘Towards a Constitution for Europe: Justice and Home Affairs – Joint Comments from Non-Governmental Organisations for the IGC’, Brussels, 1 October.
1989. ‘Perestroika and the Integration of the European Community’, European Access, December, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Antoniadis, Antonis 2004. ‘The Participation of the European Community in the World Trade Organisation: An External Look at the European Union Constitution-Building’, in and (eds), EU Law for the 21st Century: Rethinking the New Legal Order, Vol I. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Legal Integration: Theorising the Legal Dimension of European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36: 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Kenneth and Bulmer, Simon 1996. ‘United Kingdom’, in Rometsch and Wessels (eds), pp. 253–90.
and 1998. ‘Integrating Law: An Introduction’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnull, Anthony 1996. ‘The Scope of the Common Commercial Policy: A Coda on Opinion 1/94’, in Emiliou and O'Keeffe (eds), pp. 343–63.
Aspinwall, Mark and Schneider, Gerald 2001. ‘Institutional Research on the European Union: Mapping the Field’, in Schneider and Aspinwall (eds), pp. 1–18.
and 2004. ‘A Bridge Too Phare? EU Pre-Accession Aid and Capacity-Building in the Candidate Countries’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. ‘The Emerging European Immigration Regime’, Journal of Common Market Studies 35: 497–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1994. ‘The Politics of Immigration: Introduction’, West European Politics 17: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. ‘World Trade: Brussels Strives to Call the Tune on Trade’, Financial Times 12 March.Google Scholar
1999. ‘Transnational Interests in the European Union: Globalization and Changing Organization in Telecommunications and Electricity’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 363–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BDA and BDI 2001. Kernforderungen der deutschen Wirtschaft für eine handlungs- und wettbewerbsfähige Europäische Union, Positionspapier zur Debatte über die Zukunft Europas. Berlin, 8.
2005. The Dynamics of European Integration: Why and When EU Institutions Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belgian Government 1995. Note de politique du Gouvernement au Parlement concernant la Conférence intergouvernmentale de 1996, October.
Belgian Presidency 2001. ‘Evaluation of the Conclusions of the Tampere European Council’, Note to the General Affairs Council/European Council, 14926/01, Brussels, 6 December.
2002. ‘The European Parliament and the WTO: Positions and Initiatives’, European Foreign Affairs Review 7: 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996a. Propositions du Benelux dans le cadre de la Conférence intergouvernmentale: coopération policière et judiciaire, November.Google Scholar
Benelux 2000. ‘Memorandum from the Benelux’, Information Note, CONFER 4787/00, Brussels, 19 October.
2002. ‘Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials’, Arena Working Papers WP 02/33.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36: 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, Roland 1995. ‘The Third Pillar and the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 383–90.
and (eds) 1995. Justice and Home Affairs in the European Union: The Development of the Third Pillar. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.Google Scholar
Bindi Calussi, Federiga 1998. ‘The Cost of Staying Out of the European Union: Third States and Foreign Multinational Lobbying’, in Cafruny and Peters (eds), pp. 65–91.
Bogdandy, A. 2003. ‘Links Between National and Supra-National Institutions. A Legal View of a New Communicative Universe’, in (ed.) Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘Mind the Gap! European Integration between Level and Scope’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12: 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. ‘The EC in the WTO and Advisory Opinion 1/94: An Echternach Procession’, Common Market Law Review 32: 763–87.Google Scholar
, and (eds) 1995. The Uruguay Round Results: A European Layers' Perspective, College of Europe. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.Google Scholar
2004. ‘The Logic of Access to the European Parliament: Business Lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 473–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. ‘Trapped in the Supranational-Intergovernmental Dichotomy: A Response to Stone Sweet and Sandholtz’, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey 1997. ‘Rational Choice Political Theory’, in (ed.) Political Theory – Tradition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: CUP, pp. 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkhorst, Laurens Jan 1997. ‘Pillar III’, in European Policy Centre 1997b, p. 49
1996. ‘Perspektiven der Regierungskonferenz für die Europäische Union’, Zentrum für Europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht: Vorträge und Berichte 78: 1–21.Google Scholar
Brok, Elmar 1997a. ‘The European Parliament’, in European Policy Centre 1997b, p. 45.
2001. ‘Die Ergebnisse von Nizza. Eine Sichtweise aus dem Europäischen Parlament’, Integration 24: 86–93.Google Scholar
2002. What the Constitution of the European Union will Need to Say on “Freedom, Justice and Security”, CONV 436/02. Brussels.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Immigration, Asylum and Terrorism: A Changing Dynamic Legal and Practical Developments in the EU in Response to the Terrorist Attacks of 11.09’, European Journal of Migration and Law 4: 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. ‘The Governance of the European Union, A New Institutionalist Approach’, Journal of Public Policy 13: 351–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, Simon and Burch, Martin 1998. ‘The “Europeanisation” of Central Government: The UK and Germany in Historical Institutionalist Perspective’, Manchester Papers in Politics, European Policy Research Unit, Paper No. 6/1998.
and 1987. The Federal Republic of Germany and the European Community. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft 1996. ‘Stellungnahme zu dem Papier der GD I der EG-Kommission Regierungskonferenz – Aussenwirtschaft: Warum muss der Artikel 113 angepasst werden’, EA1-110006/23, Bonn 8.10.96.
and 1993. ‘Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’, International Organization 47: 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. ‘European Union Immigration Policy: Phantom, Fantasy or Fact?’ West European Politics 17: 168–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds) 1998. The Union and the World: the Political Economy of a Common European Foreign Policy. The Hague, Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
and (eds) 1993. The State of the European Community: The Maastricht Debates and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
1992. ‘Regulation of Immigration in 1993: Pieces of the European Community Jig-Saw Puzzle’, International Migration Review 26: 353–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, David 1992. ‘The 1992 Initiative: Causes and Consequences’, in Sbragia (ed.), pp. 23–74.
Cameron, David 1995. ‘Transnational Relations and the Development of European Economic and Monetary Union’, in Risse-Kappen (ed.), pp. 37–78.
1995. ‘Research Design, Falsification, and the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide’, American Political Science Review 89: 457–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, J. and Keeler, J. T. S. 1995. ‘The European Union and Regional Integration Theory’, in Rhodes and Mazey (ed.), pp. 29–62.
Caporaso, J. and Stone Sweet, Alec 2001. ‘Institutional Logics of European Integration’, in Stone Sweet, Alec, Fligstein, Neil and Sandholtz, Wayne (eds), The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221–39.
(ed.) 2001. Constructing Europes Identities: The External Dimension. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
1996. Asylum and immigration policy, Group of European People's Party. Helsinki: Study Days, pp. 115–8.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Damian 1996. ‘Legal Base and the External Relations of the European Community’, in Emiliou and O'Keeffe (eds), pp. 46–61.
1999a. ‘Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe’, International Studies Quarterly 43: 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999b. ‘Social construction and integration’, Journal of European Policy 6: 545–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001a. ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change’, International Organization 55: 553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001b. ‘Constructing European institutions’, in Schneider and Aspinwall (eds), pp. 19–39.
2001c. ‘From Meta to Substantive Theory? Social Constructivism and the Study of Europe’ and ‘Constructivism and Integration Theory: Crash Landing or Safe Arrival?’, European Union Politics, 2: 2.Google Scholar
Chirac, Jacques 1996. ‘Conseil Européen de Dublin – Conférence de Presse du Président de la Republique, M. Jacques Chirac’, Ministère des Affaires étrangères.
2002. ‘The Role of Supranational Actors in EU Treaty Reform’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9 : 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. ‘The Amsterdam Process: A Structurationist Perspective on EU Treaty Reform’, European Integration Online Papers, 3: 1.Google Scholar
, and 1999. ‘The Social Construction of Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 528–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churches' Commission for Migrants in Europe 1995. ‘Third Country Nationals in the European Union: The Case for Equal Treatment’, European Parliament, Audition Publique, La Conférence intergouvernementale de 1996: le Parlement européene a l'écoute des citoyens, Volume I, Brussels, 17–18 October.
1998. ‘Integrating the Environment: The European Court and the Construction of Supranational Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J. and Sides, J. 2004. ‘Is it the Nation, Europe, or the Nation and Europe? Trends in Political Identities at Century's End’, in Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., Brewer, M. (eds.), pp. 161–85.
1997. ‘The Evolution of the Large Firm as a Political Actor in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 4: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘The European Business Interest and the Nation State: Large-firm Lobbying in the European Union and Member States’, Journal of Public Policy 18: 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. ‘Securing Subsidiarity: Mechanisms for Allocating Authority in Tiered Regimes’, in (ed.) Subsidiarity in the Governance of the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Translating Quantitative Methods for Qualitative Researchers: The Case of Selection Bias’, American Political Science Review 89: 461–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities 1985. White Paper on the Internal Market, COM (85) 331 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1988. Communication of the Commission on the Abolition of Controls of Persons at Intra-Community Borders, COM (88) 640 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1989. Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on Economic aid to the Republic of Hungary and the Polish People's Republic, COM (89) 536 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1991a. Communication de la Commission au Conseil et au Parlement européen sur le droit d'asile, SEC (91) 1857 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1991b. Proposal on the Extension of Article 113, CONF-UP 1742, 28.02.91.
Commission of the European Communities 1992a. Assistance for Economic Restructuring in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: An Operation Guide. Luxembourg.
Commission of the European Communities 1992b. Commission Communication to the Council and to Parliament on Abolition of Border Controls, SEC (92) 877 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1993a. Towards a Closer Association with the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Communication by the Commission to the Council, SEC (93), 648 final. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1993b. Conclusions of the Presidency – European Council in Copenhagen, 21–22 June 1993, SI (93) 500. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1993c. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Reinforcing the Effectiveness of the Internal Market, COM (93) 256 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1993d. Report to the Council on the Possibility of Applying Article K.9 of the Treaty on European Union to Asylum Policy, SEC (93) 1687 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1993e. Communication of the Council and the European Parliament: (I) Proposal for a Decision […] establishing the Convention on the crossing of external frontiers of the Member States; (II) Proposal for a regulation […] determining the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of a visa when crossing the external borders of the Member States, COM (93) 684 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1994a. The Europe Agreements and Beyond: A Strategy to Prepare the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe for Accession, Communication from the Commission to the Council, COM (94) 320 final. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1994b. Follow Up to Commission Communication on ‘The Europe Agreements and Beyond: A Strategy to Prepare the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe for Accession’, Communication from the Commission to the Council, COM (94), 361 final. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1994c. Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on Immigration and Asylum Policy, COM (94) 23 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1995a. Presidency Conclusions: Cannes European Council, 26 and 17 June 1995. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1995b. Phare 1994: Annual Report, Phare Information Unit, DG 1A, COM (95), 366 final.
Commission of the European Communities 1995c. ‘Proposal for a Directive on the Elimination of Controls on Persons Crossing Internal Frontiers’, COM(95) 347 final, Official Journal, C 289, 31 October.
Commission of the European Communities 1995d. Intergovernmental Conference 1996: Commission Report for the Reflection Group. Brussels, 10 May.
Commission of the European Communities 1996a. Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 1279/96 of 25 June 1996 Concerning the Provision of Assistance to Economic Reform and Recovery in the New Independent States and Mongolia, OJ, No L165/1–11.
Commission of the European Communities 1996b. The European Union's nuclear safety programme in Central and Eastern Europe and the New Independent States, Information Unit – Phare and Tacis, DG 1A.
Commission of the European Communities 1996c. ‘Reinforcing Political Union and Preparing for Enlargement’, Commission's Opinion on the Convening of an IGC, February 1996, Intergovernmental Conference on the Revision of the Treaties, Collected texts. Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
Commission of the European Communities 1996d. Justice and Home Affairs provisions in the EC Treaty – a Possible Location, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3912/96. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1996e. Conférence Intergouvernementale: d'un espace de liberté, securité et de justice, Note d'information du Secrétariat général diffusé sous l'autorité de M. Oreja, SEC (96) 2004. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1996f. External Economic Relations, CONF/3890/96. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 1996g. Internal paper of DG I, ‘Anmerkungen zur Sellungnahme des BMWi zum dem Kommissionsvorschlag über die Anpassung des Artikels 113’, Brussels, 16.10.96.
Commission of the European Communities 1996h. DG I, Speaking Brief Anpassung des Artikels 113, p. 15 October 1996.
Commission of the European Communities 1997a. JHA – Free Movement of Persons, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3817/97.
Commission of the European Communities 1997b. ‘Article 113 – Possible Fallbacks’, note for the file, by F. Perreau de Pinninck, Brussels, 17.03.97.
Commission of the European Communities 1998. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Follow-up to Recommendations of the High-Level Panel on the Free Movement of Persons. Brussels, 1 July.
Commission of the European Communities 1999. Adapting the Institutions to Make a Success of Enlargement, Brussels, 10 November.
Commission of the European Communities 2000a. ‘Single Market Scoreboard’, Commission Staff Working Paper, May.
Commission of the European Communities 2000b. ‘The Reform of Article 133 by the Nice Treaty: The Logic of Parallelism’, in Frequently Asked Questions. Intergovernmental Conference discusses Article 133, December, http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/faqs/rev133_en.htm (last accessed on 15 July 2004).
Commission of the European Communities 2000c. Opinion on the IGC, 26 January 2000, COM (2000).
Commission of the European Communities 2002a. The Enlargement Process and the Three Pre-accession Instruments, Enlargement DG, February.
Commission of the European Communities 2002b. Contribution from Mr Barnier and Mr Vitorino, Members of the Convention: ‘The Community Method’, CONV 231/0. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 2002c. Report from the Commission: General Report on Pre-Accession Assistance (PHARE – ISPA – SAPARD) in 2000, [SEC (2002) 1418], COM (2002) 781 final. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 2002d. Communication from the Commission to the Convention, 22 May 2002: A Project for the European Union, CONV 229/02. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 2002e. Biannual Update of the Scoreboard to Review Progress on the Creation of an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the European Union – Second Half of 2002, COM (2002) 738 final. Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities 2002f. Contribution to a Preliminary Draft Constitution – Feasibility Study (Penelope), 4 December.
Commission of the European Communities 2002g. Communication from the Commission on the Institutional Architecture – For the European Union – Peace, Freedom and Solidarity. Brussels, 5 December 2002, COM (2002) 728 final.
Commission of the European Communities 2003a. The Doha Development Agenda (DDA) After Cancun, Statement by the European Commission, 25 September.
Commission of the European Communities 2003b. A Constitution for the Union, Opinion of the Commission. Brussels, 17 September.
Commission of the European Communities 2004. Report from the Commission: General Report on Pre-Accession Assistance (PHARE – ISPA – SAPARD) in 2002, [SEC (2003) 1477], COM (2003) 844 final. Brussels.
Consultative Commission on Racism and Xenophobia 1995. Activities of the Consultative Commission on Racism and Xenophobia – Final Report, 6906/1/95.
Corporate Europe Observer 2000. ‘Intergovernmental Conference 2000: Business and the Amsterdam Leftovers’, Issue 6, April.
Council of the European Communities 1989. Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on Economic Aid to the Republic of Hungary and the Polish People's Republic, OJ, No L 375/11–12. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1994a. Council Report to the Essen European Council on the Preparation Strategy for the Accession of Associated CEEC. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1994b. Report from the Permanent Representatives Committee to the Council on the Code of Conduct between the Council, the Member States and the Commission on the Post-Uruguay Round Negotiations on Services, 6948/94. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1996a. Draft Compromise Proposal: Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) Concerning the Provision of Assistance to Economic Reform and Recovery in the New Independent States and Mongolia. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1996b. ‘Presidency Report to the European Council on the Progress of the Conference’, Intergovernmental Conference on the Revision of the Treaties, Collected Texts. Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
Council of the European Union 1996c. ‘The European Union Today and Tomorrow’, in Intergovernmental Conference on the Revision of the Treaties: Irish Presidency, Collected texts, General Secretariat of the Council. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1997a. The Amsterdam Treaty as Signed on 2 October 1997, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF 4007/97. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1997b. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF 4007/97 ADD1. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 1997c. Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF 4007/97 ADD2. Brussels.
Council of the European Union 2004a: ‘Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on Minimum Standards for the Qualification and Status of Third Country Nationals […]’. Official Journal L 304/12, 30.9.2004.
Council of the European Union 2004b. ‘Council Decision 2004/927/EC […] Providing for Certain Areas Covered by Title IV [TEC…] to be Governed by the Procedure Laid Down in Article 251 of That Treaty’, Official Journal L 396, 31 December.
Council of the European Union 2005. Directive on Minimum Standards on Procedures in Member States for Granting and Withdrawing Refugee Status, 12983/05, 2005/0031 (CNS), 17.11.2005.
Cram, Laura 1996. ‘Integration Theory and the Study of the European Policy Process’, in Richardson (ed.), pp. 40–58.
Cremona, Marise 2003. ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’, Common Market Law Review40: 1347–66.
2003. ‘Ein ausgewogener Gesamtkompromiss: Die Ergebnisse des Konvents aus Sicht der Bundesregierung’, Integration 26: 351–6.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, ‘Rethinking Law in Neofunctionalist Theory’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 310–26.
de Charette, Hervé 1996. ‘Conseil Européen de Turin: Intervention Du Ministre des Affaires Etrangères, M. Hervé de Charette’, Ministère des Affaires étrangères.
de Lobkowicz, Wenceslas 1994. ‘Intergovernmental Co-operation in the Field of Migration – From the Single European Act to Maastricht’, in Monar and Morgan (eds), pp. 99–122.
1994. France's Aid Effort to Central and Eastern Europe: A Case Study of a Donor's Interests in Aid-Giving, Master Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Jean-Luc 1996. ‘Conférence de Jean-Luc Dehaene’, Primier Ministre, Brussels, 24 April 1996.
den Boer, Monica 1994. ‘The Quest for European Policing: Rhetoric and Justification in a Disorderly Debate’, in Anderson and den Boer (eds), pp. 174–96.
den Boer, Monica 1996. ‘Justice and Home Affairs: Co-operation Without Integration’, in Wallace and Wallace (eds), pp. 389–409.
1997a. ‘Wearing the Inside Out: European Police Co-operation between Internal and External Security’, European Foreign Affairs Review 2: 491–508.Google Scholar
den Boer, Monica 1997b. ‘Travel Notes on a Bumpy Journey from Schengen via Maastricht to Amsterdam’, in den Boer (ed.), pp. 147–54.
1992. [1991]: The Other Heading. Reflections on Today's Europe. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1991. ‘Beyond Correlations: Towards a Causal Theory of War’, International Studies Quarterly 35: 337–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. ‘The EC's Common Commercial Policy and the Treaty on European Union – An Overview of the Negotiations’, World Competition – Law and Economics Review 16: 67–80.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Treaty Reform in the European Union: The Amsterdam Process’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 615–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, Thomas and Wiener, Antje 2004. ‘Introducing the Mosaic of Integration Theory’, in Wiener and Diez (eds), pp. 1–21.
Dill, Janina and Nicolas Lamp 2004. ‘Neofunktionalismus – eine sozialkonstruktivistische Lesart’, Term Paper – Seminar on European Integration, University of Dresden.
Dinan, Desmond 1997. ‘The Commission and the Reform Process’, in Edwards and Pijpers (eds), pp. 188–211.
2004. ‘Governance and Institutions: The Convention and the Intergovernmental Conference’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 42: 27–42.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Governance and Institutions: A New Constitution and a New Commission’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 43: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docksey, Christopher and Williams, Karen 1994. ‘The Commission and the Execution of Community Policy’, in Edwards and Spence (eds), pp. 117–44.
Dodd, Tom, Ware, Richard and Weston, Alison 1997. The European Communities (Amendment) Bill: Implementing the Amsterdam Treaty, Research Paper No. 1997/112. International Affairs and Defence Section, House of Commons Library.
D'Oliveira, H. 1994. ‘Expanding External and Shrinking Internal Borders’, in and (eds), Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty, London: Chancery Press, pp. 261–76.Google Scholar
Donner, J. P. H. 1993. ‘Abolition of Border Controls’, in Schermers et al. (eds), pp. 5–26.
Drüke, Luise 1995. ‘Harmonisation of Asylum Law and Judicial Control Under the Third Pillar’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 167–87.
1997. The Amsterdam Treaty: Text and Commentary, Federal Trust. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
2001. ‘From Amsterdam Left-overs to Nice Hangovers’, The International Spectator 36: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. ‘Der Beitrag des Europäischen Parlaments zum Konvent: Treibende Kraft für einen Konsens’, Integration 26: 3–9.Google Scholar
Dutch Presidency 1997a. Note de la Presidence: Mise en place progressive d'un espace de liberté, securité et de justice, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3823/97. Brussels.
Dutch Presidency 1997b. Addendum to Dublin II: General Outline for Draft Revision of the Treaties, Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/2500/96 ADD.1. Brussels.
Dutch Presidency 1997c. Liberté, Securité et justice, second Dutch text on JHA, Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, SN 539/97 (C 40). Brussels.
Dutch Presidency 1997d. Liberté, Securité et justice, Textes consolides du project de traite, Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, SN 600/97 (C 101). Brussels.
Dutch Presidency 1997e. Draft Treaty of Amsterdam, Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/4000/97. Brussels.
Dutch Presidency 1997f. External Economic Relations, Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, SN 456/97. Brussels.
Dyer, Carl, Dyer, Barbara, Hathcote, Jan and Rees, Kathleen 1997. ‘Service Markets in the 21st Century: The Impact on the New WTO Regime’, Fatemi, Khosrow (ed.), International Trade in the 21st Century. Oxford, New York: Pergamon, pp. 213–34.
Eberlie, Richard 1993. ‘The Confederation of British Industry and Policy-Making in the European Community’, in Mazey and Richardson (eds), pp. 201–12.
and 1999. European Citizenship and the National Legacies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Geoffrey 1996. ‘National Sovereignty vs. Integration? The Council of Ministers’, in Richardson (ed.), pp. 127–47.
and (eds) 1997. The Politics of European Treaty Reform: The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and Beyond. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Edwards, Geoffrey and Spence, David 1994. ‘The Commission in Perspective’, in Edwards and Spence (eds), pp. 1–23.
and 1977. The Council of Ministers of the European Community and the President in Office. London: Federal Trust.Google Scholar
1991. ‘The External Dimension of the EC Internal Market – A Portrait’, World Competition – Law and Economics Review 15: 5–24.Google Scholar
Egeberg, Morten 1998. ‘Transcending Intergovernmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making’, Arena Working Papers WP 24/1998, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp98_24.htm (last accessed on 08 June 2006).
1984. ‘The Scope of Article 113 of the EEC Treaty’, in Etudes de droit des Communautés Européennes: Mélanges offerts á Pierre-Henri Teitgen. Paris: Pedone, pp. 139–61.Google Scholar
1994. The Economics of the European Community, fourth edition. New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Elgström, Ole 2003. ‘“The Honest Broker”? The Council Presidency as a Mediator’, in (ed.), European Union Council Presidencies – A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 38–54.Google Scholar
2002. The EU's Common Commercial Policy: Institutions, Interests and Ideas, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Emiliou, Nicholas 1996b. ‘The Allocation of Competence Between the EC and its Member States in the Sphere of External Relations’, in Emiliou and O'Keeffe (eds), pp. 31–45.
and (eds) 1996. The European Union and World Trade Law. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
ERT 1997. Intergovernmental Conference, Letter Sent to EU Heads of Government in June 1997, 2 June.
ERT 2002. ‘EU Governance: ERT Discussion Paper’, Contribution to the Convention on the Future of Europe. Brussels.
Esders, Elke 1995. ‘The European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs – The Committee Responsible for Justice and Home Affairs’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 259–76.
Euro Citizen Action Service 1996. Giving Substance to Citizens' Europe in a Revised Treaty. Brussels.
Eurochambres 2003. ‘Business Demands a Successful IGC’, Press Release. Brussels.
European Council on Refugees and Exiles 1995. ‘Position on the Functioning of the Treaty on European Union in Relation to Asylum Policy’, European Parliament, Audition Publique, La Conférence intergouvernementale de 1996: le Parlement européene a l'écoute des citoyens, I, Brussels, 17–18 October.
European Court of Justice 1995. ‘Report of the Court of Justice on Certain Aspects of the Application of the Treaty on European Union’.
European Parliament 1991. ‘Resolution on the PHARE Programme’, Official JournalC280: 118–19.
European Parliament 1993a. Report of the Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs on Co-operation in the Field of Justice and Internal Affairs under the Treaty on European Union, rapporteur: Mr Carlos Robles Piquer, EP Doc No. A3-0215/93.
European Parliament 1993b. ‘Resolution on European Immigration Policy’, Official JournalC 255, pp. 184–6.
European Parliament 1994a. ‘1994 General Budget: Resolution on the Draft General Budget of the European Communities for the Financial Year 1994’, Official JournalC20: 161–6.
European Parliament 1994b. ‘Resolution on the Conclusions of the Fact-finding Mission by the Committee on Budgetary Control to the Czech Republic on the Management of Appropriations under the PHARE Programme’, Official JournalC205: 84.
European Parliament 1994c. ‘Resolution on the General Principles of European Refugee Policy’, Official JournalC 44, pp. 106–9.
European Parliament 1995a. Relations Between the European Parliament and the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe, Directorate General for Research, Working Papers, Central and Eastern Europe Series.
European Parliament 1995b. Resolution on the functioning of the Treaty on European Union with a View to the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference – Implementation and Development of the Union, rapporteur: Jean-Louis Bourlanges and David Martin, 17 May.
European Parliament 1995c. Working Document on the Process in the Field of Justice and Home Affairs, Institutional Affairs Committee, draftsman: Laurens Jan Brinkhorst, A4-0102/95/PART III, PE 212.450/fin./Part III.
European Parliament 1995d. Opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs for the Committee on Institutional Affairs, draftsman: José Barros Moura, A4-0102/95/PART II, PE 212.450/fin./Part II.
European Parliament 1996a. ‘Resolution Embodying (i) Parliament's Opinion on the Convening of the Intergovernmental Conference, and (ii) an Evaluation of the Work of the Reflection Group and a Definition of the Political Priorities of the European Parliament with a View to the IGC’, Intergovernmental Conference on the Revision of the Treaties, Collected texts. Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
European Parliament 1996b. Communication by the Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs, rapporteur: A. Oostlander, A4-0135/96.
European Parliament 1997a. Opinion for the Committee on Institutional Affairs on the Amsterdam Treaty, Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs, draftsman: Claudia Roth, A4-0347/97.
European Parliament 1997b. Report on the Amsterdam Treaty, Committee on Institutional Affairs, co-rapporteurs: Inigo Mendez de Vigo and Dimitris Tsarsos, A4-0347/97, PE 223.314/fin.
European Parliament 2000. ‘European Parliament's Proposal for the Intergovernmental Conference’, 14094/1999, 13 April 2000.
European Parliament 2003a. Background Information: Convention 03/ 04: Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Brussels, 3 April.
European Parliament 2003b. ‘Resolution on the Draft Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe and the European Parliament's Opinion on the Convening of the Intergovernmental Conference’, provisional edition, 11047/2003, 24 September.
European Policy Centre 1997a. ‘A Threat to Europe's Power to Act in Global Trade’, Occasional Paper, Brussels, May.
European Policy Centre 1997b. Making Sense of the Amsterdam Treaty. Brussels.
European Services Forum 2001. ‘ESP Paper on The Temporary Movement of Key Business Personnel’, Brussels, 17 September.
European Trade Union Confederation 1995a. For a Strong, Democratic and Open European Union Built on Solidarity. Brussels.
European Trade Union Confederation 1995b. ‘Three Challenges for the 1996 IGC: Employment, Solidarity, Democracy’, Our Priorities: ETUC Resolutions 1995–1996. Brussels.
European Union Migrants' Forum 1995. ‘Third Country Nationals in the European Union’, European Parliament, Audition Publique, La Conférence intergouvernementale de 1996: le Parlement européene a l'écoute des citoyens, Volume I. Brussels, October.
Eurostat 2003, ‘New Asylum Applications in the EU, 1986 to 2002’, Luxemburg, http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/doc_centre/asylum/statistical/docs//asylum_update_1986_2003_en.pdf (last accessed on 15 July 2004).
Eurostat 2004. EC Economic Data Pocket Book, Luxemburg, No. 2.
1991. ‘Counterfactuals and Hypothesis in Political Science’, World Politics 43: 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1975. ‘National Administration Elites and European Integration: Saboteurs at work?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1995. ‘Credible Equilibria in Games with Changing Utility’, Games and Economic behavior 10: 284–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnish Government 1996. Finland's Points of Departure and Objectives at the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference, Report to the Parliament by the Council of State.
Fischer, Joschka 2003. ‘Suggestion for Amendment of Article III-163 (revised)’, European Convention Website, http://european-convention.eu.int/amendments.asp?content=848&lang=DE (last accessed June 2005).
2003. ‘EU Governance Techniques in the Creation of a Common European Policy on Immigration and Asylum’, European Public Law 9: 533–62.Google Scholar
Fortescue, John Adrian 1995. ‘First Experiences with the Implementation of the Third Pillar Provisions’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 19–28.
French Government 1997. Etablissement progressif d'un espace de liberté, de securité et de justice, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3824/97.
French Presidency 2000a. ‘Extension of Qualified Majority Voting’, Presidency Note, CONFER 4753/00, Brussels, 3 July.
French Presidency 2000b. ‘Note of the Presidency’, September, CONFER 4770/1/00 REV1, p. 1.
French Presidency 2000c. ‘Project de Traité de Nice’, CONFER 4816/00.
Friederichs, Tania 1995. ‘Some Comments on GATS’, in Bourgeois, Berrod and Fournier (eds), pp. 395–9.
1994. ‘Policy-making in a System of Multi-level Governance – the Commission of the European Community and the Restructuring of the Telecommunications Sector’, Journal of European Public Policy 1: 177–94.Google Scholar
1995. ‘The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union’, International Organization 49: 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘The Representation of “Migrants’ Interests” in the European Union', Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 24: 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000a. Immigration and European Integraton: Towards Fortress Europe?Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
2000b. ‘Lobbying for Migrant Inclusion in the EU: New Opportunities for Transnational Advocacy?’, Journal of European Public Policy 7: 632–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. ‘Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison’, in Lauren, Paul Gordon (ed.), Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York: Free Press, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
and 1985. ‘Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making’, Advances in Information Processing in Organizations 2: 21–58.Google Scholar
1991. Politics and Policy in the European Community, second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1996. Politics and Policy in the European Community, third edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
German Government 1996. Communitarisation of Customs Co-operation, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF 3938/96. Brussels.
2000. ‘Programme Implementation – Procedures and the Role of the Parties Involved’, Commission, Overview of the Phare Programme and the New Pre-Accession Funds. Luxembourg: OOPEC.Google Scholar
1996. ‘Die Außenkompetenzen der EG im Wandel: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Praxis und Rechtsprechung’, Europarecht 31: 145–66.Google Scholar
and 2004. ‘The Politics of European Union Immigration Policy: Institutions, Salience, and Harmonization’, The Policy Studies Journal 32: 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Der Gipfel von Laeken: Erste Etappe auf dem Weg zu einer europäischen Verfassung?’, Integration 25: 99–110.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Die Europäische Union vor ihrer Konstitutionalisierung: Eine Bilanz der ersten Verfassungsentwürfe’, Integration 26: 17–30.Google Scholar
1997. Dictionary of Trade Policy Terms. Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Die Rolle der Kommission im Konvent: Eine Gratwanderung’, Integration 26: 371–98.Google Scholar
and 2001. ‘Keynote Article: The Treaty of Nice – Negotiating a Poisoned Chalice?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greek Government 1996. For a Democratic European Union with Political and Social Content. Hellenic Republic, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
1995. ‘Setting the Agenda for a New Europe: “The ERT and EC 1992”’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 501–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greens/EFA 2001. ‘Towards a Real European Policy on Immigration and Asylum’, 4 July 2001. (http://greens-efa.org/en/documents/detail.php?id =56) (last accessed on 19 May 2004).
1993. The European Community and the Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. ‘International Terrorism and EU Immigration, Asylum and Borders Policy: The Unexpected Victims of 11 September 2001’, European Foreign Affairs Review 8: 331–46.Google Scholar
2003. ‘The Constitution of a European Immigration Policy Domain. A Political Sociological Approach’, Journal of European Public Policy 10: 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyomarch, Alain 1997. ‘Co-operation in the Fields of Policing and Judicial Affairs’, in , , and (eds), New Challenges to the European Union: Policies and Policy-Making. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company, pp. 123–49.Google Scholar
1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–7. London: Stevens.Google Scholar
1960. Consensus Formation in the Council of Europe. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1961. ‘International Integration: The European and Universal Process’, International Organization 15: 366–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst 1964a. ‘Technocracy, Pluralism and the New Europe’, in (ed.), A New Europe?Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, p. 62–88.Google Scholar
1964b. Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1968. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–7, second edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1970. ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing’, International Organization 24: 607–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration’, International Organization 30: 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 2001. ‘Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-functionalism?’ in Christiansen, Jørgensen and Wiener (eds), pp. 22–31.
2004. ‘Introduction: Institutionalism or constructivism?’ in The Uniting of Europe: Politics, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, third edition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. xiii-lvi.Google Scholar
and 1964. ‘Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections About Unity in Latin America’, International Organisation, pp. 705–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Co-ordination’, International Organization 46: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981a. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1981b. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1986. ‘Entgegnung’, in and (eds), Kommunikatives Handeln: ‘Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns’. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 327–405.Google Scholar
1995. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen and Moravcsik, Andrew 1993. ‘The Political Economy of Financial Assistance to Eastern Europe, 1989–1991’, in and (eds) After the Cold War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 246–85.Google Scholar
1992. ‘Perspectives of a Harmonisation of the Law of Asylum after the Maastricht Summit’, Common Market Law Review 29: 917–39.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Visa Regulations and Third-Country Nationals in EC Law’, Common Market Law Review 31: 969–95.Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Kay 1995. ‘Migration Law and Policy within the Third Pillar of the Union Treaty’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 95–126.
2001. ‘Maximum des Erreichbaren – Minimum des Notwendigen? Die Ergebnisse von Nizza’, Integration 24: 94–101.Google Scholar
1973. ‘European Integration: Forward March, Parade Rest, or Dismissed?’, International Organization 27: 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R. J. 1990. ‘Neo-functionalism’, in and (eds.), Framework for International Co-operation. London: Pinter, pp. 139–50.Google Scholar
1994. The Foundations of European Community Law, third edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hartwig, Ines 1997. The Role of the European Parliament in Shaping the EU's Strategy on Central and Eastern Europe, Paper Prepared for the Second UACES Research Conference. Loughborough.
Heclo, Hugh 1978. ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’, in (ed.), The New American Political System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl 1959. ‘The Logic of Functional Analysis’, in (ed.), Symposion on Sociological Theory. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Héritier, Adrienne 1998. The European Polity, Deadlock and Development, Paper Given in EUI Seminar on the Amsterdam Treaty. Florence, March.
1999. Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Common Commercial Policy after Nice: Sisyphus would have Done a Better Job’, Common Market Law Preview 39: 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. (eds) 2004. Identities in Europe and the Institutions of the European Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
2002. ‘The Europeanisation of Europe: Endogenous and Exogenous Dimensions’, Journal of European Integration 24: 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High-Level Panel on the Free Movement of Persons 1997. Final Report, C4-0181/97. Brussels.
1995. ‘The ECJ's Opinion 1/94 on the WTO – No Surprise, but Wise?’, European Journal of International Law 6: 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. ‘The Capability–Expectations Gap, or Conceptualising Europe's International Role’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1996. Globalisation in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Approaches to the Study of the EC: The Challenge to Comparative Politics’, West European Politics 17: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1996. Reconsidering European Migration Policies: The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the Reform of the Maastricht Treaty. Brussels: Migration Policy Group, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
2002. Intervention at the Plenary Session of the European Convention held on 21 March.Google Scholar
and (eds) 1995. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1964. ‘The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes’, Journal of Common Market Studies 3: 85–101.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley 1995. ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? France, European Integration and the Fate of the Nation-State’, in (ed.), The European Sisyphus: Essays on Europe 1964–1994. Boulder, CO: Westview Press [reprinted from: Hoffmann, S. 1964. Decline or Renewal? France Since the 1930s, Viking Penguin].Google Scholar
1995. ‘Bridging the Capability–Expectations Gap: A Case Study of the CFSP Joint Action on South Africa’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 555–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, T. 1993. ‘Free Movement and Integration of Non-EC Nationals and the Logic of the Internal Market’, in Schermers, H., Fliterman, C., Kellermann, A., Haersolte, J., and van de Meent, G. W. (eds), pp. 497–511.
Hooghe, Liesbet 1996. ‘Building a Europe with the Regions: The Changing Role of the European Commission’, in (ed.), Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–126.Google Scholar
1999. ‘Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents? Explaining Orientations of Senior Commission Officials towards European Integration’, Comparative Political Studies 32: 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Lisbet and Marks, Gary 2005. ‘The Neofunctionalists Were (almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration’, Constitutionalism Web-Papers, ConWEB No. 5/2005.
Hoyer, Werner 1997. ‘The German Government’, in European Policy Centre 1997b.
2000. ‘The European Union and the Securitization of Migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 38: 751–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Shaping a Harmonised Migration Policy for an Enlarged Europe’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 3: 325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immigration Law Practitioners' Association 2001. Scoreboard on the Proposal for a Council Regulation Establishing the Criteria and Mechanisms for Determining the Member State Responsible for Examining an Asylum Application. London, http://www.ilpa.org.uk/submissions/dublinIIscoreboard.html (last accessed on 03 July 2006).
1994. ‘Rule of Law in den internationalen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen: Die Welthandelsorganisation’, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 40: 717–23.Google Scholar
Ireland, Patrick 1995. ‘Migration, Free Movement, and Immigrant Integration in the EU: A Bifurcated Policy Response’, in Leibfried and Pierson (eds), 231–66.
Irish Presidency 1996a. Presidency Note: Minsiterial Meeting on 1 October 1996 (Luxembourg) – Justice and Home Affairs, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3924/96. Brussels.
Irish Presidency 1996b. Presidency Introductory Note – An Area of Freedom and Security: Introduction of Community Methods and Procedures for Certain Aspects, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3976/96. Brussels.
Irish Presidency 1996c. Presidency Note: Ministerial Meeting on 28 October 1996 – External Action of the Union, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3956/96. Brussels.
Irish Presidency 2004. ‘IGC 2003 – Meeting of Heads of State and Government’, Presidency Note to Delegations, CIG 82/04, Brussels, 16 June.
Italian Presidency 1996. Note de la Présidence, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF/3850. Brussels.
Italian Presidency 2003. ‘Non-institutional Issues, Including Amendments in the Economic and Financial Field’ Note to Delegations, CIG 37/03, Brussels, 24 October.
1999. ‘In the Name of the Market: How the European Commission Paved the Way for Monetary Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 475–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘The Governance Approach to European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate 2004. ‘Governance and Institutional Development’, in Wiener and Diez (eds), pp. 97–115.
Jaks, Jaroslav 1993. ‘The EC and Central and Eastern Europe’, in and (eds), Making Policy in Europe: the Europeification of National Policy-Making. London: Sage, pp. 237–54.Google Scholar
2000. ‘Neofunctionalist Theories and the Development of European Social and Labour Market Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 38: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. European Economic Law, the Nation-State, and the Maastricht Treaty. Berlin: Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar
and 1997. ‘Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-solving’ European Law Review Journal 3: 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Haven or Hell?: Asylum Policies and Refugees in Europe. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Knut Eric and Christiansen, Thomas 1998. The Amsterdam Process: A Structurationist Perspective on EU Treaty Reform, paper presented at the International Seminar on Theoretical Approaches and Treaty Reform. Brussels.
Juppé, Alain 1996. ‘Discours de M. Alain Juppé’, Premier ministre, Assemblée nationale, 13 March 1996, Ministère des Affaires étrangères.
1996a. Human Rights and the 1996–7 Intergovernmental Conference: The Democratic Deficit. London.Google Scholar
1996b. Human Rights and the 1996–7 Intergovernmental Conference – The Union Divided: Race Discrimination and Third Country Nationals in the European Union. London.Google Scholar
2003. ‘Knowledge, Power and Monetary Bargaining: Central Bankers and the Creation of Monetary Union in Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 10: 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. ‘Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security’, in (ed.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph 1975. ‘International Interdependence and Integration’, in and (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Hoffmann, Stanley 1991. ‘Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s’, in Keohane and Hoffmann (eds), pp. 1–40.
and 1991 The New European Community: Decision-making and Institutional Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
and 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Zu Fragen der Regierungskonferenz 1996 ueber die Fortentwicklung und Reform der Strukturen der Europaeischen Union’, interview with the Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs, Stuttgarter Zeitung29.03.95.Google Scholar
and 1997. ‘Justiz- und Innenpolitk in der Europaeischen Union: Gemeinsam fuer die Sicherheit der Buerger’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung21.02.1997.Google Scholar
1992. Decision-Making in the European Community. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
1997. ‘COREPER and Political Committee – Damaging for CFSP?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs X: 222–36.Google Scholar
1999. Evolving Decision-making Structures of European Foreign Policy and Home Affairs: Leading Towards and Beyond the Fusion Concept, University of Cambridge, Centre of International Studies.Google Scholar
Kohl, Helmut and Chirac, Jacques 1995. ‘Déclaration du chancelier Helmut Kohl et du Président Jacques Chirac au Président du Conseil européen’, 6 December 1995.
Kohl, Helmut and Chirac, Jacques 1996. ‘Déclaration du chancelier Helmut Kohl et du Président Jacques Chirac au Président du Conseil européen’, Bonn and Paris, 9 December 1996.
1996. ‘Catching up with Change: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 3: 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. ‘The Role of Law in the Next Stage of European Integration’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 35: 925–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. ‘The European Community's Response to the New Eastern Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 213–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranz, Jerzy 2003. ‘Between Nice and Brussels or Life after Death’, Warsaw Center for International Relations, Reports and Analyses 03/04/A.
Kreinin, Mordechai and Schmidt-Levine, Marcella 1997. ‘The WTO and the International Trading Environment’, in Fatemi, Khosrow (ed.) International Trade in the 21st Century. Oxford, New York: Pergamon, pp. 29–48.
1996. ‘Gemeinsame Handelspolitik: Die EU braucht eine starke Außenvertretung’, EU Magazin 7–8: 18–21.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘Die Reichweite der gemeinsamen Handelspolitik nach dem Vertrag von Amsterdam – eine Debatte ohne Ende?’, Europarecht 33: 223–41.Google Scholar
and 2001. ‘Progress or Stagnation?: The Common Commercial Policy After Nice’, European Foreign Affairs Review 6: 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenzler, Horst-Günter and Schneider, Henning 1997. ‘The Question of Consistency’, in , , and (eds), Foreign Policy of the European Union: From EPC to CFSP and Beyond. London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 133–52.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Pieter-Jan 1995. ‘The New WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Impact on the Community’, in Bourgeois, Berrod and Fournier (eds), pp. 87–114.
Laffan, B. 2004. ‘The European Union and its Institution as “Identity Builders”’, in Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., Brewer, M. (eds).
Lamy, Pascal 2002a. La politique commerciale et la Convention: un exemple à parfaire. Brussels: External Action Working Group of the Convention, 15 October.
Lamy, Pascal 2002b. The Future of Europe: What Global Role For an Enlarged EU?. Berlin: Institut für Europäische Politik, http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/lamy/speeches_articles/spla94_en.htm (last accessed October 2004).
Lamy, Pascal 2002c. ‘Convention: l'urgence’, in Le Monde 13 September, http://europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/lamy/speeches_articles/indexplsub_en.htm#conv
Lamy, Pascal 2003. The Convention and Trade Policy: Concrete Steps to Enhance the EU's International Profile. Brussels: European Policy Center, 5 February.
2001. ‘The Europeanization of Refugee Policies: Normative Challenges and Institutional Legacies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 851–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavenex, Sandra and Uçarer, Emek M. 2002. ‘Introduction: The Emergent EU Migration Regime and Its External Impact’, and (eds), Migration and the Externalities of European Integration, Lanham, MD: Lexingtiion, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
2004. ‘The EC in GATT/WTO Negotiations: From Rome to Nice – Have EC Trade Policy Reforms Been Good Enough for a Coherent EC Trade Policy in the WTO?’, European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 8.Google Scholar
Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul 1995. ‘Semisovereign Welfare States: Social Policy in a Multitiered Europe’, in Leibfried and Pierson (eds.), pp. 43–77.
and (eds) 1995. European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
2001. ‘The French Presidency: The Half Success of Nice’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey 1995. The European Union as a “Multiperspectival Polity”, Paper Prepared for the Fourth Biennial International Conference of the European Community Studies Association. Charleston, SC. 11–14 May.
Lewis, Jeffrey 1998a. Wearing a Janus-Face: The Permanent Representatives of the European Union, Paper for the Eleventh International Conference of Europeanists. Baltimore, MD, 26–28 February.
1998b. ‘Is the “Hard Bargaining” Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36: 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. ‘The Methods of Community in EU Decision-making and Administrative Rivalry in the Council's Infrastructure’, Journal of European Public Policy 7: 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libertarians Against Nice 2002. ‘Nice and the Corporate Agenda: The Changes to Article 133’, press release, http://struggle.ws/ireland/nice/pr/corporate.html (last accessed on 03 July 2004).
1971. ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method’, American Political Science Review LXV: 682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. ‘The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research’, Comparative Political Studies 8: 158–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The Creation and Development of Schengen: A Case of Neofunctionalist Spill-over? Master Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
1963. The Political Dynamics of European Integration. Stanford, CA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1966. ‘Integration as a Source of Stress on the European Community System’, International Organization 20: 233–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds) 1971. Regional Integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Peter 1991. ‘The European Commission’, in Keohane and Hoffmann (eds), pp. 85–132.
Ludlow, Peter 1997. ‘Institutional Balance’, in European Policy Centre 1997b, p. 52.
Luxembourg Government 1995. Aide-mémoire du Gouvernement luxembourgeois sur la Conférence Intergouvernemental de 1996.
Luxembourg Presidency 1991. Draft Treaty, Document CONF-UP-UEM 2008/91.
and 1996. The External Relations of the European Communities: A Manual of Law and Practice. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
MacMillan, K. 1991. The Management of European Public Affairs, Paper Prepared for Presentation to a ECPA/Conference Board Meeting. Brussels, 30–31 May.
and 2004. ‘The European Convention: Bargaining in the Shadow of Rhetoric’, West European Politics 27: 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. ‘Market Integration and Regulation: Europe After 1992’, Metroeconomica 43: 131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. ‘Deregulation or Re-Regulation? Policy-making in the European Community since the Single Act’, EUI Working Papers in Political and Social Sciences. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 1996. ‘A European Regulatory State?’, in Richardson (ed.), pp. 264–76.
and 1998. ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization 52: 943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcussen, Martin and Risse Thomas 1997. A Europeanisation of Nation-state Identities? Conceptual Considerations and Research Design, Paper Presented at the Workshop on National Identities. Florence: Robert Schumann Centre, European University Institute, 21–22 November.
and 1999. ‘Constructing Europe? The Evolution of French, British and German Nation State Identities’, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 614–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maresceau, Marc 1993. ‘The Concept of “Common Commercial Policy” and the Difficult Road to Maastricht’, in Maresceau, Marc (ed.), The European Community's Commercial Policy After 1992: The Legal Dimension, pp. 3–19.
2001. ‘Zuwanderungspolitik in der Europäischen Union: Europäisierte Lösungen oder Politik des kleinsten gemeinsamen Nenners?’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 8/2001, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary 1992. ‘Structural Policy in the European Community’, in Sbragia (ed.), pp. 191–224.
Marks, Gary 1993. ‘Structural Policy and Multi-Level Governance in the European Community’, in Cafruny and Rosenthal (eds), pp. 391–410.
, and 1996. ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 341–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martikonis, Rytis 2002. Representative of the Lithuanian Government, Intervention at the Plenary Session of the European Convention, Brussels, 6 June 2002. For verbatim reports of the Convention sessions see, http://www.europarl.eu.int/europe2004/index_en.htm (last accessed June 2005).
1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1994. The Limits and Limitations of Intergovernmentalism: From De-Constructive to Constructive Criticism. Lund: Paper Presented within the Master of European Affairs Programme, University of Lund.Google Scholar
and 1995. ‘Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett’, International Organization 49: 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. ‘Revisiting the European Court of Justice’, International Organization 52: 177–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘Entscheidungseffizienz und Handlungsfähigkeit nach Nizza: die neuen Anwendungsfelder für Mehrheitsentscheidungen’, Integration 24: 133–45.Google Scholar
2003a. ‘Die Methode des Konvents – ein Modell deliberativer Demokratie?’, Integration 26: 130–51.Google Scholar
, 2003b. ‘The Legislative Powers and Impact of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41: 227–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1997. The Evolution of the Single European Market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2000. ‘Women, Power and Public Policy in Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, Special Issue, 7, 3 pp. 333–45.Google Scholar
Mazey, Sonia and Richardson, Jeremy 1993. ‘Conclusion: A European Policy Style?’, in Mazey and Richardson (eds), pp. 246–58.
Mazey, Sonia and Richardson, Jeremy 1994. ‘The Commission and the Lobby’, in and (eds), The European Commission. London: Cathermill, pp. 169–87.Google Scholar
Mazey, Sonia and Richardson, Jeremy 1997a. ‘The Commission and the Lobby’, in and (eds), The European Commission, second edtition. London: Cathermill, pp. 178–98.Google Scholar
Mazey, Sonia and Richardson, Jeremy 1997b. ‘Agenda Setting, Lobbying and the 1996 IGC’, in Edwards and Pijpers (eds), pp. 226–48.
1998. Original Sin in a Brave New World: An Account of the Negotiation of the Treaty of Amsterdam. Dublin: Institute of European Affairs.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Andrew and Jordan, Grant 1993. ‘The Rationality of Lobbying in Europe: Why are Euro-Groups so Numerous and so Weak? Some Evidence from the Car Industry’, in Mazey and Richardson (eds), pp. 122–61.
McNamara, Kathleen 1993. ‘Common Markets, Uncommon Currencies: Systems Effects and European Community’, in and (eds), Coping with Complexity in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 303–27.Google Scholar
Mehaignerie, Pierre 1994. ‘Internal Security’, Group of the European People's Party publication, June/July 1994.
1998. ‘Leadership in European Union Negotiations: The Presidency of the Council’, International Negotiation 3, pp. 413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. ‘Who speaks for Europe? The Delegation of Trade Authority in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, Sophie and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso 2000. ‘EU Trade Policy: The Exclusive versus Shared Competence Debate’, in and (eds) The State of the European Union: Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival, Vol. 5, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 325–46.Google Scholar
Meunier, Sophie and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso 2002. ‘EU Trade Policy: The Exclusive versus shared competence Debate’, in and (eds), The State of the European Union: Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 325–46.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan and Sørensen, V. 1993. ‘Interdependence or Integration? A National Choice’, in and (eds) The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory, 1945–1992. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Monar, Jörg 1994. ‘The Evolving Role of the Union Institutions in the Framework of the Third Pillar’, in Monar and Morgan (eds), pp. 69–83.
Monar, Jörg 1995. ‘Democratic Control of Justice and Home Affairs: The European Parliament and the National Parliaments’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 243–58.
Monar, Jörg 1997. ‘European Union – Justice and Home Affair: A Balance Sheet and an Agenda for Reform’, in Edwards and Pijpers (eds), pp. 326–39.
1998a. ‘Justice and Home Affairs’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 36: 131–42.Google Scholar
1998b. ‘Justice and Home Affairs in the Treaty of Amsterdam: Reform at the Price of Fragmentation’, European Law Review 23: 320–33.Google Scholar
2000. ‘Die Entwicklung des “Raumes der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts”. Perspektiven nach dem Vertrag von Amsterdam und dem Europäischen Rat von Tampere’, Integration 23: 18–33.Google Scholar
2001a. ‘Die Kommission nach dem Vertrag von Nizza. Ein gestärkter Präsident und ein geschwächtes Organ?’, Integration 24: 114–23.Google Scholar
2001b. ‘The Dynamics of Justice and Home Affairs. Laboratories, Driving Factors and Costs’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 747–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. ‘Der Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts im Verfassungsentwurf des Konvents’, Integration 26: 536–49.Google Scholar
2004a. ‘Justice and Home Affairs’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 42: 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004b. ‘The EU as an International Actor in the Domain of Justice and Home Affairs’, European Foreign Affairs Review 9: 395–415.Google Scholar
and (eds) 1994. The Third Pillar of the European Union: Co-operation in the Field of Justice and Home Affairs. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press and College of Europe.Google Scholar
1996. The Single Market and Tomorrow's Europe. Progress Report from the European Commission, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
1991. ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization 45: 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 611–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1999. ‘A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation’, International Organization 53: 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001a. ‘Bringing Constructivist Theories of the EU out of the Clouds: Have they Landed Yet?’, European Union Politics 2 pp. 231–49.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew 2001b. ‘Constructivism and European Integration: A Critique’, in Christiansen, Jørgensen and Wiener (eds), pp. 176–188.
and 1998. ‘Keynote Article: Federal Ideals and Constitutional Realities in the Treaty of Amsterdam’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36: 13–38.Google Scholar
and 1999. ‘Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Roger 1986. ‘Communication Between Political Elites’, in Morgan and Bray (eds) pp. 120–35.
Morgan, Roger 1994. ‘The Third Pillar: An Introduction’, in Monar and Morgan (eds), pp. 13–18.
and (eds) 1986. Partners and Rivals in Western Europe: Britain, France and Germany. Aldershot: Gower Publishers.Google Scholar
1997. ‘Justiz und Inneres nach Amsterdam – Die Neuerungen in erster und dritter Säule’, Integration 20: 292–304.Google Scholar
1989. ‘1992 and the Political Integration of Europe: Neofunctionalism Reconsidered’, Journal of European Integration 13: 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Philip 1995. ‘The Commission's Approach to the Third Pillar: Political and Organisational Elements’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 277–300.
Nanz, Klaus-Peter 1994. ‘The Harmonisation of Asylum and Immigration Legislation Within the Third Pillar of the Union Treaty – A Stocktaking’, in Monar and Morgan (eds), pp. 123–33.
1996. Immigration and Asylum Policy and the Protection of Borders, Group of European People's Party, Helsinki Study Days, pp. 97–99.Google Scholar
Neuwahl, Nanette 1995. ‘Judicial Control in Matters of Justice and Home Affairs: What Role for the Court of Justice’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 301–20.
Nicholson, M. 1996. ‘The Continued Significance of Positivism?’, in Smith, S., Booth, K., and Zalewski, M. (eds), pp. 128–48.
1996. The Concept of Spillover, the European Commission and PHARE, MPhil dissertation, August. University of Cambridge, Centre of International Studies.Google Scholar
1997a. Between Fusion and Engrenage: The Formulation and Adaptation of National Trade Policies, Paper Presented at the UACES Research Conference. Loughborough, 10–12 September.Google Scholar
1997b. ‘Europhoria, Friendship and Wine: The Stuff that Built Another Europe’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 11: 277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘The PHARE Programme and the concept of Spillover: Neofunctionalism in the Making’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 428–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. The Internal and External Dimensions of European Union Decision-Making: Developing and Testing a Revised Neofunctionalist Framework, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Between Communicative Action and Strategic Action: The Article 113 Committee and the Negotiations on the WTO Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement’, Journal of European Public Policy 11: 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006 forthcoming. ‘Beyond Problem-Solving and Bargaining: Genuine Debate in EU External Trade Negotiations’, International Negotiation Journal 10.Google Scholar
Niemann, Arne and Edwards, Geoffrey 1997. ‘Theoretical approaches to the Intergovernmental Conference 1996/97: A Neo-functionalist Approach’, 22nd Annual British International Studies Association Conference in Leeds, December.
1995. ‘The Leadership Capacity of the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 2: 603–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, Simon 1988. ‘Where the European Commission Comes in’, in and (eds), European Political Co-operation in the 1980s. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1970. ‘Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model’, International Organization 24: 796–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971. Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
1987. ‘Nuclear Learning and U.S. – Soviet Security Regimes’, International Organization 41 pp. 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Conor 2001. ATTAC Ireland, ‘Submission to the Forum on Europe, 1st December 2001’, http://www.forumoneurope.ie/submission_docs/attac.doc (last accessed on 15 July 2004).
1995a. ‘The Emergence of a European Immigration Policy’, European Law Review 20: 20–36.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Keeffe, David 1995c. ‘Reforming the Third Pillar: Transparency and Structural Reform in the Long-term Perspective’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 397–422.
1999. ‘Community and Member State Competence in External Relations Agreements of the EU’, European Foreign Affairs Review 4: 7–36.Google Scholar
1997. Testing Integration Theories: The Development of A European Air Transport Policy, Paper Presented to the 2nd UACES Research Conference 1997. Loughborough.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘The Liberalisation and Reregulation of Air Transport’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 447–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1994. Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford/Cambridge, M: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Communities 1999. Action Plan of the Council and the Commission on How Best to Implement the Provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam on an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice – Text Adopted by the Justice and Home Affairs Council of 3 December 1998 C 19.
2002. ‘The Many Faces of Europeanisation’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreja, Marcelino 1997. Newsletter on the Intergovernmental Conference, February 1997, http://europa.eu.int/en/agenda/igc-home/eu-doc/letter/fev97en.htm (last accessed on 15 July 2004).
1987. Efficiency, Stability, and Equity: A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community: A Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paemen, Hugo 1996. ‘The EC and the WTO Agenda’, in and (eds). Challenges to the New World Trade Organisation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
1996. Coming Together or Pulling Apart: The European Union's Struggle With Immigration and Asylum. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Patijn, Michiel 1997. ‘The Dutch Presidency’, in European Policy Centre 1997b, pp. 38–9.
1997. ‘Agricultural Policy Reform in the European Community: A Three-Level Game Analysis’, International Organization 51: 135–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1991. ‘Catapulted into Leadership: The Community's Trade and Aid Policies vis-à-vis Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Integration 24: 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. ‘External Relations in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities’, Common Market Law Review 16: 615–45.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Agenda-setting in the European Community’, Journal of European Public Policy 1: 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. ‘Technology Policy in Europe: Explaining the Framework Programme and Eureka in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Common Market Studies 29: 269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John 1992. ‘The European Technology Community: Policy Networks in a Supranational Setting’, in and (eds), Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. ‘Decision-making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy 2: 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Nikolaj 1993. ‘The European Union and Foreign and Security Policy’, in Nørgaard, Pedersen and Petersen (eds), pp. 9–30.
and 1999. Decision-making in the European Union. Basingstoke and New York: Oalgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. ‘The Treaty of Amsterdam: Ambition and Realism’, Revue du Marché Unique Européene 3: 17–52.Google Scholar
1998b. ‘Amsterdam and European Institutional Balance: A Panel Discussion’, Harvard Jean Monnet Chair Working Paper Series 14: 18–29.Google Scholar
1996. ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 29: 123–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 1998. ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, in Sandholtz and Stone Sweet (eds), pp. 27–58.
Pierson, Paul and Leibfried, Stephan 1995. ‘The Dynamics of Social Policy Integration’, in Leibfried and Pierson (eds), pp. 432–65.
1986. ‘European Community and the Nation State: A Case for Neo-federalism?’, International Affairs 62: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991a. European Community: The Building of a Union, second edtition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1991b. The European Community and Eastern Europe, The Royal Institute of International Affairs. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2001. ‘International Relations Theory and European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 2004. ‘The New Institutionalisms and European Integration’, in Wiener and Diez (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–56.
Portuguese Presidency 2000a. ‘Possible Extension of Qualified Majority Voting – Introductory Note’, Presidency Note, CONFER 4705/1/00 REV1, Brussels, 11 February.
Portuguese Presidency 2000b. ‘Possible Extension of Qualified Majority Voting’, Presidency Note, CONFER 4710/00, Brussels, 22 February.
Praesidium 2003. Draft Articles on External Action in the Constitutional Treaty, CONV 685/03, Convention Secretariat. Brussels.
Presidency Conclusions 1999a. Tampere European Council, 15–16 October.
Presidency Conclusions 1999b. Helsinki European Council, 10–11 December.
Presidency Conclusions 2001. European Council Meeting in Laeken, SN 300/1/01 REV 1.
Presidency Conclusions 2002. Seville European Council, 21–22 June.
2001. ‘The EU Conference in Nice. More than a Minimum Consensus for Europe and Germany’, At Issue, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Prodi, Romano 2000a. To Nice and Beyond, Speech at the European Parliament on the European Council of Nice, Brussels: European Parliament, SPEECH/00/475, 29 November.
Prodi, Romano 2000b. Speech at the European Parliament on the European Council of Nice. Strasbourg: European Parliament, SPEECH/00/499, 12 December.
1972. ‘Of Blind Men, Elephants, and European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 10: 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization 42: 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘The Italian Presidency’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 42: 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Vom GATT zur WTO – fairer Welthandel order Macht des Stärkeren?’, Wirtschaftsdienst 3: 156–60.Google Scholar
1986. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht/Lancaster, PA/Boston, MA: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1988. ‘Between Self-Restraint and Activism: A Judicial Policy for the European Court’, European Law Review 13: 140–58.Google Scholar
2005. ‘The Irish Presidency: A Diplomatic Triumph’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 43: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reflection Group 1995a. Reflection Group's Report. Brussels, 5 December.
Reflection Group 1995b. Progress Report: From the Chairman of the Reflection Group on the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference. Madrid, SN 509/1/95 (REFLEX 10) REV 1.
Regelsberger, Elfriede and Wessels, Wolfgang 1984. ‘Verwaltungsprozesse Bonner Europapolitik – verwalten statt gestalten?’, in and (eds), EG-Mitgliedschaft: ein vitales Interesse der Bundesrepublik Deutschland?Bonn: Europa Verlag.Google Scholar
and 1998. ‘Capital Unbound? The Transformation of European Corporate Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 406–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. “‘Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization 54: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas 2004. ‘Social Constructivism and European Integration’, in Wiener and Diez (eds), pp. 160–76.
2005. ‘Neofunctionalism, European Identity, and the Puzzles of European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. ‘Something Rotten and the Social Construction of Social Constructivism: A Comment on Comments, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 775–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas and Wiener, Antje 2001. ‘The Social Construction of Social Constructivsm’, in Christiansen, Jørgensen and Wiener (eds), pp. 199–205.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1995a. ‘Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Introduction’, in Risse-Kappen (ed.), pp. 3–33.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1995b. ‘Structures of Governance and Transnational Relations: What have We Learned?’, in Risse-Kappen (ed.), pp. 280–313.
(ed.) 1995c. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. ‘Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2001. ‘EU Commercial Policy after Nice’, EUI Briefing Paper, No. 3, Sussex European Institute.Google Scholar
Rometsch, Dietrich 1996. ‘The Federal Republic of Germany’, in Rometsch and Wessels (eds), pp. 61–104.
and (eds) 1996. The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rosamond, Ben 2001. ‘Discourses of Globalization and European Identities’, in Christiansen, Jørgensen and Wiener (eds), pp. 158–73.
2005. ‘The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12: 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1994. ‘Inside The Delors Cabinet’, Journal of Common Market Studies 32: 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. ‘L'Engrenage, Collegial Style, and the Crisis Syndrome: Lessons from Monetary Policy in the European Community’, Journal of Common Market Studies 13: 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein’, Policy Sciences 21: 129–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. 1993. ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Assessment, Revisions, and Implications for Scholars and Practitioners’, in and (eds), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO, Oxford: Westview, pp. 211–45.Google Scholar
1992. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Co-operation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1993a. ‘Institutions and Collective Action: The New Telecommunications in Western Europe’, World Politics 45: 242–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993b. ‘Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht’, International Organization 47: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santer, Jacques 1995. Discours du Président Santer devant la Commission Institutionelle du Parlement Européen. Brussels, 21 March.
Santer, Jacques 1996. Avis de la Commission sur la CIG: Intervention M. Jacques Santer au Parlement Européen, Speech/96/53. Brussels.
(ed.) 1992. Europolitics: Institutions and Policy-making in the “New” European Community. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Sbragia, Alberta 1993. ‘EC Environmental Policy: Atypical Ambitions and Typical Problems?’, in Cafruny and Rosenthal (eds), pp. 337–52.
Sbragia, Alberta 1994. ‘From “Nation-State” to “Member-State”: The Evolution of the European Community’, in (ed.), 1994. Europe after Maastricht: American and European Perspectives. Providence: Berghahn Books, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar
1988. ‘The Joint-Decison Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration’, Public Administration 66: 239–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1972. ‘The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States’, International Organization 26: 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. ‘Innenpolitische Zusammenarbeit in Europa zwischen Maastricht und Regierungskonferenz 1996’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 1–2: 19–34.Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry, Fliterman, Cees, Kellermann, Alfred, Haersolte, Johan and van de Meent, Gert-Wim 1993. ‘Report of the Conference on Free Movement of Persons in Europe, 11–12 September 1992’, in Schermers et al. (eds), pp. 521–46.
, , , and (eds) 1993. Free Movement of Persons in Europe: Legal Problems and Experiences. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1988. ‘The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration’, Public Administration 66: 239–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization 55: 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969. ‘Three Neo-functional Hypotheses About International Integration’, International Organization 23: 161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe 1971. ‘A Revised Theory of Regional Integration’, Lindberg, Leon and Scheingold, Stuat (eds), pp. 232–64.
Schmitter, Philippe 1996a. ‘Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories’, in Marks, Scharpf, Schmitter and Streek (eds) pp. 1–14.
Schmitter, Philippe 1996b. ‘Imagining the Future of the Euro-Polity with the Help of New Concepts’, in Marks, Scharpf, Schmitter and Streek (eds) pp. 121–50.
2000. How to Democratize the European Union … and Why Bother?, London, MD: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 2004. ‘Neo-Neofunctionalism’, in Wiener and Diez (eds), 46–74.
1998. ‘Der Amsterdamer Vertrag – Neuregelungen der Zusammenarbeit im Bereich der Inneren Sicherheit’, Zeitschrift für Innere Sicherheit 1: 16–20.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerald 1994. ‘Getting Closer at Different Speed. Strategic Interaction in Widening European Integration’, in and (eds), Game Theory and International Relations. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerald and Aspinwall, Mark 2001a. ‘Moving beyond Outworn Debates: A New Institutionalist Research Agenda’, in Schneider and Aspinwall (eds), 177–87.
and (eds) 2001b. The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
and 1994. ‘The Change of Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited Information Model of European Integration’, International Organization 48: 633–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Dermot 1983. ‘Adapting the Machinery of Central Government’, in (ed.), Ireland and the European Communities: Ten Years of Membership. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, pp. 68–88.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, Ulrich and Wallace, Helen 1996. ‘Policies towards Central and Eastern Europe’, in Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds), pp. 353–87.
Serre, Françoise de la 1991. ‘The EC and Central and Eastern Europe’, in and (eds), The State of the European Community: Politics, Institutions and Debates in the Transition Years. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 303–12.Google Scholar
1996. ‘European Union Legal Studies in Crisis? Towards a New Dynamic’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16: 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interpretation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil 1995. Reflections on the Methodology of Comparative Studies, Paper Given at the European University Institute, SPS Department, Seminar on Comparative Political Institutions, 2 June.
1998. ‘The Use of Political Conditionality in the EU's Relations with Third Countries: How Effective?’ European Foreign Affairs Review 3: 253–74.Google Scholar
1999. The Making of EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Eastern Europe. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. ‘European Commercial Policy: A Leadership Role in the New Millennium?’, European Foreign Affairs Review 4: 439–62.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve 1996. ‘Positivism and Beyond’, in Smith, et al. (eds), pp. 11–46.
Smith, Steve 2001. ‘Social Constructivisms and European Studies’, in Christiansen, Jørgensen and Wiener (eds), pp. 189–98.
Smith, Steve and Baylis, John 1997. ‘Introduction’, in and (eds), The Globalisation of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
, and (eds) 1996. International Relations Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanish Government 1995. 1996 Intergovernmental Conference – Discussion Document, SN 1709/95.
Spanish Presidency 1995. Proposition de la Présidence: Arrangement Entre le Conseil, les États Membres et la Commission sur les Modalitér de Participation aux Travaux de l'OMC, SN 4697/1/95 REV 1. Brussels.
Spence, David 1993. ‘The Role of the National Civil Service in European Lobbying: The British case’, in Mazey and Richardson (eds), pp. 47–73.
Standing Committee of Experts on International Immigration, Refugee and Criminal Law 1995. Proposals for the Amendment of the Treaty on European Union at the IGC in 1996. Utrecht.
Standing Committee of Experts on International Immigration, Refugee and Criminal Law 1997. Draft Revision of the EU Treaties : Response on the Dublin II Outline and the Addendum of the Dutch Presidency. Utrecht.
Standing Committee of Experts on International Immigration, Refugee and Criminal Law, Statewatch, The Immigration Law Practitioners Association and The European Council of Refugees and Exiles 2002. ‘Joint Submission to Working Group X’, Utrecht and London, 14 November.
Starting Line Group 1994. The Starting Point: Proposal for Amending the European Community Treaty. Brussels.
Statewatch 1999. The Impact of the Amsterdam Treaty on the Third Pillar. London: draft.
, and 1996. ‘Policymaking, Comitology and the Balance of Power in the European Union’, International Review of Law and Economics 16: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steunenberg, B., Schmidtchen, D. and Koboldt, C. 1997. ‘Comitology and the Balance of Power in the European Union: A Game Theoretic Approach’, in and (eds), Constitutional Law and Economics of the European Union. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar, 37–66.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec and Caporaso, James A. 1998. ‘From Free Trade to Supranational Polity: The European Court and Integration,’ in Sandholtz and Stone Sweet (eds), pp. 92–133.
and 1997. ‘European Integration and Supranational Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 4: 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. ‘Der Vertrag von Nizza – eine kritische Analyse’, Zukunftsforum Politik – Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 21, February.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Peter 1997. ‘Has the IGC Succeeded?’, in European Policy Centre 1997b, pp. 29–30.
Taifel, Henri and Forgas, Joseph 1981. ‘Social Categorisation: Cognitions, Values and Groups’, in (ed.) 1981. Social Cognition. London: Academic Press, pp. 113–40.Google Scholar
2004. ‘The Power of the Presidecy: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42 pp. 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. ‘Bridging the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide in Political Science’, American Political Science Review 89: 471–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Paul 1989. ‘The New Dynamics of EC in the 1980s’, in (ed.), The European Community and the Challenge of the Future. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul 1990. ‘Functionalism: The Approach of David Mitrany’, in Groom, A. J. R. and Taylor, Paul (eds), Frameworks for International Co-operation. London: Pinter, pp. 125–38.
1990. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York: Farmer Press.Google Scholar
The Article 133 Information Group 2002. ‘Article 133 and the Nice Treaty’, 4 October, http://www.indymedia.ie/article133/ (last accessed on 03 July 2006).
Timmermans, Christiaan 1987. ‘Common Commercial Policy (Article 113 EEC) and International Trade in Services’, in , , and (eds), Du droit international au droit de l'intégration: Liber Amicorum Pierre Pescatore. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 675–89.Google Scholar
Timmermans, C. W. A. 1993. ‘Free Movement of Persons and the Division of Powers between the Community and Its Member States – Why do it the Intergovernmental Way?’, in Schermers et al. (eds), pp. 352–68.
1991. ‘Neo-functionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? A Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the EC’, Millenium 20: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trans European Policy Studies Association 1996. Revision of Maastricht: Implementation and Proposals for Reform: A Survey of National Views, Paper 6.
2001. ‘Is There any Social Constructivist – Institutionalist Divide? Unpacking Social Mechanisms Affecting Representational Roles among EU Decision-makers’, Journal of European Public Policy 8: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Beyond the EU Membership–Nonmembership Dichotomy? Supranational Identities among National EU Decision-makers’, Journal of European Public Policy 9: 468–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter’, American Political Science Review 88: 128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyszkiewicz, Zygmunt 1997. ‘Employment and Competitiveness’, in European Policy Centre 1997b, p. 52.
. 2001. ‘Managing Asylum and European Integration: Expanding Spheres of Exclusion?’, Policy and International Studies 2: 288–304.Google Scholar
UNICE 1997. ‘UNICE Message to the Amsterdam Summit’, Brussels, 6 June.
UNICE 2000a. ‘Preliminary UNICE Statement in View of the Intergovernmental Conference’, Brussels, 3 December.
UNICE 2000b. ‘UNICE Position on Extension of Qualified Majority Voting in the Context of the Intergovernmental Conference’, Brussels, 11 October, http://www.ciginfo.net/CIGinfo/en/igcdoc/default.htm (last accessed on 15 July 2004).
UNICE 2002. Convention on the Future of Europe, position on the EU Convention. Brussels, 17 June.
United Kingdom Government 1996a. A Partnership of Nations: A British Approach to the European Union Intergovernmental Conference 1996. London: HMSO.
United Kingdom Government 1996b. Third Pillar Objectives and Scope of Application, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, CONF 3918/96. Brussels.
United Nations 1995. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations and Competitiveness. New York: UNCTC.
and (eds) 1996. Challenges to the New World Trade Organisation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Van Outrive, Lode 1995. ‘Commentary on the Third Pillar and the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference: What should be on the Agenda?’, in Bieber and Monar (eds), pp. 391–6.
1996. ‘ “The Council Decides”: Does the Council Decide?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. ‘Courts and (Epistemic) Communities in the Convergence of Competition Policies’, Journal of European Public Policy 9: 913–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. ‘The Role of the Delors Committee in the Creation of EMU: An Epistemic Community?’, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 308–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitorino, Antonio 2001. ‘A la Conférence des Présidents des commissions compéntes en matière d'immigration des parlements de l'UE’, Sènate belge, Speech/01/608, Brussels, 4 December 2001.
2002. Renforcer l'espace der liberté, de sécurité et de justice, Intervention at the European Convention, Speech/02/261. Brussels, 6 June.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen 1983. ‘Negotiation, Conflict, and Compromise: The Elusive Pursuit of Common Policies’, in Wallace, H., Wallace, W., and Webb, C. (eds), pp. 43–80.
Wallace, Helen 1985a. ‘EC Membership and the Presidency: A Comparative Perspective’, in Nuallain (ed.), pp. 261–79.
1985b. Europe: The Challenge of Diversity, Chatham House Papers, No. 29. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul for the RIIA.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen 1986. ‘Bilateral, Trilateral and Multilateral Negotiations in the European Community’, in Morgan and Bray (eds).
Wallace, Helen 1990. ‘Making Multilateral Negotiations Work’, in Wallace, W. (ed.), pp. 213–28.
and (eds) 1996. Policy-Making in the European Union, third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (eds) 1983. Policy Making in the European Community, second edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Wallace, William 1990a. ‘Introduction: The Dynamics of European Integration’, in Wallace, W. (ed.), pp. 1–24.
Webb, Carole 1983. ‘Theoretical Perspectives and Problems’, in Wallace, H. et al. (eds), pp. 1–41.
Weber, Max 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences, New York: Free Press.
1981. ‘The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism’ Yearbook of European Law 1: 268–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph 1994. ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Area of Political Integration’, in and ,(eds) Economic and Political Integration in Europe, pp. 131–60.Google Scholar
1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang 1994. ‘The Third Pillar: Plea for a Single Theoretical Research Agenda’, in Monar and Morgan (ed.), pp. 227–36.
Wessels, Wolfgang 1996. ‘Institutions of the EU System: Models of explanation’, in Rometsch and Wessels (eds), pp. 20–36.
1997. ‘An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Processes’, Journal of Common Market Studies 35: 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘Keynote Article: The Constitutional Treaty – Three Readings from a Fusion Perspective’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review, 43: 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang and Rometsch, Dietrich 1996. ‘Conclusion: European Union and National Institutions’, in Rometsch and Wessels (eds), pp. 328–65.
Westlake, Martin 1994b. ‘The Commission and the Parliament’, in Edwards and Spence (eds), pp. 225–48.
Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas 2004. ‘Taking Stock of Integration Theory’, in Wiener and Diez (eds), pp. 235–48.
Wight, C. 2002. ‘Philosophy of Science and International Relations’, in , Risse, T., and Simmons, B. A. (eds) 2002. Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, pp. 23–51.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolcock, Stephen and Hodges, Michael 1996. ‘EU Policy in the Uruguay Round’, in Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds), pp. 301–24.
WTO 2004. ‘The Doha Work Programme – Text of the “July package” ’, (1 August), http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/draft_text_gc_dg_31july04_e.htm (last accessed on 03 July 2006).
1996. ‘The Role of the EU Presidency in the Environmental Field: Does it Make a Difference which Member State runs the Presidency?’, Journal of European Public Policy 3: 272–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Alasdair R. 2001. Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and the ‘New’ International Trade Agenda’, EUI Working Papers, RSC No. 2001/12.
2001. ‘Epistemic Communities, Collective Entrepreneurship and European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy 8: 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zypries, Brigitte 2003. ‘Der Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts in der Verfassung der Europäischen Union’, Lecture at the Humboldt University, Berlin, 27 May.