Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T01:27:20.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Priorities between different proposals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

Robbie Sabel
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv University
Get access

Summary

Order of voting on proposals

A study of records of international conferences reveals that more time is devoted to debating the order of voting on proposals and amendments than to any other single procedural issue. Delegations will attempt to achieve priority for their proposal as there are obvious advantages to the proposers if a proposal is voted on before an opposing one. This is particularly true when there are similarities between two different proposals and either one of them is likely to attract floating or neutral votes. In such a case, either proposal is likely to get a majority and once the one proposal is accepted, the other alternative is likely to fall. It is therefore often the order in which proposals are put to the vote that determines which proposal will be adopted.

The rules of procedure of the UNGA stipulate:

Voting on proposals

Rule 91

If two or more proposals relate to the same question, the General Assembly shall, unless it decides otherwise, vote on the proposals in the order in which they have been submitted. The General Assembly may, after each vote on a proposal, decide whether to vote on the next proposal.

The UN Model Rules propose:

Rule 60

Order of voting on proposals

1. If two or more proposals, other than amendments, relate to the same question, they shall, unless the Conference decides otherwise, be voted on in the order in which they were submitted. The Conference may, after each vote on a proposal, decide whether to vote on the next proposal. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Procedure at International Conferences
A Study of the Rules of Procedure at the UN and at Inter-governmental Conferences
, pp. 263 - 284
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×