References

Marisa Bortolussi; Peter Dixon

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511500107.010

Adams, D. The hitchhikers guide to the galaxy. London: Pan Books; 1979

Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. A.Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin. 1975; 82:21–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, N. H. Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press; 1981

Anderson, R. C. and Pichert, J.Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1978; 17:1–12CrossRef Google Scholar

Andringa, E.; Tan, E.; van Horssen, P.; and Jacobs, A. Effects of focalization in film narration. in: Totosy de Zepetnek, T. and Sywenky, I., editors. The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application. Edmonton: University of Alberta; 1997; pp. 203–15

Argueta, R. One day of life, Vintage International Edition, 1991, translated from original, Un Día en la Vida, San Salvador: UCA Editores; 1980

Aumonier, S. “Miss Bracegirdle does her duty.” in: Priestley, J. B., editor. Great British short stories. London: Reader's Digest Association; 1974; pp. 26–39

Baddeley, A. Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon; 1986

Bal, Mieke. The narrating and the focalizing: A theory of the agents in narrative. Style. 1983; 17(2):234–69Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Boheemen, C. van, translator. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1985

Bally, C.Le style indirect libre en français moderne. Germanisch-Romanisch Monatsschrift. 1912; 4(549–56):597–606Google Scholar

Banfield, A.Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language. 1973; 10:1–39Google Scholar

Banfield, A.Reflective and non-reflective consciousness in the language of fiction. Poetics Today. 1981; 2(2):61–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Banfield, A. Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet literary history. in: Lucy, J. A., editor. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993;(3):339–64

Barthes, R.Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récets. Communications. 1966: 8:1–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Barthes, R. Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits. Barthes, R.; Kayser, W.; Booth, W. C., and Hamon, P., editors. Poétique du récit. Paris: Edition du Seuil; 1977; pp. 7–57

Bartlett, F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1932

Bates, E. The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press; 1979

Bauer, W., et al. Text und Rezeption: Wirkungsanalyse Zeitgenössischer Lyrik am Beispiel des Gedichtes “Fadensonne” von Paul Celan. Frankfurt: Athenäum; 1972

Beach, R. A teacher's introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1993

Belli, G. The inhabited woman. March, K., translator. Willimantic, CT: Warner Books Edition; 1995

Black, J. B. and Wilensky, R.An evaluation of story grammars. Cognitive Science. 1979; 3:213–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Black, J. B.; Turner, T. J. and Bower, G. H.Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1979; 18:187–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Bleich, D. Subjective criticism. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 1978

Booth, W. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1961

Bordwell, D. Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1985

Borges, J. L. “Emma Zunz.” in: Borges, J. L. Labyrinths. New York: Modern Library; 1983; pp. 132–7

Bortolussi, M. and Dixon, P.The effects of formal training on literary reception. Poetics Today. 1996; 23:471–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Bortolussi, M. Science and the study of literature. Rusch, G., editor. Spiel: Siegener Periodicum Zur Internationalen Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. 1998; 16(1/2):67–70

Bortolussi, M. A psychonarratological revision of the theory of focalization. Language and Style. in press

Bower, G. H.Experiments on story understanding and recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1976; 28:511–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Bower, G. H.; Black, J. B.; and Turner, T. J.Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology. 1979; 11:177–220CrossRef Google Scholar

Bremond, Claude. La logique des possibles narratifs. Communications. 1966; 8:60–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Bremond, Claude. Logique du récit. Paris: Seuil, 1973

Bremond, ClaudeThe logic of narrative possibilities. New Literary History. 1980; 11:398–411CrossRef Google Scholar

Bremond, Claude. A critique of the motif. Todorov, T., editor. French literary theory today. Carter, R., translator. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982; pp. 124–46

Brodzki, B.She was unable not to think: Borges' “Emma Zunz” and the female subject. MLA. 1985; 100(2):330–47Google Scholar

Bronzwaer, W.Mieke Bal's concept of focalization: A critical note. Poetics Today. 1981; 2(2):193–201CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, N. R.Estimation strategies and the judgment of event frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995; 21:1539–53Google Scholar

Bruce, B.A social interaction model of reading. Discourse Processes. 1981; 4:273–311CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryant, D. J.; Tversky, B.; and Franklin, N.Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language. 1992; 31:74–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Burch, N. To the distant observer. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1979

Card, O. S. Ender's game. New York: Tom Doherty Associates; 1977

Carpenter, P. A. and Just, M. A., Integrative processes in comprehension. in: LaBerge, D. and Samuels, J., editors. Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977a

Carpenter, P. A. and Just, M. A. Reading comprehension as eyes see it. in: Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A., editors. Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977b

Carr, E. Klee Wyck. Toronto: Irwin Publishing; 1941

Carter, A. Nights at the circus. London: Vintage; 1994

Carter, A. Black Venus. London: Vintage; 1996

Cather, W. “Paul's Case.” in: Cather, Willa. Five stories. New York: Vintage Books; 1959; pp. 149–74

Cela, J. C. The Family of Pascual Duarte. Kerrigan, A., translator. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1964

Chafe, W. L. Discourse structure and human knowledge. in: Freedle, W. O. and Carroll, J. B., editors. Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, DC: Winston & Sons; 1972

Chafe, W. L. Some things that narratives tell us about the mind. in: Britton, B. K. and Pellegrini, A. D., editors. Narrative thought and narrative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990; pp. 79–98

Chang, F.Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronomial reference. Memory and Cognition. 1980; 8:58–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Chatman, S.On the formalist–structuralist theory of character. Journal of Literary Semantics. 1972; 1:57–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Chatman, S. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1978

Chatman, S.Characters and narrators: Filter, center, slant, and interest-focus. Poetics Today. 1986; 7(2):189–204CrossRef Google Scholar

Chatman, S. Coming to terms. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990

Chatman, S.How loose can narrators get? (And how vulnerable can narratees be?). Narrative. 1995; 3(3):3Google Scholar

Cherryh, C. J. Cyteen: The betrayal. New York: Popular Library; 1988

Cherryh, C. J. Fortress of owls. New York: Harpe Prism; 1999

Chomsky, N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton; 1957

Chomsky, N.Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language. 1959; 35:26–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1965

Clark, H. H.The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1973; 12:335–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996

Clark, H. H. and Carlson, T. B.Hearers and speech acts. Language. 1982; 58:332–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. and Chase, W. G.On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology. 1972; 3:472–517CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J.On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1984; 113:121–6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J.Quotations as demonstrations. Language. 1990; 66:764–805CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. and Schaefer, E. F.Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science. 1989; 13:259–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H.; Cohen, J.;Smith, J. E. K.; and Keppel, G.Discussion of Wike and Church's comments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1976; 15:257–66Google Scholar

Cohen, J.The Earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist. 1994; 49:997–1003CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohn, D. Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. 1978: Princeton: Princeton University Press

Corcoran, M. G.Language, character, and gender in the direct discourse of Dubliners. Style. 1991; 25(3):439–53Google Scholar

Coste, D. Narrative as communication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota; 1989

Coulmas, F. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyère; 1986

Craig, C. “In the hills.” in: Mordecai, P. and Wilson, B., editors. Her true-true name: An anthology of women's writing from the Caribbean. Oxford: Heinemann; 1990; pp. 56–9

Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R. S.Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior. 1972; 11:671–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Craik, F. I. M. and Watkins, M. J.The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1973; 12:599–607CrossRef Google Scholar

Culler, J. Defining narrative units. in: Fowler, R., editor. Style and structure in literature: Essays in the new stylistics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1975a

Culler, J. Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics, and the study of literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1975b

Cupchik, G. C. Identification as a basic problem for aesthetic reception. in: Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. and Sywenky, I., editors. The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press; 1997; pp. 11–22

Cupchik, G. C.; Oatley, K.; and Vorderer, L.Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics. 1998; 25:363–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Danov, D.Dialogic structures in Crime and Punishment. Russian, Croatian and Serbian, Czech and Slovak, Polish Literature. 1986; 19(3):291–314Google Scholar

Deighton, L. Berlin game. London: Grafton Books; 1984

de Man, P. Blindness and insight: Essays in the rhetoric of comparative criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press; 1983

Dillon, G. Language processing and the reading of literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1978

Dingwall, W. The species-specificity of speech. in: Dato, D. P., editor. Developmental psycholinguistics: Theory and applications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1975

Dixon, P.Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998; 5:390–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Dixon, P. and Bortolussi, M.Literary communication: Effects of reader-narrator co-operation. Poetics. 1996a; 23(6):405–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Dixon, P. The narrator in the text and the narrator in the reader. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature. 1996b; Nakoda Lodge, Alberta, Canada

Dixon, P. I metodi della psiconarratologia. in: Nemesio, A., editor. L'esperienza del testo. Rome: Meltemi Editori; 1999c; pp. 126–43

Dixon, P. Narratorial relevance and character goals. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature. 2000; Toronto

Dixon, P.Text is not communication: A challenge to a common assumption. Discourse Processes. 2001a; 31(1):1–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Dixon, P. Prolegomena for a science of psychonarratology. in: W. van Peer and S. Chatman, editors. New perspectives on narrative perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York; 2001b; pp. 275–88

Dixon, P. and O'Reilly, T.Scientific versus statistical inference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1999; 53:133–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Dixon, P.; Bortolussi, M.; Twilley, L. C.; and Leung, A.Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations. Poetics. 1993; 22:5–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Doležel, L. Possible worlds and literary fictions. in: Allén, S., editor. Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 1989; pp. 221–42

Dorfman, M. H.Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers. Poetics. 1996; 23:453–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Dressler, W. U.The cognitive perspective of ‘naturalist’ linguistic models. Cognitive Linguistics. 1990; 1:75–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Duchan, J. F.; Bruder, G. A.; and Hewitt, L. E. Deixis in Narrative. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995

Ebert, T. L. The romance of patriarchy: Ideology, subjectivity, and postmodern feminist cultural theory. Cultural Critique. 1988; 10

Eco, U. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1979

Edmiston, W. F.Focalization and the first-person narrator: A revision of the theory. Poetics Today. 1989; 10(4):729–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, A. W. F. Likelihood. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univeristy; 1992

Einstein, G. O.; McDaniel, M. A.; Owen, P. D.; and Coté, N. C.Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 1990; 29:566–582CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellison, R. Invisible man. New York: Random House; 1952

Emberson, J.Reported speech in medieval German narrative. Paregon: Bulletin of the Australian and New Zealand Association for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. 1986; 4:103–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Emmott, C. Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997

Ericsson, K. A. and Kintsch, W.Long term working memory. Psychological Review. 1995; 102:211–45CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Erlich, S. Point of view: A linguistic analysis of literary style. London & New York: Routledge; 1990

Faulkner, W. Honor. Collected stories of William Faulkner. New York: Random House; 1950; pp. 551–64

Faulkner, W. Honor. A rose for Emily. Selected short stories of William Faulkner. New York: The Modern Library; 1961; pp. 49–61

Fetterley, J. The resisting reader: A feminist aproach to American fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1977

Findley, T. Not Wanted on the Voyage. Toronto: Penguin Books; 1984

Fisch, H.Character as linguistic sign. New Literary History. 1990; 21:593–606CrossRef

Fish, S.Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. New Literary History. 1970; 2:123–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Fish, S. Is there a text in this class: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1980

Fish, S.Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. Profession. 1989; 89:15–22Google Scholar

Fishelov, D.Types of characters, characteristics of types. Style. 1990; 3:422–39Google Scholar

Fishelov, D. Metaphors of genre: The role of analogies in genre theory. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University; 1993

Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd; 1925

Fisher, R. A.Statistical methods and scientific induction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 1955; 17:69–78Google Scholar

Flaubert, G. Madame Bovary: A story of provincial life. Russell, A., translator. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1950

Fletcher, C. R.Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 1986; 25:43–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Fletcher, C. R. and Bloom, C. P.Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language. 1988; 27:235–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. The fictions of language and the languages of fiction: The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge; 1993

Fludernik, M. Towards a “natural” narratology. London: Routledge; 1996

Forster, E. M. Aspects of the novel. London: Edward Arnold; 1974

Fort, B. Manon's suppressed voice: The uses of reported speech. Romanic Review. 1985; 76(2):172–91

Fowler, A. Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982

Franklin, N. and Tversky, B.Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1990; 119:63–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Franklin, N.; Tversky, B.; and Coon, V.Switching points of view in spatial mental models. Memory & Cognition. 1992; 20:507–18CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frazier, L. and Rayner, K.Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology. 1982; 14:178–210CrossRef Google Scholar

Frow, J.Spectacle binding: On character. Poetics Today. 1986; 7(2):227–50CrossRef Google Scholar

García, C. Dreaming in Cuban, New York: Ballantine Books; 1992

Genette, G. Figures III. Paris: Editions du Seuil; 1973

Genette, G. Narrative discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1980

Genette, G. Narrative discourse: An essay in method. McDowell, R. S. and Velie, A., translators. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1983

Gergen, K. J.Textual considerations in the scientific construction of human character. Style. 1990; 24(3):17–31Google Scholar

Gerrig, R. J. Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1993

Gerrig, R. J. and Allbritton, D. W.The construction of literary character: A view from cognitive psychology. Style. 1990; 24:380–91Google Scholar

Gerrig, R. J.; Brennan, S. E.; and Ohaeri, J. O.What can we conclude from speakers behaving badly?Discourse Processes. 2000; 29:173–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerrig, R. J.; Ohaeri, J. O; and Brennan, S. E.Illusory transparency revisited. Discourse processes. 2000; 29:137–159CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R.Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1990; 16:56–66Google Scholar PubMed

Gibbs, R. Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999

Gibson, W. All tomorrow's parties. New York: Ace Books; 1999

Glanzer, M.; Fischer, B.; and Dorfman, D.Short-term storage in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1984; 23:467–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenn, C. G.The rules of episodic structure and of story length in children's recall of simple stories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1978; 17:229–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M.What memory is for. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 1997; 20:1–55Google Scholar PubMed

Glenberg, A. M. and Robertson, D. A.Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes. 1999; 28:1–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M.; Robertson, D. A.; and Members of the Honors Seminar in Cognitive Psychology. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language. 2000; 43:379–401CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M.; Meyer, M.; and Lindem, K.Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 1987; 26:69–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodman, S. N. and Royall, R.Evidence and scientific research. American Journal of Public Health. 1988; 78:1568–74CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Graesser, A. C.; Bowers, C.; Olde, B.; and Pomeroy, V.Who said what? Source memory for narrator and character agents in literary short stories. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999; 91:284–300CrossRef Google Scholar

Graesser, A. C.; Bowers, C. A.; Olde, B.; White, K.; and Person, N. K.Who knows what? Propagation of knowledge among agents in a literary storyworld. Poetics. 1999; 26:143–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Graesser, A. C.; Singer, M.; and Trabasso, T.Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review. 1994; 101:371–95CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Graves, B. and Frederiksen, C. H.Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics. 1991; 20:1–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Greimas, A. J.Narrative grammars: Units and levels. MLN, 1971; 86:793-806CrossRef Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. Logic and conversation. in: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L., editors. Syntax and semantics: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press; 1975; pp. 41–58

Gross, J. B.A telling side of narration: Direct discourse and French women writers. The French Review. 1993; 66(3):401–11Google Scholar

Gross, S.Cognitive readings; or, the disappearance of Literature in the Mind. Poetics Today. 1997; 18(2):271–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Hakala, C.Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model. Discourse Processes. 1999; 27:261–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. Cohesion in English. New York: Longman; 1976

Hamon, P. Pour un statut sémiologique du personnage. Littérature, 1972; 6:86–110CrossRef

Hamon, P. Pour un statut sémiologique du personnage. in: Barthes, R.; Kayser, W.; Booth, W. C.; and Hamon, P., editors. Poétique du récit. Paris: Editions du Seuil; 1977; pp. 115–80

Hartley, J.Invisible fictions: Television audiences, paedocracy, pleasure. Textual Practice. 1987; 1(2):121–138CrossRef Google Scholar

Harvey, W. J. Character and the novel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1965

Hauptmeier, H.; Meutsch, D.; and Viehoff, P.Empirical research on understanding literature. Poetics Today. 1989; 10(3):563–604CrossRef Google Scholar

Haviland, S. E. and Clark, H. H.What's new? Acquiring new information in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1974; 13:512–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayes, J. R. and Flower, L. S.Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist. 1986; 41:1106–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayes, J. R.; Schriver, K. A.; Spilka, R; and Blaustein, A. If it's clear to me it must be clear to them. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication; New Orleans, LA; 1986

Hemingway, E. The snows of Kilimanjaro. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons; 1927

Hirsch, E. D. The aims of interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1976

Hochman, B. Character in literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1985

Holland, N. 5 readers reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1975

Holland, N. Recovering “The Purloined Letter”: Reading as a personal transaction. in: Saleiman, S. R. and Crossman, I., editors. The reader in the text: Essays on audience and interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1980; pp. 350–70

Holland, N. Fantasy and defense in Faulkner's “A rose for Emily.” in: Staton, S., editor. Literary theories in praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1987; pp. 294–307

Holub, R. C. Reception theory: A critical introduction. London: Routledge; 1989

Irving, W. “The adventure of the German student.” in: Litz, A. W., editor. Major American short stories, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994; pp. 38–43

Iser, W. The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1974

Iser, W. The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1978

Iser, W. Interaction between text and reader. in: Suleiman, S. R. and Crossman, I., editors. The reader in the text: Essays on audience and interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1980; pp. 10–19

Jahn, M.Frames, preferences, and the reading of third-person narratives: Towards a cognitive narratology. Poetics Today. 1997; 18(4):441–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R.Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New Literary History. 1970; 2(1):7–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R.Levels of identification of hero and audience. New Literary History. 1974; 5(2):283–312CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1983

Johnson, N. S. and Mandler, J. M.A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in stories. Poetics. 1980; 9:51–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, E. E. and Davis, K. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. in: Berkowitz, L., editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1965; pp. 219–66

Jost, F.Narration(s): En decà et au-delà. Communications. 1983; 38:192–212CrossRef Google Scholar

Joyce, J. Dubliners. New York: Penguin Books; 1991

Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1987

Kamau, K. A. Flickering shadows. New York: Henry Holt and Company; 1996

Kaschak, M. P. and Glenberg, A. M.Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2000; 43:508–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H.Attribution in social psychology: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 1967; 15:192–238

Kenny, D. A.A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review. 1991; 98:155–63CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Keysar, B.The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking text. Cognitive Psychology. 1994; 26:165–208CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kincaid, J. Marbles. in: Mordecai, P. and Wilson, B., editors. Her true-true name: An anthology of women's writing from the Caribbean. Oxford: Heinemann; 1990; pp. 112–16

Kintsch, W. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1974

Kintsch, W. and Greene, E.The role of culture-specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories. Discourse Processes. 1978; 1:1–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Kintsch, W.;Kozminsky, E.; Streby, W. J.; McKoon, F.; and Keenan, J. M.Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1975; 14:196–214CrossRef Google Scholar

Knapp, J. V.Family systems as psychotherapy, literary character, and literature: An introduction. Style. 1997; 31(2):223–54Google Scholar

Knapp, J. V.Introduction: Self-preservation and self-transformation: Interdisciplinary approaches to literary character. Style. 1990; 24(3):349–64Google Scholar

Krieger, M. Arts on the level: The fall of the elite object. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press; 1981

Kushigian, J. La economía de las palabras: Disipador del miedo inefable en Borges y Silvina Bullrich. Inti: Revista de Literatura Hispánica. 1989 Spring–1989 Fall; 29–30:207–214

Labov, W. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 1972; pp. 354–96

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books; 1999

Lamarque, P. Narrative and Invention: The Limits of Fictionality. in: Nash, C., editor. Narrative in culture: The uses of storytelling in the sciences, philosophy, and literature. London: University of Warwick Centre for Research in Philosophy and Literature; 1990; pp. 131–53

Lanser, S. The narrative act: Point of view in fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1981

Lanser, S.Sexing the narrative: Propriety, desire, and the engendering of narratology. Narrative. 1995; 3(1):85–94Google Scholar

Lardner, R. The love nest and other stories. New York: C. Scribner's Sons; 1926

Larsen, S. F. and Seilman, U.Personal remindings while reading literature. Text. 1988; 8:411–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Larsen, S. F. and Viehoff, R. Introduction: “Empirical” – What does it mean in IGEL studies? in: Rusch, G., editor. Emprical approaches to literature: Procedings of the fourth conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature – IGEL; Budapest. Siegen: Lumis Publications; 1995:21–27

Larsen, S. F.; László, J.; and Seilman, U. Across time and place: Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. in: Ibsch, E.; Schram, D.; and Steen, G., editors. Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL Conference, Amsterdam, 1989. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 1991

le Carré, J. The naive and sentimental lover. London: Pan Books; 1972

le Carré, J. Smiley's people. London: Penguin Books; 1992

le Carré, J. Our game. Toronto: Penguin Books; 1995

le Carré, J. The tailor of Panama. Toronto: Penguin; 1997

Le Guin, U. K. “The wife's story.” in: The Compass Rose. New York: Bantam Books; 1983

Le Guin, U. K. Always coming home. Toronto: Bantam Books; 1985

Le Guin, U. K. Tehanu: The last book of Earthsea. New York: Atheneum; 1990

Lehnert, W. G. Plot units: A narrative summarization strategy. in: Lehnert, W. G. and Ringle, M. H., editors. Strategies for natural language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1982; pp. 375–412

Lenneberg, E. The biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley; 1967

Levelt, W. J. M. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989

Levelt, W. J. M. Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions. in: Bloom, M. A.; Peterson, N. L.; and Garret, M. F. Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996; pp. 77–108

Levine, W. H. and Klin, C. M.Tracking of spatial components of situation models. Memory & Cognition. 2001; 29:327–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Limon, J. The place of fiction in the time of science: A disciplinary history of American writing. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990

Linde, C. and Labov, W.Spatial netwoks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language. 1975; 51:924–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Loftus, G. R.A picture is worth a thousand p values: On the irrelevance of hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 1993; 25:250–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Long, D. L. and Ley, L.Implicit causality and discourse focus: The interaction of text and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory and Language. 2000; 42:545–70CrossRef Google Scholar

López, I. H. … And there is only my imagination where our history should be: An interview with Cristina García. Michigan Quarterly Review. 1994; 33:3Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon; 1980

Magliano, J. P.; Dijkstra, K.; and Zwann, R. A.Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes. 1996; 22:199-224CrossRef Google Scholar

Makaryk, I. R., editor and compiler. Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: Approaches, scholars, terms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1993

Mandler, J. M.A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes. 1978; 1:14–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M. Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984

Mandler, J. M. and Goodman, M. S.On the psychological reality of story structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1982; 21:507–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolin, U.Characterization in narrative: Some theoretical prolegomena. Neophilologus. 1983; 67:1–14CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolin, U.The doer and the deed: Action as basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today. 1986; 7(2):205–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolin, U.Structuralist approaches to character in narrative: The state of the art. Semiotica. 1989; 75(1/2):1–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolin, U.Individuals in narrative worlds: An ontological perspective. Poetics Today. 1990a; 11(4):843–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolin, U.The what, the when, and the how of being a character in literary narrative. Style. 1990b; 24(3):453–68Google Scholar

Margolin, U. Fictional individuals and their counterparts. Andrew, J., editor. Studies in Slavic Literature and Poetics. 1992; 1743–56

Margolin, U.Changing individuals in narrative: Science, philosophy, literature. Semiotica. 1995; 107(12):5–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Margolin, U.Characters in literary narrative: Representation and signification. Semiotica. 1998; 106(3/4):373–92Google Scholar

McCutchen, D. and Perfetti, C. A.The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1982; 2:672–87CrossRef Google Scholar

McDaniel, M. A.; Hines, R. J.; Waddil, P. J.; and Einstein, G. O.What makes folk tales unique: Content familiarity, causal structure, scripts, or superstructures?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994; 20:169–84Google Scholar PubMed

McHale, B.Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature. 1978; 3:249–87Google Scholar

McHale, B.Unspeakable sentences, unnatural acts: Linguistics and poetics revisited. Poetics Today. 1983; 4(1):17–45CrossRef Google Scholar

McKoon, G. and Ratcliff, R.Inference during reading. Psychological Review. 1992; 99:440–66CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McRobbie, A. Feminism and youth culture. Cambridge, MA: Hyman; 1990

Medin, D. L. and Schaffer, M. M.Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review. 1978; 85:207–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Meyer, B. J. F. The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1975

Miall, D. S. and Kuiken, D.Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English. 1995; 29:37–58Google Scholar

Moore, R. E. Performance form and the voices of characters in five versions of the Wasco Coyote cycle. in: Lucy, J. A., editor. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993

Morrison, T. Beloved. New York: Plume, Penguin Putnam; 1998

Morrow, D. G.; Bower, G. H.; and Greenspan, S. L.Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 1989; 28:292–312CrossRef Google Scholar

Morrow, D. G.; Greenspan, S. L.; and Bower, G. H., Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 1987(26):165–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Mukarovsky, J. Aesthetic function, norm and value as social facts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1970

Munro, A. The office. in: Munro, A., editor. Collected short stories. New York: Random House; 1996; pp. 59–74

Murillo, L. A. The Cyclical Night: Irony in James Joyce and Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1968

Myers, J. L. and O'Brien, E. J.Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes. 1998; 26:131–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Nash, C. Narrative in culture. London: Routledge; 1994

Nelles, W.Getting focalization into focus. Poetics Today. 1990; 11(2):365–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1972

Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Biometrika. 1928; 20A:263–94

Nosofsky, R. M.Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1991; 17:3–27Google Scholar PubMed

Oatley, K.A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics. 1994; 23:53–74CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Brien, E. J. and Albrecht, J. E.Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1992; 18:777–84Google Scholar PubMed

O'Brien, E. J.; Lorch, R. F. Jr.; and Myers, J. L.Memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes. 1998; 26:2–3Google Scholar

Olson, G. M.; Mack, R. L., and Duffy, S. A.Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics. 1981; 10:283–315CrossRef Google Scholar

Oltean, S.Functions of free indirect discourse: The case of a novel. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique. 1986; 31:153–64Google Scholar

Oltean, S.A survey of the pragmatic and referential functions of free indirect discourse. Poetics Today. 1993; 14(4):691–714CrossRef Google Scholar

Omanson, R. C.An analysis of narratives: Identifying central, supportive, and distracting content. Discourse Processing. 1982; 5:195–224CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Neill, P. Points of origin: On focalization in narrative. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature. 1992; Sept:331–50

O'Neill, P. Fictions of discourse: Reading narrative theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1994

Ortega, R. P.Intento de interpretación psicoanalítica de un cuento de Jorge Luis Borges. Eco. 1971; 23(138–139):587–99Google Scholar

Pavel, T. G. Fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986

Phelan, J. Reading people, reading plots: Character, progression, and the interpretation of narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1989

Pinker, S. The language instinct. New York: Morrow; 1994

Piwowarczyk, M. A.The narratee and the situation of enunciation: A reconsideration of Prince's theory. Genre. 1976; 9:161–77Google Scholar

Polanyi, L. Literary complexity in everyday storytelling. in: Tannen, D., editor. Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1982

Pollard-Gott, L.Attribution theory and the novel. Poetics. 1993; 21:499–524CrossRef Google Scholar

Porter, K. A. Rope. in: Cahill, S., editor. Women and fiction: Short stories by and about women. New York: New American Library; 1975; pp. 78–84

Postman, L. and Senders, V. L.Incidental learning and generality of set. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1946; 36:153–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage; 1987

Prince, G. A grammar of stories. The Hague: Mouton; 1973

Prince, G. Dictionary of narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1987

Prince, G. Narratology: The form and functioning of narrative. Amsterdam: Mouton; 1982

Prince, G. On narratology: Past, present, future. French Literary Studies. 1990; XVII

Propp, V. Morphologie du conte. Derrida, M.; Todorov, T.; and Kahn, C., translators. Paris: Editions du Seuil; 1965

Propp, V. Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas; 1968

Raap, D. N.; Gerrig, R. J.; and Prentice, D. A.Readers' trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2001;45:737–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, P. J. Other reader-oriented theories. in: Selden, R., editor. The Cambridge history of literary criticism: From formalism to poststructuralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995; 375–403

Ramazani, V. The free indirect mode: Flaubert and the poetics of irony. Charlottesville: Univeristy Press of Virginia; 1988

Reeder, G. D. and Brewer, M. B.A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review. 1979; 86:61–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Richard, J.-P. Littérature et sensation. Paris: Aux Editions du Seuil; 1954

Richards, E. and Singer, M.Representation of complex goal structures in narrative comprehension. Discourse Processes. 2001; 31:111–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Richardson, B.Beyond poststructuralism: Theory of character, the personae of modern drama, and the antinomies of critical theory. Modern Drama. 1997; 40:86–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. Temps et récit. Paris: Seuil; 1983

Riffaterre, M.Describing poetic structures: Two approaches to Baudelaire's “Les Chats.”Yale French Studies. 1966; 36/37:200–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Rimmon-Kenan, S. Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. New York: Methuen; 1983

Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B.Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology. 1975; 7:573–605CrossRef Google Scholar

Ross, L. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. in: Berkowitz, L., editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1977; pp. 173–220

Ross, L. D.; Amabile, T. M.; and Steinmetz, J. L.Social roles, social cognition, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1977; 35:485–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the goblet of fire. London: Raincoast Books; 2000

Rumelhart, D. E. Notes on a schema for stories. in: Bobrow, D. G. and Collins, A., editors. Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press; 1975; pp. 211–36

Rusch, G. The notion of “empirical”: Knowing how. in: Rusch, G., editor. Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature – IGEL; Budapest. Siegen: Lumis Publications; 1995: pp. 103–8

Sanders, J. and Redeker, G. Perspective and the representation of speech and thought. in: Fauconnier, G., editor. Worlds and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996; pp. 290–317

Sanford, A. J. and Garrod, S. Understanding written language: Explorations in comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester: Wiley; 1981

Sanford, A. J. and Garrod, S. C.The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes. 1998; 26:159–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977

Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G.; and Sacks, H.The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language. 1977; 53:361–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. J.Receptional problems with contemporary narrative texts and some of their reasons. Poetics. 1980; 9:119–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. J.Empirical studies in literature: Introductory remarks. Poetics. 1981; 10:317–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. J.The empirical science of literature ESL: A new paradigm. Poetics. 1983; 12:19–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. J. What can “empirical” mean in a constructivist context? 10 considerations. in: Rusch, G., editor. Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature – IGEL; Budapest. Siegen: Lumis Publications; 1995: 109–112

Schober, M. F.Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition. 1993; 47:1–24CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J. L.A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 1989; 96:523–68CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Selden, R. The Cambridge history of literary criticism: From formalism to poststructuralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1995

Shapiro, M.How narrators report speech. Language and Style. 1984; 17(1):67–78Google Scholar

Shaw, H. E.Thin description: A reply to Seymour Chatman. Narrative. 1995; 3(3):307–14Google Scholar

Shepard, L. Life during wartime. New York: Bantam Books; 1987

Shklovsky, V. Art as technique. in: Lemon, L. T. and Reis, M. J., editors. Russian formalist criticism: Four essays. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1965; pp. 3–24

Sidner, C.Focusing and discourse. Discourse Processes. 1983; 6:107–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Sinclair-de Zwart, H. Language acquisition and cognitive development. in: Moore, T., editor. Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press; 1973

Singer, M. and Ferreira, F.Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1983; 22:437–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Slatoff, W. With respect to readers: Dimensions of literary response. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1970

Sophocles. Oedipus the king and Antigone. Arnott, P. D., translator. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1969

Spilich, G. J.; Vesonder, G. T.; Chiesi, H. L.; and Voss, J. F.Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1979; 18:275–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Spolsky, E. Gaps in nature: Literary interpretation and the modular mind. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1993

Stampfl, B.Filtering Rimmon-Kenan, Chatman, Black, Freud, and James: Focalization and the divided self in “The beast in the jungle.”Style. 1992; 26(3):388–99Google Scholar

Stanzel, F. K. Teller-characters and reflector-characters in narrative theory. Poetics Today. 1981; 2(2):4–15CrossRef

Stein, N. L. and Glenn, C. G. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. in: Le Freed, R., editor. New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2). Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1979; pp. 53–120

Suleiman, S. and Crosman, I. The reader in the text: Essays on audience and interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1980

Symonds, J. A., On the application of evolutionary principles to art and literature. in: Essays speculative and suggestive. New York: AMS Press; 1970; pp. 197–224

Tan, E. S. H.Film-induced affect as a witness emotion. Poetics. 1994; 23:7–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Tannen, D.Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language. 1982; 58(1):1–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Tannen, D. Conversational style. Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood: Ablex; 1984

Taylor, H. A. and Tversky, B.Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language. 1996; 35:371–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Thorndyke, P. W.Cognitive structure in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology. 1977; 9:51–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Thury, E. M. and Friedlander, A. The impact of expertise: The role of experience in reading literary texts. in: Rusch, G., editor. Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature – IGEL; Budapest. Siegen: Lumis Publications; 1995; p. 22

Tolliver, J. Discourse analysis and the interpretation of literary narrative. Style. 1990; 24(2):266–83

Tomachevsky, B. Thématique. in: Todorov, T., editor and translator. Théorie de la littérature. Paris: Aux Editions du Seuil; 1965

Toolan, M. J. Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. New York: Routledge; 1995

Trabasso, R. and Sperry, L. L.Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language. 1985; 24:595–611CrossRef Google Scholar

Trabasso, T. and Broek, P.Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language. 1985; 24:612–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Trope, Y. and Burnstein, E.Processing the information contained in another's behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1975; 11:439–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, M. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1991

Tversky, B. Spatial perspective in descriptions. in: Bloom, P.; Barret, M.; Hadel, L.; and Peterson, M., editors. Language and Space. Boston: MIT Press; 1996; pp. 463–91

Uleman, J. S.; Hon, A.;Roman, R. J.; and Moskowitz, G. B.On-line evidence for spontaneous trait inferences at encoding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996; 22:377–94CrossRef Google Scholar

van den Broek, P.; Risden, K.; Fletcher, C. R.; and Thurlow, R. A. “Landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. in: Britton, B. K. and Graesser, A. C., editors. Models of understanding text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1996; pp. 165–87

Dijk, T. A.Philosophy of action and theory of narrative. Poetics. 1976; 5Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press; 1983

Vipond, D. and Hunt, R. A. Literary processing and response as transactions: Evidence for the contribution of readers, texts, and situation. in: Meutsch, D. and Viehoff, R., editors. Comprehension of literary discourse: Interdisciplinary approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1989; pp. 155–74

Vitoux, P.Le jeu de la focalisation. Poétique. 1982; 51:359–68Google Scholar

Vitoux, P.Notes sur la focalisation dans le roman autobiographique. Etudes Littéraires. 1984; 17(2):261–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Walsh, R.Who is the narrator?Poetics Today. 1997a; 18(4):495–513CrossRef Google Scholar

Walsh, R.Why we wept for Little Nell: Character and emotional involvment. Narrative. 1997b; 5(3):306–21Google Scholar

Warren, W. H.; Nicholas, D. W.; and Trabasso, T. Event chains and inferences in understanding narratives. in: Freedle, R. O., editor. Advances in discourse processes: New directions in discourse processing, Vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1979

Weinberg, H. H.Irony and “style indirect libre” in Madame Bovary. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature. 1981; 8(1):1–9Google Scholar

Weitz, M.The role of theory in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1956; 15(1):27–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Weitz, M. The opening mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977

Wellek, R. The concept of evolution in literary history. in: Wellek, R., editor. Concepts of criticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1973

Werth, P. N. How to build a world (in a lot less than six days, and using only what's in your head). in: Green, K., editor. New essays in deixis: Discourse, narrative, literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 1995; pp. 49–80

White, H. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. in: Mitchell, W. J. T., editor. On narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1981; pp. 1–24

Whitehurst, G. Language development. in: Wolman, B., editor. Handbook of developmental psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1982

Wiebe, J. M. Recognizing subjective sentences: A computational analysis of narrative text. Buffalo, NY: SUNY, Department of Computer Science; 1990

Wieder, L. Telling the code. in: Turner, R., editor. Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin; 1974

Wike, E. L. and Church, J. D.Comments on Clark's “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1976; 15:249–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilder, D.Perceiving persons as a group: Effects on attributions of causality and beliefs. Social Psychology. 1978; 1:13–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, S. G.; Rinck, M.; McNamara, T. P.; Bower, G. H.; and Morrow, D. G.Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications. Journal of Memory and Language. 1993; 32:141–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Winograd, T. A framework for understanding discourse. in: Just, M. A. and Carp, P. A. Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977; pp. 63–88

Wolff, E.Der intendierte Leser: Uberlegungen und Beispiele zur Einfuhrung eines literaturwissenschaftlichen Begriffes. Poetica. 1971; 4(2):141–66Google Scholar

Zwann, R.Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994; 20:920–33Google Scholar

Zwann, R. A.; Langston, M. C.; and Graesser, A. C.The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science. 1995; 6:292–7CrossRef Google Scholar