Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T22:00:11.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2009

Samuel Hollander
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Economics of Karl Marx
Analysis and Application
, pp. 501 - 518
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Paris Notebooks. Comments on James Mill, Élémens d'économie politique. 1844. MECW 3: 211–28.
Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts. 1844. MECW 3: 229–346.
Correspondence. 1844–83. MECW 38–46.
Draft of an Article on Friedrich List's Book Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie. 1845. MECW 4: 265–93.
The Poverty of Philosophy. An Answer to the “Philosophy of Poverty” by M. Proudhon. 1847. MECW 6: 105–212.
Wages. 1847. MECW 6: 415–37.
Speech on the Question of Free Trade, Brussels. 1848. MECW 6: 450–65.
Wage Labour and Capital. 1849. MECW 9: 197–228.
The Class Struggles in France, 1848 to 1850. 1850. MECW 10: 45–145.
The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 1852. MECW 11: 99–197.
The French Crédit Mobilier. 1856. MECW 15: 8–24.
Project for the Regulation of the Price of Bread in France. 1858. MECW 16: 110–14.
Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy. (Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie.) 1857–58. MECW 28; 29: 5–251.
A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Part Ⅰ). 1859. MECW 29: 257–417.
Economic Manuscripts. 1861–63. MECW 30–34. Includes “Theories of Surplus Value.” 30: 348–51; 31; 32; 33: 7–371.
Inaugural Address of the Working Men's International Association. 1864. MECW 20: 5–13.
On Proudhon [Open Letter]. 1865. MECW 20: 26–33.
Value, Price and Profit. 1865. MECW 20: 101–49.
Instructions for the Delegates of the Provisional General Council of the International Working Men's Association [Geneva Congress]. 1866. MECW 20: 185–94.
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy 1. 1867. MECW 35.
First Draft of The Civil War in France. 1871. (April-May.) MECW 22: 437–514.
The Civil War in France. Address of the General Council of the International Working Men's Association. 3rd ed. 1871. MECW 22: 307–59.
Interview with The World Correspondent. 1871. MECW 22: 600–6.
Speech on Trade Unions. From minutes of the session of the London Conference of the International Working Men's Association. 1871. MECW 22: 614–15.
Political Indifferentism. 1873. MECW 23: 392–7.
Letter to Wilhelm Bracke, March 18–28, regarding “Critique of the Gotha Programme.” 1875. MECW 24: 77–9.
Critique of the Gotha Programme. Marginal notes on the unity programme of the German Workers' Party. 1875. MECW 24: 81–99.
Preamble to the Programme of the French Workers' Party. 1880. MECW 24: 340–1.
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy 2. 1885. F. Engels ed. MECW 36.
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy 3. 1894. F. Engels ed. MECW 37.
Manuscrits Parisiens Ⅰ. Notes de lecture. 1844. Marx 1968: 7–43.
Manuscrits Parisiens Ⅱ. Ébauche d'une critique de l'économie politique. 1844: Marx 1968: 44–141.
Capital 1. 1965. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Capital 1. 1976. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin (cited as Marx 1976).
Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. 1973 (1857–58). Translated with a Foreward by Martin Nicolaus. New York: Vintage Books; Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
The Letters of Karl Marx. 1979. Padover, S. K., ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
The Holy Family or Critique of Critical Criticism Against Bruno Bauer and Company. 1845. MECW 4: 4–211.
The German Ideology. Critique of Modern German Philosophy According to its Representatives Feuerbach, B. Bauer and Stirner, and of German Socialism according to its various prophets. 1845–46. MECW 5: 19–539.
Manifesto of the Communist Party. 1848. MECW 6: 477–519.
Review: January-February. 1850. MECW 10: 257–70.
Review: May to October. 1850. MECW 10: 490–532.
Address to the Central Authority of the [Communist] League. 1850. MECW 10: 277–87.
Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy (Umrisse). 1844. MECW 3: 418–43.
The Condition of the Working-Class in England. 1845. MECW 4: 295–583.
The Free Trade Congress at Brussels. 1847. MECW 6: 282–90.
Principles of Communism. 1847. MECW 6: 341–57.
The Ten Hours' Question. 1850. MECW 10: 271–6.
The English Ten Hours' Bill. 1850. MECW 10: 288–300.
The Housing Question. 1873. MECW 23: 317–91.
The English Elections. 1874. MECW 23: 611–16.
Marx and Rodbertus. Preface to the First German Edition of The Poverty of Philosophy by Karl Marx. 1884. MECW 26: 278–91.
Introduction to Karl Marx's Wage Labour and Capital. 1891. MECW 27: 194–201.
Preface to the 1892 English Edition of The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844. 1892. MECW 27: 257–69.
Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring's Revolution in Science. 1894 (1878). MECW 25: 1–309.
The Peasant Question in France and Germany. 1894. MECW 27: 481–502.
Introduction to Karl Marx's The Class Struggles in France 1848 to 1850. 1895. MECW 27: 506–24.
Aikin, J. 1795. A Description of the Country from Thirty to Forty Miles Around Manchester. London: John Stockdale.Google Scholar
[Anon.], 1821. Observations on Certain Verbal Disputes in Political Economy, particularly relating to Value and to Demand and Supply. London: R. Hunter.Google Scholar
[Anon.], 1821. The Source and Remedy of the National Difficulties Deduced from Principles of Political Economy. A Letter to Lord John Russell. London: Rodwell and Martin.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. 2nd ed. London: Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1833. Traité sur l'économie des machines et des manufactures. 3rd ed. Tr. E. C. Biot. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1835. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. 4th ed. London: Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. 1825. A Critical Dissertation on the Nature, Measures, and Causes of Value; Chiefly in Reference to the Writings of Mr. Ricardo and His Followers. London: R. Hunter.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. 1837. Money and Its Vicissitudes in Value; as they affect National Industry and Pecuniary Contracts; with a Postscript on Joint-Stock Banks. London: Effingham Wilson.Google Scholar
Barton, J. 1817. Observations on the Circumstances which influence the Condition of the Labouring Classes of Society. London: Arch.Google Scholar
Bastiat, C. F. 1850. Gratuité du crédit. Discussion entre M. Fr. Bastiat et M. Proudhon. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Blake, W. 1823. Observations on the Effects Produced by the Expenditure of Government during the Restriction of Cash Payments. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Bray, J. F. 1839. Labour's Wrongs and Labour's Remedy. Leeds: David Green, Briggate.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. E. 1862. The Slave Power: Its Character, Career and Probable Designs: Being an attempt to explain the real issues involved in the American contest. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carey, H. C. 1837. Principles of Political Economy: Part the First: Of the Laws of the Production and Distribution of Wealth. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. 1840. Chartism. London: Fraser.Google Scholar
Cazenove, J. 1853. Preface, notes and supplementary remarks to Malthus 1827.
Chalmers, T. 1832. On Political Economy in Connexion with the Moral State and Moral Prospects of Society. Glasgow: William Collins.Google Scholar
Cherbuliez, A. 1841. Richesse ou pauvreté. Exposition des causes et des effets de la distribution actuelle des richesses sociales. Paris: Librairie d'Ab. Cherbuliez et Ce.Google Scholar
Colins, J. G. H. 1857. L'économie politique. Source des révolutions et des utopies prétendues socialistes. Vol. 3. Paris: Librairie Générale.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. 1826. Lectures on the Elements of Political Economy. Columbia, S.C.: Doyle E. Sweeny.Google Scholar
Corbet, T. 1841. An Inquiry into the Causes and Modes of the Wealth of Individuals; or the Principles of Trade and Speculation Explained. London: Smith, Elder and Company.Google Scholar
Quincey, T. 1844. The Logic of Political Economy. Edinburgh: Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
, Dilke C. W. 1855. Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations. 1851. London.Google Scholar
Edmonds, T. R. 1828. Practical Moral and Political Economy; or, the Government, Religion, and Institutions, Most Condusive to Individual Happiness and to National Power. London: E. Wilson.Google Scholar
Fawcett, H. 1865. The Economic Position of the British Labourer. Cambridge and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fourier, C. 1841. Théorie des quatre mouvements et des destinées générales. Vol. I of Oeuvres Complètes. 2nd ed. Paris: Bureaux de la Phalange.Google Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1825. Labour Defended Against the Claims of Capital. London: Knight and Lacey.Google Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1827. Popular Political Economy. London: C. and W. Tait.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1831. An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth, and on the Sources of Taxation: Part Ⅰ – Rent. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1833. An Introductory Lecture on Political Economy delivered at King's College. London.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1852. Textbook of Lectures on the Political Economy of Nations. Hertford.Google Scholar
Laing, S. 1844. National Distress; its Causes and Remedies. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Google Scholar
Lalor, J. 1852. Money and Morals. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Lardner, D. 1850. Railway Economy. London: Taylor, Walton and Maberly.Google Scholar
List, F. 1841. Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie, Erster Band. Stuttgart and Tübingen: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1825. The Principles of Political Economy, with a Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science. Edinburgh: William and Charles Tait.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1830. The Principles of Political Economy, with a Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science. 2nd ed. Edinburgh and London: Tait and Longmans.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1864. The Principles of Political Economy, with some inquiries respecting their application. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1820. Principles of Political Economy, considered with a view to their practical application. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1836. Principles of Political Economy, considered with a view to their practical application. 2nd ed. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1853 (1827). Definitions in Political Economy. Cazenove, John ed. London: Simpkin and Marshall.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1821. Elements of Political Economy. London: Baldwin, Craddock, and Joy.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1823. Élémens d'économie politique. Traduit de l'anglais par J. T. Parisot. Paris: Bossange.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1844. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions in Political Economy. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Necker, J. 1789 [1775]. Sur la législation et le commerce des grains. In Oeuvres de M. Necker. Vol. 4. Lausanne and Paris: Volland.Google Scholar
Necker, J. 1789 [1784]. De l'administration des finances de la France. In Oeuvres de M. Necker. Vol. 2. Lausanne and Paris: Volland.Google Scholar
Opdyke, G. 1851. A Treatise on Political Economy. New York: G.P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Pecqueur, C. 1842. Théorie nouvelle d'économie sociale et politique, ou études sur l'organisation des sociétés. Paris: Capelle.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1840. Qu'est-ce que la propriété? ou Recherches sur le principe du droit et du gouvernement. 2nd ed. 1841. Paris: Prévot.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1846. Système des contradictions économiques ou philosophie de la misère. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1868. De la capacité politique des classes ouvrières. Paris: Lacroix.Google Scholar
Ramsay, G. 1836. An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Ravenstone, P. [pseudonym of Richard Puller] 1824. Thoughts on the Funding System and its Effects. London: J. Andrews.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 1st. ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 3rd. ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Rodbertus-Jagetzow, J. K. 1842. Zur Erkenntniss unsrer staatswirthschaftlichen Zustände. Vol. 1. Neubrandenburg und Friedland: G. Barnewitz.Google Scholar
Rodbertus-Jagetzow, J. K. 1851. Sociale Briefe an von Kirchmann. Dritter Brief. Berlin: F. Gerhard.Google Scholar
Roscher, W. 1858. System der Volkswirthschaft. I: Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. L. E. 1843. Cours d'économie politique. Deuxième édition, revue et corrigée. Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge. [Paris: G.Thorel et Joubert.]Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1803. Traité d'Economie Politique ou Simple Exposition de la Manière dont se Forment, se Distribuent, et se Consomment les Richeses. 1st ed. Paris: Déterville.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1814. Traité d'Economie Politique. 2nd ed. Paris: Renouard.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1817. Traité d'Economie Politique. 3rd ed. Paris: Déterville.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1819. Notes Explicatives et Critiques to Ricardo 1819. Paris: J.P. Aïllaud.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1821 (1820). Letters to Mr. Malthus on Several Subjects of Political Economy and on the Cause of the Stagnation of Commerce. Translated from the French by John Richter. London: Sherwood, Neely & Jones.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1843 (1828–29). Cours Complet d'Economie Politique Pratique, 1–578. Ed. Say, Horace. Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge.Google Scholar
Schulz, W. 1843. Die Bewegung der Produktion. Zürich, Winterthur.Google Scholar
Senior, N. 1836. Principes fondamentaux de l'économie politique, tirés de leçons editées et inédites de Mr. Senior. Ed. Arrivabene, Jean. Paris: Aïllaud.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde de. 1819. Nouveaux Principes d'Économie Politique. Paris: Delaunay.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde de. 1827. Nouveaux Principes d'Économie Politique. 2nd ed. Paris: Delaunay.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde de. 1837–38. Études sur l'économie politique. Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, H. 1823. Cours d'Économie Politique: ou éxposition des principes qui déterminent la prosperité des nations. Paris: Bossange & Aïllaud.Google Scholar
Storch, H. 1824. Cours d'économie politique. V: Considérations sur la nature du revenu national. Paris: Bossange.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. 1824. An Inquiry into the Principles of the Distribution of Wealth. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. 1844. An Inquiry into the Currency Principle; the Connection of the Currency with Prices, and the Expediency of a Separation of Issue from Banking. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. 1848. A History of Prices, and of the State of the Circulation, from 1839 to 1847 inclusive: with a general review of the currency question. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. and Newmarch, W. 1857. A History of Prices, and of the State of the Circulation, during the Nine Years 1848–1856. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1815. An Essay on the External Corn Trade. London: J. Hatchard.Google Scholar
Turgot, A. R. J. 1844 (1766). Réflexions sur la formation et la distribution des richesses. In Daire, E. and Dussard, H. eds. Oeuvres. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Ure, A. 1836. Philosophie des Manufactures, ou économie industrielle de la fabrication du coton, de la laine, du lin, et de la soie, avec la description des diverses machines employées dans les ateliers anglais. Vol. 1. Bruxelles: Louis Haumann et Cie.Google Scholar
Wade, J. 1833. History of the Middle and Working Classes. London: E. Wilson.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. 1833. England and America. A Comparison of the Social and Political State of Both Nations. London: Bentley.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. 1835–39. Commentary to A. Smith An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Charles Knight & Co.Google Scholar
Wright, T. B. and Harlow, J. 1844. The Currency Question. The Gemini Letters. London and Birmingham: Simpkin, Marshall and Company.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. 1983. The “Unknown” Marx's Capital, Volume Ⅰ: The French Edition of 1872–75, 100 Years Later. Review of Radical Political Economics 15: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, R. and Romani, P.-M. 2002. Schumpeter on entrepreneurship. In Arena, R. and Dangel-Hagnauer, C. eds. The Contribution of Joseph Schumpeter to Economics: Economic development and institutional change, 167–83. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnon, A. 1984. Marx's Theory of Money: the Formative Years. History of Political Economy 16: 555–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avineri, S. 1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, W. 1962 (1873). Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
Bajt, A. 1971. Labor as Scarcity in Marx's Value Theory: An Alternative Interpretation. History of Political Economy 3: 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1974. The Transformation of Values: What Marx “Really” Meant (An Interpretation). Journal of Economic Literature 12: 51–62.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1975. A New Critique of Marx's Economics (a review of Morishima 1973). Monthly Review 26: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 2000. Review. History of Political Economy 32: 1037–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 2001. Priceless Value (or almost so): misunderstood concerns of Marx and Ricardo. In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 224–40. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. 1963. Karl Marx. His Life and Environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. 1961 (1899). Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism and Affirmation. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. 1989. On a Controversy over Ricardo's Theory of Distribution. In Themes in Value and Distribution. London: Unwin-Hyman.Google Scholar
Blanc, J.-J. L. 1845. Organsation du travail. 4th. ed. Brussels: Hauman.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1980. A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1986. Economic History and the History of Economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1988. Economics Through the Looking Glass: The Distorted Perspective of the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1991. Marx on the future of Capitalism. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 2: 36–58. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1995. Entrepreneurship in the History of Economic Thought. University of Exeter Discussion Paper95/15.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, E. von. 1890. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory. Trans. W. Smart. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bonar, J. 1924 (1885). Malthus and his Work. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L.. 1952 (1907). Value and Price in the Marxian System. International Economic Papers 2: 5–60.Google Scholar
Boss, H. 1990. Theories of Surplus and Transfer: Parasites and Producers in Economic Thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Bottigelli, E. 1969. Présentation, traduction et notes. Karl Marx: Manuscrits de 1844. Paris: Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Bowley, M. 1937. Nassau Senior and Classical Economics. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. 1995. A Minor Post-Ricardian? Marx as an Economist. History of Political Economy 27: 111–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1965. Das Kapital for the Modern Man. Science and Society 30: 205–26.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1966. The Marxian Macro-Economic Model: Extension from Two Departments. Kyklos 19: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1979. Macroeconomic alternatives. Arlington Heights Ill: AHM Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. and Wolfson, M. 1984. Marxian macrodynamics and the Harrod Growth Model. History of Political Economy 16: 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, M. T. 2002. Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on entrepreneurship and economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkett, P. 1999. Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. 1997. Introduction to Hayek 1997, 1–50.
Callari, A. 1988. Some Developments in Marxian Theory Since Schumpeter. In Thweatt, W. O. ed. Classical Political Economy: A Survey of Recent Literature, 227–58. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, D. 2001. On some controversial aspects of Sraffa's theoretical system in the second half of the 1920s. In Cozzi, T. and Marchionatti, R. eds. Piero Sraffa's Political Economy: A centenary estimate, 100–20. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, D. 2005. Review. History of Economic Ideas 13: 211–14.Google Scholar
Claeys, G. 1984. Engels' Outlines of a critique of political economy (1843) and the origins of the Marxist critique of capitalism. History of Political Economy 16: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogoy, M. 1987 [1973]. The Falling Rate of Profit and the Theory of Accumulation. International Journal of Political Economy 17: 54–74.Google Scholar
Cottrell, A. and Darity, W. A. 1988. Marx, Malthus, and wages. History of Political Economy 20: 173–90.Google Scholar
Brunhoff, S. 1976. Marx on Money. New York: Urizen Books.Google Scholar
Desai, M. 1991. The Transformation Problem. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 1: 3–44. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Desai, M. 1997. Hayek, Marx and Keynes. In Frowen, S. F. ed. Hayek: Economist and Social Philosopher. A Critical Retrospect, 1–8. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, H. D. 1956–57. The Falling Rate of Profit and the Theory of Accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 24: 120–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1933. Economic Theory and the Problems of a Socialist Economy. Economic Journal 43: 588–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1934–35. Economic Theory and Socialist Economy: a Reply. Review of Economic Studies 2: 144–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1959. The Falling Rate of Profit. Science and Society 23: 97–103.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1970. Introduction to Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859), 5–16. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1982. Marx's Critique of Political Economy. In Hobsbawm, E. J. ed. The History of Marxism 1: 79–102. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Dolléans, E. 1948. Proudhon. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Domar, E. 1946. Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment. Econometrica 14: 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostaler, G. 1982. Marx et Sraffa. L'Actualité Economique1–2: 95–114.Google Scholar
Dostaler, G. 1986. From Marx to Sraffa. History of Political Economy 18: 463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duménil, G. 1983–84. Beyond the Transformation Riddle: a Labor Theory of Value. Science and Society 47: 427–50.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. 1973. Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dussel, E. 2001. Towards an Unknown Marx: A Commentary on the Manuscripts of 1861–63. London and New York: Routledge.
Eatwell, J. 1987. Competition: Classical Conceptions. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 1: 537–40. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, J. and Panico, C. 1987. Sraffa, Piero (1898–1983). In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 445–51. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebenstein, A. 2001. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ebner, A. 2006. Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship Revisited: Historical Specificity and the Phases of Capitalist Development. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28: 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccarius, J. G. 1866–67. A Working Man's Refutation of Some Points of Political Economy endorsed and advocated by John Stuart Mill, Esq., MP. The Commonwealth. Nos. 192–5, 198, 200, 203–4, 206–11. (10 November 1866–23 March 1867.)Google Scholar
Elliott, C. F. 1967. Quis Custodiet Sacra? Problems of Marxist Revisionism. Journal of the History of Ideas 28: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. E. 1976. Marx and contemporary models of socialist economy. History of Political Economy 8: 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. E. 1979. Continuity and change in the evolution of Marx's theory of alienation from the Manuscripts through the Grundrisse to Capital. History of Political Economy 11: 317–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, M. 1987. Fel'dman, Grigorii Alexandrovich, 1884–1958. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P.. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 2: 299–301. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltis, W. 2000. The Classical Theory of Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltis, W. 2001. The French foundations of the classical canon. In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 185–204. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endres, A. M. 1997. Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory: The Founding Austrian Version. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdös, P. 1967. The Application of Marx's Model of Expanded Reproduction to Cycle Theory. Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays presented to Maurice Dobb, 59–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M. 1989. John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx: some problems and perspectives. History of Political Economy 21: 273–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1965. Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, B. 1990. On the composition of capital: a comment on Groll and Orzech. History of Political Economy 22: 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaschel, P. and Semmler, W. 1987. Classical and Neoclassical Competitive Adjustment Processes. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 55: 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. K. 1982. The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power, and the Marxian Transformation Problem. Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. K. 1986. Understanding Capital: Marx's Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, M. W. 1998. Schumpeter on Entrepreneurs and Innovation: A Reappraisal. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdland, T. 1958. The Life of Knut Wicksell. Stockholm: Almquist and Wicksell.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1987. Surplus Approach to Value and Distribution. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 560–74. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1998. Piero Sraffa. In Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. eds. The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics 2: 391–9. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giffen, R. 1904 (1883). The Progress of the Working Classes in the Last Half Century. Economic Inquiries and Studies 1: 382–422. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Gillman, J. M. 1956. The Falling Rate of Profit. New York: Cameron Associates.Google Scholar
Gloria-Palermo, S. 2002. Schumpeter and the old Austrian school: interpretations and influences. In Arena, R. and Dangel-Hagnauer, C. eds. The Contribution of Joseph Schumpeter to Economics: Economic development and institutional change, 21–39. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. 1968. Why Does Marxian Exploitation Theory Require a Labor Theory of Value?Journal of Political Economy 76: 137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottheil, F. M. 1966. Marx's Economic Predictions. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Groll, S. and Orzech, Z. B. 1987. Technical Progress and Values in Marx's Theory of the Decline in the Rate of Profit: an Exetical Approach. History of Political Economy 19: 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberler, G. von. 1958. Prosperity and Depression. A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1939. An Essay in Dynamic Theory. Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1948. Towards a Dynamic Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 1982. The Limits of Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.. 1967 (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von. 1988.The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Bartley, W. W. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von. 1997 (1939). Prices vs. Rationing. In Caldwell, B. ed. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek 10: Socialism, Documents, Reviews, 151–6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. P. 1986. Agency or alienation? Smith, Mill and Marx on the Joint-stock company. History of Political Economy 18: 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1950. A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1973. Capital and Time: A Neo-Austrian Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1965. The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of Du Pont Rayon Plants. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1973. The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1981. Marxian Economics as “General Equilibrium” Theory. History of Political Economy 13: 121–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1984. Marx and Malthusianism: Marx's Secular Path of Wages. American Economic Review 74: 139–51.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1986. Marx and Malthusianism: A Reply to Miguel Ramirez. American Economic Review 76: 548–50.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1991. Marx and the falling rate of profit. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 2: 3–35. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1992. Classical Economics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1995. Ricardo – the New View. Collected Essays I. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1997. The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1998. The Literature of Political Economy: Collected Essays Ⅱ. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1999. Jeremy Bentham and Adam Smith on the usury laws: a “Smithian” reply to Bentham and a new problem. European Journal of Economic Thought 6: 523–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2000. Sraffa and the Interpretation of Ricardo: The Marxian Dimension. History of Political Economy 32: 187–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2001. “Classical Economics.” A reification wrapped in an anachronism? In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 7–26. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2003. Engels-Marx Versus Malthus on Distribution and the Population Issue. In Hum, D. ed. Faith, Reason, and Economics: Essays in Honour of Anthony Waterman, 135–52. Winnipeg: St. John's College Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 2004. Economic Organization, Distribution and the Equality Issue: The Marx-Engels Perspective. Review of Austrian Economics 17: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2005. Jean-Baptiste Say and the Classical Canon in Economics: the British Connection in French Classicism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horverak, Ø. 1988. Marx's view of competition and price formation. History of Political Economy 20: 275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. 2000. Review. History of Political Economy 32: 1039–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1985. The Political Economy of Marx. 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1989. A History of Marxian Economics: Volume Ⅰ, 1883–1929. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1992a. A History of Marxian Economics: Volume 2, 1929–1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1992b. Marx, Jones, Rodbertus and the Theory of Absolute Rent. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 2001. Where Marx was right: towards a more secure foundation for heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25: 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. K. and Glick, M. 1987. Transformation Problem. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 688–91. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Husami, Z. 1978. Marx on Distributive Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8: 27–64.Google Scholar
Indart, G. 1990. The Formation and Transformation of Market Value. History of Political Economy 22: 721–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, M. 1976. A Study of Marx's Theory of Value. Science and Society 40: 307–40.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1883 (1868). Trades Societies: Their Objects and Policy. Methods of Social Reform and Other Papers, 101–21. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1910 (1882). The State in Relation to Labour. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. 1969. The “Last Hour” of Senior and Marx. History of Political Economy 2: 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. 1976. An Introduction to Modern Theories of Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Judt, T. 2006. Review. The New York Review of Books 53(14): 88–92.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1954. The Relation of Economic Growth and Cyclical Fluctuations. Economic Journal 64: 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayali, R. and Sari, O. 1989. The Winternitz Solution: A Comment. History of Economics Society Bulletin 11: 238–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, J. E. 1979. Marx as an historian of economic thought. History of Political Economy 11: 282–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. and Pomer, M. eds. 2001. The New Russia: Transition Gone Astray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1942. Profit and Entrepreneurial Functions. The Journal of Economic History 2: 126–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1964 (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Kurz, H. D. 1979. Review of Steedman 1977. Australian Economic Papers 18: 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. 1988. Understanding “Classical” Economics: Studies in Long-Period Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. 1940. Schumpeter's Business Cycles. The American Economic Review 30: 257–71.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, O. 1935. Marxian Economics and Modern Economic Theory. Review of Economic Studies. 2: 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, R. N. 2003. Schumpeter and the obsolescence of the entrepreneur. In Koppl, R. ed. Advances in Austrian Economics 6: Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies, 283–98. Oxford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Lapides, K. 1994. Henryk Grossman on Marx's Wage Theory and the “Increasing Misery” Controversy. History of Political Economy 26: 239–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapides, K. 1998. Marx's Wage Theory in Historical Perspective: Its Origins, Development and Interpretation. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. 1983. Some strengths in Marx's disequilibrium theory of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 7: 55–68.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, M. A. 2003. Beyond “Capital”: Marx's Political Economy of the Working Class. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. 1966 (1938). The significance of Marxian economics for present-day economic theory. Essays in Economics: Theories and Theorizing, 72–83. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. 1934–35a. Economic Theory and Socialist Economy. Review of Economic Studies 2: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, A. 1934–35b. A Rejoinder to Dobb. Review of Economic Studies 2: 152–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, N. 1975. The Tragic Deception: Marx Contra Engels. Oxford: Clio Books.Google Scholar
Lipietz, A. 1982. The So-Called “Transformation Problem” Revisited. Journal of Economic Theory 26: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longfield, M. 1834. Lectures on Political Economy. Dublin: Richard Milliken and Son.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, R. 1951 (1913). The Accumulation of Capital. New York and London: Modern Reader Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. 1963. Essays in Economic Semantics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1962. Traité d'économie marxiste. Paris: René Julliard.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1971. The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx: 1843 to Capital. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mangoldt, H. K. E. von. 1855. Die Lehre vom Unternehmergewinn: ein Beitrag zur Volkswirtschaftslehre. Leipzig: Teuber.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics 8th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
März, E. 1991. Joseph Schumpeter: Scholar, Teacher and Politician. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, E. S. 1957. Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. C. O. 1959. The Business Cycle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McLellan, D. 1970. On the Importance of the “Grundrisse.” Encounter 35: 34–45.Google Scholar
McLellan, D. 1973. Karl Marx. His Life and Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meade, J. E. 1968. The Growing Economy: Principles of Political Economy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Medio, A. 1972. Profits and Surplus-Value. Appearance and Reality in Capitalist Production. In Hunt, E. K. and Schwartz, J. G. eds. A Critique of Economic Theory, 312–46. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1962. The Economics of Physiocracy: Essays and Translations. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1967. Economics and Ideology and Other Essays: Studies in the Development of Economic Thought. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1975. Introduction, Studies in the Labor Theory of Value. 2nd ed. ⅰ–ⅹⅼⅳ. London and New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1826). Paper Currency and Commercial Distress. Collected Works 4: 71–123. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1836). Civilization. Collected Works 18: 116–47. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1844). Of the Influence of Consumption on Production. Essay Ⅱ in Essays on Some Unsettled Questions in Political Economy. Collected Works 4: 262–79. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1848). Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. (1st ed. 1848, 7th ed. 1871.) Collected Works 2–3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 [1879]. Chapters on Socialism. Collected Works 5. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von. 1947. Planned Chaos. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von. 1980 [1950]. Planning for Freedom. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. and Catephores, G. 1975. Is There an Historical Transformation Problem?Economic Journal 85: 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, F. ed. 2005. Marx's theory of money: modern appraisals. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L. S. 1979. Professor Hollander and Ricardian Economics. Eastern Economic Journal 5: 501–12.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. 1999. Marx's Concept of Money: The god of commodities. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikaido, H. 1983. Marx on competition. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 43: 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1976. Two Notes on Marx and the “Transformation Problem.” Economica 43: 411–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1979. Aspects of Marx's Grundrisse as Intellectual Foundations for a Major Theme of Capital. History of Political Economy 11: 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1983. The Making of Marx's Critical Theory: A Bibliographical Analysis. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. 1984. Marx's Critique of Political Economy: Intellectual Sources and Evolution 1. 1844 to 1860. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. 1985. Marx's Critique of Political Economy: Intellectual Sources and Evolution 2. 1861 to 1863. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1981. Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo. Oxford Economic Papers 33: 352–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 2004. The Classical Economists Revisited. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. and Darnell, A. C. 1982. Authorship Puzzles in the History of Economics: A Statistical Approach. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, N. P. 1980. Marx's Classical and Post-Classical Conceptions of the Wage. Australian Economic Papers 19: 264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orzech, Z. B. and Groll, S. 1989. Stages in the development of a Marxian concept: the composition of capital. History of Political Economy 21: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overstone, Lord. 1856. Speech on Limited Liability. Hansard. 3rd series. ⅭⅩⅬⅠ. 139–43. 14 March.
Overstone, Lord. 1971. Correspondence. O'Brien, D. P. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patinkin, D. 1981. Essays on and In the Chicago Tradition. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, P. L. 1978. Industrial Entrepreneurship and Management in Great Britain. In Mathias, P. and Postan, M. M. eds. The Cambridge Economic History of Europe 7: 180–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perelman, M. 1985. Marx, Malthus and the organic composition of capital. History of Political Economy 17: 461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorni, D. 1985. Karl Marx and General Equilibrium. History of Political Economy 17: 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1983 (1945). Marx's Theory of the State. In Miller, D. ed. A Pocket Popper, 326–37. Oxford: Fontana.Google Scholar
Porta, P. L. 2001. Sraffa's Ricardo after fifty years. In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 241–69. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potier, J. P. 1991. Piero Sraffa. Unorthodox Economist, 1898–1983. A Biographical Essay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pullen, J. M. 1989. In defence of Senior's last hour-and-twenty-five-minutes. History of Political Economy 21: 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainelli, M. 1983. Entrepreneur et Profits Dans les “Principles” de John Stuart Mill et d'Alfred Marshall. Revue Economique 34: 794–810.Google Scholar
Ramirez, M. D. 1986. Marx and Malthusianism: Comment. American Economic Review 76: 543–7.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1835 (1819). Des Principes de l'Économie Politique et de l'Impôt … traduit de l'anglais par F. S. Constancio … avec des notes explicatives et critiques par Jean-Baptiste Say. Bruxelles: H. Dumont.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–73. Principles of Political Economy. Works and Correspondence. Vol. 1. Sraffa, P. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–73 (1820). Notes on Malthus's Principles of Political Economy. Works and Correspondence. Vol. 2. Sraffa, P. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lord. 1979. Against Inflation: Speeches in the Second Chamber 1965–1977. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lord 1998. A History of Economic Thought: The LSE Lectures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. H. 1915. A Study of Business Fluctuation. London: P.S. King.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1951. Introduction to Rosa Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital, 13–28. New York and London: Modern Reader Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1967 (1942). An Essay on Marxian Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1948). Marx and Keynes. Collected Economic Papers 1: 133–45. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1955). Marx, Marshall and Keynes. Collected Economic Papers 2: 1–17. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1968). Economics versus Political Economy. Collected Economic Papers 4: 25–32. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1978). Formalism Versus Dogma. Collected Economic Papers 5: 275–9. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E. 1983. Exploitation, class and property relations. In Ball, T. and Farr, J. eds. After Marx, 184–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1982. Hollander's Ricardo. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 4: 339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1998. Piero Sraffa as an Interpreter of the Classical Economists. In Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. eds. The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics 2: 399–404. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosdolsky, R. 1980. The Making of Marx's “Capital”. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1974. Karl Marx on the Economic Role of Science. Journal of Political Economy 82: 713–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1976. Marx as a student of technology. Monthly Review 28: 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1991. Marx wasn't all wrong. Scientific American. December: 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1994. Exploring the Black Box: Technology, economics and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubel, M. 1963. ed. Oeuvres de Karl Marx. Économie I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rubel, M. 1968. ed. Oeuvres de Karl Marx. Économie Ⅱ. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rubel, M. 1982. ed. Oeuvres de Karl Marx. Philosophie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L. and Wolfson, M. 1986. Expository Marxism and comparative economic dynamics. History of Political Economy 18: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1957. Wages and Interest: A Modern Dissection of Marxian Economic Models. American Economic Review 47: 341–69.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1961. Abstract of a Theorem Concerning Substitutability in Open Leontief Models. In Koopmans, T. C., ed. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, 142–6. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1967. Marxian Economics as Economics. American Economic Review 57: 616–23.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1971. Understanding the Marxian Theory of Exploitation: a Summary of the So-called Transformation Problem. Journal of Economic Literature 9: 399–431.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1978. The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy. Journal of Economic Literature 16: 1415–34.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1987. Sraffian Economics. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 452–61 London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1990. Revisionist Findings on Sraffa. In Bharadwaj, K. and Schefold, B. eds. Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, 263–80. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1991a. Logic of the Historical Transformation Problem: Exchange Ratios under Simple Commodity Production. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 1: 145–68. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1991b. Conversations with my History of Economics Critics. In Shaw, G. K. ed. Economics, Culture and Education: Essays in Honour of Mark Blaug, 3–13. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1992. Marx on Rent: A Failure to Transform Correctly. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 2000. Revisionist findings on Sraffa. In Kurz, H. D. ed. Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics, 25–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardoni, C. 1986. Marx and Keynes on effective demand and unemployment. History of Political Economy 18: 419–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefold, B. 1976. Different Forms of Technical Progress. Economic Journal 86: 806–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefold, B. 1996. Piero Sraffa, 1898–1983. Economic Journal 106: 1314–25.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1952. Ten Great Economists: From Marx to Keynes. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1959 [1926]. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 2003 (1928). Entrepreneur. (Translated by M. C. Becker and T. Knudsen.) In Koppl, R. ed. Advances in Austrian Economics 6: Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies, 235–65. Oxford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Seccombe, W. 1983. Marxism and Demography. New Left Review 137: 22–47.Google Scholar
Semmler, W. 1984. Marx and Schumpeter on Competition, Transient Surplus Profit and Technical Change. Economie appliquée 37: 419–55.Google Scholar
Semmler, W. 1987. Competition: marxian conceptions. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 1: 540–2. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, N. 1837. Letters on the Factory Acts as it affects the Cotton Manufacture. London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar
Service, R. 2000. Lenin: A Biography. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seton, F. 1976 (1957). The “Transformation Problem.” In Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. eds. The Economics of Marx, 162–76. Harmondworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A. 1954 (1931). The Coming of General Limited Liability. In Carus-Wilson, E. M. ed. Essays in Economic History 1: 358–79. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A. 1954 (1933). The Limited Companies of 1866–1883. In Carus-Wilson, E. M. ed. Essays in Economic History 1: 380–405. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sinha, A. 1997. The Transformation Problem: A Critique of the “New Solution.” Review of Radical Political Economics 29: 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A. 1998. Hollander's Marx and Malthusianism: A Critique. The History of Economics Review (Australia) 29: 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A. 2001. Review. Review of Radical Political Economics 33: 241–4.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde. 1951. Nouveaux Principes d'Économie Politique. 3rd ed. Genève & Paris: Edition Jeheber.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1937 (1776). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 1960. Marx's “Increasing Misery” Doctrine. American Economic Review 50: 111–20.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 1967. Marx's Capital After One Hundred Years. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 33: 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowell, T. 1980. Knowledge and Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 2006. On Classical Economics. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. Papers. Wren Library. Trinity College. Cambridge.
Sraffa, P. 1926. The Laws of Return under Competitive Conditions. Economic Journal 36: 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1951. Introduction to vol. 1 of Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ⅶ–ⅼⅻ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1960. The Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 1987. Engels, Friedrich. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics 2: 144–6. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. 1982. Marx on Ricardo. In Bradley, I. and Howard, M. eds. Classical and Marxian Political Economy: Essays in Honor of Ronald L. Meek, 115–56. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1995. Comment on Brewer 1995. History of Political Economy 27: 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1965. Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1968. Marx and the Industrial Revolution. In Eagly, R. V. ed. Events, Ideology and Economic Theory: the Determinants of Progress in the Development of Economic Analysis, 107–19. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1981. Marxian Value Theory and Crises. In Steedman, I.The Value Controversy, 20–35. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1987 (1973). Some Problems in the Theory of Capital Accumulation. International Journal of Political Economy 17: 38–53.Google Scholar
Tomass, M. 1998. On the Relativist Fallacy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, K. 1974. Remarks on the Theoretical Significance of Marx's Grundrisse. Economy and Society 3: 180–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, G. S. L. 1961. Ricardo and Marx. Economica 28: 252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, J. 1931 (1757). Instructions for Travellers. In Schuyler, R. L. ed. Josiah Tucker: A Selection of his Economic and Political Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. C. 1969. The Marxian Revolutionary Idea. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. C. 1972. Ed. The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tuttle, C. A. 1927. The Entrepreneur Function in Economic Literature. The Journal of Political Economy 35: 501–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. 2005. Incommensurability, Ecology, and Planning. History of Political Economy 37: 309–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, K. 1998. Review of Caldwell 1997. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 235–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walras, L. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics. Jaffé, W. ed. 4th definitive ed. 1926. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1998. Reappraisal of “Malthus the Economist,” 1933–97. History of Political Economy 30: 293–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1995. Editor's introduction to minisymposium: Locating Marx After the Fall. History of Political Economy 27: 109–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E. G. 1983. Marx's Hypotheses on the Length of the Working Day. Journal of Political Economy 91: 266–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 2003. Alfred Marshall's Principles and Industry and Trade: Two Books or One? Marshall and the Joint Stock Company. In Arena, R. and Quéré, M. eds. The Economics of Alfred Marshall: Revisiting Marshall's Legacy, 137–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williams, P. L. 1982. Monopoly and centralization in Marx. History of Political Economy 14: 228–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, E. N. 1979. The Rate of Surplus Value, the Organic Composition and the General Rate of Profit in the U.S. Economy, 1947–67. American Economic Review 69: 329–41.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M. 1966. A Reappraisal of Marxian Economics. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M. 1979. Three Stages in Marx's Thought. History of Political Economy 11: 117–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. 1972. The Marxian Critique of Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 244–82.Google Scholar
Paris Notebooks. Comments on James Mill, Élémens d'économie politique. 1844. MECW 3: 211–28.
Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts. 1844. MECW 3: 229–346.
Correspondence. 1844–83. MECW 38–46.
Draft of an Article on Friedrich List's Book Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie. 1845. MECW 4: 265–93.
The Poverty of Philosophy. An Answer to the “Philosophy of Poverty” by M. Proudhon. 1847. MECW 6: 105–212.
Wages. 1847. MECW 6: 415–37.
Speech on the Question of Free Trade, Brussels. 1848. MECW 6: 450–65.
Wage Labour and Capital. 1849. MECW 9: 197–228.
The Class Struggles in France, 1848 to 1850. 1850. MECW 10: 45–145.
The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 1852. MECW 11: 99–197.
The French Crédit Mobilier. 1856. MECW 15: 8–24.
Project for the Regulation of the Price of Bread in France. 1858. MECW 16: 110–14.
Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy. (Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie.) 1857–58. MECW 28; 29: 5–251.
A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Part Ⅰ). 1859. MECW 29: 257–417.
Economic Manuscripts. 1861–63. MECW 30–34. Includes “Theories of Surplus Value.” 30: 348–51; 31; 32; 33: 7–371.
Inaugural Address of the Working Men's International Association. 1864. MECW 20: 5–13.
On Proudhon [Open Letter]. 1865. MECW 20: 26–33.
Value, Price and Profit. 1865. MECW 20: 101–49.
Instructions for the Delegates of the Provisional General Council of the International Working Men's Association [Geneva Congress]. 1866. MECW 20: 185–94.
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy 1. 1867. MECW 35.
First Draft of The Civil War in France. 1871. (April-May.) MECW 22: 437–514.
The Civil War in France. Address of the General Council of the International Working Men's Association. 3rd ed. 1871. MECW 22: 307–59.
Interview with The World Correspondent. 1871. MECW 22: 600–6.
Speech on Trade Unions. From minutes of the session of the London Conference of the International Working Men's Association. 1871. MECW 22: 614–15.
Political Indifferentism. 1873. MECW 23: 392–7.
Letter to Wilhelm Bracke, March 18–28, regarding “Critique of the Gotha Programme.” 1875. MECW 24: 77–9.
Critique of the Gotha Programme. Marginal notes on the unity programme of the German Workers' Party. 1875. MECW 24: 81–99.
Preamble to the Programme of the French Workers' Party. 1880. MECW 24: 340–1.
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy 2. 1885. F. Engels ed. MECW 36.
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy 3. 1894. F. Engels ed. MECW 37.
Manuscrits Parisiens Ⅰ. Notes de lecture. 1844. Marx 1968: 7–43.
Manuscrits Parisiens Ⅱ. Ébauche d'une critique de l'économie politique. 1844: Marx 1968: 44–141.
Capital 1. 1965. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Capital 1. 1976. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin (cited as Marx 1976).
Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. 1973 (1857–58). Translated with a Foreward by Martin Nicolaus. New York: Vintage Books; Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
The Letters of Karl Marx. 1979. Padover, S. K., ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
The Holy Family or Critique of Critical Criticism Against Bruno Bauer and Company. 1845. MECW 4: 4–211.
The German Ideology. Critique of Modern German Philosophy According to its Representatives Feuerbach, B. Bauer and Stirner, and of German Socialism according to its various prophets. 1845–46. MECW 5: 19–539.
Manifesto of the Communist Party. 1848. MECW 6: 477–519.
Review: January-February. 1850. MECW 10: 257–70.
Review: May to October. 1850. MECW 10: 490–532.
Address to the Central Authority of the [Communist] League. 1850. MECW 10: 277–87.
Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy (Umrisse). 1844. MECW 3: 418–43.
The Condition of the Working-Class in England. 1845. MECW 4: 295–583.
The Free Trade Congress at Brussels. 1847. MECW 6: 282–90.
Principles of Communism. 1847. MECW 6: 341–57.
The Ten Hours' Question. 1850. MECW 10: 271–6.
The English Ten Hours' Bill. 1850. MECW 10: 288–300.
The Housing Question. 1873. MECW 23: 317–91.
The English Elections. 1874. MECW 23: 611–16.
Marx and Rodbertus. Preface to the First German Edition of The Poverty of Philosophy by Karl Marx. 1884. MECW 26: 278–91.
Introduction to Karl Marx's Wage Labour and Capital. 1891. MECW 27: 194–201.
Preface to the 1892 English Edition of The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844. 1892. MECW 27: 257–69.
Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring's Revolution in Science. 1894 (1878). MECW 25: 1–309.
The Peasant Question in France and Germany. 1894. MECW 27: 481–502.
Introduction to Karl Marx's The Class Struggles in France 1848 to 1850. 1895. MECW 27: 506–24.
Aikin, J. 1795. A Description of the Country from Thirty to Forty Miles Around Manchester. London: John Stockdale.Google Scholar
[Anon.], 1821. Observations on Certain Verbal Disputes in Political Economy, particularly relating to Value and to Demand and Supply. London: R. Hunter.Google Scholar
[Anon.], 1821. The Source and Remedy of the National Difficulties Deduced from Principles of Political Economy. A Letter to Lord John Russell. London: Rodwell and Martin.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. 2nd ed. London: Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1833. Traité sur l'économie des machines et des manufactures. 3rd ed. Tr. E. C. Biot. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1835. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. 4th ed. London: Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. 1825. A Critical Dissertation on the Nature, Measures, and Causes of Value; Chiefly in Reference to the Writings of Mr. Ricardo and His Followers. London: R. Hunter.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. 1837. Money and Its Vicissitudes in Value; as they affect National Industry and Pecuniary Contracts; with a Postscript on Joint-Stock Banks. London: Effingham Wilson.Google Scholar
Barton, J. 1817. Observations on the Circumstances which influence the Condition of the Labouring Classes of Society. London: Arch.Google Scholar
Bastiat, C. F. 1850. Gratuité du crédit. Discussion entre M. Fr. Bastiat et M. Proudhon. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Blake, W. 1823. Observations on the Effects Produced by the Expenditure of Government during the Restriction of Cash Payments. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Bray, J. F. 1839. Labour's Wrongs and Labour's Remedy. Leeds: David Green, Briggate.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. E. 1862. The Slave Power: Its Character, Career and Probable Designs: Being an attempt to explain the real issues involved in the American contest. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carey, H. C. 1837. Principles of Political Economy: Part the First: Of the Laws of the Production and Distribution of Wealth. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. 1840. Chartism. London: Fraser.Google Scholar
Cazenove, J. 1853. Preface, notes and supplementary remarks to Malthus 1827.
Chalmers, T. 1832. On Political Economy in Connexion with the Moral State and Moral Prospects of Society. Glasgow: William Collins.Google Scholar
Cherbuliez, A. 1841. Richesse ou pauvreté. Exposition des causes et des effets de la distribution actuelle des richesses sociales. Paris: Librairie d'Ab. Cherbuliez et Ce.Google Scholar
Colins, J. G. H. 1857. L'économie politique. Source des révolutions et des utopies prétendues socialistes. Vol. 3. Paris: Librairie Générale.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. 1826. Lectures on the Elements of Political Economy. Columbia, S.C.: Doyle E. Sweeny.Google Scholar
Corbet, T. 1841. An Inquiry into the Causes and Modes of the Wealth of Individuals; or the Principles of Trade and Speculation Explained. London: Smith, Elder and Company.Google Scholar
Quincey, T. 1844. The Logic of Political Economy. Edinburgh: Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
, Dilke C. W. 1855. Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations. 1851. London.Google Scholar
Edmonds, T. R. 1828. Practical Moral and Political Economy; or, the Government, Religion, and Institutions, Most Condusive to Individual Happiness and to National Power. London: E. Wilson.Google Scholar
Fawcett, H. 1865. The Economic Position of the British Labourer. Cambridge and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fourier, C. 1841. Théorie des quatre mouvements et des destinées générales. Vol. I of Oeuvres Complètes. 2nd ed. Paris: Bureaux de la Phalange.Google Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1825. Labour Defended Against the Claims of Capital. London: Knight and Lacey.Google Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1827. Popular Political Economy. London: C. and W. Tait.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1831. An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth, and on the Sources of Taxation: Part Ⅰ – Rent. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1833. An Introductory Lecture on Political Economy delivered at King's College. London.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1852. Textbook of Lectures on the Political Economy of Nations. Hertford.Google Scholar
Laing, S. 1844. National Distress; its Causes and Remedies. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Google Scholar
Lalor, J. 1852. Money and Morals. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Lardner, D. 1850. Railway Economy. London: Taylor, Walton and Maberly.Google Scholar
List, F. 1841. Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie, Erster Band. Stuttgart and Tübingen: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1825. The Principles of Political Economy, with a Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science. Edinburgh: William and Charles Tait.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1830. The Principles of Political Economy, with a Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science. 2nd ed. Edinburgh and London: Tait and Longmans.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1864. The Principles of Political Economy, with some inquiries respecting their application. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1820. Principles of Political Economy, considered with a view to their practical application. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1836. Principles of Political Economy, considered with a view to their practical application. 2nd ed. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1853 (1827). Definitions in Political Economy. Cazenove, John ed. London: Simpkin and Marshall.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1821. Elements of Political Economy. London: Baldwin, Craddock, and Joy.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1823. Élémens d'économie politique. Traduit de l'anglais par J. T. Parisot. Paris: Bossange.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1844. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions in Political Economy. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Necker, J. 1789 [1775]. Sur la législation et le commerce des grains. In Oeuvres de M. Necker. Vol. 4. Lausanne and Paris: Volland.Google Scholar
Necker, J. 1789 [1784]. De l'administration des finances de la France. In Oeuvres de M. Necker. Vol. 2. Lausanne and Paris: Volland.Google Scholar
Opdyke, G. 1851. A Treatise on Political Economy. New York: G.P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Pecqueur, C. 1842. Théorie nouvelle d'économie sociale et politique, ou études sur l'organisation des sociétés. Paris: Capelle.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1840. Qu'est-ce que la propriété? ou Recherches sur le principe du droit et du gouvernement. 2nd ed. 1841. Paris: Prévot.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1846. Système des contradictions économiques ou philosophie de la misère. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1868. De la capacité politique des classes ouvrières. Paris: Lacroix.Google Scholar
Ramsay, G. 1836. An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Ravenstone, P. [pseudonym of Richard Puller] 1824. Thoughts on the Funding System and its Effects. London: J. Andrews.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 1st. ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 3rd. ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Rodbertus-Jagetzow, J. K. 1842. Zur Erkenntniss unsrer staatswirthschaftlichen Zustände. Vol. 1. Neubrandenburg und Friedland: G. Barnewitz.Google Scholar
Rodbertus-Jagetzow, J. K. 1851. Sociale Briefe an von Kirchmann. Dritter Brief. Berlin: F. Gerhard.Google Scholar
Roscher, W. 1858. System der Volkswirthschaft. I: Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. L. E. 1843. Cours d'économie politique. Deuxième édition, revue et corrigée. Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge. [Paris: G.Thorel et Joubert.]Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1803. Traité d'Economie Politique ou Simple Exposition de la Manière dont se Forment, se Distribuent, et se Consomment les Richeses. 1st ed. Paris: Déterville.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1814. Traité d'Economie Politique. 2nd ed. Paris: Renouard.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1817. Traité d'Economie Politique. 3rd ed. Paris: Déterville.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1819. Notes Explicatives et Critiques to Ricardo 1819. Paris: J.P. Aïllaud.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1821 (1820). Letters to Mr. Malthus on Several Subjects of Political Economy and on the Cause of the Stagnation of Commerce. Translated from the French by John Richter. London: Sherwood, Neely & Jones.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1843 (1828–29). Cours Complet d'Economie Politique Pratique, 1–578. Ed. Say, Horace. Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge.Google Scholar
Schulz, W. 1843. Die Bewegung der Produktion. Zürich, Winterthur.Google Scholar
Senior, N. 1836. Principes fondamentaux de l'économie politique, tirés de leçons editées et inédites de Mr. Senior. Ed. Arrivabene, Jean. Paris: Aïllaud.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde de. 1819. Nouveaux Principes d'Économie Politique. Paris: Delaunay.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde de. 1827. Nouveaux Principes d'Économie Politique. 2nd ed. Paris: Delaunay.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde de. 1837–38. Études sur l'économie politique. Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, H. 1823. Cours d'Économie Politique: ou éxposition des principes qui déterminent la prosperité des nations. Paris: Bossange & Aïllaud.Google Scholar
Storch, H. 1824. Cours d'économie politique. V: Considérations sur la nature du revenu national. Paris: Bossange.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. 1824. An Inquiry into the Principles of the Distribution of Wealth. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. 1844. An Inquiry into the Currency Principle; the Connection of the Currency with Prices, and the Expediency of a Separation of Issue from Banking. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. 1848. A History of Prices, and of the State of the Circulation, from 1839 to 1847 inclusive: with a general review of the currency question. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. and Newmarch, W. 1857. A History of Prices, and of the State of the Circulation, during the Nine Years 1848–1856. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1815. An Essay on the External Corn Trade. London: J. Hatchard.Google Scholar
Turgot, A. R. J. 1844 (1766). Réflexions sur la formation et la distribution des richesses. In Daire, E. and Dussard, H. eds. Oeuvres. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Ure, A. 1836. Philosophie des Manufactures, ou économie industrielle de la fabrication du coton, de la laine, du lin, et de la soie, avec la description des diverses machines employées dans les ateliers anglais. Vol. 1. Bruxelles: Louis Haumann et Cie.Google Scholar
Wade, J. 1833. History of the Middle and Working Classes. London: E. Wilson.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. 1833. England and America. A Comparison of the Social and Political State of Both Nations. London: Bentley.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. 1835–39. Commentary to A. Smith An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Charles Knight & Co.Google Scholar
Wright, T. B. and Harlow, J. 1844. The Currency Question. The Gemini Letters. London and Birmingham: Simpkin, Marshall and Company.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. 1983. The “Unknown” Marx's Capital, Volume Ⅰ: The French Edition of 1872–75, 100 Years Later. Review of Radical Political Economics 15: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, R. and Romani, P.-M. 2002. Schumpeter on entrepreneurship. In Arena, R. and Dangel-Hagnauer, C. eds. The Contribution of Joseph Schumpeter to Economics: Economic development and institutional change, 167–83. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnon, A. 1984. Marx's Theory of Money: the Formative Years. History of Political Economy 16: 555–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avineri, S. 1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, W. 1962 (1873). Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
Bajt, A. 1971. Labor as Scarcity in Marx's Value Theory: An Alternative Interpretation. History of Political Economy 3: 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1974. The Transformation of Values: What Marx “Really” Meant (An Interpretation). Journal of Economic Literature 12: 51–62.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1975. A New Critique of Marx's Economics (a review of Morishima 1973). Monthly Review 26: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 2000. Review. History of Political Economy 32: 1037–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 2001. Priceless Value (or almost so): misunderstood concerns of Marx and Ricardo. In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 224–40. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. 1963. Karl Marx. His Life and Environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. 1961 (1899). Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism and Affirmation. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. 1989. On a Controversy over Ricardo's Theory of Distribution. In Themes in Value and Distribution. London: Unwin-Hyman.Google Scholar
Blanc, J.-J. L. 1845. Organsation du travail. 4th. ed. Brussels: Hauman.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1980. A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1986. Economic History and the History of Economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1988. Economics Through the Looking Glass: The Distorted Perspective of the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1991. Marx on the future of Capitalism. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 2: 36–58. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1995. Entrepreneurship in the History of Economic Thought. University of Exeter Discussion Paper95/15.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, E. von. 1890. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory. Trans. W. Smart. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bonar, J. 1924 (1885). Malthus and his Work. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L.. 1952 (1907). Value and Price in the Marxian System. International Economic Papers 2: 5–60.Google Scholar
Boss, H. 1990. Theories of Surplus and Transfer: Parasites and Producers in Economic Thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Bottigelli, E. 1969. Présentation, traduction et notes. Karl Marx: Manuscrits de 1844. Paris: Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Bowley, M. 1937. Nassau Senior and Classical Economics. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. 1995. A Minor Post-Ricardian? Marx as an Economist. History of Political Economy 27: 111–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1965. Das Kapital for the Modern Man. Science and Society 30: 205–26.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1966. The Marxian Macro-Economic Model: Extension from Two Departments. Kyklos 19: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1979. Macroeconomic alternatives. Arlington Heights Ill: AHM Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. and Wolfson, M. 1984. Marxian macrodynamics and the Harrod Growth Model. History of Political Economy 16: 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, M. T. 2002. Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on entrepreneurship and economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkett, P. 1999. Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. 1997. Introduction to Hayek 1997, 1–50.
Callari, A. 1988. Some Developments in Marxian Theory Since Schumpeter. In Thweatt, W. O. ed. Classical Political Economy: A Survey of Recent Literature, 227–58. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, D. 2001. On some controversial aspects of Sraffa's theoretical system in the second half of the 1920s. In Cozzi, T. and Marchionatti, R. eds. Piero Sraffa's Political Economy: A centenary estimate, 100–20. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, D. 2005. Review. History of Economic Ideas 13: 211–14.Google Scholar
Claeys, G. 1984. Engels' Outlines of a critique of political economy (1843) and the origins of the Marxist critique of capitalism. History of Political Economy 16: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogoy, M. 1987 [1973]. The Falling Rate of Profit and the Theory of Accumulation. International Journal of Political Economy 17: 54–74.Google Scholar
Cottrell, A. and Darity, W. A. 1988. Marx, Malthus, and wages. History of Political Economy 20: 173–90.Google Scholar
Brunhoff, S. 1976. Marx on Money. New York: Urizen Books.Google Scholar
Desai, M. 1991. The Transformation Problem. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 1: 3–44. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Desai, M. 1997. Hayek, Marx and Keynes. In Frowen, S. F. ed. Hayek: Economist and Social Philosopher. A Critical Retrospect, 1–8. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, H. D. 1956–57. The Falling Rate of Profit and the Theory of Accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 24: 120–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1933. Economic Theory and the Problems of a Socialist Economy. Economic Journal 43: 588–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1934–35. Economic Theory and Socialist Economy: a Reply. Review of Economic Studies 2: 144–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1959. The Falling Rate of Profit. Science and Society 23: 97–103.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1970. Introduction to Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859), 5–16. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M. 1982. Marx's Critique of Political Economy. In Hobsbawm, E. J. ed. The History of Marxism 1: 79–102. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Dolléans, E. 1948. Proudhon. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Domar, E. 1946. Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment. Econometrica 14: 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostaler, G. 1982. Marx et Sraffa. L'Actualité Economique1–2: 95–114.Google Scholar
Dostaler, G. 1986. From Marx to Sraffa. History of Political Economy 18: 463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duménil, G. 1983–84. Beyond the Transformation Riddle: a Labor Theory of Value. Science and Society 47: 427–50.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. 1973. Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dussel, E. 2001. Towards an Unknown Marx: A Commentary on the Manuscripts of 1861–63. London and New York: Routledge.
Eatwell, J. 1987. Competition: Classical Conceptions. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 1: 537–40. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, J. and Panico, C. 1987. Sraffa, Piero (1898–1983). In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 445–51. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebenstein, A. 2001. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ebner, A. 2006. Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship Revisited: Historical Specificity and the Phases of Capitalist Development. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28: 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccarius, J. G. 1866–67. A Working Man's Refutation of Some Points of Political Economy endorsed and advocated by John Stuart Mill, Esq., MP. The Commonwealth. Nos. 192–5, 198, 200, 203–4, 206–11. (10 November 1866–23 March 1867.)Google Scholar
Elliott, C. F. 1967. Quis Custodiet Sacra? Problems of Marxist Revisionism. Journal of the History of Ideas 28: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. E. 1976. Marx and contemporary models of socialist economy. History of Political Economy 8: 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. E. 1979. Continuity and change in the evolution of Marx's theory of alienation from the Manuscripts through the Grundrisse to Capital. History of Political Economy 11: 317–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, M. 1987. Fel'dman, Grigorii Alexandrovich, 1884–1958. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P.. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 2: 299–301. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltis, W. 2000. The Classical Theory of Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltis, W. 2001. The French foundations of the classical canon. In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 185–204. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endres, A. M. 1997. Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory: The Founding Austrian Version. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdös, P. 1967. The Application of Marx's Model of Expanded Reproduction to Cycle Theory. Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays presented to Maurice Dobb, 59–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M. 1989. John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx: some problems and perspectives. History of Political Economy 21: 273–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1965. Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, B. 1990. On the composition of capital: a comment on Groll and Orzech. History of Political Economy 22: 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaschel, P. and Semmler, W. 1987. Classical and Neoclassical Competitive Adjustment Processes. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 55: 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. K. 1982. The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power, and the Marxian Transformation Problem. Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. K. 1986. Understanding Capital: Marx's Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, M. W. 1998. Schumpeter on Entrepreneurs and Innovation: A Reappraisal. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdland, T. 1958. The Life of Knut Wicksell. Stockholm: Almquist and Wicksell.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1987. Surplus Approach to Value and Distribution. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 560–74. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1998. Piero Sraffa. In Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. eds. The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics 2: 391–9. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giffen, R. 1904 (1883). The Progress of the Working Classes in the Last Half Century. Economic Inquiries and Studies 1: 382–422. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Gillman, J. M. 1956. The Falling Rate of Profit. New York: Cameron Associates.Google Scholar
Gloria-Palermo, S. 2002. Schumpeter and the old Austrian school: interpretations and influences. In Arena, R. and Dangel-Hagnauer, C. eds. The Contribution of Joseph Schumpeter to Economics: Economic development and institutional change, 21–39. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. 1968. Why Does Marxian Exploitation Theory Require a Labor Theory of Value?Journal of Political Economy 76: 137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottheil, F. M. 1966. Marx's Economic Predictions. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Groll, S. and Orzech, Z. B. 1987. Technical Progress and Values in Marx's Theory of the Decline in the Rate of Profit: an Exetical Approach. History of Political Economy 19: 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberler, G. von. 1958. Prosperity and Depression. A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1939. An Essay in Dynamic Theory. Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1948. Towards a Dynamic Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 1982. The Limits of Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.. 1967 (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von. 1988.The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Bartley, W. W. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von. 1997 (1939). Prices vs. Rationing. In Caldwell, B. ed. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek 10: Socialism, Documents, Reviews, 151–6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. P. 1986. Agency or alienation? Smith, Mill and Marx on the Joint-stock company. History of Political Economy 18: 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1950. A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1973. Capital and Time: A Neo-Austrian Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1965. The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of Du Pont Rayon Plants. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1973. The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1981. Marxian Economics as “General Equilibrium” Theory. History of Political Economy 13: 121–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1984. Marx and Malthusianism: Marx's Secular Path of Wages. American Economic Review 74: 139–51.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1986. Marx and Malthusianism: A Reply to Miguel Ramirez. American Economic Review 76: 548–50.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1991. Marx and the falling rate of profit. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 2: 3–35. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1992. Classical Economics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1995. Ricardo – the New View. Collected Essays I. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1997. The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1998. The Literature of Political Economy: Collected Essays Ⅱ. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1999. Jeremy Bentham and Adam Smith on the usury laws: a “Smithian” reply to Bentham and a new problem. European Journal of Economic Thought 6: 523–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2000. Sraffa and the Interpretation of Ricardo: The Marxian Dimension. History of Political Economy 32: 187–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2001. “Classical Economics.” A reification wrapped in an anachronism? In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 7–26. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2003. Engels-Marx Versus Malthus on Distribution and the Population Issue. In Hum, D. ed. Faith, Reason, and Economics: Essays in Honour of Anthony Waterman, 135–52. Winnipeg: St. John's College Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 2004. Economic Organization, Distribution and the Equality Issue: The Marx-Engels Perspective. Review of Austrian Economics 17: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 2005. Jean-Baptiste Say and the Classical Canon in Economics: the British Connection in French Classicism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horverak, Ø. 1988. Marx's view of competition and price formation. History of Political Economy 20: 275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. 2000. Review. History of Political Economy 32: 1039–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1985. The Political Economy of Marx. 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1989. A History of Marxian Economics: Volume Ⅰ, 1883–1929. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1992a. A History of Marxian Economics: Volume 2, 1929–1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 1992b. Marx, Jones, Rodbertus and the Theory of Absolute Rent. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. 2001. Where Marx was right: towards a more secure foundation for heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25: 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. K. and Glick, M. 1987. Transformation Problem. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 688–91. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Husami, Z. 1978. Marx on Distributive Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8: 27–64.Google Scholar
Indart, G. 1990. The Formation and Transformation of Market Value. History of Political Economy 22: 721–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, M. 1976. A Study of Marx's Theory of Value. Science and Society 40: 307–40.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1883 (1868). Trades Societies: Their Objects and Policy. Methods of Social Reform and Other Papers, 101–21. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1910 (1882). The State in Relation to Labour. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. 1969. The “Last Hour” of Senior and Marx. History of Political Economy 2: 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. 1976. An Introduction to Modern Theories of Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Judt, T. 2006. Review. The New York Review of Books 53(14): 88–92.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1954. The Relation of Economic Growth and Cyclical Fluctuations. Economic Journal 64: 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayali, R. and Sari, O. 1989. The Winternitz Solution: A Comment. History of Economics Society Bulletin 11: 238–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, J. E. 1979. Marx as an historian of economic thought. History of Political Economy 11: 282–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. and Pomer, M. eds. 2001. The New Russia: Transition Gone Astray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1942. Profit and Entrepreneurial Functions. The Journal of Economic History 2: 126–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1964 (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Kurz, H. D. 1979. Review of Steedman 1977. Australian Economic Papers 18: 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. 1988. Understanding “Classical” Economics: Studies in Long-Period Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. 1940. Schumpeter's Business Cycles. The American Economic Review 30: 257–71.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, O. 1935. Marxian Economics and Modern Economic Theory. Review of Economic Studies. 2: 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, R. N. 2003. Schumpeter and the obsolescence of the entrepreneur. In Koppl, R. ed. Advances in Austrian Economics 6: Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies, 283–98. Oxford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Lapides, K. 1994. Henryk Grossman on Marx's Wage Theory and the “Increasing Misery” Controversy. History of Political Economy 26: 239–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapides, K. 1998. Marx's Wage Theory in Historical Perspective: Its Origins, Development and Interpretation. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. 1983. Some strengths in Marx's disequilibrium theory of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 7: 55–68.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, M. A. 2003. Beyond “Capital”: Marx's Political Economy of the Working Class. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. 1966 (1938). The significance of Marxian economics for present-day economic theory. Essays in Economics: Theories and Theorizing, 72–83. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. 1934–35a. Economic Theory and Socialist Economy. Review of Economic Studies 2: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, A. 1934–35b. A Rejoinder to Dobb. Review of Economic Studies 2: 152–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, N. 1975. The Tragic Deception: Marx Contra Engels. Oxford: Clio Books.Google Scholar
Lipietz, A. 1982. The So-Called “Transformation Problem” Revisited. Journal of Economic Theory 26: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longfield, M. 1834. Lectures on Political Economy. Dublin: Richard Milliken and Son.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, R. 1951 (1913). The Accumulation of Capital. New York and London: Modern Reader Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. 1963. Essays in Economic Semantics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1962. Traité d'économie marxiste. Paris: René Julliard.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1971. The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx: 1843 to Capital. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mangoldt, H. K. E. von. 1855. Die Lehre vom Unternehmergewinn: ein Beitrag zur Volkswirtschaftslehre. Leipzig: Teuber.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics 8th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
März, E. 1991. Joseph Schumpeter: Scholar, Teacher and Politician. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, E. S. 1957. Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. C. O. 1959. The Business Cycle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McLellan, D. 1970. On the Importance of the “Grundrisse.” Encounter 35: 34–45.Google Scholar
McLellan, D. 1973. Karl Marx. His Life and Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meade, J. E. 1968. The Growing Economy: Principles of Political Economy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Medio, A. 1972. Profits and Surplus-Value. Appearance and Reality in Capitalist Production. In Hunt, E. K. and Schwartz, J. G. eds. A Critique of Economic Theory, 312–46. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1962. The Economics of Physiocracy: Essays and Translations. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1967. Economics and Ideology and Other Essays: Studies in the Development of Economic Thought. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1975. Introduction, Studies in the Labor Theory of Value. 2nd ed. ⅰ–ⅹⅼⅳ. London and New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1826). Paper Currency and Commercial Distress. Collected Works 4: 71–123. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1836). Civilization. Collected Works 18: 116–47. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1844). Of the Influence of Consumption on Production. Essay Ⅱ in Essays on Some Unsettled Questions in Political Economy. Collected Works 4: 262–79. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 (1848). Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. (1st ed. 1848, 7th ed. 1871.) Collected Works 2–3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1963–91 [1879]. Chapters on Socialism. Collected Works 5. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von. 1947. Planned Chaos. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von. 1980 [1950]. Planning for Freedom. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. and Catephores, G. 1975. Is There an Historical Transformation Problem?Economic Journal 85: 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, F. ed. 2005. Marx's theory of money: modern appraisals. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L. S. 1979. Professor Hollander and Ricardian Economics. Eastern Economic Journal 5: 501–12.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. 1999. Marx's Concept of Money: The god of commodities. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikaido, H. 1983. Marx on competition. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 43: 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1976. Two Notes on Marx and the “Transformation Problem.” Economica 43: 411–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1979. Aspects of Marx's Grundrisse as Intellectual Foundations for a Major Theme of Capital. History of Political Economy 11: 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1983. The Making of Marx's Critical Theory: A Bibliographical Analysis. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. 1984. Marx's Critique of Political Economy: Intellectual Sources and Evolution 1. 1844 to 1860. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. 1985. Marx's Critique of Political Economy: Intellectual Sources and Evolution 2. 1861 to 1863. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1981. Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo. Oxford Economic Papers 33: 352–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 2004. The Classical Economists Revisited. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. and Darnell, A. C. 1982. Authorship Puzzles in the History of Economics: A Statistical Approach. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, N. P. 1980. Marx's Classical and Post-Classical Conceptions of the Wage. Australian Economic Papers 19: 264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orzech, Z. B. and Groll, S. 1989. Stages in the development of a Marxian concept: the composition of capital. History of Political Economy 21: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overstone, Lord. 1856. Speech on Limited Liability. Hansard. 3rd series. ⅭⅩⅬⅠ. 139–43. 14 March.
Overstone, Lord. 1971. Correspondence. O'Brien, D. P. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patinkin, D. 1981. Essays on and In the Chicago Tradition. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, P. L. 1978. Industrial Entrepreneurship and Management in Great Britain. In Mathias, P. and Postan, M. M. eds. The Cambridge Economic History of Europe 7: 180–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perelman, M. 1985. Marx, Malthus and the organic composition of capital. History of Political Economy 17: 461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorni, D. 1985. Karl Marx and General Equilibrium. History of Political Economy 17: 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1983 (1945). Marx's Theory of the State. In Miller, D. ed. A Pocket Popper, 326–37. Oxford: Fontana.Google Scholar
Porta, P. L. 2001. Sraffa's Ricardo after fifty years. In Forget, E. L. and Peart, S. eds. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, 241–69. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potier, J. P. 1991. Piero Sraffa. Unorthodox Economist, 1898–1983. A Biographical Essay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pullen, J. M. 1989. In defence of Senior's last hour-and-twenty-five-minutes. History of Political Economy 21: 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainelli, M. 1983. Entrepreneur et Profits Dans les “Principles” de John Stuart Mill et d'Alfred Marshall. Revue Economique 34: 794–810.Google Scholar
Ramirez, M. D. 1986. Marx and Malthusianism: Comment. American Economic Review 76: 543–7.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1835 (1819). Des Principes de l'Économie Politique et de l'Impôt … traduit de l'anglais par F. S. Constancio … avec des notes explicatives et critiques par Jean-Baptiste Say. Bruxelles: H. Dumont.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–73. Principles of Political Economy. Works and Correspondence. Vol. 1. Sraffa, P. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–73 (1820). Notes on Malthus's Principles of Political Economy. Works and Correspondence. Vol. 2. Sraffa, P. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lord. 1979. Against Inflation: Speeches in the Second Chamber 1965–1977. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lord 1998. A History of Economic Thought: The LSE Lectures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. H. 1915. A Study of Business Fluctuation. London: P.S. King.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1951. Introduction to Rosa Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital, 13–28. New York and London: Modern Reader Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1967 (1942). An Essay on Marxian Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1948). Marx and Keynes. Collected Economic Papers 1: 133–45. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1955). Marx, Marshall and Keynes. Collected Economic Papers 2: 1–17. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1968). Economics versus Political Economy. Collected Economic Papers 4: 25–32. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1980 (1978). Formalism Versus Dogma. Collected Economic Papers 5: 275–9. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E. 1983. Exploitation, class and property relations. In Ball, T. and Farr, J. eds. After Marx, 184–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1982. Hollander's Ricardo. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 4: 339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1998. Piero Sraffa as an Interpreter of the Classical Economists. In Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. eds. The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics 2: 399–404. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosdolsky, R. 1980. The Making of Marx's “Capital”. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1974. Karl Marx on the Economic Role of Science. Journal of Political Economy 82: 713–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1976. Marx as a student of technology. Monthly Review 28: 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1991. Marx wasn't all wrong. Scientific American. December: 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1994. Exploring the Black Box: Technology, economics and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubel, M. 1963. ed. Oeuvres de Karl Marx. Économie I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rubel, M. 1968. ed. Oeuvres de Karl Marx. Économie Ⅱ. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rubel, M. 1982. ed. Oeuvres de Karl Marx. Philosophie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L. and Wolfson, M. 1986. Expository Marxism and comparative economic dynamics. History of Political Economy 18: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1957. Wages and Interest: A Modern Dissection of Marxian Economic Models. American Economic Review 47: 341–69.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1961. Abstract of a Theorem Concerning Substitutability in Open Leontief Models. In Koopmans, T. C., ed. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, 142–6. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1967. Marxian Economics as Economics. American Economic Review 57: 616–23.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1971. Understanding the Marxian Theory of Exploitation: a Summary of the So-called Transformation Problem. Journal of Economic Literature 9: 399–431.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1978. The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy. Journal of Economic Literature 16: 1415–34.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1987. Sraffian Economics. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 4: 452–61 London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1990. Revisionist Findings on Sraffa. In Bharadwaj, K. and Schefold, B. eds. Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, 263–80. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1991a. Logic of the Historical Transformation Problem: Exchange Ratios under Simple Commodity Production. In Caravale, G. A. ed. Marx and Modern Economic Analysis 1: 145–68. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1991b. Conversations with my History of Economics Critics. In Shaw, G. K. ed. Economics, Culture and Education: Essays in Honour of Mark Blaug, 3–13. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1992. Marx on Rent: A Failure to Transform Correctly. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 2000. Revisionist findings on Sraffa. In Kurz, H. D. ed. Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics, 25–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardoni, C. 1986. Marx and Keynes on effective demand and unemployment. History of Political Economy 18: 419–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefold, B. 1976. Different Forms of Technical Progress. Economic Journal 86: 806–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefold, B. 1996. Piero Sraffa, 1898–1983. Economic Journal 106: 1314–25.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1952. Ten Great Economists: From Marx to Keynes. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1959 [1926]. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 2003 (1928). Entrepreneur. (Translated by M. C. Becker and T. Knudsen.) In Koppl, R. ed. Advances in Austrian Economics 6: Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies, 235–65. Oxford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Seccombe, W. 1983. Marxism and Demography. New Left Review 137: 22–47.Google Scholar
Semmler, W. 1984. Marx and Schumpeter on Competition, Transient Surplus Profit and Technical Change. Economie appliquée 37: 419–55.Google Scholar
Semmler, W. 1987. Competition: marxian conceptions. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 1: 540–2. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, N. 1837. Letters on the Factory Acts as it affects the Cotton Manufacture. London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar
Service, R. 2000. Lenin: A Biography. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seton, F. 1976 (1957). The “Transformation Problem.” In Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. eds. The Economics of Marx, 162–76. Harmondworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A. 1954 (1931). The Coming of General Limited Liability. In Carus-Wilson, E. M. ed. Essays in Economic History 1: 358–79. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A. 1954 (1933). The Limited Companies of 1866–1883. In Carus-Wilson, E. M. ed. Essays in Economic History 1: 380–405. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sinha, A. 1997. The Transformation Problem: A Critique of the “New Solution.” Review of Radical Political Economics 29: 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A. 1998. Hollander's Marx and Malthusianism: A Critique. The History of Economics Review (Australia) 29: 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A. 2001. Review. Review of Radical Political Economics 33: 241–4.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. C. L. Simonde. 1951. Nouveaux Principes d'Économie Politique. 3rd ed. Genève & Paris: Edition Jeheber.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1937 (1776). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 1960. Marx's “Increasing Misery” Doctrine. American Economic Review 50: 111–20.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 1967. Marx's Capital After One Hundred Years. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 33: 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowell, T. 1980. Knowledge and Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 2006. On Classical Economics. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. Papers. Wren Library. Trinity College. Cambridge.
Sraffa, P. 1926. The Laws of Return under Competitive Conditions. Economic Journal 36: 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1951. Introduction to vol. 1 of Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ⅶ–ⅼⅻ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1960. The Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 1987. Engels, Friedrich. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics 2: 144–6. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. 1982. Marx on Ricardo. In Bradley, I. and Howard, M. eds. Classical and Marxian Political Economy: Essays in Honor of Ronald L. Meek, 115–56. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1995. Comment on Brewer 1995. History of Political Economy 27: 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1965. Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1968. Marx and the Industrial Revolution. In Eagly, R. V. ed. Events, Ideology and Economic Theory: the Determinants of Progress in the Development of Economic Analysis, 107–19. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1981. Marxian Value Theory and Crises. In Steedman, I.The Value Controversy, 20–35. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. M. 1987 (1973). Some Problems in the Theory of Capital Accumulation. International Journal of Political Economy 17: 38–53.Google Scholar
Tomass, M. 1998. On the Relativist Fallacy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, K. 1974. Remarks on the Theoretical Significance of Marx's Grundrisse. Economy and Society 3: 180–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, G. S. L. 1961. Ricardo and Marx. Economica 28: 252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, J. 1931 (1757). Instructions for Travellers. In Schuyler, R. L. ed. Josiah Tucker: A Selection of his Economic and Political Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. C. 1969. The Marxian Revolutionary Idea. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. C. 1972. Ed. The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tuttle, C. A. 1927. The Entrepreneur Function in Economic Literature. The Journal of Political Economy 35: 501–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. 2005. Incommensurability, Ecology, and Planning. History of Political Economy 37: 309–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, K. 1998. Review of Caldwell 1997. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 235–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walras, L. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics. Jaffé, W. ed. 4th definitive ed. 1926. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1998. Reappraisal of “Malthus the Economist,” 1933–97. History of Political Economy 30: 293–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1995. Editor's introduction to minisymposium: Locating Marx After the Fall. History of Political Economy 27: 109–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E. G. 1983. Marx's Hypotheses on the Length of the Working Day. Journal of Political Economy 91: 266–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 2003. Alfred Marshall's Principles and Industry and Trade: Two Books or One? Marshall and the Joint Stock Company. In Arena, R. and Quéré, M. eds. The Economics of Alfred Marshall: Revisiting Marshall's Legacy, 137–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williams, P. L. 1982. Monopoly and centralization in Marx. History of Political Economy 14: 228–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, E. N. 1979. The Rate of Surplus Value, the Organic Composition and the General Rate of Profit in the U.S. Economy, 1947–67. American Economic Review 69: 329–41.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M. 1966. A Reappraisal of Marxian Economics. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M. 1979. Three Stages in Marx's Thought. History of Political Economy 11: 117–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. 1972. The Marxian Critique of Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 244–82.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Samuel Hollander, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
  • Book: The Economics of Karl Marx
  • Online publication: 25 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510663.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Samuel Hollander, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
  • Book: The Economics of Karl Marx
  • Online publication: 25 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510663.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Samuel Hollander, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
  • Book: The Economics of Karl Marx
  • Online publication: 25 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510663.020
Available formats
×