Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T15:19:15.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Dynamics of Bacterial Biofilm Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Hilary M. Lappin-Scott
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
J. William Costerton
Affiliation:
Montana State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Biofilm formation is important in a wide variety of situations: for instance, colonization of pipe surfaces in the food and water industries, metal corrosion due to sulphate reducing bacteria in the shipping and oil industries, and in medicine associated with infections of various tissues (osteomeylitis and endocarditis), dental decay (Addy et al. 1992) and prosthetic implants (Dougherty 1988). Whereas biofilm formation in a chemostat is considered merely an operating nuisance (Bryers 1984), in industrial fermentors such fouling can cause physical damage by the production of metabolites at points on the surface. Biofilms may lead to reduced heat efficiency transfer and reduction in flow rates, and can also act as a resevoir for potential pathogens (Lappin-Scott & Costerton 1989).

Although biofilm formation is frequently associated with being harmful and detrimental, in many instances it can also be beneficial. Biofilms are used in wastewater treatment for the degradation of soluble organic or nitrogenous waste. In nature microbial decomposition of cellulose fibres requires prior attachment of cellulolytic bacteria and Rhizobium cells form biofilms on the roots of leguminous plants where nodules are formed to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Bar-Or (1990) stated the importance of biofilms in stabilizing soil either by acting as cementing agents or flocculating soil particles, thereby improving aeration and water percolation and allowing further microbial growth.

Biofilm formation is difficult to control. A number of authors have reported that biofilm bacteria (sessile) are more resistant to antimicrobial agents than suspended bacteria (planktonic) of the same species (Brown et al. 1988; Anwar et al. 1989). Most commercial biocides and antibiotics were developed and tested for their ability to kill planktonic bacteria (Chopra 1986; Gilbert et al. 1987).

Type
Chapter
Information
Microbial Biofilms , pp. 46 - 63
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×