Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:27:09.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - The elderly with schizophrenia

from Part 7 - Schizophrenia and related psychoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2009

Edmond Chiu
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
David Ames
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Historical developments

Several factors have contributed to a growing interest and concern for elderly individuals with a history of schizophrenia. Demographic changes in an aging society as well as the reduced hospital mortality of schizophrenic patients, once at a very high risk especially for tuberculosis, have enabled an increasing number of these persons to become of age. Due to more active strategies in treatment and rehabilitation, such as effective control of productive symptomatology by antipsychotic medication as well as the provision of outpatient and complementary facilities, the duration of inpatient stay has dramatically decreased. Thus, individuals with a history of schizophrenia have become more visible in the community. Extensive long-term follow-up research has revitalized therapeutic activity and optimism even for the chronically hospitalized, because the outcome of schizophrenia was found to be more favorable than expected. ‘It is worth trying to help schizophrenics’ (Bleuler, 1974) once thought to suffer from a disease process inevitably leading to dementia.

Epidemiology of the elderly with schizophrenia

The incidence of schizophrenia in the elderly (i.e. onset of the disorder after age 65) is considered to approximate zero if the frequent paranoid states in the elderly, organic psychoses and similar delusional disorders without first-rank symptoms of schizophrenia are carefully ruled out (Bleuler, 1972; Huber, Gross & Schüttler, 1979).

Community studies on the prevalence of schizophrenia among the elderly (Krauss, 1989) have found rates ranging from 0.1% to 1.7%. For an overall estimate of the prevalence, some of these figures are possibly too low, because many chronic patients live quite adapted in homes and most prevalence studies did not include individuals in residential care.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×