Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:48:08.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - A comparative perspective on the ontogeny of flight muscles in bats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Rick A. Adams
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Whitewater
Scott C. Pedersen
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Flight muscles, and the pectoralis muscle in particular, are the ‘motors’ behind flight in bats. Whereas the locomotory muscles of most mammals are composed of multiple fiber types (discussed below) which facilitate different kinds of movements (slow versus fast movements, for example), the flight muscles of several bats have been classified as either unitypic or bitypic (Hermanson & Foehring 1988; Hermanson 1998). For example, in the unitypic condition, the pectoralis muscle is made of only a single (fast-twitch) fiber type and is highly specialized for a specific pattern of contraction. In contrast, bats with bitypic muscles have pectoralis muscles containing two fiber types which are both presumably fasttwitch, but which probably differ in underlying metabolic specializations. These observations about the pectoralis can be extended to other muscles in the shoulder girdle, most notably the serratus anterior (‘serratus ventralis’ of Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria 1994), subscapularis, and short head of biceps brachii. Inclusion of these muscles as primary downstroke muscles was hypothesized by Vaughan (1959) based on his careful dissection studies of bats, and was substantiated by histochemical (Foehring & Hermanson 1984; Hermanson & Foehring 1988; and others) and electromyographic studies of these muscles (Hermanson & Altenbach 1981, 1985; Altenbach & Hermanson 1987). Most studies of bat flight muscles and anatomy were based on analysis of adult specimens. Thus, it is not surprising that we have learned little about the normal ontogeny of bat muscles and about the problems faced by growing bats, nor about the comparative ecology of juvenile bats from different chiropteran species.

A large body of literature exists about the normal ontogeny of locomotory muscles of terrestrial mammals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×