Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:41:35.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Sex ratio distorters and their detection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Richard Stouthamer
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, USA
Gregory D.D. Hurst
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University College London, United Kingdom
Johannes A.J. Breeuwer
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Summary

Sex ratio distorters (SRDs) are heritable elements that modify the sex ratio of their host to promote their own transmission. In this chapter we examine various theories relating to the evolutionary importance of SRDs, give an overview of the various classes of SRDs and methods of how to discover them in the field, and outline areas of current contention, and thus future work in relation to their incidence and importance. Sex ratio distorters include organelles, heritable bacteria and eukaryotes, B chromosomes and meiotic-drive sex chromosomes. A high proportion of arthropod species that have been studied in detail harbour SRDs. They are important in host evolution because they influence fundamental population dynamic processes, manipulate sex-determining mechanisms of their host and may contribute to genetic isolation between host populations. If SRDs are parasitic, selection may promote the spread of host genes to prevent SRD action and transmission. Unusual sex ratio phenotypes in the field may indicate SRDs. This should be followed by genetic analysis of sex ratio phenotypes of isofemale lines. If micro-organisms are suspected, they can be identified molecularly with specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primer pairs and sequence analysis.

Introduction

What are sex ratio distorters (SRDs)? SRDs are broadly defined as those heritable elements that modify the sex ratio of their host to promote their own transmission, often at a cost to the inclusive fitness of the individual bearing them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 195 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, M D, Vossbrinck, C R, Didier, E S, Maddox, J V & Shadduck, J A (1995) Small subunit ribosomal DNA phylogeny of various microsporidia with emphasis on AIDS related forms. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 42, 564–570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beukeboom, L W & Werren, J H (1992) Population genetics of a parasitic chromosome: experimental analysis of PSR in subdivided populations. Evolution, 46, 1257–1268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beukeboom, L W & Werren, J H (1993) Deletion analysis of the selfish B-chromosome, Paternal sex ratio (PSR), in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics, 133, 637–648Google Scholar
Bouchon, D, Rigaud, T & Juchault, P (1998) Evidence for widespread Wolbachia infection in isopod crustaceans: molecular identification and host feminization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 265, 1081–1090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourtzis, K, Nirgianaki, A, Markakis, G & Savakis, C (1996) Wolbachia infection and cytoplasmic incompatbility in Drosophila species. Genetics, 144, 1063–1073Google Scholar
Braig, H R, Zhou, W G, Dobson, S L & O'Neill, S L (1998) Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipienties. Journal of Bacteriology, 180, 2373–2378Google Scholar
Breeuwer, J A J (1997) Wolbachia and cytoplasmic incompatibility in the spider mites Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani. Heredity, 79, 41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeuwer, J A J & Werren, J H (1990) Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature, 346, 558–560CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breeuwer, J A J & Werren, J H (1995) Hybrid breakdown between two haplodiploid species: the role of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes. Evolution, 49, 705–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulnheim, H P (1965) Untersuchungen über Intersexualität bei Gammarus duebeni (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchen, 12, 349–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulnheim, H P & Vávra, J (1968) Infection by the microsporidian Octosporea effeminans sp. n., and its sex determining influence in the amphipod Gammarus duebeni. Journal of Parasitology, 54, 241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaini, G, Riparbelli, M G, Giordano, R & Dallai, R (1996) Mitotic defects associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 67, 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A B & Klazcko, L B (1993) Autosomal suppressors of sex ratio in Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity, 71, 546–551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, A B & Vaz, S C (1999) Are Drosophila SR drive chromosomes always balanced?Heredity, 83, 221–228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, A B, Vaz, S C & Klazcko, L B (1997) Polymorphism for Y-linked suppressors of sex-ratio in two natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata. Genetics, 146, 891–902Google ScholarPubMed
Charlat, S & Merçot, H (2000) Wolbachia trends. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 438–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L M & Tooby, J (1981) Cytoplasmatic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 89, 83–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, S L & Tanouye, M A (1998) Interspecific movement of the paternal sex ratio chromosome. Heredity, 81, 261–269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doncaster, L (1913) On an inherited tendency to produce purely female families in Abraxus glossurlariata, and its relation to an abnormal chromosome number. Journal of Genetics, 3, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doncaster, L (1914) On the relations between chromosomes, sex limited transmission and sex determination in Abraxux glossulariata. Journal of Genetics, 4, 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doncaster, L (1922) Further observations on chromosome and sex determination in Abraxus glossulariata. Quarterly Journal of Microscopic Sciences, 66, 397–408Google Scholar
Dunn, A M, Adams, J & Smith, J E (1993) Transovarial transmission and sex ratio distortion by a microsporidian parasite in a shrimp. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 61, 248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W G (1980) Evolutionary consequences of intracellular organelle competition. Quarterly Review of Biology, 55, 231–249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eickbush, D G, Eickbush, T H & Werren, J H (1992) Molecular characterization of repetitive DNA sequences from a B-chromosome. Chromosoma, 101, 575–583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanders, S E (1943) The role of mating in the reproduction of parasitic Hymenoptera. Journal of Economic Entomology, 36, 802–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S A (1989) The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. American Naturalist, 133, 345–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S A (1991) Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution, 45, 262–267Google ScholarPubMed
Fredga, K, Gropp, A, Winking, H & Frank, F (1976) Fertile XX- and XY-type females in the wood lemming Myopus schisticolor. Nature, 261, 225–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershenson, S (1928) A new sex ratio abnormality in Drosophila obscura. Genetics, 13, 488–507Google ScholarPubMed
Ginsberger-Vogel, T, Carre-Lecuyer, M C & Fried-Montafier, M C (1980) Transmission expérimentale de la thélygenie liée a l'intersexualité chez Orchestia gammarellus (Pallas): analyse des génotypes sexuels dans la descendance des femelles normales transformes en femelles thélygenes. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 122, 261–270Google Scholar
Hackett, K J, Lynn, D E, Williamson, D L, Ginsberg, A S & Whitcomb, R F (1986) Cultivation of the Drosophila spiroplasma. Science, 232, 1253–1255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haig, D & Bergstrom, C T (1995) Multiple mating, sperm competition and meiotic drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J B S (1922) Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics, 12, 101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W D (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatcher, M J, Taneyhill, D E, Dunn, A M & Tofts, C (1999) Population dynamics under parasitic sex ratio distortion. Theoretical Population Biology, 56, 11–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, W A & Craig, G B J (1966) Genetic distortion of sex ratio in a mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Genetics, 53, 1177–1196Google Scholar
Holden, P E, Brookfield, J F Y & Jones, P (1993) Cloning and characterization of anftsZ homologue from a bacterial symbiont of Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular and General Genetics, 240, 213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huigens, M E, Luck, R F, Klaassen, R H G, Maas, M F P M, Timmermans, M J T N & Stouthamer, R (2000) Infectious parthenogenesis. Nature, 405, 178–179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, M S, Nur, U & Werren, J H (1993) Origin of males by genome loss in an autoparasitoid wasp. Heredity, 70, 162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D (1997) Wolbachia, cytoplasmic incompatibility, and the evolution of eusociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 184, 99–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D & McVean, G A T (1998) Parasitic male-killing bacteria and the evolution of clutch size. Ecological Entomology, 23, 350–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D & Schilthuizen, M (1998) Selfish genetic elements and speciation. Heredity, 80, 2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D, Hammarton, T C, Obrycki, J J, Majerus, T M O, Walker, L E, Bertrand, D & Majerus, M E N (1996) Male-killing bacterium in the fifth ladybird beetle, Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae). Hereditary, 77, 177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst GDD, Hurst LD & Majerus MEN (1997a) Cytoplasmic sex ratio distorters. In: S L O'Neill, A A Hoffmann & J H Werren (eds) Influential Passengers: Microbes and Invertebrate Reproduction, pp 124–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hurst, G D D, Hammarton, T C, Bandi, C, Majerus, T M O, Bertrand, D & Majerus, M E N (1997b) The diversity of inherited parasites of insects – the male killing agent of the ladybird beetle Coleomegilla maculata is a member of the flavobacteria. Genetical Research, 70, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D, Jiggins, F M, Schulenburg, J H G,, Bertrand, D, West, S A, Goriacheva, I, Zakharov, I A, Werren, J H, Stouthamer, R & Majerus, M E N (1999a) Male-killing Wolbachia in two species of insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 266, 735–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D, Schulenburg, H G,, Majerus, T M O, Bertrand, D, Zakharov, I A, Baungaard, J, Volkl, W, Stouthamer, R & Majerus, M E N (1999b) Invasion of one insect species, Adalia bipunctata, by two different male-killing bacteria. Insect Molecular Biology, 8, 133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, G D D, Bandi, C, Sacchi, L, Cochrane, A, Bertrand, D, Karaca, I & Majerus, M E N (1999c) Adonia variegata(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) bears maternally inherited Flavobacteria that kill males only. Parasitology, 118, 125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, L D (1991) The incidences and evolution of cytoplasmic male killers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 244, 91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, L D (1993) The incidences, mechanisms and evolution of cytoplasmic sex ratio distorters in animals. Biological Reviews, 68, 121–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, L D & Hurst, G D D (1996) Genomic revolutionaries rise up. Nature, 384, 317–318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, L D & Pomiankowski, A N (1991) Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation for Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics, 128, 841–858Google ScholarPubMed
Jaenike, J (1996) Sex-ratio meiotic drive in the Drosophila quinaria group. American Naturalist, 148, 237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenike, J (1999) Suppression of sex-ratio meiotic drive and the maintenance of Y-chromosome polymorphism in Drosophila. Evolution, 53, 164–174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, A C & Jaenike, J (1990) ‘Sex ratio’ meiotic drive in Drosophila testacea. Genetics, 126, 651–656Google Scholar
Jiggins, F M, Hurst, G D D & Majerus, M E N (1998) Sex ratio distortion in Acraea encedon (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) is caused by a male-killing bacterium. Heredity, 81, 87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiggins, F M, Hurst, G D D & Majerus, M E N (1999) How common are meiotically driving sex chromosomes?American Naturalist, 154, 481–483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiggins, F M, Hurst, G D D, Jiggins, C D, Schulenburg, J H G,, Majerus, M E N (2000) The butterfly Danaus chrysippus is infected by a male-killing Spiroplasma bacterium. Parasitology, 120, 439–446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuppeveld, F J M, Logt, J T M, Angulo, A F, Zoest, M J, Quint, W G V, Niesters, H G M, Galama, J M D & Melchers, W J G (1992) Genus- and species-specific identification of mycoplasmas by 16S rRNA amplification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58, 2606–2615Google ScholarPubMed
Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: E Stackebrandt & M Goodfellow (eds) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, pp 115–176. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Lewis, D (1941) Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants: the equilibrium between females and hermaphrodites to be expected with different types of inheritance. New Phytologist, 40, 56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majerus, M E N, Schulenburg, J H G von & Zakharov, I A (2000) Multiple causes of male-killing in a single sample of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from Moscow. Heredity, 84, 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannicacci, D, Couvet, D, Belhassen, E, Gouyon, P H & Atlan, A (1996) Founder effects and sex-ratio in the gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris L. Molecular Ecology, 5, 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, B F (1995) Isolation and characterization of a retroelement from B-chromosome (PSR) in the parasitic waspNasonia vitripennis.Insect Molecular Biology, 4, 253–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllister, B F & Werren, J H (1997) Hybrid origin of a B-chromosome (PSR) in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Chromosoma, 106, 243–253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merçot, H, Atlan, A, Jacques, M & Montchamp-Moreau, C (1995) Sex-ratio distortion in Drosophila simulans: co-occurence of a meiotic driver and a supressor of drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nur, U, Werren, J H, Eickbush, D G, Burke, W D & Eickbush, T H (1988) A selfish B-chromosome that enhances its transmission by eliminating the paternal genome. Science, 240, 512–514CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, S L, Giordano, R, Colbert, A M E, Karr, T L & Robertson, H M (1992) 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 89, 2699–2702CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill S L, Hoffman A A & Werren J H (1997) Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Policansky, D & Ellison, J (1970) Sex ratio in Drosophila pseudoobscura: spermiogenic failure. Science, 169, 888–889CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomiankowski, A & Hurst, L D (1999) Driving sexual preference. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 425–426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presgraves, D C, Severance, E & Wilkinson, G S (1997) Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies. Genetics, 147, 1169–1180Google ScholarPubMed
Reed, K M (1993) Cytogenetic analysis of the paternal sex ratio chromosome of Nasonia vitripennis. Genome, 36, 157–161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, K M & Werren, J H (1995) Induction of paternal genome loss by the paternal-sex-ratio chromosome and cytoplasmic incompatibility bacteria (Wolbachia): a comparative study of early embryonic events. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 40, 408–418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, K M, Beukeboom, L W, Eickbush, D G & Werren, J H (1994) Junctions between repetitive DNAs on the PSR chromosome of Nasonia vitripennis: association of palindromes with recombination. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 38, 352–362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhold, K, Engquist, L, Misof, B & Kurtz, J (1999) Meiotic drive and the evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 266, 1341–1345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigaud T (1997) Inherited microorganisms and sex determination of arthropod hosts. In: S L O'Neill, A A Hoffman & J H Werren (eds) Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganism and Arthropod Reproduction, pp 81–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Rigaud, T & Juchault, P (1992) Genetic control of the vertical transmission of a cytoplasmic sex factor in Armadillidium vulgare. Heredity, 68, 47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigaud, T, Moreau, J & Juchault, P (1999) Wolbachia infection in the terrestrial isopod Oniscus asellus: sex ratio distortion and effect on fecundity. Heredity, 83, 469–475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousset, F, Bouchon, D, Pintureau, B, Juchault, P & Solignac, M (1992) Wolbachia endosymbionts responsible for various alterations of sexuality in arthropods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 250, 91–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, S L & Saul, G B (1968) Post-fertilization effect of incompatibility factors in Mormoniella. Molecular and General Genetics, 103, 29–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, S L, Saul, G B & Conner, G W (1985) Aberrant segregation of R-locus genes in male progeny from incompatible crosses in Mormoniella vitripennis. Journal of Heredity, 76, 21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saumitou-Laprade, P, Cuguen, J & Vernet, P (1994) Cytoplasmic male sterility in plants: molecular evidence and the nucleocytoplasmic conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 431–435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, S W (1982) Maternally-inherited sex ratio in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Science, 215, 1133–1134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, S W (1985) Son-killer: a third extrachromosomal factor affecting sex ratios in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics, 109, 745–754Google Scholar
Skinner, S W (1987) Paternal transmission of an extrachromosomal factor in a wasp. Heredity, 59, 47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D A S, Gordon, I J, Depew, L A & Owen, D F (1998) Genetics of the butterfly Danaus chrysippus (L.) in a broad hybrid zone, with special reference to sex ratio, polymorphism and intragenomic conflict. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 65, 1–40Google Scholar
Stouthamer R (1997) Wolbachia-induced parthenogenesis. In: S L O'Neill, A A Hoffmann & J H Werren (eds) Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction, pp 102–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Stouthamer, R & Kazmer, J D (1994) Cytogenetics of microbe-associated parthenogenesis and its consequences for gene flow in Trichogramma wasps. Heredity, 73, 317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouthamer, R, Luck, R F & Hamilton, W D (1990) Antibiotics cause parthenogenetic Trichogramma to revert to sex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 87, 2424–2427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouthamer, R, Breeuwer, J A J, Luck, R F & Werren, J H (1993) Molecular identification of microorganisms associated with parthenogenesis. Nature, 361, 66–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stouthamer, R, Breeuwer, J A J & Hurst, G D D (1999) Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. Annual Review of Microbiology, 53, 71–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stouthamer R, Tilborg M van, Jong H de, Nunney L & Luck RF (2001) Selfish element maintains sex in natural populations of a parasitoid wasp
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 268, 617–622
Sturtevant, A H & Dobzhansky, T (1936) Geographical distribution and cytology of ‘sex ratio’ in Drosophila pseudoobscura and related species. Genetics, 21, 473–490Google Scholar
Sweeney, A W, Graham, M F & Hazard, E I (1988) Life cycle of Amblyospora dyxenoides sp. nov. in the mosquito Culex annulirostris and the copepodMesocyclops albicans. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 51, 46–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, R S, Dunn, A M & Smith, J E (1997) Cellular distribution of feminizing microsporidian parasite: a strategy for transovarial transmissiom. Parasitology, 115, 157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, R S, Smith, J E, Bouchon, D, Rigaud, T, Duncanson, P, Sharpe, R G & Dunn, A M (1999) Ultrastructural characterisation and molecular taxonomic identification of Nosema granulosis n.sp., a transovariolly transmitted feminising (TTF) microsporidium. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 46, 492–499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uyenoyama, M K & Feldman, M W (1978) The genetics of sex ratio distortion by cytoplasmic infection under maternal and contagious transmission: an epidemiological study. Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 471–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderkerckhove, T T M, Watteyne, S, Willems, A, Swings, J G, Mertens, J & Gillis, M (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rDNA of the cytoplasmic bacterium Wolbachia from the novel host Folosomia candida (Hexapoda, Collembola) and its implications for Wolbachial taxonomy. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 180, 279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavre, F, Allemand, R, Fleury, F, Fouillet, P & Bouletreau, M (1999a) A new cytoplasmic incompatibility type due to Wolbachia in haplodiploid insects. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 35S, 133–135Google Scholar
Vavre, F, Fleury, F, Lepetit, D, Fouillet, P & Boulétreau, M (1999b) Phylogenetic evidence for horizontal transmission of Wolbachia in host-parasitoid associations. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12, 1711–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavre, F, Fleury, F, Varaldi, J, Fouillet, P & Bouletreau, M (2000) Evidence for female mortality in Wolbachia-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility in haplodiploid insects: epidemiologic and evolutionary consequences. Evolution, 54, 191–200Google ScholarPubMed
Weisburg, W G, Barns, S M, Pelletier, D A & Lane, D J (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology, 173, 697–703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werren, J H (1983) Sex ratio evolution under local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Evolution, 37, 116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H (1987) The coevolution of autosomal and cytoplasmic sex ratio factors. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 124, 317–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H (1991) The paternal-sex-ratio chromsome of Nasonia. American Naturalist, 137, 392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H (1997) Biology of Wolbachia.Annual Review of Entomology, 42, 587–609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werren, J H & Beukeboom, L W (1993) Population genetics of a parasitic chromosome: theoretical analysis of PSR in subdivided populations. American Naturalist, 142, 224–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werren, J H, Skinner, S W & Charnov, E L (1981) Paternal inheritance of a daughterless sex ratio factor. Nature, 293, 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H, Skinner, S W & Huger, A M (1986) Male-killing bacteria in a parasitic wasp. Science, 231, 990–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H, Nur, U & Eickbush, D (1987) An extrachromosomal factor causing loss of paternal chromosomes. Nature, 327, 75–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werren, J H, Nur, U & Wu, C I (1988) Selfish genetic elements. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 297–302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werren, J H, Hurst, G D D, Zhang, W, Breeuwer, J A J, Stouthamer, R & Majerus, M E N (1994) Rickettsial relative associated with male killing in the ladybird beetle (Adalia bipunctata). Journal of Bacteriology, 176, 388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H, Zhang, W & Guo, L R (1995) Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia: reproductive parasites of arthropods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 261, 55–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, S A, Cook, J M, Werren, J H & Godfray, H C J (1998) Wolbachia in two insect host-parasitoid communities. Molecular Ecology, 7, 1457–1465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, G S, Presgraves, D C & Crymes, L (1998) Male eye span in stalk eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature, 391, 277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S G, Sacci, J B J, Schriefer, M E, Anderson, E M, Fujioka, K K, Sorvillo, F J, Barr, A R & Azad, A F (1992) Typhus and typhus-like rickettsiae associated with opposums and their fleas in Los Angeles. Journal Clinical Microbiology, 30, 1758–1762Google Scholar
Wood, R J & Newton, M E (1991) Sex-ratio distortion caused by meiotic drive in mosquitoes. American Naturalist, 137, 379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeh, J A & Zeh, D W (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 263, 1711–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeh, J A & Zeh, D W (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 264, 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×