Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:26:22.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Nontrophic, indirect interaction webs of herbivorous insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since ecological communities are structured by species interactions, an understanding of trophic interactions has been a central issue in ecology (Paine 1980, Hunter and Price 1992, Polis and Winemiller 1996, Borer et al. 2002, Berlow et al. 2004). In terrestrial systems predation has a lethal effect on prey. On the other hand, mature plants are rarely killed by herbivores, but herbivory can subsequently change plant traits such as allelochemistry, cell structure and growth, physiology, morphology, and phenology. There is increasing appreciation that such herbivore-induced responses of plants are common and widespread in natural and agricultural systems (Karban and Baldwin 1997). Since plant-based arthropod communities consist of many herbivores interacting with a host plant, the herbivore-induced plant responses have the potential to greatly influence the formation of arthropod community by indirectly linking major herbivore species via nontrophic linkages. In this context, I use the term “nontrophic” to refer to “without direct feeding relationship” in this chapter. Since a primary focus of previous studies of trophic dynamics has been on determining how the relative abundance of biomass or energy produced by one trophic level is transferred to another (Oksanen et al. 1981, Cyr and Pace 1993, Leibold et al. 1997), community consequences of ubiquitous nontrophic and indirect interactions in plant–herbivore systems have long been overlooked.

This chapter addresses the importance of herbivore-induced plant responses as a creator of nontrophic interactions among herbivores and indirect interactions involving herbivores and their host plants, and incorporates nontrophic and indirect links into plant-based terrestrial food webs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Communities
Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs
, pp. 221 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. A., B. A. Menge, G. G. Mittelbach, D. A. Spiller, and P. Yodzis. 1996. The role of indirect effects in food webs, pp. 371–395 in Polis, G. A. and Winemiller, K. O. (eds.) Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, A. A., and Zandt, P. A.. 2003. Ecological play in the coevolutionary theatre: genetic and environmental determinants of attack by a specialist weevil on milkweed. Journal of Ecology 91:1049–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., Wardle, D. A., and Yeates, G. W.. 1998. Linking above-ground and below-ground interactions: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil organisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30:1867–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazely, D. R., Myers, J. H., and Silva, K. B. da. 1991. The response of numbers of bramble prickles to herbivory and depressed resource availability. Oikos 61:327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., and Pitelka, L. F.. 1987. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience 37:58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlow, E. L., Neutel, A. M., Cohen, J. E., et al. 2004. Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolker, B., Holyoak, M., Krivan, V., Rowe, L., and Schmitz, O.. 2003. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsall, M. B., and Hassell, M. P.. 1997. Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages. Nature 388:371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, E. T., Anderson, K., Blanchette, C. A., et al. 2002. Topological approaches to food web analyses: a few modifications may improve our insights. Oikos 99:397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, J. F., Stachowicz, J. J., and Bertness, M. D.. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R. M., Pennings, S. C., and Richards, C. L.. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappuccino, N. 1993. Mutual use of leaf-shelters by lepidopteran larvae on paper birch. Ecological Entomology 18:287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Palmer, M. A., and Collins, S. L.. 2002. Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415:426–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P., and Chapin, F. S. I.. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, J. H. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist 122:661–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constabel, C. P. 1999. A survey of herbivore-inducible defensive proteins and phytochemicals, pp. 137–166 in Agrawal, A. A., Tuzun, S., and Bent, E. (eds.) Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
Craig, T. P., and Ohgushi, T.. 2002. Preference and performance are correlated in the spittlebug Aphrophora pectoralis on four species of willow. Ecological Entomology 27:529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J. H. 1991. Host-plant mediation of insect mutualisms: variable outcomes in herbivore–ant interactions. Oikos 61:138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyr, H., and Pace, M. L.. 1993. Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 361:148–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalin, P., and Björkman, C.. 2003. Adult beetle grazing induces willow trichome defense against subsequent larval feeding. Oecologia 134:112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damman, H. 1993. Patterns of interaction among herbivore species, pp. 132–169 in Stamp, N. E. and Casey, T. M. (eds.) Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Danell, K., and Huss-Danell, K.. 1985. Feeding by insects and hares on birches earlier affected by moose browsing. Oikos 44:75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, R. F., McClure, M. S., and Ott, J. R.. 1995. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Annual Review of Entomology 40:297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, R. F., Peterson, M. A., Gratton, C., et al. 2000. Feeding-induced changes in plant quality mediate interspecific competition between sap-feeding herbivores. Ecology 81:1814–1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M., and L. E. M. Vet. 1999. Plant–carnivore interactions: consequences for plant, herbivore and carnivore, pp. 483–520 in Olff, H., Brown, V. K., and Drent, R. H. (eds.) Herbivores: Between Plants and Predators. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Dill, L. M., Heithaus, M. R., and Walters, C. J.. 2003. Behaviorally mediated indirect interactions in marine communities and their conservation implications. Ecology 84:1151–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. 1998. Aphid Ecology, 2nd edn. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Faeth, S. H. 1988. Plant-mediated interactions between seasonal herbivores: enough for evolution or coevolution? pp. 391–414 in Spencer, K. C. (ed.) Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Floate, K. D., and Whitham, T. G.. 1994. Aphid–ant interaction reduces chrysomelid herbivory in a cottonwood hybrid zone. Oecologia 97:215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, S. V., and MacGarvin, M.. 1985. The impact of hairy wood ants, Formica lugubris, on the guild structure of herbivorous insects on birch, Betula pubescens. Journal of Animal Ecology 54:847–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, A., Murakami, M., Konno, K., Nakamua, M., and Ohgushi, T.. 2002. A leaf-rolling caterpillar improves leaf quality. Entomological Science 5:263–266.Google Scholar
Gange, A. C., and Brown, V. K.. 1989. Effects of root herbivory by an insect on a foliar-feeding species, mediated through changes in the host plant. Oecologia 81:38–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gange, A. C., and Brown, V. K. (eds.) 1997. Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Gómez, J. M., and Zamora, R.. 2002. Thorns as induced mechanical defense in a long-lived shrub (Hormathophylla spinosa, Cruciferae). Ecology 83:885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., and Slobodkin, L. B.. 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 94:421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S., and Karban, R.. 1986. Effects of an early-season folivorous moth on the success of a later-season species, mediated by a change in the quality of the shared host, Lupinus arboreus Sims. Oecologia 69:354–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haukioja, E., and S. Neuvonen. 1987. Insect population dynamics and induction of plant resistance: the testing of hypotheses, pp. 411–432 in Barbosa, P. and Schultz, J. C. (eds.) Insect Outbreaks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hendrix, S. D., and Trapp, E. J.. 1989. Floral herbivory in Pastinaca sativa: do compensatory responses offset reductions in fitness?Evolution 43:891–895.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, R. D., and Lawton, J. H.. 1994. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D. 1987. Opposing effects of spring defoliation on late season oak caterpillars. Ecological Entomology 12:373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D., and Price, P. W.. 1992. Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732.Google Scholar
Ishihara, M., Hayashi, T., and Ohgushi, T.. 1999. Life cycle of the willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera vericolora (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Ishikari (Hokkaido, Japan). Entomological Science 2:57–60.Google Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Ostfeld, R. S., Richard, M. P., Schauber, E. M., and Wolff, J. O.. 1998. Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and lyme disease risk. Science 279:1023–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagata, H., and Ohgushi, T.. 2004. Leaf miner as a physical ecosystem engineer: secondary use of vacant leaf-mines by other arthropods. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97:923–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R., and Baldwin, I. T.. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R., and Myers, J. H.. 1989. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnick, G. A., Weis, A. E., and Campbell, D. R.. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivore for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80:125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, S., Häggström, H., and Denno, R. F.. 1997. Preference for protected feeding site by larvae of the willow-feeding leaf beetle Galerucella lineola. Ecological Entomology 22:445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H., and Strong, D. R. J.. 1981. Community patterns and competition in folivorous insects. American Naturalist 118:317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S. R. 1993. Early season defoliation of bird cherry influences autumn colonization by the bird cherry aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi. Oikos 66:43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtilä, K., and Strauss, S. Y.. 1997. Leaf damage by herbivores affects attractiveness to pollinators in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 111:396–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Leibold, M. A., Chase, J. M., Shurin, J. B., and Downing, A. L.. 1997. Species turnover and the regulation of trophic structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lill, J. T., and Marquis, R. J.. 2003. Ecosystem engineering by caterpillars increases insect herbivore diversity on white oak. Ecology 84:682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, G. D., Floate, K. D., Waltz, A. M., Wimp, G. M., and Whitham, T. G.. 2000. Positive interactions between leafrollers and other arthropods enhance biodiversity on hybrid cottonwoods. Oecologia 123:82–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maschinski, J., and Whitham, T. G.. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. American Naturalist 134:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J., and V. K. Brown. 1997. Host-plant mediated interactions between spatially separated herbivores: effects on community structure, pp. 217–237 in Gange, A. C. and Brown, V. K. (eds.) Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Mauricio, R., Bowers, M. D., and Bazzaz, F. A.. 1993. Pattern of leaf damage affects fitness of the annual plant Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Ecology 74:2066–2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, K., Hastings, A., and Huxel, G. R.. 1998. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs 65:21–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milewski, A. V., Young, T. P., and Madden, D.. 1991. Thorns as induced defenses: experimental evidence. Oecologia 86:70–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mopper, S., J. Maschinski, N. Cobb, and T. G. Whitham. 1991. A new look at habitat structure: consequences of herbivore-modified plant architecture, pp. 260–280 in Bell, S. S., McCoy, E. D., and Mushinsky, H. R. (eds.) Habitat Structure. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. J., Lewis, O. T., and Godfray, H. C. J.. 2004. Experimental evidence for apparent competition in a tropical forest food web. Nature 428:310–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutikainen, P., and Delph, L. F.. 1996. Effects of herbivory on male reproductive success in plants. Oikos 75:353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. H., and D. Bazely. 1991. Thorns, spines, prickles, and hairs: are they stimulated by herbivory and do they deter herbivores? pp. 325–344 in Tallamy, D. W. and Raupp, M. J. (eds.) Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Myers, J. H., and Post, B. J.. 1981. Plant nitrogen and fluctuations of insect populations: a test with the cinnabar moth – tansy ragwort system. Oecologia 48:151–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, M., and Ohgushi, T.. 2003. Positive and negative effects of leaf shelters on herbivorous insects: linking multiple herbivore species on a willow. Oecologia 136:445–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, M., Miyamoto, Y., and Ohgushi, T.. 2003. Gall initiation enhances the availability of food resources for herbivorous insects. Functional Ecology 17:851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neutel, A. M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., and Ruiter, P. C.. 2002. Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science 296:1120–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nozawa, A., and Ohgushi, T.. 2002. How does spittlebug oviposition affect shoot growth and bud production in two willow species?Ecological Research 17:535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nykänen, H., and Koricheva, J.. 2004. Damage-induced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Oikos 104:247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohgushi, T. 1997. Plant-mediated interactions between herbivorous insects, pp. 115–130 in Abe, T., Levin, S. A., and Higashi, M. (eds.) Biodiversity: An Ecological Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohgushi, T. 2005. Indirect interaction webs: herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J., and Niemelä, P.. 1981. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. American Naturalist 118:240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olff, H., Brown, V. K., and Drent, R. H. (eds.) 1999. Herbivores: Between Plants and Predators. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., and Kitchell, J. F.. 1999. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:483–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paine, R. T. 1980. Food webs: linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. Journal of Animal Ecology 49:667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilson, D. 1992. Aphid distribution and the evolution of goldenrod resistance. Evolution 46:1358–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimm, S. L. 1982. Food Webs. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A. 1999. Why are parts of the world green? Multiple factors control productivity and the distribution of biomass. Oikos 86:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A., Sears, A. L. W., Huxel, G. R., Strong, D. R., and Maron, J.. 2000. When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:473–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polis, G. A., and Winemiller, K. O. (eds.) 1996. Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. E., Tilman, D., Estes, J. A., et al. 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience 46:609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preszler, R. W., and Price, P. W.. 1993. The influence of Salix leaf abscission on leaf-miner survival and life history. Ecological Entomology 18:150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. 2002. Species interactions and the evolution of biodiversity, pp. 3–25 in Herrera, C. M. and Pellmyr, O. (eds.) Plant–Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Pullin, A. S., and Gilbert, J. E.. 1989. The stinging nettle, Urtica dioica, increases trichome density after herbivore and mechanical damage. Oikos 54:275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesada, M., Bollman, K., and Stephenson, A. G.. 1995. Leaf damage decreases pollen production and hinders pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. Ecology 76:437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roininen, H., Price, P. W., and Bryant, J. P.. 1997. Response of galling insects to natural browsing by mammals in Alaska. Oikos 80:481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J., Krivan, V., and Ovadia, O.. 2004. Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters 7:153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122:240–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriber, J. M., and Slansky, F. J.. 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 26:183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, M. L. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. American Naturalist 162:S10–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y. 1991a. Indirect effects in community ecology: their definition, study and importance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y. 1991b. Direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of three native herbivores on a shared host plant. Ecology 72:543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78:1640–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. Y., and Agrawal, A. A.. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y., Conner, J. K., and Rush, S. L.. 1996. Foliar herbivory affects floral characters and plant attractiveness to pollinators: implications for male and female plant fitness. American Naturalist 147:1098–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, D. R. Jr., Simberloff, D., Abele, L. G., and Thistle, A. B. (eds.) 1984. Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. N. 1996. Evolutionary ecology and the conservation of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:300–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474.Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T. 1989. Changes in shoot growth of Phragmites australis caused by the gall maker Giraudiella inclusa (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Oikos 54:370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tscharntke, T., and Hawkins, B. A. (eds.) 2002. Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomi, J., Niemelä, P., Haukioja, E., Siren, S., and Neuvonen, S.. 1984. Nutrient stress: an explanation for plant anti-herbivore responses to defoliation. Oecologia 61:208–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turlings, T. C. J., S. Gouinguené, T. Degen, and M. E. Fritzsche-Hoballah. 2002. The chemical ecology of plant–caterpillar–parasitoid interactions, pp. 148–173 in Tscharntke, T. and Hawkins, B. A. (eds.) Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putten, W. H., Vet, L. E. M., Harvey, J. A., and Wackers, F. L.. 2001. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, D. P., and Simberloff, D.. 2003. Changes in interaction biodiversity induced by an introduced ungulate. Ecology Letters 6:1077–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke, M.. 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37:141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A. 2002. Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., and Peacor, S. D.. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G., and Mopper, S.. 1985. Chronic herbivory: impacts on architecture and sex expression of pinyon pine. Science 228:1089–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitham, T. G., J. Maschinski, K. C. Larson, and K. N. Paige. 1991. Plant responses to herbivory: the continuum from negative to positive and underlying physiological mechanisms, pp. 227–256 in Lewinsohn, T. M., Fernandes, G. W., Benson, W. W., and Price, P. W. (eds.) Plant–Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Williams, A. G., and Whitham, T. G.. 1986. Premature leaf abscission: an induced plant defense against gall aphids. Ecology 67:1619–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. S., and Myers, J. H.. 1984. Previous herbivore attack of red alder may improve food quality for fall webworm larvae. Oecologia 63:166–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimp, G. M., and Whitham, T. G.. 2001. Biodiversity consequences of predation and host-plant hybridization on an aphid–ant mutualism. Ecology 82:440–452.Google Scholar
Wootton, J. T. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worm, B., and Duffy, J. E.. 2003. Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:628–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×