Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:47:33.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Linking ecological and evolutionary change in multitrophic interactions: assessing the evolutionary consequences of herbivore-induced changes in plant traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

David M. Althoff
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho; Contact info:Life Sciences South Rm 252, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3051, Phone: 208.885.9824, Fax: 208.885.7905, e-mail: dalthoff@uidaho.edu
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Much of earth's biodiversity is composed of species that feed upon plants, and in turn these herbivores are the prey base for carnivorous species. Food webs have been characteristically used to describe and examine the direct links among these trophic levels. As a consequence of feeding, however, herbivores cause many morphological and chemical changes in their host plants (Karban and Baldwin 1997, Agrawal et al. 1999). The induced changes that herbivores create indirectly provide new links among trophic levels. These indirect links add an additional level of complexity in understanding not only trait evolution within trophic levels, but also the evolutionary connections among levels within plant–herbivore–carnivore communities. In ecological time, we know that herbivore-induced changes in plants can facilitate indirect interactions such as those between plants and carnivores (Botrell et al. 1998). Parasitoid and predator species modify their searching behavior in response to these changes, and can learn to associate plant changes with herbivore location (Turlings et al. 1993, Vet et al. 1995). The use of herbivore-induced changes has been demonstrated for a number of parasitoid and predator species that attack insect pests of agricultural systems. For example, the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi is more attracted to broad bean plants that are infested with the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Naïve female parasitoids are attracted to plant volatiles that are released as a consequence of aphid feeding (Du et al. 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Communities
Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs
, pp. 354 - 376
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, W. G., and Weis, A. E.. 1997. Evolutionary Ecology across Three Trophic Levels. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, A. A., Tuzun, S., and Bent, E. (eds.) 1999. Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, I. T. 1998. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in natural populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:8113–8118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belshaw, R., and Quicke, D. L. J.. 1997. A molecular phylogeny of the Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconiae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7:281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkett, M. A., Chamberlain, K., Guerrieri, E., et al. 2003. Volatiles from whitefly-infested plants elicit a host-locating response in the parasitoid, Encarsia formosa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:1589–1600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botrell, D. G., Barbosa, P., and Gould, F.. 1998. Manipulating natural enemies by plant variety selection and modification: a realistic strategy?Annual Review of Entomology 43:346–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R. M., Pennings, S. C., and Richards, C. L.. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipollini, D. F. 2002. Variation in the expression of chemical defenses in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae) in the field and common garden. American Journal of Botany 89:1422–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipollini, D. F., Busch, J. W., Stowe, K. A., Simms, E. L., and Bergelson, J.. 2003. Genetic variation and relationships of constitutive and herbivore-induced glucosinolates, trypsin inhibitors, and herbivore resistance in Brassica rapa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:285–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colazza, S., Fucarino, A., Peri, E., et al. 2004. Insect oviposition induces volatile emission in herbaceous plants that attracts egg parasitoids. Journal of Experimental Biology 207:47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constabel, C. P. 1999. A survey of herbivore-induced defensive proteins and phytochemicals, pp. 137–166 in Agrawal, A. A., Tuzun, S., and Bent, E. (eds.) Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
De Moraes, C. M., and Lewis, W. J.. 1999. Analyses of two parasitoids with convergent foraging strategies. Journal of Insect Behavior 12:571–583.Google Scholar
De Moraes, C. M., and Mescher, M. C.. 2004. Biochemical crypsis in the avoidance of natural enemies by an insect herbivore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101:8993–8997.Google Scholar
Dicke, M. 1999. Evolution of induced indirect defense in plants, pp. 62–88 in Tollrain, R. and Harvell, C. D. (eds.) The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dicke, M., and L. E. M. Vet. 1999. Plant–carnivore interactions: evolutionary and ecological consequences for plant, herbivore and carnivore, pp. 483–520 in Olff, H., Brown, V. K., and Drent, R. H. (eds.) Herbivores: Between Plants and Predators. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Du, Y., Poppy, G. M., Powell, W., et al. 1998. Identification of semiochemicals released during aphid feeding that attract parasitoid Aphidius ervi. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24:1355–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Faeth, S. H. 1994. Induced plant responses: effects on parasitoids and other natural enemies of phytophagous insects, pp. 245–260 in Hawkins, B. A. and Sheehan, W. (eds.) Parasitoid Community Ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fritzsche-Hoballah, M. E., and Turlings, T. C. J.. 2001. Experimental evidence that plants under caterpillar attack may benefit from attracting parasitoids. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:533–565.Google Scholar
Fukushima, J., Kainoh, Y., Honda, H., and Takabayashi, J.. 2002. Learning of herbivore-induced and nonspecific plant volatiles by a parasitoid, Cotesia kariyai. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28:579–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geervliet, J. B. F., Vreugdenhill, A. I., Dicke, M., and Vet, L. E. M.. 1998. Learning to discriminate between infochemicals from different plant–host complexes by the parasitoids Cotesia glomerata and C. rubecula. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 86:241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glawe, G. A., Zavala, J. A., Kessler, A., Dam, N. M., and Baldwin, I. T.. 2003. Ecological costs and benefits correlated with trypsin protease inhibitor production in Nicotiana attenuata. Ecology 84:79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H. C. J. 1994. Parasitoids, Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gohole, L. S., Overholt, W. A., Khan, Z. R., and Vet, L. E. M.. 2003. Role of volatiles emitted by host and non-host plants in the foraging behaviour of Dentichasmias busseolae, a pupal parasitoid of the spotted stemborer Chilo partellus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, H., and Dorn, S.. 2000. Genetic variation in behavioral response to herbivore-infested plants in the parasitic wasp Cotesia glomerata (L.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 13:141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrieri, E., Poppy, G. M., Powell, W., Tremblay, E., and Pennacchio, F.. 1999. Induction and systematic release of herbivore-induced plant volatiles mediating in-flight orientation of Aphidius ervi. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25:1247–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. H., and Pagel, M. D.. 1986. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilker, M., and Meiners, T.. 2002. Induction of plant responses to oviposition and feeding by herbivorous insects: a comparison. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 104:181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, A. R. M., Sabelis, M. W., and Bruin, J.. 2002. Evolution of herbivore-induced plant volatiles. Oikos 97:134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R., and Baldwin, I. T.. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, A., and Baldwin, I. T.. 2001 Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291:2141–2144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo Pinto, M., Wajnberg, E., Colazza, S., Curty, C., and Fauvergue, X.. 2004. Olfactory response of two aphid parasitoids, Lysiphlebus testaceipes and Aphidius colemani, to aphid-infested plants from a distance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 110:159–164.Google Scholar
Mäntylä, E., Klemola, T., and Haukioja, E.. 2004. Attraction of willow warblers to sawfly-damaged mountain birches: novel function of inducible plant defences?Ecology Letters 7:915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolies, D. C., Sabelis, M. W., and Boyer, J. E.. 1997. Response of a phytoseiid predator to herbivore-induced plant volatiles: selection on attraction and effect of prey exploitation. Journal of Insect Behavior 10:695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel-Salzat, A., and Whitfield, J. B.. 2004. Preliminary evolutionary relationships within the parasitoid wasp genus Cotesia (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae): combined analysis of four genes. Systematic Entomology 29:371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumm, R., Schrank, K., Wegener, R., Schulz, S., and Hilker, M.. 2003. Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus sylvestris after induction by insect oviposition. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:1235–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neveu, N., Grandgirard, J., Nenon, J. P., and Cortesero, A. M.. 2002. Systemic release of herbivore-induced plant volatiles by turnips infested by concealed root-feeding larvae Delia radicum L. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28:1717–1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oppenheim, S. A., and Gould, F.. 2002. Is attraction fatal? The effects of herbivore-induced plant volatiles on herbivore parasitism. Ecology 83:3416–3425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W., and Wright, A. F.. 1991. The influence of host food plants on host recognition by four aphidiine parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 81:449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W., Pennacchio, F., Poppy, G. M., and Tremblay, E.. 1998. Strategies involved in the location of hosts by the parasitoid Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Biological Control 11:104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roda, A. L., and Baldwin, I. T.. 2003. Molecular technology reveals how the induced direct defenses of plants works. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, C. E., and Weidenmann, R. N.. 1999. Habitat preferences of three congeneric braconid parasitoids: implications for host-range testing in biological control. Biological Control 16:144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M. W., M. A. Janssen, A. Pallini, et al. 1999. Behavioral responses of predatory and herbivorous arthropods to induced plant volatiles: from evolutionary ecology to agricultural applications, pp. 269–296 in Agrawal, A. A., Tuzun, S., and Bent, E. (eds.) Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
Souissi, R., Nenon, J. P., and Ru, B.. 1998. Olfactory responses of parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi to odor of plants, mealybugs, and plant–mealybug complexes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidle, J. L. M., and A, J. J.. van Loon. 2003. Dietary specialization and infochemical use in carnivorous arthropods: testing a concept. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 108:133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. Y., and Irwin, R. E.. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant–animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:435–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabayashi, J., Y. Sato, Horikoshi, M., et al. 1998. Plant effects on parasitoid foraging: differences between two tritrophic systems. Biological Control 11:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, J. S. 1999. Jasmonic acid mediated interactions between plants, herbivores, parasitoids, and pathogens: a review of field experiments in tomato, pp. 319–334 in Agrawal, A. A., Tuzun, S., and Bent, E. (eds.) Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H., and Lewis, W. J.. 1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turlings, T. C. J., F. L. Wäckers, L. E. M. Vet, W. J. Lewis, and J. H. Tumlinson. 1993. Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids, pp. 51–78 in Papaj, D. R. and Lewis, A. C. (eds.) Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J., Alborn, H. T., Loughrin, J. H., and Tumlinson, J. H.. 2000. Volicitin, an elicitor of maize volatiles in the oral secretions of Spodoptera exigua: isolation and bio-activity. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26:189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J., S. Gouinguene, T. Degen, and M. E. Fritzsche-Hoballah. 2002. The chemical ecology of plant–caterpillar–parasitoid interactions, pp. 148–173 in Tscharntke, T. and Hawkins, B. A. (eds.) Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijden, E., and Klinkhamer, P. G. L.. 2000. Conflicting interests of plants and the natural enemies of herbivores. Oikos 89:202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loon, J.J. A., Boer, J. G., and Dicke, M. 2000. Parasitoid–plant mutualism: parasitoid attack of herbivore increases plant reproduction. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97:219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poecke, R. M. P., Posthumus, M. A., and Dicke, M.. 2001. Herbivore-induced volatile production by Arabidopsis thaliana leads to attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula: chemical, behavioral, and gene-expression analysis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27:1911–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poecke, R. M. P., Roosjen, M., Pumarino, L., and Dicke, M.. 2003. Attraction of the specialist parasitoid Cotesia rubecula to Arabidopsis thaliana infested by host or non-host herbivore species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107:229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R. W. H. M., Sommers, A. T. C., Boff, M. I. C.et al. 2001. Plants protect their roots by alerting the enemies of grubs. Ecology Letters 4:292–294.Google Scholar
Zandt, P. A., and Agrawal, A. A.. 2004. Community-wide impacts of herbivore-induced responses in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Ecology 85:2616–2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, T. T., Antolin, M. F., and Bjostad, L. B.. 1996. Behavioral and physiological responses of Diaeretiella rapae to semiochemicals. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 78:187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke., M. 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 37:141–172.
Vet, L. E. M., W. J. Lewis, and R. T. Cardé. 1995. Parasitoid foraging and learning, pp. 65–101 in Cardé, R. T. and Bell, W. J. (eds.) Chemical Ecology of Insects, vol. 2. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Via, S. 1990. Ecological genetics in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annual Review of Entomology 35:421–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q., and Dorn, S.. 2003. Selection on olfactory response to semiochemicals from a host-plant complex in a parasitic wasp. Heredity 91:430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Gu, H., and Dorn, S.. 2004. Genetic relationship between olfactory response and fitness in the Cotesia glomerata (L.). Heredity 92:579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G., Young, W. P., Martinsen, G. D., et al. 2003. Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84:559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, M. J., and Weinberg, A. M.. 2002. Prior flea beetle herbivory affects oviposition preference and larval performance of a potato beetle on their shared host plant. Ecological Entomology 27:115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangerl, A. R. 2003. Evolution of induced plant responses to herbivores. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×