Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:17:03.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Developing the relationship strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2009

Ronan McIvor
Affiliation:
University of Ulster
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the major criticisms of outsourcing is that it is an operational tool and cannot be used as a means of building competitive advantage for an organisation. Proponents of this view argue that any activities sourced from suppliers in the supply market are also available to the competitors of the sourcing organisation. In the past, organisations have only outsourced those activities that were regarded as of peripheral concern to an organisation such as cleaning, catering and security and therefore had little impact upon the competitive position of the organisation. However, organisations are now outsourcing more critical activities such as design, manufacture, marketing, distribution and information systems. As a result of outsourcing more critical activities, organisations have been attempting to develop collaborative relationships with suppliers as they seek to reduce the risks associated with outsourcing. By employing astute relationship management mechanisms it is possible for organisations to leverage the capabilities of suppliers in a more effective way than competing organisations. Organisations are now beginning to recognise the benefits of adopting approaches for managing across and beyond the boundaries of the organisation. There is a growing awareness that competitive advantage can be based as much upon managing beyond the ownership boundaries of the organisation rather than on management within those boundaries. Competitive advantage can be achieved through the cultivation and nurturing of linkages between the sourcing organisation and its key suppliers.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Outsourcing Process
Strategies for Evaluation and Management
, pp. 218 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (1995). Chrysler pushes quality down the supply chain. Purchasing, 13 July, 125–8.
Bensaou, M. (1999). Portfolios of buyer – supplier relationships. Sloan Management Review, 39, No.4, 35–44.Google Scholar
Burnes, B. and New, S. (1996). Understanding supply chain improvement. European Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 2, No.1, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, A., Sanderson, J. and Watson, G. (2000). Wielding influence. Supply Management, 6 April, 30–3.Google Scholar
Crosby, P. (1984). Quality without tears. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cusumano, M. A. (1994). The limits of ‘lean’. Sloan Management Review, 35, No.4, 27–32.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., (1996) How Chrysler created an American keiretsu. Harvard Business Review, 74, No.4, 42–56.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H. and Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. The Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–67.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. L. and Choi, T. Y. (1996). Supplier development: customers as a catalyst for change. Business Horizons, July–August, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handfield, R. B., Krause, D. R., Scannell, T. V. and Monczka, R. M. (2000). Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development. Sloan Management Review, 41, No.2, 37–48.Google Scholar
Hewson, D. (1999). Teamwork with Suppliers. Sunday Times: E-Commerce Supplement: London, 26 March, p. 8.
Hines, P., James, R. and Jones, O. (2000). Supplier Development in Value Stream Management: Strategy and Excellence in the Supply Chain. London: Financial Times: Prentice Hall.
Houlder, V. (1997). Design and production benefit from wired collaboration. Financial Times: Information Technology: Make it on the Internet: Online Manufacturing, 16 July, 34.
Kamath, R. and Liker, J. (1994). A second look at Japanese product development. Harvard Business Review, 74, No.6, 154–70.Google Scholar
Katayama, H. and Bennett, D. (1996). Lean production in a changing competitive world: a Japanese perspective. International Journal of Production and Operations Management, 16, No.2, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply chain management. Harvard Business Review, 61, No.5, 109–17.Google Scholar
Krause, D. R. and Ellram, L. M. (1997). Critical elements of supplier development: the buying-firm perspective. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3, No.1, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. A. (2000). Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Production and Operations Management, 28, No.8, 959–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magretta, J. (1998). The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Harvard Business Review, 76, No.2, 73–84.Google Scholar
Mendez, E. G. and Pearson, J. N. (1994). Purchasing's role in product development: the case for time-based strategies. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30, No.4, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, N. and Hunter, G. (1998). The Financial Impact of ‘Japanese’ Manufacturing Methods, Manufacturing in Transition. London: Routledge.
Oliver, N. and Wilkinson, B. (1992). The Japanisation of British Industry. London: Basil Blackwell.
Pickernell, D. (1997). Less pain but what gain?: a comparison of the effectiveness and effects of Japanese and non-Japanese car assemblers' buyer – supplier relations in the UK automotive industry. OMEGA, 25, No.4, 377–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, M. (1997). Strategic Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. London: Pitman Publishing.
Watts, C. A. and Hahn, C. K. (1993). Supplier development: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29, No.1, 11–17.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Haslam, C., Williams, J., Cutler, T. and Johal, S. (1994). De-constructing car assembler productivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 34, 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K., Haslam, C., Williams, J., Cutler, T., Adcroft, A. and Johal, S. (1992). Against lean production. Economy and Society, 21, No.3, 321–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womack, J. P. and Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean Thinking. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Yasin, M. M., Small, M. and Wafa, M. A. (1997). An empirical investigation of JIT effectiveness: an organisational perspective. OMEGA, 25, No.4, 461–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×