Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:31:26.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Peripheral neuropathy

from Section 3 - Nervous system disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Felicity Reynolds
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor of Obstetric Anaesthesia, St Thomas's Hospital, London, UK
David R. Gambling
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
M. Joanne Douglas
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Robert S. F. McKay
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Peripheral neuropathy takes many forms and may occur as a primary condition or as a component of many diseases with multisystem manifestations. There are manifold etiologies: genetic, inflammatory, traumatic/compressive, metabolic, vasculitic, neoplastic, dietary, toxic/drug-induced. They may be classified as mononeuropathy, plexopathy, multifocal neuropathy (mononeuropathy multiplex), or polyneuropathy. They may affect primarily the cell body and/or the axon (neuropathy, axonopathy), or the myelin sheath (demyelinating neuropathy/neurapraxia). As these categories are confused and confusing, and of little use to the anesthesiologist, a simple etiological classification is used here (Table 11.1).

Neuropathies may affect sensory, motor, or autonomic nerves, or a combination. Longer neurons are usually the most susceptible, so a predominantly distal distribution is common. Signs and symptoms may include muscle weakness and wasting, peripheral in onset, usually affecting the lower limbs first, with loss of tendon reflexes and sometimes with fasciculation, glove and stocking sensory loss, paresthesias, spontaneous pain, and autonomic dysfunction.

Pregnancy may exacerbate some neuropathies, while pregnancy or parturition may be a direct or indirect cause of a variety of mononeuropathies and plexopathies, many of which may be incorrectly attributed to neuraxial anesthesia. Some peripheral neuropathies may alter drug sensitivity or impair respiration, and therefore present special challenges to the anesthesiologist. Pregnancy can also cause physical deterioration in restrictive respiratory disease, particularly if associated with scoliosis; it is important to remember that relief does not follow immediately after delivery, so the puerperium can be a dangerous time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Thomas P. K. Diseases of peripheral nerves. In Warrell, D. A., Cox, T. M. & Firth, J. D. (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Medicine, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, 2005; pp. 1180–93.
Lennox, G. G. Neurological disease in pregnancy. In Warrell, D. A., Cox, T. M. & Firth, J. D. (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Medicine, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, 2005; pp. 436–9.
Turbridy, N. & Redmond, J. M. T.Neurological symptoms attributed to epidural analgesia in labour: an observational study of seven cases. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996; 103: 832–3.Google Scholar
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Why Mothers Die 1979–81. London: RCOG Press, 1986.
Reynolds, F.Scoliosis and motherhood. SOAP Newsletter 1990; 22: 4–8.Google Scholar
Rudnik-Schoneborn, S., Rohrig, D., Nicholson, G. & Zerres, K.Pregnancy and delivery in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. Neurology 1993; 43: 2011–16.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. L., Chappatte, O. A., Spencer, G. T. & Raju, K. S.Pregnancy complicated by Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, requiring intermittent ventilation. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1992; 99: 79–80.Google Scholar
Brian, J. E. Jr., Boyles, G. D., Quirk, J. G. Jr.et al. Anaesthetic management for cesarean section of a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 410–12.Google Scholar
Sawicka, E. H., Spencer, G. T. & Branthwaite, M. A.Management of respiratory failure complicating pregnancy in severe kyphoscoliosis: a new use for an old technique?Br. J. Dis. Chest 1986; 80: 191–6.Google Scholar
Antognini, J. F.Anaesthesia for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a review of 86 cases. Can. J. Anaesth. 1992; 39: 398–400.Google Scholar
Reah, G., Lyons, G. R. & Wilson, R. C.Anaesthesia for caesarean section in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 586–8.Google Scholar
Patrick, J. A., Meyer-Whiting, M., Reynolds, F. & Spencer, G. T.Perioperative care in restrictive respiratory disease. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 390–5.Google Scholar
Scull, T.Epidural analgesia for labour in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Can. J. Anaesth. 1996; 43: 1150–2.Google Scholar
Hahn, A. F., Brown, W. F., Koopman, W. J. & Feasby, T. E.X-linked dominant motor and sensory neuropathy. Brain 1990; 113: 1511–25.Google Scholar
Viet, H. R.Refsum disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1947; 236: 996.Google Scholar
Lepski, G. R. & Alderson, J. D.Epidural analgesia in labour for a patient with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2001; 10: 198–201.Google Scholar
Peters, G. & Hinds, N. P.Inherited neuropathy can cause postpartum foot drop. Anesth. Analg. 2005; 100: 547–8.Google Scholar
Sweeney, B. P., Jones, S. & Langford, R. M.Anaesthesia in dysautonomia: further complications. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 783–6.Google Scholar
Porges, R. F., Axelrod, F. B. & Richards, M.Pregnancy in familial dysautonomia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1978; 132: 485–8.Google Scholar
Robertson, D., Haile, V., Perry, S. E.et al. Dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency. A genetic disorder of cardiovascular regulation. Hypertension 1991; 18: 1–8.Google Scholar
Scurrah, N. J., Ross, A. W. & Solly, M.Peripartum management of a patient with dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency, a rare congenital cause of dysautonomia. Anaesth. Intens. Care 2002; 30: 484–6.Google Scholar
Dell'oste, C., Vincenti, E. & Torre, G.Multiple and various anaesthetics, ketamine included, in a young patient with familial dysautonomia: case report. Minerva Pediatrica 1996; 48: 113–16.Google Scholar
Challands, J. F. & Facer, E. K.Epidural anaesthesia and familial dysautonomia (the Riley Day syndrome). Three case reports. Paed. Anaesth. 1998; 8: 83–8.Google Scholar
Lieberman, J. R., Cohen, A., Wiznitzer, A., Maayan, C. & Greemberg, L.Cesarean section by local anesthesia in patients with familial dysautonomia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 165: 110–11.Google Scholar
Hirsch, N. P., Murphy, A. & Radcliffe, J. J.Neurofibromatosis: clinical presentation and anaesthetic implications. Br. J. Anaesth. 2001; 86: 555–64.Google Scholar
Huson, S. M.What level of care for the neurofibromatoses?Lancet 1999; 353: 1114–16.Google Scholar
Sakai, T., Vallejo, M. C. & Shannon, K. T.A parturient with neurofibromatosis type 2: anesthetic and obstetric considerations for delivery. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2005; 14: 332–5.Google Scholar
Dounas, M., Mercier, F. J., Lhuissier, C. & Benhamou, D.Epidural analgesia for labour in a parturient with neurofibromatosis. Can. J. Anaesth. 1995; 42: 420–2.Google Scholar
Spiegel, J. E., Hapgood, A. & Hess, P. E.Epidural anesthesia in a parturient with neurofibromatosis type 2 undergoing cesarean section. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2005; 14: 336–9.Google Scholar
www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic222.htm
Hughes, R. A., Hadden, R. D., Gregson, N. A. & Smith, K. J.Pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome. J. Neuroimmunol. 1999; 100: 74–97.Google Scholar
Hadden, R. D., Karch, H., Hartung, H. P.et al. Plasma Exchange/Sandoglobulin Guillain-Barré Syndrome Trial Group. Preceding infections, immune factors, and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurology 2001; 56: 758–65.Google Scholar
Hurley, T. J., Brunson, A. D., Archer, R. L.et al. Landry-Guillain-Barré-Strohl syndrome in pregnancy: report of three cases treated with plasmapheresis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 78: 482–5.Google Scholar
Zeeman, G. G.A case of acute inflammatory demyelating polyradiculoneuropathy in early pregnancy. Am. J. Perinatol. 2001; 18: 213–15.Google Scholar
Vassiliev, D. V., Nystrom, E. U. M. & Leicht, C. H.Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for labor and cesarean delivery in a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2001; 26: 174–6.Google Scholar
Brooks, H., Christian, A. S. & May, A. E.Pregnancy, anaesthesia and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 894–8.Google Scholar
Meche, F. G. & Schmitz, P. I.Dutch Guillain-Barré Study Group. A randomized trial comparing intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992; 326: 1123–9.Google Scholar
Guillain-Barré Syndrome Steroid Trial Group. Double-blind trial of intravenous methylprednisolone in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet 1993; 341: 586–90.
Yamada, H., Noro, N., Kato, E. H.et al. Massive intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in pregnancy complicated by Guillain-Barré syndrome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2001; 97: 101–4.Google Scholar
Wiertlewski, S., Magot, A., Drapier, S., Malinovsky, J-M. & Pereon, Y.Worsening of neurologic symptoms after epidural anesthesia for labor in a Guillain-Barré patient. Anesth. Analg. 2004; 98: 825–7.Google Scholar
McGrady, E. M.Management of labour and delivery in a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome. (letter) Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 899.Google Scholar
Alici, H. A., Cesur, M. & Erdem, A. F.Repeated use of epidural anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2005: 14: 269–70.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. & Straka, P. F.Successful epidural analgesia in a primigravida after recovery from Guillain-Barré syndrome. Reg. Anesth. 1988; 13: 129.Google Scholar
McCombe, P. A., McManis, P. G., Frith, J. A.et al. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy associated with pregnancy. Ann. Neurol. 1987; 21: 102.Google Scholar
Dorsey, D. L. & Camann, W. R.Obstetric anesthesia in patients with idiopathic facial paralysis (Bell's palsy): a 10-year survey. Anesth. Analg. 1993; 77: 81–3.Google Scholar
Donaldson, J. O.Neurology of Pregnancy, 2nd edn., Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1989.
Farrar, D. & Raoof, N.Bell's palsy, childbirth and epidural analgesia. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2001; 10: 68–70.Google Scholar
Collier, C. B.Bilateral trigeminal nerve palsy during extensive lumbar epidural block. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 1997; 6: 185–9.Google Scholar
Sprung, J., Haddox, D. & Maitra-D'Cruze, A. M.Horner's syndrome and trigeminal nerve palsy following epidural anaesthesia in obstetrics. Can. J. Anaesth. 1991; 38: 767–71.Google Scholar
Carrero, E. J., Agusti, M., Fabregas, N.et al. Unilateral trigeminal and facial nerve palsies associated with epidural analgesia in labour. Can. J. Anaesth. 1998; 45: 893–7.Google Scholar
Martin-Hirsch, D. P. & Martin-Hirsch, P. L.Vestibulocochlear dysfunction following epidural anaesthesia in labour. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1994; 48: 340–1.Google Scholar
Chohan, U., Khan, M. & Saeed-uz-zafar, . Abducent nerve palsy in a parturient with a 25-gauge Sprotte needle. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2003; 12: 235–6.Google Scholar
Heyman, H. J., Salem, M. R. & Klimov, I.Persistent sixth cranial nerve paresis following blood patch for postdural puncture headache. Anesth. Analg. 1982; 61: 948–9.Google Scholar
Dunbar, S. A. & Katz, N. P.Failure of delayed epidural blood patching to correct persistent cranial nerve palsies. Anesth. Analg. 1994; 79: 806–7.Google Scholar
Szokol, J. W. & Falleroni, M. J.Lack of efficacy of an epidural blood patch in treating abducent nerve palsy after an unintentional dura puncture. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 1999; 24: 470–2.Google Scholar
Brussé, C. A. & Burke, F. D.Recurrent anterior interosseous nerve palsies related to pregnancy. J. Hand Surg. (British and European volume) 1998; 23B: 102–3.Google Scholar
Klein, C. J., Dyck, P. J. B., Friedenberg, S. M.et al. Inflammation and neuropathic attacks in hereditary brachial plexus neuropathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 2002; 73: 45–50.Google Scholar
Roubal, P. J., Chavinson, A. H. & LaGrandeur, R. M.Bilateral radial nerve palsies from use of the standard birthing chair. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 87: 820–1.Google Scholar
Tillman, A. J. B.Traumatic neuritis in the puerperium. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1935; 29: 660–6.Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. A.Traumatic neuritis of the puerperium. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 1949; 56: 205–16.Google Scholar
Hill, E. C.Maternal obstetric paralysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1962; 83: 1452–60.Google Scholar
Murray, R. R.Maternal obstetric paralysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1964; 88: 399–403.Google Scholar
Feasby, T. E., Burton, S. R. & Hahn, A. F.Obstetrical lumbosacral plexus injury. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 937–40.Google Scholar
Reynolds, F. & Bromage, P. Neurologic sequelae of childbirth and regional anesthesia. In Chestnut, D. (ed.), Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn., St Louis: Mosby, 2004, pp. 579–601.
Holdcroft, A., Gibberd, F. B., Hargrove, R. L., Hawkins, D. F. & Dellaportas, C. I. Neurological problems associated with pregnancy. Br. J. Anaesth. 1995; 75: 522–6.Google Scholar
Ong, B. Y., Cohen, M. M., Esmail, A.et al. Paresthesias and motor dysfunction after labor and delivery. Anesth. Analg. 1987; 66: 18–22.Google Scholar
Dar, A. Q., Robinson, A. P. C. & Lyons, G.Postpartum neurological symptoms following regional blockade: a prospective study with case controls. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2002; 11: 85–90.Google Scholar
Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Dugan, S.et al. Incidence of postpartum lumbosacral spine and lower extremity nerve injuries. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 101: 279–88.Google Scholar
Holloway, J., Seed, P. T., O'Sullivan, G. & Reynolds, F.Paraesthesiae and nerve damage following combined spinal–epidural and spinal anaesthesia. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2000; 9: 151–5.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. E., Duker, B., Siegel, S. & Keon, T. P.Common peroneal nerve palsy associated with epidural analgesia. Anesth. Analg. 1993; 76: 429–31.Google Scholar
Silva, M., Mallinson, C. & Reynolds, F.Sciatic nerve palsy following childbirth. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1144–8.Google Scholar
Kahn, L.Neuropathies masquerading as an epidural complication. Can. J. Anaesth. 1997; 44: 313–16.Google Scholar
Bademosi, O., Osuntokun, B. O., Werd, J. H.et al. Obstetric neuropraxia in the Nigerian African. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1980; 17: 611–14.Google Scholar
Warner, M. A., Warner, D. O., Harper, M., Schroeder, D. R. & Maxson, P. M.Lower extremity neuropathies associated with lithotomy positions. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 938–42.Google Scholar
Gherman, R., Ouzounian, J. G., Incerpi, M. H. & Goodwin, T. M.Symphyseal separation and transient femoral neuropathy associated with the McRoberts maneuver. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998; 178: 609–10.Google Scholar
Diver, T. & Camann, W.Meralgia paresthetica in the parturient. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 1995; 4: 109–12.Google Scholar
Umo-Etuk, J. & Yentis, S. M.Sciatic nerve injury and caesarean section (letter). Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 605–6.Google Scholar
Roy, S., Levine, A. B., Herbison, G. J. & Jacobs, S. R.Intraoperative positioning during cesarean as a cause of sciatic neuropathy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 99: 652–3.Google Scholar
Babayev, M., Bodack, M. P. & Creatura, C.Common peroneal neuropathy secondary to squatting during childbirth. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998; 91: 830–2.Google Scholar
MacLeod, A. F., Smith, S. A., Sonksen, P. H. & Lowy, C.The problem of autonomic neuropathy in diabetic pregnancy. Diabetic Medicine 1990; 7: 80–2.Google Scholar
Hagay, Z. & Weissman, A.Management of diabetic pregnancy complicated by coronary artery disease and neuropathy. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. America 1996; 23: 205–20.Google Scholar
Page, M. M. & Watkins, P. J.Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Lancet 1987; i (8054): 14–16.Google Scholar
Lapolla, A., Cardone, C., Negrin, P.et al. Pregnancy does not induce or worsen retinal and peripheral nerve dysfunction in insulin-dependent diabetic women. J. Diabetes and its Complications 1998; 12: 74–80.Google Scholar
Brodie, M. J., Moore, M. R., Thompson, G. G.et al. Pregnancy and the acute porphyrias. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1977; 84: 726–31.Google Scholar
Bancroft, G. H. & Lauria, J. I.Ketamine induction for cesarean section in a patient with acute intermittent porphyria and achondroplastic dwarfism. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: 143–4.Google Scholar
Hempenstall, K. & Holland, R.Regional anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section in a patient with lepromatous leprosy. Anaesth. Intens. Care 1997; 25: 168–70.Google Scholar
Duncan, M. E.Pregnancy and leprosy neuropathy. Ind. J. Leprosy 1996; 68: 23–34.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. M. & Olney, R. K.Peripheral neuropathies associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Neurol. Clin. 1992; 10: 685–711.Google Scholar
Kissel, J. T. & Mendell, J. R. Vasculitic neuropathy. Neurol. Clin. 1992; 10: 761–81.Google Scholar
Ramsey-Goldman, R.The effect of pregnancy on the vasculitides. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 1998; 107: 116–17.Google Scholar
Regt, Haynes R.Sarcoidosis and pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 70: 369–72.Google Scholar
Cohen, R., Talwar, A. & Efferen, L. S.Exacerbation of underlying respiratory disease in pregnancy. Crit. Care Clin. 2004; 20: 713–30.Google Scholar
Klaassen, D. Heavy metals and heavy-metal antagonists. In Hardman, J. G. & Limbird, L. E. (eds.), Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 9th edn., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 1649.
Graef, J. W. Heavy metal poisoning. In Isselbacher, K. J., Braunwald, E., Wilson, J. D.et al. (eds.), Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 13th edn., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1994, p. 2461.
Sowers, M., Jannausch, M., Scholl, T.et al. Blood lead concentrations and pregnancy outcomes. Arch. Environ. Health 2002; 57: 489–95.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Blood mercury levels in young children and childbearing-aged women – United States, 1999–2002. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2004; 53: 1018–20.
Charness, M. E., Simon, R. P. & Greenberg, D. A.Ethanol and the nervous system. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989; 321: 442–54.Google Scholar
Reynolds, F.Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a constant cause of confusion. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2005; 30: 314–16.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×