Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:45:11.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Liver disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

By
Enrique J. Martinez
Edited by
Michael F. Lubin ,
Robert B. Smith ,
Thomas F. Dodson ,
Nathan O. Spell  and
H. Kenneth Walker
Enrique J. Martinez
Affiliation:
Division Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Robert B. Smith
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Nathan O. Spell
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
H. Kenneth Walker
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Discussion of the medical management of the surgical patient is not complete unless one considers the key role that the liver plays in the body metabolism. The liver is the site of synthesis of many endogenous proteins that are involved in both the healing process as well as in the breakdown of the multitude of medications that patients receive. Unsuspected liver disease is estimated to occur in 1 in 700 otherwise healthy surgical candidates. Some of these patients may be identified before surgery by abnormalities of blood work suggesting liver dysfunction. The degree of concern raised is dependent upon the degree and type of abnormality as well as the type of surgery. In the sections to follow we will examine these issues and attempt to provide a practical approach to the evaluation, risk assessment, and management of these patients.

Abnormal liver tests

The first order of evaluation of the abnormal liver tests is to determine their time of origin. Pre-existing abnormalities suggest non-operative factors and acute development of abnormalities later suggest operative or postoperative events. The role of a careful review of presurgical records and medical history taking cannot be overemphasized. Careful review of intraoperative and postoperative medical data complement the review process. Further diagnostic testing is dictated by review of this information.

Preoperative evaluation

While many blood tests may reflect liver diseases, we will focus on the enzymes aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin, and coagulation tests.

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
 , pp. 186 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schemel, W. H.Unexpected hepatic dysfunction found by multiple laboratory screening. Anesth. Analg. (Cleve.) 1976; 55: 810.Google ScholarPubMed
Wataneeyawech, M. & Kelly, K. A. Jr.Hepatic diseases unsuspected before surgery. NY State J. Med. 1975; 75: 1278.Google ScholarPubMed
Martinez, E. J. & Boyer, T. D. Preoperative and postoperative hepatic dysfunction. In Zakim, D., Boyer, T. D., eds. Hepatology: A Textbook of Liver Disease, Orlando: W. B. Saunders, 2002.Google Scholar
Ngai, S. H.Effects of anesthetics on various organs. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980; 302: 564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooperman, L. H.Effects of anesthesia on the splanchnic circulation. Br. J. Anaesth. 1972; 44: 967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, K. J. & Hughes, E. S. R.Laparotomy in viral hepatitis. Med. J. Aust. 1968; 1: 710.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. A., Strauss, S. F., Schwartz, A. H.et al. Decompression by drainage of the common bile duct in subacute and chronic jaundice: A report of 73 cases with hepatitis or concomitant biliary duct infection as cause. Am. J. Surg. 1959; 97: 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourke, J. B., Cannon, P., & Ritchie, H. D.Laparotomy for jaundice. Lancet 1967; ii: 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. D., O'Connor, M. L., & Kerr, R. M.Extreme serum elevations of aspartate aminotransferase. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1995; 90: 1244.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, L. S. & Maddrey, W. C.Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Med. Clin. North Am. 1987; 71: 453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargrove, M. D.Chronic active hepatitis possible adverse effect of exploratory laparotomy. Surgery 1970; 68: 771.Google ScholarPubMed
Garrison, R. N., Cryer, H. M., Howard, D. A.et al. Clarification of risk factors for abdominal operations in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Ann. Surg. 1984; 199: 648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M. W. & Burk, R. F.Development of intractable ascites following upper abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis. Am. J. Med. 1986; 80: 879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, C. B., Snell, A. M., & Rowntree, L. G.Decompensated portal cirrhosis. Report of 112 cases. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1931; 97: 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. B., Snell, A. M., & Rowntree, L. G.Decompensated portal cirrhosis. Report on one hundred and twelve cases. Clinical features of the ascitic stage of cirrhosis of the liver. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1981; 97: 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, J. P., Aranha, G. V., Wilkinson, W. A.et al. Umbilical herniorrhaphy in cirrhotic patients. Arch. Surg. 1984; 119: 442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonemoto, R. H. & Davidson, C. S.Herniorrhaphy in cirrhosis of the liver with ascites. N. Engl. J. Med. 1956; 255: 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maniatis, A. G. & Hunt, C. M.Therapy for spontaneous umbilical hernia rupture. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1995; 90: 310.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloch, R. S., Allaben, R. D., & Wait, A. J.Cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Arch. Surg. 1985; 120: 669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friel, C. M.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a five-year experience. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 1999; 3: 286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yerdel, M. A., Tsuge, H., Mimura, H.et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: expanding indications. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 1993; 3: 180.Google ScholarPubMed
Yerdel, M. A.Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Surg. Laprarosc. Endosc. 1997; 7: 483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sleeman, D.Laparascopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1998; 187: 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalswamy, N.Risks of intra-abdominal nonshunt surgery in cirrhotics. Dig. Dis. 1998; 16: 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Alburquerque, L. A.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 1995; 5: 272.Google Scholar
Hurst, R. D.Management of groin hernias in patients with ascites. Ann. Surg. 1992; 216: 696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, G. C. Postoperative hepatic dysfunction. In Zakim, D., Boyer, T. D., eds. Hepatology: A Textbook of Liver Disease, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1990: 869.Google Scholar
Farrell, G. C. Liver disease due to anaesthetic agents. In Farrell, G. C., ed. Drug-Induced Liver Disease. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994: 389.Google Scholar
Ziser, A., Plevak, D. J., Weisner, R. H.et al. Morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patient undergoing anesthesia and surgery, Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, G. C. Paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity. In Farrell, G. C., ed. Drug-Induced Liver Disease. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994: 205.Google Scholar
LaMont, J. T.Postoperative jaundice. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1974; 54: 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, J. E., Menashe, P. I., & Cruz, E.Gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients: the intensivists' overview. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1986; 81: 227.Google ScholarPubMed
LaMont, J. T. & Isselbacher, K. J.Postoperative jaundice. N. Engl. J. Med. 1974; 288: 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M., Hefti, M. L., Gattiker, R.et al. Benign postoperative intrahepatic cholestasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1965; 272: 545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kantrowitz, P. A., Jones, W. A., Greenberger, N. J., & Isselbacher, K. J.Severe postoperative hyperbilirubinemia simulating obstructive jaundice. N. Engl. J. Med. 1967; 276: 591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
te Boekhorst, T., Urlus, M., Doesburg, W.et al. Etiologic factors of jaundice in severely ill patients. A retrospective study in patients admitted to an intensive care unit with severe trauma or with septic intra-abdominal complications following surgery and without evidence of bile duct obstruction. J. Hepatol. 1988; 7: 111.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattau, E. L., Benjamin, S. B., Knuff, T. E., & Castell, D. O.The accuracy of the physical examination in the diagnosis of suspected ascites. JAMA 1982; 247: 1164–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runyon, B. Ascites. In Schiff, L. & Schiff, E., eds. Diseases of the Liver. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1993: 989.Google Scholar
Arroyo, V., Bernardi, M., Epstein, M., Henriksen, J. H., Schrier, R. W., & Rodes, J.Pathophysiology of ascites and functional renal failure in cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 1988; 6: 239–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoefs, J. L., Canawati, H. N., & Sapico, F. L.Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology 1982; 2: 399–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longmire-Cook, S. J.Pathophysiologic factors and management of ascites. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1993; 176: 191–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Powell, W. J. & Klatskin, G.Duration of survival in patients with Laennec's cirrhosis. Am. J. Med. 1968; 44: 406–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conn, H. O.Introduction to ASAIO workshop on peritoneovenous shunt in the management of ascites. ASAIO Trans. 1989; 35: 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longmire-Cook, S. J.Pathophysiologic factors and management of ascites. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1993; 176: 191–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Linas, S. L., Anderson, R. J., Miller, P. D., & Schrier, R. W. The rational use of diuretics in cirrhosis. In The Kidney in Liver Disease. 2nd edn., ed. Epstein, M.. New York: Elsevier Biomedical, 1983: 555–567.Google Scholar
Stassen, W. N. & McCullough, A. J.Management of ascites. Semin. Liver Dis. 1985; 5: 291–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shear, L., Ching, S., & Gabuzda, G. J.Compartmentalization of ascites and edema in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1970; 232: 1391–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pockros, P. J. & Reynolds, T. B.Rapid diuresis in patients with ascites from chronic liver disease: the importance of peripheral edema. Gastroenterology 1986; 90: 1827–1833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sansom, S. C. & O'Neill, R. G.Effects of mineralocorticoids on transport properties of cortical collecting duct basolateral membrane. Am. J. Physiol. 1986; 251: F743–F757.Google ScholarPubMed
Fogel, M. R., Sawhney, V. K., Neal, E. A., Miller, R. G., Knauer, C. M., & Gregory, P. B.Diuresis in the ascitic patient: a randomized controlled trial of three agents. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 1981; 3: 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Ayuso, R. M., Arroyo, V., Planas, R.et al. Randomized comparative trial of efficacy of furosemide vs. Spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Gastroenterology 1983; 84: 961–968.Google Scholar
Laffi, G., Marra, F., Buzelli, G.et al. Comparison of the effects of torasemide and furosemide in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites: a randomized, double-blind study. Hepatology 1991; 13: 1101–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broekhuysen, J., Deger, F., Douchamps, J., Ducarne, H., & Herchuelz, A.Torasemide, a new potent diuretic. Double-blind comparison with furosemide. Europ. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1986; 31: Suppl:29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, C. J., Fitton, A., & Brogden, R. N.Torasemide. An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1995; 49: 121–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, M., Lepp, B. A., & Hoffman, D. S.Potentiation of furosemide by metolazone in refractory edema. Curr. Ther. Res. 1977; 21: 656–660.Google Scholar
Gerbes, A. L.Medical treatment of ascites in cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 1993; 12: S4–S9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, A. K.Paracentesis for ascites in cirrhotic patients. Gastroenterol. Int. 1990; 2: 120–123.Google Scholar
Gines, P., Arroyo, V., Quintero, E.et al. Comparison of paracentesis and diuretics in the treatment of cirrhotics with tense ascites. Results of a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gines, P., Tito, L. I., Arroyo, V.et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1988; 94: 1493–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gines, P. & Arroyo, V.Paracentesis in the management of cirrhotic ascites. J. Hepatol. 1993; 12: S14–S18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, P. D., Langer, B., Blendis, L. M., Taylor, B. R., & Glynn, M. F.Complications after peritoneovenous shunting for ascites. Am. J. Surg. 1980; 139: 125–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starling, J. R.Peritoneovenous shunting in the management of malignant and cirrhotic ascites. Wis. Med. J. 1980; 79: 25–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Rubinstein, D., McInnes, I., & Dudley, F.Morbidity and mortality after peritoneovenous shunt for refractory ascites. Gut 1985; 26: 1070–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, T. D. & Goldman, I. S.Treatment of cirrhotic ascites. Adv. Intern. Med. 1986; 31: 3359–3377.Google ScholarPubMed
LeVeen, H. H., Vujic, I., d'Ovidio, N. G., & Hutto, R. B.Peritoneovenous shunt occlusion: etiology, diagnosis, therapy. Ann. Surg. 1984; 200: 212–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smadja, C. & Franco, D.The LeVeen shunt in the elective treatment of intractable ascites in cirrhosis. A prospective study on 140 patients. Ann. Surg. 1985; 201: 488–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenlee, H. B., Stanley, M. M., & Reinhardt, G. F.Intractable ascites treated with peritoneovenous shunt (LeVeen). Arch. Surg. 1981; 116: 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeen, E. G. & LeVeen, H. H.The place of the peritoneovenous shunt in the treatment of ascites. ASAIO Trans 1989; 35: 165–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foley, W. J., Elliott, J. P. Jr., Smith, R. F., Reddy, D. J., Lewis, J. R. Jr., & Hageman, J. H.Central venous thrombosis and embolism associated with peritoneovenous shunts. Arch. Surg. 1984; 119: 713–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebrec, D., Giuily, N., Hadengue, A.et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) vs paracentesis for refractory ascites: results of a randomized trial. J. Hepatol. 1996; 25: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, A., Rossle, M., Haag, K.et al. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt procedure for refractory ascites. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995; 332: 1192–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benner, K. G., Sahagun, G., & Saxon, R.Selection of patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for refractory ascites. [Abstract]. Hepatology 1994; 20: 114A.Google Scholar
Ferral, H., Bjarnason, H., & Wegrym, S. A.Refractory ascites: early experience in treatment with transjugular intrahepatics portosystemic shunt. Radiology 1993; 189: 795–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somberg, K., Lake, J. R., Tomlanovich, S. J., LaBerge, J. M., Feldstein, V., & Bass, N. M.Transjugular intrahepatic portal–systemic shunt in the treatment of refractory ascites: effect on clinical and hormonal response and renal function. Hepatology 1995; 1: 709–716.Google Scholar
Quiroga, J., Sangro, B., Nunez, M.et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portal–systemic shunt in the treatment of refractory ascites: effect on clinical, renal, humoral, and hemodynamic parameters. Hepatology 1995; 21: 986–994.Google ScholarPubMed
Enrique, J., Martinez, E. J., & Jeffers, L. Self-limited viral hepatitis: A, E, CMV. EBV. In Wu, G. & Israel, J., eds. Disease of the Liver and Bile Ducts: Diagnosis and Treatment. Humana Press; 1998: 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allard, J. P., Chau, J., Sandokji, K., Blendis, L. M., & Wong, F.Effects of ascites resolution after successful TIPS on nutrition in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(8): 2442–2447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×