Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T08:23:28.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The ecological context: a landscape perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2009

Richard J. Hobbs
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
Martin R. Perrow
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Anthony J. Davy
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Restoration ecology has developed from, and has been practised primarily on, a site-based approach. The restoration of a well-defined area such as a minesite, wetland or a degraded ecosystem of some description is generally attempted. However, it is clear that relatively large areas of the earth are in need of some form of restoration, following degradation through overuse or inappropriate management, which has impaired the functioning or altered the structure of the landscape as a whole (MacMahon, 1998). Thus, there is a need to expand the scope of restoration ecology to embrace broader scales and tackle landscape-scale problems. While this is increasingly recognised, the science of landscape-scale restoration is still in a formative phase (Bell et al., 1997). In this chapter I present a summary of landscape structure and function, discuss the impacts of human modification of landscapes, and present a series of options for developing guidelines for landscape restoration. Some of the material in this chapter is modified from work presented elsewhere (Hobbs, 1995, 1999; Hobbs & Harris, 2001; Hobbs & Lambeck, in press).

LANDSCAPES: STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

A landscape is defined as an area of land, at the scale of hectares to square kilometres, which consists of a collection of different, but interacting patches (also called landscape elements). Patchiness focuses on the spatial matrix of ecological processes, and emphasises the fluxes of materials and organisms within and between parts of the landscape.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleton, E. L. (1995). A cross-media approach to saving the Chesapeake Bay. Environmental Science and Technology, 29, 550A–555ACrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aronson, J. & Floc'h, E. (1996a). Hierarchies and landscape history: dialoging with Hobbs and Norton. Restoration Ecology, 4, 327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J. & Floc'h, E. (1996b). Vital landscape attributes: missing tools for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 4, 377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Floret, C., Floc'h, E., Ovalle, C. & Pontanier, R. (1993). Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semiarid regions. 1: A view from the South. Restoration Ecology, 1, 8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. L. (1992). The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecology, 7, 181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, J. P., Poschlod, P., Strykstra, R. J., Bekker, R. M. & Thompson, K. (1996). Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 45, 461–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendregt, A., Wassen, M. J. & Schot, P. P. (1995). Hydrological systems beyond a nature reserve, the major problem in wetland conservation of Naardermeer (The Netherlands). Biological Conservation, 72, 393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S. S., Fonseca, M. S. & Motten, L. B. (1997). Linking restoration and landscape ecology. Restoration Ecology, 5, 318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. F. (1999). Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN
Boecklen, W. J. (1997). Nestedness, biogeographic theory, and the design of nature reserves. Oecologia, 112, 123–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boggess, C. F., Flaig, E. G. & Fluck, R. C. (1995). Phosphorus budget–basin relationships for Lake Okeechobee tributary basins. Ecological Engineering, 5, 143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, J. J., McCormick, P. V. & Niederlehner, B. R. (1993). A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia, 263, 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cale, P. & Hobbs, R. J. (1994). Landscape heterogeneity indices: problems of scale and applicability, with particular reference to animal habitat description. Pacific Conservation Biology, 1, 183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., Norton, B. G. & Haskell, B. D. (eds.) (1992). Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington, DC: Island Press
Dawson, D. (1994). Are Habitat Corridors Conduits for Animals and Plants in a Fragmented Landscape? A Review of the Scientific Evidence. London: English Nature
Delcourt, H. R. & Delcourt, P. A. (1991). Quaternary Ecology: A Paleoecological Perspective. New York: Chapman & Hall
Fischer, S. F., Poschlod, P. & Beinlich, B. (1996). Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1206–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaig, E. G. & Reddy, K. R. (1995). Fate of phosphorus in the Lake Okeechobee watershed, Florida, USA: overview and recommendations. Ecological Engineering, 5, 127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, T. (1994). The Future Eaters: An Ecological History of the Australasian Lands and People. Port Melbourne, Vic: Reed Books
Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley
George, R. J., McFarlane, D. J. & Speed, R. J. (1995). The consequences of a changing hydrologic environment for native vegetation in south Western Australia. In Nature Conservation, vol. 4, The Role of Networks, eds. D. A. Saunders, J. L. Craig & E. M. Mattiske, pp. 9–22. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty
Gosz, J. R. (1993). Ecotone hierarchies. Ecological Applications, 3, 369–376CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines-Young, R., Green, D. R. & Cousins, S. (eds.) (1993). Landscape Ecology and GIS. London: Taylor & Francis
Hansen, A. J. & di Castri, F. D. (eds.) (1992). Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows. New York: Springer-Verlag
Hanski, I. A. & Gilpin, M. E. (eds.) (1997). Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. New York: Academic Press
Hanski, I. & Simberloff, D. (1997). The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, eds. I. A. Hanski & M. E. Gilpin, pp. 5–26. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Hanski, I., Pöyry, J.Pakkala, T. & Kuussaari, M. (1995). Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics. Nature, 377, 618–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargis, C. D., Bissonette, J. A. & David, J. L. (1998). The behaviour of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 13, 167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. D. (1984). The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeographic Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. Chicago, IL: University of Chigago Press
Hill, C. J. (1995). Linear strips of rain forest vegetation as potential dispersal corridors for rain forest insects. Conservation Biology, 9, 1559–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. (1987). Disturbance regimes in remnants of natural vegetation. In Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation, eds. D. A. Saunders, G. W. Arnold, A. A. Burbridge & A. J. M. Hopkin, pp. 233–240. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty
Hobbs, R. J. (1992). Corridors for conservation: solution or bandwagon? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 389–392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, R. J. (1993a). Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Biological Conservation, 64, 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. (1993b). Can revegetation assist in the conservation of biodiversity in agricultural areas? Pacific Conservation Biology, 1, 29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. (1994). Dynamics of vegetation mosaics: can we predict responses to global change? Ecoscience, 1, 346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. (1995). Landscape ecology. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, vol. 2, ed. W. A. Nierenberg, pp. 417–428. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Hobbs, R. J. (1999). Restoration ecology and landscape ecology. In Issues in Landscape Ecology, eds. J. A. Wiens & M. R. Moss, pp. 70–77. Guelph, Ontario: International Association of Landscape Ecology
Hobbs, R. J. & Harris, J. A. (2001). Restoration Ecology: repairing the Earth's ecosystems in the new millenium. Restoration Ecology, 9, 239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. & Lambeck, R. L. (in press). Landscape science and management in Western Australia. In Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management, eds. J. Liu & W. W. Taylor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hobbs, R. J. & Norton, D. A. (1996). Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 4, 93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. & Saunders, D. A. (eds.) (1993). Reintegrating Fragmented Landscapes: Towards Sustainable Production and Conservation. New York: Springer-Verlag
Hobbs, R. J. & Wilson, A.-M. (1998). Corridors: theory, practice and the achievement of conservation objectives. In Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology, eds. J. W. Dover & R. G. H. Bunce, pp. 265–279. Preston, UK: International Association for Landscape Ecology
Hobbs, R. J. & Yates, C. J. (1997). Moving from the general to the specific: remnant management in rural Australia. In Frontiers in Ecology: Building the Links, eds. N. Klomp & I. Lunt, pp. 131–142. London: Elsevier Science
Hobbs, R. J., Saunders, D. A. & Arnold, G. W. (1993). Integrated landscape ecology: a Western Australian perspective. Biological Conservation, 64, 231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, M. M., Risser, P. G. & Naiman, R. J. (eds.) (1991). Ecotones: The Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments. New York: Chapman & Hall
Hornung, M. & Reynolds, B. (1995). The effects of natural and anthropogenic environmental changes on ecosystem processes at the catchment scale. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 443–449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, W. E. (ed.) (1991). Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press
Kapos, V. (1989). Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 5, 173–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D. H. (1987). Parasites, lightning, and the vegetation mosaic in wilderness landscapes. In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, ed. M. G. Turner, pp. 59–83. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Kolasa, J. & Waltho, N. (1998). A hierarchical view of habitat and its relationship to species abundance. In Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications, eds. D. Peterson & V. T. Parker, pp. 55–76. New York: Columbia University Press
Lambeck, R. J. (1997). Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 11, 849–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambeck, R. J. (1999). Landscape Planning for Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Regions, Biodiversity Technical Paper no. 2. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage
Laurance, W. F. & Bierregaard, R. O. (eds.) (1997). Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Conservation and Management of Fragmented Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Laurance, W. F., Laurance, S. G., Ferreira, L. V., Rankin-de Merona, J. M., Gascon, C. & Lovejoy, T. E. (1997). Biomass collapse in Amazonian forest fragments. Science, 278, 1117–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
le Houérou, H. N. (1981). Impact of man and his animals on Mediterranean vegetation. In Mediterranean-Type Shrublands, eds. F. di Castri, D. W. Goodall & R. L. Specht, pp. 479–521. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Lomolino, M. V. (1994). An evaluation of alternative strategies for building networks of nature reserves. Biological Conservation, 69, 243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J., Tongway, D., Freudenberger, D., Noble, J. & Hodgkinson, K. (eds.) (1997). Landscape Ecology, Function and Management: Principles from Australia's Rangelands. Melbourne, Vic: CSIRO Publishing
MacMahon, J. A. (1998). Empirical and theoretical ecology as a basis for restoration: an ecological success story. In Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science, eds. M. L. Pace & P. M. Groffman. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Malle, K.-G. (1996). Cleaning up the River Rhine. Scientific American, 274, 70–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlack, G. R. (1993). Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biological Conservation, 66, 185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, D. R. (ed.) (1996). Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press
McIntyre, S. & Hobbs, R. J. (1999). A framework for conceptualizing human impacts on landscapes and its relevance to management and research. Conservation Biology, 13, 1282–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, S. & Hobbs, R. J. (in press). Human impacts on landscapes: matrix condition and management priorities. In Nature Conservation, vol. 5, Nature Conservation in Production Environments, eds. J. Craig, D. A. Saunders & N. Mitchell. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty
Middleton, B. (1999). Wetland Restoration: Flood Pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics. New York: John Wiley
Milton, S. J., Dean, W. R. J., du Plessis, M. A. & Siegfried, W. R. (1994). A conceptual model of arid rangeland degradation: the escalating cost of declining productivity. BioScience, 44, 70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murcia, C. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 58–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostfeld, R. S., Pickett, S. T. A., Shachak, M. & Likens, G. E. (1997). Defining the scientific issues. In The Ecological Basis of Conservation: Heterogeneity, Ecosystems and Biodiversity, eds. S. T. A. Pickett, R. S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak & G. E. Likens, pp. 3–10. New York: Chapman & HallCrossRef
Pearson, S. M., Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H. & O'Neill, R. V. (1996). An organism-based perspective of habitat fragmentation. In Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice, eds. R. C. Szaro & D. W. Johnston, pp. 77–95. New York: Oxford University Press
Pickett, S. T. A. & Cadenasso, M. L. (1995). Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science, 269, 331–334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, S. T. A. & Thompson, J. N. (1978). Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation, 13, 27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poschlod, P., Bakker, J., Bonn, S. & Fischer, S. (1996). Dispersal of plants in fragmented landscapes. In Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes, vol. 35, eds. J. Settele, C. Margules, P. Poschlod & K. Henle, pp. 123–127. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Rapport, D. J., Costanza, R. & McMichael, A. J. (1998). Assessing ecosystem health. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 397–402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowell, T. A. (1986). The history of drainage at Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire, England, and its relevance to conservation. Biological Conservation, 35, 111–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Margules, C. R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology, 5, 18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Arnold, G. W. (1993). The Kellerberrin project on fragmented landscapes: a review of current information. Biological Conservation, 64, 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, M., Hosper, S. H., Meijer, M.-L., Moss, B. & Jeppesen, E. (1993). Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 275–279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheiner, S. M. (1992). Measuring pattern diversity. Ecology, 73, 1860–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. W. (ed.) (1997). Conservation in Highly Fragmented Landscapes. New York: Chapman & Hall
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1994). Ecosystem health: a new paradigm for ecological assessment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 456–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. S. (1982). Island biogoegraphic theory and the design of wildlife refuges. Ékologiya, 4, 3–13Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. S. & Cox, J. (1987). Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conservation Biology, 1, 63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. S., Farr, J. A., Cox, J. & Mehlman, D. W. (1992). Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments. Conservation Biology, 6, 493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprugel, D. G. (1991). Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: what is ‘natural’ vegetation in a changing environment? Biological Conservation, 58, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suffling, R. (1993). Induction of vertical zones in subalpine valley forests by avalanche-formed fuel breaks. Landscape Ecology, 8, 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. & Merriam, G. (1993). Connectivity as a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68, 571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirgood, J. V. (1981). Man and the Mediterranean Forest: A History of Resource Depletion. London: Academic Press
Tongway, D. J. & Ludwig, J. A. (1996). Rehabilitation of semi-arid landscapes in Australia. 1: Restoring productive soil patches. Restoration Ecology, 4, 388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G. (1987). Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. New York: Springer-Verlag
Turner, M. G. (1989). Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G. & Gardner, R. H. (eds.) (1991). Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity, vol. 82. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V. & Kratz, T. K. (1993). A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 8, 213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H. & O'Neill, R. V. (1995). Ecological dynamics at broad scales. Ecosystems and landscapes. BioScience, Supplement 1995, S29–S35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S. J., O'Neill, R. V., Conley, W., Conley, M. R. & Humphries, H. C. (1991). Pattern and scale: statistics for landscape ecology. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity, vol. 82, eds. M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner, pp. 17–49. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Wallace, K. J. (ed.) (1998). Dongolocking Pilot Planning Project for Remnant Vegetation, Final Report (Phase 1). Perth, WA: Department of Conservation and Land Management
Whisenant, S. G. (1999). Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process-Orientated, Landscape-Scale Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wiens, J. A. (1997). Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, eds. I. A. Hanski & M. E. Gilpin, pp. 43–62. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Willis, E. O. (1984). Conservation, subdivision of reserves, and the anti-dismemberment hypothesis. Oikos, 42, 396–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.-M. & Lindenmayer, D. (1996). Wildlife Corridors and the Conservation of Biodiversity: A Review. Canberra: Greening Australia Ltd
With, K. A. (1997). The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 11, 1069–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
With, K. A. & Crist, T. O. (1995). Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure. Ecology, 76, 2446–2459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×