Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:31:56.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local and systemic signalling during a plant defence response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

J. A. Callow
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
J. R. Green
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

A principal feature of plant growth is the maximisation of surface area. This arises from the need of a sedentary organism to obtain the full spectrum of nutrients from the environment. One consequence of this survival strategy is increased vulnerability to pathogens and adverse conditions, since the subterranean and aerial boundaries of the organism with the external world will be immense.

Given this immensity and the lack of any specialised surveillance cells equivalent to the mammalian immune system, cells throughout the organism have evolved an ability to recognise foreign from self. The results of these molecular recognition events are reflected at the local site of stimulus perception but, importantly, are also transmitted to distant regions of the plant. There is now good evidence that defence gene expression and changes in the levels of defence-related products such as phytoalexins, callose and lignin are modulated by these local and systemic signalling events.

This chapter reviews research carried out on these topics at the University of Leeds, with particular reference to (1) plant defence responses to parasitic nematodes and (2) the molecular effectors of the wound-response. General literature to 1990, on defence-related proteins in higher plants has been reviewed by Bowles (1990a).

Plant–nematode interactions

One of the plant–nematode systems under study in my laboratory at Leeds University involves the response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants to potato cyst nematodes (Globodera spp.). The potato cultivar Maris Piper carries a single dominant gene for resistance (H1) that is effective against certain pathotypes of Globodera rostochiensis (for example, Ro1), but is ineffective against others (for example, Ro2) and against the closely related Globodera pallida (Sidhu & Webster, 1981).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×