Alexander, Loveday, “Formal Elements and Genre: Which Greco-Roman Prologues Most Closely Parallel the Lukan Prologues?” in Moessner, David P. (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's History (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999).Google Scholar

Alexander, LovedayThe Preface to Luke's Gospel: Literary Convention and Social Context in Luke 1.1–4 and Acts 1.1, Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 78 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manuel, Alexandre, Jr., Rhetorical Argumentation in Philo of Alexandria (Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Sidney, Allen, W., Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Sidney, Allen, W.Vox Graeca: A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Greek, 3rd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Alter, Robert, The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic Books, 1981).Google Scholar

Anderson, R. Dean, Jr., Glossary of Greek Rhetorical Terms Connected to Methods of Argumentation, Figures and Tropes from Anaximenes to Quintilian (Leuven: Peeters, 2000).Google Scholar

Argyle, A. W., “The Greek of Luke and Acts,” New Testament Studies 20 (1974), 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, , The “Art” of Rhetoric, trans. Aristotle, John Henry Freese, vol. XXII, Loeb Classical Library 193 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1926; reprint, 1939, 1947, 1959, 1967, 1975, 1982, 1991, 1994, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, Poetics, trans. Halliwell, Stephen (ed.), Aristotle, vol. XXIII, Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aune, David E., The New Testament in Its Literary Environment (Philadelphia, Pa.: Westminster Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Baur, Ferdinand Christian, , Paulus, der Apostel Jesu Christi, 1845; English translation: Paul, the Apostle of Jesus Christ: His Life and Work, His Epistles and His Doctrine, 2 vols., trans. Zeller, Eduard (London: Williams and Norgate, 1873–1876).Google Scholar

Beck, B. E., “The Common Authorship of Luke and Acts,” New Testament Studies 23 (1977), 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Pierre, “La deuxième visite de saint Paul à Jérusalem,” Biblica 40 (1959), 778–792.Google Scholar

Benoit, Pierre“Some Notes on the ‘Summaries’ in Acts 2, 4, and 5” in Jesus and the Gospel, vol. II, trans. Weatherhead, Benet (New York: Seabury Press, 1974); originally published as a paper contributed to the symposium Aux sources de la tradition chrétienne, mélanges offerts à M. Maurice Goguel (Neuchâtel-Paris, 1950).Google Scholar

Best, Ernest, The Temptation and the Passion: The Markan Soteriology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Bird, Michael F., “The Unity of Luke-Acts in Recent Discussion,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29 (2007), pp. 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Matthew, An Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts, 3rd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Blass, Friedrich, “On Attic Prose Rhythm” in Hermathena: A Series of Papers on Literature, Science, and Philosophy 32 (1906), 18–34.Google Scholar

Blenkinsopp, Joseph, The Pentateuch: An Introduction to the First Five Books of the Bible, Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1992).Google Scholar

Boismard, M.-É., and Lamouille, A., Texte occidental des Actes des Apôtres, 2 vols. (Paris: Éditions Recherche sur les Civilisations, 1984).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939).Google Scholar

Bovon, François, Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1–9:50, Koester, Helmut (ed.), trans. Thomas, Christine M., Hermeneia (Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press, 2002); originally published as L’évangile selon saint Luc 1, 1–9, 50 (Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1991).Google Scholar

Bovon, FrançoisL’évangile selon saint Luc 9, 51–14, 35 (Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1996).Google Scholar

Bovon, FrançoisL’évangile selon saint Luc 15,1–19, 27 (Geneva: Labor et Fides, 2001).Google Scholar

Breitenbach, H. P., “The De Compositione of Dionysius of Hall-Carnassus Considered with Reference to the Rhetoric of Aristotle,”Classical Philology 6 (1911), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louis, Brodie, Thomas, “Greco-Roman Imitation of Texts as a Partial Guide to Luke's Use of Sources” in Talbert, Charles H. (ed.), Luke-Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature (New York: Crossroad, 1984).Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E., Fitzmyer, Joseph A., and Murphy, Roland E. (eds.), The Jerome Biblical Commentary (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1968).Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The New Jerome Biblical Commentary (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1990).Google Scholar

Browning, R., and Giangrande, G. (eds.), Museum Philologum Londiniense, vol. I (Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1975).

Bruce, F. F., The Acts of the Apostles (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1990).Google Scholar

Bruder, Carl Hermann, Concordantiae omnium vocum Novi Testamenti graeci: primum ab Erasmo Schmidio editae, nunc secundum critices et hermeneutices nostrae aetatis rationes emendata auctae meliori ordine dispositae (Lipsiae: Sumptibus Ernesti Bredtii, 1867).Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf, The History of the Synoptic Tradition, trans. John Marsh from 3rd German edition (New York: Harper & Row, 1963); originally published as Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition, 3rd edition (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1957).Google Scholar

Buntinas, Martin, and Funk, Gerald M., Statistics for the Sciences (Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 2005).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J., The Book of Acts in History (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1955).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J.“Commentary on the Preface of Luke,” in Jackson, F. J. Foakes and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity, Part I: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. V: Additional Notes to the Commentary (London: Macmillan and Co., 1933).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J.The Making of Luke-Acts, 2nd edition (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1958; reprint, 1999).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J.The Style and Literary Method of Luke (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1920 reprint, Eugene, Ore.: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J.“The Summaries in Acts” in Jackson, F. J. Foakes and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity, Part I: The Acts of the Apostles vol. V: Additional Notes to the Commentary (London: Macmillan and Co., 1933).Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J.“The Tradition,” in Jackson, F. J. Foakes and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity, Part 1: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. II: Prolegomena II: Criticism (London: Macmillan and Co., 1922), pp. 210–211.

Cerfaux, Lucien, “The Acts of the Apostles” in Robert, A. and Feuillet, A. (eds.), Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Desclée, 1965).Google Scholar

Cerfaux, Lucien “La première communauté chrétienne à Jérusalem: Act. Ⅱ, 41–V, 42,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 16 (1939), 5–31.Google Scholar

Cerfaux, Lucien“La composition de la première partie du Livre des Actes” (first published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 13 (1936), pp. 667–691) in Recueil Lucien Cerfaux: Études d'Exégèse et d'Histoire Religieuse de Monseigneur Cerfaux, vol. Ⅱ (Leuven: 1954).Google Scholar

Cicero, , Orator, trans. Hubbell, H. M., Loeb Classical Library 342 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Clark, Albert C., The Acts of the Apostles: A Critical Edition with Introduction and Notes on Selected Passages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933; reprint 1970).Google Scholar

Co, Maria Anicia, “The Major Summaries in Acts: Acts 2,42–27; 4,32–35; 5:12–16: Linguistic and Literary Relationship,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 68 (1992), 49–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Shaye J. D., Josephus in Galilee and Rome: His Vita and Development as a Historian (Leiden: Brill, 1979).Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans, Acts of the Apostles, trans. Limburg, James, Kraabel, A. Thomas, and Juel, Donald H., Hermeneia (Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress Press, 1987); originally published as Die Apostelgeschichte (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1963, 1972).Google Scholar

Conzelmann, HansThe Theology of St. Luke, trans. Geoffrey Buswell (New York: Harper & Row, 1961); originally published as Die Mitte der Zeit (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1953).Google Scholar

Creed, John Martin, The Gospel According to St. Luke: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Indices (London: Macmillan & Co., 1950).Google Scholar

Crenshaw, James L., Education in Ancient Israel: Across the Deadening Silence, Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1998).Google Scholar

Cribiore, Raffaella, Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cribiore, RaffaellaWriting, Teachers, and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt (Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danker, Frederick W., A Century of Greco-Roman Philology (Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Danker, Frederick W.Luke, Proclamation Commentaries (Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Dawsey, J., “The Literary Unity of Luke-Acts: Questions of Style – A Task for Literary Critics,” New Testament Studies 35 (1989), 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deissmann, Adolf, New Light on the New Testament: From Records of the Græco-Roman Period, trans. Strachan, Lionel R. M. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1907).Google Scholar

Delobel, Joël, “La rédaction de Lc. Ⅳ,14–16a et le ‘Bericht vom Anfang’” in Neirynck, Frans (ed.), L’Évangile de Luc: problèmes littéraires et théologiques: mémorial Lucien Cerfaux, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 32 (Gembloux: Duculot, 1978).Google Scholar

Delobel, Joël, “The Text of Luke-Acts: A Confrontation of Recent Theories” in Verheyden, J. (ed.), The Unity of Luke-Acts, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 142 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Demetrius, On Style, trans. Innes, Doreen C. (ed.), Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint 1999).

Denniston, J. D., The Greek Particles, 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959).Google Scholar

Denniston, J. D.Greek Prose Style (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952; reprint 1960, 1965).Google Scholar

Martin, Dibelius, “The First Christian Historian” in Greevan, Heinrich (ed.), Studies in the Acts of the Apostles, trans. Ling, Mary (London: SCM Press, 1956; reprint, Mifflintown, Pa.: Sigler Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Martin, Dibelius, From Tradition to Gospel, trans. Woolf, Bertram Lee from the 2nd edition (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1935); originally published as Die Formgeschichte des Evangeliums (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1919).Google Scholar

Martin, Dibelius, “Style Criticism in the Book of Acts” in Greevan, Heinrich (ed.), Studies in the Acts of the Apostles, trans. Ling, Mary (London: SCM Press, 1956; reprint, Mifflintown, Pa.: Sigler Press, 1999); originally published as “Stilkritisches zur Apostelgeschichte” in H. Schmidt (ed.), Eucharisterion: Studien zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, Festschrift Hermann Gunkel, vol. Ⅱ (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1923).Google Scholar

Dionysius of Halicarnassas: Critical Essays, vol. I, trans. Usher, Stephen, Loeb Classical Library 465 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974; reprint, 2000).

,Dionysius of Halicarnassus, “On Literary Composition” in Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Critical Essays, vol. II, trans. Usher, Stephen, Loeb Classical Library 466 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Detlev, Dormeyer, The New Testament Among the Writings of Antiquity, Porter, Stanley E. (ed.), trans. Kossov, Rosemarie (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Dover, Kenneth, The Evolution of Greek Prose Style (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Dupont, Jacques, The Sources of Acts, trans. Pond, Kathleen (New York: Herder and Herder, 1964).Google Scholar

Eberling, Herman Louis, “Some Statistics on the Order of Words in Greek” in Studies in Honor of Basil L. Gildersleeve (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1902).Google Scholar

Egger, Wilhelm, Frohbotschaft und Lehre: Die Sammelberichte des Wirkens Jesu im Markusevangelium (Frankfurt am Main: Josef Knecht, 1976).Google Scholar

Elliott, J. K. (ed.), Studies in New Testament Language and Text: Essays in Honour of George D. Kilpatrick on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (Leiden: Brill, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eusebius, , The Ecclesiastical History, vol. Ⅰ, trans. Lake, Kirsopp, Loeb Classical Library 153 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1926; reprint 1949, 1953, 1959, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius (Baltimore, Md. and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D., “Rigorous or Reasoned Eclecticism – Which?” in Elliot, J. K. (ed.), Studies in New Testament Language and Text: Essays in Honour of George D. Kilpatrick on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (Leiden: Brill, 1976), pp. 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., The Acts of the Apostles: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, Anchor Bible 31 (New York: Doubleday, 1998).Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., “The Authorship of Luke-Acts Reconsidered” in Luke the Theologian: Aspects of His Teaching (New York: Paulist Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., The Gospel According to Luke: Ⅰ–Ⅸ, Anchor Bible 28 (New York: Doubleday, 1970).Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., The Gospel According to Luke: Ⅹ–ⅩⅩⅣ, Anchor Bible 28A (New York: Doubleday, 1985).Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., Luke the Theologian (New York: Paulist Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Foakes Jackson, F. J., and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity, Part 1: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. I: Prolegomena Ⅰ: The Jewish, Gentile, and Christian Backgrounds (London: Macmillan and Co., 1920).

Foakes Jackson, F. J., and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity, Part 1: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. II: Prolegomena Ⅱ: Criticism (London: Macmillan and Co., 1922).

Foakes Jackson, F. J., and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity, Part 1: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. Ⅴ: Additional Notes to the Commentary (London: Macmillan and Co., 1933).

Foakes Jackson, F. J., and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), “The Internal Evidence of Acts,” The Beginnings of Christianity: Part I: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. II (London: Macmillan and Co., 1933), pp. 121–204.

Foster, Donald W., Author Unknown: On the Trail of Anonymous (New York: Henry Holt, 2000).Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., Elegy by W. S.: A Study in Attribution (Newark, Del.: University of Delaware Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Frisk, Hjalmar, Studien zur griechischen Wortstellung, Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 39 (Gothenburg: Wettergren & Kerbers Förlag, 1933).Google Scholar

Fung, Glenn, The Disputed Federalist Papers: SVM Feature Selection via Concave Minimization (New York: ACM Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasque, W. Ward, A History of the Criticism of the Acts of the Apostles (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans, 1975).Google Scholar

Gibson, Craig A., “Learning Greek History in the Ancient Classroom: The Evidence of the Treatises on Progymnasmata,” Classical Philology 99 (2004), 103–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodell, Thomas Dwight, “The Order of Words in Greek” in Transactions of the American Philological Association 1890, vol. ⅩⅩI (New York: reprint, Johnson Reprint Corporation; Kraus Reprint Corporation, 1964).Google Scholar

Goodenough, Erwin R., “The Perspective of Acts,” in Keck, Leander E. and Martyn, J. Louis (eds.), Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert, Buckingham Professor of New Testament Criticism and Interpretation at Yale University (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 1966; London: SPCK, 1968, 1976, 1978; Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress Press, 1980; reprint, Mifflintown, Pa.: Sigler Press, 1999), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew, “The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke-Acts”Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29 (2007), pp. 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groot, A. W., A Handbook of Antique Prose-Rhythm (The Hague: J. B. Wolters – Groningen, 1919).Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A., The Greek and Roman Critics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965, 1968).Google Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst, The Acts of the Apostles: A Commentary, trans. Basil Blackwell (Philadelphia, Pa.: Westminster Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst, “Das ‘Wir’ in der Apostelgeschichte und das Itinerar,” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 58 (1961), 329–366.Google Scholar

Hahneman, Geoffrey Mark, The Muratorian Fragment and the Development of the Canon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnack, Adolf, The Acts of the Apostles, 2nd edition, trans. J. R. Wilkinson (London: Williams & Norgate; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1909); originally published as Die Apostelgeschichte, Beiträge zur Einleitung in das Neue Testament 3 (Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1908).Google Scholar

Harnack, Adolf, Luke the Physician: The Author of the Third Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles, trans. Wilkinson, J. R., 2nd edition (London: Williams & Norgate; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1909); originally published as Lukas der Arzt, der Verfasser des dritten Evangeliums und der Apostelgeschichte (Leipzig: 1906).Google Scholar

Harnack, Adolf, Sprüche und Reden Jesu: Die zweite Quelle des Matthäus und Lukas (Leipzig: 1907).Google Scholar

Hawkins, John C., Horae Synopticae: Contributions to the Study of the Synoptic Problem, 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909; reprint, 1968).Google Scholar

Hedrick, Charles W., “The Role of ‘Summary Statements’ in the Composition of the Gospel of Mark: A Dialog with Karl Schmidt and Norman Perrin,” Novum Testamentum 4 (1984), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemer, Colin J., The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History (Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1990; reprint, 2001).Google Scholar

Hendrickson, G. L., “Accentual Clausulae in Greek Prose of the First and Second Centuries of our Era,” The American Journal of Philology 29 (1908), 280–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hills, Julian V., et al. (eds.), Common Life in the Early Church: Essays Honoring Graydon F. Snyder (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1998).

Hock, Ronald F., and O'Neil, Edward N. (eds.), The Chreia and Ancient Rhetoric: Classroom Exercises (Atlanta, Ga.: Society of Biblical Literature, 2002).Google Scholar

André, Hurst, “Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste” in Haase, Wolfgang (ed.), Principat, vol. Ⅱ, Part 1, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1982).Google Scholar

Jeremias, J., Die Sprache des Lukasevangeliums: Redaktion und Tradition im Nicht-Markus-Stoff des dritten Evangeliums (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy, “Literary Criticism of Luke-Acts: Is Reception-History Pertinent?”Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29 (2007), pp. 159–162.Google Scholar

Jean-Daniel, Kaestli, “Luke-Acts and the Pastoral Epistles: The Thesis of a Common Authorship” in Tuckett, C. M. (ed.), Luke's Literary Achievement: Collected Essays, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 116 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Keck, Leander E., and Martyn, J. Louis (eds.), Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert, Buckingham Professor of New Testament Criticism and Interpretation at Yale University (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 1966; London: SPCK, 1968, 1976, 1978; Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress Press, 1980; reprint, Mifflintown, Penn.: Sigler Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A., “Aristotle on the Period,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63 (1958), 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, George A., The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World: 300 B. C.–A. D. 300 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A., Classical Rhetoric & Its Christian & Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A., A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony, A Stylometric Study of the New Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Kisirinya, S. K., “Re-Interpreting the Major Summaries (Acts 2:42–46; 4:32–35; 5:12–16),” African Christian Studies: The Journal of the Faculty of Theology of the Catholic Higher Institute of Eastern Africa, Nairobi 18 (2002), 67–74.Google Scholar

Klarreich, Erica, “Bookish Math: Statistical Tests are Unraveling Knotty Literary Mysteries,”Science News 164 (2003), 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klijn, A. F. J., A Survey of the Researches into the Western Text of the Gospels and Acts: Part 2 1949–1969 (Leiden: Brill, 1969).Google Scholar

Knox, Wilfred L., The Acts of the Apostles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948).Google Scholar

Knox, Wilfred L., Some Hellenistic Elements in Primitive Christianity, The Schweich Lectures on Biblical Archaeology, 1942 (London: Oxford University Press, 1944; Munich: Kraus Reprint, 1980).Google Scholar

Kremer, J., Les Actes des Apôtres: traditions, rédaction, théologie, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 48 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner Georg, The New Testament: The History of the Investigation of Its Problems, trans. Gilmour, S. McLean and Kee, Howard C. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Lake, Kirsopp and Lake, Silva, “The Acts of the Apostles,” Journal of Biblical Literature 53 (1934), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Kevin W., “The Structure of Mark's Gospel: Current Proposals,” Currents in Biblical Research 3 (2004), 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich, Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. Bliss, Matthew T., Jansen, Annemiek, and Orton, David E. (Leiden: Brill, 1998).Google Scholar

Leopold, J., and Conley, T., “Philo's Style and Diction” in David Winston and J. Dillon (eds.), Two Treatises of Philo of Alexandria (1983).

Liddell, H. G. and Jones, H. S. and McKenzie, R. and Scott, R., A Greek–English Lexicon, 9th edition, new supplement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Lightfoot, Robert Henry, Locality and Doctrine in the Gospels (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1938).Google Scholar

Andreas, Lindemann, “The Beginnings of Christian Life in Jerusalem According to the Summaries in the Acts of the Apostles (Acts 2:42–47; 4:32–37; 5:12–16)” in Hills, Julian V.et al. (eds.), Common Life in the Early Church: Essays Honoring Graydon F. Snyder (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1998).Google Scholar

Lohmeyer, Ernst, Galiläa und Jerusalem (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1936).Google Scholar

Longinus, On the Sublime, trans. Fyfe, W. Hamilton (ed.), rev. Donald Russell, Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint, 1999).

Lüdemann, Gerd, Early Christianity According to the Traditions in Acts: A Commentary (Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press, 1987).Google Scholar

MacRory, J., “The Authorship of the Third Gospel and the Acts,” Irish Theological Quarterly 2 (1907), 190–202.Google Scholar

Marguerat, Daniel, “The End of Acts (28:16–31) and the Rhetoric of Silence” in Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 90 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Marxen, Willi, Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel, trans. Boyce, James, Juel, Donald, Poehlmann, William with Harrisville, Roy A. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 1969); originally published as Der Evangelist Markus – Studien zur Redaktionsgeschichte des Evangeliums (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1956, 1959).Google Scholar

McCabe, Donald F., The Prose-Rhythm of Demosthenes (New York: Arno Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Mealand, David L., “Luke-Acts and the Verbs of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 63 (1996), 63–86.Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M., The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M., A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd edition (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994).Google Scholar

Moessner, David P., “The Appeal and Power of Poetics (Luke 1:1–4)” in Moessner, David P. (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's History (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999).Google Scholar

Moessner, David P. (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's History (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999).

Moessner, David P. (ed.), “The Lukan Prologues in the Light of Ancient Narrative Hermeneutics: Παρηκολουθηκότι and the Credentialed Author” in Verheyden, J. (ed.), The Unity of Luke-Acts, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 142 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).

Morgenthaler, R., Statistik des neutestamentlichen Wortschatzes (Zurich: Gotthelf-Verlag, 1958).Google Scholar

Mosteller, Frederick and Wallace, David L., “Deciding Authorship,” in Tanur, J. M.et al. (eds.), Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown (San Francisco, Calif.: Holden-Day, 1972), pp. 207–219.Google Scholar

Moulton, James Hope (ed.), A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. IV (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1976).Google Scholar

Moulton, James Hope and Howard, Wilbert Francis (eds.), A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. Ⅱ (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1920; reprint 1968).

Moulton, W. F., and Geden, A. S., A Concordance to the Greek Testament, 3rd edition (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1926).Google Scholar

Müller, K. (ed.), The Fragments of the Lost Historians of Alexander the Great: Fragmenta Scriptorum de Rebus Alexandri Magni, Pseudo-Callisthenes, Itinerarium Alexandri (Chicago, Ill.: Ares Publishers, 1979).

Neirynck, Frans (ed.), L’Évangile de Luc: problèmes littéraires et théologiques: mémorial Lucien Cerfaux, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 32 (Gembloux: Duculot, 1978).Google Scholar

Neirynck, Frans, “La matière Marcienne dans l’évangile de Luc,” in Neirynck, Frans (ed.), L’Évangile de Luc: The Gospel of Luke, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 32 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Neirynck, Frans and Segbroeck, F., “Caractéristiques stylistiques,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 61 (1984), 304–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nestle, Eberhard and Nestle, Erwin and Aland, Barbara and Aland, Kurt, et al. (eds.), Novum Testamentum Graece, 27th edition (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1993, 1994).

Neumaier, Wilfried, Antike Rhythmustheorien: Historische Form und Aktuelle Substanz (Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner, 1989).Google Scholar

Nikiprowetzky, V., “Caractère et structure du Commentaire Philonien” in Le Commentaire de l’Écriture chez Philon d'Alexandrie: son caractère et sa portée: observations philologiques (Leiden: Brill, 1977).Google Scholar

Noorda, S. J., “Scene and Summary: A Proposal for Reading Acts 4,32–5,16” in Kremer, J. (ed.), Les Actes des Apôtres: traditions, rédaction, théologie, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 48 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Norden, Eduard, Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede (Leipzig: Teubner, 1913; reprint, Stuttgart: Teubner, 1923; reprint, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956).Google Scholar

Norden, Eduard, Die antike Kunstprosa von vi. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 2 vols. (Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, 1958).Google Scholar

Norušis, Marija J., SPSS 11.0: Guide to Data Analysis (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2002).Google Scholar

Ó Fearghail, Fearghus, The Introduction to Luke-Acts: A Study of the Role of Lk 1,1–4,44 in the Composition of Luke's Two-Volume Work, Analecta Biblica: Investigationes Scientificae in Res Biblicas 126 (Rome: Editrice Pontificio Institutio Biblico, 1991).Google Scholar

O'Neill, Jr., Eugene, G., “The Importance of Final Syllables in Greek Verse,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 70 (1939), 256–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orton, David E. (ed.), The Composition of Luke's Gospel: Selected Studies from “Novum Testamentum” (Leiden: Brill, 1999).

Orton, David E., The Oxford Classical Dictionary, Hornblower, Simon and Spawforth, Antony (eds.), 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).

Oyen, Geert, De summaria in Marcus en de compositie van Mc 1,14–8,26, Studiorum Novi Testamenti Auxilia 12 (Leuven: Leuven University Press/Peeters, 1987).Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C., Luke: Storyteller, Interpreter, Evangelist (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007).Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C., “The Unity of the Lukan Writings: Rethinking the Opinio Communis” in Keathley, N. H. (ed.), With Steadfast Purpose: Essays on Acts in Honor of Henry Jackson Flanders, Jr. (Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C., “Who Wrote the Gospel of Luke?” Bible Review 17 (2001), 12–21, 54–55.Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C. and Pervo, Richard I., Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts (Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard, Dating Acts: Between the Evangelists and the Apologists (Santa Rosa, Calif.: Polebridge Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard, “Dating Acts,”Forum 5 (2002).Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard, “Israel's Heritage and Claims upon the Genre(s) of Luke and Acts: The Problems of a History” in Moessner, David P. (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's Legacy (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999).Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard, Profit with Delight: The Literary Genre of the Acts of the Apostles (Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Eckhard, Plümacher, “Cicero und Lukas: Bemerkungen zu Stil und Zweck der historischen Monographie” in Verheyden, J. (ed.), The Unity of Luke-Acts, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 142 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Eckhard, Plümacher, Lukas als hellenistischer Schriftsteller: Studien zur Apostelgeschichte (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1972).Google Scholar

Plummer, Alfred, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Luke, 5th edition (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1922; reprint, 1969).Google Scholar

Pohl, Karin “Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysios von Halikarnaβ, De compositione verborum,” unpublished PhD thesis, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen (1968).

Porter, Stanley E., Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B. C.–A. D. 400 (Boston, Mass.: Brill Academic Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. and Reed, Jeffrey T., “Greek Grammar since BDF: A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis,” Filologia Neotestamentaria 4 (1991), 143–164.Google Scholar

Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, trans. Butler, H. E., 4 vols., Loeb Classical Library 124–127 (London: William Heinemann, 1920–1922).

Richard, Earl, Acts 6:1–8:4: The Author's Method of Composition, Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 41 (Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Robbins, Vernon K., “The Claims of the Prologues and Greco-Roman Rhetoric: The Prefaces to Luke and Acts in Light of Greco-Roman Rhetorical Strategies” in Moessner, David P. (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's History (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999).Google Scholar

Robert, A., and Feuillet, A. (eds.), Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Desclée, 1965).

Roberts, W. Rhys, Demetrius: On Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De elocutione Edited after the Paris Manuscript (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902).Google Scholar

Roberts, W. Rhys, Dionysius of Halicarnassas: On Literary Composition: Being the Greek Text of the De compositione verborum (London: Macmillan and Co., 1910).Google Scholar

Roberts, W. Rhys, “The Greek Words for ‘Style’ (with Special Reference to Demetrius περὶ Ἑρμηνείας),” The Classical Review 15 (1901), 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rollins, Wayne G., The Gospels: Portraits of Christ (Philadelphia, Pa.: Westminster, 1963).Google Scholar

Russell, D. A., Criticism in Antiquity (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, Michael (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).

Russell, D. A., Classical Literary Criticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Russell, D. A., Plutarch (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1973).Google Scholar

Russell, Henry G., “Which Was Written First, Luke or Acts?” Harvard Theological Review 48 (1955), 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Satterthwaite, Philip E., “Acts against the Background of Classical Rhetoric” in Winter, Bruce W. and Clarke, Andrew D. (eds.), The Book of Acts in Its Ancient Literary Setting (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1993).Google Scholar

Schade, J., “De correptione Attica,” unpublished PhD thesis, Greifswald (1908).

Schenkeveld, Dirk M., “Linguistic Theories in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Glotta 61 (1983), 67–94.Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, Dirk M., “Theories of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus” in Browning, R. and Giangrande, G. (eds.), Museum Philologum Londiniense, vol. Ⅰ (Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1975).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Daryl D., “Rhetorical Influences and Genre: Luke's Preface and the Rhetoric of Hellenistic Historiography” in Moessner, David P. (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's History (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Karl Ludwig, Der Rahmen der Geschichte Jesu: Literarkritische Untersuchungen zur ältesten Jesusüberlieferung (Berlin: Nachdruck aus Ausgabe, 1919; reprint, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1965).Google Scholar

Schneckenburger, Matthias, Über den Zweck der Apostelgeschichte (Berne: Chr., Fischer, 1841).Google Scholar

Schneider, Gerhard, Das Evangelium nach Lukas, 2 vols. (Würzburg: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, Gütersloh und Echter Verlag, 1977).Google Scholar

Scholten, J. H., Is de derde evangelist de schrijiver van het boek der Handelingen? Critisch onderzoek (Leiden: Academische Boekhandel van P. Engels, 1873).Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard, “Eine hebraisierende Sonderquelle des Lukas?” Theologische Zeitschrift 6 (1950), 161–185.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Eduard, Griechische Grammatik: auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik, 3 vols. (Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1934 and 1939, 1950, 1953).Google Scholar

Skimina, Stanislas, État actuel des études sur le rythme de la prose grecque Ⅱ, EUSSup 11 (Lwów: Subventionnée par le Ministère de l'Instruction Publique Société Polon Paris, 1930).Google Scholar

Smyth, Herbert Weir, Greek Grammar, rev. Messing, Gordon M. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1920, 1956; renewed, 1984).Google Scholar

Snyder, H. Gregory, Teachers and Texts in the Ancient World: Philosophers, Jews and Christians (London: Routledge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sparks, H. F. D., “The Semitisms of Acts,” Journal of Theological Studies n. s., 1 (1950), 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanford, W. B., The Sound of Greek: Studies in the Greek Theory and Practice of Euphony (Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Stein, Robert, Gospels and Tradition: Studies on Redaction Criticism of the Synoptic Gospels (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1991).Google Scholar

Sterling, Gregory E., “‘Athletes of Virtue’: An Analysis of the Summaries in Acts (2:41–47; 4:32–35; 5:12–16),” Journal of Biblical Literature 113 (1994), 679–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeter, B. H., The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins, Treating of the Manuscript Tradition, Sources, Authorship, & Dates (London: Macmillan, 1924).Google Scholar

Sundberg, A. C., Jr., “Canon Muratori: A Fourth-Century List,” Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973), 1–41.Google Scholar

Swiggers, Pierre, and Wouters, Alfons, “Poetics and Grammar: From Technique to Τέκνη” in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honor of D. M. Schenkeveld (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H., Literary Patterns, Theological Themes, and the Genre of Luke-Acts (Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. (ed.), Luke-Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature Seminar (New York: Crossroad, 1984).

Tannehill, Robert C., Luke, Abingdon New Testament Commentaries (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Tannehill, Robert C., The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts: A Literary Interpretation, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Tannehill, Robert C., “Response to Patricia Walters, ‘The Gilded Hypothesis Revisited: Authorial Unity of Luke and Acts,’” unpublished paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, Washington, D. C., November, 2006.

Tanur, J. M.et al. (eds.), Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown (San Francisco, Calif.: Holden-Day, 1972).

Thesaurus Linguae Graecae, CD ROM vol. E (University of California Irvine: 1990).

Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War, trans. Lattimore, Steven (Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Co., 1998).

Tomkins, Daniel P., “Stylistic Characterization in Thucydides” unpublished PhD thesis, Yale University (1968).

Too, Yun Lee (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Leiden: Brill, 2001).Google Scholar

Torrey, Charles Cutler, The Composition and Date of Acts, Harvard Theological Studies 1 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1919; reprint, New York: Kraus reprint, 1969).Google Scholar

Tuckett, C. M., Luke's Literary Achievement: Collected Essays, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 116 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Turner, Nigel, Style, vol. IV of Moulton, James Hope (ed.), A Grammar of New Testament Greek (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1976).Google Scholar

Nigel, Turner, “The Quality of the Greek of Luke-Acts” in Elliot, J. K. (ed.), Studies in New Testament Language and Text: Essays in Honour of George D. Kilpatrick on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday, Supplements to Novum Testamentum 44 (Leiden: Brill, 1976).Google Scholar

Turner, Nigel, “The Style of Luke-Acts” in Moulton, James Hope (ed.), Style, vol. Ⅳ of A Grammar of New Testament Greek (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1976).Google Scholar

Tyson, Joseph B., “The Date of Acts: A Reconsideration,” Forum 5 (2002), 33–51.Google Scholar

Tyson, Joseph B., “Why Dates Matter: The Case of the Acts of the Apostles,” The Fourth R 18 (2005), 8–14.Google Scholar

Unnik, W. C., “The ‘Book of Acts’ – The Confirmation of the Gospel” in Orton, David E. (ed.), The Composition of Luke's Gospel: Selected Studies from “Novum Testamentum” (Leiden: Brill, 1999).Google Scholar

Unnik, W. C., “Éléments artistiques dans l’évangile de Luc” in Neirynck, Frans (ed.), L’Évangile de Luc, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 32 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Unnik, W. C., “Luke's Second Book and the Rules of Hellenistic Historiography” in Kremer, Jacob (ed.), Les Actes des Apôtres: traditions, rédaction, théologie, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 48 (Gembloux: J. Duculot; Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Usener, H., and Radermacher, L. (eds.), Dionysii Halicarnasei Opuscula, 2 vols. (Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1965).

Verheyden, J. (ed.), The Unity of Luke-Acts, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 142 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).

Verheyden, J. “The Unity of Luke-Acts” in Verheyden, J. (ed.), The Unity of Luke-Acts, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 142 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Vogel, T., Charakteristik des Lukas nach Sprache und Stil: eine philologische Laienstudie, 2nd edition (Leipzig, 1899).Google Scholar

Walton, Steve, “Where Does the Beginning of Acts End?” in Verheyden, J. (ed.), The Unity of Luke-Acts, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 142 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Weil, Henri, The Order of Words in the Ancient Languages Compared with that of the Modern Languages, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series 1: Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800–1925 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V., 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellhausen, Julius, Nachrichten von der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philosophie-Historie Klasse (1907), 1–21.

Wenham, J., “The Identification of Luke,” Evangelical Quarterly 63 (1991), 3–44.Google Scholar

Wilcox, M., “Luke and the Bezan Text of Acts,” in Kremer, J. (ed.), Les Actes des Apôtres: traditions, rédaction, théologie, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 48 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1977), pp. 447–455.

Williams, C. B., Style and Vocabulary: Numerical Studies (London: Charles Griffin, 1970).Google Scholar

Windisch, H., “The Case Against the Tradition” in Jackson, F. J. Foakes and Lake, Kirsopp (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity: Part 1: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. II: Prolegomena Ⅱ: Criticism (London: Macmillan and Co., 1922).Google Scholar

Winston, D., and Dillon, J. (eds.), Two Treatises of Philo of Alexandria: Commentary on De gigantibus and Quod Deus sit immutabilis, Brown Judaic Studies 25 (Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1983).

Winter, Bruce W., and Clarke, Andrew D. (eds.), The Book of Acts in Its First-Century Setting, vol. Ⅰ of The Book of Acts in Its Ancient Literary Setting (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans, 1993).

Wooten, Cecil W. (ed.), The Orator in Action & Theory in Greece & Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy (Leiden: Brill, 2001).CrossRef

Shigetake, Yaginuma, “Plutarch's Language and Style” in Principat Part 2, vol. 33.6, Haase, Wolfgang (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1992).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Heinrich, “Die Sammelberichte der Apostelgeschichte,” Biblische Zeitschrift 5 (1961), 71–82.Google Scholar

Zwaan, J., “The Use of the Greek Language in Acts” in Jackson, F. J. Foakes and , Kirsopp Lake (eds.), The Beginnings of Christianity: Part Ⅰ: The Acts of the Apostles, vol. Ⅱ (London: Macmillan & Co., 1922).Google Scholar

Zwaan, J., “Was the Book of Acts a Posthumous Edition?” Harvard Theological Review 17 (1924), 95–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar