Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T01:42:28.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Public participation and the challenges of environmental justice in China

from Part II - Public participation and access to the judiciary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2009

Jonas Ebbesson
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Phoebe Okowa
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is commonly believed, in China, that the ultimate goal of the legal system is justice. Justice and fairness are closely intertwined in the literature, and in many respects the two terms are used interchangeably. Justice serves more like an ideology or fundamental principle in the Chinese legal context, while fairness, enlightened by justice, has been adopted as an applicable legal principle by civil law and practised widely. Aristotle's theory of justice, in both its distributive and corrective aspects, has been examined by Chinese scholars and used for interpreting functions of law and the legal system. Distributive justice refers to initial allocation of substantive rights or interests, procedures and opportunities by law and legal practice. Corrective justice stands first for the correction of abuse of substantive rights and interests distributed by law, public policy or private agreements; it also reflects the evolution of initially distributed rights and interests and procedures due to changes of social merits concerning overall justice. The latter mode of corrective justice could be regarded as originally distributed rights and interests.

Justice is a dynamic concept with a complex of merits; it ought to fluctuate with the changes of cultural, social and historic conditions. A combination of value in all aspects of a society constitutes a general benchmark of justice, and guides the mainstream of society in justice considerations from time to time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

, Aristotle, 1990. Nicomachean Ethics (trans.), Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Bai, X. M., and Shi, P. J., 2006. ‘Pollution Control in China's Huai River Basin’, Journal of Environment.Google Scholar
Boyle, A., and Anderson, M., 1998. Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cai, S. Q., 2004. Policy framework of Resolution of Environmental Disputes and Enforcement of Environmental Liabilities, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Legislation for Environmental Damage Compensation, 20–21 August 2004, Beijing.
,Central Committee of Chinese Communist Party, 2006. Decisions of the 6th Meeting of the 16th Chinese Communist Party Conference, October 2006.
,China Environmental Protection Foundation, 2006. The Public Report of Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations in China.
Jin, R. L., 1990. Environmental Law Science. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, L., 1999. ‘The Citizen in the Environment – Access to Justice’, 3/3 Resource Management Journal.Google Scholar
Li, C. X., 2006. ‘Prosecutorate Office Intervening Public Litigation’, 3 China Lawyer.
Li, Y. F., 2004. ‘Building Legal Institutions for the Public's Participating in Environmental Protection’. 2 Zhejiang Social Science.Google Scholar
, Z. M., 2004. ‘Probing Environmental Litigation – Is Environmental Litigation Existing?’, in , Z. M., (ed.), Environmental and Natural Resource Law Study, vol. 3. Beijing: Law Science Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., 2004. ‘Environmental Protection and Social Fairness’, People's Net.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1998. A Theory of Justice (trans. Haihong He, Baogang He and Shenbao Liao). Beijing: China Social Science Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Y. C., 2006. ‘An Analytical Study of Some Problems Concerning Litigation Constitutions for Public Environmental Welfare’, 26/3 Modern Law Science.Google Scholar
Tao, H. Y., 1990. ‘Citizen litigation in American Environmental Law’, 6 Journal of Law Review.Google Scholar
Wall, M. E., 2006. ‘Public Interest Litigation in the US’, Paper presented at the Seminar of Comparative Study of Environmental Public Participation of Natural Resources Defense Council, 10 November 2006.
, Weng, T. A., and , Hu, D. C., 2004. ‘Several Thoughts on the Public's Participating in Environmental Impact Assessment’, 1 Times of Law Science.Google Scholar
Yutong, L., 2006. ‘Standings of Environmental Public Litigation’, 10 Frontier.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×