Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T02:15:09.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Gender, sexuality and power in early modern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2009

Brian J. Gibbons
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

In the predominant view of the feminine in the early modern period, women were regarded as passive, sexually voracious and morally suspect, both in their own behaviour and in their effects on men. Inherently irrational, representing the flesh and its snares, women were assigned a subordinate status in the prevalent ideology. By the nineteenth century these perceptions of the feminine had been revised in women's favour by the rise of ‘Victorian sexual ideology’, involving what might be called the Romantic notion of women. A key element in this process was the desexualisation of the image of women, accompanied by a general repressive attitude to sexuality. Women were still perceived as essentially passive, but a new understanding of female passionlessness had arisen, enabling the feminine to be regarded as spiritually elevating. The middle-class woman in particular was now an ‘agent of salvation’, ‘a desexualized Madonna’. These changed perceptions were potentially empowering for women, laying the groundwork for the rise of feminism.

It should be emphasised that these remarks are intended to describe only the dominant trends in sexual ideology. Attitudes to gender and sexuality are complex and often contradictory. The grossest misogyny and an excessive adulation of women can be found in all ages; the reader of Nunnery tales (a popular pornographic magazine) is likely to form a different impression of Victorian women's sexual reserve than the reader of Ruskin's Sesame and lilies. Sara Heller Mendelson's remarks on the process of mate selection might well be applied more generally: ‘Romanticism and cynicism could dwell side by side in the same milieu, the same family, even the same breast.’ Such complexities and contradictions pose a major methodological problem.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gender in Mystical and Occult Thought
Behmenism and its Development in England
, pp. 20 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×