Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:39:38.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Historical and comparative remarks on the ‘federal principle’ in higher education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Sheldon Rothblatt
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

PROLEGOMENA: VANISHING IDENTITIES

Universities today arrive packaged in every conceivable shape and style. We should not be surprised. In its long and impressive history as a distinct institution within western civilisation, the university has never assumed a single form or followed a single pattern, nor, despite undeniable similarities in organisation and curriculum, has one university been a carbon copy of another. National differences of organisation, mission and curriculum have been plentiful; and within nations themselves numerous forms have coexisted.

This remains the situation, and if anything the variety of types has multiplied even more in the hospitable environments of our own century. In Austria and Germany many ‘universities’ of that designation are relatively specialised institutions, wirtschaftsuniversitäten or technische universitäten. Austria established a University of Mining at Leoben and a University of Educational Services at Klagenfurt. In the 1990s more than half of all French universities offered programmes of study confined to a limited range of specialties. In the fomer Soviet bloc, exclusively focused universities were established in conformity with communist government policy to concentrate on applied subjects. A University of Economics was established in Hungary in 1948, followed in the next year by a University of Heavy Industries and two years later by a University of Chemical Industry. In Stockholm, Lyngley (near Copenhagen), Paris, Lausanne, Zurich, Berlin, Vienna, London and Cambridge, Massachusetts, high-prestige engineering establishments have long flourished. They do not carry the hallowed name ‘university’, but this has not been a drawback.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Modern University and its Discontents
The Fate of Newman's Legacies in Britain and America
, pp. 229 - 299
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×