Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Adaptation now
- Part I Adapting to thresholds in physical and ecological systems
- Part II The role of values and culture in adaptation
- Part III Governance, knowledge and technologies for adaptation
- 20 Whether our levers are long enough and the fulcrum strong? Exploring the soft underbelly of adaptation decisions and actions
- 21 Decentralized planning and climate adaptation: toward transparent governance
- 22 Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods
- 23 Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future
- 24 Climate change, international cooperation and adaptation in transboundary water management
- 25 Decentralization: a window of opportunity for successful adaptation to climate change?
- 26 Adapting to climate change in Sámi reindeer herding: the nation-state as problem and solution
- 27 Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints
- 28 Accessing diversification, networks and traditional resource management as adaptations to climate extremes
- 29 Governance limits to effective global financial support for adaptation
- 30 Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development
- 31 Conclusions: Transforming the world
- Index
- References
24 - Climate change, international cooperation and adaptation in transboundary water management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Adaptation now
- Part I Adapting to thresholds in physical and ecological systems
- Part II The role of values and culture in adaptation
- Part III Governance, knowledge and technologies for adaptation
- 20 Whether our levers are long enough and the fulcrum strong? Exploring the soft underbelly of adaptation decisions and actions
- 21 Decentralized planning and climate adaptation: toward transparent governance
- 22 Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods
- 23 Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future
- 24 Climate change, international cooperation and adaptation in transboundary water management
- 25 Decentralization: a window of opportunity for successful adaptation to climate change?
- 26 Adapting to climate change in Sámi reindeer herding: the nation-state as problem and solution
- 27 Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints
- 28 Accessing diversification, networks and traditional resource management as adaptations to climate extremes
- 29 Governance limits to effective global financial support for adaptation
- 30 Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development
- 31 Conclusions: Transforming the world
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The recently published report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) suggests clear evidence of climate change impacts. Global average air and ocean temperatures are rising. As a result, snow and ice are melting, leading to a rise in sea levels. Extreme weather events and hazards, such as flooding, heat waves and cyclones, are becoming more frequent, and the geographical and temporal clustering of precipitation patterns is shifting. In short, our hydrologic and ecological systems are changing. While an extensive body of literature has already developed around the question of international cooperation as a necessary prerequisite for mitigating climate change (Dunn and Falvin, 2002; Haas, 2004; Caney, 2005), other research indicates that some of its effects are already irreversible (IPCC, 2007). Thus scholars are also increasingly examining the possible role of international cooperation in the adaptation to climate change impacts.
There are at least three distinct roles for international cooperation in climate change mitigation and adaptation, which differ from each other in terms of their global communitarian basis. First, international cooperation can lead to positive-sum outcomes for the particular states involved. For example, the pooling of resources for the provision of public goods such as data, information and know-how, if shared in a non-exclusive way, can produce positive externalities. Second, confidence-building measures between two or more states can help to avoid conflicts over the use of increasingly uncertain stocks and flows of some internationally shared resources.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adapting to Climate ChangeThresholds, Values, Governance, pp. 384 - 398Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
and 1999. ‘Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2005. ‘Adapting to climate change: perspectives across scales’, Global Environmental Change 15: 75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. ‘Cognitive evolution: a dynamic approach for the study of international relations and their progress’, in and (eds.) Progress in Postwar International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 43–88.Google Scholar
, , , , , , , , , , and 2006. ‘Adaptive management of the global climate problem: bridging the gap between climate research and climate policy’, Climatic Change 78: 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. ‘Flexibility provisions in multilateral environmental treaties’, International Environmental Agreements 6: 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility and global climate change’, Leiden Journal of International Law 18: 747–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘From headwater tributaries to international river: observing and adapting to climate variability and change in the Nile basin’, Global Environmental Change 15: 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2003. ‘Social vulnerability to environmental hazards’, Social Science Quarterly 84: 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2008. ‘Governance mechanisms to address flow variability in water treaties’, Global Environmental Change 18: 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2003. ‘The struggle to govern the commons’, Science 302: 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2002. ‘Moving the climate change agenda forward’, in (ed.) State of the World 2002. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, pp. 24–50.Google Scholar
and 1999. Identification of Joint Management Structures for Shared Aquifers: A Comparative Palestinian–Israeli Effort, World Bank Technical Paper No. 415. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Legal and institutional adaptation to climate uncertainty: a study of international rivers’, Water Policy 6: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. ‘Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research’, Global Environmental Change 17: 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1961. ‘International integration: the European and the universal process’, International Organization 15: 366–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization 46: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘Addressing the global governance deficit’, Global Environmental Politics 4: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. ‘Patterns in international water resource treaties: the transboundary freshwater dispute database’, Yearbook of the Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 1997: pp. 157–177.Google Scholar
2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
1997. Judgement in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo–Nagymaros Project. Available at www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/92/7375.pdf?PHPSESSID=1d5b3126d354b2c0c026ad4540a232f6 (accessed 26 February 2008).
2004. ‘Post-sovereign environmental governance’, Global Environmental Politics 4: 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. ‘The need for flexibility in freshwater treaty regimes’, Natural Resources Forum 27: 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2001. ‘Situation structure and institutional design: reciprocity, coercion, and exchange’, International Organization 55: 891–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. ‘Explaining cooperation under anarchy: hypothesis and strategies’, World Politics 38: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. ‘Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change’, Paper presented at the International Conference on Integrated Assessment of Water Resources and Global Change: A North–South Analysis, 23–25 February, Bonn, Germany.
2005. ‘The rational choice of international institutions: Uncertainty and flexibility in the climate regime’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1–4 September, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
. Transboundary Freshwater Disputes Database. Available at www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu
2002. Vital Water Graphics. Available at www.unep.org/dewa/assessments/ecosystems/water/vitalwater/03.htm
1969. Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, 331. Washington, DC: United Nations.Google Scholar
, , , , , , , , and 2002. ‘Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach’, Conservation Ecology 6: 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. ‘One resource, two visions: the prospects for Israeli–Palestinian water cooperation’, Water International 27: 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘Indigenous approaches to water conflict resolution and implications for international waters’, Paper presented at Conference on Water and Food Security in the Middle East, April 20–23, Nicosia, Cyprus.
1999. ‘Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict’, Natural Resources Forum 23: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by