Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:33:27.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Preempting future regulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Thomas P. Lyon
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
John W. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

While some of the environmental changes now emerging in corporate America are genuine and welcome, a good many are superficial, some are downright diversionary, and a few are being specifically designed to preempt more stringent public policies from emerging.

(Brent Blackwelder, President, Friends of the Earth, quoted in Smart 1992)

In an effort to head off legal restrictions on privately traded derivatives, six of Wall Street's biggest securities firms have agreed to voluntarily tighten their controls on the most hotly contested aspects of their derivatives sales and trading.

(Wall Street Journal, March 9, 1995, p. C1)

In today's society any industry as conspicuous as the major home appliance industry is continually faced with the threat of government regulation. In my opinion, the only way to avoid government regulation is to move faster than the government. The alternative to government regulation is judicious self-regulation.

(Herbert Phillips, Technical Director, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, quoted in Hunt 1975)

To economists, “regulation” means restraints imposed upon firms by government. In many cases, however, firms voluntarily restrain their own conduct; they “self-regulate.” While this book is obviously focused on corporate environmental performance, self-regulation is a much broader phenomenon. Examples from other contexts include establishment of financial exchanges, licensing of professionals, setting of safety standards, control of entertainment content, and advertising restrictions. While self-regulation may have a variety of motives, in this chapter we model it as a way to preempt the passage of new government regulations, examining the conditions under which preemption is possible and, if it occurs, its welfare consequences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×