Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Charts, Tables, and Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Has Europe Lost Its Heart?
- 2 Economic Implications of the Social Provisions of the Stalled EU Constitution
- 3 Fiscal Policy and Fiscal Rules in the European Union
- 4 Design and Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact: The Perspective of New Member States
- 5 Perspectives on the Lisbon Strategy: How to Increase European Competitiveness
- 6 Is Europe Reforming? Evidence from Cross-Country Structural Indicators
- 7 Recovery Growth as a Stage of Post-Socialist Transition
- 8 Comparative Oligarchy: Russia, Ukraine, and the United States
- 9 The Economic Rationale of the “European Neighbourhood Policy”
- 10 Economic Integration of Eurasia: Opportunities and Challenges of Global Significance
- Index
- References
7 - Recovery Growth as a Stage of Post-Socialist Transition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 December 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Charts, Tables, and Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Has Europe Lost Its Heart?
- 2 Economic Implications of the Social Provisions of the Stalled EU Constitution
- 3 Fiscal Policy and Fiscal Rules in the European Union
- 4 Design and Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact: The Perspective of New Member States
- 5 Perspectives on the Lisbon Strategy: How to Increase European Competitiveness
- 6 Is Europe Reforming? Evidence from Cross-Country Structural Indicators
- 7 Recovery Growth as a Stage of Post-Socialist Transition
- 8 Comparative Oligarchy: Russia, Ukraine, and the United States
- 9 The Economic Rationale of the “European Neighbourhood Policy”
- 10 Economic Integration of Eurasia: Opportunities and Challenges of Global Significance
- Index
- References
Summary
The complexity of post-socialist transition was unprecedented. Initially, no one could accurately predict its pace or foresee how soon and to what extent it would be accomplished.
For example, when Solidarity's victory in the 1989 elections opened the “window of opportunity” for Polish reformers, it was impossible to assess the extent of Poland's problems and foresee the difficulties that would arise as the society and the economy adapted to market conditions. But today the stage of transformational recession, as well as the discussion about its causes and consequences, belongs to the past. Although major difficulties still have to be overcome, the economies of post-socialist countries largely display stable GDP growth and effective market mechanisms.
Transformational recession can be explained rather simply. The dismantling of the socialist economic structure revealed a sad circumstance: a substantial part of the economic activities carried out under socialism would never be needed in a market economy or democracy. The redistribution of resources concentrated in those activities cannot occur overnight. Processes that occurred at this stage of post-socialist recession were reminiscent of what Joseph Schumpeter (1950) described as “creative destruction,” but they occurred on a scale unprecedented for market economies. It is vital to understand that both post-socialist recession (the adaptive decrease in production) and the subsequent recovery are part and parcel of a single process, whose essence is the structural rebuilding of the economy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Europe after Enlargement , pp. 127 - 142Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
. 2001. “Structure and Context in the Study of Post-Soviet Russia: Several Empirical Generalizations in Search of a Theory.” Russian Outlook. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
. 2002. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1925. “‘O vosstanovitelnyh protzessah’ voobshche i ob ‘emissionnyh vozmozhnostyah’ v chastnosty (On ‘Recovery Processes’ in General and ‘Issuing Possibilities’ in Particular).” Ekonomicheskoe Obozrenie 1. Moscow.Google Scholar
, , , and . 1999. “The Evolution of Output in Transition Economies: Explaining the Differences.” IMF Working Paper 73. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. 1994. The Economic Transformation of the Soviet Union, 1913–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Melo, Martha, Cevdet Denizer, and Alan Gelb. 1997. “From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition.” In and , eds., Macroeconomic Stabilization in Transition Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “The Russian Economy Under El'tsin.” Europe-Asia Studies 52, no. 8: 1417–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and . 2004. “Faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta rossiyskoi ekonomiki (Factors of Economic Growth in the Russian Economy).” Institute for the Economy in Transition Working Paper 70. Moscow: Institute for the Economy in Transition.Google Scholar
. 2003. Rossiya na rubezhe vekov (Russia at the Turn of the Century). Moscow: Ekonomika.Google Scholar
2002. “Has Russia Entered a Period of Sustainable Economic Growth?” In , ed., Russia After the Fall. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
. 1925a. “O nekotoryh zakonomernostyah, empiricheski obnaruzhivaemyh v nashem narodnom khozyaystve (On Some Regularities in National Economy Established Through Experiments).” Planovoe Khozyaystvo, 1–2.Google Scholar
. 1925b. “Konyunkturnyj obzor narodnovo khozyaystva SSSR za pervoe polugodie 1924 i 1925 goda (Survey of the National Economy of the USSR in the First Six Months of 1924 and 1925).” Planovoe Khozyaystvo, 6.Google Scholar
. 2006. Divergent Paths in Post-Communist Transformation: Capitalism for All or Capitalism for the Few?Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. “Growth in Transition Countries 1991–1998: The Main Lessons.” Paper presented at the conference “A Decade of Transition,” International Monetary Fund, February 1–3, 1999, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
, , and . 1998. “Recovery and Growth in Transition Economies 1990–1997: A Stylized Regression Analysis.” IMF Working Paper 141. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Hearing Before the U.S. Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration. 2002. “The Status of the Russian Federation as a Non-Market Economy Country Under the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws.” Comments by Z. Blake Marshall. Http://www.usrbc.org/Transcripts-Summaries-testimonies/2002/Commerce%20Hearing%20march%2027.asp.
International Monetary Fund. 2000. World Economic Outlook: Focus on Transition Economies. Washington, D.C.: IMF, October.
International Monetary Fund. 2003. International Financial Statistics Yearbook, 2003. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2004. International Financial Statistics Yearbook, 2004. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2005. International Financial Statistics Yearbook, 2005. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States. 2004. The Commonwealth of Independent States in 2003: Statistical Yearbook. Moscow: The Interstate Statistical Committee of the CIS.
Kafengaus, Lev B. 1994. “Evolyutziya promyshlennovo proizvodstva v Rossii: poslednyaya tret' XIX – 30-ye gody XX v. (Evolution of Industrial Production in Russia: The Last Thirty Years of the 19th Century and the First 30 Years of the 20th Century).” Moscow.
“Kontrolnye tzifry narodnovo khozyaystva na 1925–1926 gody. Utverzhdennyj prezidiumom Gosplana SSSR doklad komissii po kontrolnym tzifram (Planned Targets of the National Economy for the 1925–1926 Period. Report of the Commission on Planned Targets approved by the Presidium of the State Planning Committee of the USSR).” 1925. Planovoe Khozyaystvo. Moscow.
. 1994. “Transformational Recession: The Main Causes.” Journal of Comparative Economics 19: 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1929. “Osnovnye problemy kontrolnyh tzifr narodnogo khozyaystva na 1928–1929 (Principal Issues of Planned Targets of the National Economy in 1928–1929).” Planovoe Khozyastvo. Moscow.Google Scholar
. 1964. Istoriya tsenoobrazovaniya v SSSR: 1917–1963 (History of Price Formation in the USSR: 1917–1963). Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Narodnoye khozyaystvo RSFSR za 60 lyet (The National Economy of the RSFSR in the Past 60 Years). 1977. Moscow: Roskomstat.
1999. Transition Strategies: Choices and Outcomes. Princeton, N.J.:International Finance Section.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2003. The World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
, ed. 2000. Kak lomali NEP: stenogrammy plenumov TSK VKP(b) 1928–1929 gg (How the New Economic Policy (NEP) Was Liquidated: Records of Plenums of the Central Committee of the VKP(b) in 1928–1929). Moscow: Rossia XX vek.Google Scholar
. 1996. Dyenyezhnaya politika sovetskoy vlasti: 1917–1927 (Monetary Policy of the Soviet Government: 1917–1927). Moscow: Nachala-Press.Google Scholar