Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T14:46:29.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Theory in landscape ecology

from PART II - Theory, experiments, and models in landscape ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

By
R. V. O'Neill
Edited by
John A. Wiens  and
Michael R. Moss
R. V. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge USA
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC
Michael R. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

Over the past decade, landscape ecology has seen a period of remarkable progress. Remote imagery has provided new access to spatial data. Geographic information systems (GIS) have facilitated the handling, analysis, and display of spatial data. New theory has provided the means to quantify pattern (O'Neill et al., 1988a), test hypotheses against random expectations (Gardner et al., 1987), and come to grips with complexity (Milne, 1991) and scale (Turner et al., 1993). The stage seems set for breakthroughs in the new millennium. Nowhere in the field of ecology is there greater promise, nowhere are there more exciting challenges.

This paper has a simple outline. The following sections review four areas of theory that have been applied to spatial effects in ecology. Each theory is then examined to identify the key advances that will be needed to apply the theory to our understanding of landscape dynamics. The intent is to propose an explicit list of major challenges for landscape theory.

Hierarchy theory and landscape scale

The concept of spatial hierarchy has already proven its value. Hierarchy theory (Allen and Starr, 1982; O'Neill et al., 1986) states that ecosystem processes are organized into discrete scales of interaction. The scaled temporal dynamics, in turn, impose discrete spatial scales on the landscape. O'Neill et al. (1991) examined vegetation transects from four ecosystems and established that multiple scales of pattern actually existed in the field.

Type
Chapter
Information
Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology , pp. 23 - 28
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. F. H. and Starr, T. B. (1982). Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Andow, D. A., Kareiva, P. M., Levin, S. A., and Okubo, A. (1990). Spread of invading organisms. Landscape Ecology, 4, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, C. D. and Brown, J. H. (1974). Fish species diversity in lakes. American Naturalist, 108, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, B. J. L. and Pred, A. (1961). Central Place Studies: a Bibliography. Philadelphia, PA: Regional Studies Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dale, V. H., O'Neill, R. V., Pedlowski, M., and Southworth, F. (1993). Causes and effects of land use change in central Rondonia, Brazil. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, 997–1005.Google Scholar
Durrett, R. and Levin, S. A. (1994). Stochastic spatial models: a user's guide to ecological applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 343, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, C. J. (1929). Alfred Weber's Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. H., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., and O'Neill, R. V. (1987). Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V., Turner, M. G., and Dale, V. H. (1989). Quantifying scale dependent effects with simple percolation models. Landscape Ecology, 3, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. H. and O'Neill, R. V. (1991). Pattern, process and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (ed.) (1966). Von Thunen's Isolated State. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. (1983). Coexistence of competitors in patchy environments. Ecology, 64, 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds.) (1997). Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Healey, M. J. and Ilbery, B. W. (1990). Location and Change: Perspectives on Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1992). Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62, 447–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C. B. (1958). Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator– prey oscillations. Hilgardia, 27, 343–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, W. (1960). Methods of Regional Analysis: an Introduction to Regional Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D. W. and O'Neill, R. V. (1993). Human–environmental influences and interactions in shifting agriculture when farmers form expectations rationally. Environment and Planning A, 25, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. W. and O'Neill, R. V. (1994). Development policies, rural land use, and tropical deforestation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, 753–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. W. and O'Neill, R. V. (1995). Development policies, urban unemployment and deforestation: the role of infrastructure and tax policy in a 2-sector model. Journal of Regional Science, 35, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotliar, N. B. and Wiens, J. A. (1990). Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos, 59, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, D. (1942). Ecological features of the bird fauna of British small islands. Journal of Animal Ecology, 11, 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavorel, S., Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V., and Burch, J. B. (1994). Spatiotemporal dispersal strategies and annual plant-species coexistence in a structured landscape. Oikos, 71, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. A. (1976). Population dynamic models in heterogeneous environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 7, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1970). Extinctions. In Some Mathematical Questions in Biology: Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
Losch, A. (1954). The Economics of Location. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. (1963). An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 17, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, B. T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H. (1986). A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H., et al. (1988a). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., and Gardner, R. H. (1988b). Resource utilization scales and landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 2, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Turner, S. J., Cullinan, V. I., et al. (1991). Multiple landscape scales: an intersite comparison. Landscape Ecology, 5, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., Turner, M. G., and Romme, W. H. (1992a). Epidemiology theory and disturbance spread on landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 7, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., and Turner, M. G. (1992b). A hierarchical neutral model for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology, 7, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnick, R. E., Gardner, R. H., and O'Neill, R. V. (1993). Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecology, 8, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D., Hobbs, R. J., and Margules, C. R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology, 5, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, F., Dale, V. H., and O'Neill, R. V. (1991). Contrasting patterns of land use in Rondonia, Brazil: simulating the effects on carbon release. International Social Science Journal, 43, 681–698.Google Scholar
Thoman, R. S., Conkling, E. C., and Yeates, M. H. (1962). The Geography of Economic Activity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., Dale, V. H., and O'Neill, R. V. (1989). Predicting the spread of disturbances across heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos, 55, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V., and Kratz, T. K. (1993). A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 8, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S. J., O'Neill, R. V., Conley, W., Conley, M. R., and Humphries, H. C. (1991). Pattern and scale: statistics for landscape ecology. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, D., O'Neill, R. V., and Shugart, H. H. (1987). Landscape ecology. BioScience, 37, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. L., Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., O'Neill, R. V., and Wu, Y. (1995). Scale of heterogeneity of forage production and winter foraging by elk and bison. Landscape Ecology, 10, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A. S. (1947). Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology, 35, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Theory in landscape ecology
    • By R. V. O'Neill, Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge USA
  • Edited by John A. Wiens, The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC, Michael R. Moss, University of Guelph, Ontario
  • Book: Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology
  • Online publication: 20 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614415.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Theory in landscape ecology
    • By R. V. O'Neill, Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge USA
  • Edited by John A. Wiens, The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC, Michael R. Moss, University of Guelph, Ontario
  • Book: Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology
  • Online publication: 20 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614415.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Theory in landscape ecology
    • By R. V. O'Neill, Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge USA
  • Edited by John A. Wiens, The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC, Michael R. Moss, University of Guelph, Ontario
  • Book: Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology
  • Online publication: 20 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614415.004
Available formats
×