Abordonado, V. 1998, The Effect of Gender on Linguistic Politeness in Written Discourse, PhD thesis, University of Arizona

Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1983, ‘The clanger phenomenon: the nondeviant nature of deviant utterances’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 41–57Google Scholar

Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1985a, ‘Improving emotive communication: verbal, prosodic, and kinesic conflict avoidance techniques’, Per Linguam 1: 21–33Google Scholar

Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1985b, ‘Politeness revisited: cross-modal supportive strategies’, IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 23(4): 281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1987, InterGrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Arundale, R. 1999, ‘An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative politeness theory’, Pragmatics 9: 119–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aston, G. 1995, ‘Say “Thank you”: some pragmatic constraints in conversational closing’, Applied Linguistics 16(1): 57–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Austin, P. 1990, ‘Politeness revisited: the dark side’, in Bell, A. and Holmes, J. (eds.), New Zealand Ways of Speaking English. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 277–93

Axia, G. and Baroni, M. R. 1985, ‘Linguistic politeness at different age levels’, Child Development 56(4): 918–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Harris, S. J. 1996, ‘Requests and status in business correspondence’, Journal of Pragmatics 28: 635–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, N. 2001, Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where it's Heading, London: Routledge

Baroni, M.-R. and Axia, G. 1989, ‘Children's meta-pragmatic abilities and the identification of polite and impolite requests’, First Language 9(3): 285–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, E. and Silvern, L. 1977, ‘Social adjustment and politeness in preschoolers’, Journal of Communication 27(2): 104–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bauman, R. 1981, ‘Christ respects no man's person: the plain language of the early quakers and the rhetoric of impoliteness’, Sociolinguistic Working Paper 88, University of Texas, Austin, TX

Baumgartner, A. 1908, Lehrgang der englischen Sprache: II. Teil: Lesebuch, 7th edition, Zürich: Orell Füssli

Bayraktaroğlu, A. 1991, ‘Politeness and interactional imbalance’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92: 5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayraktaroğlu, A. 1992, ‘Disagreement in Turkish trouble-talk’, Text 12: 317–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayraktaroğlu, A. 2000, ‘A repair mechanism in Turkish conversation: the case of EstagПfurullah’, Multilingua 1993: 281–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, J. A. and Smenner, P. C. 1986, ‘The spontaneous use of “Thank you” by preschoolers as a function of sex, socioeconomic status, and listener status’, Language in Society 15(4): 537–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, M. B. 1988, Civility and Society in Western Europe, 1300–1600, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press

Beebe, L. and Takahashi, T. 1989, ‘“Do you have a bag?”: social status and patterned variation in second language acquisition’, in Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D. and Selinker, L. (eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Discourse and Pragmatics, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 103–25

Beinhauer, W. 1930, Spanische Umgangssprache, Bonn: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlag

Bellegarde, Abbé de 1696, L'art de connaître les hommes, Paris

Bellegarde, Abbé de ([1698] 1717), Reflexions upon the Politeness of Manners, London

Bentahila, A. and Davies, E. 1989, ‘Culture and language use: a problem for foreign language teaching’, IRAL 27(2): 99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergson, H. 1945, Discours sur la politesse, Paris: Editions Colbert

Bex, A. 1999, ‘Representations of English in twentieth-century Britain: Fowler, Gowers and Partridge’, in Bex, A. and Watts, R. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate, London: Routledge, 89–109

Biq, Y. 1984, ‘Indirect speech acts in Chinese polite expressions’, Journal of the Chinese Teachers Association 19(3): 1–10Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1982, ‘Learning how to say what you mean in a language’, Applied Linguistics 3: 29–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1983, ‘Interpreting and performing speech acts in a second language: a cross-cultural study of Hebrew and English’, in Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, pp. 36–55

Blum-Kulka, S. 1985, ‘Modifiers as indicating devices: same or different?’, Theoretical Linguistics 12(2/3): 213–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1987, ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?’, Journal of Pragmatics 11(1): 131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1989, ‘Playing it safe: the role of conventionality in indirectness’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 37–70

Blum-Kulka, S. 1990, ‘You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: parental politeness in family discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 259–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1992, ‘The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society’, in Watts, R. J., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 255–80

Blum-Kulka, S. 1994, ‘Review of Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Crosscultural Perspective by Maria Sifianou’, Pragmatics and Cognition 2(2): 349–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1997, ‘Discourse pragmatics’, in van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2. London: Sage, pp. 38–63

Blum-Kulka, S., Danet, B. and Gerson, R. 1985, ‘The language of requesting in Israeli society’, in Forgas, J. (ed.), Language and Social Situation. New York: Springer, pp. 113–41

Blum-Kulka, S. and House, J. 1989, ‘Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 123–54

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.) 1989, Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Blum-Kulka, S. and Kasper, G. (eds.) 1990, ‘Politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 14

Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. 1984, ‘Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)’, Applied Linguistics 5(3): 196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. and Weizman, E. 1988, ‘The inevitability of misunderstandings: discourse ambiguities’, Text 8: 219–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press

Bourdieu, P. 1991, Language and Symbolic Power, edited by J. Thompson and translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson, Cambridge: Polity Press

Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. 1990 [1977], Reproduction in Education Society and Culture, London: Sage

Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. and de Saint Martin, M. 1994, Academic Discourse, Cambridge: Polity Press

Boyer, A. 1702, The English Theophrastus: or, The Manners of the Age, Ann Arbor: Augustan Reprint Society, 1947

Braun, F. 1988, Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Brown, P. 1976, ‘Women and politeness: a new perspective on language and society’, Review in Anthropology 3: 240–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. 1980, ‘How and why are women more polite? Some evidence from a Mayan community’, in McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R. and Furman, N. (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger, pp. 111–36

Brown, P. 1990, ‘Gender, politeness, and confrontation in Tenejapa’, Discourse Processes 13(1): 123–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. 1994, ‘Gender, politeness, and confrontation in Tenejapa’, in Tannen, D. (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–62

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1978, ‘Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena’, in Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and Politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–289

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Brown, R. 1990, ‘Politeness theory: exemplar and exemplary’, in Rock, I. (ed.), The Legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in Cognition and Social Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 23–38

Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960, ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 253–76

Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1989, ‘Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies’, Language in Society 18(2): 159–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bumke, J. 1986, Höfische Kultur, Munich: dtv

Burstein, J. 1989, ‘Politeness strategies and gender expectations’, CUNY Forum: Papers in Linguistics 14: 31–7Google Scholar

Bury, E. 1992, ‘Civiliser la “personne” ou instituer le “personnage”? Les deux versants de la politesse selon les théoriciens français du XVIIe siècle’, in Montandon, A. (ed.), Etiquette et politesse, Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 125–38

Bustamante Lopez, I. and Murcia, M. 1995, ‘Impositive speech acts in Northern Andean Spanish: a pragmatic description’, Hispania: a Journal Devoted to the Interests of the Teaching of Spanish and Portuguese 78(4): 885–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callières, F. de. 1972 [1693], Du bon et du mauvais usage, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints

Campbell, K. 1990, ‘Explanations in negative messages: more insights from speech act theory’, Journal of Business Communication 27(4): 357–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carré, J. 1994a, ‘Ethique et politesse des élites foncières anglaises (1750–1850)’, QWERTY: Arts, Littératures et Civilisations du Monde Anglophone 4: 339–45Google Scholar

Carré, J. 1994b, ‘The lady and the poor man; or, the philanthropist's etiquette’, in Carré, J. (ed.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900. Leiden: Brill, pp. 157–66

Carré, J. (ed.) 1994c, The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900, Leiden: Brill

Castiglione, B. [1528] 1966, The Book of the Courtier, New York: Dutton Everyman (first published 1516)

Chilman, C. 1980, ‘Parent satisfactions, concerns and goals for their children’, Family Relations 29: 339–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chitoran, D. 1987, ‘The erosion of the boundaries between theoretical and applied linguistics: evidence from speech act theory’, in Tomic, O. and Shuy, R. (eds.), The Relation of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 115–38

Chomsky, N. 1972, Studies in Semantics in Generative Grammar, The Hague: Mouton

Clark, H. 1979, ‘Responding to indirect speech acts’, Cognitive Psychology 11: 430–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. and Schunk, D. 1975, ‘Polite responses to polite requests’, Cognition 8: 111–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. and Schunk, D. 1980, ‘Understanding what is meant from what is said: a study in conversationally conveyed results’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 56–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. and Schunk, D. 1981, ‘Politeness in requests: a rejoinder to Kemper and Thissen’, Cognition 9: 311–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, H. M. 1997, ‘The role of the Japanese masu form in caregiver–child conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 28(6): 695–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulmas, F. 1979, ‘On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae’, Journal of Pragmatics 3: 239–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulmas, F. 1981a, “Poison to your soul': thanks and apologies contrastively viewed', in Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational Routine, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 69–93

Coulmas, F. (ed.) 1981, Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, The Hague: Mouton

Coulmas, F. 1987, ‘Keigo–Höflichkeit und soziale Bedeutung im Japanischen’, Linguistische Berichte 107: 44–62Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. 1992, ‘Linguistic etiquette in Japanese society’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 299–323

Coupland, N., Grainger, K. and Coupland, J. 1988, ‘Politeness in context: intergenerational issues’, Language in Society 17(2): 253–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, T. 1989, The Politics of Discourse: the Standard Language Question and British Cultural Debates, London: Macmillan

Crystal, D. and Devey, D. 1969, Investigating English Style, London: Longman

Culpeper, J. 1996, ‘Towards an anatomy of impoliteness’, Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kadt, E. 1992, ‘Politeness phenomena in South African Black English’, Pragmatics and Language Learning 3: 103–116Google Scholar

Kadt, E. 1994, ‘Towards a model for the study of politeness in Zulu’, South African Journal of African Languages/Suid Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Afrikatale 14(3): 103–12Google Scholar

Kadt, E. 1995, ‘“I must be seated to talk to you”: taking nonverbal politeness strategies into account’, Pragmatics and Language Learning. Monograph Series 6Google Scholar

Kadt, E. 1998, ‘The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language’, Journal of Pragmatics 29: 173–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

della Casa, G. [1558] 1958, Galateo, Harmondsworth: Penguin

Descartes, R. 1637, Discours de la méthode, Amsterdam

Diamond, J. 1996, Status and Power in Verbal Interaction, Amsterdam: Benjamins

DuFon, M., Kasper, G., Takahashi, S. and Yoshinaga, N. 1994, ‘Bibliography on linguistic politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 527–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupin, H. 1931, La courtoisie au Moyen Age, Paris: Picard

Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. 1992, ‘Think practically and look locally: language and gender as community-based practice’, Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmondson, W. 1977, A Pedagogic Grammar of the English Verb: a Handbook for the German Secondary Teacher of English, Tübingen: Narr

Edmondson, W. and House, J. 1982, ‘Höflichkeit als Lernziel im Englisch-unterricht’, Neusprachliche Mitteilungen 35(4): 218–27Google Scholar

Eelen, G. 1999, ‘Politeness and ideology: a critical review’, Pragmatics 9(1): 163–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eelen, G. 2001, A Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester: St Jerome

Ehlich, K. 1992, ‘On the historicity of politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 71–107

Ehlich, K. 1993, ‘HIAT: A transcription system for discourse data’, in Edwards, J. and Lampert, M. (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123–48

Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1976, ‘Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen’, Linguistische Berichte 45: 21–41Google Scholar

Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1979, ‘Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT 2): Intonation’, Linguistische Berichte 59: 51–75Google Scholar

Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1981, ‘Zur Notierung nonverbaler Kommunikation für diskursive Zwecke (Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen HIAT 2)’, in Winkler, P. (ed.), Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face-Situationen, Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 302–329)

Elias, N. 1939, The History of Manners: the Civilizing Process, New York: Pantheon, 1978

Eliasoph, N. 1987, ‘Politeness, power, and women's language: rethinking study in language and gender’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 79–103Google Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. 1972, ‘Sociolinguistic rules of address’, in Pride, J. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 225–41

Ervin-Tripp, S. 1979, ‘How to make and to understand a request’, in Parret, H. and Sbisa, M. (eds.) Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino 1979. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 195–210

Ervin-Tripp, S., Guo, J. and Lampert, M. 1990, ‘Politeness and persuasion in children's control acts’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. 1989, ‘Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, pp. 221–48

Faret, N. 1632, L'honnête homme, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970

Ferguson, C. 1967, ‘Root–echo responses in Syrian Arabic politeness formulas’, in Stuart, D. (eds.), Linguistic Studies in Memory of Richard Slade Harrell. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 35–45

Ferguson, C. 1983, ‘God wishes in Syrian Arabic’, Mediterranean Review 1: 65–83Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. 1976, ‘The structure and use of politeness formulas’, Language in Society 5(2): 137–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flowerdew, J. 1991, ‘Pragmatic modifications on the “representative” speech act of defining’, Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 253–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

France, P. 1992, Politeness and its Discontents: Problems in French Classical Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fraser, B. 1975, ‘Hedged performatives’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 187–210

Fraser, B. 1980, ‘Conversational mitigation’, Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, B. 1990, ‘Perspectives on politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 219–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, B. and Nolen, W. 1981, ‘The association of deference with linguistic form’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93–111Google Scholar

Fraser, B., Rintell, E. and Walters, J. 1980, ‘An approach to conducting: research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language’, in Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed.), Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research, Rowley, MA: Newbury, pp. 75–91

Fukushima, S. 1990, ‘Offers and requests: performance by Japanese learners of English’, World Englishes 9(3): 317–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukushima, S. 1996, ‘Request strategies in British English and Japanese’, Language Sciences 18(3/4): 671–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukushima, S. 2000, Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese, Bern: Peter Lang

Galliker, M. and Klein, M. 1993, ‘Knigges “Umgangsbuch”. Zur Entwicklung der bürgerlichen Kommunikationsregeln’, in Sonntag, M. and Jüttemann, G. (eds.), Individuum und Geschichte. Beiträge zur Diskussion um eine ‘Historische Psychologie’, Heidelberg: Asanger, pp. 74–88

García, C. 1989, ‘Apologizing in English: politeness strategies used by native and non-native speakers’, Multilingua 8(1): 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García, C. 1993, ‘Making a request and responding to it: a case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers’, Journal of Pragmatics 19: 127–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García, C. 1996, ‘Teaching speech act performance: declining an invitation’, Hispania 79(2): 267–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García, C. 1999, ‘The three stages of Venezuelan invitations and responses’, Multilingua 18(4): 391–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garton, A.-F. and Pratt, C. 1990, ‘Children's pragmatic judgements of direct and indirect requests’, First Language 10(28, Pt 1): 51–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garvey, C. 1975, ‘Requests and responses in children's speech’, Child Language 2: 41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gass, S. and Neu, J. (eds.) 1995, Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, New York: Walter de Gruyter

Geis, M. 1995, Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction, New York: Cambridge University Press

Gleason, J. 1980, ‘The acquisition of social speech routines and politeness formulas’, in Giles, H., Robinson, W. and Smith, P. (eds.), Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 21–7

Gleason, J., Berko, J., Perlmann, R. and Greif, E. 1984, ‘What's the magic word: learning language through politeness routines’, Discourse Processes 7(4): 493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleason, J. and Weintraub, S. 1976, ‘The acquisition of routines in child language’, Language in Society 5: 129–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glick, D. 1996, ‘A reappraisal of Brown and Levinson's Politeness: Some Universals of Language Use, eighteen years later: review article’, Semiotica 109(1/2): 141–171Google Scholar

Gluckmann, M. 1962, Essays on the Ritual of Social Relations, Manchester: Manchester University Press

Goffman, E. 1955, ‘On face work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction’, Psychiatry 18: 213–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goffman, E. 1956, ‘The nature of deference and demeanor’, American Anthropologist 58: 473–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books

Goffman, E. 1971, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin

Goffman, E. 1981, Forms of Talk, Oxford: Blackwell

Goodwin, C. and Heritage, J. 1990, ‘Conversation analysis’, Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goody, E. (ed.) 1978, Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Greif, E. and Gleason, J. 1980, ‘Hi, thanks and goodbye: more routine information’, Language in Society 9: 159–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. 1957, ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. 1969, ‘Utterer's meaning and intentions’, Philosophical Review 78(2): 147–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. 1975, ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41– 58

Grice, H. 1978, ‘Further notes on logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 9. Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 113–27

Grosperrin, J.-P. 1997, ‘La politesse des premiers ages: un aspect du primitivisme chrétien sous Louis XIV’, in Wild, F. (ed.), Regards sur le passé dans l'Europe des XVIe et XVIIe siècles, Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 397–406

Gu, Y. 1990, ‘Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guazzo, Stefano (1574) La ciuil conuersatione, Brescia: Appresso Tomaso Bozzola

Halliday, M. 1973, Explorations in the Functions of Language, London: Edward Arnold

Halliday, M. 1978, Language as a Social Semiotic: the Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold

Harman, G. 1971, ‘Three levels of meaning’, in Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–75

Haverkate, H. 1979, Impositive Sentences in Spanish: Theory and Description in Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins

Haverkate, H. 1984, Speech Acts, Speakers and Hearers: Reference and Referential Strategies in Spanish, Amsterdam: Benjamins

Haverkate, H. 1987, ‘La cortesía como estrategía conversacional’, Diálogos Hispanicos de Amsterdam 6: 27–63Google Scholar

Haverkate, H. 1988a, ‘Politeness strategies in verbal interaction: an analysis of directness and indirectness in speech acts’, Semiotica 71: 59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haverkate, H. 1988b, ‘Toward a typology of politeness strategy in communicative interaction’, Multilingua 7(4): 385–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haverkate, H. 1990, ‘Aspectos semioticos de la cortesía verbal’, Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 28: 27–40Google Scholar

Haverkate, H. 1991, ‘La cortesía verbal: accion, transaccion e interaccion’, Revista Argentina de Linguistica 7(2): 141–78Google Scholar

Haverkate, H. 1994a, ‘The dialogues of Don Quixote de la Mancha: a pragmalinguistic analysis within the framework of Gricean maxims, speech act theory, and politeness theory’, Poetics: Journal for Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts 22(3): 219–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haverkate, H. 1994b, ‘Review of Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: a Crosscultural Perspective by Maria Sifianou’, Language in Society 23(4): 584–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helbig, G. 1973, Geschichte der neueren Sprachwissenschaft: Unter dem besonderen Aspekt der Grammatik-Theorie, Munich: Hueber

Held, G. 1987, ‘Danken – semantische, pragmatische und soziokulturelle Aspekte eines höflichen Sprechakts (gezeigt am Beispiel des Französischen)’, Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 13–14: 203–27Google Scholar

Held, G. 1988, ‘Osservazioni su strategie verbali di cortesia al servicio del ricevente’, in Mauro, T., Gensini, S. and Piemontese, M. (eds.), Dalla parte del ricevente: percezione, comprensione, interpretazione, Rome: Bulzoni, pp. 293–303

Held, G. 1989a, ‘Beziehungsarbeit und Konversationsanalyse am Beispiel eines Bittgesprächs’, Folia Linguistica 23: 405–31Google Scholar

Held, G. 1989b, ‘On the role of maximization in verbal politeness’, Multilingua 7(4): 167–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, G. 1991a, ‘Möglichkeiten der Entschärfung sozialer Übertretungs-handlungen’, in Stati, S., Weigand, E. and Hundsnurscher, F. (eds.) Dialoganalyse III. Teil I. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 319–39

Held, G. 1991b, ‘Sprechen als Ethnomethode’, in Dausendschön-Gay, U., Gülich, E. and Krafft, U. (eds.), Linguistische Interaktionsanalyse: Beiträge zum 20. Romanistentag 1987, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 155–69

Held, G. 1992a, ‘Aspekte des Zusammenhangs zwischen Höflichkeit und Sprache in der vorpragmatischen Sprachwissenschaft’, Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 108(1/2): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, G. 1992b, ‘Politeness in linguistic research’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 131–53

Held, G. 1995, Verbale Höflichkeit: Studien zur linguistischen Theorienbildung und empirische Untersuchung zum Sprachverhalten französischer und italienischer Jugendlicher in Bitt- und Danksituationen, Tübingen: Gunter Narr

Held, G. 1996, ‘Two polite speech acts in contrastive view: aspects of the realization of requesting and thanking in French and Italian’, in Hellinger, M. and Ammon, U. (eds.), Contrastive Sociolinguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 363–84

Held, G. 1999, ‘Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: reflections on the verbalization of social power relations’, Pragmatics 9(1): 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, J. 1990, ‘To wrap or not to wrap: politeness and penetration in ethnographic enquiry’, Man 24: 620–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, J. 1992, ‘Honorifics as dialect: the expression and manipulation of boundaries’, Multilingua 11(4): 341–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, J. 1993, Wrapping Culture: Politeness, Presentation and Power in Japan and Other Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Herbert, R. 1990, ‘Sex-based differences in compliment behavior’, Language in Society 19(2): 201–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbert, R. 1991, ‘The sociology of compliment work: an ethnocontrastive study of Polish and English compliments’, Multilingua 10(4): 381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbert, R. and Straight, H. 1989, ‘Compliment-rejection versus compliment-avoidance: listener-based versus speaker-based pragmatic strategies’, Language and Communication 9: 35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. 1986, ‘Universals of linguistic politeness: quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English’, Journal of Pragmatics 10(3): 347–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho, D. 1976, ‘On the concept of face’, American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 867–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holly, W. 1979, Imagearbeit in Gesprächen. Zur linguistischen Beschreibung des Beziehungsaspekts, Tübingen: Niemeyer

Holmes, J. 1986, ‘Functions of you know in women's and men's speech’, Language in Society 15: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. 1989a, ‘Paying compliments: a sex preferential politeness strategy’, Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 445–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. 1989b, ‘Sex differences and apologies: one aspect of communicative competence’, Applied Linguistics 10(2): 194–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. 1990, ‘Apologies in New Zealand English’, Language in Society 19(2): 155–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. 1993, ‘New Zealand women are good to talk to: an analysis of politeness strategies in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 20(2): 91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. 1995, Women, Men and Politeness, London: Longman

Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. 1997, ‘Good listeners: gender differences in New Zealand conversation’, Women and Language 20(2): 7–14Google Scholar

Holtgraves, T. 1986, ‘Language structure in social interaction: perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(2): 305–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, T. 1991, ‘Interpreting questions and replies: effects of face-threat, question form and gender’, Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, T. 1992, ‘The linguistic realization of face management: implications for language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross-cultural communication’, Social Psychology Quarterly 55(2): 141–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, T. 1997a, ‘Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks’, Memory and Cognition 25(1): 106–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, T. 1997b, ‘“Yes, but …”: positive politeness in conversation arguments’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(2): 222–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, T. and Yang, J. 1990, ‘Politeness as universal: cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(4): 719–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. (1993), Grammaticalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

House, J. 1988, ‘“Oh excuse me please …”: apologizing in a foreign language’, in Kettemann, B., Bierbaumer, P., Fill, A. and Karpf, A. (eds.), Englisch als Zweitsprache, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 303–27

House, J. 1989, ‘Politeness in English and German: the functions of please and bitte’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 96–119

House, J. and Kasper, G. 1981, ‘Politeness markers in English and German’, in Coulmas, F. (eds.), Conversational Routine, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 157–85

Hu, H. 1944, ‘The Chinese concepts of “face”’, American Anthropologist 46(1): 45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hymes, D. 1986, ‘Discourse: scope without depth’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 57: 49–89Google Scholar

Ide, S. 1982, ‘Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women's language’, Lingua 57(2/4): 357–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, S. 1989, ‘Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 223–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, S. 1993, ‘Linguistic politeness, III: linguistic politeness and universality’, Multilingua 12(1)Google Scholar

Ide, S., Hori, M., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. 1986, ‘Sex difference and politeness in Japanese’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 58: 25–36Google Scholar

Ide, S., Hill, B., Cames, Y., Ogino, T. and Kawasaki, A. 1992, ‘The concept of politeness: an empirical study of American English and Japanese’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281–97

James, A. 1983, ‘“Well” in reporting clauses: meaning and form of a “lexical filler”, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 8(1): 33–40Google Scholar

Janney, R. and Arndt, H. 1992, ‘Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–41

Janney, R. and Arndt, H. 1993, ‘Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: a historical perspective’, Multilingua 12(1): 13–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jary, M. 1998, ‘Relevance theory and the communication of politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. 1973, ‘A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address in closing sequences’, Semiotica 9: 47–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. 1992, ‘Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts’, Applied Linguistics 13(1): 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. and Roen, D. 1992, ‘Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: gender variation’, Language in Society 21(1): 27–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnstone, B., Ferrara, K. and Bean, J. 1992, ‘Gender, politeness, and discourse management in same sex and cross-sex opinion-poll interviews’, Journal of Pragmatics 18(5): 405–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, A. 1988, ‘The relevance of politeness’, Multilingua 7(4): 375–84Google Scholar

Jucker, A. 1994, ‘Review of Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, edited by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich’, Multilingua 13(3): 329–34Google Scholar

Jucker, A. (ed.) 1997, The Social Dimension of Communication, special issue of Multilingua 16(2/3)

Kachru, Y. 1994, ‘Crosscultural speech act research and the classroom’, Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series 5: 39–51Google Scholar

Kakava, C. 1997, ‘Review article: Politeness and the particularities of requests (Review of Sifianou 1992)’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 181–98Google Scholar

Kamisli, S. and Dogançay, S. A. 1997, ‘Gender differences in conveying embarrassing information: examples from Turkish’, Women and Language 20(2): 25–33Google Scholar

Kasper, G. 1990, ‘Linguistic politeness: current research issues’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katriel, T. 1986, Talking Straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Keenan, E. C. 1976, ‘The universality of conversational postulates’, Language in Society 5: 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ketcham, M. 1985, Transparent Designs: Reading, Performance, and Form in the Spectator Papers, Athens, GE: University of Georgia Press

Khanittanan, W. 1988, ‘Some observations on expressing politeness in Thai’, Language Sciences 10(2): 353–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kienpointner, M. 1997, ‘Varieties of rudeness: types and functions of impolite utterances’, Functions of Language 4(2): 251–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kienpointner, M. 1999, ‘Ideologies of politeness’, Pragmatics special issue 9(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, L. 1984, ‘The third Earl of Shaftesbury and the progress of politeness’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 18: 186–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, L. 1986, ‘Berkeley, Shaftesbury, and the meaning of politeness’, Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture 16: 57–68Google Scholar

Klein, L. 1990, ‘Politeness in seventeenth century England and France’, Cahiers du Dix-septième: an Interdisciplinary Journal 4(1): 91–106Google Scholar

Klein, L. 1992, ‘Courtly politesse and civic politeness in France and England’, Halcyon: a Journal of the Humanities 14: 171–81Google Scholar

Klein, L. 1994, Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Knapp-Potthoff, A. 1992, ‘Secondhand politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 203–18

Koike, D. 1989, ‘Requests and the role of deixis in politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 13(2): 187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koike, D. 1992, ‘Brazilian Portuguese directives and a hierarchy of strategies for politeness’, in Koike, D. (ed.), Romance Linguistics: the Portuguese Context, Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey, pp. 121–40

Koike, D. A. 1994, ‘Negation in Spanish and English suggestions and requests: mitigating effects?’, Journal of Pragmatics 21: 513–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotthoff, H. 1993, ‘Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures’, Language in Society 22(2): 193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotthoff, H. 1996, ‘Impoliteness and conversational joking: on relational politics’, Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 30(3–4): 299–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Kummer, M. 1992, ‘Politeness in Thai’, in Watts, R., Ide, I. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 325–36

Kwarciak, B. J. 1991. Cognitive Aspects of the Child's Linguistic Politeness, Dissertation, Abstracts International, vol. 51 (11–13)

Kwarciak, B. J. 1993, ‘The acquisition of linguistic politeness and Brown and Levinson's theory’, Multilingua 12(1): 51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. 1975, Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

Lakoff, R. 1973a, ‘The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's’, Chicago Linguistics Society 8: 292–305Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. 1973b, ‘Questionable answers and answerable questions’, in Kachru, B. et al. (eds.), Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 453–67

Lakoff, R. 1975a, Language and Women's Place, New York: Harper

Lakoff, R. 1975b, ‘Language theory and the real world’, Language Learning 25(2): 309–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, R. 1977, ‘What you can do with words: politeness, pragmatics and performatives’, in Rogers, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics, pp. 79–105

Lakoff, R. 1979, ‘Stylistic strategies within a grammar of style’, in Orasanu, J., Slater, K. and Adler, L. (eds.), Language, Sex and Gender: Does la difference make a difference?, New York: The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 53–80

Lakoff, R. 1989, ‘The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 101–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langford, P. 1989, A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Lavandera, B. 1988, ‘The social pragmatics of politeness forms’, in Ammon, U., Dittmar, N. and Mattheier, K. (eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: an International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society/Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft, 2 volumes, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1196–205

Lee-Wong, S.-M. 1994a, ‘Imperatives in requests: direct or impolite: observations from Chinese’, Pragmatics 4(4): 491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee-Wong, S.-M. 1994b, ‘Qing/Please: a polite or requestive marker? observations from Chinese’, Multilingua 13(4): 343–60Google Scholar

Lee-Wong, S.-M. 1999, Politeness and Face in Chinese Culture, Frankfurt: Peter Lang

Leech, G. 1977, Language and Tact, L.A.U.T. Papers 46. University of Trier

Leech, G. 1980, Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins

Leech, G. 1983, Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman

Lerch, E. 1934, Modalität: Stimmführung und affektische Verkürzung, Leipzig: Reisland

Lim, T.-S. 1994, ‘Facework and interpersonal relationships’, in Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.), The Challenge of Facework. Albany NY: University of New York Press, pp. 209–29

Lim, T.-S. and Bowers, J. 1991, ‘Facework: solidarity, approbation, and tact’, Human Communication Research 17(3): 415–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, R. 1987, ‘Critical review of Leech's Politeness Principle’, Foreign Language Teaching and Research 2 (70): 42–6Google Scholar

Magendie, M. 1970 [1924], La politesse mondaine et les théories de l'honnêteté en France au XVII e siècle, de 1600 à 1660, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints

Magli, P. 1992, ‘Mediocrita e bon ton passionale’, in Montandon, A. (ed.), Etiquette et politesse. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 43–55

Manes, J. and Wolfson, N. 1980, ‘The compliment as a social strategy’, Papers in Linguistics 13: 391–410Google Scholar

Manes, J. and Wolfson, N. 1981, ‘The compliment formula’, in Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational Routine. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 115–33

Mao, L. 1992, ‘Invitational discourse and Chinese identity’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 3(1): 70–96Google Scholar

Mao, L. R. 1994, ‘Beyond politeness theory: “face” revisited and renewed’, Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1988, ‘Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese’, Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 403–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1989, ‘Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 207–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1993, ‘Linguistic politeness and cultural style: observations from Japanese’, in Clancy, P. (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, II. Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information, pp. 55– 67

McIntosh, C. 1998, The Evolution of English Prose, 1700–1800: Style, Politeness, and Print Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Mead, G. 1934, Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago: University of Chicago

Milroy, L. 1980, Language and Social Networks, Oxford: Blackwell

Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1991, Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation, 2nd edition, London: Routledge

Montandon, A. (ed.), 1992. Etiquette et politesse. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand

Mugglestone, L. 1995, ‘Talking Proper’: the Rise of Accent as Social Symbol, Oxford: Clarendon

Mühlhäusler, P. and Harré, R. 1990, Pronouns and People: the Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity, Oxford: Blackwell

Mursy, A. and Wilson, J. 2001, ‘Towards a definition of Egyptian complimenting’, Multilingua 20(2): 133–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakanishi, M. 1998, ‘Gender enactment on a first date: a Japanese sample’, Women and Language 21(1): 10–17Google Scholar

Ng, S. H. and Bradac, J. J. 1993, Power in Language, Newbury Park: Sage

Norton, H. 1900, A Courtesy Book for Older Girls and Boys, London

Nwoye, O. 1989, ‘Linguistic politeness in Igbo’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 249–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nwoye, O. 1992, ‘Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face’, Journal of Pragmatics 18(4): 309–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Driscoll, J. 1996, ‘About face: a defence and elaboration of universal dualism’, Journal of Pragmatics 25(1): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olshtain, E. 1983, ‘Apologies across languages’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex, pp. 155–74

Olshtain, E. and Cohen, A. 1983, ‘Apology: a speech act set’, in Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House: 18–36

Olshtain, E. and Weinbach, L. 1987, ‘Complaints: a study of speech act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew’, in Verschueren, J. and Bertucelli-Papi, M. (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 195–208

Owen, M. 1983, Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: a Study of Language Use in Social Interaction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Patrizi, G. 1992, ‘Il valore della norma. Etichetta come comunicazione e rappresentazione tra Cortegiano e Galateo’, in Montandon, A. (ed.), Etiquette et politesse. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 33–42

Penman, R. 1990, ‘Facework and politeness: multiple goals in courtroom discourse’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(1/2): 15–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penman, R. 1994, ‘Facework in communication: conceptual and moral challenges’, in Ting-Toomey, S. (eds.), The Challenge of Facework, Albany NY: University of New York Press, pp. 15–45

Pocock, J. 1985, Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Potkay, Adam 1994, The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume, Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Power, T. G. and Shanks, J. A. 1989, ‘Parents as socializers: maternal and paternal views’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 18(2): 203–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman

Rathmayr, R. 1996a, Pragmatik der Entschuldigungen. Vergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel der russischen Sprache und Kultur, Cologne: Böhlau Verlag

Rathmayr, R. 1996b, ‘Sprachliche Höflichkeit. Am Beispiel expliziter und impliziter Höflichkeit im Russischen’, in Girke, W. (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik 1995, Munich: Böhlan Verlag, pp. 362–91

Rathmayr, R. 1999, ‘Métadiscours et réalité linguistique: l'exemple de la politesse russe’, Pragmatics 9(1): 75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reddy, M. 1979. ‘The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language’, in Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 284–324

Ross, J. 1970, ‘On declarative sentences’, in Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, R. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Waltham, Mass.: Ginn, pp. 222–72

Rundquist, S. 1992, ‘Indirectness: a gender study of flouting Grice's maxims’, Journal of Pragmatics 18: 431–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H. 1992, Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II, edited by Gail Jefferson, Oxford: Blackwell

Santosuosso, A. 1979, The Bibliography of Giovanni Della Casa: Books, Readers and Critics, 1537–1975, Florence: L. S. Olschki

Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S. 1991, ‘Non-cooperation in communication: a reassessment of Gricean pragmatics’, Journal of Pragmatics 17: 117–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sbisà, M. 1992, ‘Review of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies edited by S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper’, Journal of Pragmatics 17(3): 267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, D. 1987, Discourse Markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schmidt, R. 1980, ‘Review of Esther Goody, ed., Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction’, Regional English Language Centre Journal 11: 100–14Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1970, Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Searle, J. (ed.) 1972, The Philosophy of Language, London: Oxford University Press

Shaftesbury, 3rd Earl of, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1711, Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times: An Enquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit, London

Shibamoto, J. 1985, Japanese Women's Language, London: Academic Press

Shibamoto, J. 1994, ‘Review of Wrapping Culture: Politeness, Presentation, and Power in Japan and Other Societies by Joy Hendry’, Contemporary Sociology 23(4): 608Google Scholar

Shu, D. and Wang, H. 1993, ‘Complimenting and belittling acts in interpersonal rhetoric and politeness principle’, Waiguoyu, Beijing 3(85): 7–13Google Scholar

Sifianou, M. 1992a, Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece, Oxford: Clarendon

Sifianou, M. 1992b, ‘The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English’, Journal of Pragmatics 17: 155–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sifianou, M. 1993, ‘Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition’, Multilingua 12(1): 69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sifianou, M. 1995, ‘Do we need to be silent to be extremely polite? Silence and FTAs’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(1): 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sifianou, M. 1997a, ‘Politeness and off-record indirectness’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 163–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sifianou, M. 1997b, ‘Silence and politeness’, in Jaworski, A. (eds.), Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63–84

Sifianou, M. 1989, ‘On the telephone again. Differences in telephone behaviour: England versus Greece’, Language in Society 18(4): 527–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmel, G. 1900, Die Philosophie des Geldes, Leipzig: Dunker & Humbolt

Smith, J. 1997, ‘Review of Joy Hendry, Wrapping Culture’, Language in Society 26(2): 312–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, O. 1984, The Politics of Language 1791–1819, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Snow, C., Perlmann, R., Gleason, J. and Hooshyar, N. 1990, ‘Developmental perspectives on politeness: sources of children's knowledge’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson D. 1995, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell

Spitzer, L. 1922, Italienische Umgangssprache, Bonn: Schröder

Stalpers, J. 1992, ‘Between matter-of-factness and politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 219–30

Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.) 1970, Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–5

Steppat, M. 1994, ‘Social change and gender decorum: Renaissance courtesy’, in Carré, J. (ed.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900. Leiden: Brill, pp. 27–40

Strecker, I. 1993, ‘Cultural variations in the concept of “face”’, Multilingua 12(2): 119–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svartvik, J. 1980, ‘Well in conversation’, in Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (eds.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, London: Longman, 167–77

Thompson, S. and Mulac, A. 1991, ‘The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English’, Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ting-Toomey, S. 1994a, ‘Face and facework: Theoretical and research issues’, in Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.), The Challenge of Facework: Cross-Cultural and Interpersonal Issues. Albany NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 307–40

Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.) 1994b, The Challenge of Facework, Albany NY: University of New York Press

Tirkkonen-Condit, S. 1996, ‘Explicitness vs. implicitness of argumentation: An intercultural comparison’, Multilingua 15(3): 257–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomoda, S. 1991, ‘Cost and Benefit in Language Use: a Case Study of Sentence Particles in Japanese’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona

Trosborg, Anna 1987 ‘Apology strategies in natives/nonnatives’, Journal of Pragmatics 11: 147–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valtl, K. 1986, Erziehung zur Höflichkeit: Höflichkeit als Wertkonzept der Alltagsinteraktion, als Gegenstand empirischer Forschung in den Humanwissenschaften und als Aufgabe der Erziehung, Regensburg

Wartenberg, T. 1991. The Forms of Power: From Domination to Transformation, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press

Walper, S. and Valtin, R. 1992, ‘Children's understanding of white lies’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231– 51

Watts, R. 1987, ‘Relevance in conversational moves: a reappraisal of well’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 19: 37–59Google Scholar

Watts, R. 1989a, ‘The perceptual salience of discourse markers in conversation’, in Weydt, H. (ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 601–20

Watts, R. 1989b, ‘Taking the pitcher to the well: native speakers’ perceptions of their use of discourse markers in conversation', Journal of Pragmatics 13, 203–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, R. 1989c, ‘Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 131–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, R. 1991, Power in Family Discourse, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Watts, R. 1992, ‘Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43–69

Watts, R. 1994, ‘Planning in-service training courses: institutional constraints and non-native EFL teachers’ perceptions', International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4: 19–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, R. 1997a, ‘Silence and the acquisition of status in verbal interaction’, in Jaworski, A. (ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 87–115

Watts, R. 1997b, ‘Relevance theory and verbal interruptions: assessing discourse status’, in Jucker, A. H. (ed.), The Social Dimension of Communication, special issue of Multilingua 16(2/3): 153–86

Watts, R. 1999a, ‘Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain’, Pragmatics 9(1): 5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, R. 1999b, ‘The social construction of Standard English: grammar writers as a “discourse community”’, in Bex, A. and Watts, R. (eds.), Standard English: the Widening Debate, London: Routledge, pp. 40–68

Watts, R. 2002, ‘From polite language to educated language: the re-emergence of an ideology’, in Watts, R. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Alternative Histories of English, London: Routledge, 155–72

Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. 1992a, Introduction, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–17

Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.) 1992b, Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Watts, R. and Trudgill, P. (eds.) 2002, Alternative Histories of English, London: Routledge

Weinrich, H. 1986, Lügt man im Deutschen, wenn man höflich ist? Mannheim: Dudenverlag

Werkhofer, K. 1992, ‘Traditional and modern views: the social constitution and the power of politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 155–99

Wierzbicka, A. 1985, ‘Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs English’, Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. 1991a, Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: the Semantics of Human Interaction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Wierzbicka, A. 1991b, ‘Japanese key words and core cultural values’, Language in Society 20: 333–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wildeblood, J. 1965, The Polite World: a Guide to English Manners and Deportment from the Thirteenth to the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wilhite, M. 1983, ‘Children's acquisition of language routines: the end-of-the-meal routine in Cakchiquel’, Language in Society 12(1): 47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1978, ‘On Grice's theory of conversation’, Pragmatics Microfiche 3: 5Google Scholar

Woodhouse, J. 1994, ‘The tradition of Della Casa's Galateo in English’, in Carré, J. (eds.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900, Leiden: Brill, pp. 11–23

Yang, Y.-L. 1988, ‘The English pronoun of address: a matter of self-compensation’, Sociolinguistics 17(2): 157–80Google Scholar

Yli-Jokipii, H. 1994, Requests in Professional Discourse: a Cross-Cultural Study of British, American and Finnish Business Writing, Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia

Ziff, P. 1971, ‘On H. P. Grice's account of meaning’, in Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–5