Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:26:53.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - The functional diversity of mammals in coniferous forests of western North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Bruce G. Marcot
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, 602 SW Main Street, Suite 400, Portland, Oregon 97205, USA
Keith B. Aubry
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, Washington 98512, USA
Cynthia J. Zabel
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Research Station
Robert G. Anthony
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

The ecological knowledge needed to achieve the goals of ecosystem management will not be limited to understanding the influence of habitat manipulations on desired mammal populations; it will also include an understanding of how those mammals contribute to the functioning of the ecosystems they occupy. Examples of the significant influence that mammals may have on the structure and function of ecosystems include the effects of sea otters (Enhydra lutris) on the community structure of coastal marine ecosystems (Estes and Palmisano 1974), the effects of American beavers (Castor canadensis) on the hydrology and ecology of temperate riparian ecosystems (Naiman et al. 1986, Anthony et al. 2003), the effects of burrowing mammals on soil fertility and stability (Meadows and Meadows 1991, Ayarbe and Kieft 2000), and the effects of large ungulates on successional processes and the structure of plant communities in a variety of ecosystems (Hobbs 1996). Each of these species or species groups has been described as a potential keystone species (Mills et al. 1993) in the ecosystems they occupy. Because most species of mammals may not influence ecosystem processes to the extent that keystone species do, their ecological contributions are often overlooked. We propose, however, that the collective importance of terrestrial mammals to ecosystem structure and function is substantial and that the decline or loss of forest mammal species could have detrimental effects on ecosystem diversity, productivity, or sustainability.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mammal Community Dynamics
Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America
, pp. 631 - 664
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, R. G., M. A. O'Connell, M. M. Pollock, and J. G. Hallett. 2003. Associations of mammals with riparian ecosystems in Pacific Northwest forests. Pages 510–563 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Aubry, K. B., J. P. Hayes, B. L. Biswell, and B. G. Marcot. 2003. The ecological role of tree-dwelling mammals in western coniferous forests. Pages 405–443 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Ayarbe, J. P. and , T. L. Kieft. 2000. Mammal mounds stimulate microbial activity in a semiarid shrubland. Ecology 81(4):1150–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brang, P. 2001. Resistance and elasticity: promising concepts for the management of protection forests in the European Alps. Forest Ecology and Management 145:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 269 pp
Butler, D. R. 1995. Zoogeomorphology: Animals as Geomorphic Agents. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA
Carpenter, S. R. and K. L. Cottingham. 1997. Resilience and restoration of lakes. Conservation Ecology1:2. [Online at http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art2.]
Chappell, C. B., R. C. Crawford, C. Barrett, J. Kagan, D. H. Johnson, M. O'Mealy, G. A. Green, H. L. Ferguson, W. D. Edge, E. L. Greda, and T. A. O'Neil. 2001. Wildlife habitats: descriptions, status, trends, and system dynamics. Pages 22–114 in D. H. Johnson and T. A. O'Neil, managing directors. Wildlife–habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Dale, V. H., , S. Brown, , R. A. Haeuber, , N. T. Hobbs, , N. Huntly, , R. J. Naiman, , W. E. Riebsame, , M. G. Turner, and , T. J. Valone. 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10:639–670Google Scholar
Estes, J. A. and , J. F. Palmisano. 1974. Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science 185:1058–1060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca, C. R. and , G. Ganade. 2001. Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 89:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. F., , D. Lindenmayer, , J. A. MacMahon, , A. McKee, , J. Magnuson, , D. A. Perry, , R. Waide, and , D. Foster. 2000. Threads of continuity. Conservation Biology in Practice 1:9–16Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H. 2000. Ecological resilience in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, C. B. 1988. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities. Ecology 69:1703–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, P. F., editor. 1995. Earthworm Ecology and Biogeography in North America. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
Henke, S. E. and , F. C. Bryant. 1999. Effects of coyote removal on the faunal community in western Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:1066–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, N. T. 1996. Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:695–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. and T. O'Neil, managing directors. 2001. Wildlife–habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Jones, C. G., J. H. Lawton, and M. Shachak. 1996. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Pages 130–147 in F. B. Samson and F. L. Knopf, editors. Ecosystem Management: Selected Readings. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA
Kunkel, K. and , D. H. Pletscher. 1999. Species-specific population dynamics of cervids in a multipredator ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:1082–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. Y., , C. Maser, , Z. Maser, and , B. A. Caldwell. 1986. Role of three rodents in forest nitrogen fixation in western Oregon: another aspect of mammal-mycorrhizal fungus-tree mutualism. Great Basin Naturalist 46:411–414Google Scholar
Loeb, S. C., , F. H. Tainter, and , E. Cazares. 2000. Habitat associations of hypogeous fungi in the southern Appalachians: implications for the endangered northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus). American Midland Naturalist 144(2): 286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, D., B. Walker, and C. S. Holling. 1997. Sustainability, stability, and resilience. Conservation Ecology1:7. [Online at: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art7.]
Luoma, D. L., J. M. Trappe, A. W. Claridge, K. M. Jacobs, and E. Cazares. 2003. Relationships among fungi and small mammals in forested ecosystems. Pages 343–373 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Marcot, B. G. 1997. Research information needs on terrestrial vertebrate species of the interior Columbia River Basin and northern portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Research Note PNW-RN-522. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA. Abstract and database available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/marcot.html
Marcot, B. G. 2002. An ecological functional basis for managing decaying wood for wildlife. Pages 895–910 in W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., P. J. Shea, B. E. Valentine, C. P. Weatherspoon, and T. E. Lisle, technical coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology and management of dead wood in western forests, November 2–4, 1999; Reno, Nevada. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, California, USA
Marcot, B. G. and M. Vander Heyden. 2001. Key ecological functions of wildlife species. Pages 168–186 in Wildlife–habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Marcot, B. G., M. A. Castellano, J. A. Christy, L. K. Croft, J. F. Lehmkuhl, R. H. Naney, K. Nelson, C. G. Niwa, R. E. Rosentreter, R. E. Sandquist, B. C. Wales, and E. Zieroth. 1997. Terrestrial ecology assessment. Pages 1497–1713 in T. M. Quigley and S. J. Arbelbide, editors. An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Volume III. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA
Marcot, B. G., W. E. McConnaha, P. H. Whitney, T. A. O'Neil, P. J. Paquet, L. Mobrand, G. R. Blair, L. C. Lestelle, and K. M. Malone. 2002. A Multi-species Framework Approach for the Columbia River Basin: Integrating Fish, Wildlife, and Ecological Functions. On CD-ROM and at http://www.edthome.org/framework. Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon, USA
Maser, C. and , Z. Maser. 1988. Interactions among squirrels, mycorrhizal fungi, and coniferous forests in Oregon. Great Basin Naturalist 48:358–369Google Scholar
McComb, W. C. 2003. Ecology of coarse woody debris and its role as habitat for mammals. Pages 374–404 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
McShea, W. J. and , J. H. Rappole. 2000. Managing the abundance and diversity of breeding bird populations through manipulation of deer populations. Conservation Biology 14:1161–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S. and A. Meadows, editors. 1991. The Environmental Impact of Burrowing Animals and Animal Burrows. [Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 63.] Oxford University Press, UK
Mills, L. S., , M. E. Soulé, and , D. F. Doak. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience 43:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. L., B. G. Marcot, and R. W. Mannan. 1998. Wildlife–habitat Relationships: Concepts and Applications. Second Edition. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Nabhan, G. P. 2001. Nectar trails of migratory pollinators: restoring corridors on private lands. Conservation Biology in Practice 2(1):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, R. J., , J. M. Melillo, and , J. E. Hobbie. 1986. Ecosystem alteration of boreal forest streams by beaver (Castor canadensis). Ecology 67:1254–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noronha, V. T. and , M. F. Goodchild. 1992. Modeling interregional interaction: implications for defining functional regions. Annals of the American Geographers 82:86–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, T. A., K. A. Bettinger, M. Vander Heyden, B. G. Marcot, C. Barrett, T. K. Mellen, W. M. Vander Haegen, D. H. Johnson, P. J. Doran, L. Wunder, and K. M. Boula. 2001. Structural conditions and habitat elements of Oregon and Washington. Pages 115–139 in D. H. Johnson and T. A. O'Neil, managing directors. Wildlife–habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Peterson, G., , C. R. Allen, and , C. S. Holling. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reice, S. R., , R. C. Wissmar, and , R. J. Naiman. 1990. Disturbance regimes, resilience, and recovery of animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems. Environmental Management 14:647–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, C. L., B. G. Marcot, T. K. Mellen, J. L. Ohmann, K. L. Waddell, D. L. Lindley, and B. Schreiber. 2001. Decaying wood in Pacific Northwest forests: concepts and tools for habitat management. Pages 580–623 in D. H. Johnson and T. A. O'Neil, managing directors. Wildlife–habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passe in the landscape era?Biological Conservation 83:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirotnak, J. M. and , N. J. Huntly. 2000. Direct and indirect effects of herbivores on nitrogen dynamics: voles in riparian areas. Ecology 81:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallwood, K. S., , M. L. Morrison, and , J. Beyea. 1998. Animal burrowing attributes affecting hazardous waste management. Environmental Management 22(6):831–847CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strange, E. M., , K. D. Fausch, and , A. P. Covich. 1999. Sustaining ecosystem services in human-dominated watersheds: biohydrology and ecosystem processes in the South Platte River Basin. Environmental Management 24:39–54Google ScholarPubMed
Hees, W. W. S. and , E. H. Holsten. 1994. An evaluation of selected spruce bark beetle infestation dynamics using point in time extensive forest inventory data, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. 1995. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology 9:747–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, J. L., , P. C. Paquet, and , L. F. Ruggiero. 1996. Resilience and conservation of large carnivores in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology 10:964–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. W. and , A. W. Liebhold. 2000. Spatial synchrony of spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern North America. Ecology 81:2753–2766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, F. I. 1994. How many species are required for a functional ecosystem? Pages 271–291 in E. D. Schulze and H. A. Mooney, editors. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×