Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T23:21:26.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - New Family Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Susan Golombok
Edited by
Alison Clarke-Stewart  and
Judy Dunn
Susan Golombok
Affiliation:
City University, London, U.K.
Alison Clarke-Stewart
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Judy Dunn
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

In July 2004, Louise Brown, the first “test-tube” baby celebrated her 25th birthday. In the years since her birth, in vitro fertilization (IVF) has made the transition from the realm of science fiction to a commonly accepted treatment for infertility. The 1970s was also a time when another new and controversial family type, lesbian-mother families, came to the fore, and when families headed by single heterosexual mothers began to cast off the stigma associated with illegitimacy and divorce. Today, there exists a variety of new family forms made possible through advances in assisted reproduction technology. An example is the small but growing number of lesbian and single heterosexual women who are actively choosing assisted reproduction, particularly donor insemination, as a means of conceiving a child without the involvement of a male partner. In this chapter, I examine research on the psychological outcomes for parents and children in assisted reproduction families, with particular attention to the concerns and policy issues that have been raised by creating families in this way. The chapter is structured according to four major types of assisted reproduction: (1) Those involving “high-tech” procedures such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), (2) those involving gamete donation such as donor insemination (DI) and egg donation, (3) those resulting in nontraditional families such as single mother- and lesbian- mother families, and (4) those involving surrogate mothers. Although the four categories are not mutually exclusive, each raises a specific set of concerns regarding family functioning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Families Count
Effects on Child and Adolescent Development
 , pp. 273 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, P. R. (1993). Children's adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amuzu, B., Laxova, R., & Shapiro, S. (1990). Pregnancy outcome, health of children and family adjustment of children after DI. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 75, 899–905.Google Scholar
Back, K., & Snowden, R. (1988). The anonymity of the gamete donor. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 9, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baran, A., & Pannor, R. (1993). Lethal Secrets. New York: Amistad.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Sutcliffe, A., Kristoffersen, I., Loft, A., Wennerholm, U., Tarlatzis, V.. (2004). The influence of assisted reproduction on family functioning and children's socio-emotional development: Results from a European study. Human Reproduction, 19, 1480–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, J., Freeland, C., & Lounsbury, M. (1979). Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Development, 50, 794–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergh, T., Ericson, A., Hillensjo, T., Bygren, K. G., & Wennerholm, U. B. (1999). Deliveries and children born after in vitro fertilization in Sweden 1982–5: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 354, 1579–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, E. (1995). “Not a primrose path”: Commissioning parents' experiences of surrogacy arrangements in Britain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 185–196.Google Scholar
Bok, S. (1982). Secrets. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bonduelle, M., Joris, H., Hofmans, K., Liebaers, I., & Steirteghem, A. (1998). Mental development of 201 ICSI children at 2 years of age. Lancet, 351, 1553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonduelle, M., Ponjaert, I., Steirteghem, A. V., Derde, M. P., Devroey, P., & Liebaers, I. (2003). Developmental outcome at 2 years of age for children born after ICSI compared with children born after IVF. Human Reproduction, 18, 342–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botting, B. J., MacFarlane, A. J., & Price, F. V. (1990). Three, four and more. A study of triplet and higher order births. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Bowen, J. R., Gibson, F. L., Leslie, G. I., & Saunders, D. M. (1998). Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet, 351, 1529–1534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandes, J. M., Scher, A., Itzkovits, J., Thaler, I., Sarid, M., & Gershoni-Baruch, R. (1992). Growth and development of children conceived by in vitro fertilization. Pediatrics, 90, 424–429.Google ScholarPubMed
Brewaeys, A. (2001). Review: Parent-child relationships and child development in donor insemination families. Human Reproduction Update, 17, 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewaeys, A. (1996). DI, the impact on family and child development. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 17, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I., Hall, E. V., & Golombok, S. (1997). DI: Child development and family functioning in lesbian-mother families. Human Reproduction 12, 1349–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I., Hall, E. V., Helmerhorst, F. M., & Devroey, P. (1995). Lesbian mothers who conceived after DI: A follow-up study. Human Reproduction, 10, 2731–2735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodzinsky, D. M., Smith, D. W., & Brodzinsky, A. B. (1998). Children's adjustment to adoption. Developmental and clinical issues. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Burns, L. H. (1990). An exploratory study of perceptions of parenting after infertility. Family Systems Medicine, 8, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederblad, M., Friberg, B., Ploman, F., Sjoberg, N. O., Stjernqvist, K., & Zackrisson, E. (1996). Intelligence and behavior in children born after in-vitro fertilization treatment. Human Reproduction, 11, 2052–2057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, R. W., Raboy, B., & Patterson, C. J. (1998). Psychosocial adjustment among children conceived via DI by lesbian and heterosexual mothers. Child Development, 69, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase-Lansdale, P. L., & Hetherington, E. M. (1990). The impact of divorce on life-span development: Short and long-term effects. In Baltes, P. B., Featherman, D. L. and Lerner, R. M. (Eds.). Life-span development and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clamar, A. (1989). Psychological implications of the anonymous pregnancy. In Offerman-Zuckerberg, J. (Ed.), Gender in transition: A new frontier. New York and London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, C., & Kovacs, G. (1982). AID offspring: initial follow up study of 50 couples. Medical Journal of Australia, 1, 338–339.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J., McMahon, F., Gibson, F., Leslie, G., & Saunders, D. (2001). Marital adjustment in ICSI families: A controlled comparison. Paper presented at the 17th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Melbourne, Australia.
Colpin, H., Demyttenaere, K., & Vandemeulebroecke, L. (1995). New reproductive technology and the family: The parent-child relationship following in vitro fertilization. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 1429–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, R., Golombok, S., Bish, A., & Murray, C. (1995). Keeping secrets: A study of parental attitudes toward telling about donor insemination. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordray, B. (1999). Speaking for ourselves: Quotes from men and women created by DI/remote father conception. 11th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive Genetics, Sydney, Australia.
Daniels, K., & Lewis, G. M. (1996). Openness of information in the use of donor gametes: Developments in New Zealand. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 14, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, K., & Taylor, K. (1993). Secrecy and openness in DI. Politics and Life Sciences. 12, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donor Conception Support Group of Australia (1997). Let the offspring speak: Discussions on donor conception. New South Wales: Georges Hall.
Einwohner, J. (1989). Who becomes a surrogate: Personality characteristics. In Offerman-Zuckerberg, J. (Ed.), Gender in transition: A new frontier (123–149). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESHRE Task Force (2003). Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation. Brussels: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Fidell, L., & Marik, J. (1989). Paternity by proxy: Artificial insemination by donor sperm. In Offerman-Zuckerberg, J. (Ed.), Gender in Transition: A new frontier. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaks, D. K., Ficher, I., Masterpasqua, F., & Joseph, G. (1995). Lesbians choosing motherhood: A comparative study of lesbian and heterosexual parents and their children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, F. L., Ungerer, J. A., Leslie, G. I., Saunders, D. M., & Tennant, C. C. (1998). Development, behavior and temperament: A prospective study of infants conceived through in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 13, 1727–1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, F. L., Ungerer, J. A., Leslie, G. I., Saunders, D. M., & Tennant, C. C. (1999). Maternal attitudes to parenting and mother-child relationship and interaction in IVF families: A prospective study. Human Reproduction, 14, 131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, F., Ungerer, J., McMahon, C., Leslie, G., & Saunders, D. (2000). The mother-child relationship following in vitro fertilization (IVF): Infant attachment, responsivity, and maternal sensitivity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 1015–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, F. L., Ungerer, J. A., Tennant, C. C., & Saunders, D. M. (2000). Parental adjustment and attitudes to parenting after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 73, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S. (1999). Lesbian mother families. In Bainham, A., Sclater, S. & Richards, M. (Eds.), What is a parent? A socio-legal analysis. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Golombok, S., Brewaeys, A., Cook, R., Giavazzi, M. T., Guerra, D., Mantovanni, A., Hall, E., Crosignano, P. G., & Dexeus, S. (1996). The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families. Human Reproduction, 11, 2324–2331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., Brewaeys, A., Giavazzi, M. T., Guerra, D., MacCallum, F., & Rust, J. (2002a). The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: The transition to adolescence. Human Reproduction, 17, 830–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golombok, S., Cook, R., Bish, A., & Murray, C. (1995). Families created by the New Reproductive Technologies: Quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children. Child Development, 66, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golombok, S., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F., Jadva, V., Murray, C., Rust, J., Abdalla, H., Jenkins, J., & Margara, R. (2004). Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., & Goodman, E. (2001). The ‘test-tube’ generation: parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of IVF children at adolescence. Child Development, 72, 599–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., Goodman, E., & Rutter, M. (2002b). Families with children conceived by DI: A follow-up at age 12. Child Development, 73, 952–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golombok, S., Murray, C., Brinsden, P., & Abdalla, H. (1999). Social versus biological parenting: Family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S., Tasker, F., & Murray, C. (1997). Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: Family relationships and the socioemotional development of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 783–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, R. (1994). A modified version of the Rutter parent questionnaire including extra items on children's strengths: A research note. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 35, 1483–1494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, C., Lalos, O., & Lindblad, F. (2000). Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: The impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes. Human Reproduction, 15, 2052–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotevant, M. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in adoption: Exploring family connections. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Hahn, C., & DiPietro, J. A. (2001). In vitro fertilization and the family: Quality of parenting, family functioning, and child psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, E. M., & Stanley-Hagan, M. M. (1995). Parenting in divorced and remarried families. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting: Vol. 3. (pp. 233–254). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Humphrey, M., & Humphrey, H. (1987). Marital relationships in couples seeking DI. Journal of Biosocial Science, 19, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izuka, R., Yoshiaki, S., Nobuhiro, N., & Michie, O. (1968). The physical and mental development of children born following artificial insemination. International Journal of Fertility, 13, 24–32.Google Scholar
Jacob, M., Klock, S., & Maier, D. (1999). Lesbian mothers as therapeutic donor insemination recipients: Do they differ from other patients?Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, T., Missmer, S., & Hornstein, M. (2004). Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 1639–1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karpel, M. A. (1980). Family secrets: I. Conceptual and ethical issues in the relational context. II. Ethical and practical considerations in therapeutic management.”Family Process, 19, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klock, S., Jacob, M., & Maier, D. (1994). A prospective study of DI recipients: Secrecy, privacy and disclosure. Fertility and Sterility, 62, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klock, S., & Maier, D. (1991). Psychological factors related to DI. Fertility and Sterility, 56, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, G. T., Mushin, D., Kane, H., & Baker, H. W. G. (1993). A controlled study of the psycho-social development of children conceived following insemination with donor semen. Human Reproduction, 8, 788–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeton, J., & Blackwell, J. (1982). A preliminary psychosocial follow-up of parents and their children conceived by artificial insemination by donor (AID). Clinical Reproduction and Fertility, 1, 307–310.Google Scholar
Leiblum, S., & Aviv, A. (1997). Disclosure issues and decisions of couples who conceived via donor insemination. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiblum, S., Palmer, M., & Spector, I. (1995). Non-traditional mothers: Single heterosexual/lesbian women and lesbian couples electing motherhood via donor insemination. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, G. I., Cohen, J., Gibson, F. L., McMahon, C., Maddison, V., Saunders, D., & Tennant, C. (2002, 1–3 July). ICSI children have normal development at school age. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Vienna.
Levy-Shiff, R., Vakil, E., Dimitrovsky, L., Abramovitz, M., Shahar, N., Har-Even, D., Gross, S., Lerman, M., Levy, I., Sirota, L., & Fish, B. (1998). Medical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes in school-age children conceived by in-vitro fertilization. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 320–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindblad, F., Gottlieb, C., & Lalos, O. (2000). To tell or not to tell – what parents think about telling their children that they were born following DI. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 21, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutjen, P., Trounson, A., Leeton, J., Findlay, J., Wood, C., & Renou, P. (1984). The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature, 307, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lytton, H., & Gallagher, L. (2002). Parenting twins and the genetics of parenting. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting, (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacCallum, F. (2004). Embryo donation families: Parenting and child development. Paper presented at 20th Annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Berlin.
MacCallum, F., Lycett, E., Murray, C., Jadva, V., & Golombok, S. (2003). Surrogacy: The experience of commissioning couples. Human Reproduction, 18, 1334–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manuel, C., Facy, F., Choquet, M., Grandjean, H., & Czyba, J. C. (1990). Les risques psychologiques de la conception par IAD pour l'enfant. [The psychological risks of conception by IAD for the child.]Neuropsychiatrie de l'enfance, 38, 642–58.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, C., Gibson, F., Leslie, G., Cohen, J., & Tennant, C. (2003). Parents of 5-year-old in vitro fertlization children: Psychological adjustment, parenting stress, and the influence of subsequent in vitro fertilization treatment. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, C., Ungerer, J., Beaurepaire, J., Tennant, C., & Saunders, D. (1995). Psychosocial outcomes for parents and children after in vitro fertilization: a review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, C. A., Ungerer, J. A., Tennant, C., & Saunders, D. (1997). Psychosocial adjustment and the quality of the mother-child relationship at four months postpartum after conception by in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, S., & Dodd, B. (1997). A comparison of the expressive communication skills of triplet, twin and singleton children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 328–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milson, I., & Bergman, P. (1982). A study of parental attitudes after DI. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 61, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, T. R., Aiello, F., Adelman, R. D., Wasylyshyn, N., Andrews, M. C., Brazelton, T. B., Jones, G. S., & Jones, H. W. (1999). The psychological status at school age of children conceived by in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 14, 2162–2165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, N. C., Wirth, F. H., Johnson, D. H., Frank, L. M., Presburg, H. J., Water, V. L.. (1989). Congenital malformations and psychosocial development in children conceived by in vitro fertilization. Journal of Pediatrics, 115, 222–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, C., & Golombok, S. (in press). Going it alone: Solo mothers and their infants conceived by donor insemination. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.Google Scholar
Murray, C., & Golombok, S. (2003). To tell or not to tell: The decision-making process of egg donation parents. Human Fertility, 6, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mushin, D., Spensley, J., & Barreda-Hanson, M. (1985). Children of IVF. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, 865–875.Google ScholarPubMed
Mushin, D. N., Barreda-Hanson, M. C., & Spensley, J. C. (1986). In vitro fertilization children: Early psychosocial development. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 3, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nachtigall, R., Becker, G., Szkupinski Quigora, S., & Tschann, J. (1998). The disclosure decision: Concerns and issues of parents and children conceived through donor insemination. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 176, 1165–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachtigall, R. D., Pitcher, L., Tschann, J. M., Becker, G., & Szkupinski Quiroga, S. (1997). Stigma, disclosure and family functioning among parents of children conceived through DI. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyboe Andersen, A., Gianaroli, L., & Nygren, K. (2004). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 19, 490–503.Google ScholarPubMed
Nygren, K. G., & Andersen, A. N. (2002). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1999: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 17, 3260–3274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivennes, F., Fanchin, R., Ledee, N., Righini, C., Kadoch, I. J., & Frydman, R. (2002). Perinatal outcome and developmental studies on children born after IVF. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivennes, F., Kerbrat, V., Rufat, P., Blanchet, V., Franchin, R., & Frydman, R. (1997). Follow-up of a cohort of 422 children aged 6–13 years conceived by in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 67, 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, D., Edelman, R., & Humphrey, M. (1993). Male infertility and DI: Couples decisions, reactions, and counselling needs. Human Reproduction, 8, 880–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaligoura, Z., Panopoulou-Maratou, O., Solman, M., Arvaniti, K., & Sarafidou, J. (2004). Cognitive development of 12-month-old Greek infants conceived after ICSI and the effects of the method on their parents. Human Reproduction, 19, 1488–1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papp, P. (1993). The worm in the bud: Secrets between parents and children. In Imber-Black, E. (Ed.), Secrets in families and family therapy (pp. 66–85). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. J. (1992). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Child Development, 63, 1025–1042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Place, I., & Englert, Y. (2002). The emotional and behavioral development of ICSI children. How are the ICSI families coping in comparison with IVF and run-of-the-mill families? Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, Vienna.
Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. (2003). Follow-up of ICSI Children: Cognitive and neurodevelopmental outcome. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Madrid, 29 June–2 July.
Raoul-Duval, A., Bertrand-Servais, M., & Frydman, R. (1993). Comparative prospective study of the psychological development of children born by in vitro fertilization and their mothers. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raoul-Duval, A., Bertrand-Servais, M., Letur-Konirsch, H., & Frydman, R. (1994). Psychological follow-up of children born after in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 9, 1097–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reading, A., Sledmere, C., & Cox, D. (1982). A survey of patient attitudes towards artificial insemination by donor. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 26, 429–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ron-El, R., Lahat, E., Golan, A., Lerman, M., Bukovsky, I., & Herman, A. (1994). Development of children born after ovarian superovulation induced by long-acting gonadatrophin-releasing hormone antagonists and menotrophins, and by in vitro fertilization. Journal of Pediatrics, 125, 734–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumball, A., & Adair, V. (1999). Telling the story: Parents' scripts for donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 14, 1392–1399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., Thorpe, K., Greenwood, R., Northstone, K., & Golding, J. (2003). Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay: Vol 1. Design; twin-singleton differences in language, and obstetric risks. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schover, L. R., Collins, R. L., & Richards, S. (1992). Psychological aspects of DI: evaluation and follow up of recipient couples. Fertility and Sterility, 57, 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheib, J., Riordan, M., & Rubin, S. (2003). Choosing identity-release sperm donors: The parents' perspective 13–18 years later. Human Reproduction, 18, 1115–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serafini, P. (2001). Outcome and follow-up of children born after in vitro fertilization surrogacy (IVF surrogacy). Human Reproduction Update, 17, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowden, R. (1990). The family and artificial reproduction. In Bromham, E. A. (Ed.), Philosophical Ethics in Reproductive Medicine. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, R., Mitchell, G. D., & Snowden, E. M. (1983). Artificial reproduction: A social investigation. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Sajaniemi, N., , A.iitinen, & Hovatta, O. (1998). Health and development of children born after oocyte donation compared with that of those born after in-vitro fertilization, and parents' attitudes regarding secrecy. Human Reproduction, 13, 2009–2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steptoe, P. C., & Edwards, R. G. (1978). Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet, 2, 366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, A. G., Taylor, B., Li, J., Thornton, S., Grudzinskas, J. G., & Lieberman, B. A. (1999). Children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A population control study. British Medical Journal, 318, 704–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, A. G., Taylor, B., Saunders, K., Thornton, S., Lieberman, B. A., & Grudzinskas, J. G. (2001). Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: UK case-control study. Lancet, 357, 2080–2084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velde, E. R., Baar, A. L., & Kooij, R. J. (1998). Concerns about assisted reproduction. Lancet, 351, 1524–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trounson, A., Leeton, J., Besanka, M., Wood, C., & Conti, A. (1983). Pregnancy established in an infertile patient after transfer of a donated embryo fertilized in vitro. British Medical Journal, 286, 835–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balen, F. (1996). Child-rearing following in vitro fertilization. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 687–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balen, F. (1998). Development of IVF children. Developmental Review, 18, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkel, D., Veen, L., Kimmel, I., & Velde, E. R. (1999). Differences in the attitudes of couples whose children were conceived through artificial insemination by donor in 1980 and in 1996. Fertility and Sterility, 71, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steirteghem, A., Bonduelle, M., Devroey, P., & Liebaers, I. (2002). Follow-up of children born after ICSI. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Vanfraussen, K., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I., Brewaeys, A. (2001). An attempt to reconstruct children's donor concept: A comparison between children's and lesbian parents' attitudes towards donor anonymity. Human Reproduction, 16, 2019–2025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vayena, E., Rowe, P. J., & Griffin, P. D. (Eds.) (2002). Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Report of a meeting on medical, ethical and social aspects of assisted reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. M., Clifford, E., Gordon, A. G., Hay, D. M., & Robinson, J. (1993). A follow-up study of ‘successful’ IVF/GIFT couples: Social-emotional well-being and adjustment to parenthood. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. 14, 5–16.Google Scholar
Weinraub, M., Horvath, D. L. & Gringlas, M. B. (2002). Single parenthood. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting: Vol. 3. (pp. 109–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wendland, C., Byrn, F., & Hill, C. (1996). Donor insemination: A comparison of lesbian couples, heterosexual couples and single women. Fertility and Sterility, 65, 764–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yovich, J., Parry, T., French, N., & Grauaug, A. (1986). Developmental assessment of 20 in vitro fertilization (I.V.F.) infants at their first birthday. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 3, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegers-Hochschild, F. (2002). The Latin American Registry of Assisted Reproduction. In Vayena, E., Rowe, P. J., & Griffin, P. D. (Eds.) Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: Report of a meeting on medical, ethical and social aspects of assisted reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×