Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:08:13.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - The Liouville equation and atmospheric predictability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Martin Ehrendorfer
Affiliation:
Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Universität Innsbruck
Tim Palmer
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Renate Hagedorn
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Get access

Summary

Introduction and motivation

It is widely recognised that weather forecasts made with dynamical models of the atmosphere are inherently uncertain. Such uncertainty of forecasts produced with numerical weather prediction (NWP) models arises primarily from two sources: from imperfect knowledge of the initial model conditions and from imperfections in the model formulation itself. The recognition of the potential importance of accurate initial model conditions and an accurate model formulation dates back to times even prior to operational NWP (Bjerknes, 1904; Thompson, 1957). In the context of NWP, the importance of these error sources in degrading the quality of forecasts was demonstrated to arise because errors introduced in atmospheric models are, in general, growing (Lorenz, 1982, 1963, 1993, this volume), which at the same time implies that the predictability of the atmosphere is subject to limitations (Errico et al., 2002). An example of the amplification of small errors in the initial conditions, or, equivalently, the divergence of initially nearby trajectories is given in Figure 4.1, for the system discussed by Lorenz (1984). The uncertainty introduced into forecasts through uncertain initial model conditions, and uncertainties in model formulations, has been the subject of numerous studies carried out in parallel with the continuous development of NWP models (e.g. Leith, 1974; Epstein, 1969; Palmer, 2000, this volume, Buizza, this volume).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, R. and Marsden, J. E. (1978). Foundations of Mechanics. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Arnold, V. I. (1989). Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balescu, R. (1991). Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Krieger Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Bjerknes, V. (1904). Das Problem der Wettervorhersage, betrachtet vom Standpunkte der Mechanik und der Physik. Meteorol. Z., 21, 1–7Google Scholar
Bourke, W. (1972). An efficient, one-level, primitive-equation spectral model. Mon. Weather Rev., 100, 683–92.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, P. C., Ivanov, L. M., Margolina, T. M. and Melnichenko, O. V. (2002). Probabilistic stability of an atmospheric model to various amplitude perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2860–732.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, S. R. and Mazur, P. (1984). Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. DoverGoogle Scholar
DeGroot, M. H. (1986). Probability and Statistics. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Dudewicz, E. J. and Mishra, S. N. (1988). Modern Mathematical Statistics. WileyGoogle Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. (1994a). The Liouville equation and its potential usefulness for the prediction of forecast skill. I: Theory. Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 703–132.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. (1994b). The Liouville equation and its potential usefulness for the prediction of forecast skill. II: Applications. Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 714–282.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. (1997). Predicting the uncertainty of numerical weather forecasts: a review. Meteorol. Z., N. F., 6, 147–83Google Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. (1999). Prediction of the uncertainty of numerical weather forecasts: problems and approaches. In Proceedings ECMWF Workshop on Predictability, 20–22 October 1997, pp. 27–99. ECMWFGoogle Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. (2003). The Liouville equation in atmospheric predictability. In Proceedings ECMWF Seminar on Predictability of Weather and Climate, 9–13 September 2002, pp. 47–81. ECMWFGoogle Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. and Tribbia, J. J. (1997). Optimal prediction of forecast error covariances through singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 286–3132.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, E. S. (1969). Stochastic dynamic prediction. Tellus, 21, 739–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errico, R. M., Ehrendorfer, M. and Raeder, K. (2001). The spectra of singular values in a regional model. Tellus, 53A, 317–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errico, R. M., Langland, R. and Baumhefner, D. P. (2002). The workshop in atmospheric predictability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1341–3Google Scholar
Fortak, H. (1973). Prinzipielle Grenzen der deterministischen Vorhersagbarkeit atmosphärischer Prozesse. Ann. Meteorol., N.F., 6, 111–20Google Scholar
Gardiner, C. W. (1990). Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences. SpringerGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, T. A. (1966). A causal relation for probabilities in synoptic meteorology. J. Appl. Meteorol., 5, 365–82.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1980). Classical Mechanics. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Hamill, T. M., Mullen, S. L., Snyder, C., Toth, Z. and Baumhefner, D. P. (2000). Ensemble forecasting in the short to medium range: report from a workshop. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 2653–642.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill, T. M., Snyder, C. and Whitaker, J. S. (2003). Ensemble forecasts and the properties of flow-dependent analysis-error covariance singular vectors. Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1741–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselmann, K. (1976). Stochastic climate models. I: Theory. Tellus, 28, 473–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, G. (1986). Eddies, waves, circulation, and mixing: statistical geofluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 18, 91–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y. and Pierrehumbert, R. T. (2001). The advection-diffusion problem for stratospheric flow. I: Concentration probability distribution function. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1493–5102.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D. and Lifschitz, E. M. (1979). Lehrbuch der Theoretischen Physik. Band V Statistische Physik, Teil 1. Berlin: Akademie-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Leith, C. E. (1974). Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev., 102, 409–182.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. M. (2005). Roots of ensemble forecasting. Mon. Weather Rev., 133(7), 1865–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. C. and Segel, L. A. (1988). Mathematics Applied to Deterministic Problems in the Natural Sciences. Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, K. and West, B. J. (1990). The Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics of Open and Closed Systems. VCH PublishersGoogle Scholar
Liouville, J. (1838). Sur la théorie de la variation des constantes arbitraires. J. Math. Pures Appl., 3, 342–9Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–412.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1969a). The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 21, 289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1969b). Three approaches to atmospheric predictability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 50, 345–9Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1982). Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus, 34, 505–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1984). Irregularity: a fundamental property of the atmosphere. Tellus, 36A, 98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The Essence of Chaos. University of Washington PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lützen, J. (1990). Joseph Liouville (1809–1882): Master of Pure and Applied Mathematics. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, J. B. and Thornton, S. T. (1988). Classical Dynamics. Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
McComb, W. D. (1991). The Physics of Fluid Turbulence. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Merryfield, W. J., Cummins, P. F. and Holloway, G. (2001). Equilibrium statistical mechanics of barotropic flow over finite topography. J. Phys. Oceanog., 31, 1880–902.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T. (1996). The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolis, G. (1995). Introduction to Nonlinear Science. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paegle, J. and Robl, E. (1977). The time behavior of the probability density function of some simplified atmospheric flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 979–902.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. (1999). A nonlinear dynamical perspective on climate prediction. J. Climate, 12, 575–912.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. (2000). Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate. Rep. Prog. Phys., 63, 71–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, T. S. and Chua, L. O. (1989). Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems. Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penland, C. (1989). Random forcing and forecasting using principal oscillation pattern analysis. Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 2165–852.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penland, C. and Matrosova, L. (1994). A balance condition for stochastic numerical models with application to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J. Climate, 7, 1352–722.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, O. (1970). Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Risken, H. (1989). The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, R. (1998). Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Salmon, R., Holloway, G. and Hendershott, M. C. (1976). The equilibrium statistical mechanics of simple quasi-geostrophic models. J. Fluid Mech., 75, 691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J. and Hollingsworth, A. (2002). Some aspects of the improvement in skill in numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 647–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soize, C. (1994) The Fokker-Planck Equation for Stochastic Dynamical Systems and its Explicit Steady State Solutions. World Scientific
Stanišić, M. M. (1988). The Mathematical Theory of Turbulence. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, G. (1993). Introduction to Linear Algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge PressGoogle Scholar
Tatarskiy, V. I. (1969). The use of dynamic equations in the probability prediction of the pressure field. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Physics, 5, 293–7Google Scholar
Thompson, P. D. (1957). Uncertainty of initial state as a factor in the predictability of large scale atmospheric flow patterns. Tellus, 9, 275–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. (1972). Some exact statistics of two-dimensional viscous flow with random forcing. J. Fluid. Mech., 55, 711–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. (1983). Equilibrium statistics of two-dimensional viscous flows with arbitrary random forcing. Phys. Fluids, 26, 3461–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. (1985a). Prediction of probable errors of predictions. Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 248–592.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. (1985b). A statistical-hydrodynamical approach to problems of climate and its evolution. Tellus, 37A, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribbia, J. and Baumhefner, D. (1993). On the problem of prediction beyond the deterministic range. In Prediction of Interannual Climate Variations, ed. Shukla, J., pp. 251–65. NATO ASI Series, Vol. 16. SpringerGoogle Scholar
Tribbia, J. and Baumhefner, D. (2004). Scale interactions and atmospheric predictability: an updated perspective. Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 703–132.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampen, N. G. (1992). Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Weiss, J. B. (2003a). Coordinate invariance in stochastic dynamical systems. Tellus, 55A, 208–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, J. B. (2003b). Predictability and chaos. In Handbook of Weather, Climate, and Water: Dynamics, Climate, Physical Meteorology, Weather Systems, and Measurements, ed. Potter, T. D. and Colman, B. R., pp. 83–93. WileyGoogle Scholar
Zwillinger, D. (1989). Handbook of Differential Equations. Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×