Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:53:10.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Brooke A. Ackerly
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Maria Stern
Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Jacqui True
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeyesekera, Sunila. 1995. “Consolidating Our Gains at the World Conference on Human Rights (Vienna, 1993) and Dealing with our ‘Differences.’ ” <http://www.lolapress.org/artenglish/abeye4.htm>.
Acker, Joan, Kate Barry, and Joke Esseveld. 1983. “Objectivity and Truth: Problems in Doing Feminist Research.” Women's Studies International Forum 6, 4: 423–435. Also reprinted in Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, ed. Fonow, Mary Margaret and Cook, Judith A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke. 1995. “Testing the Tools of Development: Credit Programs, Loan Involvement, and Women's Empowerment.” IDS Bulletin 26, 3: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerly, Brooke. 2000. Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke. 2001. “Women's Human Rights Activists as Cross-Cultural Theorists.” International Journal of Feminist Politics 3, 3: 311–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke. 2003a. “Lessons from Deliberative Democratic Theory for Building Global Civil Society.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28–31.
Ackerly, Brooke 2003b. Review of Fields of Protest: Women's Movements in India, by Raka Ray; Feminists Doing Development: A Practical Critique, ed. Marilyn Porter and Ellen Judd; Human Development Report 2000: Human Rights and Development, by United Nations Development Programme; and Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, by Martha Nussbaum. Signs 29, 1: 248–254.
Ackerly, Brooke, and D. Bina D'Costa. 2004. “Transnational Feminism and the Human Rights Framework.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Montreal, March 17–20.
Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3, 3: 319–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agathangelou, Anna M. 2004. The Global Political Economy of Sex: Desire, Violence, and Insecurity in the Mediterranean Nation-States. London and New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Ishtiaq. 1996. State, Nation and Ethnicity in Contemporary Asia. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Akhter, Shahin, Begum, Suraia, Hossain, Hameeda, Kamal, Sultana, and Guhathakurta, Meghna, eds. N.d. Narir Ekattur o Judhyo Porobortee Kothyokahini. Dhaka: Ain-o-Shalish Kendro.
Alker, Hayward. 1996. Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, Mats, and Billing, Yvonne Due. 1997. Understanding Gender and Organizations. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Andrews, Bruce. 1980. “Poetry as Explanation, Poetry as Praxis.” In The Politics of Poetic Form: Poetry and Public Policy, ed. Bernstein, Charles. New York: Roof Books, 23–43.Google Scholar
An-Na'im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1992. “Toward a Cross-cultural Approach.” In Human Rights in Cross-cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus, ed. An-Na'im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria, ed. 1990. Making Face, Making Soul, Haciendo Caras: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Feminists of Color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Apodaca, Clair. 1998. “Measuring Women's Economic and Social Rights Achievement.” Human Rights Quarterly 20, 1: 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apodaca, Clair. 2000. “The Effects of Foreign Aid on Women's Attainment of their Economic and Social Human Rights.” Journal of Third World Studies 17, 2: 205–230.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Arat, Zehra F. 1991. Democracy and Human Rights in Developing Countries. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Arbetslivsinstitutets rapport 2004. Homo- och bisexuellas arbetsvillkor. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.
Aretxaga, Begona. 1997. Shattering Silence: Women, Nationalism and Political Subjectivity in Northern Ireland. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arias, Arturo, ed. 2001. The Rigoberta Menchú Controversy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1966. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Art Newspaper. 2002. “The Year in Review, June 2001–June 2002.” 1: 34.
Art Newspaper. 2003a. “We Serve all Cultures, Say the Big, Global Museums.” 132: 1–6.
Art Newspaper. 2003b. “Global Values.” 132: 2.
Asad, Talal. 1973. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1989. “Living on the Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War.” In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, eds. Derian, James, and Shapiro, Michael J.. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K., and Walker, Robert B. J.. 1990. “Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 34, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askin, Kelly. 1997. War Crimes Against Women: Prosecution in International War Crimes Tribunal. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Aslanbeigui, Nahid, Pressman, Steven, and Summerfield, Gale, eds. 1994. Women in the Age of Economic Transformation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. 1985. The Handmaid's Tale. New York: Fawcett.Google Scholar
Ayoob, Mohammed. 1995. The Third World Security Predicament: State-making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Baden, Sally, and Goetz, Anne-Marie. 1997. “Why Do We Need Sex When We've Got Gender?Feminist Review 56: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baca Zinn, Maxine, Cannon, Lynn Weber, Higginbotham, Elizabeth, and Dill, Bonnie Thornton. 1986. “The Costs of Exclusionary Practices in Women's Studies.” Signs 11, 2: 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Isabella, ed. 1994. The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bannerji, Himani. 1995. Thinking Through: Essays on Feminism, Marxism and Anti-Racism. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Lindsay. 2001. The Prime Minister's Christmas Card: “Blue Poles” and Cultural Politics in the Whitlam Era. Sydney: Power Publications.Google Scholar
Barry, Peter. 2002. Beginning Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, Fredrick. 1969. The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Oslo: Universitetsförlaget.Google Scholar
Basu, Amrita, ed. 1995. The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women's Movements in Global Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Janet. 1993. “Ma'ssoum's Tale: The Personal and Political Transformations of a Young Iranian ‘Feminist’ and her Ethnographer.” Feminist Studies 19, 3: 519–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, John, and Smith, Steve, eds. 2001. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Second ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, Mary. 2004. The Parthenon. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Begum, Suraya. 2001. “Masuda, Elijan, Duljan, Momena: Kushtiar Charjon Grihobodhu.” In Narir Ekattur o Judhyo Porobortee Kothyokahini, ed. Akhter, Shahin, Begum, Suraia, Hossain, Hameeda, Kamal, Sultana, and Guhathakurta, Meghna. Dhaka: Ain-o-Shalish Kendro.Google Scholar
Behar, Ruth. 1993. Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza's Story. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary Field, Bond, Lynne A., and Weinstock, Jacqueline S.. 1997. A Tradition that Has No Name: Nurturing the Development of People, Families and Communities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bell, Diane, Caplan, Pat, and Karim, Wazir Jahan. 1993. Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belting, Hans, and Bill Viola. 2003. “A Conversation,” in Walsh, John, ed., Bill Viola: The Passions. Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 189–220.Google Scholar
Benería, Lourdes. 2003. Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benería, Lourdes, and Feldman, Shelley, eds. 1992. Unequal Burden: Economic Crises, Persistent Poverty, and Women's Work. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Benezra, Neal. 2001. “Sculpture and Paradox,” in Juan Muñoz, ed. Benezra, Neal, , Olga M. Viso, Brenson, Michael, Schimmel, Paul, Washington: Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Rikard, Ericson, Magnus, Hall, Martin, and Kronsell, Annica. 2001. Perspektiv på Världspolitik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1995. “Feminism and Postmodernism: An Uneasy Alliance.” In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange, Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Fraser, Nancy, and Cornell, Drucilla. Introduction by Linda Nicholson. New York: Routledge, 17–34.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “The Generalized and the Concrete Other.” In Feminism as Critique, ed. Benhabib, Seyla and Carnell, Drucilla. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. 1996. Feminism as Critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Fraser, Nancy, and Cornell, Drucilla. 1995. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. Introduction by Linda Nicholson. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berggren, Anders. 2002. Undercover Operations in No-women's Land: The Swedish Armed Forces through a Gender Lens, PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, Lund University.
Berggren, Anders W., and Ivarsson, Sophia. 2002. “Jakten sätter på Attacken.”Stockholm: Försvarshögskolan.Google Scholar
Bertaux, Daniel, and Thompson, Paul. 1993. International Yearbook of Oral History and Life Stories: Between Generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Best, Jacqueline. 2003. “Moralizing Finance: The New Financial Architecture as Ethical Discourse.” Review of International Political Economy, 10, 3, 579–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K., 1993. The Location of Culture. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K.. 1994. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K.., ed. 1990. Nation and Narration. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Jacqueline. 1998. “‘Get Back to Where You Once Belonged’: Identity, Citizenship, and Exclusion in Europe.” Human Rights Quarterly 20, 3: 592–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Kum-Kum. 1993. “Tracing the Contours: Feminist Research and Feminist Objectivity.” Women's Studies International Forum 16, 2: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billson, Janet Mancini. 1991. “The Progressive Verification Method: Toward a Feminist Methodology for Studying Women Cross-Culturally.” Women's Studies International Forum 14, 3: 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blacklock, Cathy, and Macdonald, Laura. 1998. “Human Rights and Citizenship in Guatemala and Mexico: From ‘Strategic’ to ‘New’ Universalism?Social Politics 5, 2: 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. 1997. “Forget IR Theory.” Alternatives 22: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. 2000a. Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. ed. 2000b. “On Authority – Strolling through the Wall: Everyday Poetics of Cold War Politics.” Alternatives: Social Transformation and Human Governance 25, 3: 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomgren, Ebbe, and Ove Lind. 1997. Kvinna som man är … LI Serie, T:2, Stockholm: Försvarshögskolan.
Bloom, Leslie Rebecca. 1998. Under the Sign of Hope: Feminist Methodology and Narrative Interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela, and James, Susan, eds. 1992. Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken, ed. 1998. Statecraft and Security: The Cold War and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Ken, and Smith, Steve. 1995. International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boris, Eileen, and Prügl, Elisabeth, eds. 1996. Homeworkers in Global Perspective: Invisible No More. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1970. Woman's Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bouvard, Marguerite Guzman. 1994. Revolutionizing Motherhood: The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Bowles, Gloria, and Duelli-Klein, Renate, eds. 1983. Theories of Women's Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brah, Avtar. 1993. “Re-Framing Europe: En-gendered Racisms, Ethnicities and Nationalisms in Contemporary Western Europe.” Feminist Review 45: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, Lisa. 1994. Public Opinion, International Security Policy, and Gender: The United States and Great Britain since 1945. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
Brocklehurst, Helen. 1999. “Painting International Relations.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1, 2: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossard, Nicole. 1980. “Poetic Politics.” In The Politics of Poetic Form: Poetry and Public Policy, ed. Bernstein, C.. New York: Roof Books, 73–86.Google Scholar
Broude, Norma, and Garrard, Mary, eds. 1992. The Expanding Discourse: Feminism and Art History. New York: IconEditions of HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2001. Politics Out of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Bruce, Judith. 1989. “Homes Divided.” World Development. 17, 7: 979–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 2003. Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Annette Wolbert. 1995. “Rape Trauma Syndrome.” In Rape and Society: Readings on the Problem of Sexual Assualt, eds. Searles, Patricia, and Berger, Ronald. Boulder: Westview Press, 239–245.Google Scholar
Busia, Abena P. A., 1996. “On Cultures of Communication: Reflections from Beijing.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22, 1: 204–210.Google Scholar
Butalia, Urvashi. 1995a. “Muslims and Hindus, Men and Women: Communal Stereotypes and the Partition of India.” In Women and Right-wing Movements: Indian Experiences, ed. Sarkar, Tanika, and Butalia, Urvashi. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Butalia, Urvashi. 1995b. “A Question of Silence: Partition, Women and the State.” In Gender and Catastrophe, ed. Lentin, Ronit. London: Zed Books, 92–109.Google Scholar
Butalia, Urvashi. 1998. The Other Side of Silence: Voices from the Partition of India. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butalia, Urvashi. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. [1983] 1991. Peoples, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and Wilde, Jaap. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1996. “Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics, and the Anarchical World.” In Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities, ed. Shapiro, Michael J., and Alker, Hayward R.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David, and Dillon, Michael, eds. 1993. The Political Subject of Violence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David, and Shapiro, Michael J., eds. 1999. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cancian, Francesca. 1992. “Feminist Science: Methodologies that Challenge Inequality.” Gender and Society 6, 4: 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2000. “Gendered Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 37, 1: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2003. “Feminist Phallacies or Scientific Certainties? Examining Feminist Criticisms of Feminist Empiricists and of ‘Mainstream’ IR.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Portland, February 26–March 1.
Caprioli, Mary. 2004. “Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology.” International Studies Review 6, 2: 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary, and Boyer, Mark. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45, 4: 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 36, 3: 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstedt, Berit. 2003. Vilka kvinnor mönstrar och får uttagning till plikttjänst, Försvarshögskolan, ILM Serie T:29.
Carment, David, and James, Patrick, eds. 1998. Peace in the Midst of Wars: Preventing and Managing International Ethnic Conflicts. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2002. “Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint?International Studies Review 4, 3: 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2003. “Stirring Gender into the Mainstream: Feminism, Constructivism and the Uses of Theory.” International Studies Review 5, 2: 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Marilyn. 1991. Women and Food Security: The Experience of the SADCC Countries. London: IT Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Terrell, Cochran, Molly, and Squires, Judith. 1998. “Gendering Jones.” Review of International Studies 24, 2: 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Terrell, Zalewski, Marysia, Kinsella, Helen, and Carpenter, R. Charli. 2003. “The Forum: Gender and International Relations.” International Studies Review 5, 2: 287–302.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chan-Tiberghien, Jennifer. 2004. “Gender-skepticism or Gender Boom? Poststructural Feminisms, Transnational Feminisms, and the World Conference Against Racism.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 6, 3: 454–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, Hillary. 1994–5. “Feminist Critics of International Law and Their Critics.” In Third World Legal Studies, special issue, Women's Rights and Traditional Law: A Conflict? I, ed. Penelope E. Andrews.
Chatterjee, Partha. 1993. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2004. “Social Constructivism in Global and European Politics.” Review of International Studies 30, 2: 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Christine. 1998. In Service and Servitude: Foreign Female Domestic Workers and the Malaysian “Modernity” Project. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1989. Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. 1993. Writing Diaspora: Tactics of Intervention in Contemporary Cultural Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Anne Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth J., and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2001. “Latin American NGOs and Governments: Coalition Building at UN Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women.” Latin American Research Review 36, 3: 7–35.Google Scholar
Clark, Anne Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth J., and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 1998. “The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in Global UN Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women.” World Politics 51, 1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1986. Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly. 1999. Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia. 1998. The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identity in Conflict Zones. London: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia. 2004. The Line: Women, Partition and the Gender Order in Cyprus. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1995. “How Do We Know? Questions of Method in Feminist Practice.” In Changing Methods: Feminists Transforming Practice, ed. Burt, Sandra, and Code, Lorraine. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1988. “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals.” Signs 12, 4: 687–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1993. “War, Wimps, and Women: Talking Gender and Thinking War.” In Gendering War Talk, ed. Cooke, Miriam, and Woollacott, Angela. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 397–409.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems 33, 6: 514–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1989. “The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought.” Signs 14: 745–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. [1986] 1991. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” In Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, ed. Fonow, Mary Margaret, and Cook, Judith. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 35–59.Google Scholar
Committee on Status of Women in the Profession, 2001. “The Status of Women in Political Science: Female Participation in the Professoriate and the Study of Women and Politics in the Discipline.” PS, June 2001: 319–332.
Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Robert W.. 1995. Masculinities. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Robert W.. 1998. “Masculinities and Globalization.” Men and Masculinities 1, 1: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1991. Identity/Difference. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Costas. 2001. “Hippopolis/Cynopolis.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30, 3: 785–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Judith A., and Fonow, Mary Margaret. 1986. “Knowledge and Women's Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research.” Sociological Inquiry 56, 1: 2–29. Reprinted in Feminist Research Methods, ed. Joyce McCarl Nielsen. Boulder: Westview Press, 1990, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copelon, Rhonda. 1995. “Gendered War Crimes: Reconceptualizing Rape in Time of War.” In Women's Rights Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives, ed. Peters, Julie, and Wolper, Andrea. New York: Routledge, 197–214.Google Scholar
Corbetta, Piergiorgio. 2003. Social Research: Theory, Methods, Techniques. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert W. [1981] 1996. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” In Cox, Robert W., Approaches to World Order, with Timothy J. Sinclair. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–123.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W.. 1992. “Multilateralism and World Order.” Review of International Studies 18, 2: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert W.. 1995a. “Civilisations: Encounters and Transformations.” Studies in Political Economy 47: 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert W.. 1995b. “Critical Political Economy.” In International Political Economy: Under Global Disorder, ed. Hettne, Bjorn. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W.. 1999a. “Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order.” Review of International Studies 25, 1: 3–28.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W.. 1999b. “Thinking about Civilizations.” Lecture to the Annual Meeting of the British International Studies Association, December.
Cox, Robert W.. 2001a. “The Way Ahead: Toward a New Ontology of World Order.” In Critical Theory and World Politics, ed. Jones, Richard Wyn. Boulder: Westview Press, 45–59.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W.. 2001b. “Civilizations and the Twenty-First Century: Some Theoretical Considerations.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1, 1: 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert W., and Schechter, Michael G.. 2003. Political Economy of a Plural World: Critical Reflections on Power, Morals and Civilizations. New York: Routledge/RIPE Studies in Global Political Economy.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberley. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” The University of Chicago Legal Forum: 139–167.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberley. 2000. “Gender-Related Aspects of Race Discrimination.” Background Paper for the Expert Meeting on Gender-related Aspects of Race Discrimination, November 21–24, 2000, Zagreb, Croatia. United Nations, Division for the Advancement of Women, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Development Fund for Women.
Culbertson, Roberta. 1995. “Embodied Memory, Transcendence, and Telling: Recounting Trauma, Reestablishing the Self.” New Literary History 26: 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 4: 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Arlene. 1975. “Feminist Perspectives in Sociological Research.” In Another Voice, ed. Millman, Marcia, and Kanter, Rosabeth. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 340–382.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 1994. “Moral Orientations to Suffering: Legitimation, Power, and Healing.” In Health and Social Change in International Perspective, ed. Chen, Lincoln C., Kleinman, Arthur, and Ware, Norma C.. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 1995. Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Karen. 1997. “Understanding Women's Exit from the Canadian Forces: Implications for Integration.” In Wives and Warriors, ed. Weinstein, Laurie, and White, Christie. London: Bergin and Garvey, 179–198.Google Scholar
D'Costa, D. Bina. 2003. The Gendered Construction of Nationalism: From Partition to Creation. PhD dissertation. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
D'Costa, D. Bina. Forthcoming. “Coming to Terms with the Past: Forming Feminist Alliances across Borders.” In Feminist Networks, Peoples Movements and Alliances: Learning from the Ground, vol.1: Feminist Politics, Activism and Vision: Local and Global Challenges, ed. Luciana Ricciutelli, Angela Miles and Margaret McFadden. London: Zed Books.
Lauretis, Teresa. 1990. “Eccentric Subjects: Feminist Theory and Historical Consciousness.” Feminist Studies 16, 1: 115–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montigny, Gerald. 1995. Social Working: An Ethnography of front-line Practice. Toronto: Toronto University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deising, Paul. 1991. How Does Social Science Work? Reflections on Practice. Pitt Series in Policy and Institutional Studies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K., 1995. “Messy Methods for Communication Research.” Journal of Communication 45, 2 (Spring): 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derian, James, and Shapiro, Michael J.. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeVault, Marjorie L., 1990. “Talking and Listening from Women's Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Interviewing and Analysis.” Social Problems 37, 1: 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVault, Marjorie L.. 1996. “Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVault, Marjorie L.. 1999. Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard. 2001a. “Critical Theory.” In Theories of International Relations, Second Edition, ed. Burchill, Scott, and Linklater, Andrew, with Devetak, Richard, Paterson, Matthew, and True, Jacqui. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2001b. “Postmodernism.” In Theories of International Relations, Second Edition, ed. Burchill, Scott, and Linklater, Andrew, with Devetak, Richard, Paterson, Matthew, and True, Jacqui. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard, and Higgott, Richard. 1999. “Justice Unbound?: Globalization, States, and the Transformation of the Social Bond.” International Affairs 75, 3: 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1939. Intelligence in the Modern World: John Dewey's Philosophy, ed. Ratner, Joseph. New York: Random House (Modern Library).Google Scholar
Díaz-Polanco, Héctor. 1997. Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: The Quest for Self-Determination. Latin American Perspectives Series, 18.
Dickinson, T., and. Schaeffer, R., 2001. Fast Forward: Work, Gender and Protest in a Changing World. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dillon, Michael. 1990–1. “The Alliance of Security and Subjectivity”. Current Research on Peace and Violence, Tampere Peace Research Institute, XIII: 3.
Dillon, Michael. 1996. Politics of Security. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2003. “Impartiality, Storytelling, and the Seductions of Narrative: An Essay at an Impasse.” Alternatives 28: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollar, David, and Kraay, Aart. 2002. “Spreading the Wealth.” Foreign Affairs 81, 1: 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1989. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Doty, Roxanne L., 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dowd, Siobhan. 1995. “Women and the Word: The Silencing of the Feminine.” In Women's Rights Human Rights, ed. Peters, Julie and Wolper, Andrea. New York and London: Routledge, 317–323.Google Scholar
Dowling, Colette. 2000. The Frailty Myth: Women Approaching Physical Equality. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Draucker, Claire Burke. 1999. “The Psychotherapeutic Needs of Women Who Have Been Sexually Assaulted.” Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 35: 18–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Driscoll, Kathleen, and Joan McFarland. 1989. “The Impact of a Feminist Perspective on Research Methologies: Social Sciences.” In The Effects of Feminist Approaches on Research Methodologies, ed. Tomm, Winnie. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 185–203.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, Barbara. 1983. “Passionate Scholarship: Notes on Values, Knowing and Method in Feminist Social Science.” In Theories of Women's Studies, ed. Bowles, Gloria, and Klein, Renate Duelli. London: Routledge, 105–116.Google Scholar
Duncan, Carol. 1990. “Letters to the Editor.” Art Journal 49, 2: 207.Google Scholar
Dutton-Douglas, Mary Ann, and Walker, Lenore E. A.. 1988. Feminist Psychotherapies: Integration of Therapeutic and Feminist Systems. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Edkins, Jenny. 1999. Post-Structuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar
Edkins, Jenny. 2004. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edkins, Jenny, Pin-Fat, Véronique, and Persam, Nalini, eds. 1999. Sovereignty and Subjectivity. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar
Eduards, Maud. 2002. Förbjuden handling: Om kvinnors organisering och feministisk teori. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Edwards, Rosalind. 1990. “Connecting Method and Epistemology: A White Woman Interviewing Black Women.” Women's Studies International Forum 13, 5: 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, Tracy Bachrach. 1990. Silent Looms: Women and Production in a Guatemalan Town. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara, Pollit, Katha, Ferguson, R. Brian, and Jaquette, Jane. 1999. “Fukuyama's Follies: So What if Women Ruled the World?Foreign Affairs 78, 1: 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard. 2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990–2003.” International Security 28, 1: 110–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elam, Diane. 1994. Feminism and Deconstruction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita. 2004. Fashioning Inequality. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Elkins, James. 2004. Pictures and Tears. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elman, R. Amy. 1996. Sexual Subordination and State Intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Providence, Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1985. “Reflections on War and Political Discourse: Realism, Just War, and Feminism in a Nuclear Age.” Political Theory 13, 1: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1987. Women and War. Great Britain: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1988. “The Problem with Peace.” Millennium 17, 3: 441–449.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1989. Women and War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1998. Political Mothers. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elson, Diane, ed. 1991. Male Bias in the Development Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Emeagwali, Gloria T., 1995. Women Pay the Price, Structural Adjustment in Africa and the Caribbean. Trenton: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich, with Marx, Karl. 1972 [1884]. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1996. “Margins, Silences, and Bottom-rungs: How to Overcome the Underestimation of Power in the Study of International Relations.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, ed. Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 186–202.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2001. “Interview with Professor Cynthia Enloe.” Review of International Studies 27, 4: 649–666.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: searching for Women in a New age of Empire. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 1993. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Eriksson Baaz, Maria. 2004. The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Eschle, Catherine. 2001. Global Democracy, Social Movements, and Feminism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, and Alvarez, Sonia E., eds. 1992. The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy and Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 1999. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fahlstedt, Krister. 2000. “Studie over situationen för homosexuella inom Försvarsmakten”, unpublished paper, Stockholm: Försvarshögskolan FHS/MI.
Falk, Richard. 2000. Human Rights Horizons: The Pursuit of Justice in a Globalizing World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farrell, Susan A. 1992. “Feminism and Sociology. Introduction: The Search for a Feminist/Womanist Methodology in Sociology.” In Revolutions in Knowledge: Feminism in the Social Sciences, ed. Zalk, Sue Rosenberg, and Gordon-Kelter, Janice. Boulder: Westview Press, 57–62.Google Scholar
Faust, David, and Nagar, Richa. 2003. “Third World NGOs and US Academics: Dilemmas and Politics of Collaboration.” Ethics, Place and Environment, 6, 1: 73–78.Google Scholar
Feldman, Shelley. 1999. “Feminist Interruptions: The Silence of East Bengal in the Story of Partition.” Interventions 1, 2: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 2002. “On Conceiving Motherhood and Sexuality: A Feminist-Materialist Approach.” In The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Theory and Politics, ed. Holmstrom, Nancy. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E., 1993. The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Mangala Subramaniam. 2000. “The International Women's Movement at Century's End.” In Gender Mosaics: Social Perspectives, ed. Vannoy, Dana. Los Angeles: Roxbury, 496–506.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Mangala Subramaniam. 2001. “The International Women's Movement at Century's End.” In Gender Mosaics: Social Perspectives, ed. Vannoy, Dana. Los Angeles: Roxbury, 496–506.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Berenice. 1984. “What is Feminist Method?” Feminist Review (New Women's Times), May/June.
Flax, Jane. 1987. “Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory.” Signs 12, 4: 621–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1990. Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann, ed. 2000. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Fonow, Mary Margaret, and Cook, Judith A.. 1991a. Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fonow, Mary Margaret, and Cook, Judith A.. 1991b. “Back to the Future: A Look at the Second Wave of Feminist Epistemology and Methodology.” In Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, ed. Fonow, Mary Margaret, and Cook, Judith A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–15.Google Scholar
Försvarsdepartmentet. 1995. Konferens för kvinnliga officerare och aspiranter i Eskilstuna 5–6 April. Conference proceedings. Stockholm: The Defense Ministry.
Försvarshögskolan. 2002. Långsamt framåt marsch. Conference Proceedings of a Nordic Conference on Women's Integration in the Defense.
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2004. “Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace after the Civil War.” International Studies Quarterly 48, 2: 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Ed. and trans. C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2001. “Power/Knowledge.” In The New Social Theory Reader, ed. Seidman, Steven, and Alexander, Jeffrey. London: Routledge, 69–75.Google Scholar
Fraser, Arvonne S., 1987. The UN Decade for Women: Documents and Dialogue. Westview Special Studies on Women in Contemporary Society. Boulder and London: Westview.Google Scholar
Fraser, Arvonne S.. 1999. “Becoming Human: The Origins and Development of Women's Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 21: 853–906.
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109–42.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “Politics, Culture, and the Public Sphere: Toward a Postmodern Conception.” In Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics, ed. Nicholson, Linda, and Seidman, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 287–312.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1996. “False Antitheses.” In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Fraser, Nancy, and Cornell, Drucilla. New York: Routledge, 59–74.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B., ed. 2002. Inequality around the World. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth J. 1995. “Women's Human Rights: The Emergence of a Movement.” In Women's Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives, ed. Peters, Julia, and Wolper, Andrea. New York: Routledge, 18–35.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth Jay, Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Clark, Ann Marie. 2001. “Sovereign Limits and Regional Opportunities for Global Civil Society in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 36, 3:7–35.Google Scholar
Frontiers. 1993. Special issue, “Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork.” 13, 3: 1–103.
Frost, Mervyn, 1996. Ethics in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1998. “Women and the Evolution of World Politics.” Foreign Affairs 77, 5: 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumerton, Richard. “Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2000 Edition), Edward N. Zalta, ed. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2000/entries/justep-foundational>. Accessed January 6, 2005.
Funtowicz, Silvio, and Ravetz, Jerome. 1997. “The Poetry of Thermodynamics.” Futures 29, 9: 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Christina, and Macdonald, Laura. 1994. “Women's Transnational Organizing in the Context of NAFTA: Forging Feminist Internationality.” Millennium 23, 3: 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Christina, and Macdonald, Laura. “NAFTA and Economic Restructuring: Some Gender and Race Implications.” In Rethinking Restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada, ed. Bakker, Isabella. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 165–186.
Galbraith, James K., Pitt, Joe W. III, and Wells-Dang, Andrew. 2002. “Is Inequality Decreasing: Debating the Wealth and Poverty of Nations.” Foreign Affairs 81, 4: 178–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Nancy. 1993. “The Gender Gap in Popular Attitudes Toward the Use of Force.” In Women and the Use of Military Force, ed. Howes, Ruth and Stevenson, Michael. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Garlick, Steve. 2004. “Distinctly Feminine: On the Relationship Between Men and Art,”Berkeley Journal of Sociology 48: 108–125.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geiger, Susan. 1992. “What's So Feminist about Doing Women's Oral History?” In Johnson-Odim, Cheryl and Strobel, Margaret, eds. Expanding the Boundaries of Women's History: Essays on Women in the Third World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 305–318.Google Scholar
Gellately, Robert, and Keirnan, Ben. 2003. The Specter of Genocide: Mass Murder in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Jim. 1994. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical Re-Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia. 1995. Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gibson, Katherine, Law, Lisa, and McKay, Deidre. 2001. “Beyond Heroes and Victims: Filipina Contract Migrants, Economic Activism and Class Transformations.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 3, 3: 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Stephen, and Mittleman, James, eds. 1997. Innovation and Transformation in International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Angus. 1999. Twin Towers: The Life of New York City's World Trade Center. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Global Survival Network. 1997. Crime and Servitude: An Exposé of the Traffic in Women for Prostitution from the Newly Independent States. A report in collaboration with the International League for Human Rights, Washington.
Gluck, Sherna B. 1977. “What's So Special About Women? Women's Oral History.” Frontiers 2, 2: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, Sherna B., and Patai, Daphne, eds. 1991. Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie. 1991. “Feminism and the Claim to Know: Contradictions in Approaches to Women in Development.” In Gender and International Relations, ed. Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 133–157.Google Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie, and Sen Gupta, Rina. 1996. “Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power, and Control Over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programmes in Bangladesh.” World Development 24, 1: 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Patricia, and Dunn, Kevin, eds. 2004. Identity and Global Politics. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golde, Peggy. 1970. Women in the Field: Anthropological Experiences. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 1996. International Relations. Second ed. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 2001. War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, eds. 2001. The Legalization of World Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Avery. 2001. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Deborah A., 1993. “Worlds of Consequences: Feminist Ethnography as Social Action.” Critique of Anthropology 13, 4: 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorelick, Sherry. 1991. “Contradictions of Feminist Methodology.” Gender and Society 5, 4: 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen, eds. 1991. Gender and International Relations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Linda. 1999. Fear as a Way of Life: Mayan Widows in Rural Guatemala. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Grewal, Inderpal, and Kaplan, Caren. 1996. Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gugelberger, Georg M., ed. 1996. The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Akhil, and Ferguson, James, eds. 1997. Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh. 1996. Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara. 1989. “Sexuality in the Workplace: Key Issues in Social Research and Organizational Practice.” In The Sexuality of Organization, ed. Hearn, Jeff, Sheppard, Deborah, Tancred-Sherif, Peta, and Burrell, Gibson. London: Sage Publications, 56–77.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano, and Jung, Dietrich. 2003. Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research. New International Relations Series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hacker, Sally L. 1990. “Doing It the Hard Way.” In Investigations of Gender and Technology, ed. Smith, Dorothy E., and Turner, Susan M.. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 175–194.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, and duGay, Paul, eds. 1996. Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 1988. “Hidden from International Relations: Women and the International Arena.” Millennium 17, 3: 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. Sunny, Elizabeth M. P. Gama, and Amy K. Harkins. 2002. “Revisiting Gender Issues in Multicultural Counseling.” In Counseling across Cultures, ed. Pedersen, Paul B., Draguns, Juris G., Lonner, Walter J., and , Joseph E. Trimble. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 163–184.Google Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2000. “The Little Mermaid's Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School.” Millennium 29, 2: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Thomas Blom and Stepputat, Finn, eds. 2001. States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14, 3: 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. ed. 1987a. Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987b. “Introduction. Is There a Feminist Method?” In Feminism and Methodology, ed. Harding, Sandra. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: ‘What is Strong Objectivity?’ ” In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth. London: Routledge: 49–82.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialism, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Maxine. 1998. Trauma Recovery and Empowerment: A Clinician's Guide for Working with Women in Groups. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M.. 1998. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M.. [1983] 2003. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, second ed., ed. Harding, Sandra, and Hintinkka, Merrill B.. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Hashemi, Syed, Schuler, Sidney Ruth, and Riley, Ann P.. 1996. “Rural Credit Programs and Women's Empowerment in Bangladesh.” World Development 24, 4: 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 1989. “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth.” Signs 14: 533–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla B. 1994. “Fifteen Truth Commissions, 1974–1994: A Comparative Perspective.” Human Rights Quarterly 16: 597–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla B.. 2001. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff, Sheppard, Deborah L., Tancred-Sheriff, Peta, and Burrell, Gibson, eds. 1989. The Sexuality of Organization. London, Newbury Park, and New Dehli: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff, and Parkin, Wendy. 2001. Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Dehli: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Heinrich Boll Foundation. 1996. Conference Proceedings: Sex Work, Sex Tourism, and Trafficking in Women: A New Reality in Eastern Europe. Prague.
Hekman, Susan. 1997. “Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs 22, 2: 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan., ed. 1999. Feminism, Identity, and Difference. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Rosemary. 1993. Materialist Feminism and the Politics of Discourse. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hensley, Laura G. 2002. “Treatment for Survivors of Rape: Issues and Intervention.” Journal of Mental Health Counseling 24, 4: 330–348.Google Scholar
Herbert, Melissa. 2000. Camouflage Isn't Only for Combat: Gender, Sexuality and Women in the Military. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hirdman, Yvonne. 1990. “Genussystemet.” SOU 1990: 44, Demokrati och Makt i Sverige. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
Hirdman, Yvonne. 2001. Genus: om det stabilas föränderliga former. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1992. Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J.. 1997. “Feminist Standpoint as Postmodern Strategy.” Women and Politics 18, 3: 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 1989. Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Hooper, Charlotte. 1998. “Masculinist Practices and Gender Politics: The Operation of Multiple Masculinities in International Relations.” In The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations, ed. Zalewski, Marysia and Parpart, Jane. Boulder: Westview Press, 28–53.Google Scholar
Hooper, Charlotte. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosken, Fran. 1976. “Editorial” and “Women and Rape/Women and Violence”. Women's International Network News1975 2, 1. Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit, and Manheim, Bruce, eds. 1979. The Politics of Anthropology: From Colonialism and Sexism Toward a View from Below. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. 1990. “Notes for an Oppositional Poetics.” In The Politics of Poetic Form: Poetry and Public Policy, ed. Bernstein, C.. New York: Roof Books, 197–212.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, and Woods, Ngaire. 1999. Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, Perdita. 1979. Third World Women Speak Out. New York: Praeger, and Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2000. “Towards a Feminist International Ethics.” Review of International Studies 26, special issue (December): 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylland Eriksen, Thomas. 1993. Ethnicity and Nationalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Nilima. 1998. Ami Birangana Bolchi. Dhaka: Jagriti Prokashoni.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labor Organization. 2001. Stopping Forced Labor. Geneva: ILO.
International Studies Quarterly. 1990. Special issue, “Dissident Voices.” 34, 3.
International Studies Review. 2003. Special issue, “The Forum: Gender and International Relations.” 5, 2: 287–302.
“Interview with Professor Cynthia Enloe.” 2001. Review of International Studies 27, 4: 649–666.
“Interview with Ken Waltz.” 1998. Review of International Studies 24, 3: 371–386.
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This Sex Which Is Not One. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ivarsson, Sophia. 2002. Diskurser kring kvinnor i uniform. Försvarshögskolan.Google Scholar
Ivarsson, Sophia, and Berggren, Anders W.. 2001. Avgångsorsaker bland officerare. Försvarshögskolan, LI Serie T:24.Google Scholar
Jabri, Vivienne. 2003. “Pinter, Radical Critique, and Politics.” Borderlands e-journal 2, 2. <http://www.borderlandsejournal.adelaide.edu.au>.Google Scholar
Jabri, Vivienne, and O'Gorman, Eleanor, eds. 1999. Women, Culture, and International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Mats. 1998. Man eller Monster: Kustjägarnas mandomsprov. Nora: Nya Doxa.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1989. “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology.” In Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing, ed. Jaggar, Alison M., and Bordo, Susan R.. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 145–171.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1995. “Care as a Feminist Practice of Moral Reason.” In Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics, ed. Held, Virginia. Boulder: Westview Press, 179–202.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M., and Bordo, Susan R., eds. 1989. Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Jahan, Rounaq. 1995. The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 2001. “The Political Unconscious.” In The New Social Theory Reader, ed. Seidman, Steven, and Alexander, Jeffrey. London: Routledge, 101–107.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane S., 1997. “Women in Power: From Tokenism to Critical Mass.” Foreign Policy 108: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayaratne, Toby Epstein, and Abigail Stewart. 1991. “Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Social Sciences: Current Feminist Issues and Practical Strategies.” In Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, ed. Fonow, Mary Margaret, and Cook, Judith A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 85–106.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta. 1999. “Shaping the Human Rights Agenda: The Case of Violence Against Women.” In Gender Politics in Global Governance, ed. Meyer, Mary K. and Prügl, Elisabeth. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 142–160.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta. 2003. “Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs and Women's Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 47, 2: 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, Robert C., 1982. “Toward an Alternative Security System: Moving Beyond the Balance of Power in the Search for World Security,” Alternatives: A Journal of World Policy 8: 293–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mairi, and Maiguashca, Bice. 1997. “Praxis and Emancipation: The Lessons of Feminist Theory in International Relations.” Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 100, 1: 27–41.Google Scholar
Jones, Adam. 1996. “Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Around?Review of International Studies 22, 4: 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Richard Wyn, ed. 2001. Critical Theory and World Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kabeer, Naila, and Subrahmanian, Ramya. 1996. Institutions, Relations and Outcomes: Framework and Tools for Gender-Aware Planning. IDS Discussion Paper 357. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Kahn, Jospeh. 2002. “Globalization Proves Disappointing.” The New York Times, March 21: A4.
Kandiyoti, Denise. 1991. “Identity and its Discontents: Women and the Nation.” Millennium 20, 3: 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Laura Duhan. 1994. “Women as Caretaker: An Archetype that Supports Patriarchal Militarism.” Hypatia 9, 2: 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Anne. 1994. “A Feminist, Qualitative Methodology: A Study of Women with Breast Cancer.” Qualitative Sociology 17, 3: 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest inside the Church and Military. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1987. “Feminism and Science.” In Sex and Scientific Inquiry, ed. Harding, Sandra, and O'Barr, Jean F.. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 233–246.Google Scholar
Kelly, Liz, Sheila Burton, and Linda Regan. 1994. “Researching Women's Lives or Studying Women's Oppression: What Constitutes Feminist Research?” In Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective, ed. Maynard, Mary, and Purvis, June. London: Taylor and Francis, 27–48.Google Scholar
Kempadoo, Kamala, and Doezema, Jo. 1998. Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistances, and Redefinitions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32, 4: 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1991. “International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint.” In Gender and International Relations, ed. Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 41–50.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1998. “Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 42, 1: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert. (ed.). 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Murray, Christopher L.. 2002. “Rethinking Human Security.” Political Science Quarterly 116, 4: 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, Helen. 2003a. “The Image Before the Weapon”: A Genealogy of the “Civilian” in International Law and Politics. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Kinsella, Helen. 2003b. “For a Careful Reading: The Conservatism of Gender Constructivism.” International Studies Review 5, 2: 294–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishwar, Madhu, and Vanita, Ruth, eds. 1984. In Search of Answers: Women's Voices from Manushi. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Klein, Renate Duelli. 1983. “How to Do What We Want to Do: Thoughts about Feminist Methodology.” In Theories of Women's Studies, ed. Bowles, Gloria, and Klein, Renate Duelli. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kleinfelder, Karen. 1993. The Artist, His Model, Her Image, His Gaze. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kofman, Eleanore, and Youngs, Gillian, eds. 1996. Globalization: Theory and Practice. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1996. “The Accomplishments of International Political Economy.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, ed. Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Keith, and Williams, Michael C., eds. 1997. Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, S. 1991. Social Science and the Self: Personal Essays on an Art Form. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kronsell, Annica. 2002. “Homeless in Academia: Homesteading as a Strategy for Change in a World of Hegemonic Masculinity.” In Women in Higher Education: Empowering Change, ed. DiGeorgio-Lutz, JoAnn. Westport: Praeger, 37–56.Google Scholar
Kronsell, Annica 2005. “Gendered Practices in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity: Reflections from Feminist Standpoint Theory.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7, 2: 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronsell, Annica, and Svedberg, Erika. 2001a. “The Duty to Protect: Gender in the Swedish Practice of Conscription.” Cooperation and Conflict 36, 2: 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronsell, Annica, and Svedberg, Erika. 2001b. “Emasculating the Duty to Defend? Gender Identities and Swedish Military Organization.” In Reconstructing the Means of Violence, ed. Elam, Mark. Brussels: European Commission, 88–107.Google Scholar
Kronsell, Annica, and Erika Svedberg. 2003. Conscription in Sweden: The Making of a Gendered Nation/State. Paper presented at ISA, Portland, February 26–March 1.
Kronsell, Annica, and Svedberg, Erika. 2006. “The Swedish Military Manpower Policy and their Gender Implications.” In The Changing Face of European Conscription, ed. Joenniemi, Pertti. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Gideon, Kunda. 1992. Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 137–160.Google Scholar
Elin, Kvande. 1999. “In the Belly of the Beast: Constructing Femininities in Engineering Organizations.” European Journal of Women's Studies 6, 3: 305–328.Google Scholar
Langness, L. L., and Frank, Geyla. 1981. Lives: An Anthropological Approach to Biography. Novato: Chandler and Sharp.Google Scholar
Yosef, Lapid. 1989. “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era.” International Studies Quarterly 33, 3: 235–254.Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef, and Kratochwil, Friedrich, eds. 1996. The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Patti, Lather. 2001. “Postbook: Working the Ruins of Feminist Ethnography.” Signs 27, 1: 199–227.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Leonard, Peter. 1984. Personality and Ideology: Towards a Materialistic Understanding of the Individual. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayle, Letherby. 2003. Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Liebes, Tamar, and Ribak, Rivka. 1994. “In Defense of Negotiated Readings: How Moderates on Each Side of the Conflict Interpret Intifada News.” Journal of Communication 44, 2: 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 1990. “The Problem of Community in International Relations.” Alternatives 15: 135–153.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 1992. “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View.” Millennium 21, 1: 77–98.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 1994. “Dialogue. Dialectic and Emancipation in International Relations at the End of the Post-war Age.” Millennium 23, 1: 119–131.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 1996. “Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State.” European Journal of International Relations 2: 77–103.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 1999. “The Evolving Spheres of International Justice.” International Affairs 75, 3: 473–482.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 2000. Theories of International Relations: Critical Concepts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andrew, Linklater. 2001. “The Changing Contours of Critical International Relations Theory,” in Jones, R. Wyn, ed., Critical Theory and World Politics. Boulder: Lynne Reinner: 23–43.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew, and MacMillan, John. 1995. Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lipschutz, Ronnie D., ed. 1995. On Security, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jean, Lipman-Blumen. 1976. “Toward a Homosocial Theory of Sex Roles: An Explanation of the Sex Segregation of Social Institutions.” Signs 1, 3: 15–31.Google Scholar
Ruth, Lister. 1997. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Locher, Birgit, and Prügl, Elisabeth. 2001. “Feminism and Constructivism: Worlds Apart or Sharing the Middle Ground?International Studies Quarterly 45, 1: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen E., 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Low, Goergiana, and Organista, Kurt C.. 2000. “Latinas and Sexual Assault: Towards Culturally Sensitive Assessment and Intervention.” Journal of Multicultural Social Work 8: 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe Benston, Margaret. 1989. “Feminism and System Design: Questions of Control.” In The Effects of Feminist Approaches on Research Methodologies, ed. Tomm, Winnie. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier Press, 205–223.Google Scholar
Lugones, María C., and Spelman, Elizabeth V.. 1983. “Have We Got a Theory For You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism and the Demand for ‘the Woman's Voice.’Women's Studies International Forum 6, 6: 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecelia, Lynch. 1999. Beyond Appeasement: Interpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jean-François, Lyotard. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jean-François, Lyotard. 1993. “The Other's Rights.” In Shute, S., and Hurley, S., eds., On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. New York: Basic Books, 135–147.Google Scholar
Anne, McClintock. 1993. “Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism, and the Family.” Feminist Review 45: 61–80.Google Scholar
Laura, Macdonald. 1994. “Globalising Civil Society: Interpreting International NGOs in Central America.” Millennium 23, 2: 267–285.Google Scholar
Linda, McDowell. 1999. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. “Crimes of War, Crimes of Peace.” In On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, ed. Shute, Stephen and Hurley, Susan. New York: Basic Books, 83–109.Google Scholar
McLure, Kirstie. 1992. “The Issue of Foundations: Scientized Politics, Politicized Science, and Feminist Critical Practice.” In Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. Butler, Judith, and Scott, Joan. London: Routledge, 341–368.Google Scholar
Bill, McSweeney. 1999. Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mama Maquin Organization of Guatemalan Refugee Women. 1994. From Refugees to Returnees. Chiapas, Mexico: Mama Maquin-CIAM.
Manchanda, Rita. 2001. “Where are the Women in South Asian Conflicts?” In Women, War and Peace in South Asia: Beyond Victimhood to Agency, ed. Manchanda, Rita. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 9–41.Google Scholar
Erin, Manning. 2003. “Negotiating Influence: Argentine Tango and a Politics of Touch,” Borderlands e-journal 2, 1. <http://www.borderlandsejournal.adelaide.edu.au>.Google Scholar
Mansbach, Richard, and Rhodes, Edward. 2000. Global Politics in a Changing World: A Reader. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jane, Mansbridge. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jane, Mansbridge. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’The Journal of Politics 61, 3: 628–657.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions : The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., Sproull, Lee S., and Tamuz, Michal. 1991. “Learning from Samples of One or Fewer.” Organization Science 2: 1–13. Also reprinted as Chapter 8 in James G. March, The Pursuit Of Organizational Intelligence. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999: 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Marianne H. 1998. “Different Communities/Different Realities/Different Encounters.” International Studies Quarterly 42, 1: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Marianne H. 2003. “Challenging Globalization: Towards a Feminist Understanding of Resistance.” Review of International Studies 29, special issue (December): 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Marianne, and Parpart, Jane L., eds. 1995. Feminism/Postmodernism/Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marchand, Marianne, and Runyan, Anne Sisson, eds. 2000. Gender and Global Restructuring: Sightings, Sites and Resistances. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
George, Marcus. 1992. Lives in Trust: The Fortunes of Dynastic Families in Late Twentieth-century America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
George, Marcus. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1843] 1967. “Letter to A. Ruge, September 1843.” In Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, ed. and trans. Easton, Loyd D., and Guddats, Kurt H.. New York: Doubleday Anchor, 211–215.Google Scholar
Maynard, Mary. 1994. “Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research.” In Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective, ed. Maynard, Mary, and Purvis, June. London: Taylor and Francis, 10–26.Google Scholar
Maynard, Mary, and Purvis, June. 1994. Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Amy, Mazur. 2003. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menon, Ritu. 1998. “Reproducing the Legitimate Community: Secularity, Sexuality, and the State in Postpartition India.” In Appropriating Gender: Women's Activism and Politicized Religion in South Asia, ed. Jeffrey, Patricia, and Basu, Amrita. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Menon, Ritu. 1999. “Editorial: Cartographies of Nations and Identities: A Post-partition Predicament.” Interventions 1, 2: 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, Ritu, and Kamla Bhasin. 1996. “Abducted Women, the State and Questions of Honor: Three Perspectives in the Recovery Operation in Post-partition India.” In Embodied Violence: Communalising Women's Sexuality in South Asia, ed. Jayawardena, Kumari, and Alwis, Malathi. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Menon, Ritu. 1998. Borders and Boundaries: Women in India's Partition. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Meola, Lynn. 1997. “Sexual Harassment in the Army,” in Weinstein, Laurie, and White, Christie C., eds., Wives and Warriors: Women and the Military in the US and Canada. Westport and London: Bergin and Garvey, 145–149.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1983. “Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research.” In Theories of Women's Studies, ed. Bowles, Gloria, and Klein, Renate Duelli. Boston: Routledge and Kegan, 117–139.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1991. “Women's Research or Feminist Research? The Debate Surrounding Feminist Science and Methodology.” In Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, ed. Fonow, Mary, and Cook, Judith A.. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 60–84.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria, and Shiva, Vandana. 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Branko, Milanovic. 2002. “True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculation Based on Household Surveys Alone.” Economic Journal 112 (January): 51–92.Google Scholar
Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2001. Special issue, “Images and Narratives in World Politics.” 30, 3.
Miller, Errol. 2001. “Gender, Power and Politics: An Alternative Perspective.” In Gender, Peace and Conflict, Skjelsbaek, Inger and Smith, Dan, eds. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Dehli: Sage Publications, 80–103.Google Scholar
Jennifer, Milliken. 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods,” European Journal of International Relations 5, 2: 225–254.Google Scholar
Minh-ha, Trinh T. 1989. Woman Native Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Information. 1984. History of Bangladesh War of Independence Documents, vol. 7. Dhaka: Ministry of Information, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh.
Martha, Minow. 1990. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martha, Minow. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, and Mary Lyndon Shanley. 1997. “Revisioning the Family: Relational Rights and Responsibilities.” In Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Shanley, Mary Lyndon, and Narayan, Uma. Cambridge: Polity Press, 84–108.Google Scholar
Mjøset, Lars, and Holde, Stephen. 2002. “Killing for the State, Dying for the Nation: An Introductory Essay on the Life Cycle of Conscription into Europe's Armed Forces.” Comparative Social Research, special issue: The Comparative Study of Conscription in the Armed Forces 20: i–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine M., ed. 1994. Identity Politics and Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in an International Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991a. “Introduction. Cartographies of Struggle: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, ed. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1–47.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991b. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, ed. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 51–80.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1997. “Women Workers and Capitalist Scripts: Ideologies of Domination, Common Interests, and the Politics of Solidarity.” In Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures, ed. Alexander, Jacqui, and Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes, eds. 1991. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Patricia, Molloy. 1995. “Subversive Strategies or Subverting Strategy? Towards a Feminist Pedagogy for Peace.” Alternatives 20: 225–242.Google Scholar
Patricia, Molloy. 1997. “Face to Face with the Dead Man: Ethical Responsibility, State-Sanctioned Killing, and Empathetic Impossibility.” Alternatives 22, 4: 467–492.Google Scholar
Molyneux, Maxine. 1998. “Analyzing Women's Movements.” In Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy, ed. Jackson, Cecile, and Pearson, Ruth. London and New York: Routledge, 65–88.Google Scholar
Moody-Adams, Michele M. 1997. Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture and Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Katherine, Moon. 1997. Sex Among Allies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Andrew, Moravcsik. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Post-war Europe.” International Organization 54, 2: 217–52.Google Scholar
Mudimbé, V. Y. 1988. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mudimbé, V. Y.. 1994. The Idea of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mudimbé, V. Y.. 1998. Nations, Identities, Cultures. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Laura, Mulvey. 1989. Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Muran, Elizabeth, and Raymond DiGiuseppe. 2000. “Rape Trauma.” In Cognitive Behavioral Strategies in Crisis Intervention. Second ed., eds. Datiilio, Frank, and Freeman, Arthur. New York: Guilford, 150–165.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig. 1998. “Six Masculine Roles in International Relations and Their Interconnection: A Personal Investigation.” In The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations, ed. Zalewski, Marysia, and Parpart, Jane. Boulder: Westview Press, 93–108.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 1972. “Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained from Studying Up.” In Reinventing Anthropology, ed. Hymes, Dell. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Richa, Nagar. 2002. “Footloose Researchers, Traveling Theories and the Politics of Transnational Feminist Praxis.” Gender, Place and Culture 9, 2: 179–186.Google Scholar
Nagar, Richa, Lawson, Victoria, McDowell, Linda, and Hanson, Susan. 2002. “Locating Globalization: Feminist (Re)readings of the Subjects and Spaces of Globalization.” Economic Geography 78, 3: 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagar, Richa, (in consultation with Farah Ali and the Sangatin Women's Collective). 2003. “Collaboration Across Borders: Moving Beyond Positionality.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24, 3: 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagar, Richa. 1997. “Exploring Methodological Borderlands Through Oral Narratives.” In Thresholds in Feminist Geography, ed. Jones, John Paul III, Nast, Heidi J., and Roberts, Susan M.. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 203–224.Google Scholar
Naples, Nancy A. 2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1989. “The Project of Feminist Epistemology: Perspectives from a Nonwestern Feminist.” In Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing, ed. Jaggar, Alison M., and Bordo, Susan R.. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 256–269.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1995. “Colonialism and its Others: Considerations on Rights and Care Discourses.” Hypatia 10, 2: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions and Third World Feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narayan, Deepa, with Patel, Raj, Schafft, Kai, Rademacher, Anne, and Koch-Schulte, Sarah. 2000. Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us?New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Uma, and Harding, Sandra, eds. 2000. Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Post-colonial, and Feminist World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ed. 1996. The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennifer, Nedelsky. 1993. “Reconceiving Rights as Relationship.” Review of Constitutional Studies 1, 1: 1–26.Google Scholar
Nelson, Diane M. 1999. A Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1993. “Epistemological Communities.” In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth. London: Routledge, 121–160.Google Scholar
Mark, Neufeld. 1993. “Reflexivity and International Relations Theory.” Millennium 22, 1: 53–76.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. 1998. “European Identity, EU Expansion, and the Integration/Exclusion Nexus.” Alternatives 23: 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victoria, Newhouse. 1998. Towards a New Museum. New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
Ngara, Abigail Urey. 1985. “Women: African Women Fight Circumcision.” Interpress Service. Harare, Zimbabwe, August 15, 1985.
Joyce McCarl, Nielsen, ed. 1990. Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Anne, Nilsson. 1990. Kvinnan som officer. Försvar i Nutid 90:2. Stockholm: Centralförbundet Folk och Försvar.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 1995. “Creativity and Chaos: War on the Frontlines.” In Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival, ed. Nordstrom, Carolyn and Robben, Antonius. Berkeley: University of California Press: 129–154.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 1997. A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, O'Brien, Scholte, Jan Aart, and Williams, Marc. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochberg, Richard L., and Rosenwald, George C., eds. 1992. Storied Lives: The Cultural Politics of Self-understanding. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Louiza, Oddysseos. 2001. “Laughing Matters: Peace, Democracy, and the Challenge of the Comic Narrative.” Millennium 30, 3: 709–732.Google Scholar
Patrick, O'Donnell. 2000. Latent Destinies: Cultural Paranoia and Contemporary U.S Narrative. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
John, O'Donohue. 2000. Conamara Blues. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Oguibe, Olu. 1994. “A Brief Note on Internationalism.” In Global Visions Towards a New Internationalism in the Visual Arts, ed. Fisher, Jean. London: Kala Press, 50–59.Google Scholar
Catherine, O'Leary. 1997. “Counteridentification or Counterhegemony? Transforming Feminist Standpoint Theory.” Women and Politics 18, 3: 45–72.Google Scholar
Olson, Karen, and Linda Shopes. 1991. “Crossing Boundaries, Building Bridges: Doing Oral History among Working-Class Women and Men.” In Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, eds. Gluck, Herna B. and Patai, Daphne. New York: Routledge: 189–204.
O'Neill, Onora. 1992. “Justice, Gender and International Boundaries.” In The Quality of Life, ed. Nussbaum, Martha, and Sen, Amartya. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1994. “Justice and Boundaries.” In Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives, ed. Brown, ChrisLondon: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 2000. Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susan Moller, Okin. 1989. Gender, Justice and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Onuf. 2002. “Institutions, Intentions and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 28, 2: 211–228.Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 1954. “Politics and the English Language.” In George Orwell: A Collection of Essays. Garden City: Doubleday.
Osburn, C. Dixon, and Michelle M. Benecke. 1997. “Conduct Unbecoming: Second Annual Report on ‘Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue.’ ” In Wives and Warriors: Women and the Military in the US and Canada, ed. Weinstein, Laurie and White, Christie C.. Westport and London: Bergin and Garvey, 151–177.Google Scholar
Parker, Andrew, Russo, Mary, Sommer, Doris, and Yaeger, Patricia. 1992. Nationalisms and Sexualities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Passerini, Luisa, ed. 1992. Totalitarianism and Memory: International Yearbook of Oral History and Life Stories, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carole, Pateman. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Carole, Pateman. 1989. Feminism, Democracy and Political Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Michael, ed. 1997. A Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Ruth. 2004. “The Social is Political: Towards the Re-politicization of Feminist Analysis of the Global Economy.” International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6, 4: 603–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perks, Robert, and Thompson, Alistair, eds. 1998. The Oral History Reader. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 1990. “Whose Rights?: A Critique of the Givens.” Alternatives 15: 303–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. ed. 1992a. Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 1992b. “Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender, and International Relations.” Millennium 21, 2: 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 1993. Global Gender Issues. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 2003. A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy: Integrating Reproductive, Productive, and Virtual Economies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, and Sisson Runyan, Anne. 1993. Global Gender Issues. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, and Runyan, Anne Sisson. 1998. Global Gender Politics. Second ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, and Jacqui True. 1998. “New Times and New Conversations.” In The “Man” Question in International Relations, ed. Zalewski, Marysia, and Parpart, Jane. Boulder: Westview Press, 14–27.Google Scholar
Jan Jindy, Pettman. 1996. Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anne, Phillips. 1991. Engendering Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Phoenix, Ann. 1994. “Practising Feminist Research: The Intersection of Gender and ‘Race’ in the Research Process.” In Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective, ed. Maynard, Mary, and Purvis, June. London: Taylor and Francis, 49–71.Google Scholar
Véronique, Pin-Fat. 2000. “(Im)possible Universalism: Reading Human Rights in World Politics.” Review of International Studies 26, 4: 663–674.Google Scholar
Pin-Fat, Véronique, and Maria, Stern. 2005. “The Scripting of Private Jessica Lynch: Biopolitics, Gender and the ‘Feminisation’ of the US Military.” Alternatives: Local, Global, Political 30, 1: 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, , Dierdre Wendel-Blunt, Steven C., and Ho, Karl. 1997. “Global Patterns in the Achievement of Women's Human Rights to Equality.” Human Rights Quarterly 19, 4: 813–835.Google Scholar
Pollock, Griselda. 1992. “The Gaze and the Look: Women With Binoculars – A Question of Difference.” In Dealing With Degas: Representations of Women and the Politics of Vision, ed. Kendall, Richard and Pollock, Griselda. New York: Universe.Google Scholar
Porter, Marilyn, and Judd, Ellen. 1999. Feminists Doing Development: A Practical Critique. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bimal, Prasad. 2001. The Foundations of Muslim Nationalism. Dhaka: The University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard, and Reus-Smit, Christian. 1998. “Dangerous Liasions: The Constructivist-Critical Theory Debate in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 4, 3: 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elisabeth, Prügl. 1999. The Global Construction of Gender: Home-based Work in the Political Economy of the Twentieth Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Prügl, Elisabeth, and Meyer, Mary K., eds. 1999. Gender and Global Governance. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, Raj. 1992. “Nationalism, Gender, and the Narrative of Identity.” In Diasporic Mediations: Between Home and Location, ed. Radhakrishnan, Raj. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 185–202.Google Scholar
Rahman, Hasan Hafizur, ed. 1984. Bangaladesher Shadhinata Judhyo: Dililptro, vol. 8. Dhaka: Tothyo Montronaloy, Gonoprojatontri Bangaladesh Sharkar.Google Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Waylen, Georgiana, eds. 1998. Gender, Politics and the State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathgeber, Eva M. 1995. “Gender and Development in Action.” In Feminism/Postmodernism/Development, ed. Marchand, Marianne H., and Parpart, Jane L.. London: Routledge, 204–220.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. “The Law of Peoples.” In On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, ed. Shute, Stephen, and Hurley, Susan. New York: Basic Books, 41–82.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Razavi, S., Pearson, R., and Danloy, C., eds. 2004. Globalization, Export-Oriented Employment and Social Policy: Gendered Connections. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betty, Reardon. 1985. Sexism and the War System. New York: Teacher's College Press.Google Scholar
Betty, Reardon. 1993. Woman and Peace: Feminist Versions of Global Security. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Evelyn. [1970] 1984. “Women: Caste, Class, or Oppressed Sex?” In Feminist Frameworks: Alternative Theoretical Accounts of the Relations between Women and Men, ed. Jaggar, Alison M., and Rothenberg, Paula S.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 170–173.Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1993. “Neglected Voices and Excessive Demands in Feminist Research.” Qualitative Sociology 16, 1: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit, with Davidman, Lynn. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricks, Thomas. 1997. “The Widening Gap Between the Military and Society.” The Atlantic Monthly 280, 1: 66–78.Google Scholar
Risman, Barbara J. 1993. “Methodological Implications of Feminist Scholarship.” The American Sociologist 24, 3/4: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Sikkink, Kathryn, and Ropp, Stephen, eds. The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Robertson, Geoffrey. 1999. Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 1999. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 2003. “Human Rights and the Global Politics of Resistance: Feminist Perspectives.” Review of International Studies 29, special issue: 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1999. “Governing the Global Economy: Does One Architectural Style Fit All?Brookings Trade Forum, 1: 105–140.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2001. “Trading in Illusions.” Foreign Policy 123: 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N., ed. 1993. Global Voices: Dialogues in International Relations. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rowell, Margit. 1997. Objects of Desire: The Modern Still Life. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1990. “The Rationality of Care.” In Women, Militarism, and War, ed. Elshtain, J. B. and Tobias, S.. Savage: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rycenga, Jennife, ed. 2001. Frontline Feminisms: Women, War, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W.. [1978] 1994. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1991. “US Third World Feminism: The Theory and Method of Oppositional Consciousness in the Postmodern World.” Genders 10: 1–24.Google Scholar
Sangari, Kumkum, and Vaid, Sudesh. 1994. Women and Culture. Bombay: Research Centre for Women's Studies.Google Scholar
Sangster, Joan. 1998. “Telling our Stories: Feminist Debates and the Use of Oral History.” In The Oral History Reader, ed. Perks, Robert, and Thompson, Alistair. London: Routledge, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SCB Statistics. 2002. Statistics from the Swedish Central Bureau of Statistics. Available online at <http://www.scb.se>.
Schnall, David J. 1979. Radical Dissent in Contemporary Israeli Politics: Cracks in the Wall. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1992. Gender and the Politics of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seager, Joni. 2003. The Penguin Atlas of Women in the World Completely Revised and Updated: Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Security Dialogue, 2004. vol. 35, 3.
Seidman, Steven. 2001. “From Identity to Queer Politics: Shifts in Normative Heterosexuality.” In The New Social Theory Reader, Seidman, Steven and Alexander, Jeffrey. New York: Routledge: 353–360.Google Scholar
Seifert, Ruth. 1993. War Rape: Analytical Approaches. Geneva: Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, ed. 2002. Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1990a. “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts.” In Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, ed. Tinker, Irene. New York: Oxford University Press, 123–149.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya 1990b. “More than 100 Million Women Are Missing.” New York Review of Books 37: 61–66.Google Scholar
Sen, Gita, and Grown, Caren. 1987. Development, Crisis, and Alternative Visions: Third World Women's Perspectives. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Seu, Bruna I., and Heenan, Colleen M.. 1998. Feminism and Psychotherapy: Reflections on Contemporary Theories and Practices. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 2000. “Caring in the Third Way: The Relation between Obligation, Responsibility and Care in Third Way Discourse.” Critical Social Policy 20, 1: 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 2001. “South African Social Policy and the Ethic of Care.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August–September, 2001.
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 2003. “The Place of Care: The Relevance of the Feminist Ethic of Care for Social Policy.” Feminist Theory 4, 2: 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharoni, Simona. 1994. Gender and the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: The Politics of Women's Resistance. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Martin. 1994. Global Society and International Relations: Sociological Concepts and Political Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2000. “Restructuring World Politics: The Limits and Asymmetries of Soft Power.” In Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, ed. Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 301–318.Google Scholar
Runyan, Sission, Anne, , and Peterson, V. Spike. 1991. “The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversion of International Relations Theory.” Alternatives 16: 67–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E., 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E.. 1990a. Texts, Facts, and Femininty: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E.. 1990b. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E.. 1999. Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1997. “The Satanic Geographies of Globalization: Uneven Development in the 1990s,” Public Culture 10, 1:169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia, eds. 1996. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snider, Lauren. 2003. “Constituting the Punishable Woman.” British Journal of Criminology 43, 2: 354–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobhan, Salma. 1994. “National Identity, Fundamentalism and the Women's Movement in Bangladesh.” In Gender and National Identity: Women and Politics in Muslim Societies, ed. Moghadam, Valentine M.. London: Zed Books, 63–80.Google Scholar
Sommer, Doris. 1991. “Rigoberta's Secrets.” Latin American Perspectives 18, 3: 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOU 1965: 68. Värnplikten. Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet.
SOU 1977: 26. Kvinnan och Försvarets Yrken. Stockholm, Försvarsdepartementet.
SOU 1984: 63. Homosexuella och samhället. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
SOU 1984: 71. Värnplikten i Framtiden. Stockholm, Försvarsdepartementet.
SOU 1992: 139. Totalförsvarsplikt. Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet.
SOU 2000: 21. Totalförsvarsplikten. Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet.
Spelman, Elizabeth V., 1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakrabarty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Nelson, C., and Grossberg, L.. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 271–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivas, M. N., Shah, A. M., and Ramaswamy, E. A.. 1979. The Fieldworker and the Field: Problems and Challenges in Sociological Investigation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1988. “Can There be a Feminist Ethnography?Women's Studies International Forum 11, 1: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stack, Carol B. 1996. “Writing Ethnography: Feminist Critical Practice.” In Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, ed. Wolf, Diane L.. Boulder: Westview Press: 96–106.Google Scholar
Staeheli, Lynn, and Nagar, Richa. 2002. “Feminists Talking Across Worlds.” Gender, Place and Culture 9, 2: 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Liz, ed. 1990. Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stanley, Liz, and Sue Wise. 1990. “Method, Methodology and Epistemology in Feminist Research Processes.” In Feminist Praxis, ed. Stanley, Liz. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 20–60.Google Scholar
Stanley, Liz, and Wise, Sue. 1993. Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steans, Jill. 1997. Gender and International Relations: An Introduction. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Steans, Jill. 2003. “Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5, 3: 428–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Julie. 1989. “Feminist Fictions: A Critique of the Category ‘Non-Western Woman’ in Feminist Writings on India.” In Subaltern Studies, VI: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Guha, Ranajit, ed. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Carolyn M. 1988. “The Need for Alternative Forms of Security: Crises and Opportunities.” In Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance 13, 1: 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Daniel. 2004. The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Stern, Maria. 2001. Naming In/security – Constructing Identity: Mayan Women in Guatemala on the Eve of Peace. Göteborg: Padrigu Thesis Series.Google Scholar
Stern, Maria. 2002. “Doing Feminist International Relations: A Discussion on Methodology.” Paper presented at International Studies Association Annual Conference, New Orleans.
Stern, Maria. 2005. Naming Security – Constructing Identity: Mayan Women in Guatemala on the Eve of “Peace.”Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sternbach, Nancy, Navarro-Aranguren, Marysa, Chuchryk, Patricia, and Alvarez, Sonia E.. 1992. “Feminisms in Latin America: From Bogotá to San Bernardo.” Signs 17, 2: 393–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks, ed. 1983. Women and Men's Wars. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks. ed. 1996. It's Our Military Too! Women and the US Military. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks. 1999. “United Nations Peacekeeping: Men and Women's Work.” In Gender Politics and Global Governance, ed. Meyer, Mary K., and Prügl, Elizabeth. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 43–57.Google Scholar
Stienstra, Deborah. 1994. Women's Movements and International Organizations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stienstra, Deborah. 1994–5. “Can the Silence be Broken? Gender and Canadian Foreign Policy.” International JournalWinter: 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglmayar, Alexandra, ed. 1994. Mass Rape: The War against Women in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Lincoln, NE, and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, Banu. 2001. “Snow Brown and the Seven Detergents: A Metanarrative on Science and the Scientific Method.” In Women, Science and Technology, Wyer, Mary et al. London: Routledge, 36–41.Google Scholar
Suleri, Sara. 1992. The Rhetoric of English India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svedberg, Erika, and Annica Kronsell. 2003. “Feministisk metod, teori och forskning om identiteter.” In Identitetsstudier i praktiken, ed. Petersson, Bo, and Robertson, Alexa. Malmö: Liber, 53–69.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1987. “Some Dangers in Merging Feminist and Peace Perspectives.” Alternatives 12, 4: 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1992a. “Feminist Theory and Gender Studies in International Relations.” International Studies Notes 16/17, 3/1: 32–38.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1992b. “Feminists and Realists View Autonomy and Obligation in International Relations.” In Gendered States, ed. Peterson, V. Spike. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1994a. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1994b. “Empathetic Co-operation: A Feminist Method for IR.” Millennium 23, 3: 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1996a. “Picturing the Cold War: An Eye Graft/Art Graft.” Alternatives 21, 4: 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1996b. “The Contributions of Feminist Theory to International Relations.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, ed. Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 254–278.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1998. “Handmaids' Tales of Washington Power: The Abject and the Real Kennedy White House.” Body and Society 4, 3: 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1999. “(Sur)Real Internationalism: Emigrés, Native Sons, and Ethical War Creations.” Alternatives 24, 2: 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2001. “Art, Abstraction, and International Relations.” Millennium 30, 3: 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2002. Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2004. “Woe or Whoa! International Relations Where It's Not Supposed to Be.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 10, 2: 57–68.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1996. “A World Consensus on Human Rights?DissentSummer: 15–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1999. “Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, ed. Bauer, Joanne R., and Bell, Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 124–144.Google Scholar
Terriff, Terry, with Croft, Stuart, James, Lucy, and Morgan, Patrick M.. 1999. Security Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tessler, Mark, and Warriner, Ina. 1997. “Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey-data from the Middle East.” World Politics 49, 2: 250–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul. 1998. “The Voice of the Past: Oral History.” In The Oral History Reader, ed. Perks, Robert, and Thompson, Alistair. London: Routledge, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul.. 2000. The Voice of the Past: Oral History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1988. “Hans Morganthau's Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation.” Millennium 17, 3: 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1994. “A Feminist Critique of Political Realism.” In Women, Gender and World Politics: Perspectives, Policies and Prospects, ed. Beckman, Peter R., and D'Amico, Francine. Westport: Bergin and Garvey, 29–40.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1997. “You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists.” International Studies Quarterly 41, 4: 611–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1998. “Continuing the Conversation…” International Studies Quarterly 41, 4: 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1999. “Why Women Can't Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama.” International Studies Review 1, 3: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States AD 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tinker, Irene. 1999. “Nongovernmental Organizations: An Alternative Power Base for Women?” In Gender Politics in Global Governance, ed. Meyer, Mary K., and Prügl, Elisabeth. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield, 88–106.Google Scholar
Tong, Rosemarie. 1989. Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1996. “Concluding Methodological Reflections: Elitism and Democracy among the Sciences.” In Beyond Theory: Changing Organizations through Participation, ed. Toulmin, Stephen, and Gustavsen, Bjorn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan,. 1995. “Care as a Basis for Radical Political Judgment.” Hypatia 10, 2: 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui. 1999. “Expanding Markets and Marketing Gender: The Integration of the Post-socialist Czech Republic.” Review of International Political Economy 6, 3: 360–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2001. “Feminism.” In Theories of International Relations, Second Edition, ed. Burchill, Scott, and Linklater, Andrew, with Devetak, Richard, Paterson, Matthew, and True, Jacqui. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2002. “Engendering International Relations: What Difference Does Second Generation Feminism Make?” Department of International Relations Working Paper, RSPAS, Australian National University. Available online at <http://rspas.anu.edu.au/ir/working%20papers/02-1.pdf>.
True, Jacqui. 2003. Gender, Globalization, and Postsocialism: The Czech Republic after Communism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2004. “Engendering Social Transformations.” In Goff, P., and Dunn, K., eds. Identity in International Relations. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui, and Mintrom, Michael. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45, 1: 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1994. Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.
UNDP 1996. Human Development Report 1995. New York: Oxford University Press.
UNDP 1999. Human Development Report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
UNDP 2000. Human Development Report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations News Agency. 1999. “14 Women Foreign Ministers Seek to End to Human Trafficking.” October 15.
Creveld, Martin. 2001. Men, Women and War. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Venturi, Robert, Brown, Denise Scott, and Izenour, Steven. 1972. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Viola, Bill. 2003. “Sources.” In Bill Viola: The Passions, ed. Walsh, John. Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 223–255.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 2001. “Winners and Losers: By Invitation Robert Wade on Global Inequality.” The Economist, April 8, 1–5.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 2002. “Letter to Martin Wolf.” Prospect Magazine, January 22.
Wæver, Ole. 1995. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In Security and the Nation State, ed. Lipschutz, Ronnie and Crawford, Beverly. New York: Columbia University Press, 46–86. Also printed as Working Paper no. 5/1993, Centre for Peace and Conflict Research, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Wägnerud, Lena. 1999. Kvinnorepresenation: Makt och möjligheter i Sveriges riksdag. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Wahl, Anna, Holgerson, Charlotte, Höök, Pia, and Linghag, Sophie. 2001. Det ordanar sig: Teorier om organization och kön. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1998. Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J., 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J.. 1999. “Forum on the Transformation of Political Community.” Review of International Studies 25, 1: 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, Marguerite R., and Rycenga, Jennifer, eds. 2000. Frontline Feminisms: Women, War and Resistance. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1998. “Interview with Ken Waltz, Conducted by Fred Halliday and Justin Rosenberg.” Review of International Studies 24, 3: 371–386.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Revised ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wapner, Paul. 1996. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Waring, Marilyn. 1988. If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1994. “Good Girls, Bad Girls and Little Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane's Critique of Feminist International Relations.” Millennium 23, 2: 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 2001. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weeks, Kathi. 1998. Constituting Feminist Subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weibull, Louise. 2001. Tjejmönstring: Lyckad rekrytering eller lockad rekryt? Försvarshögskolan, L1, Serie F:18.
Weldes, Jutta, Laffey, Mark, Gusterson, Hugh, and Duvall, Raymond, eds. 1999. Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Laurel, Weldon. S.. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-national Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Laurel, Welson. S.. Forthcoming, 2006. “Inclusion, Solidarity and Social Movements: The Global Movement Against Gender Violence.” Perspectives on Politics. March.Google Scholar
Welton, Katherine. 1997. “Nancy Hartsock's Standpoint Theory: From Content to ‘Concrete Multiplicity.’ ” Women and Politics 18, 3: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1991. “Bridging the Theory/Meta-theory Gap in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17, 4: 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Kath. 2002. Gender in Real Time: Power and Transcience in a Visual Age. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Westwood, Sallie, and Radcliffe, Sarah. 1993. “Viva”: Women and Popular Protest in Latin America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Westwood, Sallie, and Radcliffe, Sarah. 1996. Remaking the Nation: Place, Identity and Politics in Latin America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, Stephen K., 2000. Sustaining Affirmation: The Strengths of Weak Ontology in Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whitebrooke, Marianne. 2001. Identity, Narrative and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Tony Larry, and Conaway, Mary Ellen, eds. 1986. Self, Sex and Gender in Cross-Cultural Fieldwork. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 1989a. “Gender and International Relations: Beyond the Interparadigm Debate.” Millennium 18, 2: 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 1989b. “Gender in the Inter-paradigm Debate.” Millennium 18, 2: 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 1994. Feminism and International Relations: Towards a Political Economy of Gender in Interstate and Non-governmental Institutions. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 1997. “Theory as Exclusion: Gender and International Political Economy.” In Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, ed. Stubbs, R., and Underhill, G.. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 2001. “The Practice, and Praxis, of Feminist Research in International Relations.” In Critical Theory and World Politics, ed. Jones, Richard Wyn. Boulder: Westview Press, 149–160.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice, Trust and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1991. The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Patrick, and Chrisman, Laura, eds. 1993. Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wolf, Diane L. 1996. “Situating Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork.” In Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, ed. Wolf, Diane L.. Boulder: Westview Press, 1–55.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric. 1969. “American Anthropologists and American Society.” In Concepts and Assumptions in Contemporary Anthropology, ed. Tyler, Stephen A.. Proceedings of the Southern Anthropological Society no. 3. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 3–11.Google Scholar
Women's Caucus for International Studies. 1998. New Agenda Recommendations: For Implementation by ISA. Formulated by the Women's Caucus for International Studies and submitted to the ISA Governing Council in March 1998. <http://www.isanet.org/wcis>.
Women's Environment and Development Organization. 1998. Mapping Progress: Assessing Implementation of the Beijing Platform 1998. New York: WEDO.
Young, Iris Marion. 1990a. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990b. “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” In Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda J.. New York: Routledge, 300–323.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Series in Political Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Youngs, Gillian. 1999. International Relations in a Global Age: A Conceptual Challenge. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Youngs, Gillian, Lisle, Debbie, and Zalewski, Marysia. 1999. “Three Readings of GI Jane.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1, 3: 476–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1994. “Identity Politics and Women's Ethnicity.” In Identity Politics and Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in an International Perspective, ed. Moghadam, Valentine M.. Boulder: Westview Press, 408–424.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira, and Anthias, Floya, eds. 1989. Woman–Nation–State. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1993a. “Feminist Theory and International Relations.” In From Cold War to Collapse: Theory and World Politics in the 1980s, ed. Bowker, Mike, and Brown, Robin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–144.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1993b. “Feminist Standpoint Theory Meets International Relations Theory.” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 17, 3: 13–32.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1994. “The Women/Women Question in International Relations.” Millennium 23, 2: 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1995. “Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?International Affairs 71, 2: 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1996. “ ‘All These Theories Yet the Bodies Keep Piling Up.’ Theories, Theorists, Theorising.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, eds. Ken, Booth and Zalewski, Marysia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 340–353.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1998a. “Introduction: From the ‘Woman’ Question to the ‘Man’ Question in International Relations.” In The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations, ed. Zalewski, Marysia, and Parpart, Jane. Boulder: Westview Press, 1–13.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1998b. “Where is Woman in International Relations? ‘To Return as a Woman and Be Heard’.” Millennium 27, 4: 847–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 2002. “Feminism and International Relations: An Exhausted Conversation?” In Critical Paradigms in International Studies, ed. Harvey, F., and Brecher, M.. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 2003. “‘Women's Troubles’ Again in IR.” Forum on Gender and International Relations in International Studies Review 5, 2: 291–294.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia, and Parpart, Jane L., eds. 1998. The “Man” Question in International Relations. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Zonabend, François. 1993. The Nuclear Peninsula. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zur, Judith N., 1998 Violent Memories: Mayan War Widows in Guatemala. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Brooke A. Ackerly, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, Maria Stern, Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden, Jacqui True, University of Auckland
  • Book: Feminist Methodologies for International Relations
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617690.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Brooke A. Ackerly, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, Maria Stern, Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden, Jacqui True, University of Auckland
  • Book: Feminist Methodologies for International Relations
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617690.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Brooke A. Ackerly, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, Maria Stern, Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden, Jacqui True, University of Auckland
  • Book: Feminist Methodologies for International Relations
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617690.017
Available formats
×