Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:33:46.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - CONCLUSION: FROM FAILED ATTEMPTS TO PERSISTENT RESISTANCE – UNDERSTANDING DIVERGENT MOVEMENT TRAJECTORIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Sharon Erickson Nepstad
Affiliation:
University of Southern Maine
Get access

Summary

Since 1980, Plowshares activists throughout the world have been breaking into military bases and weapons production sites to call for disarmament and the abolition of war. During this time, the world has changed dramatically. The first Plowshares action at General Electric occurred when the arms race was escalating and the rapid proliferation of nuclear weapons generated great public concern. Then the Berlin Wall fell, the Soviet Union collapsed, and the Cold War ended. Political leaders were signing disarmament agreements and peace appeared to be breaking out all over. The sense of international tranquility did not last long, however, as the al Qaeda attacks on September 11, 2001 – along with subsequent terrorist acts and the ensuing U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq – created a new set of hostile geopolitical dynamics. Bellicose attitudes and heightened security concerns constituted another shift in the political environment at the start of the twenty-first century.

Remarkably, these changing circumstances and fluctuating political conditions have not had a strong influence on the trajectories of the Plowshares movement. Its activists have organized under a variety of conditions – some favorable, some not. The U.S. movement has faced significant repression but has persisted steadily for decades, continuously drawing attention to the fact that nuclear weapons still exist and pose a threat to all humanity. Some of the international branches, such as the British, Dutch, and Swedish Plowshares movements, began mobilization efforts in the late 1980s and early 1990s when most other peace movements were on the decline due to the lack of political opportunities and the perceived belief that nuclear weapons were no longer a serious concern.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×