Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:44:20.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - From naïve hope to realistic conviction: DRGs in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2010

John Kimberly
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Gerard de Pouvourville
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Thomas d'Aunno
Affiliation:
INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Sweden, with about nine million inhabitants, has a decentralized public health care system. Three political and administrative levels – central government, county councils and local municipalities – are involved in financing, providing and evaluating health care activities. The central government has only a legislative supervisory role, while county councils and municipalities are responsible both for financing and providing health services (Figure 4.1). The county councils are entitled to collect direct income tax revenues as their major financial source, but they are also politically accountable through their directly elected political assemblies. The vast majority of Swedish hospitals are public, owned and financed by the county councils. Primary care settings are also financed by the county councils but they are both publicly and privately owned.

Swedish hospitals have traditionally been financed via global budgeting. This is due to the fact that Sweden has a tradition of publicly owned hospitals and that cost control has been an important issue. Moreover, before the introduction of DRGs, there was no accepted system in use to describe performance. The counties had poor knowledge of hospital activity and productivity. There was a great need to find ways to measure productivity.

In Sweden, DRGs have been used as a prospective payment system, to describe performance and increase the transparency of hospital activities, as an analyzing tool and to measure productivity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diderichsen, F., Varde, E., Whitehead, M. (1997). Resource Allocation to Health Authorities: The Quest for an Equitable Formula in Britain and Sweden. BMJ 315 (7112): 875–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asplund, K., Hulter Asberg, K., Norrving, B., Stegmayr, B., Terént, A., Wester, P. O. (2003). Riks-stroke – A Swedish National Quality Register for Stroke Care. Cerebrovasc Dis 15 Suppl. 1: 5–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Håkansson, I., Lundström, M., Stenevi, U., Ehinger, B. (2001). Data Reliability and Structure in the Swedish National Cataract Register. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79(5): 518–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderman, P. (2000). On the Validity of the Results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 71(296): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köster, M., Andersson, J., Carling, K., Rosén, M. (2003) [Mortality after Myocardial Infarction Has Decreased in Nearly all Swedish Counties during the 1990s. Greatest Improvement Seen in those Counties with the Worst Initial Results]. Lakartidningen 100(37): 2838–44.Google Scholar
Heurgren, M., Nilsson, H., Erlö, C., Sjöli, P. (2003) [What Does the Individual Patient Cost? CPP – the Cost Per Patient Method – Is the Answer]. Lakartidningen 100(42): 3312–5.Google Scholar
Quaye, R. K. (2001). Internal Market Systems in Sweden: Seven Years after the Stockholm Model. Eur J Public Health 11(4): 380–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charpentier, C., Samuelson, L. A. (1999) [Impact of a Health Care Reform – A Study of the Stockholm Model] Effekter av en sjukvårdsreform – En analys av Stockholmsmodellen. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus Förlag AB.
Serdén, L., Lindqvist, R., Rosén, M. (2003). Have DRG-based Prospective Payment Systems Influenced the Number of Secondary Diagnoses in Health Care Administrative Data?Health Policy 65(2): 101–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsberg, E. (2001). Do Financial Incentives Make a Difference? Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Lindqvist, R., Möller, T. R., Stenbeck, M., Diderichsen, F. (2002). Do Changes in Surgical Procedures for Breast Cancer have Consequences for Hospital Mean Length of Stay? A Study of Women Operated on for Breast Cancer in Sweden, 1980–95. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 18(3): 566–75.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, F. (1993). Market Reforms in Swedish Health Care: A Threat to or Salvation for the Universalistic Welfare State?International Journal of Health Services 23(1): 185–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×