Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T02:22:07.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Influence triggers and compliance: A discussion of the effects of power, motivation, resistance, and antecedents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Barbara Wisse
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

This chapter describes a framework for understanding target compliance. The framework draws from the leadership, influence, and motivation literatures to identify target-based influence triggers and the moderating variables that lead to target compliance. The chapter discusses the proposed relationships and provides directions for future research.

Introduction

The role of power and influence on individual behavior is a necessary consideration in the organizational behavior and organizational theory literatures (Barbuto 2000b; Pfeffer 1981). Looking only at an agent's behaviors in trying to enact behavioral change in targets is, in many ways, like looking only at the behaviors of a truck driver who encounters a deer in the road and has to decide how to avoid an accident. The driver may consider several options to prevent a collision: flash the high-beam headlights, sound the horn, apply the brakes, or turn out of the path of the deer. Each choice is derived entirely from the truck driver's perspective, and none of them usually work to prevent an accident. The optimum solution to avoiding an accident, however, lies in understanding the behaviors of the deer, which will freeze when bright lights shine in its eyes. When the headlights are turned off, the deer will unfreeze and react to the vibrations of the road and the sight and sound of the oncoming truck, thus fleeing from the truck and avoiding the accident.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, R. B. and Elmhorst, J. M. (2002) Communicating at work: Principles and practices for business and the professions, 7th edn, New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. and Mael, F. (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avolio, B. J. (1994) The “natural”: Some antecedents to transformational leadership. International Journal of Public Adminstration, 17 (9), 1559–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbuto, J. E. (2000a) Comparing leaders' ratings to targets' self-reported resistance to task directives: An extension of Chester Barnard's zones of indifference. Psychological Reports, 86 (2), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbuto, J. E. (2000b) Influence triggers: A framework for understanding follower compliance. Leadership Quarterly, 11 (3), 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbuto, J. E. (1997) Motivation and leadership: Towards a predictive model of leader influence behavior, Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barbuto, J. E., Cundall, S., and Fritz, S. M. (2005) Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11 (4), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbuto, J. E. and Scholl, R. W. (1999) Leader's motivation and perception of follower's motivation as predictors of leader's influence tactics used. Psychological Reports, 84, 1087–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbuto, J. E., and Scholl, R. W. (1998) Motivation sources inventory: Development and validation of new scales to measure an integrative taxonomy of motivation. Psychological Reports, 82, 1011–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. (1938) The functions of the executive, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Press.Google Scholar
Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R. N. (1987) Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, D. and Levitan, U. (1975) Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (6), 736–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, J. P. R. and Raven, B. (1959) Social bases of power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power, Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Grams, W. C. and Rogers, R. W. (1989) Power and personality: Effects of Machiavellianism, need for approval and motivation on use of influence tactics. The Journal of General Psychology, 117 (1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. and Schriesheim, C. A. (1989) Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. and Abrams, D. (1988) Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and processes, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooijberg, R. and DiTomaso, N. (1996) Leadership in and of demographically diverse organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 7 (1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, R. J., Shane, S. A., and Herold, D. M. (1996) Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegan, R. (1982) The evolving self, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, N., Beauvais, L., and Scholl, R. (1999) Work motivation: The incorporation of self-concept-based processes. Human Relations, 52, 969–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, R. G. and Maher, K. J. (1991) Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance, Boston, Mass.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in organizations, Boston, Mass.: Pitman.Google Scholar
Sherif, C. W. (1964) Social categorization as a function of latitude of acceptance and series range. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. A. (2005) Leadership in organizations, 6th edn, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×