Ackerman, Bruce, Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Adler, Matthew D., “Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148 (2000), pp. 1363–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aeschylus, , The Suppliants, trans. Burian, Peter (Princeton University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aeschylus, , The Oresteia, trans. Fagles, Robert (Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, “Safe Haven: Pragmatics and Prospects,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 35 (1994), pp. 71–9.Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, “The Meaning of ‘Persecution’ in U.S. Asylum Law” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 292–320.Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, Martin, David A., and Motomura, Hiroshi, Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy, 4th edn. (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998).Google Scholar

Alexander III, Sydenham B., “A Political Response to Crisis in the Immigration Courts,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 21 (2006), pp. 1–59.Google Scholar

American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States, vol. 1 (1789–1815) (Washington, DC: Gales and Seaton, 1832).

Anderson, Elizabeth S., Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H., “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148 (2000), pp. 1503–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anker, Deborah E., “Refugee Law, Gender, and the Human Rights Paradigm,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15 (2002), pp. 133–54.Google Scholar

Anker, Deborah E., “Refugee Status and Violence Against Women in the ‘Domestic’ Sphere: The Non-State Actor Question,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15 (2001), pp. 391–402.Google Scholar

Anker, Deborah E., and Posner, Michael H., “The Forty Year Crisis: A Legislative History of the Refugee Act of 1980,” San Diego Law Review, 19 (1981), pp. 9–89.Google Scholar

Anker, Deborah E., Fitzpatrick, Joan, and Shacknove, Andrew, “Crisis and Cure: A Reply to Hathaway/Neve and Schuck,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 11 (1998), pp. 295–310.Google Scholar

Anker, Deborah E., Gilbert, Lauren, and Kelly, Nancy, “Women Whose Governments are Unable or Unwilling to Provide Reasonable Protection from Domestic Violence May Qualify as Refugees under United States Asylum Law,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 11 (1997), pp. 709–45.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Origins of Totalitarianism (San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, 1973).Google Scholar

Bader-Zaar, Birgitta, “Foreigners and the Law in Austria” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Bailliet, Cecilia M., “Assessing Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello Within the Refugee Status Determination Process: Contemplations on Conscientious Objectors Seeking Asylum,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20 (2006), pp. 337–84.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, and Goodin, Robert, Free Movement (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, International Extradition: United States Law and Practice, 3rd edn. (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1996).Google Scholar

Bau, Ignatius, This Ground is Holy: Church Sanctuary and Central American Refugees (New York: Paulist Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Beccaria, Cesare, On Crimes and Punishments, trans. Paolucci, Henry (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963).Google Scholar

Beerbühl, Margrit Schulte, “British Nationality Policy as a Counter-Revolutionary Strategy During the Napoleonic Wars: The Emergence of Modern Naturalization Regulations” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 55–72.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, Transformations of Citizenship (Amsterdam: Koninklijke Van Gorcum, 2001).Google Scholar

Bhabha, Jacqueline, “Embodied Rights: Gender Persecution, State Sovereignty, and Refugees,” Public Culture, 9 (1996), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, Michael, “Immigration” in Frey, R. G. and Heath, Christopher Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003), pp. 224–37.Google Scholar

Blakesley, Christopher L., “The Practice of Extradition from Antiquity to Modern France and the United States: A Brief History,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 4 (1981), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar

Blay, Sam, and Zimmermann, Andreas, “Recent Changes in German Refugee Law: A Critical Assessment,” American Journal of International Law, 88 (1994), pp. 361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum, Carolyn Patty, “License to Kill: Asylum Law and the Principle of Legitimate Governmental Authority to ‘Investigate its Enemies,’” Willamette Law Review, 28 (1992), pp. 719–50.Google Scholar

Blum, Carolyn Patty, “Political Assumptions in Asylum Decision-Making: The Example of Refugees from Armed Conflict” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 282–91.Google Scholar

Bosswick, Wolfgang, “Development of Asylum Policy in Germany,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 13 (2000), pp. 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, and Preves, Sharon E., “National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws,” Law and Society Review, 34 (2000), pp. 703–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, Hedley, “The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations” in Bull, Hedleyet al. (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Butler, A. Hays, “The Growing Support for Universal Jurisdiction” in Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), pp. 67–76.Google Scholar

Caestecker, Frank, “The Transformation of Nineteenth-Century West European Expulsion Policy, 1880–1914” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 120–37.Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “Who Should Get In? The Ethics of Immigration Admissions,” Ethics and International Affairs, 17 (2003), pp. 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “The Philosopher and the Policymaker: Two Perspectives on the Ethics of Immigration with Special Attention to the Problem of Restricting Asylum” in Hailbronner, Kay, Martin, David A., and Motomura, Hiroshi (eds.), Immigration Admissions: The Search for Workable Policies in Germany and the United States (Providence, RI: Berghahn Books, 1997), pp. 3–50.Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” in Beiner, Ronald (ed.), Theorizing Citizenship (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995), pp. 229–53.Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “Refugees and the Limits of Obligation,” Public Affairs Quarterly, 6 (1992), pp. 31–44.Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H., “States and Refugees: A Normative Analysis” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 18–29.Google Scholar

Carlier, Jean-Yves, et al. (eds.), Who is a Refugee? (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997).

Chimni, B. S., “Globalization, Humanitarianism and the Erosion of Refugee Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 13 (2000), pp. 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chimni, B. S., “The Geopolitics of Refugee Studies: A View from the South,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 11 (1998), pp. 350–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleveland, Sarah H., “Norm Internalization and U.S. Economic Sanctions,” Yale Journal of International Law, 26 (2001), pp. 1–92.Google Scholar

Coke, Sir Edward, The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, 5th edn. (London: Streateret al., 1671).Google Scholar

Coke, Sir Edward, The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, (London: Flesher, 1644).Google Scholar

Cole, David, Enemy Aliens (New York: Free Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Coles, Gervase, “Approaching the Refugee Problem Today” in Loescher, Gil and Monahan, Laila, Refugees and International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 373–410.Google Scholar

Coles, Gervase, “The Human Rights Approach to the Solution of the Refugee Problem: A Theoretical and Practical Enquiry” in Nash, Alan E. (ed.), Human Rights and the Protection of Refugees under International Law (Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1988), pp. 195–222.Google Scholar

“Constitutional Watch: A Country-by-Country Update on Constitutional Politics in Eastern Europe and the ex-USSR – Hungary,” East European Constitutional Review, 10 (Spring/Summer 2001).

Copelon, Rhonda, “Recognizing the Egregious in the Everyday: Domestic Violence as Torture,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 25 (1994), pp. 291–367.Google Scholar

Coutin, Susan Bibler, The Culture of Protest: Religious Activism and the U.S. Sanctuary Movement (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Crittenden, Ann, Sanctuary: A Story of American Conscience and the Law in Collision (New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1988).Google Scholar

Davidson, Miriam, Convictions of the Heart: Jim Corbett and the Sanctuary Movement (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Edminster, Steven, “Recklessly Risking Lives: Restrictive Interpretations of ‘Agents of Persecution’ in Germany and France” in US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey, 1999 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 1999).Google Scholar

Euripides, , Four Tragedies, trans. and eds. Grene, David and Lattimore, Richard (University of Chicago Press, 1955).Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas, Citizens and Aliens: Foreigners and the Law in Britain and the German States 1789–1870 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2000).Google Scholar

Faron, Olivier, and Grange, Cyril, “Paris and its Foreigners in the Late Eighteenth Century” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel, “The Expressive Function of Punishment” in Feinberg, (ed.), Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton University Press, 1970), pp. 95–118.Google Scholar

Feldman, David, “Changes in Nineteenth-Century Immigration Controls” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, 52 (1998), pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Joan, “Temporary Protection of Refugees: Elements of a Formalized Regime,” American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000), pp. 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Joan, “Flight from Asylum: Trends Toward Temporary ‘Refuge’ and Local Responses to Forced Migrations,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 35 (1994), pp. 13–70.Google Scholar

Foster, Michelle, “Causation in Context: Interpreting the Nexus Clause in the Refugee Convention,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 23 (2002), pp. 265–340.Google Scholar

Fraher, Richard M., “The Theoretical Justification for the New Criminal Law of the High Middle Ages: ‘Rei Publicae Interest, Ne Crimina Remaneant Impunita,’ ” University of Illinois Law Review, 1984 (1984), pp. 577–95.Google Scholar

Gaius, , The Institutes of Gaius, trans. Zulueta, Francis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946).Google Scholar

Gibney, Mark, “The Divorce Between Refugee Determinations and Pursuit of Human Rights Objectives Through U.S. Foreign Policy: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation” in Tomasi, Lydio F. (ed.), In Defense of the Alien, vol. XVIII (New York: Center for Migration Studies, 1996), pp. 170–81.Google Scholar

Gibney, Mark and Stohl, Michael, “Human Rights and U.S. Refugee Policy” in Gibney, Mark (ed.), Open Borders? Closed Societies? The Ethical and Political Issues (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), pp. 151–83.Google Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., The Ethics and Politics of Asylum (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., “The State of Asylum: Democratization, Judicialization and Evolution of Refugee Policy in Europe,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 50, October 2001.

Gibney, Matthew J., “Asylum and the Principle of Proximity,” Ethics, Place, and Environment, 3 (2000), p. 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., “Between Control and Humanitarianism: Temporary Protection in Contemporary Europe,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 14 (Spring 2000), pp. 689–707.Google Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., “Kosovo and Beyond: Popular and Unpopular Refugees,” Forced Migration Review, 5 (September 1999), pp. 28–30.Google Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., “Liberal Democratic States and Responsibilities to Refugees,” American Political Science Review, 93 (1999), pp. 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., and Hansen, Randall, “Deportation and the Liberal State: the Forcible Return of Asylum Seekers and Unlawful Migrants in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 77, February 2003.

Gilbert, Geoff, “Rights, Legitimate Expectations, Needs and Responsibilities,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 10 (1998), pp. 349–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Pamela, “Anyplace but Home,” Cornell International Law Journal, 26 (1993), pp. 565–604.Google Scholar

Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York: Knopf, 1996).Google Scholar

Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek, “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,” Duke Law Journal, 54 (2004), pp. 621–703.Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, The Refugee in International Law, 2nd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

Grahl-Madsen, Atle, The Status of Refugees in International Law, 2 vols. (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1966, 1972).Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, Rights of War and Peace, trans. Campbell, A. C. (Westport, CT: Hyperion Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, trans. Kelsey, Francis W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar

Hansen, Randall, “Asylum Policy in the European Union,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 14 (2000), pp. 779–800.Google Scholar

Hathaway, James C., The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James C., “Can International Refugee Law Be Made Relevant Again?” in US Committee on Refugees, World Refugee Survey 1996 (Washington, DC: US Committee on Refugees, 1996), pp. 14–19.Google Scholar

Hathaway, James C., “New Directions to Avoid Hard Problems: The Distortion of the Palliative Role of Refugee Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 8 (1995), pp. 288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James C., “Reconceiving Refugee Law as Human Rights Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 4 (1991), pp. 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James C., Law of Refugee Status (Toronto: Butterworths, 1991).Google Scholar

Hathaway, James C. and Neve, R. Alexander, “Making International Refugee Law Relevant Again: A Proposal for Collectivized and Solution-Oriented Protection,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 10 (1997), pp. 115–211.Google Scholar

Healey, Sharon A., “The Trend Toward the Criminalization and Detention of Asylum Seekers,” Human Rights Brief, 12.1 (2004), p. 14.Google Scholar

Held, David, et al., Global Transformations (Stanford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Helton, Arthur C., The Price of Indifference (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helton, Arthur C., “Political Asylum Under the 1980 Refugee Act: An Unfulfilled Promise,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 17 (1984), pp. 243–64.Google Scholar

,Herodotus, The History, trans. Grene, David (University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Heyman, Michael G., “Redefining Refugee: A Proposal for Relief for the Victims of Civil Strife,” San Diego Law Review, 24 (1987), p. 449.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (New York: Penguin, 1977).Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, et al., Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: Supplemental Case Histories, 2nd edn., vol. 2 (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1990).Google Scholar

,Human Rights First, “Abandoning the Persecuted: Victims of Terrorism and Oppression Barred From Asylum” (New York: Human Rights First, 2006).Google Scholar

,Human Rights First, “In Liberty's Shadow: U.S. Detention of Asylum Seekers in the Era of Homeland Security” (New York: Human Rights First, 2004).Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

,International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 2001).Google Scholar

,International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, World Disasters Report 1996 (Dordrecht : Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).Google Scholar

Jacobson, David, Rights Across Borders (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Jaeger, Gilbert, “A Comment on the Distortion of the Palliative Role of Refugee Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 8 (1995), pp. 300–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Kevin R., “A ‘Hard Look’ at the Executive Branch's Asylum Decisions,” Utah Law Review, 1991 (1991), p. 289.Google Scholar

Joly, Daniele, “A New Asylum Regime in Europe” in Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 336–56.Google Scholar

Justinian, , Digest of Justinian, vol. 1, trans. Watson, Alan (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Justinian, , “Code of Justinian” in The Civil Law, trans. Scott, S. P. (Cincinnati, OH: Central Trust Co., 1932).Google Scholar

Kälin, Walter, “Non-State Agents of Persecution and the Inability of the State to Protect,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15 (2001), pp. 415–31.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Political Writings, trans. and ed. Hans, Reiss (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security” in Katzenstein, (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Kelly, Nancy, “Gender-Related Persecution: Assessing the Asylum Claims of Women,” Cornell International Law Journal, 26 (1993), pp. 625–74.Google Scholar

Kerwin, Donald, “Revisiting the Need for Appointed Counsel,” mpi Insight (Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute, April 2005), pp. 12–16.Google Scholar

Khan, Rex D., “Why Refugee Status Should Be Beyond Judicial Review,” University of San Francisco Law Review, 35 (2000), pp. 57–81.Google Scholar

Kirchheimer, Otto, Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends (Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Knight, W. S. M., The Life and Works of Hugo Grotius (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1925).Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, “Reflections on Refoulement and Haitian Centers Council,” Harvard International Law Journal, 35 (1994), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., “Sovereignty, Regimes, and Human Rights” in Rittberger, Volker (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Lambert, Helene, “The Conceptualisation of ‘Persecution’ by the House of Lords: Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 13 (2001), pp. 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legomsky, Stephen H., “Learning to Live With Unequal Justice: Asylum and the Limits to Consistency,” Stanford Law Review, 60 (2007), pp. 444–57.Google Scholar

Legomsky, Stephen H., “Political Asylum and the Theory of Judicial Review,” Minnesota Law Review, 73 (1989), pp. 1205–16.Google Scholar

Loescher, Gil, Beyond Charity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Loescher, Gil and Scanlan, John A., Calculated Kindness (New York: Free Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Macklin, Audrey, “Cross-Border Shopping for Ideas: A Critical Review of United States, Canadian, and Australian Approaches to Gender-Related Asylum Claims,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 13 (1998), pp. 25–71.Google Scholar

Marrus, Michael, The Unwanted (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Martin, David A., “Two Cheers for Expedited Removal in the New Immigration Laws,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 40 (2000), pp. 673–704.Google Scholar

Martin, David A., “The Refugee Concept: On Definitions, Politics, and the Careful Use of a Scarce Resource” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 30–51.Google Scholar

Martin, David A., “Reforming Asylum Adjudication: On Navigating the Coast of Bohemia,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 138 (1990), pp. 1247–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Susan, Schoenholtz, Andy, and Waller, Deborah Meyers, “Temporary Protection: Towards a New Regional and Domestic Framework,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 12 (1998), pp. 543–87.Google Scholar

Marx, Reinhard, “The Notion of Persecution by Non-State Agents in German Jurisprudence,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15 (2001), pp. 447–61.Google Scholar

Meissner, Doris, “Reflections on the U.S. Refugee Act of 1980” in Martin, David A. (ed.), The New Asylum Seekers: Refugee Law in the 1980s (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1988).Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., “Parsing ‘A Right to Have Rights,’” Constellations, 3 (1996), pp. 200–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, David, On Nationality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Moore, Jennifer, “Whither the Accountability Theory,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 13 (2001), pp. 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Jennifer, “From Nation State to Failed State: International Protection from Human Rights Abuses by Non-State Agents,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 31 (1999), pp. 81–121.Google Scholar

Morawetz, Nancy, “Understanding the Impact of the 1996 Deportation Laws and the Limited Scope of Proposed Reforms,” Harvard Law Review, 113 (2000), pp. 1936–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, John, and Crosland, Beth, “The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European Asylum Policy?,” UNCHR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 39, 2001.

Musalo, Karen, Moore, Jennifer, and Boswell, Richard A. (eds.), Refugee Law and Policy: A Comparative and International Approach, 2nd edn. (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2002).

Musalo, Karen and Knight, Stephen, “Steps Forward and Steps Back: Uneven Progress in the Law of Social Group and Gender-Based Claims in the United States,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 13 (2001), pp. 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report (July 2004).

Newland, Kathleen, “The Impact of U.S. Refugee Policies on U.S. Foreign Policy: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog?” in Teitelbaum, Michael S. and Weiner, Myron (eds.), Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders (New York: W.W. Norton, 1995), pp. 190–214.Google Scholar

Noll, Gregor, “Rejected asylum seekers: the problem of return,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 4, May 1999.

Note, “Political Legitimacy in the Law of Political Asylum,” Harvard Law Review, 99 (1985), pp. 450–70.CrossRef

Ogletree, Jr., Charles J., “America's Schizophrenic Immigration Policy: Race, Class, and Reason,” Boston College Law Review, 41 (2000), pp. 755–70.Google Scholar

O'Higgins, Paul, “The History of Extradition in British Practice, 1174–1794,” Indian Year Book of International Affairs, Part II (1964), pp. 78–115.Google Scholar

Palmer, John R. B., Yale-Loehr, Stephen W., and Cronin, Elizabeth, “Why Are So Many People Challenging Board of Immigration Appeals Decisions in Federal Court? An Empirical Analysis of the Recent Surge in Petitions for Review,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20 (2005), pp. 1–99.Google Scholar

Parry, Clive (ed.), British Digest of International Law, Part VI (London: Stevens and Sons, 1965).

Pfeiffer, Neal P., Note, “Credibility Findings in INS Asylum Adjudications: A Realistic Assessment,” Texas Journal of International Law, 23 (1988), pp. 139–151.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman, The International Law and Custom of Ancient Greece and Rome, vol. 1 [1911], reprint (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein, 2001).Google Scholar

Pistone, Michele R., and Hoeffner, John J., “Rules Are Made to Be Broken: How the Process of Expedited Removal Fails Asylum Seekers,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20 (2006), pp. 167–211.Google Scholar

Pistone, Michele R., and Schrag, Philip G., “The New Asylum: Improved But Still Unfair,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 16 (2001), pp. 1–79.Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, “Migration and Poverty,” in Bader, Veit (ed.), Citizenship and Exclusion (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997), pp. 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, Bernard, The Refugee Question in Mid-Victorian Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Preston, Richard K., “Asylum Adjudications: Do State Department Advisory Opinions Violate Refugees' Rights and U.S. International Obligations?,” Maryland Law Review, 45 (1986), pp. 91–140.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, trans. Oldfather, C. H. and Oldfather, W. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar

Pyle, Christopher H., Extradition, Politics, and Human Rights (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ramanthan, Erik D., “Queer Cases: A Comparative Analysis of Global Sexual Orientation-Based Asylum Jurisprudence,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 11 (1996), pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, Schoenholtz, Andrew I., and Schrag, Philip G., “Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication,” Stanford Law Review, 60 (2007), pp. 295–411.Google Scholar

Randolph, Thomas Jefferson (ed.), Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies from the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, 2nd edn., vol. 3 (Boston, MA: Gray and Bowen, 1830).

Rawls, John, Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rieff, David, A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002).Google Scholar

Rigsby, Kent J., Asylia: Territorial Inviolability in the Hellenistic World (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas P., Ropp, Steven C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Adam, “More Refugees, Less Asylum,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 11 (1998), pp. 375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Lory Diana, “The Courts and Interception: The United States' Interdiction Experience and its Impact on Refugees and Asylum Seekers,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 17 (2003), pp. 199–219.Google Scholar

Schuck, Peter H., “Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal” in Schuck, (ed.), Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998), pp. 282–325.Google Scholar

Schuck, Peter H., “The Devaluation of American Citizenship” in Schuck, (ed.), Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998), pp. 163–75.Google Scholar

Schumacher, Rob W. M., “Three Related Sanctuaries of Poseidon: Geraistos, Kalaureia and Tainaron” in Marinatos, Nanno and Hägg, Robin (eds.), Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 62–87.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Shacknove, Andrew, “From Asylum to Containment,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 5 (1993), pp. 516–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shacknove, Andrew, “Who is a Refugee?,” Ethics, 95 (1985), pp. 274–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shklar, Judith N., American Citizenship (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Karl Blaine, “Sanctuary Law: Changing Conceptions of Wrongdoing and Punishment in Medieval European Law,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California-Berkeley, 2001.

Sibley, N. W., and Elias, Alfred, The Aliens Act and the Right of Asylum (London: Williams Clowes, 1906).Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, and Singer, Renata, “The Ethics of Refugee Policy” in Gibney, Mark (ed.), Open Borders? Closed Societies? The Ethical and Political Issues (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), pp. 111–30.Google Scholar

Sinha, S. Prakash, Asylum and International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinn, Ulrich, “Greek Sanctuaries as Places of Refuge” in Marinatos, Nanno and Hägg, Robin (eds.), Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 88–109.Google Scholar

Skran, Claudena M., Refugees in Inter-War Europe: The Emergence of a Regime (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skulan, Catherine, “Australia's Mandatory Detention of ‘Unauthorized’ Asylum Seekers: History, Politics and Analysis Under International Law,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 21 (2006), pp. 61–110.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “Defining the Limits: Universal Jurisdiction and National Courts” in Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), pp. 168–90.Google Scholar

Sophocles, , Three Theban Plays, trans. Fagles, Robert (New York: Penguin Books, 1982).Google Scholar

Soysal, Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship (University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar

State Papers and Publick Documents of the United States: 1789–96, vol. 1 (Boston: T. B. Wait, 1815).

Steinbock, Bonnie, and Norcross, Alastair (eds.), Killing and Letting Die, 2nd edn. (New York: Fordham University Press, 1994).

Steinbock, Daniel J., “Interpreting the Refugee Definition,” UCLA Law Review, 45 (1998), p. 794.Google Scholar

Stephens, Sir James Fitzjames, History of the Criminal Law of England, vol. 2 (London: Macmillan, 1883).Google Scholar

Storey, Hugo, and Wallace, Rebecca, “War and Peace in Refugee Law Jurisprudence,” American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001), pp. 349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suhrke, Astri, “Global Refugee Movements and Strategies of Response” in Kritz, Mary M. (ed.), U.S. Immigration and Refugee Policy: Global and Domestic Issues (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1983), pp. 157–73.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., “On the Expressive Function of Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144 (1996), pp. 2021–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sztucki, Jerzy, “Who is a Refugee? The Convention Definition: Universal or Obsolete?” in Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities(Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 44–80.Google Scholar

Tacitus, , Historical Works, Vol. 1: The Annals, trans. Murphy, Arthur (London: J. M. Dent, 1908).Google Scholar

Tacitus, , The Annals, trans. Bohn, Henry G. as The Works of Tacitus: The Annals, vol. 1, Oxford, 1854.Google Scholar

Tamir, Yael, Liberal Nationalism (Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

“The Expedited Removal Study: Report on the First Three Years of Implementation of Expedited Removal,” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 15 (2001), pp. 1–155.

Thucydides, , History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. Warner, Rex (New York: Penguin Books, 1972).Google Scholar

Tomsho, Robert, The American Sanctuary Movement (Austin, TX: Texas Monthly Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard, Rights of War and Peace (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Tuitt, Patricia, “Rethinking the Refugee Concept” in Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 106–17.Google Scholar

Tumlin, Karen C., “Suspect First: How Terrorism Policy is Reshaping Immigration Policy,” California Law Review, 92 (2000), pp. 1173–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twomey, Patrick, “Europe's Other Market: Trafficking in People,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 2 (2000), pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2005 (Geneva: UNHCR, April 2007).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, State of the World's Refugees 2006: Human Displacement in the New Millennium (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2001 (Geneva: UNHCR, 2002).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, The State of the World's Refugees: Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, The State of the World's Refugees 1997–8: A Humanitarian Agenda (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, “Note on International Protection,” A/AC/96/830 (September 7, 1994).

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1, Geneva, 1992.Google Scholar

,US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, World Refugee Survey 2007 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, 2007).Google Scholar

,US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, World Refugee Survey 2005 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, 2005).Google Scholar

,US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2003 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 2003).Google Scholar

,US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2002 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 2002).Google Scholar

,US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2001 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 2001).Google Scholar

,US Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review, FY 2006 Statistical Year Book (February 2007).

,US Immigration and Naturalization Service, Asylum Adjudications: An Evolving Concept and Responsibility for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (June and December, 1982).

Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law, trans. Fenwick, Charles G. (Geneva: Slatkine Reprints – Henry Dunant Institute, 1983).Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, “Europe's Response to the Arrival of Asylum Seekers: Refugee Protection and Immigration Control,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 6, May 1999.

Vermeulen, Ben, et al., “Persecution by Third Parties,” Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands, Nijmegen, May 1998.

“Veto Message, January 28, 1915,” Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 18 (New York: Bureau of National Literature, 1917), p. 8043.

Sternberg, Mark R., “The Plight of the Non-Combatant in Civil War and the New Criteria for Refugee Status,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 9 (1997), pp. 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, “The Distribution of Membership” in Brown, Peter G. and Shue, Henry (eds.), Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1981).Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977).Google Scholar

Weidlich, Sabine, “First Instance Asylum Proceedings in Europe: Do Bona Fide Refugees Find Protection?,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 14 (2000), pp. 643–72.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, 20 (1995), pp. 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review, 88 (1994), pp. 384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wijngaert, Christine, The Political Offence Exception to Extradition (Boston, MA: Kluwer-Deventer, 1980).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian, Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum, trans. Drake, Joseph H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar

Yarnold, Barbara M., Refugees Without Refuge: Formation and Failed Implementation of U.S. Political Asylum Policy in the 1980s (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1990).Google Scholar

Zolberg, Aristide R., A Nation By Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Zolberg, Aristide R., Suhrke, Astri, and Aguayo, Sergio, Escape From Violence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Zucker, Norman and Zucker, Naomi Flink, Desperate Crossings (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996).Google Scholar

Aguilar-Solis v. INS, 168 F.3d 565 (1st Cir. 1999).

American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D. Cal. 1991).

Baballah v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2004).

Baballah v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2003).

Baka v. INS, 963 F.2d 1376 (10th Cir. 1992).

Barrraza Rivera v. INS, 913 F.2d 1443 (9th Cir. 1990).

Begzatowski v. INS, 278 F.3d 665 (7th Cir. 2002).

Benslimane v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2005).

Canas-Segovia v. INS, 970 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1992).

Canas-Segovia v. INS, 902 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1990).

Castaneda-Castillo v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2007) (en banc).

Chanco v. INS, 82 F.3d 298 (9th Cir. 1996).

DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989).

Desir v. Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723 (9th Cir. 1988).

Diallo v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2004).

Dwomoh v. Sava, 696 F. Supp. 970 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

Elias-Zacarias v. INS, 502 U.S. 478 (1992).

Elien v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2004).

Escobar v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 363 (3d Cir. 2005).

Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233 (3rd Cir. 1993).

Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).

Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Foroglou v. INS, 170 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 1999).

Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425 (9th Cir. 1995).

Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 345 F.3d 824 (9th Cir. 2003).

Hernandez-Ortiz v. INS, 777 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1985).

Iao v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2005).

In re Estate of Marcos Human Rights Litig., 978 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1992).

INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415 (1999).

INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987).

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314 (1992).

Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).

Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995).

Kaveh-Haghigy v. INS, 783 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1986).

Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102 (9th Cir. 1969).

Lazo-Majano v. INS, 813 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir. 1987).

Li v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).

Li v. Ashcroft, 312 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2002).

M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304 (4th Cir. 1990).

Maldonado-Cruz v. U.S. I.N.S., 883 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1989).

Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976).

Matter of Doherty, 599 F. Supp. 270 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).

Mikhailevitch v. INS, 146 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 1998).

Mitev v. INS, 67 F.3d 1325 (7th Cir. 1995).

Osaghae v. INS, 942 F.2d 1160 (7th Cir. 1991).

Perlera-Escobar v. Executive Office for Immigration, 894 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1990).

Pitcherskaia v. INS, 118 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 1997).

Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336 (9th Cir. 1995).

Safaie v. INS, 25 F.3d 636 (8th Cir. 1994).

Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, 509 U.S. 155 (1993).

Schoenmetz v. Ingham, 949 F. Supp. 152 (W.D.N.Y. 1996).

Singh v. Ilchert, 801 F. Supp. 313 (N.D. Cal. 1992).

Skalak v. INS, 944 F.2d 364 (7th Cir. 1991).

Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004).

Tachiona v. Mugabe, 234 F. Supp. 2d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).

Town of Castle Rock, Colo. v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005).

Ucelo-Gomez v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2006).

Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney General, 502 F.3d 285 (3d Cir. 2007).

Wang v. Attorney General, 423 F.3d 260 (3d Cir. 2005).

Xuncax v. Gramajo, 886 F. Supp. 162 (D. Mass. 1995).

Yadegar-Sargis v. INS, 297 F.3d 596 (7th Cir. 2002).

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2006).

In re H –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 337 (BIA 1996).

In re R – A –, 22 I. & N. Dec. 906 (BIA 1999).

In re S – P –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 486 (BIA 1996).

Matter of A – G –, 19 I. & N. Dec. 502 (BIA 1987).

Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 211 (BIA 1985).

Matter of B –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 66 (BIA 1995).

Matter of Chang, 20 I. & N. Dec. 38 (BIA 1989).

Matter of Chen, 20 I. & N. Dec. 16 (BIA 1989).

Matter of Izatula, 20 I. & N. Dec. 149 (BIA 1990).

Matter of Kasinga, 21 I. & N. 357 (BIA 1996).

Matter of Maldonado-Cruz, 19 I. & N. Dec. 509 (BIA 1988).

Matter of R –, 20 I. & N. Dec. 621 (BIA 1992).

Matter of Rodriguez-Majano, 19 I & N Dec. 811 (BIA 1988).

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Abdi [1999] 162 A.L.R. 105 (Fed. Ct. Aust.).

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Khawar [2002] H.C.A. 14.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward [1993] S.C.R. 689.

Cheung v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1993] 102 D.L.R. (4th) 214 (Fed. Ct. App.).

Hinzman v. Canada [2007] F.C.A. 171.

Hinzman v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration [2006] F.C. 420.

Isa v. Secretary of State (Canada) [1995] 28 Imm. L.R. (2d) 68 (Fed. Ct.).

MCI v. Jessica Robyn Dolamore [2001] F.T.C. 421.

Salibian v. Canada [1990] 3 F.C. 250.

A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ. 175 (CA).

Adan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1999] 1 A.C. 293.

Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 A.C. 489.

In re Meunier [1894] 2 Q.B. 415.

R. (Limbuela) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] Q.B. 1440.

R. v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and another, ex parte Shah [1999] 2 A.C. 629.

Refugee Appeal No. 71462/99 (September 27, 1999).

Refugee Appeal No. 71427/99, [2000] N.Z.A.R. 545 (August 16, 2000).

Refugee Appeal No. 74665/03 (July 7, 2004).

Aguilar-Solis v. INS, 168 F.3d 565 (1st Cir. 1999).

American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D. Cal. 1991).

Baballah v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2004).

Baballah v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2003).

Baka v. INS, 963 F.2d 1376 (10th Cir. 1992).

Barrraza Rivera v. INS, 913 F.2d 1443 (9th Cir. 1990).

Begzatowski v. INS, 278 F.3d 665 (7th Cir. 2002).

Benslimane v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2005).

Canas-Segovia v. INS, 970 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1992).

Canas-Segovia v. INS, 902 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1990).

Castaneda-Castillo v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2007) (en banc).

Chanco v. INS, 82 F.3d 298 (9th Cir. 1996).

DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989).

Desir v. Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723 (9th Cir. 1988).

Diallo v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2004).

Dwomoh v. Sava, 696 F. Supp. 970 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

Elias-Zacarias v. INS, 502 U.S. 478 (1992).

Elien v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2004).

Escobar v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 363 (3d Cir. 2005).

Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233 (3rd Cir. 1993).

Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).

Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Foroglou v. INS, 170 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 1999).

Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425 (9th Cir. 1995).

Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 345 F.3d 824 (9th Cir. 2003).

Hernandez-Ortiz v. INS, 777 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1985).

Iao v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2005).

In re Estate of Marcos Human Rights Litig., 978 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1992).

INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415 (1999).

INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987).

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314 (1992).

Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).

Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995).

Kaveh-Haghigy v. INS, 783 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1986).

Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102 (9th Cir. 1969).

Lazo-Majano v. INS, 813 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir. 1987).

Li v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).

Li v. Ashcroft, 312 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2002).

M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304 (4th Cir. 1990).

Maldonado-Cruz v. U.S. I.N.S., 883 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1989).

Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976).

Matter of Doherty, 599 F. Supp. 270 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).

Mikhailevitch v. INS, 146 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 1998).

Mitev v. INS, 67 F.3d 1325 (7th Cir. 1995).

Osaghae v. INS, 942 F.2d 1160 (7th Cir. 1991).

Perlera-Escobar v. Executive Office for Immigration, 894 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1990).

Pitcherskaia v. INS, 118 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 1997).

Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336 (9th Cir. 1995).

Safaie v. INS, 25 F.3d 636 (8th Cir. 1994).

Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, 509 U.S. 155 (1993).

Schoenmetz v. Ingham, 949 F. Supp. 152 (W.D.N.Y. 1996).

Singh v. Ilchert, 801 F. Supp. 313 (N.D. Cal. 1992).

Skalak v. INS, 944 F.2d 364 (7th Cir. 1991).

Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004).

Tachiona v. Mugabe, 234 F. Supp. 2d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).

Town of Castle Rock, Colo. v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005).

Ucelo-Gomez v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2006).

Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney General, 502 F.3d 285 (3d Cir. 2007).

Wang v. Attorney General, 423 F.3d 260 (3d Cir. 2005).

Xuncax v. Gramajo, 886 F. Supp. 162 (D. Mass. 1995).

Yadegar-Sargis v. INS, 297 F.3d 596 (7th Cir. 2002).

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2006).

In re H –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 337 (BIA 1996).

In re R – A –, 22 I. & N. Dec. 906 (BIA 1999).

In re S – P –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 486 (BIA 1996).

Matter of A – G –, 19 I. & N. Dec. 502 (BIA 1987).

Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 211 (BIA 1985).

Matter of B –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 66 (BIA 1995).

Matter of Chang, 20 I. & N. Dec. 38 (BIA 1989).

Matter of Chen, 20 I. & N. Dec. 16 (BIA 1989).

Matter of Izatula, 20 I. & N. Dec. 149 (BIA 1990).

Matter of Kasinga, 21 I. & N. 357 (BIA 1996).

Matter of Maldonado-Cruz, 19 I. & N. Dec. 509 (BIA 1988).

Matter of R –, 20 I. & N. Dec. 621 (BIA 1992).

Matter of Rodriguez-Majano, 19 I & N Dec. 811 (BIA 1988).

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Abdi [1999] 162 A.L.R. 105 (Fed. Ct. Aust.).

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Khawar [2002] H.C.A. 14.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward [1993] S.C.R. 689.

Cheung v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1993] 102 D.L.R. (4th) 214 (Fed. Ct. App.).

Hinzman v. Canada [2007] F.C.A. 171.

Hinzman v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration [2006] F.C. 420.

Isa v. Secretary of State (Canada) [1995] 28 Imm. L.R. (2d) 68 (Fed. Ct.).

MCI v. Jessica Robyn Dolamore [2001] F.T.C. 421.

Salibian v. Canada [1990] 3 F.C. 250.

A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ. 175 (CA).

Adan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1999] 1 A.C. 293.

Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 A.C. 489.

In re Meunier [1894] 2 Q.B. 415.

R. (Limbuela) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] Q.B. 1440.

R. v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and another, ex parte Shah [1999] 2 A.C. 629.

Refugee Appeal No. 71462/99 (September 27, 1999).

Refugee Appeal No. 71427/99, [2000] N.Z.A.R. 545 (August 16, 2000).

Refugee Appeal No. 74665/03 (July 7, 2004).