Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:43:50.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The Literary Genius of William Shakespeare: Empirical Studies of His Dramatic and Poetic Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

Scott Barry Kaufman
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

The psychology of creative writing can be approached numerous ways, but among the most direct is to scrutinize the creativity of the single most outstanding exemplar of the phenomenon. In the case of English literature that exemplar's identity leaves little no room for doubt. The appropriate author is the person known as William Shakespeare, a writer long considered the greatest playwright and poet in the English language. So prominent and durable was his influence that modern English is very much a repository of the hundreds of words and expressions that the Bard himself devised (Macrone, 1990). For instance, he enlarged the lexicon with the verbs “blanket,” “champion,” “gossip,” “misquote,” “puke,” “swagger,” and “torture”; the nouns “eyeball,” “mountaineer,” and “pageantry”; and the adjectives “bloodstained,” “domineering,” “fashionable,” “majestic,” and “unreal.” And Shakespeare coined such durable expressions as “in my mind's eye,” “all the world's a stage,” “full circle,” “good riddance,” “in my heart of hearts,” “to thine own self be true,” “heart on my sleeve,” “hob nob,” “an itching palm,” “caviar to the general,” “the dogs of war,” “eaten me out of house and home,” “a dish fit for the gods,” “fair play,” “for goodness' sake,” “foregone conclusion,” “household words,” “a lean and hungry look,” “the milk of human kindness,” “one fell swoop,” “to the manner born,” “the primrose path,” “short shrift,” “too much of a good thing,” “what the dickens,” “neither rhyme nor reason,” “neither a borrower nor a lender be,” “more in sorrow than in anger,” “brevity is the soul of wit,” “brave new world,” “bated breath,” “uneasy lies the head that wears a crown,” “what's past is prologue,” “a tower of strength,” “a spotless reputation,” “laugh oneself into stitches,” “knock, knock! Who's there?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.Google Scholar
Craig, H., & Bevington, D. (Eds.). (1973). The complete works of Shakespeare (rev. ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derks, P. L. (1989). Pun frequency and popularity of Shakespeare's plays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derks, P. L. (1994). Clockwork Shakespeare: The Bard meets the Regressive Imagery Dictionary. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, W. E. Y., & Valenza, R. J. (2000). Can the Oxford candidacy be saved? A response to W. Ron Hess: “Shakespeare's dates: The effect on stylistic analysis.”The Oxfordian, 3, 71–97.Google Scholar
Emrich, C. G., Brower, H. H., Feldman, J. M., & Garland, H. (2001). Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 527–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. A. (Ed.). (1965). Gems of Chinese literature. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1923)
Hart, M. H. (1987). The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Kammann, R. (1966). Verbal complexity and preferences in poetry. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 536–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Macrone, M. (1990). Brush up your Shakespeare!New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1975). Romantic progression: The psychology of literary history. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Quételet, A. (1968). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. New York: Franklin. (Reprint of 1842 Edinburgh translation of 1835 French original)Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1983). Dramatic greatness and content: A quantitative study of eighty-one Athenian and Shakespearean plays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Popularity, content, and context in 37 Shakespeare plays. Poetics, 15, 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1989). Shakespeare's sonnets: A case of and for single-case historiometry. Journal of Personality, 57, 695–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 251–264.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Imagery, style, and content in 37 Shakespeare plays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). William Shakespeare. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 559–563). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Thematic content and political context in Shakespeare's dramatic output, with implications for authorship and chronology controversies. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creative life cycles in literature: Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists?Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(3), 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K., Taylor, K., & Cassandro, V. (1998). The creative genius of William Shakespeare: Historiometric analyses of his plays and sonnets. In Steptoe, A. (Ed.), Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament in the historical record (pp. 167–192). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (1974). Sonnets. In Evans, G. B. (Ed.), The Riverside Shakespeare (pp. 1745–1748). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×