Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:29:02.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The subjunctive mood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Geoffrey Leech
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Marianne Hundt
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Christian Mair
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Nicholas Smith
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The analytic part of this book begins with a series of studies of major verb categories: modality, aspect and voice. As part of this, the present chapter will investigate recent changes in the use of the subjunctive mood, an inflectional category of the verb. Semantically, the subjunctive mood is closely related to the modal auxiliaries, which will be the topic of the following chapter. Just like some modal auxiliaries, the subjunctive in English can be used to express obligation or necessity (he demands that the evidence be/must be/should be demolished). In if-clauses it can express ‘irrealis’, similar to the use of such modals as could and might.

These semantically interrelated verbal categories, mood and modal auxiliaries, have been much studied both synchronically and diachronically. The demise of the subjunctive is one of the reiterated putative changes in English – both in terms of long-term developments and ongoing change in PDE. Bevier (1931: 207) calls the subjunctive a ‘disappearing feature of the English language’; Foster (1968: 220) remarks that ‘the subjunctive mood of the verb is a rather feeble and restricted device in modern English’ and Harsh (1968: 98), on the basis of his textual evidence, concludes that the ‘inflected subjunctive forms decline to the point of non-existence in present-day English’. Towards the end of the twentieth century, Givón (1993: 274) points out that ‘the old grammatical category of subjunctive has almost disappeared’, and according to Peters' most recent comment (2004: 520), the ‘subjunctive is a pale shadow of what it used to be’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Change in Contemporary English
A Grammatical Study
, pp. 51 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×