Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:25:44.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - UNEMPLOYMENT AND TRADE UNION STRENGTH IN PORTUGAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Nancy Bermeo
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

The impact of economic “crisis” and unemployment upon unions became a concern following the oil shocks of the 1970s (see Armingeon et al. 1981; Martin and Ross 1984; Mouriaux 1986). The present interest in the relationship between unemployment and unions in Europe follows an additional series of short-term economic cycles throughout which unemployment has continually increased, reaching unprecedented levels, and union strength has correspondingly – though not universally – tended to decline.

Union decline has been associated with factors such as the continuously changing composition of the labor force with the decline of industry in relation to services and feminization, rapid technological change displacing traditional manual worker union strongholds, shifts in the international division of industrial labor and industrial restructuring, changes in employer strategies and management practices and changes in the role of the state. Finally, it has also been emphasized that in numerous national cultures the values of workers were changing and attitudes toward unions were thus also changing to their disfavor. In the 1990s the consequences of such changes and mounting economic competition had a snowball effect upon employment, and attention has been increasingly drawn to structurally grounded and long-term unemployment as further impediments to future union development.

It is normal to suppose that union strength is dependent upon the conditions of the labor market. Indeed, this generally remains a good rule of thumb – at least with regard to economic downturn and growing unemployment. Very few workers are sufficiently insulated from economic insecurity by legal guarantees, institutional immunity, or labor market advantage for high unemployment not to have a depressing effect upon their willingness for collective action.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×