Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Map of Poland
- 1 From “Ethnic Cleansing” to Genocide to the “Final Solution”: The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy, 1939–1941
- 2 Nazi Policy: Decisions for the Final Solution
- 3 Jewish Workers in Poland: Self-Maintenance, Exploitation, Destruction
- 4 Jewish Workers and Survivor Memories: The Case of the Starachowice Labor Camp
- 5 German Killers: Orders from Above, Initiative from Below, and the Scope of Local Autonomy – The Case of Brest–Litovsk
- 6 German Killers: Behavior and Motivation in the Light of New Evidence
- Postscript
- Index
1 - From “Ethnic Cleansing” to Genocide to the “Final Solution”: The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy, 1939–1941
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 March 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Map of Poland
- 1 From “Ethnic Cleansing” to Genocide to the “Final Solution”: The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy, 1939–1941
- 2 Nazi Policy: Decisions for the Final Solution
- 3 Jewish Workers in Poland: Self-Maintenance, Exploitation, Destruction
- 4 Jewish Workers and Survivor Memories: The Case of the Starachowice Labor Camp
- 5 German Killers: Orders from Above, Initiative from Below, and the Scope of Local Autonomy – The Case of Brest–Litovsk
- 6 German Killers: Behavior and Motivation in the Light of New Evidence
- Postscript
- Index
Summary
Why the emphasis on decision and policy making, it might be asked. Is this not an exhausted topic whose time has come and gone with the intentionalist/functionalist controversy of the late 1970s and early 1980s, characterized by unduly polarized alternative interpretations? The intentionalists emphasized the centrality of Adolf Hitler's ideology, predetermined plans, and opportunistic decision making, whereas the functionalists emphasized the dysfunction and unplanned destructive implosion of an unguided bureaucratic structure and tension-filled political movement that had driven themselves into a dead end. One approach perceived the Final Solution as being more like the Manhattan Project, a massive and well-planned program that produced the destruction intended, whereas the other perceived it as a kind of Chernobyl, the unintended but all too predictable by-product of a dysfunctional system.
If the intentionalist/functionalist controversy in this highly polarized form is no longer at the center of Holocaust research, nonetheless a much more nuanced debate over Hitler and the origins of the Final Solution, based on a much vaster documentary collection, has found new life in the 1990s. In this debate, virtually all the participants agree on the centrality of the year 1941 and an incremental decision-making process in which Hitler played a key role. What is being debated are the relative weighting of the different decisions taken in 1941 and the different historical contexts invoked to explain the importance and timing of those decisions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Nazi Policy, Jewish Workers, German Killers , pp. 1 - 25Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
- 1
- Cited by