Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:19:59.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER 14 - Ecological studies of released lacewings in crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

P. K. McEwen
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
T. R. New
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
A. E. Whittington
Affiliation:
National Museums of Scotland
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of augmentative releases of lacewings in the field has varied greatly, with experimental studies reporting from 0% to 100% pest reduction (for reviews, see Ridgway & Murphy, 1984; King et al., 1985; Daane et al., 1998). Numerous factors can influence lacewing release effectiveness, and while some can be controlled (e.g. release rate), the success or failure of many release programmes is contingent upon the ecological interactions at the release site. For this reason, to realise fully the commercial potential of lacewings, the ecological interactions among lacewings, their prey, and the release environment must be better understood. Crucial areas of ecological study discussed here include: (1) the influence of environmental or host plant conditions on lacewing performance, (2) the role of other natural enemies on released lacewing density, (3) the effect of pesticide residues in the release environment, and (4) the importance of predator-prey interactions in the field. Given the above concerns, research has recently been conducted that helps to categorise the ecological relationship of released lacewings with respect to target pest(s) and the biotic or abiotic factors in the release environment.

HABITAT INFLUENCE ON RELEASE EFFECTIVENESS

The impact of predators can vary between habitats, as described by Hodek (1993) for aphidophagous predators, and many predators may be rendered ineffective without leaving the release site. Not surprisingly, different species of lacewings appear to be associated with certain habitats, such as conifers or broad-leafed trees (New, 1975), and lacewings released into less desirable habitats may have reduced effectiveness against an otherwise acceptable prey species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×