Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:18:37.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Simon A. B. Schropp
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO
A Law and Economics Analysis
, pp. 324 - 346
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. and Snidal, D. 1998. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1): 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. 2002. “Constructivism in International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, B., and Risse, T. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage), pp. 95–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, V. K. and Dupont, C. 1999. “Goods, Games and Institutions,” International Political Science Review 20(4): 393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, V. K. and Dupont, C. 2004. “Collaboration and Coordination in the Global Political Economy,” in Ravenhill, J. (ed.), Global Political Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 28–49Google Scholar
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., and Rey, P. 1990. “On Renegotiation Design,” European Economic Review 34(2–3): 322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., and Rey, P. 1994. “Renegotiation Design with Unverifiable Information,” Econometrica 62(2): 257–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, G. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston, MA: Little Brown)Google Scholar
Anderson, K. 2002. “Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement,” CEPR Discussion Paper no. 3578
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. and Keohane, R. 1986. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” World Politics 38(1): 226–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. and Gertner, R. 1989. “Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: an Economic Theory of Default Rules,” Yale Law Journal 99(1): 87–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. and Gertner, R. 1992. “Strategic Contractual Inefficiency and the Optimal Choice of Legal Rules,” Yale Law Journal 101(4): 729–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. and Talley, E. 1995a. “Distinguishing between Consensual and Nonconsensual Advantages of Liability Rules,” Yale Law Journal 105(1): 235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. and Talley, E. 1995b. “Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade,” Yale Law Journal 104(5): 1027–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. 2007. “Remedies in the WTO: an Economic Perspective.” Mimeo
Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P. C., and Staiger, R. W. 2002. “It's a Question of Market Access,” American Journal of International Law 96(1): 56–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P. C., and Staiger, R. W. 2003. “The Case for Auctioning Countermeasures in the WTO,” NBER Working Paper Series no. 9920
Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P. C., and Staiger, R. W. 2005. “The Case for Tradeable Remedies in the WTO,” in Evenett, S. and Hoekman, B. (eds.), Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation (Washington, DC: Palgrave/Macmillan and World Bank), pp. 56–76Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 1990. “A Theory of Managed Trade,” American Economic Review 80(4): 779–795Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 1997. “Multilateral Tariff Cooperation during the Formation of Free Trade Areas,” International Economic Review 38(2): 291–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 1999. “An Economic Theory of GATT,” American Economic Review 89(1): 215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 2002a. “Economic Theory and the Interpretation of GATT/WTO,” American Economist 46(2): 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 2002b. The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 2005a. “Enforcement, Private Political Pressure and the GATT/WTO Escape Clause.” Mimeo
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. 2005b. “Enforcement, Private Political Pressure, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Escape Clause,” Journal of Legal Studies 34: 471–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. G. 1990. “Self-Interest and Cooperation in Long-Term Contracts,” Journal of Legal Studies 19(2): 583–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (ed.) 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: the Contemporary Debate (New York, NY: Columbia University Press)
Baldwin, R. 1987. “Politically Realistic Objective Functions and Trade Policy,” Economic Letters 24: 287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. 1989. “The Political Economy of Trade Policy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, P. A. 1967. The Political Economy of Growth (New York: Monthly Review Press)Google Scholar
Barfield, C. E. 2001. Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: the Future of the World Trade Organization (Washington, DC: The AEI Press)Google Scholar
Barfield, C. E. 2005. “Anti-dumping Reform: Time to Go Back to Basics,” World Economy 28(5): 719–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, J. H., Goldstein, J., Josling, T. E., and Steinberg, R. H. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Barzel, Y. 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P. and Maggi, G. 2002. “Rigidity, Discretion, and the Costs of Writing Contracts,” American Economic Review 92(4): 798–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, J. H. 1996. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More,” American Journal of International Law 90(3): 416–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, W., Broz, L., and Leblang, D. 2002. “Special Issue on the Political Economy of Monetary Institutions,” International Organization (Autumn): 693–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. 1988. Protectionism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. 2002. “The Unwinnable War,” Financial Times, January 29
Bhandari, J. S. and Sykes, A. O. 1998. Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blonigen, B. A. and Bown, C. P. 2003. “Antidumping and Retaliation Threats,” Journal of International Economics 60(2): 249–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C. P. 2001. “Antidumping Against the Backdrop of Disputes in the GATT/WTO System.” Mimeo
Bown, C. P. 2002a. “The Economics of Trade Disputes, the GATT's Article XXIII, and the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding,” Economics and Politics 14(3): 283–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C. P. 2002b. “Why are Safeguards under the WTO So Unpopular?,” World Trade Review 1(1): 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C. P. 2004. “On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” Review of Economics and Statistics 86(3): 811–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C. P. and Hoekman, B. 2005. “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(4): 861–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C. P. and Pauwelyn, J. 2009. The Law, Economics and Politics of Trade Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
Brainard, L. S. and Verdier, T. 1994. “Lobbying and Adjustment in Declining Industries,” European Economic Review 38(3–4): 586–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J. 1987. “Rationales for Strategic Trade and Industrial Policy,” in Krugman, P. R. (ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 23–46Google Scholar
Brander, J. 1995. “Strategic Trade Policy,” in Grossman, G. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Amsterdam: North Holland), pp. 1395–1455Google Scholar
Brander, J. and Spencer, B. 1985. “Export Subsidies and Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics 18(1–2): 83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuss, F. 2004. “WTO Dispute Settlement: an Economic Analysis of Four EU–US Mine Trade Wars,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4(4): 275–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, M. and Broek, N. 2005. “Financial Compensation in the WTO: Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(1): 101–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bütler, M. and Hauser, H. 2002. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: a First Assessment from an Economic Perspective,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16(2): 503–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A. D. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” Harvard Law Review 85(6): 1089–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E. H. 1939. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939 (New York: Harper and Row)Google Scholar
Cass, D. Z. 2005. The Constitutionalization of the WTO (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. 2001. “Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions,” American Journal of International Law 95(4): 792–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, S. 2002a. “Should the Teeth be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions,” in Kennedy, D. L. M. and Southwick, J. D. (eds.), Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 602–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, S. 2002b. “Triangulating the World Trade Organization,” American Journal of International Law 96(1): 28–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, S. 2002c. “The WTO's Problematic ‘Last Resort’ Against Non-Compliance,” Aussenwirtschaft 57(4): 409–440Google Scholar
Charny, D. 1991. “Hypothetical Bargains: the Normative Structure of Contract Interpretation,” Michigan Law Review 89(7): 1815–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase-Dunn, C. 1998. Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy, 2nd edn. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield)Google Scholar
Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. 1990. “From Law Enforcement to Dispute Settlement,” International Security 14(4): 147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. 1993a. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. 1993b. “On Compliance,” International Organization 47(Spring): 175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. 1998. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” World Politics 50(2): 324–348Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. 1998. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” World Politics 50(2): 324–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, S. N. S. 1992. “On the New Institutional Economics,” in Werin, L. and Wijkander, H. (eds.), Contract Economics (Oxford and Cambridge: Basil Blackwell), pp. 48–65Google Scholar
Chung, T.-Y. 1991. “Incomplete Contracts, Specific Investments, and Risk Sharing,” Review of Economic Studies 58(5): 1031–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, New Series 4(16): 386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. M. 1999. “Implied Terms and Interpretation in Contract Law,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/University of Ghent), pp. 78–99Google Scholar
Copeland, B. 1990. “Strategic Interaction Among Nations: Negotiable and Non-Negotiable Trade Barriers,” Canadian Journal of Economics 23(1): 84–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, R. 1993. “The Relational Move: Some Questions from Law and Economics,” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 3: 91–114Google Scholar
Craswell, R. 1999. “Contract Law: General Theories,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/University of Ghent), pp. 1–24Google Scholar
Dam, K. W. 1970. The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Davey, W. J. 2005a. “Evaluating WTO Dispute Settlement: What Results Have Been Achieved through Consultations and Implementation of Panel Reports?,” paper presented at the Conference on the WTO at 10, Tokyo, Japan, October 25
Davey, W. J. 2005b. “The Sutherland Report on Dispute Settlement: a Comment,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(2): 321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bièvre, D. 2004. “Governance in International Trade: Judicialisation and Positive Integration in the WTO” (Bonn: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods), pp. 1–23. Mimeo
Diego-Fernandez, M. 2004. “Compensation and Retaliation: a Developing Country's Perspective.” Mimeo
Dixit, A. 1987. “Strategic Aspects of Trade Policy,” in Bewley, T. F. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 329–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. 2007. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Downs, G. W. and Rocke, D. 1995. Optimal Imperfection? Institutions and Domestic Politics in International Relations (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press)Google Scholar
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., and Barsoom, P. N. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?,” International Organization 50(3): 379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, W. J and Nicolaïdis, K. 1992. “Ideas, Interests and Institutionalization: ‘Trade in Services’ and the Uruguay Round,” in Haas, P. M. (ed.), Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press), pp. 37–100Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. 1999. “Economic Analysis of International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law 24(Winter): 1–55Google Scholar
Eaton, J. and Grossman, G. 1986. “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 51(2): 383–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlin, A. S. and Reichelstein, S. 1996. “Holdups, Standard Breach Remedies, and Optimal Investment,” American Economic Review 86(3): 478–501Google Scholar
Ethier, W. J. 1998. “Regionalism in a Multilateral World,” Journal of Political Economy 106(6): 1214–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, W. J. 2001a. “Punishments and Dispute Settlement in Trade Agreements,” PIER Working Paper no. 01–21
Ethier, W. J. 2001b. “Theoretical Problems in Negotiating Trade Liberalization,” European Journal of Political Economy 17(2): 209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, W. J. 2002. “Escape and Entry Mechanisms in the Multilateral Trading System,” PIER Working Paper no. 02–009
Ethier, W. J. 2004a. “Intellectual Property Rights and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization,” Journal of International Economic Law 7(2): 449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, W. J. 2004b. “Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World,” Review of International Economics 12(3): 303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, W. J. 2004c. “Trade Policies Based on Political Externalities: an Exploration,” PIER Working Paper no. 04–006
Ethier, W. J. 2006. “Selling Protection for Sale,” PIER Working Paper no. 06–14
Fearon, J. D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation,” International Organization 52(2): 269–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, R. and Olsen, K. 2004. “The Spread of Antidumping Regimes and the Role of Retaliation in Filings.” Mimeo
Finger, J. M. 1991. “The GATT as an International Discipline over Trade Restrictions,” in Vaubel, R. and Willett, T. D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Organizations (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 121–145Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. 1998. “GATT Experience with Safeguards: Making Economic and Political Sense of the Possibilities that the GATT Allows to Restrict Imports,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 2000
Finger, J. M. 2002. “Safeguards: Making Sense of GATT/WTO Provisions Allowing for Import Restrictions,” in Hoekman, B., Mattoo, A., and English, P. (eds.), Development, Trade and the WTO (Washington, DC: World Bank), pp. 195–205Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. (ed.) 1993. Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press)CrossRef
Finger, J. M., Hall, H. K., and Nelson, D. R. 1982. “The Political Economy of Administered Protection,” American Economic Review 72(3): 452–466Google Scholar
Finger, J. M., Ng, F., and Wangchuck, S. 2001. “Antidumping as Safeguard Policy.” Mimeo
Finger, J. M. and Winters, A. L. 2002. “Reciprocity in the WTO,” in Hoekman, B., Mattoo, A., and English, P. (eds.), Development, Trade and the WTO (Washington, DC: World Bank), pp. 50–59Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. and Zlate, A. 2003. “WTO Rules that Allow New Trade Restrictions: the Public Interest is a Bastard Child,” paper prepared for the UN Millenium Project Task Force, April
Finnemore, M. 1996. National Interests in International Society (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52(4): 887–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 2001. “Taking Stock: the Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, A. G. 1969. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil (New York: Monthly Review Press)Google Scholar
Friedman, D. 1989. “The Efficient Breach Fallacy,” Journal of Legal Studies 18(1): 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. 1990. “Moral Hazard and Renegotiation in Agency Contracts,” Econometrica 58(6): 1279–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furusawa, T. 1999. “The Optimal Penal Code vs. Infinite Nash Reversion in Trade Liberalization,” Review of International Economics 7(4): 673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. N. 1980. Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective: the Origins and the Prospects of our International Economic Order (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Gerhart, P. 2003. “The Two Constitutional Visions of the World Trade Organization,” Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 24(1): 1–74Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, C. and Scott, R. E. 1981. “Principles of Relational Contracts,” Virginia Law Review 67(2): 1089–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, V. P. 1976. “Regulation and Administered Contracts,” Bell Journal of Economics 7: 426–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. 1996. “International Law and Domestic Institutions: Reconciling North American Unfair Trade Laws,” International Organization 50: 541–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. 1998. “International Institutions and Domestic Politics: GATT, WTO, and the Liberalization of International Trade,” in Krueger, A. O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press), pp. 133–152Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. and Gowa, J. 2002. “US National Power and the Postwar Trading Regime,” World Trade Review 1(2): 153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R., and Slaughter, A.-M. 2000. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 54(3): 385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. and Martin, L. L. 2000. “Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: a Cautionary Note,” International Organization 54(3): 603–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, J. 1989. “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade,” American Political Science Review 83(4): 1245–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, J. and Mansfield, E. D. 1993. “Power Politics and International Trade,” American Political Science Review 87(2): 408–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grané, P. 2001. “Remedies under WTO law,” Journal of International Economic Law 4(4): 755–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, J. M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: a Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42(3): 485–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, J. M. 1990. Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
Grieco, J. M. and Ikenberry, G. J. 2003. State Power and World Markets: the International Political Economy (New York/London: W. W. Norton and Co.)Google Scholar
Grossman, G. 1987. “Strategic Export Promotion: a Critique,” in Krugman, P. R. (ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. 1994. “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review 84(4): 833–850Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. 1995a. “The Politics of Free-Trade Agreements,” American Economic Review 85(4): 667–690Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. 1995b. “Trade Wars and Trade Talks,” Journal of Political Economy 103(4): 675–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. 2001. Special Interest Politics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Maggi, G. 1998. “Free Trade Versus Strategic Trade: a Peek into Pandora's Box,” in Soto, R., Ramachandran, R., and Mino, K. (eds.), Global Competition and Integration (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press)Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Mavroidis, P. C. 2004. “United States – Section 110(5) of the Copyright Act, Resource to Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU: Would've or Should've: Impaired Benefits due to Copyright Infringement,” in Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: a Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration,” Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 691–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J. and Perry, M. 1986. “Perfect Sequential Equilibrium,” Journal of Economic Theory 39(1): 97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, L. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenspecht, H. K. 1988. “Dumping and Dynamic Competition,” Journal of International Economics 25(3–4): 225–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A. 2002a. “The Political Economy of Litigation and Settlement in the WTO.” Mimeo
Guzman, A. 2002b. “A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law,” California Law Review 90(6): 1823–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, G. 2002. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” in Haas, P. M. (ed.), Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press), pp. 3–35Google Scholar
Hadfield, G. K. 1990. “Problematic Relations: Franchising and the Law of Incomplete Contracts,” Stanford Law Review 42(4): 927–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, G. K. 1994. “Judicial Competence and the Interpretation of Incomplete Contracts,” Journal of Legal Studies 23(1): 159–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S. and Simmons, B. A. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization 41(3): 491–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162(3859): 1243–1248Google ScholarPubMed
Harms, P., Mattoo, A., and Schuknecht, L. 2003. “Explaining Liberalization Commitments in Financial Services Trade,” World Bank Policy Research Paper Series no. 2999
Hart, O. D. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure (Oxford: Clarendon Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, O. D. and Holmström, B. 1987. “The Theory of Contracts,” in Bewley, T. R. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 396–398Google Scholar
Hart, O. D. and Moore, J. D. 1988. “Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation,” Econometrica 56(4): 755–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenclever, H., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V. 1997. Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenclever, H., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V. 2000. “Integrating Theories of International Regimes,” Review of International Studies 26(1): 3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, H. 1986. “Domestic Policy Foundation and Domestic Policy Function of International Trade Rules,” Aussenwirtschaft 41(2/3): 171–184Google Scholar
Hauser, H. 2000. “Die WTO-Streitschlichtung aus einer Law and Economics Perspektive,” in Berg, H. (ed.), Theorie der Wirtschaftspolitik: Erfahrungen, Probleme, Perspektiven (Berlin: Verlag Duncker & Humblot), pp. 79–111Google Scholar
Hauser, H. and Roitinger, A. 2003. “Renegotiation in Transatlantic Trade Disputes,” in Petersmann, E.-U. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Transatlantic Economic Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 487–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, H. and Roitinger, A. 2004. “Two Perspectives on International Trade Agreements,” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64(3): 641–658Google Scholar
Hendricks, K. and Wilson, C. 1985. “The War of Attrition in Discrete Time,” International Economic Review 29(4): 663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermalin, B. E. and Katz, M. L. 1993. “Judicial Modification of Contracts between Sophisticated Parties: a More Complete View of Incomplete Contracts and their Breach,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 9(2): 230–255Google Scholar
Herzing, M. 2005. Essays on Uncertainty and Escape in Trade Agreements, dissertation (Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden)
Hillman, A. L. 1982. “Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives,” American Economic Review 72(5): 1180–1190Google Scholar
Hillman, A. and Moser, P. 1996. “Trade Liberalization as Politically Optimal Exchange of Market Access,” in Canzeroni, M., Ethier, W. J., and Grilli, V., The New Transatlantic Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 295–312Google Scholar
Hillman, A. L. and Ursprung, H. W. 1988. “Domestic Politics, Foreign Interests, and International Trade Policy,” American Economic Review 78(4): 729–745Google Scholar
Hillman, A. L. and Ursprung, H. W. 1994. “Domestic Politics, Foreign Interests, and International Trade Policy: Reply,” American Economic Review 84(5): 1476–1478Google Scholar
Hillman, A., Long, N., and Moser, P. 1995. “Modelling Reciprocal Trade Liberalization: the Political-Economy and National-Welfare Perspectives,” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 131(3): 505–515Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. M. and Kostecki, M. 1995. The Political Economy of the World Trading System (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. M. and Mavroidis, P. C. 1996. “Dumping, Antidumping and Antitrust,” Journal of World Trade 30(1): 27–52Google Scholar
Holmes, P., Rollo, J., and Young, A. R. 2003. “Emerging Trends in WTO Dispute Settlement: Back to the GATT?,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 3133
Holmström, B. and Tirole, J. 1989. “The Theory of the Firm,” in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. D., Handbook of Industrial Economics (New York: Elsevier Science Publishing), pp. 61–133Google Scholar
Horlick, G. N. and Palmer, C. R. 2002. “Subsidies, Antidumping and Countervailing Duties in the ALCA/FTAA.” Mimeo
Horn, H. 2006. “National Treatment in the GATT,” American Economic Review 96(1): 394–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H., Maggi, G., and Staiger, R. W. 2005. “The GATT/WTO as an Incomplete Contract and the Role of Dispute Settlement Procedures.” Mimeo
Horn, H., Maggi, G., and Staiger, R. W. 2006. “The GATT/WTO as an Incomplete Contract.” Mimeo
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. 2003. “What Should be Required of a Safeguard Investigation? A Comment on US – Lamb,” in Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C., The WTO Case-Law of 2001: the American Law Institute Reporters' Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 72–114Google Scholar
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. 2006a. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Data Set: User's Guide Version 1.0.” Mimeo
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. 2006b. “The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2004: Some Descriptive Statistics.” Mimeo
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.) 2004. The WTO Case Law of 2001 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRef
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. 2005. The WTO Case Law of 2002 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRef
Howse, R. and Mavroidis, P. C. 2003. The Law of the World Trade Organization
Howse, R. and Nicolaïdis, K. 2001. “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO is a Step too Far,” in Porter, R. B.et al. (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, Legitimacy: the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press)Google Scholar
Howse, R. and Staiger, R. W. 2005. “United States Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ARB, 24 February 2004,” World Trade Review 4(2): 295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, R. E. 1990. The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (New York: Praeger)Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. 1993. “Circumventing Democracy: the Political Morality of Trade Negotiations,” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 25: 311–322Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. 2002. “The Adequacy of WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies: a Developing Country Perspective,” in Hoekman, B., Mattoo, A., and English, P., Development, Trade and the WTO (Washington, DC: World Bank), pp. 81–91Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C. and Goodrich, B. 2003a. “Next Move on Steel: Revocation or Retaliation?,” IIE Policy Briefs no. 03–10
Hufbauer, G. C. and Goodrich, B. 2003b. “Steel Policy: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” IIE Policy Brief no. 03-1
Hull, C. 1948. The Memoirs of Cordell Hull (London: Hodder and Stoughton)Google Scholar
Hungerford, T. L. 1991. “GATT: a Cooperative Equilibrium in a Noncooperative Trading Regime?,” Journal of International Economics 31(3–4): 357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hviid, M. 1999. “Long-Term Contracts and Relational Contracts,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/(University of Ghent), pp. 46–72Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. J., Lake, D. A., and Mastanduno, M. 1989. “The State and American Foreign Economic Policy,” International Organization 42(1): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. A. 1996. Against the Tide: Intellectual History of Free Trade (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Irwin, D. A. 2005. Free Trade under Fire (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Irwin, D. A., Mavroidis, P. C., and Sykes, A. O. 2008. The Genesis of the GATT (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 1969. World Trade and the Law of GATT (New York: Bobbs-Merrill)Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 1997a. The World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 1997b. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation,” American Journal of International Law 91(1): 60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 2004. “International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to ‘Buy Out’?,” American Journal of International Law 98(1): 109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawara, F. and Kwa, A. 2004. Behind the Scenes at the WTO: the Real World of International Trade Negotiations: Lessons of Cancun (London/New York: Zed Books)Google Scholar
Johnson, H. G. 1953. “Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation,” Review of Economic Studies 21(2): 142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. S. 1990. “Strategic Bargaining and the Economic Theory of Contract Default Rules,” Yale Law Journal 100: 615–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolls, C. 1997. “Contracts as Bilateral Commitments: a New Perspective on Contract Modification,” Journal of Legal Studies 26(January): 203–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. 2004. “The Safeguards Mess Revisited: the Fundamental Problem,” World Trade Review 3(1): 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josling, T. E. 2004. “WTO Dispute Settlement and the EU–US Mini Trade Wars: a Commentary on Fritz Breuss,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4(4): 337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahnemann, D. 2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics,” American Economic Review 93(5): 1449–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1994. “Accuracy in the Determination of Liability,” Journal of Law and Economics 37(1): 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1995. “Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley,” Yale Law Journal 105(1): 221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1996a. “Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages,” Journal of Law and Economics 39(1): 191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1996b. “Property Rules versus Liability Rules: an Economic Analysis,” Harvard Law Review 109(4): 713–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, A. 2004. “WTO Dispute Settlement: What Role for Economic Analysis?,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4(4): 365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, A. and Schropp, S. A. B. 2008. “Indisputably Essential: the Economics of Dispute Settlement Institutions in Trade Agreements,”Journal of World Trade 42(5): 785–812Google Scholar
Kenney, R. W. and Klein, B. 1983. “The Economics of Block Booking,” Journal of Law and Economics 26(3): 497–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 1993. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War,” in Baldwin, D. A. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: the Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 269–300Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 2002. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London/New York: Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)Google Scholar
Kirchgässner, G. 2000. Homo Oeconomicus (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck)Google Scholar
Kleen, P. 1989. “The Safeguard Issue in the Uruguay Round: a Comprehensive Approach.” Journal of World Trade 23(5): 73–92Google Scholar
Klein, B. 1996. “Why Hold-ups Occur: the Self-Enforcing Range of Contractual Relationships,” Economic Enquiry 34: 444–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., and Alchian, A. A. 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics 21(October): 297–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimenko, M., Ramey, G., and Watson, J. 2002. “Recurrent Trade Agreements and the Value of External Enforcement.” Mimeo
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization 55(4): 761–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovenock, D. and Thursby, M. 1992. “GATT, Dispute Settlement, and Cooperation,” Economics and Politics 4: 151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. D. 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics 28(2): 317–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F. V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F. V. and Ruggie, J. G. 1986. “International Organization: a State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization 40(4): 753–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, M. I. 1999. “Property Rules vs. Liability Rules,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/University of Ghent), pp. 782–793Google Scholar
Krishna, P. and Mitra, D. 1999. “Reciprocated Unilateralism: a Political Economy Perspective.” Mimeo
Krugman, P. R. 1991. “The Move Toward Free Trade Zones,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review (November): 5–25
Krugman, P. R. 1993. “What Do Undergrads Need to Know about Trade?,” American Economic Review 83(2): 23–26Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. 1997. “What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?,” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 113–120Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. and Obstfeld, M. 1994. International Economics: Theory and Policy (New York: HarperCollins College Publishers)Google Scholar
Kucik, J. and Reinhardt, E. 2007. “Does Flexibility Promote Cooperation? ‘Efficient Breach’ in the Global Trade Regime.” Mimeo
Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. 1977. “Rules Rather than Discretion: the Inconsistency of Optimal Plans,” Journal of Political Economy 85(3): 473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. T. F. 2006. “Reconstructing Embedded Liberalism: John Gerard Ruggie and Constructivist Approaches to the Study of the International Trade Regime,” Journal of International Economic Law 9(1): 81–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapan, H. E. 1988. “The Optimal Tariff, Production Lags and Time Consistency,” American Economic Review 78(3): 395–401Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. Z. 2003. Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation under the WTO (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics)Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S. and Mah, J. S. 1998. “Reflections on the Agreement on Safeguards in the WTO,” World Competition 21(6): 25–31Google Scholar
Levy, P. I. 1997. “A Political-Economic Analysis of Free Trade Agreements,” American Economic Review 87(4): 509–519Google Scholar
Levy, P. I. 1999. “Lobbying and International Cooperation in Tariff Setting,” Journal of International Economics 47: 345–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, P. I. 2003. “Non-Tariff Barriers as a Test of Political Economic Theories,” Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Center Discussion Paper no. 852
Lindsey, B. 2000. “The U.S. Antidumping Law: Rhetoric versus Reality,” Journal of World Trade 34(1): 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, B., Griswold, D. T., Groombridge, M., and Lukas, A. 1999. “Seattle and Beyond: a WTO Agenda for the New Millenium,” CATO Center for Trade Policy Studies no. 8
Lindsey, B. and Ikenson, D. J. 2002. “Reforming the Antidumping Agreement: a Road Map for WTO Negotiations,” Cato Institute Briefing Paper no. 21
Lindsey, B. and Ikenson, D. J. 2003. Antidumping Exposed: the Devilish Details of Unfair Trade Law (Washington, DC: Cato Institute)Google Scholar
Ludema, R. 2001. “Optimal International Trade Agreements and Dispute Settlement Procedures,” European Journal of Political Economy 17(2): 355–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, S. 1985. “An Empirical View of Contract,” Wisconsin Law Review 5: 465–482Google Scholar
MacLeod, W. B. 2006. “Reputations, Relationships and the Enforcement of Incomplete Contracts,” Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research (CESifo) no. 1730
Macneil, I. 1978. “Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law,” Northwestern University Law Review 72(6): 854–905Google Scholar
Macneil, I. 1981. “Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a ‘Rich Classificatory Apparatus,’Northwestern University Law Review 75(6): 1081–1063Google Scholar
Macneil, I. 1982. “Efficient Breach of Contract: Circles in the Sky,” Virginia Law Review 68(5): 947–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G. 1999a. “The Role of Multilateral Institutions in International Trade Cooperation,” American Economic Review 89(1): 190–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G. 1999b. “Strategic Trade Policy under Incomplete Information,” International Economic Review 40(3): 571–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G. and Rodriguez-Clare, A. 1998. “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressure,” Journal of Political Economy 106(3): 574–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G. and Rodriguez-Clare, A. 2005. “A Political Economy Theory of Trade Agreements,” CEPR Working Paper no. 5321
Mahlstein, K. and Schropp, S. A. B. 2007. “Optimal Rules for Escape and Remedy in Trade Agreements,” HEI Working Paper 27–2007 (available at www.hei.unige.ch)
Mahoney, P. G. 1999. “Contract Remedies: General,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/University of Ghent), pp. 117–140Google Scholar
Malanczuk, P. 1997. Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law (London: Routledge)Google Scholar
Martin, A. and Vergote, W. 2004. “A Case for Strategic Antidumping,” Columbia University Working Paper
Martin, L. L. 1993. “The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism,” in Ruggie, J. G. (ed.), Multilateralism Matters: the Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 91–121Google Scholar
Martin, L. L. and Simmons, B. A. 1998. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,” International Organization 52(4): 729–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskin, E. and Newberry, D. 1990. “Disadvantageous Oil Tariffs and Dynamic Consistency,” American Economic Review 80(1): 143–156Google Scholar
Maskin, E. and Tirole, J. 1999. “Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts,” Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 83–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, S. E. 1999. “Contractual Choice,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/University of Ghent), pp. 25–45Google Scholar
Matsuyama, K. 1990. “Perfect Equilibria in a Trade Liberalization Game,” American Economic Review 80(3): 480–492Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. 1993. “Government Procurement Agreement; the Trondheim Case: the Remedies Issue,” Aussenwirtschaft 48(1): 77–94Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. 2000. “Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place,” European Journal of International Law 11(4): 763–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. 2005. “Enforcement of WTO Obligations: Remedies and Compliance.” Mimeo
Mavroidis, P. C. 2006. “Remedies in the WTO: a Framework of Analysis.” Mimeo
Mavroidis, P. C. 2007. Trade in Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mayer, W. 1994. “Optimal Pursuit of Safeguard Actions over Time,” in Deardoff, A. and Stern, R. (eds.), Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), p. 629Google Scholar
McGinnis, J. O. and Movsesian, M. L. 2000. “The World Trade Constitution,” Harvard Law Review 114: 511–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, J. 1997. “Size, Sunk Costs and Judge Bowker's Objection to Free Trade,” American Economic Review 87(3): 400–420Google Scholar
McLaren, J. 2002. “A Theory of Insidious Regionalism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(2): 571–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J. 1942. The Economic Basis of Durable Peace (London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd.)Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 1995. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19(3): 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medrado, R. G. 2004. “Re-negotiating Remedies in the WTO: a Multilateral Approach.” Mimeo
Menard, C. (ed.) 2004. The International Library of the New Institutional Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)
Messerlin, P. 2000. “Antidumping and Safeguards,” in Schott, J. (ed.), The WTO After Seattle (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics), pp. 159–183Google Scholar
Miller, J. N. 2000. “Origins of the GATT: British Resistance to American Multilateralism,” Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Bard College no. 318
Milner, H. V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Milner, H. V. and Rosendorff, P. B. 1997. “Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 117–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, D. 1999. “Endogenous Lobby Formation and Endogenous Protection,” American Economic Review 89(5): 1116–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics Among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf)Google Scholar
Morrow, J. D. 1994. “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution versus Information,” International Organization 48(3): 387–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, P. 1990. The Political Economy of the GATT (Grüsch: Verlag Ruegger)Google Scholar
Neufeld, I. N. 2001. “Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Procedures: Use or Abuse? Implications for Developing Countries,” UNCTAD Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series no. 9
Neven, D. 2000. Evaluating the Effects of Non-Tariff Barriers: the Economic Analysis of Protection in WTO Disputes (World Bank)
Nöldeke, G. and Schmidt, K. M. 1995. “Option Contracts and Renegotiation: a Solution to the Hold-up Problem,” Rand Journal of Economics 26(2): 163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (New York: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 1991. “Institutions,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Institutional Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. and Djordjevic, M. 2005. “Practical Aspects of Monetary Compensation, the US – Copyright Case,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(1): 127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, J. and Sell, S. 2006. “Reframing the Issue: the Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health in the WTO, 2001,” in Odell, J. (ed.), Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA (New York: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordover, J. A. and Rubinstein, A. 1986. “A Sequential Concession Game with Asymmetric Information,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(4): 879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M. J. 1985. “The Role of Risk Aversion in a Simple Bargaining Model,” in Roth, A. E. (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2003. “How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(3): 239–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, K. 1986. Cooperation under Anarchy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Palmeter, D. 1991a. “The Antidumping Law: a Legal and Administrative Non-Tariff Barrier,” in Kennedy, D. and Southwick, J. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 646–666Google Scholar
Palmeter, D. 1991b. “The Rhetoric and the Reality of the United States' Anti-Dumping Law,” World Economy 14(1): 19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, D. 1996. “A Commentary on the WTO Antidumping Code,” Journal of World Trade 30(4): 43–69Google Scholar
Palmeter, D. 2000. “The WTO as a Legal System,” Fordham International Journal 24(2000/2001): 444Google Scholar
Palmeter, D. and Alexandrov, S. A. 2002. “‘Inducing Compliance’ in WTO Settlement,” in Kennedy, D. L. M. and Southwick, J. D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 646–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2000. “Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach,” American Journal of International Law 94(2): 335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2001. “The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?,” American Journal of International Law 95(3): 535–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2003. Conflicts of Norms in Public International Law: How the WTO Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2006. “How Strongly Should We Protect and Enforce International Law?.” Mimeo
Penrose, E. F. 1953. Economic Planning for the Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1986. “Trade Policy as a Constitutional Problem,” Aussenwirtschaft 41(2/3): 405–439Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1991. “Non-Violation Complaints in Public International Trade Law,” German Yearbook of International Law 34: 175–231Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1995. “The Transformation of the World Trading System through the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization,” European Journal of International Law 6: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1998. “From the Hobbesian International Law of Coexistence to Modern Integration Law: the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” Journal of International Economic Law 1: 175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2002. “Constitutionalism and the WTO: from a State-Centered Approach Towards a Human Rights Approach in International Economic Law,” in Kennedy, O. and Southwick, J. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2003. “Human Rights and the Law of the World Trade Organization,” Journal of World Trade 37(2): 241–281Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2005. “Addressing Institutional Challenges to the WTO in the New Millennium: a Longer-Term Perspective,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(3): 647–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2006. “Multilevel Trade Governance in the WTO Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism,” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. 1988. Economic Analysis of the Law (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.)Google Scholar
Powell, R. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: the Neorealist-Neoliberalist Debate,” International Organization 48(2): 313–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, J. and Skeath, S. 2002. “The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings,” NBER Working Paper no. 8424
Putnam, R. D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization 42(3): 427–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Regan, D. 2006. “What are Trade Agreements For? Two Conflicting Stories Told by Economists, with a Lesson for Lawyers,” Journal of International Economic Law 9(4): 951–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. 1997. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions,” International Organization 51(4): 555–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. 1995. “Political Economy of Trade Policy,” in Grossman, G. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Amsterdam: New Holland), pp. 1457–1494Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics)Google Scholar
Rogerson, W. P. 1984. “Efficient Reliance and Damage Measures for Breach of Contract,” Rand Journal of Economics 15(1): 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitinger, A. 2004. The Institutional Design of Trade Policy Flexibility in the World Trade Order: Analysis and New Direction for Reform, Dissertation at Universität St. Gallen (HSG)
Romer, D. 1996. Advanced Macroeconomics (New York: McGraw Hill)Google Scholar
Rosendorff, B. P. 1996. “Voluntary Export Restraints, Antidumping Procedure, and Domestic Politics,” American Economic Review 86(3): 544–561Google Scholar
Rosendorff, B. P. 2005. “Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Procedures,” American Political Science Review 99(3): 389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorff, B. P. and Milner, H. V. 2001. “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape,” International Organization 55(4): 829–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model,” Econometrica 59(4): 777–793Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. 1998. Modeling Bounded Rationality (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36(2): 379–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (London/New York: Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. (ed.) 1993. Multilateralism Matters: the Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (New York: Columbia University Press)
Salanié, B. 1997. The Economics of Contracts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Sandler, T. 1992. Collective Action: Theory and Applications (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press)Google Scholar
Schermers, H. and Blokker, N. 1995. International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity, 3rd rev. edn. (Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar
Schropp, S. A. B. 2005. “The Case for Tariff Compensation in WTO Dispute Settlement,” Aussenwirtschaft 60(4): 485–528Google Scholar
Schropp, S. A. B. 2007a. “Efficient ‘Breach’, Adequate Remedies and Optimal Trade Liberalization: Theorizing about Trade Policy Flexibility in the WTO,” paper presented at the NCCR Democracy Module 1 Workshop (on file with the author)
Schropp, S. A. B. 2007b. “Revisiting the ‘Compliance-vs.-Rebalancing’ Debate in WTO Scholarship: Towards a Unified Research Agenda.” Mimeo
Schuknecht, L. 1992. Trade Protection in the European Community (Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers)Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. 1992. “Relational Contracts in the Courts: an Analysis of Incomplete Agreements and Judicial Strategies,” Journal of Legal Studies 21(2): 271–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, W. F. and Sykes, A. O. 1996. “Toward a Positive Theory of the Most Favored Nation Obligation and its Exceptions in the WTO/GATT System,” International Review of Law and Economics 16(1): 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, W. F. and Sykes, A. O. 2002a. “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the WTO/GATT System,” John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper no. 143
Schwartz, W. F. and Sykes, A. O. 2002b. “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the WTO/GATT System,” Journal of Legal Studies 31(1): 170–204Google Scholar
Scott, R. E. 1987. “Conflict and Cooperation in Long-term Contracts,” Californian Law Review 75(6): 2005–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. E. 1990. “A Relational Theory of Default Rules for Commercial Contracts,” Journal of Legal Studies 19(2): 597–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setear, J. K. 1997. “Responses to Breach of a Treaty and Rationalist International Relations Theory: the Rules of Release and Remediation in the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility,” Virginia Law Review 83: 1–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S. 1980. “Damage Measures for Breach of Contract,” Bell Journal of Economics 11(2): 466–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S. 1984. “The Design of Contracts and Remedies for Breach,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(1): 121–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B. A. and Martin, L. L. 2002. “International Organizations and Institutions,” in Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, B., and Risse, T. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage), pp. 192–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. 2003. The Stag Hunt and Evolution of Social Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. and Venables, A. 1991. “Counting the Cost of Voluntary Export Restraints in the European Market,” in Helpman, E. and Razin, A. (eds.), International Trade and Trade Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 187–220Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. 2000. “The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts,” International Organization 54(1): 137–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, D. 1997. “International Political Economy Approaches to International Institutions,” in Bhandari, J. S. and Sykes, A. O. (eds.), Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 477–512Google Scholar
Snidal, D. 2002. “Rational Choice and International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, B. and Risse, T. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage), pp. 73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spamann, H. 2006. “The Myth of ‘Rebalancing’ Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice,” Journal of International Economic Law 9(1): 31–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N. 2005. “Non-Discrimination in GATT/WTO: Was there Anything to Begin With and is there Anything Left?,” World Trade Review 4(1): 69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, R. W. 1995. “International Rules and Institutions for Trade Policy,” in Grossman, G. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Amsterdam: North Holland), pp. 1495–1551Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W. and Tabellini, G. 1987. “Discretionary trade policy and excessive protection,” American Economic Review 77(5): 823–837Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W. and Tabellini, G. 1989. “Rules and Discretion in Trade Policy,” European Economic Review 33(6): 1265–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, R. W. and Tabellini, G. 1999. “Do GATT Rules Help Governments Make Domestic Commitments?,” Economics and Politics 11(2): 109–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, A. 1983. “Coordination and Collaboration Regimes in an Anarchic World,” in Krasner, S. D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press), pp. 115–140Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. H. 2002. “Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization 56(2): 339–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economic Management and Science 2: 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, A. 1999. On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk (Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies)Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 1989. “Countervailing Duty Law: an Economic Perspective,” Columbia Law Review 89(2): 199–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 1991. “Protectionism as a “Safeguard”: a Positive Analysis of the GATT ‘Escape Clause’ with Normative Speculations,” University of Chicago Law Review 58(1): 255–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 1998. “Antidumping and Antitrust: What Problems Does Each Address?,” in Lawrence, R. Z. (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum: 1998 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution), pp. 1–43Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 1999. “International Trade,” in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Ghent: Edward Elgar/University of Ghent), pp. 1114–1132Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 2000. “The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?,” in Bronckers, M. and Quick, R. (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law (Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International), pp. 347–357Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. 2003. “The Safeguards Mess: a Critique of WTO Jurisprudence,” World Trade Review 3(3): 261–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarullo, D. 2002. “Book Review: the EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues,” Journal of International Economic Law 5(4): 941–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharakan, P. K. M. 1995. “Political Economy and Contingent Protection,” Economic Journal 105(433): 1550–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharakan, P. K. M. and Waelbroeck, J. 1994. “Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Decisions in the EC and in the US: an Experiment in Comparative Political Economy,” European Economic Review 38(2): 171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. and Snidal, D. 2005. “Guarding the Equilibrium: Regime Management in the WTO,” Working Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
Tirole, J. 1994. “Incomplete Contracts: Where Do We Stand?,” Econometrica 67(4): 741–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornell, A. 1991. “Time Inconsistency of Protectionists Programs,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(August): 963–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. 1999. “The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution,” Harvard Journal of International Law 40: 333–363Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. 2006. “Building the WTO Cathedral.” Mimeo
Trebilcock, M. and Howse, R. 2006. International Trade Regulation (London: Routledge)Google Scholar
Tumlir, J. 1985. “Conception of the International Economic and Legal Order,” World Economy 8(1): 85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, C. M. and Jackson, J. H. 2002. “Some Reflections on Compliance with WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions,” Law and Policy in International Business 33(4): 555–567Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press)Google Scholar
Waltz, K. 1954. Man, State, and War: a Theoretical Analysis (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Wendt, A. 1999a. “On the Via Media: a Response to the Critics,” Review of International Studies 26(1): 165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, A. 1999b. Social Theory of International Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1979. “Transaction-Cost Economics: the Governance of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics 22(October): 233–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press)Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 2000. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature 38(3): 595–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willig, R. D. 1998. “Economic Effects of Antidumping Policy,” in Lawrence, R. Z. (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum: 1998 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution), pp. 57–79Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. 2003. “Regulatory Transparency, Developing Countries and the WTO,” World Trade Review 2(2): 157–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Trade Organization 2004. The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium, Report by the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panichpakdi (Geneva: World Trade Organization)Google Scholar
,World Trade Organization 2005. Trade, Standards and the WTO, World Trade Report 2005 (Geneva: World Trade Organization)Google Scholar
,World Trade Organization 2007. Sixty Years of Multilateral Trading System: Achievements and Challenges, World Trade Report 2007 (Geneva: World Trade Organization)Google Scholar
Yarbrough, B. V. and Yarbrough, R. M. 1987. “Institutions for the Governance of Opportunism in International Trade,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3(1): 129–139Google Scholar
Yarbrough, B. V. and Yarbrough, R. M. 1997. “Dispute Settlement in International Trade: Regionalism and Procedural Coordination,” in Mansfield, E. D. and Milner, H. V. (eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (New York: Columbia University Press) pp. 134–163Google Scholar
Zimmermann, T. A. 2006. Negotiating the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (London: Cameron May)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Simon A. B. Schropp, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
  • Book: Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511674570.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Simon A. B. Schropp, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
  • Book: Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511674570.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Simon A. B. Schropp, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
  • Book: Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511674570.012
Available formats
×