Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T11:32:28.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Advanced breast biopsy techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Michael J. Michell
Affiliation:
King's College Hospital, London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Breast Cancer , pp. 146 - 168
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ellis, IO, Galea, MH, Locker, A, et al. Early experience in breast cancer screening: emphasis on development of protocols for triple assessment. Breast J 1993; 2: 148–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwig, L, Macaskill, P, Houssami, N. Evidence related to the investigation of breast symptoms; the triple test. Breast 2002; 11: 215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litherland, J. The role of needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Breast J 2001; 10: 383–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, L. Percutaneous image guided core biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. Am J Radiol 2000; 174: 1191–9.Google Scholar
Helbich, TH, Pfarl, G, Lomosschitz, F, et al. Role of core needle breast biopsy in probably benign lesions. Radiology 2000; 217: 527.Google Scholar
Teh, W, Evans, AJ, Wilson, ARM. Editorial. Definitive non-surgical Breast Diagnosis: the Role of the Radiologist. Clin Radiol, 1993; 53: 81–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, PD. Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast J 1999; 8: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisano, ED, Fajardo, LL, Tsimikas, J, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. Cancer 1998; 82: 678–88.Google Scholar
Schueller, G, Jaromi, S, Ponhold, L, et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 2008; 248: 406–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helbich, TH, Rudas, M, Haitel, A, et al. Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16- and 18-G biopsy needles. Am J Radiol 1998; 171: 59–63.Google Scholar
Dillon, MF, Hill, AD, Quinn, CM, et al. The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer with analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 701–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, L, Feng, TL, Dershaw, DD, et al. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998; 208: 717–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pijnappel, RM, Donk, M, Holland, R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 595–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallis, M, Tardivon, A, Helbich, T, el al. Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 581–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich, PM, Michell, MJ, Humphreys, S, et al. Stereotactic 14-G core biopsy of non-palpable breast cancer: What is the relationship between the number of core samples taken and the sensitivity for detection of malignancy?Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 384–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, G, Deissler, H, Strunz, K, et al. Ultrasound guided large core needle biopsy of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 231–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pijnappel, RM, Donk, M, Holland, R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 595–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38: 791–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schueller, G, Jaromi, S, Ponhold, L, et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 2008; 248: 406–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhillon, MS, Bradley, SA, England, DW. Mammotome biopsy: impact on preoperative diagnosis rate. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 276–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, SH, Klaus, AJ. Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 1997; 17: 1233–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burbank, F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rate. Am Surg 1997; 63: 988–95.Google Scholar
Zuiani, C, Mazzarella, F, Londero, V, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results, follow-up and correlation with radiological suspicion. Radiol Med 2007; 112: 304–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfarl, G, Helbich, TH, Riedl, CC, et al. Stereotactic 11-G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A validation study. Am J Radiol 2002; 179: 1503–7.Google Scholar
Schueller, G, Schueller-Weidekamm, C, Helbich, TH. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1761–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alonso-Bartolome, P, Vega-Bolivar, A, Torres-Tabanera, M, et al. Sonographically guided 11-G directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision: utility and cost study in probably benign lesions. Acta Radiol 2004; 45: 390–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettritz, U, Rotter, K, Schreer, I, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicentre study. Cancer 2003; 100: 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, SH, Burbank, F, Jackman, J, et al. Percutaneous Large-Core Breast Biopsy: A Multi-institutional Study. Radiology 1994; 3: 359–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, SH, Burbank, F. A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 1996; 200: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, SH, Dennis, MA, Stavros, AT, et al. A new breast biopsy technique. J Diag Med Sonogr 2006; 12: 113–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpotts, , Hooley, RJ, Lee, CH. Comparison of automated verses vacuum assisted methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. Am J Radiol 2003; 180: 347–51.Google Scholar
Lourenco, AP, Mainiero, MB, Lazarus, E, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189: W275–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellebrew, LK, Oneson, RH. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience. Breast J 2006; 12: 302–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Intact Medical Corporation. Percutaneous contiguous electrosurgical breast biopsy devices, 2008, www.intactmedical.com/pdf/ML087_Rev00.pdf.
Sie, A, Bryan, DC, Gaines, V, et al. Multi-center evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted intact-specimen breast biopsy device. Cancer 2006; 107: 945–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, MJ, Kim, EK, Lee, JY, et al. Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuum-assisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2376–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grady, I, Gorsuch, H, Wilburn-Bailey, S. Long-term outcome of benign fibroadenomas treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous excision. Breast J 2008; 14: 275–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carder, PJ, Khan, T, Burrows, P, et al. Large volume mammotome biopsy may reduce the need for diagnostic surgery in papillary lesions of the breast. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 928–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floery, D, Helbich, TH. MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: Materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. Magn Reson Imag Clin N Am 2006; 14: 411–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonaventure, T, Cormier, B, Lebas, P, et al. Benign papilloma: is US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy an alternative to surgical biopsy?J Radiol 2007; 88: 1165–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eby, PR, Ochsner, JE, DeMartini, WB, et al. Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy. Ann SurgOncol 2008; 15: 3232–8.Google Scholar
Carder, PJ, Khan, T, Burrows, P, et al. Large volume mammotome biopsy may reduce the need for diagnostic surgery in papillary lesions of the b reast. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 928–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgian-Smith, D, D'Orsi, C, Morris, E, et al. Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using an upright unit, a vacuum suction needle, and a lateral arm support. Am J Radiol 2002; 178: 1017–24.Google Scholar
Jackman, RJ, Marzoni, FA. Stereotactic histologic biopsy with patients prone: technical feasibility in 98% of mammographically detected lesions. Am J Radiol 2003; 180: 785–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, P, Morris, P, Ordidge, R, et al. Carcinoma of the breast imaged by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Brit J Radiol 1979; 52: 242–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, C. The current status of breast MR imaging Part 1. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer of clinical practice. Radiology 2007; 244: 356–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K-M, Kaplan, JB, Murray, MP, et al. Complete excision of the MRI target lesion at MRI-guided vacuum assisted biopsy of breast cancer. Am J Radiol 2008; 191: 1198–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Liberman, L, Bracero, N, Morris, E, et al. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. Am J Radiol 2005; 185: 183–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Bedrosian, I, Schlencker, J, Spitz, FR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9: 457–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, CK, Elevelt, A, Leutner, CC, et al. Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 1997, 204: 667–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lampe, D, Hefler, L, Alberich, T, et al. The clinical value of pre-operative wire localization of breast lesions by magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 75: 175–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, LF, Henry-Tillman, R, Mancino, AT, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle biopsy and needle localized excision of occult breast lesions. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 414–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, EA, Liberman, L, Dershaw, D, et al. Pre-operative MR image-guided needle localization of breast lesions. Am J Radiol 2002; 178: 1211–20.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Lehman, CD, Dee, KE. MRI guided breast biopsy: clinical experience with 14-gauge stainless steel core biopsy needle. Am J Radiol 2004; 182: 1075–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Daniel, BL, Birdwell, RL, Ikeda, DM, et al. Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique. Radiology 1998; 207: 455–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, CK, Morakkabati, N, Leutner, CC, et al. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 2001; 220: 31–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, JP, Schulz, T, Horn, LC, et al. MR-guided percutaneous core biopsy of small breast lesions: first experience with a vertically open 0.5T scanner. J Magn Reson Imag 2002; 15: 374–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghate, SV, Rosen, EL, Soo, MSC, et al. MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a handheld portable biopsy system. Am J Radiol 2006; 186: 1733–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Hauth, EA, Jaeger, HJ, Lubnau, J, et al. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a handheld biopsy system: clinical experience and results in postinterventional MR mammography after 24h. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 168–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, CD, DePeri, ER, Peacock, S, et al. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Radiol 2005; 184: 1782–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Liberman, L, Morris, EA, Dershaw, DD, et al. Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. Am J Radiol 2003; 181: 1283–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Liberman, L, Bracero, N, Morris, EA, et al. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Initial clinical experience. Am J Radiol 2005; 185: 183–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Orel, SG, Schnall, MD, Mies, CJ. MRI-compatible 12-G vacuum-assisted core-biopsy of suspicious enhancing lesions: preliminary experience. Radiology 2003; 493(P).Google Scholar
Perlet, C, Heinig, A, Prat, X, et al. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1463–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wald, DS, Weinreb, JC, Newstead, G, et al. MR-guided fine needle aspiration of breast lesions: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996, 20: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×