à Kempis, Thomas. The Imitation of Christ, trans. Sherley-Price, Leo. London: Penguin, 1952.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Ostwald, M.. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Politics and The Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful.” In The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, 12 vols. Boston: Little Brown, 1881, vol. II.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Reflections on the Revolution in France.” In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981–2000, vol. VIII.Google Scholar

Butler, Joseph. “Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel, vol. I.” In The Works of Bishop Butler, ed. Bernard, J. H.. 1726, 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1900.Google Scholar

Cicero, . De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cicero, . De Officiis, ed. Winterbottom, M., trans. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicero, . On Duties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres, 1991.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Discourse on the Method of Properly Conducting One's Reason and of Seeking the Truth in the Sciences, trans. Sutcliffe, F. E.. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Circles.” In Emerson: Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann. “Yet Another Philosophy of History for the Education of Humanity.” In Herder on Social and Political Culture, ed. and trans. Barnard, F. M.. Cambridge, 1969.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen (De Cive), ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Schneewind, J. B.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Hume, David. Political Essays, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. “Reflections on the Common Systems of Morality” and “Inaugural Lecture on the Social Nature of Man.” In Francis Hutcheson, Two texts on human nature, ed. Mautner, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. “Reflections upon Laughter and Remarks upon the ‘Fable of the Bees.’” In Collected Works of Francis Hutcheson, 7 vols. Hildesheim: G. Olds, 1971. Vol. 7: Opera Minora, pp. 144–156.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?,” trans. Nisbet, H. B.. In Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 54–60.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1929.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “The Metaphysics of Morals, Part II: Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Virtue.” In Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 509–603.Google Scholar

Leslie, T. E. Cliffe. “The Political Economy of Adam Smith,” Fortnightly Review, November 1, 1870, p. 12.

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960–1992, pp. 265–428.Google Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, ed. Kaye, F. B.. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924; reprint ed. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Aurelius, Marcus, Meditations, ed. and trans. Haines, C. R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1916.Google Scholar

Aurelius, Marcus, The Meditations, trans. Grube, G. M. A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. “Preface” to Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. In Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, ed. Feuer, Lewis S.. New York: Anchor, 1959, pp. 133–146.Google Scholar

Millar, John. An Historical View of the English Government (1803). 4 vols. London, 1812.Google Scholar

Montaigne, Michel. The Complete Essays of Montaigne, trans. Frame, Donald M.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Nicole, Pierre. “De la charité et de l'amour-propre.” In Oeuvres philosophiques et morales de Nicole, comprenant un choix de ses essais, ed. Jourdain, Charles. Paris: L. Hachette, 1845, trans. Forster, Elborg, “Of Charity and Self-Love.” In Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology. 2 vols., ed. Schneewind, J. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, vol. I, pp. 370–387.Google Scholar

Pascal, Blaise. Penseés, trans. Trotter, W. F.. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1958.Google Scholar

Plato, . Republic, trans. Grube, G. M. A, ed. Reeve, C. D. C.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar

Plato, . Phaedo, ed. Rowe, C. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel. De iure naturae et gentium libri octo, ed. Brown, J. S., trans. , C. H. and Oldfather, W. A.. Oxford, 1934.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Basic Political Writings, trans. Cress, Donald A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987, pp. 23–109.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Considérations sur le gouvernement de Pologne et sur sa réformation projettée. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Œuvres complètes. 4 vols., ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1966, vol. III, pp. 951–1041.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Du Contrat Social; ou, principes de droit politique, Œuvres complètes. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Œuvres complètes. 4 vols., ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1966, vol. III, pp. 347–470.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur les sciences et les arts. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Œuvres complètes. 4 vols., ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1966, vol. III, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l'origine et les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Œuvres complètes. 4 vols., ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1966, vol. III, pp. 109–223.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Fragments politiques. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Œuvres complètes. 4 vols., ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1966, vol. III, pp. 469–560.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Lettre à M. D'Alembert sur son Article Genève, ed. Launay, Michel. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1967.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Projet de constitution pour la Corse. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Œuvres complètes. 4 vols., ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1966, vol. III, pp. 899–950.Google Scholar

Seneca, , “De Beneficiis.” In Moral Essays, vol. III, ed. and trans. Basore, John. Cambridge, MA, 1928.Google Scholar

Seneca, , Epistulae Morales, ed. Reynolds, L. D.. Oxford, 1965, trans. Robin Campbell, Letters from a Stoic. New York, 1969.Google Scholar

Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, the third Earl of. “Soliloquy or Advice to an Author.” In Characteristics of Men, Manner, Opinions, Times, etc. 2 vols., ed. Robertson, John M.. Gloucester, MA, 1963, 1:121. Reprint Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology. 2 vols., ed. J. B. Schneewind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, vol. I, pp. 486–488.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Correspondence of Adam Smith, ed. Mossner, Ernest Campbell and Ross, Ian Simpson, as vol. VI of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977; reprint Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. Essays on Philosophical Subjects, ed. Wightman, W. L. D., as vol. III of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977; reprint Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), ed. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S., as vol. II of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977; reprint Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. Lectures on Jurisprudence (1762–1766), ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D. and Stein, P. G., as vol. V of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977; reprint Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), ed. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L., as vol. I of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977; reprint Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Abdel-Nour, Farid. “An International Ethics of Evil?” International Relations, vol. 18, no. 4 (2004), pp. 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrams, M. H.Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1971.Google Scholar

Anderson, Amanda. The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Andrew, Edward G. “Anarchic Conscience and Enlightenment Reason.” In Philosophical Designs for a Socio-Cultural Transformation, ed. Yamamoto, Tutsuju. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Culturelles and Rowman & Littlefield, 1998, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar

Andrew, Edward G.Conscience and Its Critics: Protestant Conscience, Enlightenment Reason, and Modern Subjectivity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annas, Julia. The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Archibugi, Daniele, and Held, David, eds. Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.

Archibugi, Daniele, and Held, David, eds. Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso, 2003.

Arendt, Hannah. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press, 1960; reprint New York: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. and ed. Trask, Willard R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael. Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Ball, Terence, Farr, James and Hanson, Russell L., eds. Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Barber, Benjamin R.Jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World. New York: Ballantine Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. “International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective.” In International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, ed. Mapel, David R. and Nardin, Terry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998, pp. 144–163.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C.The Sovereignty of Reason: The Defense of Rationality in the Early English Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beitz, Charles. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bénichou, Paul. Man and Ethics: Studies in French Classicism (Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1948), trans. and ed. Hughes, Elizabeth. New York: Anchor, 1971.Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, Ashley, Brereton, Cloudesley, Carter, W. Horsfall. New York: Doubleday, 1956.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Five Essays on Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Vico and Herder. London, 1980.Google Scholar

Berry, Christopher. Hume, Hegel and Human Nature. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, Christopher. The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, Christopher. Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Berry, Christopher. “Sociality and Socialisation.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Broadie, Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettelheim, Bruno. “Remarks on the Psychological Appeal of Totalitarianism.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 12, October (1952), pp. 89–96. Reprint Bruno Bettelheim, Surviving and Other Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979, pp. 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, Marc. The Historian's Craft, trans. Putnam, Peter. New York: Vintage, 1953.Google Scholar

Blom, Hans W., and Winkel, Laurens C., eds. Grotius and the Stoa. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2004.

Boltanski, Luc. Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonar, James, ed. A Catalogue of the Library of Adam Smith, Author of the “Moral Sentiments” and “The Wealth of Nations.”New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1966.

Breckenridge, Carol A., Pollock, Sheldon, Bhabha, Homi K. and Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Cosmopolitanism.” Public Culture, vol. 12, no. 3 (2000).Google Scholar

Brown, Vivienne. Adam Smith's Discourse: Canonicity, Commerce and Conscience. London, 1994.Google Scholar

Brown, Vivienne. “Dialogism, the Gaze and the Emergence of Economic Discourse.” New Literary History, vol. 28, no. 4 (1997), pp. 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brubaker, Lauren. “‘A Particular Turn or Habit of the Imagination’: Adam Smith on Love, Friendship and Philosophy.” In Love and Friendship: Rethinking Politics and Affection in Modern Times, ed. Velasquez, Eduardo. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2003, pp. 229–262.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Lauren. “Does the ‘Wisdom of Nature’ Need Help?” In New Voices on Adam Smith, eds. Montes, Leonidas and Schliesser, Eric. London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 168–192.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin, “The Question to the Single One.” In Between Man and Man, trans. Smith, Ronald Gregor. Glasgow: Collins, 1979, pp. 60–108.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin, Tales of the Hasidim. New York: Schocken, 1957.Google Scholar

Burtt, Shelley. Virtue Transformed: Political Argument in England, 1688–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Judith. “‘Conscience Doth Make Subjects of Us All.’” Yale French Studies, no. 88 (1995), pp. 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, David, and Shapiro, Michael J., eds. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

Campbell, T. D.Adam Smith's Science of Morals. London: Allen & Unwin, 1971.Google Scholar

Caputo, John. Against Ethics: Contributions to a Poetics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, trans. Koelln, Fritz C. A. and Pettegrove, James P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “Mandeville Moralized.” Annali della Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, vol. 17 (1983), pp. 239–290.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “Considering Things Minutely: Reflections on Mandeville and the Eighteenth-Century Science of Man.” History of Political Thought, vol. 7 (1986), pp. 463–488.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “Excess, Frugality and the Spirit of Capitalism: Readings of Mandeville on Commercial Society.” In Culture in History: Production, Consumption and Values in Historical Perspective, ed. Melling, Joseph and Barry, Jonathan. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1992, pp. 155–179.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969–1976.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Margaret. “The Oceanic Circle.” In Gandhi's Diagnostic Approach Rethought: Exploring a Perspective on His Life and Work. New Delhi: Promilla and Co. and Bibliophile South Asia, 2007, pp. 148–174.Google Scholar

Cheah, Pheng, and Robbins, Bruce, eds. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.

Chong, Kim-chong, Tan, Sor-hoon and Ten, C. L., eds. The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches. Peru, IL: Open Court, 1993.

Clark, Henry C. “Conversation and Moderate Virtue in Adam Smith's ‘Theory of Moral Sentiments.’” Review of Politics, vol. 54, no. 2 (1992), pp. 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, P. H. “Adam Smith and the Stoics: The Influence of Marcus Aurelius.” University of the West of England, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Working Papers in Economics No. 18, April 1996.

Clarke, P. H. “Adam Smith, Stoicism and Religion in the 18th Century.” History of the Human Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4 (2000), pp. 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, P. H. “Unity in the Influences on Adam Smith.” History of Economics Review, vol. 26 (2002), pp. 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua, ed. For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism. Boston: Beacon, 1996.

Coles, Romand. Rethinking Generosity: Critical Theory and the Politics of Caritas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Colletti, Lucio. “Mandeville, Rousseau and Smith.” In From Rousseau to Lenin: Studies in Ideology and Society, trans. Merrington, John and White, Judith. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972, pp. 195–216.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G.The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946–1980.Google Scholar

Connolly, William E. “Suffering, Justice, and the Politics of Becoming.” In Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Connolly, William E.Why I Am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Connolly, William E. “Eccentric Flows and Cosmopolitan Culture.” In Connolly, William E., Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002, pp. 177–201.Google Scholar

Cooper, John M. “Eudaimonism, Nature, and ‘Moral Duty’ in Stoicism.” In Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, ed. Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 261–284.Google Scholar

Cremaschi, Sergio V. “Adam Smith: Skeptical Newtonianism, Disenchanted Republicanism, and the Birth of Social Science.” In Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies in the Relationship between Epistemology and Political Philosophy, ed. Dascal, Marcelo and Gruengard, Ora. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar

Cropsey, Joseph. Polity and Economy: An Interpretation of the Principles of Adam Smith. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropsey, Joseph. “Adam Smith.” In History of Political Philosophy, ed. Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963, pp. 607–630.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. Impartial Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought”: 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. “Empathy, Sympathy, Care.” Philosophical Studies, vol. 89 (1998), pp. 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. “Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent Work on Adam Smith.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2 (1999), pp. 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. “Equal Dignity in Adam Smith.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 1 (2004), pp. 129–134.Google Scholar

Davidovich, Lucy S.A Holocaust Reader. New York: Behrman House, 1976.Google Scholar

Waal, Alex. “The Humanitarian Juggernaut.” London Review of Books, June 22, 1995.

Uyl, Douglas, and Griswold, Charles L.. “Adam Smith on Friendship and Love.” Review of Metaphysics, vol. 49, March, pp. 609–637.

Dennett, Daniel C. “Why You Can't Make a Computer That Feels Pain.” In Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Hassocks: Harvester, 1979, pp. 190–229.Google Scholar

Derathé, Robert. Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1950.Google Scholar

des Jardins, Gregory. “Terms of De Officiis in Hume and Kant.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 28 (1967), pp. 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickey, Laurence W. “Historicizing the ‘Adam Smith Problem’: Conceptual, Historiographical, and Textual Issues.” Journal of Modern History, vol. 58, September (1986), pp. 579–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickey, Laurence W. “Pride, Hypocrisy and Civility in Mandeville's Social and Historical Theory.” Critical Review, Summer 1990, pp. 387–431.

Dickey, Laurence W. “Appendices I–IV.” In Smith, Adam, An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Dickey, Laurence W.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993, pp. 213–263.Google Scholar

Dickey, Laurence W. “Doux-Commerce and Humanitarian Values: Free Trade, Sociability and Universal Benevolence in Eighteenth-Century Thinking.” In Grotius and the Stoa, ed. Blom, Hans W. and Winkel, Laurence C.. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2004, pp. 271–318.Google Scholar

Dufour, Alfred. “Pufendorf.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 561–588.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. From Mandeville to Marx: The Genesis and Triumph of Economic Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. “Democracy Unretrieved, or the Political Theory of Professor Macpherson.” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 4, no. 4 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, John. “From Applied Theology to Social Analysis: The Break between John Locke and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Dunn, John, Rethinking Modern Political Theory, Essays 1979–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. “Invidious Sympathy in the Theory of Moral Sentiments,” Adam Smith Review, vol. 2 (2006), pp. 98–123.Google Scholar

Dwyer, John. “Theory and Discourse: The 6th Edition of The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” In Virtuous Discourse: Sensibility and Community in Late Eighteenth-Century Scotland. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers, 1987, pp. 168–185.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. Letter of 1950. Cited in the New York Times, March 29, 1972.

Elster, Jon, ed. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Discovering the Good: Oikeiōsis and Kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics.” In The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986; and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme, 1986, pp. 145–183.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. The Stoic Theory of Oikeiōsis. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Evensky, Jerry. Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. “Supererogation and Rules.” In Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar

Fitzgibbons, Athol. Adam Smith's System of Liberty, Wealth and Virtue: The Moral and Political Foundations of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. “Philosophy in Moral Practice: Kant and Adam Smith.” Kant-Studien, vol. 82 (1991), pp. 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. Integrity and Moral Relativism. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. The Ethics of Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgement and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. On Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. “Smith und der Kulturrelativismus.” In Adam Smith als Moralphilosoph, ed. Fricke, Christel and Schütt, Hans-Peter. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2005 (trans. as “Smith and Cultural Relativism”).Google Scholar

Foley, Vernard. The Social Physics of Adam Smith. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Forbes, Duncan. “Natural Law and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishing Ltd, 1982, pp. 186–204.Google Scholar

Force, Pierre. Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai. Book review of Charles Griswold, Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Political Theory, vol. 28, no. 1 (2000), pp. 122–130.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “Whose Justice? Which Impartiality?: Reflections on Griswold's Smith.” Perspectives on Political Science, vol. 30, no. 3 (2001), pp. 146–150.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “Adam Smith as Globalization Theorist.” Critical Review, vol. 14, no. 4 (2002), pp. 391–419.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “The Emergence of Contextualism in Rousseau's Political Thought: The Case of Parisian Theatre in the Lettre à d'Alembert.” History of Political Thought, vol. 24, no 3 (2003), pp. 435–463.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “And Thus Spoke the Spectator: Adam Smith for Humanitarians: On Luc Boltanski, Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics (Cambridge 1999),” Adam Smith Review, vol. 1, Fall (2004), pp. 167–174.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “Sympathy in Space(s): Adam Smith on Proximity.” Political Theory, vol. 33, no. 2 (2005), pp. 189–217.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “Smith on ‘Connexion’, Culture and Judgment.” In New Voices on Adam Smith, ed. Montes, Leonidas and Schliesser, Eric. London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, Book review of Jennifer Pitts, A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005. In Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 2 (2007), pp. 265–267.Google Scholar

Fonna, Forman-Barzilai, “Adam Smith.” In Sage Encyclopedia of Political Theory, ed. Bevir, Mark. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, forthcoming.

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents, trans. and ed. Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton, 1961.Google Scholar

Friedländer, Saul. Reflections of Nazism: An Essay on Kitsch and Death. New York: Harper & Row, 1984.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Fries, Thomas. “Dialog und Soliloquium.” In Dialog der Aufklärung, Shaftesbury, Rousseau, Solger. Tübingen: Francke Verlag, 1993, pp. 49–97.Google Scholar

Galston, William A. “Cosmopolitan Altruism.” In Altruism, ed. Paul, Ellen Frankel, Miller, Fred D., Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 118–134.Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John. Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Politics from the Restoration to the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. “The Uses of Diversity,” Michigan Quarterly Review, vol. 25 (1986), pp. 105–123.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. Runaway World. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, M. M.Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville's Social and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Gordon, Daniel. Citizens Without Sovereignty: Equality and Sociability in French Thought, 1670–1789. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gray, John. Enlightenment's Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, John. Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Green, Lewis F.Chronicle into History: An Essay on the Interpretation of History in Florentine Fourteenth-Century Chronicles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Griswold, Charles L., Jr. “Rhetoric and Ethics: Adam Smith on Theorizing about the Moral Sentiments.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 24, no. 3 (1991), pp. 213–237.Google Scholar

Griswold, Charles L., Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Griswold, Charles L., “Reply to My Critics.” Perspectives on Political Science, vol. 30, no 3 (2001), pp. 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griswold, Charles L., “Imagination: Morals, Science, and Arts.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 22–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griswold, Charles L., “On the Incompleteness of Adam Smith's System.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 2 (2006), pp. 181–186.Google Scholar

Griswold, Charles L., Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunn, J. A. W.Politics and the Public Interest in the Seventeenth Century. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ed. Traditions of Liberalism: Essays on John Locke, Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill. Sydney: Center for Independent Studies, 1988.

Haakonssen, Knud. “Natural Law and Moral Realism: The Scottish Synthesis.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Stewart, M. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, pp. 61–85.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ed. Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ed. “Introduction.” In Smith, Adam, Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. vii–xxiv.CrossRef

Haakonssen, Knud. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRef

Haakonssen, Knud, and Winch, Donald. “The Legacy of Adam Smith.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 366–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. Morality and Conflict. Cambridge, MA, 1983.Google Scholar

Hanley, Ryan. “Adam Smith, Aristotle and Virtue Ethics.” In New Voices on Adam Smith, ed. Montes, Leonidas and Schliesser, Eric. London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar

Hanley, Ryan. “Commerce and Corruption: Rousseau's Diagnosis, Adam Smith's Cure.” European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 7, no. 2 (2008), pp. 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harkin, Maureen. “Adam Smith's Missing History: Primitives, Progress and Problems of Genre.” English Literary History, vol. 72 (2005), pp. 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A.. Individualism and the Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Heath, Eugene. “The Commerce of Sympathy: Adam Smith on the Emergence of Morals.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 3 (1995), pp. 447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heilbronner, Robert L. “The Wonderful World of Adam Smith.” In The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1953, pp. 40–72.Google Scholar

Heise, Paul A. “Stoicism in Adam Smith's Model of Human Behavior: The Philosophical Foundations of Self-Betterment and the Invisible Hand.” Oekonomie und Gesellschaft: Adam Smith's Beitrag zur Gesellschaftswissenshaft, vol. 9 (1991), pp. 64–78.Google Scholar

Heise, Paul A. “Stoicism in the EPS: The Foundations of Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy.” Perspectives in the History of Economic Thought, vol. 11 (1995), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar

Held, David. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Held, David, and McGrew, Tony, eds. Governing Globalization. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.

Heyd, David. Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Hill, Lisa. “The Hidden Theology of Adam Smith.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 8, no. 1 (2001), pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Lisa. “Adam Smith and the Theme of Corruption.” Review of Politics, vol. 68 (2006), pp. 636–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Lisa, and McCarthy, Peter. “On Friendship and Necessitudo in Adam Smith.” History of the Human Sciences, vol. 17, no. 4 (2004), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. “Rival Views of Market Society.” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, December (1982). Reprint Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 105–141.Google Scholar

Hollinger, David. “How Wide Is the Circle of the ‘We’?,” American Historical Review, vol. 98, no. 2 (1993), pp. 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollinger, David. “Not Universalists, Not Pluralists: The New Cosmopolitans Find Their Own Way.” In Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice, ed. Vertovec, Steven and Cohen, Robin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 227–239.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin. The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “The Secret History of Self-Interest.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 267–286.Google Scholar

Honig, Bonnie. “Another Cosmopolitanism?” In Another Cosmopolitanism, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 102–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hont, Istvan. “‘The Rich-Country – Poor-Country’ Debate in Scottish Classical Political Economy.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 271–315.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan. “The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samue Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the ‘Four-Stages Theory.’” In The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. Pagden, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hont, Istvan. “Free Trade and the Economic Limits to National Politics: Neo-Machiavellian Political Economy Reconsidered.” In The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, ed. Dunn, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 41–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hont, Istvan. “The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: ‘Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State’ in Historical Perspective.” In Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State?, ed. Dunn, John. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995, pp. 166–231.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan, and Ignatieff, Michael, eds. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Hope, Vincent. “Smith's Demigod.” In Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hope, Vincent. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984, pp. 157–167.Google Scholar

Hope, Vincent. Virtue by Consensus: The Moral Philosophy of Hutcheson, Hume and Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Horne, Thomas. “Envy and Commercial Society: Mandeville and Smith on ‘Private Vices, Public Benefits.’” Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 4 (1981), pp. 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hundert, E. J. The Enlightenment's Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurka, Thomas. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Terence. Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy, 1662–1776. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael. “Smith, Rousseau and the Republic of Needs.” In Scotland and Europe, 1200–1850, ed. Smout, T. C.. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers, 1986, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael. The Needs of Strangers. London: Chatto & Windus, 1984; reprint London: Hogarth Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael. Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism. New York: Noonday, 1993.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad. “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, vol. 2, pp. 151–183.Google Scholar

Jardins, Gregory des. “Terms of De Officiis in Hume and Kant.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 28 (1967).Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Jones, Deiniol. “The Origins of the Global City: Ethics and Morality in Contemporary Cosmopolitanism.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 5, no. 1 (2003), pp. 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Justman, Stuart. The Autonomous Male of Adam Smith. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas, and Katznelson, Ira, “The Rhetoric of the Market: Adam Smith on Recognition, Speech and Exchange.” Review of Politics, vol. 63, no. 3 (2001), pp. 549–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Gavin. Adam Smith's Lost Legacy. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Nannerl O. Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidd, I. G. “Stoic Intermediates and the End for Man.” In Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: Athlone Press, 1971, pp. 150–172.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca. “The Political Relevance of the Emotions from Descartes to Smith.” In Bringing the Passions Back In: The Emotions in Political Philosophy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca and Ferry, Leonard. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2008, pp. 108–125.Google Scholar

Kleer, Richard. “Final Causes in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 2 (1995), pp. 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleer, Richard. “The Role of Teleology in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations,” History of Economics Review, vol. 31 (2000), pp. 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Lawrence E. Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinig, John. “Butler in a Cool Hour.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 7 (1969), pp. 399–411.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1979; trans. and ed. Tribe, Keith. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard. The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Kuiper, Edith. “The Construction of Masculine Identity in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.” In Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, ed. Barker, Drucilla K. and Kuiper, Edith. London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuiper, Edith. “Adam Smith and His Feminist Contemporaries.” In New Voices on Adam Smith, ed. Montes, Leonidas, and Schliesser, Eric. London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 3–60.Google Scholar

Kwok-Bun, Chan. “Both Sides, Now: Culture Contact, Hybridization and Cosmopolitanism.” In Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice, ed. Vertovec, Steven and Cohen, Robin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 191–208.Google Scholar

LaCapra, Dominick. “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts.” In Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals & New Perspectives, ed. LaCapra, Dominick and Kaplan, Steven L.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982, pp. 47–85.Google Scholar

Lamb, Robert Boyden. “Adam Smith's System: Sympathy Not Self-Interest.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35 (1974), pp. 671–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larmore, Charles E. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larmore, Charles E. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. “Transcendental Anthropology.” In Subject, Thought, and Context, ed. Pettit, Philip and McDowell, John. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986, pp. 267–298.Google Scholar

Lecky, W. E. H. History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne. New York: George Braziller, 1955, vols. I and II.Google Scholar

Leslie, T. E. Cliffe. “The Political Economy of Adam Smith,” Fortnightly Review, November 1, 180.

Levi, Anthony. French Moralists: The Theory of the Passions, 1585–1659. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. “Adam Smith and His Sources: The Evil of Independence.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 4 (2008), pp. 57–87.Google Scholar

Lomonaco, Jeffrey. “Adam Smith's ‘Letter to the Authors of the Edinburgh Review.’” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 64, no. 4 (2002), pp. 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. 2nd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N, eds. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Lovejoy, Arthur O. “The Supposed Primitivism of Rousseau's ‘Discourse on Inequality.’” Modern Philology, vol. 21 (1923).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovejoy, Arthur O. Reflections on Human Nature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl. Meaning in History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven. “On Trade-offs between Values.” European University Institute Working Papers in Political and Social Sciences, No. 92–94 (1992).

Macfie, A. L. The Individual in Society. London: Allen & Unwin, 1967.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. Book review of D. Winch, Adam Smith's Politics. In History of Political Economy, vol. 11 (1979), pp. 450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madsen, Richard, and Strong, Tracy B.. The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Mapel, David R., and Nardin, Terry, eds. International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.

Markell, Patchen. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Marshall, David. “Adam Smith and the Theatricality of Moral Sentiments.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 10, June (1984), pp. 592–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, David. “Adam Smith and the Theatricality of Moral Sentiments.” In Marshall, David, The Figure of Theatre: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950; reprint London: Pluto, 1992.Google Scholar

McDonough, Kenneth. “Cultural Recognition, Cosmopolitanism and Multicultural Education.” In Philosophy of Education 1997, ed. Stone, L.. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, 1998.Google Scholar

McDonough, Kevin, and Feinberg, Walter, eds. Citizenship and Education in Liberal-Democratic Societies: Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values, and Collective Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

McKenna, Stephen J. Adam Smith: The Rhetoric of Propriety. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.Google Scholar

McLean, Iain. Adam Smith: Radical and Egalitarian: An Interpretation for the 21st Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

McNamara, Peter. Political Economy and Statesmanship: Smith, Hamilton, and the Foundation of the Commercial Republic. Dekalb: University of Illinois Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. “Adam Smith and the Chicago School.” In The Elgar Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Young, Jeffrey. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming 2009.Google Scholar

Mehta, Pratap Banhu. “Self-Interest and Other Interests.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehta, Uday Singh. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Miller, David. “The Resurgence of Political Theory.” Political Studies, vol. 38 (1990), pp. 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, David, and Walzer, Michael, eds. Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRef

Minowitz, Peter. Profits, Priests, and Princes: Adam Smith's Emancipation of Economics from Politics and Religion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Harvey. “The Mysterious Veil of Self-Delusion in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 20 (1987), pp. 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montes, Leonidas. Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montes, Leonidas, “Adam Smith as an Eclectic Stoic.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 4 (2008), forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montes, Leonidas, and Schliesser, Eric, eds. New Voices on Adam Smith. London: Routledge, 2006.

Moon, J. Donald. Constructing Community: Moral Pluralism and Tragic Conflicts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Morrow, Glenn R.The Ethical and Economic Theories of Adam Smith. New York, 1923; reprint New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1973.Google Scholar

Morrow, Glenn R. “The Significance of the Doctrine of Sympathy in Hume and Adam Smith.” Philosophical Review, vol. 32, no. 1 (1923), pp. 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, Jerry Z.Adam Smith in His Time, and Ours: Designing the Decent Society. New York: Free Press, 1993; Reprint Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. “Adam Smith's Critique of International Trading Companies: Theorizing ‘Globalization’ in the Age of Enlightenment.” Political Theory, vol. 36, no. 2 (2008), pp. 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, Milton L. “Adam Smith as Critic of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 32, no. 2 (1975), pp. 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, Milton L.The Soul of Modern Economic Man: Ideas of Self-Interest, from Thomas Hobbes to Adam Smith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Mayerfield, Jamie. Suffering and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Neili, Russell. “Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 47, no. 4 (1986), pp. 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, Helen. Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. “Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism.” Journal of Political Philosophy (1995).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon, 1995.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. “Compassion: The Basic Social Emotion.” Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 13 (1996), pp. 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. ed. For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism. Boston: Beacon, 1996.

Nussbaum, Martha C.Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. “‘Mutilated and Deformed’: Adam Smith on the Material Basis of Human Dignity.” In Nussbaum, Martha, The Cosmopolitan Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, forthcoming.

Nussbaum, Martha C., and Sen, Amartya, eds. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.CrossRef

Nussbaum, Martha C., et al. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism.” Boston Review, October/November 1994.

Nygren, Anders. Eros and Agape. London: SPCK, 1954.Google Scholar

Otteson, James R. “Adam Smith on the Emergence of Morals: A Reply to Eugene Heath.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 3 (2000), pp. 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otteson, James R.Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otteson, James R. “Shaftesbury's Evolutionary Morality and Its Influence on Adam Smith.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 4 (2008), forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. Lords of All the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain, and France, c.1500–c.1800. New Haven, CT, 1995.Google Scholar

Page, James. Peace Education: Exploring Ethical and Philosophical Foundations. New York: Information Age Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar

Penelhum, Terence. Butler. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar

Peters, John Durham. “Publicity and Pain: Self-Abstraction in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments,” Public Culture, vol. 7 (1995), pp. 657–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip. “A Sensible Perspectivism.” In Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity, ed. Maria, Baghramian, and Ingram, Attracta. London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 60–82.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Nicholas. “Adam Smith as Civic Moralist.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan, and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Nicholas. “Politics and Politeness in the Reigns of Anne and the Early Hanoverians.” In The Varieties of British Political Thought, 1500–1800, ed. Pocock, J. G. A. with Schochet, Gordon J. and Schwoerer, Lois G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 211–245.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Political Works of James Harrington. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “Authority and Property: The Question of Liberal Origins.” In After the Reformation: Essays in Honor of J. H. Hexter, ed. Malament, Barbara C.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1980, pp. 331–354.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “Cambridge Paradigms and Scotch Philosophers: A Study of the Relations between the Civic Humanist and Civil Jurisprudential Interpretation of Eighteenth-Century Social Thought.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “Time Institutions and Action: An Essay on Traditions and Their Understanding.” In Pocock, J. G. A., Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 233–272.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “Political Thought in the English-Speaking Atlantic, 1760–1790, Part 2: Empire, Revolution and the End of Early Modernity.” In The Varieties of British Political Thought, 1500–1800, ed. Pocock, J. G. A. with Schochet, Gordon J. and Schwoerer, Lois G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 283–317.Google Scholar

Portman, John. When Bad Things Happen to Other People. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Radner, John B. “The Art of Sympathy in Eighteenth-Century British Moral Thought.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, vol. 9 (1980), pp. 189–210.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D.The Moral Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D. “Bishop Butler's View of Conscience.” Philosophy, vol. 24 (1949), pp. 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raphael, D. D. ed. British Moralists 1650–1800, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969; reprint Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1991.

Raphael, D. D. “Hume and Adam Smith on Justice and Utility.” In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. London: Methuen & Co., 1972/73. New Series, vol. 73, pp. 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raphael, D. D. “The Impartial Spectator.” In Essays on Adam Smith, ed. Skinner, Andrew S. and Wilson, Thomas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D.Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D.Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D. “Adam Smith 1790: The Man Recalled, the Philosopher Revived.” In Adam Smith Reviewed, ed. Jones, Peter and Skinner, Andrew. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992, pp. 93–118.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D.The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasmussen, Dennis. “Rousseau's ‘Philosophical Chemistry’ and the Foundations of Adam Smith's Thought.” History of Political Thought, vol. 27, no. 4 (2006), pp. 620–641.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Dennis. The Problems and Promise of Commercial Society: Adam Smith's Response to Rousseau. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Dennis. “Whose Impartiality? Which Self-Interest?: Adam Smith on Utility, Happiness and Cultural Relativism.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 4 (2008), pp. 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Raynor, David. “Hume's Abstract of Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 22 (1984), pp. 52–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, Alan, and Bondanella, Julia Conaway, eds. Rousseau's Political Writings. New York: W. W. Norton, 1988.

Robbins, Bruce. Feeling Global: Internationalism in Distress. New York: New York University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Robertson, John. The Scottish Enlightenment and the Militia Issue. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar

Robertson, John. “The Scottish Enlightenment at the Limits of the Civic Tradition.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 137–179.Google Scholar

Robertson, John. ed. A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the Union of 1707. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Robin, Corey. Fear: The History of a Political Idea. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rorty, Amélie Oskenberg. “Butler on Benevolence and Conscience.” Philosophy, vol. 53 (1978), pp. 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Amélie Oskenberg. “Akrasia and Pleasure.” In Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, ed. Rorty. Berkeley, Amélie O., CA: University of California Press, 1980, pp. 267–284.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard. “Justice as a Larger Loyalty.” In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation, ed. Cheah, Pheng and Robbins, Bruce. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar

Ross, Ian Simpson. The Life of Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Ian Simpson, “‘Great Works upon the Anvil’ in 1785: Adam Smith's Projected Corpus of Philosophy.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 1 (2004), pp. 40–59.Google Scholar

Rothkrug, Lionel. Opposition to Louis XIV: The Political and Social Origin of the French Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothschild, Emma. “Adam Smith and Conservative Economics.” Economic History Review, vol. 45 (1992), pp. 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothschild, Emma. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Emma. “Dignity or Meanness.” Adam Smith Review, vol. I (2004), pp. 150–164.Google Scholar

Saint-Amand, Pierre. The Laws of Hostility: Politics, Violence, and the Enlightenment, trans. Curtiss Gage, Jennifer. Paris, 1992; Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Tatsuya, and Tanaka, Hideo, eds. The Rise of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. London: Routledge, 2003.

Sandbach, F. H.The Stoics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1975, 1994.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory, vol. 12, no. 1 (1984), pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness, trans. Barnes, Hazel E.. New York: Philosophical Library, 1956.Google Scholar

Schlereth, Thomas J.The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Schliesser, Eric. “The Obituary of a Vain Philosopher: Adam Smith's Reflections on Hume's Life.” Hume Studies, vol. 29, no. 2 (2003), pp. 327–362.Google Scholar

Schliesser, Eric. “Adam Smith's Benevolent and Self-Interested Conception of Philosophy.” In New Voices on Adam Smith, ed. Montes, Leonidas, and Schliesser, Eric. London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 328–357.Google Scholar

Schliesser, Eric. “Articulating Practices as Reasons: Adam Smith on the Social Conditions of Possibility of Property.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 2 (2006), pp. 69–97.Google Scholar

Schliesser, Eric, and Pack, Spencer. “Adam Smith's ‘Humean’ Criticism of Hume's Account of the Origin of Justice.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 44, no. 1 (2006), pp. 47–63.Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B. “The Divine Corporation and the History of Ethics.” In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, ed. Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneewind, J. B.The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Schofield, Malcolm. The Stoic Idea of the City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991–1999.Google Scholar

Schumacher, Millard. “Rights, Duties, and Supererogation.” PhD thesis, Queen's University, Ontario, 1970.

Schumpeter, Joseph. History of Economic Analysis. London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1954.Google Scholar

Sekora, John. Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollett. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “Open and Closed Impartiality.” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, no. 9 (2002), pp. 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. Reading “Adam Smith”: Desire, History and Value. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. “The Ethics of Encounter: Unreading, Unmapping the Imperium.” In Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics, ed. Campbell, David, and Shapiro, Michael J.. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999, pp. 57–91.Google Scholar

Shaver, Robert. “Virtues, Utility, and Rules.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sher, Richard B. Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. “Facing up to Intellectual Pluralism.” In Political Theory and Social Change, ed. Spitz, David. New York: Atherton Press, 1967, pp. 275–295.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. “Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy. Cambridge, MA, 1989, pp. 21–39; reprint Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Stanley Hoffman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. “Giving Injustice Its Due.” Yale Law Journal, vol. 98, April (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. Faces of Injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. “Obligation, Loyalty and Exile.” In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Hoffman, Stanley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 38–55.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N. “The Bonds of Exile.” In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Hoffman, Stanley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 56–72.Google Scholar

Silver, Allan. “Friendship in Commercial Society: Eighteenth-Century Social Theory and Modern Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 30 (1990), pp. 274–297.Google Scholar

Silver, Allan. “‘Two Different Sorts of Commerce’ – Friendship and Strangership in Civil Society.” In Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, ed. Weintraub, Jeff and Kumar, Krishan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997, pp. 43–74.Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1981.Google Scholar

Skinner, Andrew S. A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Hobbes' Leviathan.” Historical Journal, vol. 7 (1964), pp. 321–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory, vol. 8 (1969), pp. 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University, Press, 1978, vols. I and II.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives.” In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, ed. Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “The Paradoxes of Political Liberty.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 1986, vol. VII, pp. 227–250.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “A Reply to My Critics.” InMeaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, ed. Tully, James. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Rhetoric and the Constitution of Reality.” Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 76 (1990), pp. 1–63.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 293–309.Google Scholar

Smith, Craig. Adam Smith's Political Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Smith, David. “How Far Should We Care? On the Spatial Scope of Beneficence.” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 22, no. 1 (1998), pp. 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. “The Two Faces of Adam Smith.” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 65, no. 1 (1998), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomon, Robert C.A Passion for Justice: Emotions and the Origins of the Social Contract. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean. Blessings in Disguise; or, The Morality of Evil, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989, 1993.Google Scholar

Stewart, Dugald. Biographical Memoirs of Adam Smith, of William Robertson, and of Thomas Reid. Edinburgh: George Ramsay and Company, 1811.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. A. “The Stoic Legacy in the Early Scottish Enlightenment.” In Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought, ed. Osler, Margaret J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart-Robertson, J. C. “Cicero among the Shadows: Scottish Prelections of Virtue and Duty.” Rivista critica storia della filosofia, vol. I (1983), pp. 25–49.

Stigler, George. “Smith's Travels on the Ship of State.” History of Political Economy, vol. 3 (1971), pp. 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stocker, Michael. Plural and Conflicting Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stout, Jeffrey. Ethics after Babel: The Languages of Morals and Their Discontents. Boston: Beacon, 1988.Google Scholar

Striker, Gisela. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Charles. “The Diversity of Goods.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers II, ed. Taylor, Charles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 230–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Teichgraeber, Richard. “Rethinking Das Adam Smith Problem.” Journal of British Studies, vol. 20, no. 2 (1981), pp. 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teichgraeber, Richard. “Free Trade” and Moral Philosophy: Rethinking the Sources of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. Durham, 1986.Google Scholar

Teichgraeber, Richard. “History, Political Theory and Interpretations of Adam Smith.” Political Theory, vol. 23, February (1995), pp. 147–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tribe, Keith. “Adam Smith: Critical Theorist?” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37 (1999), pp. 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tribe, Keith. “The German Reception of Adam Smith.” A Critical Bibliography of Adam Smith, ed. Tribe, Keith. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2002, pp. 120–152.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. Natural Right Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuck, Richard. “The Contribution of History.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. Goodin, Robert E. and Petit, Philip. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983, pp. 72–89.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, Ernst. “Universalistically Approved Intersubjective Attitudes: Adam Smith,” trans. Schreibl, Bernard. Adam Smith Review, vol. 1 (2004), pp. 88–104.Google Scholar

Tully, James. “Governing Conduct.” In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe, ed. Leites, Edmund. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 12–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, James. “Introduction.” In Samuel Pufendorf, On the Duty of Man and Citizen, ed. Tully, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. xxi–xxix.Google Scholar

Tully, James. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, James. ed. Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRef

Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, James. Public Philosophy in a New Key, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Urmson, J. O. “Saints and Heroes.” In Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. Melden, A. I.. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958, pp. 198–216.Google Scholar

Valihora, Karen. “The Judgement of Judgement: Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments.” British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 41 (2000), pp. 138–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kley, Dale. “Pierre Nicole, Jansenism and the Morality of Enlightened Self-Interest.” In Anticipations of the Enlightenment in England, France, and Germany, ed. Kors, Alan C. and Korshin, Paul. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1987, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar

Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class: Introduction by Robert Lekachman. London: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar

Vertovec, Steven, and Cohen, Robin, eds. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Veyne, Paul. Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. Paris, 1976; trans. and ed. Pearce, Brian, London: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob. “Power versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” World Politics, vol. I, October (1948), pp. 1–29.

Viner, Jacob. The Role of Providence in the Social Order: An Essay in Intellectual History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob. Religious Thought and Economic Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob. Essays on the Intellectual History of Economics, ed. Irwin, Douglas A.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vivenza, Gloria. Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith's Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Vivenza, Gloria. “Reading Adam Smith in the Light of the Classics.” Adam Smith Review, vol. 1 (2004), pp. 107–124.Google Scholar

Voegelin, Eric. “Helvétius and the Heritage of Pascal.” In From Enlightenment to Revolution, ed. Hollowell, John H.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1975, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar

Holthoon, F. L. “Adam Smith and David Hume: With Sympathy.” Utilitas, vol. 5, no. 1 (1993), pp. 36–48.Google Scholar

Villiez, Carola. “Double Standard – Naturally! Smith and Rawls: A Comparison of Methods.” In New Voices on Adam Smith, ed. Montes, LeonidasSchliesser, and Eric. London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 115–139.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “What Is Cosmopolitan?” Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 2 (2000), pp. 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waller, James. Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing. 2nd edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. “Nation and Universe.” Tanner Lectures 1989. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, xi, pp. 509–556, ed. Petersen, G. B.. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Waszek, Norbert. “Two Concepts of Morality: A Distinction of Adam Smith's Ethics and Its Stoic Origin.” Journal of the History of Ideas, October (1984), pp. 591–604.

Waszek, Norbert. Man's Social Nature: A Topic of the Scottish Enlightenment in Its Historical Setting. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1986.Google Scholar

Watson, Matthew. “Trade Justice and Individual Consumption Choices: Adam Smith's Spectator Theory and the Moral Constitution of the Fair Trade Consumer.” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, no. 2 (2007), pp. 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinstein, Jack Russell. “Sympathy, Difference, and Education: Social Unity in the Work of Adam Smith.” Economics and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 1 (2006), pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werhane, Patricia. Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Whelan, Frederick G. “Legal Positivism and International Society.” In International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, ed. Mapel, David R.Nardin, and Terry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998, pp. 36–53.Google Scholar

White, Stephen K.Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Winch, Donald. Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winch, Donald. “Adam Smith's ‘Enduring Particular Result’: A Political and Cosmopolitan Perspective.” In Wealth and Virtue, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 253–269.Google Scholar

Winch, Donald. “Adam Smith and the Liberal Tradition.” In Traditions of Liberalism: Essays on John Locke, Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Sydney: Center for Independent Studies, 1988, pp. 82–104.Google Scholar

Winch, Donald. “Adam Smith: Scottish Moral Philosopher as Political Economist.” Historical Journal, vol. 35, no. 1 (1992), pp. 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winch, Donald. Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wokler, Robert. “Rousseau's Pufendorf: Natural Law and the Foundations of Commercial Society.” History of Political Thought, vol. 15, no. 3 (1994), pp. 373–402.Google Scholar

Wolf, Susan. “Moral Saints.” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 79, no. 8 (1982), pp. 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Little Brown, 1960.Google Scholar

Xenos, Nicholas. “Classical Political Economy: The Apolitical Discourse of Civil Society.” Humanities in Society, vol. 3 (1980), pp. 229–242.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. ed. Liberalism without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith N. Shklar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.