Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- For the Sake of the Argument
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Unextended Ramsey Tests
- 3 Modality without Modal Ontology
- 4 Aspects of Conditional Logic
- 5 Nonmonotonicity in Belief Change and Suppositional Reasoning
- 6 Inductive Expansion
- 7 Defaults
- 8 Matters of Degree
- 9 Normality and Expectation
- 10 Agents and Automata
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- For the Sake of the Argument
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Unextended Ramsey Tests
- 3 Modality without Modal Ontology
- 4 Aspects of Conditional Logic
- 5 Nonmonotonicity in Belief Change and Suppositional Reasoning
- 6 Inductive Expansion
- 7 Defaults
- 8 Matters of Degree
- 9 Normality and Expectation
- 10 Agents and Automata
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Name Index
- Subject Index
Summary
This book has its origins in conversations I had with André Fuhrmann at the meetings of the International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosphy of Science in Uppsala in 1991. These exchanges led to a joint essay (Fuhrmann and Levi, 1994) that discussed some peculiarities of conditional reasoning when induction is taken into consideration. One sin begets another and I began contemplating the writing of a long paper combining the version of Ramsey test conditionals I had already advocated with ideas on inductive inference I had discussed ever since I had published Gambling with Truth (Levi, 1967).
As a preliminary, however, it seemed desirable to spell out somewhat more elaborately than I had done before the view of Ramsey test conditionals I favor. At around the same time, John Collins and I started a reading group at Columbia that included as regular participants Markko Ahtisaari, Horacio Arlo Costa, John Danaher, Scott Shapiro, and, for a brief period when he was visiting Columbia, André Fuhrmann. John Collins had presented to the group his account of the structural differences between revision of belief as understood by Alchourrón, Gardenfors, and Makinson (1985) and revision by imaging in a sense parasitic on the possible-worlds semantics for conditionals pioneered by D. Lewis (1973). In the course of his presentations, Collins defended the view that imaging was best suited to characterizing suppositional reasoning whereas AGM revision is suited to changing beliefs. I had already argued (Levi, 1991) that the AGM formalism was inadequate as an account of rational belief change. And I was quite convinced that imaging was ill suited to capture suppositional reasoning – especially in applications to practical deliberations.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- For the Sake of the ArgumentRamsey Test Conditionals, Inductive Inference and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. xi - xviPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1996