Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T10:59:32.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Organizing principles and processes from developmental science for culture and caregiving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Sevda Bekman
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Get access

Summary

Human development is socialization, together with maturation. It encompasses the lifelong process of becoming social, becoming a member of a society. Thus, it involves constant interaction with the socio-cultural environment. Any study of human development, therefore, must have contextual and temporal dimensions. Indeed, significant trends in these directions are getting established with the rise of cultural and cross-cultural psychology on the one hand, and lifespan developmental approaches on the other.

(Kağıtçıbaşı (1996: 19)

Introduction

Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı's (1996) Model of Family Change (MFC) provides a systematic framework to analyze dynamic intergenerational relationships with equally dynamic socio-economic conditions. The model assigns a key role to the family as mediator between culture and self. This role, through which core cultural values are handed down across generations, is not passive. Rather, the family is cast as an active agent that selectively transmits cultural values and continually adapts to changing circumstances. This chapter discusses culture, caregiving, and child development in a way intended to complement and supplement Kağıtçıbaşı's seminal contributions.

Human beings do not grow up, and adults do not parent, in isolation, but in multiple contexts, and one notable context is culture. Culture infuses developmental and psychological phenomena and is inseparable from them. Culture is therefore a crucial desideratum in caregiving and child development. All societies prescribe certain characteristics that their members are expected to possess, and proscribe others they must not do, if they are to behave acceptably as members of the society (Harkness and Super 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azuma, H., “Why study child development in Japan?” in Stevenson, H., Azuma, H., and Hakuta, K. (eds.), Child Development and Education in Japan (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1986), pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. E. and Solchany, J. E., “Mothering,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Volume 3. Status and Social Conditions of Parenting, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Gilstrap, B., and Rovine, M., “The Pennsylvania infant and family development project, I: Stability and change in mother–infant and father–infant interaction in a family setting at one, three, and nine months,” Child Development, 55 (1984), 692–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, R., Patterns of Culture (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1934/1959).Google Scholar
Benedict, R., “Continuities and discontinuities in cultural-conditioning,” Psychiatry, 1 (1938), 161–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, R., The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1946).Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., “Cross-cultural developmental comparisons: The case of Japanese-American infant and mother activities and interactions. What we know, what we need to know, and why we need to know,” Developmental Review, 9 (1989), 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., “Approaches to parenting in culture,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Cultural Approaches to Parenting (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991).Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., “Parenting infants,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. and Lamb, M. E., Development in Infancy: An Introduction, Fifth edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008).Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Haynes, O. M., Azuma, H., Galperin, C., Maital, S., Ogino, M., Painter, K., Pascual, L., Pêcheux, M.-G., Rahn, S. Toda, Venuti, P., Vyt, A., and Wright, B., “A cross-national study of self-evaluations and attributions in parenting: Argentina, Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, and the United States,” Developmental Psychology, 34 (1998), 662–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, M. H., Tal, J., and Tamis-Lemonda, C. S., “Parenting in cross-cultural perspective: The United States, France, and Japan,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Cultural Approaches to Parenting (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991), pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Pascual, L., Haynes, O. M., Painter, K., Galperín, C., and M.-G. Pêcheux, “Ideas about parenting in Argentina, France, and the United States,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19 (1996), 347–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-Lemonda, C. S., Tal, J., Ludemann, P., Toda, S., Rahn, C. W., Pêcheux, M.-G., Azuma, H., and Vardi, D., “Maternal responsiveness to infants in three societies: The United States, France, and Japan,” Child Development, 63 (1992), 808–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J., Attachment and Loss. Volume 1 (New York: Basic Books, 1969).Google Scholar
Caudill, W., “The influence of social structure and culture on human behavior in modern Japan,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 157 (1973), 240–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Hastings, P. D., Rubin, K. H., Chen, H., Cen, G., and Stewart, S. L., “Child-rearing attitudes and behavioral inhibition in Chinese and Canadian toddlers: A cross-cultural study,” Developmental Psychology, 34 (1998), 677–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., and Li, Z., “Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: A longitudinal study,” Developmental Psychology, 31 (1995), 531–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., Li, B., and Li, D., “Adolescent outcomes of social functioning in Chinese children,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23 (1999), 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., and Sun, Y., “Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study,” Child Development, 63 (1992), 1336–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohler, B. J., and Paul, S., “Psychoanalysis and parenthood,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Volume 3. Status and Social Conditions of Parenting, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 563–99.Google Scholar
Cole, M., “Culture in development,” in Bornstein, M. H. and Lamb, M. E. (eds.), Developmental Psychology: An Advanced Textbook, Fourth edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999), pp. 73–123.Google Scholar
Cole, P. M. and Dennis, T. A., “Variations on a theme: Culture and the meaning of socialization practices and child competence,” Psychological Inquiry, 9 (1998), 276–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, P. M. and Tamang, B. L., “Nepali children's ideas about emotional displays in hypothetical challenges,” Developmental Psychology, 34 (1998), 640–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darling, N. and Steinberg, L., “Parenting style as context: An integrative model,” Psychological Bulletin, 113 (1993), 487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doi, T., The Anatomy of Dependence, translated from the Japanese by Bester, J. (Tokyo: Kodansha International, 1973).
Dunn, J. and Brown, J., “Becoming American or English? Talking about the social world in England and the United States', in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Cultural Approaches to Parenting (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991), pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
Farver, J. M., “Cultural differences in scaffolding pretend play: A comparison of American and Mexican mother–child and sibling–child pairs,” in MacDonald, K. (ed.), Parent–child Play: Descriptions and Implications (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 349–66.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Leigh, T., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G., and Target, M., “Attachment, the reflective self, and borderline states: The predictive specificity of the adult attachment interview and pathological emotional development,” in Goldberg, S., Muir, R., and Kerr, J. (eds.), Attachment Theory: Social, Developmental, and Clinical Perspectives (Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, Inc, 1995), pp. 233–78.Google Scholar
French, V., “History of parenting: The ancient Mediterranean world,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Volume 2. Biology and Ecology of Parenting, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 345–76.Google Scholar
Freud, S., An outline of Psycho-analysis (New York: Norton, 1949).Google Scholar
Geertz, C., Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Poortinga, Y. H., and Vijver, F., Family Structure and Function in 30 Nations: A Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. J., “Parents' knowledge and expectations: Using what we know,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 439–60.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. J., Cashmore, R., Cotton, S., and Knight, R., “Mothers' developmental timetables in two cultural groups,” International Journal of Psychology, 19 (1984), 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, S. and Super, C. M., “Culture and parenting,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting, vol. 2: Biology and Ecology of Parenting, 2nd ed (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrance Earlbaum, 2002), pp. 253–80.Google Scholar
Holden, G. W. and Buck, M. J., “Parental attitudes toward childrearing,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Volume 3. Status and Social Conditions of Parenting, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 537–62.Google Scholar
Holden, G. W. and Miller, P. C., “Enduring and different: A meta-analysis of the similarity in parents' child rearing,” Psychological Bulletin, 125 (1999), 223–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı, Family and Human Development across Cultures (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).
Lamb, M. E., Frodi, A. M., Frodi, M, and Hwang, C.-P., “Characteristics of maternal and paternal behavior in traditional and nontraditional Swedish families,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 5 (1982), 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiderman, P. H., Tulkin, S. R., and Rosenfeld, A. (eds.), Culture and Infancy: Variations in the Human Experience (New York: Academic Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., “Socialization and developmental change,” Child Development, 55 (1984), 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B., The Father in Primitive Psychology (New York: Norton, 1927/1966).Google Scholar
Lisi, A. V. McGillicuddy-De and Subramanian, S., “How do children develop knowledge? Beliefs of Tanzanian and American mothers,” in Harkness, S. and Super, C. M. (eds.), Parents' Cultural Belief Systems: Their Origins, Expressions, and Consequences (New York: Guilford, 1996), pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Mead, M., Growing up in New Guinea: A Comparative Study of Primitive Education (New York: William Morrow, 1930/1966).Google Scholar
Mead, M., Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies (New York: Morrow, 1935).Google Scholar
Murphey, D. A., “Constructing the child: Relations between parents' beliefs and child outcomes,” Developmental Review, 12 (1992), 199–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okagaki, L. and Bingham, G. E., “Parents' social cognitions and their parenting behaviors,” in Luster, T. and Okagaki, L. (eds.), Parenting: An Ecological Perspective, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2006), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Quinn, N. and Holland, D., “Culture and cognition,” in Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., The Andaman Islanders (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1932/1964).Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., The Cultural Nature of Human Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Schönpflug, U., “Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (2001), 174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, I. E. and Lisi, A. McGillicuddy-De, “Parental beliefs and cognitions: The dynamic belief systems model,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Volume 3. Status and Social Conditions of Parenting, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), pp. 485–508.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. and Fleeson, J., “Attachment and the construction of relationships,” in Hartup, W. W. and Rubin, Z. (eds.), Relationships and Development (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1986), pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Deeds, O., and Chung, S. F., “Intergenerational patterns of values and autonomy expectations in cultures of relatedness and separateness,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30 (1999), 575–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., Cyphers, L., Toda, S., and Ogino, M., “Language and play at one year: A comparison of toddlers and mothers in the United States and Japan,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15 (1992), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijzendoorn, M. H., “Intergenerational transmission of parenting: A review of studies in nonclinical populations,” Developmental Review, 12 (1992), 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Welles-Nyström, B., “Parenthood and infancy in Sweden,” in LeVine, R. A., Miller, P. M., and West, M. M. (eds.), Parental Behavior in Diverse Societies. New Directions for Child Development. Volume 40 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988).Google Scholar
Whiting, J. W. M. and Child, I. L., Child Training and Personality: A Cross-Cultural Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Whiting, B. B. and C. P. Edwards, Children of Different Worlds: The Formation of Social Behavior (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., and G. Ross, “The role of tutoring in problem solving,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 (1976), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×