Abend, G. 2008, ‘Two main problems in the sociology of morality’, Theory and Society, 37, pp. 87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1973, Negative Dialectics, transl. Ashton, E. B., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Alcoff, L. M. 1996, Real Knowing: New Versions of the Coherence Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. C. 1995, Fin de Siecle Social Theory, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Alkire, S. 2002, Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, E. 1993, Value in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. 2004, ‘Uses of value judgements in science: a general argument, with lessons for a case study of feminist research on divorce’, Hypatia, 19 (1), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appiah, K. A. 2005, The Ethics of Identity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Appiah, K. A. 2008, Experiments in Ethics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. 2000a, Being Human, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, M. S. 2000b, ‘Homo economicus, homo sociologicus and homo sentiens’, in Archer, M. S. and Tritter, J. Q. (eds.) Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization, London: Routledge, pp. 36–56.Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. 2003, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, M. S. 2007, Making Our Way Through the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, M. S. and Tritter, J. Q. 2000, ‘Introduction’, in Archer, M. S. and Tritter, J. Q. (eds.) Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization, London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Aristotle, 1980, The Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arpaly, N. 2003, Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Assiter, A. 2003, Revisiting Universalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baier, A. 1994, Moral Prejudices, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Barbalet, J. M. 2001, Emotions, Social Theory and Social Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barbalet, J. M. 2008, Weber, Passions and Profits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, B. 2000, Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Barry, B. 2001, Culture and Equality: an Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bartky, S. L. 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Class, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bartky, S. L. 2002, Sympathy and Solidarity, Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. 1989, Modernity and the Holocaust, London: Polity.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. 1991, Modernity and Ambivalence, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. 1993, Postmodern Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Becker, H. 1967, ‘Whose side are we on?’, Social Problems, 14, pp. 239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, D. 1960, The End of Ideology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R. 1992, Liberalism and Modern Society, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Benedict, R. 1989, Patterns of Culture, London: Mariner Books.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. 1986, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: a Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. 1992, Situating the Self, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Benner, P. 1994, ‘The role of articulation in clinical nursing’, in Tully, J. (ed.) Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, T. 1993, Natural Relations, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bevir, M. 2002, ‘A humanist critique of the archaeology of the human sciences’, History of the Human Sciences, 15 (1), pp. 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhaskar, R. 1975, A Realist Theory of Science, Leeds: Leeds Books (2nd edn 1998, Brighton: Harvester).Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. 1991, Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. 1998, The Possibility of Naturalism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Billig, M. 1996, Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. 1998, Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. 2001, Being Good: A Short Introduction to Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. 1999, Distant Suffering, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Thévènot, L. 2006, On Justification, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, S. 2003, ‘Women's work, dirty work: the gynaecology nurse as “other”’, Gender, Work and Organisations, 19 (2), pp. 5–23.Google Scholar

Bolton, S. 2007, ‘Voices’, in Bolton, S. C. (ed.) Dimensions of Dignity at Work, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, pp. 246–50.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1984, Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1990, The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1991, Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1994, Practical Reason, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1999, ‘Scattered remarks’, European Journal of Social Theory, 2, pp. 334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 2000, Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 2005, The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. 1969, Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Breen, K. 2007, ‘Work and emancipatory practice: towards a recovery of human beings’ productive capacities', Res Publica, 14 (1), pp. 381–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, G. and Pettit, P. 2004, The Economy of Esteem, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bübeck, D. G. 2002, ‘Justice and the labor of care’, in Kittay, E. F. and Feder, E. K. (eds.) The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 160–85.Google Scholar

Burawoy, M. 2005, ‘For public sociology’, American Sociological Review, 70, pp. 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, J. 2002, ‘What is critique? An essay on Foucault's virtue’, in Ingram, D. (ed.) The Political, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 212–26.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 2004a, Undoing Gender, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 2004b, Precarious Life, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Calder, G. 2005, ‘Post-Cartesian anxieties: embodied subjectivity after the linguistic turn’, New Formations, 56, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar

Calder, G. 2007, Rorty's Politics of Redescription, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Callinicos, A. 2006, The Resources of Critique, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Callon, M. 1998, The Laws of the Market, Wiley: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cassidy, J. and Shriver, P. R. (eds.) 1999, Handbook of Attachment, New York: Guilford Press.

Charlesworth, S. 2000, A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, S. J., Gilfillan, P. and Wilkinson, R. 2006, ‘Living inferiority’, Soundings, 33, pp. 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charusheela, S. 2008, ‘Social analysis and the capabilities approach: a limit to Martha Nussbaum's universalist ethics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 1,135–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1971, ‘Human nature: justice versus power. Noam Chomsky debates with Michel Foucault’ (www.chomsky.info/debates/1971xxxx.htm).

Clark, D. A. (ed.) 2006, ‘The capability approach’, in The Elgar Companion to Development Studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Collier, A. 1994, Critical Realism: An Introduction, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Collier, A. 1999a, Being and Worth, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Collier, A. 1999b, ‘About aboutness’, Alethia, 2 (1), pp. 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, A. 2003, In Defence of Objectivity, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cooke, M. 1999, ‘Habermas, feminism and autonomy’, in Dews, P. (ed.) Habermas: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 178–210.Google Scholar

Cox, R. 2006, The Servant Problem: Domestic Employment in a Global Economy, London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Craib, I. 1998, Experiencing Identity, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crocker, D. A. 1995, ‘Functioning and capability: the foundations of Sen's and Nussbaum's development ethic, part 2’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Glover, J. (eds.) Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 153–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damasio, A. 1994, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, New York: Putnam Publishing.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 2004, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1973–4, ‘On the very idea of a conceptual scheme’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, pp. 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davydova, I. and Sharrock, W. 2003, ‘The rise and fall of the fact/value distinction’, The Sociological Review, 51 (3), pp. 357–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, K. 2003, Capitalism and Citizenship: the Impossible Partnership, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Deflem, M. 2006, ‘Save Sociology’ (www.savesociology.org/).

Deigh, J. 1996, The Sources of Moral Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dews, P. (ed.) 1999, Habermas: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.

Doyal, L. and Gough, I. 1991, A Theory of Human Need, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Du Gay, P. 2000, In Praise of Bureaucracy, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Dunne, J. 1993, Back to the Rough Ground: Practical Judgment and the Lure of Technique, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 2003, Human Nature and the Limits of Science, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. 1971, Moral Education, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. 1984, The Division of Labour in Society, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, E. 2002, Suicide, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, T. 1996, The Illusions of Postmodernism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. 2003, After Theory, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. 2008, Trouble with Strangers, Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenreich, B. 2001, Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A. R. (eds.) 2002, Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy, London: Granta.

Elder-Vass, D. 2010, The Causal Power of Social Structures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, B. 1975, Social Theory and Political Practice, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Fay, B. 1987, Critical Social Science: Liberation and its Limits, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Fay, B. 1996, Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

,Feminist Economics, 2003, special issue on Amartya Sen's work and ideas: a gender perspective (guest edited by Agarwal, Bina, Humphries, Jane and Robeyns, Ingrid), 9 (2&3).

Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1993, Negotiating Family Responsibilities, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, R. and Hirsch, D. 2000, ‘The decision to commit a crime against humanity’, in Archer, M. S. and Quitter, J. Q. (eds.) Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization, London: Routledge, pp. 183–99.Google Scholar

Fischer, E. F. and Benson, P. 2006, Broccoli and Desire: Global Connections and Maya Struggles in Postwar Guatemala, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, K. and Jupp, P. C. (eds.) 2001, Virtue Ethics and Sociology, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Fleetwood, S. 2002, ‘Why neoclassical economics explains nothing at all’, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 17, article 2 (www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue17/Fleetwood17.htm).Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. 2001, Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, P. 2001, Natural Goodness, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, J. (ed.) 1997, Valuing Nature, London: Routledge.CrossRef

Foucault, M. 1976, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1977, Discipline and Punish, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1997, ‘What is critique?’, in Lotringer, S. and Hochroth, L. (eds.) The Politics of Truth, New York: Semiotexte.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1998, Interview with Didier Eribon (1981), in Kritzman, L. (ed.) Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture, New York: Routledge, p. 155.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 2000, Michel Foucault: Ethics (ed. Rabinow, P.), London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. 1989, Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. 1999, ‘Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition and participation’, in Ray, L. J. and Sayer, A. (eds.) Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn, London: Sage, pp. 53–75.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. 2003, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Freundlieb, D., Hudson, W. and Randall, J. (eds.) 2004, Critical Theory After Habermas, Leiden: Brill NV.

Frey, B. 1997, Not Just for the Money: an Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Friedan, B. 1997, The Feminine Mystique, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gasper, G. 2004, The Ethics of Development: From Economism to Human Development, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Gellner, E. 1970, ‘Concepts and society’, in Wilson, B. (ed.) Rationality, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 18–49.Google Scholar

Geras, N. 1983, Marx and Human Nature, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Geuss, R. 2008, Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilens, M. 1999, Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, J. 2000, Violence: Reflections on Our Deadliest Epidemic, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar

Glover, J. 2001, Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century, London: Pimlico.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1968, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, J. H. 1998, ‘Rational action theory for sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 49 (2), pp. 167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomberg, P. 2007, How to Make Opportunity Equal, Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. E. 1985, Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gorz, A. 1983, Critique of Economic Rationality, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Graham, K. 2002, Practical Reasoning in a Social World: How We Act Together, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 1986, Philosophy and Feminist Thinking, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Griswold, C. L. Jr. 1999, Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1971, Legitimation Crisis, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1974, Theory and Practice, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1990a, Moral Consciousness and Communication Interaction, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1990b, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1993, Justification and Application, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Haines, S. 1998, ‘Deepening the self’, in Adamson, J., Freadman, R. and Parker, D. (eds.) Renegotiating Ethics in Literature, Philosophy and Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, D. 1985, Modest Witness@Second Millennium, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harré, R. and Madden, E. H. 1975, Causal Powers, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. 1988, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, V. 2006, The Ethics of Care, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Helm, B. W. 2001, Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Value, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodson, R. 2001, Dignity at Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodson, R. 2002, ‘Demography or respect? Work group demography versus organizational dynamics as determinants of meaning and satisfaction at work?’, British Journal of Sociology, 53 (2), pp. 291–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Honneth, A. 1995, The Struggle for Recognition, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Honneth, A. 2003, ‘Redistribution as recognition’, in Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (eds.) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso, pp. 110–97.Google Scholar

Honneth, A. 2007, Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

hooks, b. 1982, Ain't I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism, London: Pluto.Google Scholar

hooks, b. 2000, Where We Stand: Class Matters, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. 1972, Dialectic of Enlightenment, New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar

Hoy, D. 1986, Foucault: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Wiley and Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1969, A Treatise on Human Nature, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, K. 1989, The Remains of the Day, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Jackall, R. 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. 1891, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life, reprinted 2009, LaVerne, TN: Kessinger Publishing (from The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy).Google Scholar

Jonas, H. 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Joyce, R. 2007, The Evolution of Morality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1985, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, and What is Enlightenment?, London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1991, The Moral Law (Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals), London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kefalas, M. 2003, Working-Class Heroes: Protecting Home, Community and Nation in a Chicago Neighborhood, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kittay, E. F. 1999, Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

LaFave, S. 2006, ‘Thinking critically about the “subjective”/“objective” distinction’ (http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/subjective_objective.html).

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1999, Philosophy and the Flesh, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lamont, M. 2000, The Dignity of Working Men, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Doeuff, M. 1989, The Philosophical Imaginary, London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Grand, J. 2003, Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, M. Y. K. 2008, ‘Universal human dignity: some reflections on the Asian context’, Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 3 (1), pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, M. 2007, Commitment, Value and Moral Realism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lovibond, S. 2002, Ethical Formation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lutz, C. A. 1988, Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, K., Baker, J. and Lyons, M. 2009, Affective Equality: Love, Care and Solidarity Work, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntyre, A. 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. 1998, A Short History of Ethics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. 1999, Rational Dependent Animals, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. and Lickiss, N. (eds.) 2007, Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Manent, P. 1998, The City of Man (transl. LePain, Marc A.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1844, ‘Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844: critique of Hegel's philosophy in general’ (www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/hegel.htm).

Marx, K. 1975, Early Writings, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1970, The German Ideology (ed. Arthur, C. J.), London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar

McCarthy, G. E. 2003, Classical Horizons: The Origins of Sociology in Ancient Greece, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Menon, N. 2002, ‘Universalism without foundations?’, Economy and Society, 31 (1), pp. 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Midgley, M. 1972, ‘Is “moral” a dirty word?’, Philosophy, XLVII (181), pp. 206–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Midgley, M. 1984, Wickedness: A Philosophical Essay, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Midgley, M. 1991, ‘The origin of ethics’, in Singer, P. (ed.) A Companion to Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar

Midgley, M. 2003, Heart and Mind (revised edn), London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1859 (1974), On Liberty (ed. Himmelfarb, G.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1861 (2001), Utilitarianism (ed. Sher, G.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.

Mill, J. S. 1874 (1904), ‘On nature’, in Nature, The Utility of Religion and Theism, Rationalist Press, pp. 7–33, and reproduced as Lancaster E-Text, 1996 (www.lancs.ac.uk/users/philosophy/texts/mill_on.htm).Google Scholar

Miller, D. and Carrier, J. 1998, Virtualism: A New Political Economy, London: Berg.Google Scholar

Moody-Adams, M. M. 1997, Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture and Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Munzer, S. R. 1997, ‘Human dignity and property rights in human body parts’, in Harris, J. W. (ed.) Property Problems: From Genes to Pension Funds, London: Kluwer, pp. 25–38.Google Scholar

Murdoch, I. 1970, The Sovereignty of Good, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. B. 1993, The Moral Economy of Labor, New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar

New, C. 2005, ‘Sex and gender: a critical realist approach’, New Formations, 56, pp. 54–70.Google Scholar

Nichols, S. 2004, Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1887 (1996), On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Noble, G. and Watkins, M. 2003, ‘So, how did Bourdieu learn to play tennis?’, Cultural Studies, 17 (3), pp. 520–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrie, A. W. 2000, Punishment, Responsibility and Justice: a Relational Critique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nove, A. 1983, A Feasible Socialism, London: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1993, ‘Non-relative virtues: an Aristotelian approach’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. (eds.) The Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1994, The Therapy of Desire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1996, ‘Compassion: the basic emotion’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 13 (1), pp. 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1998, ‘The literary imagination in public life’, in Adamson, J., Freadman, R. and Parker, D. (eds.) Renegotiating Ethics in Literature, Philosophy and Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1999, Sex and Social Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2000, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2001, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2002, ‘The future of feminist liberalism’, in Kittay, E. F. and Feder, E. K. (eds.) The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 186–214.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2004, Hiding from Humanity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2006, Frontiers of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, M. 1962, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Oakley, J. 1992, Morality and Emotions, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Olson, E. and Sayer, A. 2009, ‘Radical geography and its critical standpoints: embracing the normative’, Antipode, 41 (1), pp. 180–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, J. 1991, ‘Kantian ethics’, in Singer, P. (ed.) A Companion to Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 175–85.Google Scholar

O'Neill, J. 1992, ‘Altruism, egoism, and the market’, Philosophical Forum, 23, pp. 278–88.Google Scholar

O'Neill, J. 1993, ‘Justice, gender and international boundaries’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. (eds.) The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 303–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, J. 1994, ‘Essentialism and markets’, The Philosophical Forum, XXVI (2), pp. 87–100.Google Scholar

O'Neill, J. 1998, The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, J. 2007, Markets, Deliberation and Environment, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Parekh, B. 2000, Rethinking Multiculturalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Paules, G. F. 1991, Dishing It Out: Power and Resistance Among Waitresses in a New Jersey Restaurant, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Poole, R. 1991, Morality and Modernity, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. R. 1971, The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 1, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 2002, The Collapse of the Fact–Value Dichotomy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Reay, D. 2002, ‘Shaun's story’, Gender and Education, 14 (2), pp. 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reay, D., Hollingworth, S., Williams, K., Crozier, G., Jamieson, F., James, D. and Beedell, P. 2007, ‘A darker shade of pale? Whiteness, the middle classes and multi-ethnic inner city schooling’, Sociology, 41 (6), pp. 1,041–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. 2001, Discourse and Discrimination, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. 1982, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences (transl. Thompson, J. B.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robbins, J. (ed.) 2001, Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Rorty, R. 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, R. 1989, Culture and Truth, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Salkever, S. G. 1990, Finding the Mean: Theory and Practice in Aristotelian Political Philosophy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sayad, A. 2004, The Suffering of the Immigrant, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Sayer, A. 1992, Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sayer, A. 1995, Radical Political Economy: A Critique, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sayer, A. 2000a, ‘For postdisciplinary studies: sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism/imperialism’, in Eldridge, J., MacInnes, J., Scott, S., Warhurst, C. and Witz, A. (eds.) Sociology: Legacies and Prospects, Durham: Sociology Press, pp. 85–97.Google Scholar

Sayer, A. 2000b, Realism and Social Science, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayer, A. 2000c, ‘Moral economy and political economy’, Studies in Political Economy, Spring, pp. 79–103.Google Scholar

Sayer, A. 2005, The Moral Significance of Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayer, A. 2006, ‘Language and significance – or the importance of import: implications for critical discourse analysis’, Journal of Language and Politics, 5 (3), pp. 449–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayer, A. 2007, ‘Moral economy as critique’, New Political Economy, 12 (2), pp. 261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayer, A. 2009, ‘Contributive justice and meaningful work’, Res Publica, 15 (1), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheff, T. J. 1990, Microsociology: Discourse, Emotions and Social Structure, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffler, S. 1992, Human Morality, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffler, S. 2003, ‘What is Egalitarianism?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (1), pp. 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. 2005, ‘What is an institution?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedgewick, E. K. and Frank, A. (eds.) 1995, Shame and its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Segal, L. 1999, Why Feminism?, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1992, Inequality Re-Examined, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sennett, R. and Cobb, J. 1973, The Hidden Injuries of Class, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Sevenhuijsen, S. 1998, Citizenship and the Ethic of Care, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shotton, L. and Seedhouse, D. 1998, ‘Practical dignity in caring’, Nursing Ethics, 5 (3), pp. 246–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siegel, D. J. 1999, The Developing Mind, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1991, ‘Afterword’, in Singer, P. (ed.) A Companion to Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 543–6.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1995, Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skeggs, B. 1997, Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Skeggs, B. 2004, Class, Self, Culture, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smart, C. 2007, Personal Life, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Smith, A. 1759 (1984), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, A. 1776 (1976), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (ed. Cannan, E.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Smith, N. H. 1997, Strong Hermeneutics: Contingency and Moral Identity, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) 2009, Dignity in Care, SCIE Guide 15 (www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide15/index.asp).

Soper, K. 1990, Troubled Pleasures, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Soper, K. 1995, What is Nature?, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Soulen, R. K. and Woodhead, L. (eds.) 2006, God and Human Dignity, Cambridge: Eerdmans.

Steedman, C. 1985, Landscape for a Good Woman, London: Virago.Google Scholar

Strathern, M. 1980, ‘No nature, no culture: the Hagen case’, in MacCormac, C. P. and Strathern, M. (eds.) Nature, Culture and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, M. (ed.) 2000, Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy (EASA Series in Social Anthropology), London: Routledge.CrossRef

Tallis, R. 1988, In Defence of Realism, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1967 (1973), ‘Neutrality and political science’, in Ryan, A. (ed.) The Philosophy of Social Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–70.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1985, Philosophical Papers 1: Human Agency and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, C. 1986, ‘Foucault on freedom and truth’, in Hoy, D. C (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1989, Sources of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1993, ‘Explanation and practical reason’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. (eds.) The Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 208–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, C. 1994a, ‘The politics of recognition’, in Gutmann, A. (ed.) Multi-Culturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princetown, NJ: Princetown University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1994b, ‘Justice after virtue’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds.) After MacIntyre, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 16–43.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. 1963, The Making of the English Working Class, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. 1978, The Poverty of Theory, and Other Essays, London: Merlin.Google Scholar

Thrift, N. 2005, Knowing Capitalism, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Trigg, R. 1988, Rationality and Religion, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tronto, J. C. 1989, ‘Women and caring’, in Bordo, S. and Jaggar, A. (eds.) Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Tronto, J. C. 1994, Moral Boundaries, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tronto, J. C. 2002, ‘The “nanny” question in feminism’, Hypatia, 17, pp. 34–51.Google Scholar

Unger, P. 1996, Living High and Letting Die, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staveren, I. 2000, The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Vetlesen, A. J. 2005, Evil and Human Agency: Understanding Collective Evildoing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walby, S. 2009, Globalization and Inequalities, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Walsh, V. 1996, Rationality, Allocation and Reproduction, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Walsh, V. 2003, ‘Sen after Putnam’, Review of Political Economy, 15 (5), pp. 315–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walzer, M. 1983, Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Walzer, M. 1989, Interpretation and Social Criticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Walzer, M. 1994, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1946, Max Weber's Science as a Vocation (eds. Lassman, P. and Velody, I. with Martins, H.), London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1949a, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (transl./ed. Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A., foreword by Shils, Edward A.), Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1949b, ‘Objectivity in social science and social policy’, in Weber, M., The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 49–112.Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1949c, ‘Critical studies in the logic of the cultural sciences’, in Weber, M., The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 124–5.Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1978, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (eds. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weber, M. 2001, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar

Wellmer, A. 1971, Critical Theory of Society, New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, I. 2005, Suffering: A Sociological Introduction, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1973, ‘The idea of equality’, in Williams, B., Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard 1993, Shame and Necessity, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Williams, S. J. 2001, Emotion and Social Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Winch, P. 1958, The Idea of a Social Science, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. 1964, The Child, the Family, and the Outside World, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1922 (1960), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wood, A. W. 1990, Hegel's Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, A. W. n.d., Kant and the Problem of Human Nature (www.stanford.edu/~allenw/recentpapers.htm).

Woodiwiss, A. 2005, Human Rights, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

,World Dignity Forum (WDF) 2006, Towards Alternative Strategies to Humanise Labour and Mobility, a preliminary report on WDF conference/hearing and dignity rally at Polycentric WSF, Karachi (www.mfasia.org/mfaResources/WDF%20Karachi%20Report.pdf).

Wright, E. O. 2005, The Real Utopias Project: a General Overview (www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/OVERVIEW.html).

Wright, E. O. 2010, Envisioning Real Utopias, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Young, I. M. 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Zigon, J. 2008, Morality: An Anthropological Perspective, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar