Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T02:04:47.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Stochastic models of juror decision making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Reid Hastie
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

Stochastic models, models that characterize processes as probabilistic or chance events, have been applied fruitfully to describe many psychological phenomena. The word stochastic derives from a Greek root that means random, chance, or haphazard. In scientific usage, the antonym for stochastic would be certain or deterministic. While a deterministic model (for example, an algebraic model such as those based on Information Integration Theory) predicts a single response from a given stimulus situation, a stochastic model predicts a set of possible responses weighted by their probabilities of occurrence. It is often useful to think of stochastic models as represented metaphorically by mechanical devices such as decks of cards, roulette wheels, or dice.

Models that describe some aspects of human behavior in probabilistic terms have been applied to simple choice behavior (Luce, 1959), elementary perception and judgment phenomena (Green & Swets, 1966), and simple learning (Estes, 1959). These applications have been extremely successful in describing and predicting human behavior. The probabilistic components in the models may at some basic level of analysis (perhaps physiological) provide an accurate depiction of the underlying physical process. Furthermore, the stochastic component serves as a vehicle to generalize an account of behavior across diverse processes, individuals, or stimulus conditions (Cotton, 1982). For example, in the legal domain, it seems natural to conceptualize the diverse range of cases to which a juror might be assigned as a distribution of potential stimulus events that vary in strengths of evidence favoring one side or the other of each case.

Type
Chapter
Information
Inside the Juror
The Psychology of Juror Decision Making
, pp. 116 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×