Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T03:39:45.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The organization of lexical knowledge in the brain: Evidence from category- and modality-specific deficits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Lawrence A. Hirschfeld
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Susan A. Gelman
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

How is lexical knowledge organized in the brain? Are semantic distinctions among, for example, animals, vegetables, furniture, and musical instruments or grammatical distinctions among nouns, verbs, and adjectives reflected in the organization of lexical knowledge in the brain? In this chapter we argue that evidence from the analysis of the performance of brain-damaged subjects provides the basis for far-reaching speculations, not only about the functional organization of lexical knowledge, but also about the relation between lexical knowledge and the brain. Specifically, we review evidence suggesting that distinctions among different aspects of lexical knowledge – for example, lexical form and semantic and grammatical categories – are most likely subserved by distinct neuroanatomical structures. The evidence takes the form of selective impairments affecting restricted domains of knowledge – semantic and grammatical categories. The fractionation of lexical knowledge seemingly along the boundaries of semantic and grammatical categories offers the intriguing possibility that the organization of lexical knowledge in the brain honors these categorical distinctions.

Category-specific deficits: Semantic categories

In several reports it has been documented that brain damage can cause selective impairments of specific semantic categories. The reports of category-specific deficits have included the selective impairment of abstract or concrete nouns (e.g., Warrington, 1975; 1981), proper names (e.g., McKenna & Warrington, 1980; Semenza & Zettin, 1988; Lucchelli & De Renzi, 1992), body parts (e.g., Dennis, 1976), and geographical names (McKenna & Warrington, 1978).

Type
Chapter
Information
Mapping the Mind
Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture
, pp. 68 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×