Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T06:54:41.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Confidentiality issues under the DSU: fact-finding process versus confidentiality

from PART III - The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Systemic and Other Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Olivier Prost
Affiliation:
Attorney-at-Law, Gide Loyrette Nouel
Rufus Yerxa
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Bruce Wilson
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

The Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) is one of the fundamental achievements of the Uruguay Round. The new dispute settlement system has been sometimes called the ‘crown jewel’ of the WTO. Indeed, the DSU modified the world trading system significantly, by offering a system of binding dispute settlement based on legal rules and procedures. Such a transformation was a welcome change from the diplomatically based dispute system under the GATT 1947, which was textually weak and seriously flawed.

According to Article 3.2 of the DSU the dispute settlement mechanism is the central element in providing security and predictability of the multilateral trading system. So far this efficient, predictable and reliable rules-based dispute system has been widely hailed as an improvement over the rules and procedures of the GATT, and has earned its appellation as a ‘crown jewel’.

Nevertheless, issues arose early on with regard to the need to improve the DSU. In this respect a review of the DSU (DSU review) had been provided by WTO Members at an early stage for completion by October 1998, which presented them with an opportunity to amend the rules regulating international trade disputes. However, despite numerous extensions of the deadlines, WTO Members have been unable to complete and conclude these negotiations up to now.

Among the issues within the DSU review process are, inter alia, the improvement of transparency of the dispute settlement system and the implementation process following WTO rulings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement
The First Ten Years
, pp. 190 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×